Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-18T04:29:54.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Creativity in the Visual Arts

from Part II - Creativity in the Traditional Arts

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 September 2017

By
Matthew Pelowski ,
Helmut Leder  and
Pablo P. L. Tinio
Edited by
James C. Kaufman ,
Vlad P. Glăveanu  and
John Baer
James C. Kaufman
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Vlad P. Glăveanu
Affiliation:
Universitetet i Bergen, Norway
John Baer
Affiliation:
Rider University, New Jersey
Get access

Summary

Abstract

In this chapter, we review research on creativity with visual art, and, specifically, how this has been addressed within the psychology of art. We begin with a brief review of the history of psychology of art and the unique challenges associated with studying artistic creativity and expression. We then review current creativity studies that touch on art making and that focus on techniques and methods that provide the foundation for current research. We conclude with a consideration of important questions that hold particular intrigue for future study, such as questions related to artistic development, approaches to assessing art making, and the artistic brain.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity across Domains , pp. 80 - 109
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acosta, L. M. Y. (2014). Creativity and neurological disease. Current neurology and neuroscience reports, 14(8), 1–6.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Children’s artistic creativity: Detrimental effects of competition in a field setting. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 573–578.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1982). Social psychology of creativity: A consensual assessment technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 997–1013.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The social psychology of creativity. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: Update to “The social psychology of creativity.” Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (2001). Beyond talent: John Irving and the passionate craft of creativity. American Psychologist, 56, 333–336.Google Scholar
Arnheim, R. (1956). Art and visual perception: A psychology of the creative eye. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Conti, R. (1997). Environmental determinants of work motivation, creativity, and innovation: The case of R&D downsizing. Technological innovation: Oversights and foresights, 111–125.Google Scholar
Arrell, D. (1997). Teaching aesthetics to artists. American Society for Aesthetics Newsletter, 17(2). Retrieved on April 10, 2017 from http://aesthetics-online.org/?page=ArrellArtists.Google Scholar
Aziz-Zadeh, L., Liew, S. L., & Dandekar, F. (2013). Exploring the neural correlates of visual creativity. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 8(4), 475–480.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (1994). Performance assessments of creativity: Do they have long-term stability? Roeper Review, 7(1), 7–11.Google Scholar
Baer, J., & McKool, S. (2009). Assessing creativity using the consensual assessment. In Schreiner, C. (Ed.), Handbook of assessment technologies, methods, and applications in higher education. Hershey, PA: IGI Global.Google Scholar
Ball, O. E., & Torrance, E. P. (1984). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Streamlined scoring workbook: Figural and B. Bensenville, IL: Scholastic Testing Service.Google Scholar
Barbot, B., & Tinio, P. P. L. (2015). Where is the “g” in creativity? A specialization-differentiation hypothesis. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8, 1–4.Google Scholar
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 439–476.Google Scholar
Becker, H. S. (1982). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Besemer, S. (1998) Creative Product Analysis Matrix: Testing the model structure and a comparison among products-three novel chairs. Creativity Research Journal, 11(4), 333–346.Google Scholar
Besemer, S., & O’Quin, K. (1987). Creative analysis: Testing a model by developing a judging instrument. In Isaksen, S. (Ed.), Frontiers of creativity research (pp. 367–389). Buffalo, NY: Bearly.Google Scholar
Bhattacharya, J., & Petsche, H. (2005). Drawing on mind’s canvas: Differences in cortical integration patterns between artists and non-artists. Human Brain Mapping, 26(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
Bogousslavsky, J. (2005). Artistic creativity, style and brain disorders. European Journal of Neurology, 54(2), 103–11.Google Scholar
