Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Biomechanics
- Cross-cultural comparisons
- Cross-species comparisons
- Developmental testing
- Experimental methods
- Eye tracking
- Fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography
- Fetal ultrasonography
- Head-mounted eye tracking
- Interviewing children for research
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
- Direct observational methods
- Parent and teacher rating scales
- Qualitative methods
- Self-reports and peer ratings
- Epidemiological designs
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional designs
- Twin and related designs
- Bayesian data analysis
- Connectionist modeling
- Individual and group differences in developmental functions
- Indicators of accuracy for screening tests
- Multilevel modeling
- Structural equation modeling
- Time-series analysis
- Ethical considerations in studies with children
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Fetal ultrasonography
from Part II - Methods in child development research
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 26 October 2017
Book contents
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development
- Child Development
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Contributors
- Editorial preface
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments: External Reviewers
- Introduction Study of child development: an interdisciplinary enterprise
- Part I Theories of development
- Part II Methods in child development research
- Biomechanics
- Cross-cultural comparisons
- Cross-species comparisons
- Developmental testing
- Experimental methods
- Eye tracking
- Fetal and neonatal magnetoencephalography
- Fetal ultrasonography
- Head-mounted eye tracking
- Interviewing children for research
- Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
- Functional near-infrared spectroscopy
- Direct observational methods
- Parent and teacher rating scales
- Qualitative methods
- Self-reports and peer ratings
- Epidemiological designs
- Longitudinal and cross-sectional designs
- Twin and related designs
- Bayesian data analysis
- Connectionist modeling
- Individual and group differences in developmental functions
- Indicators of accuracy for screening tests
- Multilevel modeling
- Structural equation modeling
- Time-series analysis
- Ethical considerations in studies with children
- Part III Prenatal development and the newborn
- Part IV Perceptual and cognitive development
- Part V Language and communication development
- Part VI Social and emotional development
- Part VII Motor and related development
- Part VIII Postnatal brain development
- Part IX Developmental pathology
- Part X Crossing the borders
- Part XI Speculations about future directions
- Book part
- Author Index
- Subject Index
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Child Development , pp. 107 - 112Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Further reading
Chudleigh, T., & Thilaganathan, B. (Eds.) (2004). Obstetric ultrasound: How, why and when (3rd ed.). London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Coady, A.M., & Bower, S. (Eds.) (2014). Twining’s textbook of fetal abnormalities (2nd ed.). London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Malinger, G., Monteagudo, A., Pilu, G., Timor-Tritsch, I., & Toi, A. (2007). Sonographic examination of the fetal central nervous system: Guidelines for performing the “basic examination” and the “fetal neurosonogram”. Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology 29, 109–116.Google Scholar
References
Abo-Yaqoub, S., Kurjak, A., Mohammed, A.B., Shadad, A., & Abdel-Maaboud, M. (2012). The role of 4-D ultrasonography in prenatal assessment of fetal neurobehaviour and prediction of neurological outcome. Journal of Maternal & Fetal Neonatal Medicine, 25, 231–236.Google Scholar
Anderson, G.M., Jacobs-Stannard, A., Chawarska, K., Volkmar, F.R., & Kliman, H.J. (2007). Placental trophoblast inclusions in autism spectrum disorder. Biological Psychiatry, 61, 487–491.Google Scholar
Baschat, A.A., Viscardi, R.M., Hussey-Gardner, B., Hashmi, N., & Harman, C. (2009). Infant neurodevelopment following fetal growth restriction: Relationship with antepartum surveillance parameters. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 33, 44–50.Google Scholar
Blair, E., de Groot, J., & Nelson, K.B. (2011). Placental infarction identified by macroscopic examination and risk of cerebral palsy in infants at 35 weeks of gestational age and over. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 205, 124 e121–127.Google Scholar
Bonifacio, S.L., Glass, H.C., Vanderpluym, J., Agrawal, A.T., Xu, D., Barkovich, A.J., & Ferriero, D.M. (2011). Perinatal events and early magnetic resonance imaging in therapeutic hypothermia. Journal of Pediatrics, 158, 360–365.Google Scholar
Chan, F.Y., Pun, T.C., Lam, P., Lam, C., Lee, C.P., & Lam, Y.H. (1996). Fetal cerebral Doppler studies as a predictor of perinatal outcome and subsequent neurologic handicap. Obstetrics & Gynecology, 87, 981–988.Google Scholar
