Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Language in Context Studies
- Part I Language in Context: A Sociohistorical Perspective
- 1 Conversation Analysis
- 2 Context in Historical Linguistics
- 3 Context in Discourse Analysis
- Part II Philosophical, Semantic, and Grammatical Approaches to Context
- Part III Pragmatic Approaches to Context
- Part IV Applications of Context Studies
- Part V Advances in Multimodal and Technological Context-Based Research
- Index
- References
3 - Context in Discourse Analysis
from Part I - Language in Context: A Sociohistorical Perspective
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 30 November 2023
Book contents
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context
- Cambridge Handbooks in Language and Linguistics
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgments
- Language in Context Studies
- Part I Language in Context: A Sociohistorical Perspective
- 1 Conversation Analysis
- 2 Context in Historical Linguistics
- 3 Context in Discourse Analysis
- Part II Philosophical, Semantic, and Grammatical Approaches to Context
- Part III Pragmatic Approaches to Context
- Part IV Applications of Context Studies
- Part V Advances in Multimodal and Technological Context-Based Research
- Index
- References
Summary
The notion of “context” is currently being deployed in Discourse Analysis within approaches that subscribe to its constitutive nature. Rather than being extraneous to talk and text, context is conceptualized as an integral part of discourse, in a mutually constitutive text-context relationship. This chapter will cover key insights from three influential and affiliated ways of analyzing context: context as dynamically and interactionally achieved; context as rooted in metapragmatic awareness; and context as historicized and multidimensional. The chapter will then illustrate how these three key insights manifest themselves in the framework of small stories research. After presenting these three features of context, the chapter will focus on two core issues at the forefront of current concerns, namely ambiguity in delineating “context,” and occurrences where what can be postulated as “relevant context” is not readily retrievable from textual data. Picking up on these issues, we argue that future research will need to address discourses and contexts becoming ever more fragmented, dispersed, and even disintegrated through new communication technologies. In this respect, an analytical focus on metapragmatic awareness may aid the identification of interactionally relevant features of context as well as of the (re)affirmation of participants’ shared meanings.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Handbook of Language in Context , pp. 71 - 92Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2023
References
Agha, A. (2007). Language and Social Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination: Four Essays by M. M. Bakhtin (ed. Holquist), M.. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Bamberg, M., and Georgakopoulou, A. (2008). Small stories as a new perspective in narrative and identity analysis. Text and Talk, 28(3), 377–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauman, R., and Briggs, C. L. (1990). Poetics and performance as critical perspectives on language and social life. Annual Review of Anthropology, 19, 59–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baynham, M. (2015). Narrative and space/time. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Handbook of Narrative Analysis (pp. 117–139). Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
Berry, R. (2005). Making the most of metalanguage. Language Awareness, 14(1), 3–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Billig, M. (1999). Conversation Analysis and the claims of naivety. Discourse and Society, 10, 572–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015a). Meaning as a nonlinear effect: The birth of cool. AILA Review, 28, 7–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J. (2015b). Chronotopes, scales, and complexity in the study of language in society. Annual Review of Anthropology, 44, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blommaert, J., and De Fina, A. (2017). Chronotopic identities: On the spacetime organization of who we are. In Ikizoglu, D., Wegner, J., and De Fina, A. (eds.), Diversity and Superdiversity: Sociocultural Linguistic Perspectives (pp. 1–15). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Blommaert, J., Smits, L., and Yacoubi, N. (2020). Context and its complications. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 52–69). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breeze, R. (2011). Critical discourse analysis and its critics. Pragmatics, 21(4), 493–525.Google Scholar
Bridges, J. (2017). Gendering metapragmatics in online discourse: “Mansplaining man gonna mansplain …” Discourse, Context and Media, 20, 94–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Busch, B. (2020). Discourse, Emotions and Embodiment. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 327–349). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clarke, I., Kwon, W., and Wodak, R. (2012). A context-sensitive approach to analysing talk in strategy meetings. British Journal of Management, 23, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, J. (2011). Indexicalities of language contact in an era of globalization: Engaging with John Gumperz’s legacy. Text and Talk, 31(4), 407–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cook-Gumperz, J., and Gumperz, J. J. (2011). Commentary: Frames and contexts – Another look at the macro-micro link. Pragmatics, 21(2), 283–286.Google Scholar
Davis, J. L., and Jurgenson, N. (2014). Context collapse: Theorizing context collusions and collisions. Information, Communication and Society, 17(4), 476–485.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Fina, A. (2013). Positioning level 3: Connecting local identity displays to macro social processes. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 40–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschrijver, C. (2020a). Mediatized communication and linguistic reflexivity in contemporary public and political life. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 687–707). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschrijver, C. (2020b). Metalinguistic density as an indicator of sharedness: The case of economic and financial terms in online interaction. Language and Communication, 71, 123–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deschrijver, C. (2021). On the metapragmatics of “conspiracy theory”: Scepticism and epistemological debates in online conspiracy comments. Journal of Pragmatics, 182, 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duranti, A., and Goodwin, C., eds. (1992). Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and text: Linguistic and intertextual analysis within discourse analysis. Discourse and Society, 3(2), 193–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fetzer, A. (2004). Recontextualizing Context: Grammaticality Meets Appropriateness. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2006). Thinking big with small stories in narrative and identity analysis. Narrative Inquiry, 16(1), 122–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2007). Small Stories, Interaction and Identities. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2013). Building iterativity into positioning analysis: A practice-based approach to small stories and self. Narrative Inquiry, 23(1), 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017a). Friends and followers “in the know”: A narrative interactional approach to social media participation. In Mildorf, J. and Bronwen, T. (eds.), Dialogue across Media (pp. 155–178). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgakopoulou, A. (2017b). “Whose context collapse?”: Ethical clashes in the study of language and social media in context. Applied Linguistics Review, 8(2–3), 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. (1964). The neglected situation. American Anthropologist, 66, 133–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goffman, E. [1974] (1986). Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Goodwin, C., and Duranti, A. (1992). Rethinking context: An introduction. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 1–42). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gumperz, J. J. (1982). Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hacking, I. (1999). The Social Construction of What? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hamann, J., Maesse, J., Scholz, R., and Angermuller, J. (2019). The academic dispositif: Towards a context-centred discourse analysis. In Scholz, R. (ed.), Quantifying Approaches to Discourse for Social Sciences (pp. 51–87). Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1992). The indexical ground of deictic reference. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 43–76). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (1996). Language form and communicative practices. In Gumperz, J. J. and Levinson, S. (eds.), Rethinking Linguistic Relativity (pp. 232–270). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanks, W. F. (2006). Context, communicative. In Brown, K. (ed.), Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd ed. (pp. 115–128). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations in Sociolinguistics: An Ethnographic Approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Jaffe, A., ed. (2009). Stance: Sociolinguistic Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2004). The problem of context in computer mediated communication. In LeVine, P. and Scollon, R. (eds.), Discourse and Technology: Multimodal Discourse Analysis (pp. 20–33). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, R. H. (2009). Dancing, skating and sex: Action and text in the digital age. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 6(3), 283–302.Google Scholar
Kampf, H. A. (1987). The challenge of Marxist-Leninist propaganda. Political Communication, 4(2), 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, G., Pan, J., and Roberts, M., E. (2017). How the Chinese government fabricates social media posts for distraction, not engaged argument. American Political Science Review, 111(3), 484–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malinowski, B. (1923). The problem of meaning in primitive languages. In Ogden, C. K. and Richards, I. A. (eds.), The Meaning of Meaning (pp. 296–336). New York: Harvest.Google Scholar
Martin, J. R. (2003). Cohesion and texture. In Schiffrin, D., Tannen, D., and Hamilton, H. E. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 35–53). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maschler, Y., and Schiffrin, D. (2015). Discourse markers: Language, meaning, and context. In Tannen, D., Hamilton, H. E., and Schiffrin, D. (eds.), The Handbook of Discourse Analysis (pp. 189–221). Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Ochs, E. (1992). Indexing gender. In Duranti, A. and Goodwin, C. (eds.), Rethinking Context: Language as an Interactive Phenomenon (pp. 335–358). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Reisigl, M., and Wodak, R. (2001). Discourse and Discrimination: Rhetorics of Racism and Antisemitism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schegloff, E. (1997). Whose text? Whose context? Discourse and Society, 8, 165–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schegloff, E. A. (1998). Reflections on studying prosody in talk-in-interaction. Language and Speech, 41, 235–263.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schiffrin, D. (1987). Discourse Markers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitz, U. (2014). Semiotic economy, growth of mass media discourse, and change of written language through multimodal techniques: The case of newspapers (printed and online) and web services. In Androutsopoulos, J. (ed.), Mediatization and Sociolinguistic Change (pp. 279–304). Berlin: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Schneider, H. J. (1993). Ausprägungen pragmatischen Denkens in der zeitgenössischen Sprachphilosophie. In H. Stachowiak (ed.), Pragmatik: Handbuch pragmatischen Denkens (Vol. IV, pp. 1–37). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.Google Scholar
Scollon, R., and Scollon, S. W. (2004). Nexus Analysis: Discourse and the Emerging Internet. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1992). The indeterminacy of contextualization: When is enough enough? In P. Auer and Luzio, A. Di (eds.), The Contextualization of Language (pp. 55–76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silverstein, M. (1993). Metapragmatic discourse and metapragmatic function. In Lucy, J. A. (ed.), Reflexive Language: Reported Speech and Metapragmatics (pp. 33–58). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Silverstein, M. (2003). Indexical order and the dialectics of sociolinguistic life. Language and Communication, 23(3–4), 193–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tagg, C., and Seargeant, P. (2015). Facebook and the discursive construction of the social network. In Georgakopoulou, A. and Spilioti, T. (eds.), The Routledge Handbook of Language and Digital Communication (pp. 353–367). Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Tan, S., O’Halloran, K., and Wignell, P. (2020). Multimodality. In De Fina, A. and Georgakopoulou, A. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Discourse Studies (pp. 263–281). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van Dijk, T. A. (2006). Discourse, context and cognition. Discourse Studies, 8, 159–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verschueren, J. (2000). Notes on the role of metapragmatic awareness in language use. Pragmatics, 10(4), 439–456.Google Scholar
Wetherell, M. (1998). Positioning and interpretative repertoires: Conversation Analysis and post-structuralism in dialogue. Discourse and Society, 9, 387–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2007). Pragmatics and Critical Discourse Analysis: A cross-disciplinary study. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1), 203–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wodak, R. (2011). Complex texts: Analysing, understanding, explaining and interpreting meanings. Discourse Studies, 13(5), 623–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wortham, S., and Reyes, A. (2015). Discourse Analysis beyond the Speech Event. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, A., and Wallis, J. (2021). Trigger Warning: The CCP’s Coordinated Information Effort to Discredit the BBC. Canberra: Australian Strategic Policy Institute.Google Scholar