Canesi, M., Rusconi, M. L., Isaias, I. U., & Pezzoli, G. (2012). Artistic productivity and creative thinking in Parkinson’s disease. European Journal of Neurology, 19, 468–472.Google Scholar
Carothers, T., & Gardner, H. (1979). When children’s drawings become art: The emergence of aesthetic production and perception. Developmental Psychology, 15(5), 570.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H., Peterson, J. B., & Higgins, D. M. (2005). Reliability, validity, and factor structure of the creative achievement questionnaire. Creativity Research Journal, 17(1), 37–50.Google Scholar
Cassandro, V., & Simonton, K. (2010). Versatility, openness to experience, and topical diversity in creative products: An exploratory historiometric analysis of scientists, philosophers, and writers. Journal of Creative Behavior, 44, 1–18.Google Scholar
Cela-Conde, C. J., Agnati, L., Huston, J. P., Mora, F., & Nadal, M. (2011). The neural foundations of aesthetic appreciation. Progress in Neurobiology, 94(1), 39–48.Google Scholar
Chamberlain, R., McManus, I. C., Riley, H., Rankin, Q., & Brunswick, N. (2013). Local processing enhancements associated with superior observational drawing are due to enhanced perceptual functioning, not weak central coherence. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66(7), 1448–1466.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., & Chan, L. (2007). Creativity and drawing abilities of Chinese students in Hong Kong: Is there a connection? New Horizons in Education, 55(3), 77–94.Google Scholar
Chan, D. W., & Zhao, Y. (2010). The relationship between drawing skill and artistic creativity: Do age and artistic involvement make a difference? Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), 27–36.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2003). Prospects for a cognitive neuroscience of visual aesthetics. Bulletin of Psychology of the Arts, 4(2), 55–60.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2004). The neuropsychology of visual artistic production. Neuropsychologia, 42(11), 1568–1583.Google Scholar
Chatterjee, A. (2010). Neuroaesthetics: A coming of age story. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(1), 53–62.Google Scholar
Chen, C., Himsel, A., Kasof, J., Greenberger, E., & Dmitrieva, J. (2006). Boundless creativity: Evidence for the domain generality of individual differences in creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 40, 179–199.Google Scholar
Clark, G., & Zimmerman, E. (2004). Teaching talented art students: Principles and practices. New York, NY: Teachers College, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Cohen, D. J. (2005). Look little, look often: The influence of gaze frequency on drawing accuracy. Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 997–1009.Google Scholar
Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Normal personality assessment in clinical practice: The NEO Personality Inventory. Psychological Assessment, 4(1), 5–13.Google Scholar
Cox, M.V., Koyasu, M., Hiranuma, H. & Perara, J. (2001). Children’s human figure drawings in the UK and Japan: The effects of age, sex, and culture. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 19, 275–292.Google Scholar
Cropley, A. J. (2000). Defining and measuring creativity: are creativity tests worth using? Roeper Review, 23(2), 72–79.Google Scholar
Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Torrance, E. P., & Zuo, L. (1999). Why should the Torrance tests of creative thinking be used to assess creativity? The Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving, 9, 77–101.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity: Contemporary psychological perspectives (pp. 325–339). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). The creative personality. Psychology Today, 29(4), 36–40.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 313–335). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Abuhamdeh, S., & Nakamura, J. (2005). Flow. A general context for a concept of mastery motivation. In Elliot, A. J. & Dweck, C. S. (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 598–608). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
Dake, D. M. (1991). The visual definition of visual creativity. Journal of Visual Literacy, 1, 99–118.Google Scholar
Davis, J. (1993). Drawing’s demise: U-shaped development in graphic symbolization. Studies in Art Education, 38, 132–157.Google Scholar
Davis, G. A., & Rimm, S. B. (1982). Group Inventory for Finding Interests (GIFFI) I and II: Instruments for identifying creative potential in junior and senior high school. Journal of Creative Behavior, 16, 50–57.Google Scholar
DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138–1151.Google Scholar
