Abbeduto, L., Warren, S. F., & Conners, F. A. (2007). Language development in Down syndrome: From the prelinguistic period to the acquisition of literacy. Mental retardation and developmental disabilities research reviews, 13(3), 247–261.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-5®). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association. (1968). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (2nd ed.). Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

American Psychiatric Association Committee on Nomenclature and Statistics. (1952). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. Washington: American Psychiatric Association.Google Scholar

Bennett, S. J., Holmes, J., & Buckley, S. (2013). Computerized memory training leads to sustained improvement in visuospatial short-term memory skills in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 118(3), 179–192.Google Scholar

Biasini, F. J., Grupe, L., Huffman, L., & Bray, N. W. (1999). Mental retardation: A symptom and a syndrome. In Netherton, S. D., Holmes, D., & Walker, C. E. (Eds.), Child and adolescent psychological disorders: A comprehensive textbook (pp. 6–23). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Boyle, C. A., Boulet, S., Schieve, L. A., Cohen, R. A., Blumberg, S. J., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., et al. (2011). Trends in the prevalence of developmental disabilities in US children, 1997–2008. Pediatrics, 127(6), 1034–1042.Google Scholar

Broman, S. H., Nichols, P. L., Shaughnessy, P., & Kennedy, W. (1987). Retardation in young children: A developmental study of cognitive deficit. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar

Brue, A. W., & Wilmshurst, L. (2016). Essentials of intellectual disability assessment and identification. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar

Buckles, J. (2016). The epidemiology of psychiatric disorders in adults with intellectual disabilities. In Hemmings, C. & Bouras, N. (Eds.), Psychiatric and behavioral disorders in intellectual and developmental disabilites (pp. 34–44). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Butler, L. N., Sheppard-Jones, K., Whaley, B., Harrison, B., & Osness, M. (2016). Does participation in higher education make a difference in life outcomes for students with intellectual disability? Journal of Vocational Rehabilitation, 44(3), 295–298.Google Scholar

Carr, E. G., & Owen-DeSchryver, J. S. (2007). Physical illness, pain, and problem behavior in minimally verbal people with developmental disabilities. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 37(3), 413–424.Google Scholar

Coaley, K. (2014). An introduction to psychological assessment and psychometrics. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar

Cook, R. E., Klein, M. D., & Chen, D. (2015). Adapting early childhood curricula for children with special needs. Edinburgh: Pearson.Google Scholar

Coolican, J., Bryson, S. E., & Zwaigenbaum, L. (2008). Brief report: Data on the Stanford–Binet intelligence scales in children with autism spectrum disorder. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 38(1), 190–197.Google Scholar

Cooper, S. A., Smiley, E., Morrison, J., Williamson, A., & Allan, L. (2007). Mental ill-health in adults with intellectual disabilities: Prevalence and associated factors. British Journal of Psychiatry, 190(1), 27–35.Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., Quinn, P. D., Lynam, D. R., Loeber, R., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (2011). Role of test motivation in intelligence testing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 7716–7720.Google Scholar

Dykens, E. M., & Roof, E. (2008). Behavior in Prader‐Willi syndrome: Relationship to genetic subtypes and age. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 49(9), 1001–1008.Google Scholar

Einfeld, S. L., Ellis, L. A., & Emerson, E. (2011). Comorbidity of intellectual disability and mental disorder in children and adolescents: A systematic review. Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disability, 36(2), 137–143.Google Scholar

Fidler, D. J., Hepburn, S. L., Mankin, G., & Rogers, S. J. (2005). Praxis skills in young children with Down syndrome, other developmental disabilities, and typically developing children. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 59(2), 129–138.Google Scholar

Fletcher, R. J., Barnhill, J., & Cooper, S. A. (2016). An introduction to the DM-ID–2. In Diagnostic manual – intellectual disability 2: A textbook of diagnosis of mental disorders in persons with intellectual disability (pp. 1–12). New York: NADD Press.Google Scholar

Forness, S. R., & Kavale, K. A. (1994). The Balkanization of special education: Proliferation of categories for” new” behavioral disorders. Education and Treatment of Children, 17(3), 215–227.Google Scholar

Fujiura, G. T., Yamaki, K., & Czechowicz, S. (1998). Disability among ethnic and racial minorities in the United States: A summary of economic status and family structure. Journal of Disability Policy Studies, 9(2), 111–130.Google Scholar

Gardiner, K. J. (2015). Pharmacological approaches to improving cognitive function in Down syndrome: Current status and considerations. Drug Design, Development and Therapy, 9, 103–125.Google Scholar

Griffin, M. M., Wendel, K. F., Day, T. L., & McMillan, E. D. (2016). Developing peer supports for college students with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 29(3), 263–269.Google Scholar

Grigorenko, E. L., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Dynamic testing. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 75–111.Google Scholar

Hart, S. J., Visootsak, J., Tamburri, P., Phuong, P., Baumer, N., Hernandez, M. C., et al. (2017). Pharmacological interventions to improve cognition and adaptive functioning in Down syndrome: Strides to date. American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A, 173(11), 3029–3041.Google Scholar

Hodapp, R. M. (1997). Direct and indirect behavioral effects of different genetic disorders of mental retardation. American Journal on Mental Retardation, 102(1), 67–79.Google Scholar

Hodapp, R. M., & Dykens, E. M. (2009). Intellectual disabilities and child psychiatry: Looking to the future. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(1–2), 99–107.Google Scholar

Iarocci, G., & Petrill, S. A. (2012). Behavioral genetics, genomics, intelligence, and mental retardation. In Burack, J. A., Hodapp, R. M., Iarocci, G., & Zigler, E. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of intellectual disability and development (pp. 13–29). New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Kozulin, A. (2005). Learning potential assessment: Where is the paradigm shift? In Pillemer, D. B. & White, S. H. (Eds.), Developmental psychology and social change (pp. 352–367). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lemons, C. J., King, S. A., Davidson, K. A., Puranik, C. S., Fulmer, D., Mrachko, A. A., et al. (2015). Adapting phonological awareness interventions for children with Down syndrome based on the behavioral phenotype: A promising approach? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(4), 271–288.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S. (1987). Dynamic assessment: An interactional approach to evaluating learning potential. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Lidz, C. S., & Peña, E. D. (1996). Dynamic assessment: The model, its relevance as a nonbiased approach, and its application to Latino American preschool children. Language, Speech, and Hearing Services in Schools, 27(4), 367–372.Google Scholar

Maenner, M. J., Blumberg, S. J., Kogan, M. D., Christensen, D., Yeargin-Allsopp, M., & Schieve, L. A. (2016). Prevalence of cerebral palsy and intellectual disability among children identified in two US national surveys, 2011–2013. Annals of Epidemiology, 26(3), 222–226.Google Scholar

Malak, R., Kostiukow, A., Krawczyk-Wasielewska, A., Mojs, E., & Samborski, W. (2015). Delays in motor development in children with Down syndrome. Medical Science Monitor: International Medical Journal of Experimental and Clinical Research, 21, 1904–1910.Google Scholar

Maulik, P. K., Mascarenhas, M. N., Mathers, C. D., Dua, T., & Saxena, S. (2011). Prevalence of intellectual disability: A meta-analysis of population-based studies. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 32(2), 419–436.Google Scholar

McDuffie, A., Machalicek, W., Bullard, L., Nelson, S., Mello, M., Tempero-Feigles, R., et al. (2016). A spoken-language intervention for school-aged boys with fragile X syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 121(3), 236–265.Google Scholar

Missiuna, C., & Samuels, M. (1989). Dynamic assessment of preschool children with special needs: Comparison of mediation and instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 10, 53–62.Google Scholar

