Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
  • Print publication year: 2009
  • Online publication date: March 2010

Chapter 2 - The first stage of labour

Related content

Powered by UNSILO

References

1. Thomas J , Paranjothy S . Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists. Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit. The National Sentinel Caesarean Section Audit Report. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
2. Bewley S , Cockburn, I I . The unfacts of ‘request’ caesarean section. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2002; 109: 597–605.
3. Villar J , Carroli G , Zavaleta N , et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospectiveBr Med J 2007; 335: 1025.
4. Hemminki E , Merilainen L . Long term effects of cesarean section: ectopic pregnancies and placental problems. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1996; 174: 1569–74.
5. Philpott R H . Graphic records in labour. Br Med J 1972; iv: 163–5.
6. O'Driscoll K , Stronge J M , Minogue M . Active management of labour. Br Med J 1973; iii: 135–8.
7. Studd J W W . Partograms and nomograms in the management of primigravid labour. Br Med J 1973; iv: 451–5.
8. Ilancheran A , Lim S M , Ratnam S S . Nomograms of cervical dilatation in labour. Sing J Obstet Gynecol 1977; 8: 69–73.
9. Duignan N M , Studd J W W , Hughes A O . Characteristics of labour in different racial groups. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1975; 82: 593–601.
10. Arulkumaran S , Gibb D M F , Chau S , Piara Singh , Ratnam S S . Ethnic influences on uterine activity in spontaneous labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1989; 96: 1203–6.
11. World Health Organization Maternal Health and Safe Motherhood Programme . World Health Organization partograph in management of labour. Lancet 1994; 343: 1399–404.
12. NICE Intrapartum Care . Care of Healthy Women and their Babies during Childbirth. Clinical guideline 55. London: RCOG Press, 2007.
13. RCOG Clinical Effectiveness Support Unit . The Use of Electronic Fetal Monitoring. Evidence-based clinical guideline number 8. London: RCOG Press, 2001.
14. Studd J , Clegg D R , Saunders R R , Hughes A O . Identification of high risk labours by labour nomogram. Br Med J 1975; ii: 545–7.
15. Cardozo L D , Gibb D M F , Studd J W W , Vasant R V , Cooper D J . Predictive value of cervimetric labour patterns in primigravidae. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1982; 89: 33–8.
16. Gibb D M F , Cardozo L D , Studd J W W , Magos A L , Cooper D J . Outcome of spontaneous labour in multigravidae. Br J Obstet Gnaecol 1982; 89: 708–11.
17. Arulkumaran S , Koh C H , Ingemarsson I , Ratnam S S . Augmentation of labour. Mode of delivery related to cervimetric progress. Aust NZ J Obstet Gynecol 1987; 27: 304–8.
18. Lopez-Zeno J A , Peaceman A M , Adashek J A , Socol M L . A controlled trial of a program for the active management of labor. N Eng J Med 1992; 326: 450–4.
19. Frigoletto F D , Lieberman E , Lang J M , et al. A clinical trial of active management of labor. N Eng J Med 1995; 333: 745–50.
20. Sadler L C , Davison T , McCowan L M E . A randomised controlled trial and meta-analysis of active management of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2000; 107: 909–15.
21. Pajntar M , Leskosek B , Rudel D , Verdenik I . Contribution of cervical smooth muscle activity to the duration of latent and active phases of labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 2001; 108: 533–8.
22. Gough G W , Randall N J , Genevier E S , Sutherland I A , Steer P J . Head to cervix pressure and their relationship to the outcome of labour. Obstet Gynecol 1990; 75: 613–8.
23. Allman A C J , Genevier E S G , Johnson M R , Steer P J . Head-to-cervix force: an important physiological variable in labour. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1996; 103: 763–8.
24. Fraser W D , Krauss I , Brisson-Carrol G , Thornton J , Breart G . Amniotomy for shortening spontaneous labour. The Cochrane Library 2002; 2.
25. The UK Amniotomy Group . A multicentre randomised trial of amniotomy in spontaneous first labour at term. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 1994; 101: 307–9.
26. Arulkumaran S , Yang M , Ingemarsson I , Piara S , Ratnam S S . Augmentation of labour. Does oxytocin titration to achieve preset active contraction area values produce better obstetric outcome? Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 15: 333–7.