Dissanayake, E. (2000). Art and intimacy: How the arts began. Seattle, WA: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Drago, V., Foster, P. S., Okun, M. S., Haq, I., Sudhyadhom, A., Skidmore, F. M., & Heilman, K. M. (2009). Artistic creativity and DBS: a case report. Journal of the Neurological Sciences, 276(1), 138–142.Google Scholar
Drake, J. E., & Winner, E. (2009). Precocious realists: Perceptual and cognitive characteristics associated with drawing talent in non-autistic children. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 364(1522), 1449–1458.Google Scholar
Dutton, D. (2009). The art instinct: Beauty, pleasure & human evolution. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eisner, E. W. (2002). The arts and the creation of mind. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (1996). The acquisition of expert performance: An introduction to some of the issues. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports and games (pp. 1–50). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Espinel, C. H. (1996) de Kooning’s late colours and forms: Dementia, creativity, and the healing power of art. Lancet, 347, 1096–1098.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1997). Creativity and personality. In Runco, M. (Ed.), The creativity research handbook (pp. 41–66). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Fechner, G. T. (1876). Vorschule der aesthetik (Vol. 1). Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(4), 290–309.Google Scholar
Feist, G. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 273–296). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J., & Brady, T. R. (2004). Openness to experience, non-conformity, and the preference for abstract art. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22(1), 77–89.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (1999). The development of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 169–188). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feldman, D. H. (2003). Key issues in creativity and development. In Sawyer, R. K., John-Steiner, V., Moran, S., Sternberg, R. J., Feldman, D. H., Nakamura, J. et al. (Eds.), Creativity and development (pp. 219–220). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finke, R. A. (1990). Creative imagery: Discoveries and inventions in visualization. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Franck, K., & Rosen, E. (1949). A projective test of masculinity-femininity. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 13(4), 247.Google Scholar
Frecska, E., More, C. E., Vargha, A., & Luna, L. E. (2012). Enhancement of creative expression and entoptic phenomena as after-effects of repeated ayahuasca ceremonies. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs, 44, 191–199.Google Scholar
Gallo, F., Golomb, C., & Barroso, A. (2002). Compositional strategies in drawing: The effects of two-and three-dimensional media. Visual Arts Research, 28, 2–23.Google Scholar
Gansler, D. A., Moore, D. W., Susmaras, T. M., Jerram, M. W., Sousa, J., & Heilman, K. M. (2011). Cortical morphology of visual creativity. Neuropsychologia, 49(9), 2527–2532.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1989). The key in the slot: Creativity in a Chinese key. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 23, 141–158.Google Scholar
Gardner, H., & Winner, E. (1982). First intimations of artistry. In Strauss, S. (Ed.), U-shaped behavioral growth (pp. 147–168). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The creative vision: A longitudinal study of problem-finding in art. New York, NY: Wiley Interscience.Google Scholar
Golomb, C. (1992). The child’s creation of a pictorial world. Berkley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Gombrich, E. H. (1960). Art and illusion: A study in the psychology of pictorial representation. Bollingen Ser. XXXV, (5), 9.Google Scholar
Goodman, N. (1968). Languages of art: An approach to a theory of symbols. Indianapolis, IN: Hackett Publishing.Google Scholar
Gretton, C., & ffytche, D. H. (2014). Art and the brain: A view from dementia. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 29(2), 111–126.Google Scholar
Guilford, J. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Han, K. (2003). Domain specificity of creativity in young children: How quantitative and qualitative data support it. Journal of Creative Behavior, 37, 117–142.Google Scholar
Hekkert, P., & Van Wieringen, P. C. (1996). Beauty in the eye of expert and nonexpert beholders: A study in the appraisal of art. The American Journal of Psychology, 109(3), 389–407.Google Scholar
Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 89–102.Google Scholar
Hennessey, B. A. (1994). The consensual assessment technique: An examination of the relationships between ratings of product and process creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 193–208.Google Scholar