Morgan, P. L., Farkas, G., Hillemeier, M. M., Mattison, R., Maczuga, S., Li, H., & Cook, M. (2015). Minorities are disproportionately underrepresented in special education: Longitudinal evidence across five disability conditions. Educational Researcher, 44(5), 278–292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Oh, D. L., Jerman, P., Silvério Marques, S., Koita, K., Purewal Boparai, S. K., Burke Harris, N., et al. (2018). Systematic review of pediatric health outcomes associated with childhood adversity. BMC Pediatrics, 18(1), 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1037-7Google Scholar

Olson, H. C., Morse, B. A., & Huffine, C. (1998). Development and psychopathology: Fetal alcohol syndrome and related conditions. Seminars in Clinical Neuropsychiatry, 3(4), 262–284.Google Scholar

Palisano, R. J., Walter, S. D., Russell, D. J., Rosenbaum, P. L., Gémus, M., Galuppi, B. E., et al. (2001). Gross motor function of children with Down syndrome: Creation of motor growth curves. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(4), 494–500.Google Scholar

Plotner, A. J., & Marshall, K. J. (2015). Postsecondary education programs for students with an intellectual disability: Facilitators and barriers to implementation. Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 53(1), 58–69.Google Scholar

Pulina, F., Carretti, B., Lanfranchi, S., & Mammarella, I. C. (2015). Improving spatial-simultaneous working memory in Down syndrome: Effect of a training program led by parents instead of an expert. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1265.Google Scholar

Reiss, S., Levitan, G. W., & Szyszko, J. (1982). Emotional disturbance and mental retardation: diagnostic overshadowing. American Journal of Mental Deficiency, 86(6), 567–574.Google Scholar

Schalock, R. L., Borthwick-Duffy, S. A., Bradley, V. J., Buntinx, W. H., Coulter, D. L., Craig, E. M., et al. (2010). Intellectual disability: Definition, classification, and systems of supports (11th ed.). Washington: American Association on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities.Google Scholar

Shulman, C., Flores, H., Iarocci, G., & Burack, J. A. (2011). Intellectual disability: Concepts, definitions, and assessment. In Howlin, P. A., Charman, T., & Ghaziuddin, M. (Eds.), Handbook of developmental disorders (pp. 365–402). Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications Inc.Google Scholar

Singh, N. N., Lancioni, G. E., Myers, R. E., Karazsia, B. T., Courtney, T. M., & Nugent, K. (2017). A mindfulness-based intervention for self-management of verbal and physical aggression by adolescents with Prader–Willi syndrome. Developmental Neurorehabilitation, 20(5), 253–260.Google Scholar

Smith, L. E., Barker, E. T., Seltzer, M. M., Abbeduto, L., & Greenberg, J. S. (2012). Behavioral phenotype of fragile X syndrome in adolescence and adulthood. American Journal Intellectual Development Disability, 117, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1352/1944-7558-117.1.1COMP: LinkGoogle Scholar

Sovner, R. (1986). Limiting factors in the use of DSM-III criteria with mentally ill/mentally retarded persons. Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 22, 1055–1059.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Grigorenko, E. L. (2000). Theme-park psychology: A case study regarding human intelligence and its implications for education. Educational Psychology Review, 12(2), 247–268. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009079500495Google Scholar

Tager‐Flusberg, H., & Kasari, C. (2013). Minimally verbal school‐aged children with autism spectrum disorder: The neglected end of the spectrum. Autism Research, 6(6), 468–478.Google Scholar

Tzuriel, D. (1992). The dynamic assessment approach: A reply to Frisby and Braden. Journal of Special Education, 26, 302–324.Google Scholar

Wang, H., Pati, S., Pozzo-Miller, L., & Doering, L. C. (2015). Targeted pharmacological treatment of autism spectrum disorders: Fragile X and Rett syndromes. Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience, 9, 55.Google Scholar

World Health Organization (2018). International Classification of Diseases 11th Revision (ICD-11). Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Zigler, E. (1967). Familial mental retardation: A continuing dilemma. Science, 155(3760), 292–298.Google Scholar

Zigler, E., & Hodapp, R. M. (1986). Understanding mental retardation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Baeck, E. (2002). The neural networks of music. European Journal of Neurology, 9(5), 449–460.Google Scholar

Bates, E. (1997). On language savants and the structure of the mind. International Journal of Bilingualism, 1(2), 163–186.Google Scholar

Baumgarten, F. (1930). Wunderkinder psychologische untersuchungen. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosious Barth. (Untranslated)Google Scholar

Bidder, G. P. (1856). On mental calculation. Minutes of Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers, Vol. 15, session 1855–56, February 19 and 26.Google Scholar

Bokkon, I., Salari, V., Scholkmann, F., Dai, J., & Grass, F. (2013). Interdisciplinary implications on autism, savantism, Asperger syndrome and the biophysical picture representation: Thinking in pictures. Cognitive Systems Research, 22–23, 67–77.Google Scholar

Bornstein, M. H., & Krasnegor, N. A. (Eds.) (1989). Stability and continuity in mental development: Behavioral and biological perspectives. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Brody, L. E., & Stanley, J. C. (2005). Youths who reason exceptionally well mathematically and/or verbally: Using the MVCT: 4 Model to develop their talents. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 20–37). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bruner, J. (1971). The nature and uses of immaturity. American Psychologist, 27, 1–22.Google Scholar

Butterworth, B. (2001). What makes a prodigy? Nature Neuroscience, 4(1), 11–12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Campbell, J. I. D. (2005). Handbook of mathematical cognition. New York: Psychology Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, E. F., & Linfoot, J. J. (1983). George Parker Bidder: The calculating prodigy. Institute of Mathematics and Its Applications, 23, 68–71.Google Scholar

Clynes, T. (2015). The boy who played with fusion. New York: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.Google Scholar

Comeau, G., Lu, Y., Swirp, M., & Mielke, S. (2017a). Measuring the musical skills of a prodgy: A case study. Intelligence, 66, 84–97.Google Scholar

Comeau, G., Vuvan, D. T., Picard-Deland, C., & Peretz, I. (2017b). Can you tell a prodigy from a professional musician? Music Perception, 35, 199–209.Google Scholar

Conway, F., & Siegelman, J. (2005). Dark hero of the information age: In search of Norbert Wiener, the father of cybernetics. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Cowan, R., Stainthorp, R., Kapnogianni, S., & Anastasiou, M. (2004). The development of calendrical skills. Cognitive Development, 19(2), 169–178.Google Scholar

Edmunds, A. L., & Noel, K. A. (2003). Literary precocity: An exceptional case among exceptional cases. Roeper Review, 25(4), 185–194.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.) (1996). The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Romer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (1995). Intelligence in prodigies. In Sternberg, R. (Ed.), Encyclopedia of intelligence (pp. 845–850). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (1999). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on gifts and talents. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 22(2), 159–167.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (2000). Figurative and operative processes in the development of artistic talent. Human Development, 43, 60–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (2003). A developmental, evolutionary perspective on gifts and talents. In Borland, J. (Ed.), Rethinking gifted education (pp. 9–33). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (2008). Prodigies. In Plucker, J. & Callahan, C. (Eds.), Critical issues and practices in gifted education (pp. 501–512). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H. (2016). Two roads diverged in the musical wood: A coincidence approach to the lives and careers of Nyiregyhazi and Menuhin. In McPherson, G. (Ed.), Musical prodigies: Interpretations from psychology, education, musicology, and ethnomusicology (pp. 115–133). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H., with Goldsmith, L. T. (1986). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Fodor, J. (1983). The modularity of mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H., Kornhaber, M., & Wake, W. (1996). Intelligence: Multiple perspectives. Fort Worth, TX: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.Google Scholar