Donald, I., Macvicar, J., & Brown, T.G. (1958). Investigation of abdominal masses by pulsed ultrasound. Lancet, 1, 1188–1195.Google Scholar
Eixarch, E., Meler, E., Iraola, A., Illa, M., Crispi, F., Hernandez-Andrade, E., & Figueras, F. (2008). Neurodevelopmental outcome in 2-year-old infants who were small-for-gestational age term fetuses with cerebral blood flow redistribution. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 32, 894–899.Google Scholar
Figueras, F., Eixarch, E., Meler, E., Iraola, A., Figueras, J., Puerto, B., & Gratacos, E. (2008). Small-for-gestational-age fetuses with normal umbilical artery Doppler have suboptimal perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome. European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology, 136, 34–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Griffiths, P.D., Porteous, M., Mason, G., Russell, S., Morris, J., Fanou, E.M., & Reeves, M.J. (2012). The use of in utero MRI to supplement ultrasound in the foetus at high risk of developmental brain or spine abnormality. British Journal of Radiology, 85, e1038–1045.Google Scholar
James, D.K., Telfer, F.M., Keating, N.A., Blair, M.E., Wilcox, M.A., & Chilvers, C. (2000). Reduced fetal movements and maternal medication: New pregnancy risk factors for neurodevelopmental disability in childhood. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 20, 226–234.Google Scholar
Laskin, M.D., Kingdom, J., Toi, A., Chitayat, D., & Ohlsson, A. (2005). Perinatal and neurodevelopmental outcome with isolated fetal ventriculomegaly: A systematic review. Journal of Maternal & Fetal Neonatal Medicine, 18, 289–298.Google Scholar
Melchiorre, K., Bhide, A., Gika, A.D., Pilu, G., & Papageorghiou, A.T. (2009). Counseling in isolated mild fetal ventriculomegaly. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 34, 212–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ouahba, J., Luton, D., Vuillard, E., Garel, C., Gressens, P., Blanc, N., & Oury, J.F. (2006). Prenatal isolated mild ventriculomegaly: Outcome in 167 cases. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 113, 1072–1079.Google Scholar
Proctor, L.K., Whittle, W.L., Keating, S., Viero, S., & Kingdom, J.C. (2010). Pathologic basis of echogenic cystic lesions in the human placenta: Role of ultrasound-guided wire localization. Placenta, 31, 1111–1115.Google Scholar
Savchev, S., Sanz-Cortes, M., Cruz-Martinez, R., Arranz, A., Botet, F., Gratacos, E., & Figueras, F. (2013). Neurodevelopmental outcome of full-term small-for-gestational-age infants with normal placental function. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 42, 201–206.Google Scholar
Scherjon, S., Briet, J., Oosting, H., & Kok, J. (2000). The discrepancy between maturation of visual-evoked potentials and cognitive outcome at five years in very preterm infants with and without hemodynamic signs of fetal brain-sparing. Pediatrics, 105, 385–391.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Signorelli, M., Tiberti, A., Valseriati, D., Molin, E., Cerri, V., Groli, C., & Bianchi, U.A. (2004). Width of the fetal lateral ventricular atrium between 10 and 12 mm: A simple variation of the norm? Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology, 23, 14–18.Google Scholar
Toal, M., Keating, S., Machin, G., Dodd, J., Adamson, S.L., Windrim, R.C., & Kingdom, J.C. (2008). Determinants of adverse perinatal outcome in high-risk women with abnormal uterine artery Doppler images. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 198, 330 e1e7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Valcamonico, A., Danti, L., Frusca, T., Soregaroli, M., Zucca, S., Abrami, F., & Tiberti, A. (1994). Absent end-diastolic velocity in umbilical artery: Risk of neonatal morbidity and brain damage. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 170, 796–801.Google Scholar
Vossbeck, S., de Camargo, O.K., Grab, D., Bode, H., & Pohlandt, F. (2001). Neonatal and neurodevelopmental outcome in infants born before 30 weeks of gestation with absent or reversed end-diastolic flow velocities in the umbilical artery. European Journal of Pediatrics, 160, 128–134.Google ScholarPubMed
Walker, D.M., Marlow, N., Upstone, L., Gross, H., Hornbuckle, J., Vail, A., & Thornton, J.G. (2011). The Growth Restriction Intervention Trial: Long-term outcomes in a randomized trial of timing of delivery in fetal growth restriction. American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology, 204, 34 e31–39.Google Scholar
Whitby, E.H., Paley, M.N., Sprigg, A., Rutter, S., Davies, N.P., Wilkinson, I.D., & Griffiths, P.D. (2004). Comparison of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in 100 singleton pregnancies with suspected brain abnormalities. British Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology, 111, 784–792.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wienerroither, H., Steiner, H., Tomaselli, J., Lobendanz, M., & Thun-Hohenstein, L. (2001). Intrauterine blood flow and long-term intellectual, neurologic, and social development. Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 97, 449–453.Google ScholarPubMed