Responses of Epiphytic Bryophyte Communities to Simulated Climate Change in the Tropics

Jorge Jácome; S. Robbert Gradstein; Michael Kessler

doi:10.1017/CBO9780511779701.011

10 - Responses of Epiphytic Bryophyte Communities to Simulated Climate Change in the Tropics

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 October 2012

Jorge Jácome ,

S. Robbert Gradstein and

Edited by

Nancy G. Slack and

Jorge Jácome: Affiliation:
Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Colombia
S. Robbert Gradstein: Affiliation:
University of Göttingen, Germany
Michael Kessler: Affiliation:
University of Zürich, Switzerland
Nancy G. Slack: Affiliation:
Sage Colleges, New York
Lloyd R. Stark: Affiliation:
University of Nevada, Las Vegas

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

Epiphytes are known to respond sensitively to environmental changes. Because of the tight coupling of epiphytes to atmospheric conditions, changes in the chemical and physical conditions of the atmosphere may be expected to have direct effects on epiphytes (Farmer et al. 1992; Benzing 1998; Zotz & Bader 2009). In temperate regions, non-vascular epiphytes (bryophytes, lichens) have frequently been used as bioindicators of air quality (Hawksworth & Rose 1970). Owing to the lack of a protective cuticle in many bryophytes and lichens, solutions and gases may enter freely into the living tissues of these plants causing sensitive reactions to changes in the environment. By mapping and monitoring the distribution and abundance of non-vascular epiphytes, changes in environmental conditions can be assessed (Van Dobben & De Bakker 1996; Szczepaniak & Biziuk 2003).

Tropical moist forests, especially mountain forests, are very rich in epiphytes, both vascular and non-vascular. In the Reserva Biológica San Francisco, a small mountain rain forest reserve of approximately 1000 hectares in the Andes of southern Ecuador, about 1200 species of epiphytes have been recorded, with more than half of these bryophytes and lichens (Liede-Schumann & Breckle 2008). About one of every two species of plant in the forests is an epiphyte. The almost constantly saturated air in these mountain forests, due to orographic clouds, mist, and frequent rainfall, allows the epiphytic plants to thrive year-round high up on the trees, favoring high species diversity.

Type: Chapter
Information: Bryophyte Ecology and Climate Change , pp. 191 - 208

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511779701.011 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Acebey, C., Gradstein, S. R. & Krömer, T. (2003). Species richness and habitat diversification of bryophytes in submontane rain forest and fallows of Bolivia. Journal of Tropical Ecology 19: 9–18.Google Scholar

Andrew, N. R. & Hughes, L. (2005). Diversity and assemblage structure of phytophagous Hemiptera along a latitudinal gradient: predicting the potential impacts of climate change. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14: 249–62.Google Scholar

Aryanti, N. S., Bos, M. M., Kartawiniata, K., et al. (2008). Bryophytes on tree trunks in natural forests, selectively logged forests and cacao agroforests in Central Sulawesi, Indonesia. Biological Conservation 141: 2516–27.Google Scholar

Bach, K. (2004). Vegetationskundliche Untersuchungen zur Höhenzonierung tropischer Bergregenwälder in den Anden Boliviens. Marburg: Görich und Weiershäuser Verlag.

Bazzaz, F. A. (1998). Tropical forests in a future climate: changes in biological diversity and impact on the global carbon cycle. Climatic Change 39: 317–36.Google Scholar

Benzing, D. H. (1998). Vulnerabilities of tropical forests to climate change: the significance of resident epiphytes. Climatic Change 39: 519–40.Google Scholar

Buckland, S. M., Grime, J. P., Hodgson, J. G.et al. (1997). A comparison of plant responses to the extreme drought of 1995 in northern England. Journal of Ecology 85: 875–82.Google Scholar

Cavelier, J., Solis, D. & Jaramillo, M. A. (1996). Fog interception in montane forest across the central cordillera of Panamá. Journal of Tropical Ecology 12: 357–69.Google Scholar

Chen, J., Carlson, B. E. & Del Genio, A. D. (2002). Evidence for strengthening of the tropical general circulation in the 1990s. Science 295: 838–41.Google Scholar

Churchill, A. P., Griffin, D. & Muñoz, J. (2000). A checklist of the mosses of the tropical Andean countries. Ruizia 17: 1–203.Google Scholar

Cornelissen, J. H. & Steege, H. (1989). Distribution and ecology of epiphytic bryophytes and lichens in dry evergreen forest of Guyana. Journal of Tropical Ecology 5: 29–35.Google Scholar

Coxson, D. & Nadkarni, N. M. (1995). Ecological roles of epiphytes in nutrient cycles of forest ecosystems. In Forest Canopies, ed. Lowman, M. D. and Nadkarni, N. M., pp. 495–543. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

Crawley, M. J. (2002). Statistical Computing. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

Davis, A. J., Jerkinson, L. S., Lawton, J. L.et al. (1998). Making mistakes when predicting shifts in species range in response to global warming. Nature 391: 783–6.Google Scholar

Farmer, A. M., Bates, J. W. & Bell, J. N. B. (1992). Ecophysiological effects of acid rain on bryophytes and lichens. In Bryophytes and Lichens in a Changing Environment, ed. Bates, J. W. & Farmer, A. M., pp. 284–313. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Foster, P. (2001). The potential negative impacts of global climate change on tropical montane cloud forest. Earth-Science Reviews 55: 73–106.Google Scholar

Fowler, J., Cohen, L. & Jarvis, P. (1998). Practical Statistics for Field Biology. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.