Gladwell, M. (2008). Outliers: The story of success. New York: Little Brown.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, L. T. (1987). Girl prodigies: Some evidence and some speculations. Roeper Review, 10(2), 74–82.Google Scholar

Goldsmith, L. T. (2000). Tracking trajectories of talent: Child prodigies growing up. In Friedman, R. C. & Shore, B. M. (Eds.), Talents unfolding: Cognition and development (pp. 89–118). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Hermelin, B., & O’Connor, N. (1986). Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Rules and regularities. Psychological Medicine, 16, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Hildesheimer, W. (1982/1977). Mozart. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Hill, A. L. (1977). Idiots-savants: Rate of incidence. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 161–162.Google Scholar

Ho, W. (Ed.) (1989). Yani: The brush of innocence. New York: Hudson Hills Press.Google Scholar

Hollingworth, L. (1942). Children above 180 IQ. Yonkers-on-Hudson, NY: World Book. (Reprinted by Arno Press, 1975.)Google Scholar

Hou, C., Miller, B., Cummings, J., Goldberg, M., Mychack, P., Bottino, B., & Benson, F. (2000). Artistic savants. Neuropsychiatry, 13, 29–38.Google Scholar

Howard, R. W. (2008). Linking extreme precocity and adult eminence: A study of eight prodigies at international chess. High Ability Studies, 19(2), 117–130.Google Scholar

Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 399–406.Google Scholar

Hulbert, A. (2005). The prodigy puzzle. New York Times Magazine, November 30, 64–71.Google Scholar

Johnson, R. (2005). A genius explains. The Guardian, February 12. www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/feb/12/weekend7.weekend2Google Scholar

Kanigel, R. (1991). The man who knew infinity: A life of the genius Ramanujan. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar

Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1992). Beyond modularity: A developmental perspective on cognitive science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Kearney, K., & Kearney, C. (1998). Accidental genius. Juneau, AK: Woodshed Press.Google Scholar

Kenneson, C. (1998). Musical prodigies: Perilous journeys, remarkable lives. Portland, OR: Amadeus Press.Google Scholar

Kunda, M., & Goel, A. (2011). Thinking in pictures as a cognitive account of autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1157–1177.Google Scholar

Leites, N. S. (1960). Intellectual giftedness. Moscow: APN Press.Google Scholar

Leites, N. S. (Ed.) (1996). Psychology of giftedness of children and adolescents. Moscow: Academia.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2006). Study of mathematically precocious youth after 35 years: Uncovering antecedents for the development of math-science expertise. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(4), 316–345.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Morelock, M. J. (2000). Gender differences in engineering and physical sciences among the gifted: An inorganic-organic distinction. In Heller, K., Mönks, F., Sternberg, R., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 633–648). New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). 1 in 10,000: A longitudinal study of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 718–729.Google Scholar

McPherson, G. E. (Ed.) (2006). The child as musician: A handbook of musical development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

McPherson, G. E. (2007). Diary of a child prodigy musician. In Williamson, A. & Coimbra, D. (Eds.), Proceedings of the International Symposium on Performance Science 2007 (pp. 213–218). Porto, Portugal: Association of European Conservatories.Google Scholar

Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Miller, B. L., Boone, K., Cummings, L. R., & Mishkin, F. (2000). Functional correlates of musical and visual ability in frontotemporal dementia. British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 458–463.Google Scholar

Miller, B. L., Cummings, J., Mishkin, F., Boone, K., Prince, F., Ponton, M., et al. (1998). Emergence of artistic talent in fronto-temporal dementia. Neurology, 51, 978–982.Google Scholar

Miller, L. K. (1989). Musical savants: Exceptional skill in the mentally retarded. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Miller, L. K. (1999). The savant syndrome: Intellectual impairment and exceptional skill. Psychological Bulletin, 125(1), 31–46.Google Scholar

Miller, L. K. (2005). What the savant syndrome can tell us about the nature and nurture of talent. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 28(3–4), 361–374.Google Scholar

Morelock, M. J. (1995). The profoundly gifted child in family context. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Tufts University, Medford, MA.Google Scholar

Morelock, M. J. (2013). Prodigies, passion, persistence, and pretunement: Musings on the biological bases of talent. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 83–101). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1993). Prodigies and savants: What they have to tell us about giftedness and human cognition. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., & Passow, A. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 161–181). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (1999). Prodigies. In Runco, M. & Pritzker, S. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of creativity (pp. 1303–1320). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Morelock, M. J., & Feldman, D. H. (2003). Prodigies, savants and Williams syndrome: Windows into talent and cognition. In Monks, F. J., Heller, K. A., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. (Eds.), International handbook for research on giftedness and talent (2nd ed., pp. 455–469). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Mursell, J. (1937). The psychology of music. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, M. (2008a). Adolescent psychopathology and the developing brain. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37, 481–483.Google Scholar

O’Boyle, M. (2008b). Mathematically gifted children: Developmental brain characteristics and their prognosis for well-being. Roeper Review, 30, 181–186.Google Scholar

O’Connor, N. (1989). The performance of the “idiot savant”: Implicit and explicit. British Journal of Disorders of Communication, 24, 1–20.Google Scholar

O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1984). Idiot savant calendrical calculators: Math or memory? Psychological Medicine, 14, 801–806.Google Scholar

O’Connor, N., & Hermelin, B. (1987). Visual and graphic abilities of the idiot savant artist. Psychological Medicine, 17, 79–80.Google Scholar

Patel, A. D. (2008). Music, language and the brain. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Peek, F. (1997). The real Rain Man. Salt Lake City, UT: Harkness.Google Scholar

Peek, F., with Hanson, L. L. (2007). The life and message of the real Rain Main: The journey of a mega-savant. Port Chester, NY: Dude Publishing/National Professional Resources.Google Scholar

Pring, L., Ryder, N., Crane, L., & Hermelin, B. (2012). Creativity in savant artists with autism. Autism, 16, 45–57.Google Scholar

Radford, J. (1990). Child prodigies and exceptional early achievers. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Revesz, G. (1916/1970). The psychology of a musical prodigy. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar

Rolfe, L. (1978). The Menuhins: A family odyssey. San Francisco: Panjandrum Books.Google Scholar

Ruthsatz, J., & Detterman, D. K. (2003). An extraordinary memory: The case study of a musical prodigy. Intelligence, 31, 509–518.Google Scholar

Ruthsatz, J., & Stephens, K. (2016). The prodigy’s cousin. New York: Penguin Random House.Google Scholar

Ruthsatz, J., & Urbach, J. B. (2012). Child prodigy: A novel cognitive profile places elevated general intelligence, exceptional working memory and attention to detail at the root of prodigiousness. Intelligence, 40, 419–426.Google Scholar

Sacks, O. (1995). An anthropologist on Mars. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar

Scheerer, M., Rothmann, E., & Goldstein, K. (1945). A case of “idiot savant”: An experimental study of personality organization. Psychology Monograph, 58, 1–63.Google Scholar

Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1995a). In vivo evidence of structural brain asymmetry in musicians. Science, 267, 699–701.Google Scholar

Schlaug, G., Jancke, L., Huang, Y., & Steinmetz, H. (1995b). Increased corpus callosum size in musicians. Neuropsychologica, 33, 1047–1055.Google Scholar

Selfe, L. (1977). Nadia: A case of extraordinary drawing ability in an autistic child. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Shavinina, L. (1999). The psychological essence of the child prodigy phenomenon: Sensitive periods and cognitive experience. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43(1), 25–38.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1994). Greatness: Who makes history and why. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1999). Talent and its development: An emergenic and epigenetic model. Psychological Review, 106(3), 435–457.Google Scholar

Singh, H., & O’Boyle, M. W. (2004). Inter-hemispheric interaction during global-local processing in mathematically gifted adolescents, average-ability youth, and college students. Neuropsychology, 18(2), 371–377.Google Scholar

