Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-sh8wx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T12:59:09.721Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

By
Torben Spaak  and
Patricia Mindus
Edited by
Torben Spaak  and
Patricia Mindus
Torben Spaak
Affiliation:
Stockholms Universitet
Patricia Mindus
Affiliation:
Uppsala Universitet, Sweden
Get access

Summary

Much has been said about legal positivism. Yet, given the lack of clarity as to what, exactly, it stands, or should stand, for, more is to be said, not only about what legal positivism is, or might be, and its different types but also about its different geographical traditions, central figures, fundamental tenets, meta-ethical underpinnings, if any, the problem of legal normativity considered within the framework of legal positivism, the value or disvalue of law positivistically conceived and of positivistic legal arrangements, and, of course, about the perceived problems of legal positivism, such as its alleged totalitarian implications. This is what this book does and this Introduction explains how. We attempt to provide a fuller and more adequate characterisation of legal positivism than just saying that legal positivists reject the view that there is a necessary connection between law and morality, and we identify certain important types of legal positivism. What is offered in this volume is a rather comprehensive and systematic discussion by experts in the field; this Introduction thus also illustrates the authors’ contributions to the various topics examined.

Keywords

legal positivismnature of lawdifferent traditionscentral figuresobjection to legal positivism
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Companion to Legal Positivism , pp. 1 - 36
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alexy, R. 2002. The Argument from Injustice: A Reply to Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. [1832]1998. The Province of Jurisprudence Determined and The Uses of the Study of Jurisprudence. With an Introduction by H.L.A. Hart. Hackett.Google Scholar
Bentham, J. [1776]1988. A Fragment on Government: The New Authoritative Edition by J.H. Burns and H.L.A Hart. With an Introduction by R. Harrison. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bratman, M. E. 2011. ‘Reflections on Law, Normativity and Plans’. In Bertea, S. and Pavlakos, G. (eds.). New Essays on the Normativity of Law. Hart Publishing: 73–85.Google Scholar
Burazin, L. 2017. ‘The Concept of Law and Efficacy’. In Sellers, M. and Kirste, S. (eds.). Encyclopedia of the Philosophy of Law and Social Philosophy. Springer: 1–7.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. L. 1982. ‘Negative and Positive Positivism’. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 139–64.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. L. 2001. The Practice of Principle. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. L. 2009. ‘Beyond Inclusive Legal Positivism’. Ratio Juris 22: 359–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duarte D’Almeida, L. 2011. ‘Legal Statements and Normative Language’. Law and Philosophy 30: 167–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. 2nd ed. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s Empire. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Fuller, L. 1958. ‘Positivism and Fidelity to Law: A Reply to Professor Hart’. Harvard Law Review 71: 630–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gardner, J. 2012. ‘Legal Positivism: 5½Myths’. In Gardner, J.. Law as a Leap of Faith. Oxford University Press: 19–53.Google Scholar
Green, L. 2008. ‘The Inseparability of Law and Morality’. New York University Law Review 83: 1035–58.Google Scholar
Green, L. 2018. ‘Legal Positivism’. In Zalta, E. N. (ed.). The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/spr2018/entries/legal-positivism/.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1958. ‘Positivism and the Separation of Law and Morals’. Harvard Law Review 71: 593–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1961. The Concept of Law. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1982. Essays on Bentham. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994. The Concept of Law with a Postscript. Eds. Bulloch, P. A. and Raz, J.. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Holmes, O. W. 1896–7. ‘The Path of the Law’. Harvard Law Review 10: 457–78.Google Scholar