Holert, T. (2009, Summer). A child could do it. Cabinet, 34. Retrieved on April 10, 2017, from http://cabinetmagazine.org/issues/34/holert.php.Google Scholar
Huntsinger, C. S., Schoeneman, J., & Ching, W. D. (1994). A cross-cultural study of young children’s performance on drawing and handwriting tasks. Paper presented at the conference of the Midwestern Psychological Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Husslein-Arco, A., & Koja, S. (2010). Lovis Corinth: A feast of painting. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Inzelberg, R. (2013). The awakening of artistic creativity and Parkinson’s disease. Behavioral Neuroscience, 127(2), 256.Google Scholar
Jellen, H., and Urban, K. K. (1988). Assessing creative potential world-wide: The first cross- cultural application of the TCT-DP. Creative Child and Adult Quarterly, 14, 151–167.Google Scholar
Jaarsveld, S., & Leeuwen, C. (2005). Sketches from a design process: Creative cognition inferred from intermediate products. Cognitive Science, 29(1), 79–101.Google Scholar
Jackson, P. W., & Messick, S. (1965). The person, the product, and the response: Conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality, 33(3), 309–329.Google Scholar
Jarosewich, T., Pfeiffer, S., & Morris, J. (2002). Identifying gifted students using teacher rating scales: A review of existing instruments. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 20, 322–336.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2012). Counting the muses: Development of the Kaufman Domains of Creativity Scale (K-DOCS). Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 6(4), 298.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2004). Sure, I’m creative – but not in mathematics!: Self-reported creativity in diverse domains. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 143–155.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2005). The amusement park theory of creativity. In Kaufman, J. C. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains: Faces of the muse (pp. 321–328). New York, NY: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Baer, J. (2012). Beyond new and appropriate: Who decides what is creative? Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 83–91.Google Scholar
Kaufman, J., Cole, J., & Baer, J. (2009). The construct of creativity: Structural model for self-reported creativity ratings. Journal of Creative Behavior, 43, 119–134.Google Scholar
Kay, S. (1991). The figural problem solving and problem finding of professional and semi-professional artists and non-artists. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 233–252.Google Scholar
Khatena, J., & Torrance, E. (1976). Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. Chicago, IL: Stoelting.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance tests of creative thinking (TTCT). Creativity Research Journal, 18, 3–14.Google Scholar
Kowatari, Y., Lee, S. H., Yamamura, H., Nagamori, Y., Levy, P., Yamane, S. et al. (2009). Neural networks involved in artistic creativity. Human Brain Mapping, 30, 1678–1690.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Originality and technical skill as components of artistic quality. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 22, 157–170.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A., & Serafin, J. (2009). Dynamic evaluation of high-and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters. Creativity Research Journal, 21(4), 349–360.Google Scholar
Kottlow, M., Praeg, E., Luethy, C., & Jancke, L. (2011). Artists’ advance: Decreased upper alpha power while drawing in artists compared with non-artists. Brain Topography, 23(4), 392–402.Google Scholar
Kulisevsky, J., Pagonabarraga, J., & Martinez-Corral, M. (2009). Changes in artistic style and behaviour in Parkinson’s disease: Dopamine and creativity. Journal of Neurology, 256, 816–819.Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2013). Next steps in neuroaesthetics: Which processes and processing stages to study? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 27–37.Google Scholar
Leder, H. (2014). Beyond perception – Information processing approaches to art appreciation. In Tinio, P. P. L. & Smith, J. K. (Eds), The Cambridge handbook of the psychology of aesthetics and the arts (pp. 115–138). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leder, H., Belke, B., Oeberst, A., & Augustin, D. (2004). A model of aesthetic appreciation and aesthetic judgments. British Journal of Psychology, 95, 489–508.Google Scholar
Lemons, G. (2011). Diverse perspectives of creativity testing controversial issues when used for inclusion into gifted programs. Journal for the Education of the Gifted, 34(5), 742–772.Google Scholar
Li, J. (1997). Creativity in horizontal and vertical domains. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 107–132.Google Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Creativity across time and place: Life span and cross-cultural perspective. High Ability Studies, 9, 59–74.Google Scholar
Ludington, C. (1965). Creativity and conformity: A problem for organizations. Ann Arbor, MI: Foundation for Research on Human Behavior.Google Scholar
Lundy, D. E. (2012). Degrees of quality: A method for quantifying aesthetic impact. Psychology Research, 2(4), 205–221.Google Scholar
Marks, D. F. (1973). Visual imagery differences in the recall of pictures. British Journal of Psychology, 64(1), 17–24.Google Scholar
McKelvie, S. J. (1995). The VVIQ as a psychometric test of individual differences in visual imagery vividness: A critical quantitative review and plea for direction. Journal of Mental Imagery, 19, 1–106.Google Scholar
McManus, I. C., Chamberlain, R., Loo, P. W., Rankin, Q., Riley, H., & Brunswick, N. (2010). Art students who cannot draw: Exploring the relations between drawing ability, visual memory, accuracy of copying, and dyslexia. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 4(1), 18.Google Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review, 69, 220–232.Google Scholar
Meeker, M., & Meeker, R. (1985). Structure of intellect learning abilities test. Los Angeles, CA: Western Psychological Services.Google Scholar
Mell, J. C., Howard, S. M., & Miller, B. L. (2003) Art and the brain: The influence of frontotemporal dementia on an accomplished artist. Neurology, 60, 1707–1710.Google Scholar
Meyers, J. E., & Meyers, K. R. (1995). Rey Complex figure test and recognition trial. Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
Miall, R. C., & Tchalenko, J. (2001). A painter’s eye movements: A study of eye and hand movement during portrait drawing. Leonardo, 34(1), 35–40.Google Scholar
Midorikawa, A., Fukutake, T., & Kawamura, M. (2008). Dementia and painting in patients from different cultural backgrounds. European Neurology, 60(5), 224–229.Google Scholar
Milbrath, C. (1998). Patterns of artistic development in children: Comparative studies of talent. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., & Hou, C. E. (2004). Portraits of artists: emergence of visual creativity in dementia. Archives of Neurology, 61(6), 842–844.Google Scholar
Miller, B. L., Ponton, M., Benson, D. F., Cummings, J. L., & Mena, I. (1996). Enhanced artistic creativity with temporal lobe degeneration. The Lancet, 348(9043), 1744–1745.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. T. J. (1987). Iconology; image, text, ideology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, D. W., Bhadelia, R., Billings, R., Fulwiler, D., Heilman, K. M., Rood, K. M. J. et al. (2009). Hemispheric connectivity and the visual-spatial divergent thinking component of creativity. Brain and Cognition, 70(3), 267–272.Google Scholar
Moran, J. D. III, Milgram, R. M., Sawyers, J. K., & Fu, V. R. (1983). Original thinking in preschool children. Child Development, 54(4), 921–926.Google Scholar
Mottron, L., Belleville, S., & Ménard, E. (1999). Local bias in autistic subjects as evidenced by graphic tasks: Perceptual hierarchization or working memory deficit? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 40(05), 743–755.Google Scholar
Myszkowski, N., Storme, M., Zenasni, F., & Lubart, T. (2014). Is visual aesthetic sensitivity independent from intelligence, personality and creativity? Personality and Individual Differences, 59, 16–20.Google Scholar
Niu, W. H., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225–241.Google Scholar
Palmiero, M., Di Giacomo, D., & Passafiume, D. (2012). Creativity and dementia: A review. Cognitive Processing, 13(3), 193–209.Google Scholar
Palmiero, M., Nakatani, C., Raver, D., Belardinelli, M. O., & van Leeuwen, C. (2010). Abilities within and across visual and verbal domains: How specific is their influence on creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 369–377.Google Scholar
Pelowski, M., & Akiba, F. (2011). A model of art perception, evaluation and emotion in transformative aesthetic experience. New Ideas in Psychology, 29(2), 80–97.Google Scholar
Pérez-Fabello, M. J., & Campos, A. (2007). The influence of imaging capacity on visual art skills. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 2(2), 128–135.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal data. Creativity Research Journal, 12, 103–114.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. A. (2005). The (relatively) generalist view of creativity. In Kaufman, J. & Baer, J. (Eds.), Creativity across domains (pp. 307–312). Mahway, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rankin, K. P., Liu, A. A., Howard, S., Slama, H., Hou, C. E., Shuster, K., & Miller, B. L. (2007). A case-controlled study of altered visual art production in Alzheimer’s and FTLD. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology: Official Journal of the Society for Behavioral and Cognitive Neurology, 20(1), 48.Google Scholar
Rawlings, D., & Locarnini, A. (2007). Validating the creativity scale for diverse domains using groups of artists and scientists. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 25(2), 163–172.Google Scholar
Renzulli, J. S., Smith, L., White, A., Callahan, C., & Hartman, R. (1976). Scales for rating the behavioral characteristics of superior students. Mansfield Center, CT: Creative Learning Press.Google Scholar
Rimm, S., & Davis, G. A. (1980). Five years of international research with GIFT: An instrument for the identification of creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 14, 35–46.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (1997). A study of young artists: The development of talent and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 175–192.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (1998). The development of artistic talent and creativity: An evolving systems approach. AGATE (Journal of the Gifted and Talented Education Council of the Alberta Teachers’ Association), 12(2), 15–25.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (2005). Educational intervention and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Journal of Creative Behavior, 39, 237–283.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M. (2010). Studio learning: Motivation, competence, and the development of young art students’ talent and creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 22(3), 261–271.Google Scholar
Rostan, S. M., Pariser, D., & Gruber, H. E. (2002). A cross-cultural study of the development of artistic talent, creativity, and giftedness. High Ability Studies, 13, 125–156.Google Scholar
Roy, D. D. (1996). Personality model of fine artists. Creativity Research Journal, 9(4), 391–394.Google Scholar
Rudowicz, E., Lok, D., & Kitto, J. (1995). Use of the Torrance tests of creative thinking in an exploratory study of creativity in Hong Kong primary school children: A cross-cultural comparison. International Journal of Psychology, 30, 417–430.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A. (1987). Interrater agreement on a socially valid measure of students’ creativity. Psychological Reports, 61, 1009–1010.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Chand, I. (1995). Cognition and creativity. Educational Psychology Review, 7, 243–267.Google Scholar
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal, 22(4), 361–368.Google Scholar
Sawyers, J. K., & Canestaro, N. C. (1989). Creativity and achievement in design coursework. Creativity Research Journal, 2(1–2), 126–133.Google Scholar
Schaefer, C. E., & Anastasi, A. (1968). A biographical inventory for identifying creativity in adolescent boys. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 42–48.Google Scholar
Schraw, G. (2005). Review of the Khatena-Torrance Creative Perception Inventory. In Spies, R. & Plake, B. (Eds.), The sixteenth mental measurements yearbook (pp. 542–543). Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press.Google Scholar
Serafin, J., Kozbelt, A., Seidel, A., & Dolese, M. (2011). Dynamic evaluation of high-and low-creativity drawings by artist and nonartist raters: Replication and methodological extension. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 5(4), 350–359.Google Scholar
Serrano, C., Allegri, R. F., Martelli, M., Taragano, F., & Rinalli, P. (2005). Visual art, creativity and dementia. Vertex 16(64), 418–429.Google Scholar
Sessa, B. (2008). Is it time to revisit the role of psychedelic drugs in enhancing human creativity? Journal of Psychopharmacology, 22, 821–827.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Berg, C., Martin, C., & O’Connor, A. (2009). Openness to experience, plasticity, and creativity: Exploring lower-order, high-order, and interactive effects. Journal of Research in Personality, 43(6), 1087–1090.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2009). Is creativity domain-specific? Latent class models of creative accomplishments and creative self-descriptions. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 3(3), 139.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Artistic creativity and interpersonal relationships across and within generations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1273–1286.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1996). Creative expertise: A life-span developmental perspective. In Ericsson, K. A. (Ed.), The road to excellence: The acquisition of expert performance in the arts and sciences, sports, and games (pp. 227–253). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc.Google Scholar
Solso, R. L. (2001). Brain activities in an expert versus a novice artist: An fMRI study. Leonardo, 34, 31–34.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. (2002). “Creativity as decision”: Comment. American Psychologist, 57, 376.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R.J., & Lubart, T.I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3–15). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Stevenson-Taylor, A. G., & Mansell, W. (2012). Exploring the role of art-making in recovery, change, and self-understanding: An interpretative phenomenological analysis of interviews with everyday creative people. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 4(3), 104.Google Scholar
Taylor, C. W., & and Ellison, R. L. (1968). The Alpha Biographial Inventory. Greensboro, NC: Prediction Press.Google Scholar
Tinio, P. P. (2013). From artistic creation to aesthetic reception: The mirror model of art. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(3), 265–275.Google Scholar
Toku, M. (2001). Cross-cultural analysis of artistic development: Drawings by Japanese and U.S. children. Visual Arts Research, 27, 46–59.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1966). Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms-technical manual. Princeton, NY: Personnel Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1969). Curiosity of gifted children and performances on timed and untimed tests of creativity. Gifted Child Quarterly, 13, 155–158.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1988). The nature of creativity as manifest in its testing. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), The nature of creativity (pp. 43–75). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Torrance, E.P. (1999). Torrance Test of Creative Thinking: Norms and technical manual. Beaconville, IL: Scholastic Testing Services.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P., & Goff, K. (1989). A quiet revolution. Journal of Creative Behavior, 23, 136–145.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K. (1991). Recent trends in creativity research and theory in Western Europe. European Journal of High Ability, 1(1), 99–113.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K. (2004). Assessing creativity: The test for creative thinking-drawing production (TCT-DP) the concept, application, evaluation, and international studies. Psychology Science, 46(3), 387–397.Google Scholar
Urban, K. K., & Jellen, H. G. (1996). Test for Creative Thinking – Drawing Production (TCT-DP). Lisse: Swets and Zeitlinger.Google Scholar
Verstijnen, I. M., van Leeuwen, C., Goldschmidt, G., Hamel, R., & Hennessey, J. M. (1998). Creative discovery in imagery and perception: Combining is relatively easy, restructuring takes a sketch. Acta Psychologica, 99(2), 177–200.Google Scholar
Vinacke, W. E. (1952). The psychology of thinking. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of thinking in young children. New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (1994). Structured imagination: The role of category structure in exemplar generation. Cognitive psychology, 27(1), 1–40.Google Scholar
Weintraub, D., & Nirenberg, M. J. (2012). Impulse control and related disorders in Parkinson’s disease. Neurodegenerative Diseases, 11(2), 63–71.Google Scholar
Westphal-Fitch, G., Oh, J., & Fitch, W. (2013). Studying aesthetics with the method of production: Effects of context and local symmetry. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 13–26.Google Scholar
Williams, F. (1980). Creativity assessment packet. Buffalo, NY: DOK.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (1989). Development in the visual arts. In Damon, W. (Ed.), Child development today and tomorrow (pp. 199–221). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
Yamamoto, K. (1964). Experimental scoring manuals for the Minnesota test of creative thinking and writing. OH: Kent State University.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W. (2010). Art and brain: Insights from neuropsychology, biology and evolution. Journal of Anatomy, 216(2), 177–183.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W. (2014). Creativity, brain, and art: Biological and neurological considerations. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 8(389), 1–9.Google Scholar
Zaidel, D. W., Nadal, M., Flexas, A., & Munar, E. (2013). An evolutionary approach to art and aesthetic experience. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7(1), 100.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×