Smith, N. V., & Tsimpli, I. (1995). The mind of a savant: Language learning and modularity. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Smith, S. B. (1983). The great mental calculators: The psychology, methods, and lives of calculating prodigies past and present. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar

Snyder, A. (2009). Explaining and inducing savant skills: Privileged access to lower level, less processed information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 1399–1405.Google Scholar

Snyder, A., Mulcahy, E., Taylor, J., Mitchell, D., Sachdev, P., & Gandevia, S. (2003). Savant-like skills exposed in normal people by suppressing the left fronto-temporal lobe. Journal of Integrative Neuroscience, 2, 149–158.Google Scholar

Solomon, A. (2012). Far from the tree: Parents, children, and the search for identity. New York: Scribner’s.Google Scholar

Stanley, J. C. (1996). SMPY in the beginning. In Benbow, C. P. & Lubinski, D. (Eds.), Intellectual talent: Psychometric and social issues (pp. 225–235). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar

Stanley, J. C. (2000). Helping students learn only what they don’t already know. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 6, 216–222.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Tammet, D. (2006). Born on a blue day: Inside the extraordinary mind of an autistic savant. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Tammet, D. (2009). Embracing the wide sky: A tour across the horizons of the mind. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, A. (1993). History of giftedness and “gifted education” in world perspective. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., & Passow, A. H. (Eds.), International handbook of research and development of giftedness and talent (pp. 3–27). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar

Thioux, M., Stark, D. E., Klaiman, C., & Schultz, R. T. (2006). The day of the week when you were born in 700 ms: Calendar computation in an autistic savant. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32(5), 1155–1168.Google Scholar

Thompson, R., & Nelson, C. (2001). Developmental science and the media. American Psychologist, 56(1), 5–15.Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (1989). Extraordinary people: Understanding “idiot savants.” New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (2006). Extraordinary people: Understanding savant syndrome. Omaha, NE: iUniverse.Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (2008). Myths that persist: Savant syndrome 2008. www.wisconsinmedicalsociety.org/professional/savant-syndrome/resources/articles/myths-that-persist-savant-syndrome-2008Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (2009). The savant syndrome: An extraordinary condition. A synopsis: Past, present, future. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, 364, 1351–1357.Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (2013). Savant syndrome: A compelling case for innate talent. In Kaufman, S. B. (Ed.), The complexity of greatness: Beyond talent or practice (pp. 103–118). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Treffert, D. (2014). Savant syndrome: Realities, myths and misconceptions. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 44, 564–571.Google Scholar

Tsimpli, I., & Smith, N. (1999). Modules and quasi-modules: Language and theory of mind in a polyglot savant. Learning and Individual Differences, 10(3), 193–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Viscott, D. S. (1970). A musical idiot savant. Psychiatry, 33, 494–515.Google Scholar

Wallace, A. (1986). The prodigy: A biography of William James Sidis, America’s greatest child prodigy. New York: Dutton.Google Scholar

Wiener, N. (1953). Ex-prodigy: My childhood and youth. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar

Winner, E. (1982). Invented worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar

Winner, E. (1996). The rage to master: The decisive role of talent in the visual arts. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 271–301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Young, R. (1995). Savant syndrome: Processes underlying extraordinary abilities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Adelaide, South Australia.Google Scholar

Zimmerman, R. (Writer) (1989). A Real Rainman [VHS Film]. Maple Plain, MI: Simitar Entertainment.Google Scholar

Archambault, F. X. Jr., Westberg, K. L., Brown, S., Hallmark, B. W., Emmons, C., & Zhang, W. (1993). Regular classroom practices with gifted students: Results of a national survey of classroom teachers. Research Monograph 93102. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., & VanTassel-Baska, J. (2015a). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that hold back America’s brightest students, vol. 1. Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., VanTassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski-Shoplik, A. (2015). A nation empowered: Evidence trumps the excuses that hold back America’s brightest students, vol. 2. Iowa City: Belin-Blank Center for Gifted Education and Talent Development, University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Baum, S. M. (2008). Talent centered model for twice exceptional students. In Renzulli, J. S., Gubbins, E. J., McMillen, K. S., Eckert, R. D., & Little, C. A. (Eds.), Systems and models in gifted education (pp. 17–48). Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar

Baum, S. M., Renzulli, J. S., & Hébert, T. P. (1995). Reversing underachievement: Creative productivity as a systematic intervention. Gifted Child Quarterly, 39, 224–235.Google Scholar

Baum, S., Schader, R. M., & Hébert, T. P. (2014). Through a different lens: Reflecting on a strengths-based, talent-focused approach for twice-exceptional learners. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 311–327.Google Scholar

Bloom, B. S. (Ed.) (1985). Developing talent in young people. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar

Borland, J. H. (1989). Planning and implementing programs for the gifted. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Borland, J. H. (2012). A landmark monograph in gifted education, and why I disagree with its major conclusion. The Creativity Post. www.creativitypost.com/education/a_landmark_monograph_in_gifted_education_and_why_i_disagree_with_its_majorGoogle Scholar

Carroll, J. B. (1993). Human cognitive abilities: A survey of factor-analytic studies. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ceci, S. J., & Papierno, P. B. (2005). The rhetoric and reality of gap closing: When the “have nots” gain but the “haves” gain even more. American Psychologist, 60, 149–160.Google Scholar

Colangelo, N., Assouline, S., & Gross, M. (Eds.) (2004). A nation deceived: How schools hold back America’s brightest students. Iowa City: University of Iowa.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). Flow and the foundations of positive psychology: The collected works of Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1993). Talented teenagers: A longitudinal study of their development. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dai, D. Y. (2010). The nature and nurture of giftedness: A new framework for understanding gifted education. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Dai, D. Y., & Renzulli, J. S. (2008). Snowflakes, living systems, and the mystery of giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 52, 114–130.Google Scholar

Davis, J. L. (2010). Bright, talented, and Black: A guide for families of African-American gifted learners. Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.Google Scholar

Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York: Random House.Google Scholar

Feldman, D. H., & Goldsmith, L. T. (1991). Nature’s gambit: Child prodigies and the development of human potential. New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar

Ford, D. Y., Grantham, T. C., & Whiting, G. W. (2008). Culturally and linguistically diverse students in gifted education: Recruitment and retention issues. Exceptional Children, 74, 289–306.Google Scholar

Frasier, M. M., & Passow, A. H. (1994). Toward a new paradigm for identifying talent potential. Research Monograph 94112. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Gagne, F. (2000). Understanding the complex choreography of talent development. In Heller, K. A., Monks, F. J., Sternberg, R. J., & Subotnik, R. F. (Eds.), International handbook of giftedness and talent (pp. 67–79). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (1995a). Reflections on multiple intelligences: Myths and messages. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(3), 200–209.Google Scholar

Gardner, H., with the collaboration of Laskin, E. (1995b). Leading minds: An anatomy of leadership. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (2006). Multiple intelligences: New horizons. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (2016a). Multiple intelligences: Prelude, theory, and aftermath. In Sternberg, R. J., Fiske, S. T., & Foss, D. J. (Eds.), Scientists making a difference: One hundred eminent behavioral and brain scientists talk about their most important contributions (pp. 167–170). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Gardner, H. (2016b). Three frames for good work. In Levinson, M. & Fay, J. (Eds.), Dilemmas of educational ethics: Cases and commentaries (pp. 97–100). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.Google Scholar

Gavin, M. K., Casa, T. M., Adelson, J. L., Carroll, S. R., Sheffield, L. J., & Spinelli, A. M. (2007). Project M3: Mentoring mathematical minds: Challenging curriculum for talented elementary students. Journal of Advanced Academics, 18, 566–585.Google Scholar

Gelbar, N. W. (Ed.) (2017). Adolescents with autism spectrum disorder: A clinical handbook. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gentry, M. L., & Owen, S. V. (1999). An investigation of the effects of total school flexible cluster grouping on identification, achievement, and classroom practices. Gifted Child Quarterly, 43, 224–243.Google Scholar

Gubbins, E. J., Housand, B., Oliver, M., Schader, R., De Wet, C., Moon, T. et al. (2007). Unclogging the mathematics pipeline through access to algebraic understanding. Research Monograph 08236. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Gustafsson, J., & Undheim, J. O. (1996). Individual differences in cognitive functions. In Berliner, D. C. & Calfee, R. C. (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 186–242). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Hamilton, R., McCoach, D. B., Tutwiler, M. S., Siegle, D., Gubbins, E. J., Callahan, C. M., Brodersen, A. V., et al. (2018). Disentangling the roles of institutional and individual poverty in the identification of gifted students. Gifted Child Quarterly, 62, 6–24.Google Scholar

Hébert, T. P. (1993). Reflections at graduation: The long-term impact of elementary school experiences in creative productivity. Roeper Review, 16, 22–28.Google Scholar

Housand, A., & Reis, S. M. (2009). Self-regulated learning in reading: Gifted pedagogy and instructional settings. Journal of Advanced Academics, 20, 108–136.Google Scholar

Li, Y., & Bates, T. C. (2017). Does growth mindset improve children’s IQ, educational attainment or response to setbacks? Active-control interventions and data on children’s own mindsets. osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/tsdwyGoogle Scholar

Lohman, D. F., Gambrell, J., & Lakin, J. (2008). The commonality of extreme discrepancies in the ability profiles of academically gifted students. Psychology Science Quarterly, 50, 269–282.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Benbow, C. P., & Kell, H. J. (2014). Life paths and accomplishments of mathematically precocious males and females four decades later. Psychological Science, 25, 2217–2232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614551371Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Webb, R. M., Morelock, M. J., & Benbow, C. P. (2001). Top 1 in 10,000: A 10 year follow-up of the profoundly gifted. Journal of Applied Psychology, 4, 718–729.Google Scholar

Olszewski-Kubilius, P. (2015). Talent searches and accelerated programming for gifted students. In Assouline, S. G., Colangelo, N., Vantassel-Baska, J., & Lupkowski- Shoplik, A. (Eds.), A nation empowered (vol. 2, pp. 111–121). Iowa City, IA: Belin- Blank Center.Google Scholar

Pfeiffer, S. I., Shaunessy-Dedrick, E., & Foley-Nicpon, M. (Eds.) (2018). APA handbook of giftedness and talent (APA handbooks in psychology). Washington: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar

Phillipson, S. N., & McCann, M. (2007). Conceptions of giftedness: Sociocultural perspectives. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M. (1998). Work left undone. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M. (2002). Toward a theory of creativity in diverse creative women. Creativity Research Journal, 14, 305–316.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M. (2005). Feminist perspectives on talent development: A research based conception of giftedness in women. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., Baum, S. M., & Burke, E. (2014). An operational definition of twice-exceptional learners: Implications and applications. Gifted Child Quarterly, 58, 317–230.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., Gubbins, E. J., Briggs, C., Schreber, F. R., Richards, S., Jacobs, J., et al. (2004). Reading instruction for talented readers: Case studies documenting few opportunities for continuous progress. Gifted Child Quarterly, 48, 309–338.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., Hébert, T. P., Díaz, E. I., Maxfield, L. R., & Ratley, M. E. (1995). Case studies of talented students who achieve and underachieve in an urban high school. Research Monograph No. 95120. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., & McCoach, D. B. (2000). The underachievement of gifted students: What do we know and where do we go? Gifted Child Quarterly, 44, 152–170.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Coyne, M., Schreiber, F. J., Eckert, R. D., & Gubbins, E. J. (2007). Using planned enrichment strategies with direct instruction to improve reading fluency, comprehension, and attitude toward reading: An evidence-based study. Elementary School Journal, 108, 3–24.Google Scholar

Reis, S. M., Neu, T. W., & McGuire, J. M. (1997). Case studies of high ability students with learning disabilities who have achieved. Exceptional Children, 63, 463–479.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (1978). What makes giftedness: Reexamining a definition. Phi Delta Kappan, 60, 180–184.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (1986). The three ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (246–279). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (2002). Expanding the conception of giftedness to include co-cognitive traits and to promote social capital. Phi Delta Kappan, 84(1), 33–40, 57–58.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (2005). The three-ring conception of giftedness: A developmental model for promoting creative productivity. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 217–245). Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S. (2012). Reexamining the role of gifted education and talent development for the 21st century: A four-part theoretical approach. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 150–159.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Park, S. (2002 ). Giftedness and high school dropouts: Personal, family, and school-related factors. Research Monograph No. 02168. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (1997). The school-wide enrichment model: A comprehensive plan for educational excellence. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2003). Conception of giftedness and its relation to the development of social capital. In Colangelo, N. & Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (3rd ed., pp. 75–87). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Renzulli, J. S., & Reis, S. M. (2014). The Schoolwide Enrichment Model: A how-to guide for talent development (3rd ed.). Waco, TX: Prufrock Press.Google Scholar

Shavinia, L. V. (2001). Beyond IQ: A new perspective on the psychological assessment of intellectual abilities. New Ideas in Psychology, 19(1), 27–47.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (1998). Creativity, genius, and talent development. Roeper Review, 21(1), 86–87.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2005). Genetics of giftedness: The implications of an emergenic-epigenetic model of giftedness. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 312–326). Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Simonton, D. K. (2008). Scientific talent, training, and performance: Intellect, personality, and genetic endowment. Review of General Psychology, 12, 28–46Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1985). Beyond IQ: A triarchic theory of human intelligence. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1990). Wisdom and its relations to intelligence and creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Wisdom: Its nature, origins, and development (pp. 142–159). New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Successful intelligence: How practical and creative intelligence determine success in life. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (1998). A balance theory of wisdom. Review of General Psychology, 2, 347–365.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Why schools should teach for wisdom: The balance theory of wisdom in educational settings. Educational Psychologist, 36, 227–245.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2004). Culture and intelligence. American Psychologist, 59, 325–338.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2005). The WISC model of giftedness. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. (Eds.), Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed., pp. 327–342). Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J. (2015). Successful intelligence: A new model for testing intelligence beyond IQ tests. European Journal of Education and Psychology, 8, 76–84.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (Eds.) (1986). Conceptions of giftedness. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. (Eds.) (2005). Conceptions of giftedness (2nd ed.). Boston: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd: Cultivating creativity in a culture of conformity. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2011). Rethinking giftedness and gifted education: A proposed direction forward based on psychological science. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 12, 3–54.Google Scholar

Subotnik, R. F., Olszewski-Kubilius, P., & Worrell, F. C. (2012). A proposed direction forward for gifted education based on psychological science. Gifted Child Quarterly, 56, 176–188.Google Scholar

Tannenbaum, A. J. (1991). The social psychology of giftedness. In Colangelo, N. & Davis, G. A. (Eds.), Handbook of gifted education (pp. 27–44). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar

Terman, L. M. (1925–1959). Genetic studies of genius (5 vols.). Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Tieso, C. L. (2002). The effects of grouping and curricular practices on intermediate students’ math achievement. Research Monograph 02154. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

United States Department of Education, Office of Educational Research and Improvement. (1993). National excellence: A case for developing America’s talent. Washington: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Westberg, K. L. (2012). Young creative producers: twenty years later. Gifted Education International, 26, 261–270.Google Scholar

Westberg, K. L., Archambault, F. X. Jr., Dobyns, S. M., & Salvin, T. J. (1993). An observational study of instructional and curricular practices used with gifted and talented students in regular classrooms. Research Monograph 93104. National Research Center on the Gifted and Talented, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT.Google Scholar

Winner, E. (1996). Gifted children: Myths and realities. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar

Adler, L. L. (Ed.) (1993). International handbook on gender roles. Westport, CT: Greenwood.Google Scholar

Allport, G. W., Vernon, P. E., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Manual for the study of values (3rd ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar

American Association of University Women. (1992). The AAUW report: How schools shortchange girls. New York: Marlowe.Google Scholar

Arden, R., & Plomin, R. (2006). Sex differences in variance of intelligence across childhood. Personality and Individual Differences, 41, 39–48.Google Scholar

Baker, D. P., & Jones, D. P. (1992). Opportunity and performance: A sociological explanation for gender differences in academic mathematics. In Wrigley, J. (Ed.), Education and gender equality (pp. 193–206). London: Falmer Press.Google Scholar

Bakhiet, S. F. A., & Lynn, R. (2015). Sex differences on the Wechsler Intelligence Scale for Children – III in Bahrain and the United States. Psychological Reports, 117, 794–798.Google Scholar

Banaji, M. R., & Hardin, C. D. (1996). Automatic stereotyping. Psychological Science, 7, 136–141.Google Scholar

Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar

Benbow, C. P., & Stanley, J. C. (1983). Sex differences in mathematical reasoning ability: More facts. Science, 222, 1029–1030.Google Scholar

Berenbaum, S. A., Bryk, K. K., & Beltz, A. M. (2012). Early androgen effects on spatial and mechanical abilities: Evidence from congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Behavioral Neuroscience, 126, 86–96. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0026652Google Scholar

Berenbaum, S. A., Korman, K., & Leveroni, C. (1995). Early hormones and sex differences in cognitive abilities. Special issue, Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 303–321.Google Scholar

Bjornholm, L., Nikkinen, J., Kiviniemi, V., Nordstrom, T., Niemela, S., Drakesmith, M., et al. (2017). Structural properties of the human corpus callosum: Multimodal assessment and sex differences. Neuroimage, 152, 108–118.Google Scholar

Blackburn, C. C. (2004). Developing exceptional talent: Descriptive characteristics of highly precocious mathematical and verbal reasoners. Paper presented at the Seventh Biennial Henry B. and Jocelyn Wallace National Research Symposium on Talent Development, University of Iowa, Iowa City, May.Google Scholar

Blair, C., Granger, D., & Razzam, R. P. (2005). Cortisol reactivity is positively related to executive function in preschool children attending Head Start. Child Development, 76, 554–567.Google Scholar

Blair, I. V., & Banaji, M. R. (1996). Automatic controlled processes in stereotype priming. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1142–1163.Google Scholar

Braun, K. V. N., Christensen, D., Doernberg, N., Schieve, L., Rice, C., Wiggins, L., et al. (2015). Trends in the prevalence of autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, hearing loss, intellectual disability, and vision impairment, Metropolitan Atlanta, 1991–2010. PLoS One. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0124120Google Scholar

Brody, N. (1992). Intelligence (2nd ed.). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar

Buss, D. M. (1995). Psychological sex differences: Origins through sexual selection. American Psychologist, 50, 164–168.Google Scholar

Cahill, L. (Ed.) (2017). An issue whose time has come: Sex/gender influence on nervous system function. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 1–791.Google Scholar

Charles, M., & Bradley, K. (2009). Indulging our gendered selves? Sex segregation by field of study in 44 countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114, 924–976.Google Scholar

Cherney, I. D. (2008). Mom, let me play more computer games: They improve my mental rotation skills. Sex Roles, 59, 776–786.Google Scholar

Cheryan, S., Master, A., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2015). Cultural stereotypes as gatekeepers: Increasing girls’ interest in computer science and engineering by diversifying stereotypes. Frontiers in Psychology, 6. http://journal.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00049/fullGoogle Scholar

Collaer, M. L., & Hines, M. (1995). Human behavioral sex differences: A role for gonadal hormones during early development? Psychological Bulletin, 118, 55–107.Google Scholar

College Board. (2015). 2015 college-bound seniors: Total group profile report. media.collegeboard.org/digitalServices/pdf/sat/total-group-2015.pdfGoogle Scholar

Colom, R., Juan-Espinosa, M., Abad, F., & García, L. F. (2000). Negligible sex differences in general intelligence. Intelligence, 28, 57–68.Google Scholar

Corbett, C., Hill, C., & St. Rose, A. (2008). Where the girls are: The facts about gender equity in education. Washington: American Association of University Women.Google Scholar

Davies, A. P. C., & Sheckelford, T. K. (2006). An evolutionary psychological perspective on gender similarities and differences. American Psychologist, 61, 641–642.Google Scholar

Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88, 276–287.Google Scholar

Dickens, W. T., & Flynn, J. R. (2001). Heritability estimates versus large environmental effects: The IQ paradox. Psychological Review, 108, 346–369.Google Scholar

Doyle, R. A., & Voyer, D. (2016). Stereotype manipulation effects on math and spatial test performance: A meta-analysis. Learning and Individual Differences, 47, 103–116.Google Scholar

Duckworth, A. L., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2006). Self-discipline gives girls the edge: Gender in self-discipline, grades, and achievement test scores. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 198–208.Google Scholar

Dumontheil, I. (2016). Adolescent brain development. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 10, 39–44.Google Scholar

Dykiert, D., Gale, C. R., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Are apparent sex differences in mean IQ scores created in part by sample restriction and increased male variance? Intelligence, 37, 42–47.Google Scholar

Eccles, J. S. (1987). Gender roles and women’s achievement-related decisions. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 11, 135–172.Google Scholar

Else-Quest, N. M., & Grabe, S. (2012). The political is personal: Measurement and application of national-level indicators of gender equity in psychological research. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 36, 131–144.Google Scholar

Feng, J., Spence, I., & Pratt, J. (2007). Playing an action video game reduces gender differences in spatial cognition. Psychological Science, 18, 850–855.Google Scholar

Fine, C. (2017). Testosterone rex: Myths of sex, science, and society. New York: Norton.Google Scholar

Flore, P. C., & Wicherts, J. M. (2015). Does stereotype threat influence performance of girls in stereotyped domains? A meta-analysis. Journal of School Psychology, 53, 25–44.Google Scholar

Frenzel, A. C., Pekrun, R., & Goetz, T. (2007). Girls and mathematics – A “hopeless” issue? A control-value approach to gender differences in emotions towards mathematics. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 22, 497–514.Google Scholar

Frick, A., & Mohring, W. (2013). Mental object rotation and motor development in 8- and 10-month-old infants. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 115, 708–720.Google Scholar

Ganley, C. M., Mingle, L. A., Ryan, A. M., Ryan, K., Vasilyeva, M., & Perry, M. (2013). An examination of stereotype threat effects on girls’ mathematics performance. Developmental Psychology, 49, 1886–1897.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (1996). Sexual selection and sex differences in mathematical abilities. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 19, 229–284.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2007). Educating the evolved mind: Conceptual foundations for an evolutionary educational psychology. In Carlson, J. S. & Levin, J. R. (Eds.), Educating the evolved mind (pp. 1–100). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.Google Scholar

Geary, D. C. (2017). Evolutionary framework for identifying sex- and species-specific vulnerabilities in brain development and functions. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 355–361.Google Scholar

Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., & Eid, M. (2008). A note on sex differences in mental rotation in different age groups. Intelligence, 36, 556–563.Google Scholar

Gerstorf, D., Herlitz, A., & Smith, J. (2006). Stability of sex differences in cognition in advanced old age: The role of education and attrition. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences and Social Sciences, 61, 245–249.Google Scholar

Giedd, J. N., Castellanos, F. X., Rajapakse, J. C., Vaituzis, A. C., & Rapoport, J. L. (1997). Sexual dimorphism of the developing human brain. Progress in Neuropsychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry, 21, 1185–1901.Google Scholar

Grau, S. L., & Zotos, Y. C. (2016). Gender stereotypes in advertising: A review of current research. International Journal of Marketing, 35, 761–770.Google Scholar

Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102, 4–27.Google Scholar

Guiso, L., Monte, F., Sapienza, P., & Zingales, L. (2008). Culture, gender, and math. Science, 320, 1164–1165.Google Scholar

Haier, R. J., Jung, R. E., Yeo, R. A., Head, K., & Alkire, M. T. (2005). The neuroanatomy of general intelligence: Sex matters. NeuroImage, 25, 320–327.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F. (2011). Sex differences in cognitive abilities (4th ed.). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Benbow, C., Geary, D., Gur, D., Hyde, J., & Gernsbacher, M. A. (2007). The science of sex-differences in science and mathematics. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 8, 1–52.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., Eliot, L., Bigler, R. S., Fabes, R. A., Hanish, L. D., Hyde, J., et al. (2011). The pseudoscience of single-sex schooling. Science, 333, 1706–1707.Google Scholar

Halpern, D. F., & Tan, U. (2001). Stereotypes and steroids: Using a psychobiosocial model to understand cognitive sex differences. Brain and Cognition, 45, 392–414.Google Scholar

Hampson, E. (1990). Estrogen-related variations in human spatial and articulatory-motor skills. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 15, 97–111.Google Scholar

Hampson, E., & Kimura, D. (1988). Reciprocal effects of hormonal fluctuations on human motor and perceptual-spatial skills. Behavioral Neuroscience, 102, 456–459.Google Scholar

Hayes, A. R., Pahlke, E. E., & Bigler, R. S. (2011). The efficacy of single-sex education: Testing for selection and peer quality effects. Sex Roles, 65, 693–703.Google Scholar

Hedges, L. V., & Nowell, A. (1995). Sex differences in mental test scores, variability, and numbers of high-scoring individuals. Science, 269, 41–45.Google Scholar

Heil, M., & Jansen-Osmann, P. (2008). Gender differences in math and mental rotation accuracy but not in mental rotation speed in 8-years-old children. International Journal of Developmental Science, 2, 190–196.Google Scholar

Herlitz, A., Reuterskiöld, L., Lovén, J., Thilers, P. P., & Rehnman, J. (2013). Cognitive sex differences are not magnified as a function of age, sex hormones, or puberty development during early adolescence. Developmental Neuropsychology, 38, 167–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/87565641.2012.759580Google Scholar

Hunt, E., & Madhyastha, T. (2008). Recruitment modeling: An analysis and an application to the study of male-female differences in intelligence. Intelligence, 36, 653–663.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2005). The gender similarity hypothesis. American Psychologist, 60, 581–592.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S. (2014). Gender similarities and differences. Annual Review of Psychology, 65, 373–398.Google Scholar

Hyde, J. S., Lindberg, S. M., Linn, M. C., Ellis, A. B., & Williams, C. C. (2008). Gender similarities characterize math performance. Science, 321, 494–495.Google Scholar

Imperato-McGinley, J., Pichardo, M., Gautier, T., Voyer, D., & Bryden, M. P. (1991). Cognitive abilities in androgen insensitive subjects – Comparison with control males and females from the same kindred. Clinical Endocrinology, 34, 341–347.Google Scholar

Innocenti, G. M. (1994). Some new trends in the study of the corpus callosum. Behavioral and Brain Research, 64, 1–8.Google Scholar

Irwing, P., & Lynn, R. (2005). Intelligence: Is there a difference in IQ scores? Nature, 438, 31–32.Google Scholar

Jancke, L., & Steinmetz, H. (1994). Interhemispheric-transfer time and corpus callosum size. Neuroreport, 5, 2385–2388.Google Scholar

Jensen, A. R. (1998). The g factor: The science of mental ability. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar

Joel, D., Berman, Z., Tavor, I., Wexler, N., Gaber, O., Stein, Y., et al. (2015). Sex beyond the genitalia: The human brain mosaic. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112, 15468–15473.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., & Bouchard, T. J. (2006). Sex differences in mental abilities: g masks the dimensions on which they lie. Intelligence, 35, 23–59.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2008). Sex differences in variability in general intelligence: A new look at an old question. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3, 518–531.Google Scholar

Johnson, W., Carothers, A., & Deary, I. J. (2009). A role for the X chromosome in sex differences in variability in general intelligence? Perspectives in Psychological Science, 4, 598–611.Google Scholar

Karpiak, C. P., Buchanan, J. P., Hosey, M., & Smith., A. (2007). University students from single-sex and coeducational high schools: Differences in majors and attitudes at a Catholic university. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 31, 282–289.Google Scholar

Kaufman, S. B. (2007). Sex differences in mental rotation and spatial visualization ability: Can they be accounted for by differences in working memory capacity? Intelligence, 35, 211–223.Google Scholar

Kiefer, A. K., & Sekaquaptewa, D. (2007). Implicit stereotypes, gender identification, and math-related outcomes: A prospective study of female college students. Psychological Science, 18, 13–18.Google Scholar

Kimball, M. M. (1989). A new perspective on women’s mathematics achievement. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 198–214.Google Scholar

Kotsopoulos, D., Zambrzycka, J., & Makosz, S. (2017). Gender differences in toddlers’ visual-spatial skills. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 19, 167–180.Google Scholar

Lakin, J. M. (2013). Sex differences in reasoning abilities: Surprising evidence that male-female ratios in the tails of the quantitative reasoning distribution have increased. Intelligence, 41, 263–274.Google Scholar

Lauermann, F., Tsai, Y., & Eccles, J. S. (2017). Math-related career aspirations and choices within Eccles et al.’s expectancy-value theory of achievement-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 53, 1540–1559.Google Scholar

LeBlanc, E. S., Janowsky, J., Chan, B. K., & Nelson, H. D. (2001). Hormone replacement therapy and cognition: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of American Medical Association, 285, 1489–1499.Google Scholar

Levine, S. C., Huttenlocher, J., Taylor, A., & Langrock, A. (1999). Early sex differences in spatial skill. Developmental Psychology, 35, 940–949.Google Scholar

Levy, R., & Goldman-Rakic, P. S. (2000). Segregation of working memory functions within the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Experimental Brain Research, 133, 23–32.Google Scholar

Linn, M. C., & Petersen, A. C. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479–1498.Google Scholar

Lippa, R. A., Collaer, M. L., & Peters, M. (2010). Sex differences in mental rotation and line angle judgments are positively associated with gender equality and economic development across 53 nations. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39(4), 990–997. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9460-8Google Scholar

Locklear, M. N., Cohen, A. B., Jone, A., & Kritzer, M. F. (2016). Sex differences distinguish intracortical glutamate receptor-mediated regulation of extracellular dopamine levels in the prefrontal cortex of adult rats. Cerebral Cortex, 26, 599–610.Google Scholar

Loewen, J. W., Rosser, P., & Katzman, J. (1988). Gender bias in SAT items. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, April 5–9.Google Scholar

Loring-Meier, S., & Halpern, D. F. (1999). Sex differences in visual-spatial working memory: Components of cognitive processing. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 464–471.Google Scholar

Lott, B., & Maluso, D. (1993). The social learning of gender. In Beall, A. E. & Sternberg, R. J. (Eds.), The psychology of gender (pp. 99–123). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar

Low, L.-F., & Ansley, K. J. (2006). Hormone replacement therapy and cognitive performance in postmenopausal women – a review by cognitive domain. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 66–84.Google Scholar

Lubinski, D., Schmidt, D. B., & Benbow, C. P. (1996). A 20-year stability analysis of the Study of Values for intellectually gifted individuals from adolescence to adulthood. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 443–451.Google Scholar

Luine, V. N. (2008). Sex steroids and cognitive function. Journal of Neuroendocrinology, 20, 866–872.Google Scholar

Lutchamaya, S., Baron-Cohen, S., & Raggatt, P. (2002). Foetal testosterone and vocabulary size in 18- and 24-month-old infants. Infant Behavior and Development, 24, 418–424.Google Scholar

Maguire, E. A., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (1997). Recalling routes around London: Activation of the right hippocampus in taxi drivers. Journal of Neuroscience, 17, 7103–7110.Google Scholar

Maguire, E. A., Gadian, D. G., Johnsrude, I. S., Ashburner, C. D., Frackowiak, R. S. J., & Frith, C. D. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 97, 4398–4403.Google Scholar

Maitland, S. B., Intrieri, R. C., Schaie, K. W., & Willis, S. L. (2000). Gender differences and changes in cognitive abilities across the adult life span. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7, 32–53.Google Scholar

Makel, M. C., Wai, J., Peairs, K. F., & Putallaz, M. (2016). Sex differences in the right tail of cognitive abilities: An update and cross cultural extension. Intelligence, 59, 8–15.Google Scholar

Master, A., Cheryan, S., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2014). Reducing adolescent girls’ concerns about STEM stereotypes: When do female teachers matter? International Review of Social Psychology, 27, 79–102.Google Scholar

McCarrey, A. C., An, Y., Kitner-Triolo, M. H., Ferrucci, L., & Resnick, S. M. (2016). Sex differences in cognitive trajectories in clinically normal older adults. Psychology and Aging, 31, 166–175.Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., Eagly, A. H., & Linn, M. C. (2015). Women’s representation in science predicts national gender-science stereotypes: Evidence from 66 nations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 631–644.Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2012). Can spatial training improve long-term outcomes for gifted STEM undergraduates? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 141–152.Google Scholar

Miller, D. I., & Halpern, D. F. (2014). The new science of cognitive sex differences. Trends in Cognitive Science, 18, 37–45.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2008). Mental rotation in human infants: A sex difference. Psychological Science, 19, 1063–1066.Google Scholar

Moore, D. S., & Johnson, S. P. (2011). Mental rotation of dynamic, three-dimensional stimuli by 3-month-old infants. Infancy, 16, 435–445.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Mueller, S. C., Temple, V., Oh, E., VanRyzin, C., Williams, A., Cornwell, B., et al. (2008). Early androgen exposure modulates spatial cognition in congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 33, 973–980.Google Scholar

National Science Board. (2010). Preparing the next generation of STEM innovators: Identifying and developing our nation’s human capital. www.nsf.gov/nsb/publications/2010/nsb1033.pdfGoogle Scholar

National Science Foundation. (2014). STEM education data and trends 2014. How do US 15-year-olds compare with students from other countries in math and science? www.nsf.gov/nsb/sei/edTool/data/highschool-08.htmlGoogle Scholar

Nosek, B. A., Smyth, F. L., Sriram, N., Linder, N. M., Devos, T. A., Thierry, A., et al. (2009). National differences in gender-science stereotypes predict national sex differences in science and math achievement. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 106, 10593–10597.Google Scholar

Nyborg, H. (2005). Sex-related differences in general intelligence g, brain size, and social status. Personality and Individual Differences, 39, 497–509.Google Scholar

Pahlke, E., Hyde, J. S., & Allison, C. M. (2014). The effects of single-sex compared with coeducational schooling on students’ performance and attitudes: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 140, 1042–1072.Google Scholar

Paus, T., Wong, A. P-Y., Syme, C., & Pausova, Z. (2017). Sex differences in the adolescent brain and body: Findings from the Saguenay youth study. Journal of Neuroscience Research, 95, 362–370.Google Scholar

Perry, M. J. (2015). 2015 SAT test results confirm pattern that’s persisted for 40+ years – high school boys are better at math than girls. AEIdeas. www.aei.org/publication/2015-sat-test-results-confirm-pattern-thats-persisted-for-40-years-high-school-boys-are-better-at-math-than-girlsGoogle Scholar

Posner, M. I., & Raichle, M. E. (1994). Images of mind. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar

Puts, D. A., McDaniel, M. A., Jordan, C. L., & Breedlove, S. M. (2008). Spatial ability and prenatal androgens: Meta-analyses of congenital adrenal hyperplasia and digit ratio (2D:4D) studies. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37, 100–111.Google Scholar

Quinn, P. C., & Liben, L. S. (2008). A sex difference in mental rotation in young infants. Psychological Science, 19, 1067–1070.Google Scholar

Quinn, P. C., & Liben, L. S. (2014). A sex difference in mental rotation in infants: Convergent evidence. Infancy, 19, 103–116.Google Scholar

Rampey, B. D., Dion, G. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2009). NAEP trends in academic progress (NCES 2009–479). National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, US Department of Education, Washington.Google Scholar

Reynolds, M. R., Scheiber, C., Hajovsky, D. B., Schwartz, B., & Kaufman, A. S. (2015). Gender differences in academic achievement: Is writing an exception to the gender similarities hypothesis? Journal of Genetic Psychology, 176, 211–234.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Cox, S. R., Shen, X., Lombardo, M. V., Reus, L. M., Alloza, C., et al. (2018). Sex differences in the adult human brain: Evidence from 5,216 UK Biobank participants. Cerebral Cortex, 28(8), 2959–2975.Google Scholar

Ritchie, S. J., Tucker-Drob, E. M., Cox, S. R., Corley, J., Dykiert, D., Redmond, P., et al. (2016). Predictors of ageing-related decline across multiple cognitive functions. Intelligence, 59, 115–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2016.08.007Google Scholar

Ruigrok, A. N. V., Salimi-Khorshidi, G., Lai, M-C., Baron-Cohen, S., Lombardo, M. V., Tait, R. J., & Suckling, J. (2014). A meta-analysis of sex differences in human brain structure. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 39, 34–50.Google Scholar

Ryan, J., Carriere, I., Scali, J., Ritchie, K., & Ancelin, M-L. (2009). Life-time estrogen exposure and cognitive functioning in later life. Psychoneuroendocrinology, 34, 287–298.Google Scholar

Sadker, M., & Sadker, D. (1995). Failing at fairness: How our schools cheat girls. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Salovey, P., & Mayer, J. D. (1990). Emotional intelligence. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 9, 185–211.Google Scholar

Schmidt, F. L., & Hunter, J. (2004). General mental ability in the world of work: Occupational attainment and job performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 162–173.Google Scholar

Schmitt, D. P., Realo, A., Voracek, M., & Allik, J. (2015). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168–182. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168.Google Scholar

Schwarzer, G., Freitag, C., Buckel, R., & Lofruthe, A. (2013). Crawling is associated with mental rotation ability by 9-month-old infants. Infancy, 18, 432–441.Google Scholar

Sherwin, B. (2003). Estrogen and cognitive functioning in women. Endocrine Reviews, 24, 133–151.Google Scholar

Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628–654.Google Scholar

Simonsen, H. G., Kristoffersen, K. E., Bleses, D., Wehberg, S., & Jørgensen, R. N. (2014). The Norwegian Communicative Development Inventories: Reliability, main developmental trends and gender differences. First Language, 34(1), 3–23. https://doi.org/10.1177/0142723713510997Google Scholar

Skuse, D. (2005). X-linked genes and mental functioning. Human Molecular Genetics, 14, R27–R32.Google Scholar