Honoré, T. 1987. Making Law Bind. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1948. ‘Absolutism and Relativism in Philosophy and Politics’. The American Political Science Review 42: 906–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1959–60. ‘What Is the Pure Theory of Law?’. Tulane Law Review 34: 269–76.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1960. Reine Rechtslehre. 2nd ed. Österreichische Staatsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1992. Introduction to the Problems of Legal Theory. Trans. Paulson, B. Litschewski and Paulson, S. L.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kelsen, H. 1999. General Theory of Law and State. Trans. Wedberg, A.. The Lawbook Exchange.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. H. 1999. In Defense of Legal Positivism: Law without Trimmings. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, M. H. 2009. Moral Realism as a Moral Doctrine. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Lyons, D. 1977. ‘Principles, Positivism and Legal Theory: Dworkin “Taking Rights Seriously”’. Yale Law Journal 87: 415–35.Google Scholar
MacCormick, N. 1987. ‘Comments’. In Gavison, R. (ed.). Issues in Contemporary Legal Philosophy: The Influence of H.L.A. Hart. Oxford University Press: 105–13.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1977a. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. 1977b. ‘The Third Theory of Law’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Affairs 7: 3–16.Google Scholar
Marmor, A. 2011. ‘The Conventional Foundations of Law’. In Bertea, S. and Pavlakos, G. (eds.). New Essays on the Normativity of Law. Hart Publishing: 143–57.Google Scholar
Olivecrona, K. 1971. Law as Fact. 2nd ed. Stevens & Sons.Google Scholar
Paulson, S. L. 2012. ‘A “Justified Normativity” Thesis in Hans Kelsen’s Pure Theory of Law?’ In Klatt, M. (ed.). Institutionalized Reason: The Jurisprudence of Robert Alexy. Oxford University Press: 61–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perry, S. R. 2001. ‘Hart’s Methodological Positivism’. In Coleman, J. L. (ed.). Hart’s Postscript: Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press: 311–54.Google Scholar
Postema, G. 1982. ‘Coordination and Convention at the Foundation of Law’. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 165–203.Google Scholar
Radbruch, G. 2006. ‘Statutory Lawlessness and Supra-Statutory Law’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 26: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1980. The Concept of a Legal System. 2nd ed. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1983. ‘Hart on Moral Rights and Legal Duties’. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 4: 123–31.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1986. ‘Dworkin: A New Link in the Chain’. California Law Review 74: 1103–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raz, J. 1990. Practical Reason and Norms. 2nd ed. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 1999. ‘Moral Change and Social Relativism’. In Raz, J.. Engaging Reason: On the Theory of Value and Action. Oxford University Press: 161–81.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2001. ‘Universality and Difference’. In Raz, J.. Value, Respect, and Attachment. Cambridge University Press: 41–76.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2007. ‘The Argument from Justice, or How Not to Reply to Legal Positivism’. In Pavlakos, G. (ed.). Law, Rights and Discourse. Hart Publishing: 17–35.Google Scholar
Raz, J. 2009. ‘Legal Positivism and the Sources of Law’. In Raz, J.. The Authority of Law. 2nd ed. Oxford University Press: 37–52.Google Scholar
Ross, A. 1959. On Law and Justice. University of California Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, S. 2011. ‘Planning Agency and the Law’. In Bertea, S. and Pavlakos, G. (eds.). New Essays on the Normativity of Law. Hart Publishing: 17–72.Google Scholar
Simmonds, N. 2002. Central Issues in Jurisprudence. 2nd ed. Sweet & Maxwell.Google Scholar
Soper, P. 1977. ‘Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute’. Michigan Law Review 75: 473–519.Google Scholar
Van Roojen, M. 2015. Metaethics: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, J. 2001. ‘Normative (or Ethical) Positivism’. In Coleman, J. L. (ed.). Essays on the Postscript to the Concept of Law. Oxford University Press: 411–33.Google Scholar
Waluchow, W. J. 1994. Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B. 1973. A Critique of Utilitarianism. In Smart, J. C. C. and Williams, B. (eds.). Utilitarianism: For and Against. Cambridge University Press: 75–150.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1960. The Blue and Brown Books. 2nd ed. Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1968. Philosophical Investigations. 3rd ed. Eds. Anscombes, G. E. M. and Rhees, R.. Trans. Anscombe, G. E. M.. Macmillan.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×