Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T01:25:26.588Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

6 - Fractal contours: chaos and system in the Romantic fragment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 July 2010

Richard Eldridge
Affiliation:
Swarthmore College, Pennsylvania
Get access

Summary

Ist nicht System die Form der Wissenschaft Chaos der Stoff? (Is it not the case that system constitutes the form of knowledge [and] chaos its material?)

Friedrich Schlegel, Philosophische Lehrjahre

Where chaos begins, classical science stops. For as long as the world has had physicists inquiring into the laws of nature, it had suffered a special ignorance about disorder in the atmosphere, in the turbulent sea, in the fluctuations of wildlife populations, in the oscillations of the heart and the brain. The irregular side of nature, the discontinuous and erratic side – these have been puzzles to science, or worse, monstrosities.

James Gleick, Chaos: Making a New Science

As a visual and conceptual metaphor, chaos represents a recurrent term in the critical writings of early German Romantics. Both Friedrich Schlegel and Novalis (Friedrich von Hardenberg), two prominent theorists of German Romanticism, define chaos as the condition for the possibility of all knowledge. Like a mirror-image that is neither essence nor representation, but an intangible and elusive form suspended in-between, a form necessary for self-(re)- cognition, chaos is an uncontainable and unrepresentable presence that is a precondition of any form of human cognition. Schlegel speculates that chaos may be the first, unconditional principle of system construction, a possible nickname for Fichte's “Ich” (self): “Self [Ich] and not-self [Nicht-Ich] perhaps identical with chaos and system and with spirit and letter.” In other words, chaos designates a higher metaphysics, an originary consciousness prior to systematic thought. In Schlegel's analogic formula, then, chaos corresponds to the first proposition of Fichte's analytic philosophy. As an absolute (spirit), chaos is unrepresentable and suprasensible.

Type
Chapter
Information
Beyond Representation
Philosophy and Poetic Imagination
, pp. 133 - 150
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×