Frahm, J.-P. & Klaus, D. (1997). Moose als Indikatoren von Klimafluktuationen in Mitteleuropa. Erdkunde 51: 181–90.Google Scholar

Frahm, J.-P. & Klaus, D. (2001). Bryophytes as indicators of recent climate fluctuations in Central Europe. Lindbergia 26: 97–104.Google Scholar

Gerold, G. (2008). Soil, climate and vegetation in tropical montane forests – a case study from the Yungas, Bolivia. In The Tropical Mountain Forest, Patterns and Processes in a Biodiversity Hotspot, ed. Gradstein, S. R., Homeier, J. & Gansert, D., pp. 137–62. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Gignac, L. D. (2001). Bryophytes as indicators of climatic change. Bryologist 104: 410–20.Google Scholar

Gradstein, S. R. (2008). Epiphytes of tropical montane forest – impact of deforestation and climate change. In The Tropical Mountain Forest – Patterns and Processes in a Biodiversity Hotspot, ed. Gradstein, S. R., Homeier, J. & Gansert, D., pp. 179–96. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Gradstein, S. R. & Sporn, S. G. (2009). Impact of forest conversion and climate change on bryophytes in the Tropics. Berichte der Reinhold-Tüxen-Gesellschaft 21: 128–41.Google Scholar

Gradstein, S. R., Churchill, S. P. & Salazar-Allen, N. (2001). Guide to the Bryophytes of Tropical America. Bronx, New York: The New York Botanical Garden Press.

Gradstein, S. R., Meneses, R. I. & Allain-Arbe, B. (2003). Catalogue of the Hepaticae and Anthocerotae of Bolivia. Journal of the Hattori Botanical Laboratory 93: 1–65.Google Scholar

Hanson, P. J. & Weltzin, J. F. (2000). Drought disturbance from climate change: responses of United States forests. Science of the Total Environment 262: 205–20.Google Scholar

Hawksworth, D. L. & Rose, F. (1970). Qualitative scale for estimating sulphur dioxide air pollution in England and Wales using epiphytic lichens. Nature 227: 145–8.Google Scholar

Heegaard, E. & Vandvik, V. (2004). Climate change affects the outcome of competitive interactions. An application of principal response curves. Oecologia 139: 459–66.Google Scholar

Henderson, A., Churchill, S. P. & Luteyn, J. L. (1991). Neotropical plant diversity. Nature 351: 21–2.Google Scholar

Hofstede, R. G. M., Wolf, J. H. D. & Benzing, D. H. (1993). Epiphytic biomass and nutrient status of a Colombian upper montane rain forest. Selbyana 14: 37–45.Google Scholar

Hollister, R. D., Webber, P. J. & Tweedie, C. E. (2005). The response of Alaskan artic tundra to experimental warming: differences between short- and long-term responses. Global Change Biology 11: 525–36.Google Scholar

Holz, I. & Gradstein, S. R. (2005). Cryptogamic epiphytes in primary and recovering upper montane oak forests of Costa Rica – species richness, community composition and ecology. Plant Ecology 178: 89–109.Google Scholar

Hughes, L. (2000). Biological consequences of global warming: is the signal already apparent? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 15: 56–61.Google Scholar

Johansson, D. (1974). Ecology of vascular epiphytes in West African rain forest. Acta Phytogeographica Suecica 59: 1–136.Google Scholar

Jónsdóttir, I. S., Magnússon, B., Gudmundsson, J.et al. (2005). Variable sensitivity of plant communities in Iceland to experimental warming. Global Change Biology 11: 553–63.Google Scholar

Kladerud, K. & Totland, Ø. (2005). The relative importance of neighbours and abiotic environmental conditions for population dynamic parameters of two alpine plant species. Journal of Ecology 93: 493–501.Google Scholar

Legendre, P. & Legendre, L. (1998). Numerical Ecology, 2nd English edn. Amsterdam: Elsevier.

Liede-Schumann, S. & Breckle, S.-W. eds. (2008). Provisional checklists of flora and fauna of the San Francisco Valley and its surroundings Reserva Biológica San Francisco, Province Zamora-Chinchipe, southern Ecuador. Ecotropical Monographs 4: 1–256.Google Scholar

Lovejoy, T. E. & Hannah, L. (2005). Climate Change and Biodiversity. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Magurran, A. E. (1988). Ecological Diversity and its Measurement. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRef

Malcolm, J. R., Liu, C., Neilson, R. P., Hansen, L. & Hannah, L. (2006). Global warming and extinction from biodiversity hotspots. Conservation Biology 20: 438–548.Google Scholar

Mosandl, R. & Günter, S. (2008). Sustainable management of tropical mountain forests in Ecuador. In The Tropical Mountain Forest – Patterns and Processes in a Biodiversity Hotspot, ed. Gradstein, S. R., Homeier, J. & Gansert, D., pp. 179–96. Göttingen: Universitätsverlag Göttingen.

Nadkarni, N. M. (1984). Epiphyte mats and nutrient capital of a neotropical elfin forest. Biotropica 16: 249–56.Google Scholar

Nadkarni, N. M. & Longino, J. T. (1990). Invertebrates in canopy and ground organic matter in a Neotropical montane forest. Biotropica 22: 358–63.Google Scholar

Nadkarni, N. M. & Solano, R. (2002). Potential effects of climate change on canopy communities in a tropical cloud forest: an experimental approach. Ecologia 131: 580–94.Google Scholar

Nöske, N., Hilt, N., Werner, F.et al. (2008). Disturbance effects on the diversity of epiphytes and moths in montane forest of Ecuador. Basic and Applied Ecology 9: 4–12.Google Scholar

Pearson, R. G. & Dawson, T. P. (2003). Predicting the impacts of climate change on the distribution of species: are bioclimate envelope models useful? Global Ecology & Biogeography 12: 361–71.Google Scholar

Pitelka, L. F., Gardner, R. H., Ash, J.et al. (1997). Plant migration and climate change. American Scientist 85: 464–73.Google Scholar

Pounds, J. A., Fogden, M. P. L. & Campbell, J. H. (1999). Biological response to climate change on a tropical mountain. Nature 398: 611–15.Google Scholar

Price, M. V. & Waser, N. M. (2000). Responses of subalpine meadow vegetation to four years of experimental warming. Ecological Applications 10: 811–23.Google Scholar

Sala, O. E., ChapinIII, F. S., Armesto, J. J.et al. (2000). Biodiversity – global biodiversity scenarios for the year 2100. Science 287: 1770–4.Google Scholar

Sporn, S. G., Bos, M. M., Hoffstätter-Müncheberg, M., Kessler, M. & Gradstein, S. R. (2009). Microclimate determines community composition but not richness of epiphytic understory bryophytes of rainforest and cacao agroforest in Indonesia. Functional Plant Biology 36: 171–9.Google Scholar

Statsoft, (2003). Statistica für Windows Software-system für Datenanalyse, Version 6. www.statsoft.com.

Steffan-Dewenter, I., Kessler, M., Barkman, J.et al. (2007). Socioeconomic context and ecological consequences of rainforest conversion and agroforestry intensification. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104: 4973–8.Google Scholar

Still, C. J., Foster, P. N. & Schneider, S. H. (1999). Simulating the effects of climate change on tropical montane forests. Nature 398: 608–10.Google Scholar

Szczepaniak, K. & Biziuk, M. (2003). Aspects of the biomonitoring studies using mosses and lichens as indicators of metal pollution. Environmental Research 93: 221–30.Google Scholar

Dobben, H. F. & Bakker, A. J. (1996). Re-mapping epiphytic lichen biodiversity in the Netherlands: effects of decreasing SO2 and increasing NH3. Acta Botanica Neerlandica 45: 55–71.Google Scholar

Herk, C. M., Aptroot, A. & Dobben, H. F. (2002). Long-term monitoring in the Netherlands suggests that lichens respond to global warming. The Lichenologist 34: 141–54.Google Scholar

Veneklaas, E. J., Zagt, R. J., Leerdam, A., et al. (1990). Hydrological properties of the epiphytic mass of a montane tropical rain forest, Colombia. Vegetatio 89: 183–92.Google Scholar

Vuille, M., Bradley, R. S., Werner, M.et al. (2003). 20th century climate change in the tropical Andes: observations and model results. Climatic Change 59: 75–99.Google Scholar

Walther, G., Post, E., Convey, P.et al. (2002). Ecological responses to recent climate change. Nature 416: 389–95.Google Scholar

Weltzin, J. F., Bridgham, S. D., Pastor, J.et al. (2003). Potential effects of warming and drying on peatland plant community composition. Global Change Biology 9: 141–51.Google Scholar

Woodward, F. I. (1992). A review of the effects of climate on vegetation: ranges, competition, and composition. In Global Warming and Biological Diversity, ed. Peters, R. J. & Lovejoy, T. J., pp. 105–23. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Yanoviak, S. P., Nadkarni, N. M. & Solano, R. (2007). Arthropod assemblages in epiphyte mats of Costa Rican cloud forest. Biotropica 36: 202–10.Google Scholar

Zar, J. H. (1999). Biostatistical Analysis, 4th edn. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

Zotz, G. & Bader, M. Y. (2008). Epiphytic plants in a changing world – global change effects on vascular and non-vascular epiphytes. Progress in Botany 70: 147–70.Google Scholar

Book contents

10 - Responses of Epiphytic Bryophyte Communities to Simulated Climate Change in the Tropics

Summary

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive