Book contents
- Bears of the World
- Bears of the World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Frontispiece
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Systematics, Ecology, and Behavior
- Part II Species Accounts
- Part III Human–Bear Coexistence
- Chapter 15 Human–Bear Conflicts at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century: Patterns, Determinants, and Mitigation Measures
- Chapter 16 Principles of Human–Bear Conflict Management in Challenging Environments
- Chapter 17 Patterns of Bear Attacks on Humans, Factors Triggering Risky Scenarios, and How to Reduce Them
- Chapter 18 Effects of Human Disturbance on Brown Bear Behavior
- Chapter 19 Bears in Human-Modified Landscapes: The Case Studies of the Cantabrian, Apennine, and Pindos Mountains
- Part IV Conservation and ManagementConservation and Management
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Chapter 16 - Principles of Human–Bear Conflict Management in Challenging Environments
from Part III - Human–Bear Coexistence
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 16 November 2020
Book contents
- Bears of the World
- Bears of the World
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Frontispiece
- Contents
- Contributors
- Foreword
- Acknowledgments
- Introduction
- Part I Systematics, Ecology, and Behavior
- Part II Species Accounts
- Part III Human–Bear Coexistence
- Chapter 15 Human–Bear Conflicts at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century: Patterns, Determinants, and Mitigation Measures
- Chapter 16 Principles of Human–Bear Conflict Management in Challenging Environments
- Chapter 17 Patterns of Bear Attacks on Humans, Factors Triggering Risky Scenarios, and How to Reduce Them
- Chapter 18 Effects of Human Disturbance on Brown Bear Behavior
- Chapter 19 Bears in Human-Modified Landscapes: The Case Studies of the Cantabrian, Apennine, and Pindos Mountains
- Part IV Conservation and ManagementConservation and Management
- Index
- Miscellaneous Endmatter
- Plate Section (PDF Only)
- References
Summary
Human–bear conflicts differ geographically across the range of eight bear species. First, a brief summary of how conflict studies started in international relationships and then entered to the field of wildlife conservation is given. Then, an overall picture of human–bear conflict management is provided and how current conflict management plans can be improved by considering them as logic models is discussed. Finally, 12 key factors for managing human–bear conflict in challenging environments are presented.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Bears of the WorldEcology, Conservation and Management, pp. 227 - 238Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2020
References
Artelle, K. A., Reynolds, J. D., Treves, A., et al. (2018). Hallmarks of science missing from North American wildlife management. Science Advances 4(3): eaao0167.Google Scholar
Balint, P. J., Stewart, R. E., Desai, A. & Walters, L. C. (2011). Wicked environmental problems: Managing uncertainty and conflict. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
Baruch-Mordo, S., Breck, S. W., Wilson, K. R. & Broderick, J. (2011). the carrot or the stick? Evaluation of education and enforcement as management tools for human–wildlife conflicts. PLoS ONE 6(1): e15681.Google Scholar
Brownstein, M. (2019). Implicit bias. Available from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/implicit-bias/ (accessed March 9, 2019).Google Scholar
Busjeet, G. (2013). Planning, monitoring, and evaluation: Methods and tools for poverty and inequality reduction programs. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/16449Google Scholar
Can, Ö. E. & Macdonald, D. W. (2017). To protect everything, please click here: does a revolution in data collection guarantee one in conservation? Animal Conservation, 20(1): 1–2.Google Scholar
Can, Ö. E. & Macdonald, D. W. (2018). Looking under the bonnet of conservation conflicts: can neuroscience help? Biodiversity and Conservation 27(8): 2087–2091.Google Scholar
Can, Ö. E., Lise, Y. & Kandemir, İ. (2007). Bees and bears: a review of beekeeper-bear conflict in Black Sea Region, Turkey and recommendations for conflict resolution. American Bee Journal, July: 630–636.Google Scholar
Can, Ö. E., D’Cruze, N., Garshelis, D. L., Beecham, J. & Macdonald, D. W. (2014). Resolving human–bear conflict: a global survey of countries, experts, and key factors. Conservation Letters 7(6): 501–513.Google Scholar
Chandran, R. (2015, March 9). It’s broke, so fix it: humanitarian response in crisis. Available from https://cpr.unu.edu/its-broke-so-fix-it-humanitarian-response-in-crisis.html (accessed April 5, 2015).Google Scholar
Cohn, J. P. (2002). Environmental conflict resolution. BioScience 52(5): 400–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Editors. (1957). Approaches to the study of social conflict: introduction by the editors. Conflict Resolution 1(2): 105–110.Google Scholar
Elm, E. C. & Diener, M. K. (2007). The language of war in biomedical journals. The Lancet 369: 1.Google Scholar
Federal Aviation Administration. (2000). FAA system safety handbook. Retrieved from www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/risk_management/ss_handbook/Google Scholar
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Medin, D. & Shikaki, K. (2007). Sacred bounds on rational resolution of violent political conflict. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 104(18): 7357–7360.Google Scholar
Gippoliti, S., Brito, D., Cerfolli, F., et al. (2018). Europe as a model for large carnivores conservation: is the glass half empty or half full? Journal for Nature Conservation 41: 73–78.Google Scholar
Gore, M. L., Knuth, B. A., Curtis, P. D. & Shanahan, J. E. (2006). Education programs for reducing American black bear–human conflict: indicators of success? Ursus, 17(1): 75–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gore, M. L., Knuth, B. A., Scherer, C. W. & Curtis, P. D. (2008). Evaluating a conservation investment designed to reduce human–wildlife conflict: evaluating conservation investment. Conservation Letters 1(3): 136–145.Google Scholar
Gretzinger, J., Molak, M., Reiter, E., et al. (2019). Large-scale mitogenomic analysis of the phylogeography of the Late Pleistocene cave bear. Scientific Reports 9(1). doi:10.1038/s41598-019-47073-zGoogle Scholar
Herrero, S., Higgins, A., Cardoza, J. E., Hajduk, L. I. & Smith, T. S. (2011). Fatal attacks by American black bear on people: 1900–2009. The Journal of Wildlife Management 75(3): 596–603.Google Scholar
Hristienko, H. & McDonald, J. E. (2007). Going into the 21st century: a perspective on trends and controversies in the management of the American black bear. Ursus 18(1): 72–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Institute of Medicine. (2009). On being a scientist: A guide to responsible conduct in research, 3rd edition. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
IUCN SSC BSG. (2019). Principles of human–bear conflict reduction. IUCN SSC Bear Specialist Group.Google Scholar
Knowlton, L. W. & Phillips, C. C. (2009). The logic model guidebook: Better strategies for great results. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.Google Scholar
Larson, B. M. (2005). The war of the roses: demilitarizing invasion biology. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 3(9): 495–500.Google Scholar
Marsh, H. (2014). Do no harm: Tales of life, death and brain surgery. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.Google Scholar
Matt, C. (2012). 4th International Human–Bear Conflicts Workshop Summary. Available from www.bearbiology.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/08/4th-human-bear-conflict-workshop-summary.pdfGoogle Scholar
OED. (2015). Conflict. Oxford English Dictionary. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. Retrieved from www.oed.com/view/Entry/38898?result=1&rskey=uilnn5&Google Scholar
O’Sullivan, N. J., Teasdale, M. D., Mattiangeli, V., et al. (2016). A whole mitochondria analysis of the Tyrolean Iceman’s leather provides insights into the animal sources of Copper Age clothing. Scientific Reports 6(1). doi:10.1038/srep31279Google Scholar
Paquet, P. C. & Darimont, C. T. (2010). Wildlife conservation and animal welfare: two sides of the same coin. Animal Welfare 19(2): 177–190.Google Scholar
Paulus, M. P., Potterat, E. G., Taylor, M. K., et al. (2009). A neuroscience approach to optimizing brain resources for human performance in extreme environments. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews 33(7): 1080–1088.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. N., Birckhead, J. L., Leong, K., Peterson, M. J. & Peterson, T. R. (2010). Rearticulating the myth of human–wildlife conflict. Conservation Letters 3(2): 74–82.Google Scholar
Peterson, M. N., Peterson, M. J., Peterson, T. R. & Leong, K. (2013). Why transforming biodiversity conservation conflict is essential and how to begin. Pacific Conservation Biology 19(2): 94.Google Scholar
Peyton, B. (1994). Conservation in the developing world: ideas on how to proceed. Bears: Their Biology and Management 9: 115.Google Scholar
Pooley, S., Barua, M., Beinart, W., et al. (2017). An interdisciplinary review of current and future approaches to improving human–predator relations: improving human–predator relations. Conservation Biology 31(3): 513–523.Google Scholar
Presnall, C. C. (1943). Wildlife conservation as affected by American Indian and Caucasian concepts. Journal of Mammalogy 24(4): 458–464.Google Scholar
Ramsbotham, O., Woodhouse, T. & Miall, H. (2011). Contemporary conflict resolution, 3rd edition. Bristol: Polity.Google Scholar
Ratnayeke, S., Van Manen, F. T., Pieris, R. & Pragash, V. S. J. (2014). Challenges of large carnivore conservation: sloth bear attacks in Sri Lanka. Human Ecology 42: 467–479. doi:10.1007/s10745-014-9643-yGoogle Scholar
Reddy, S. M. W., Montambault, J., Masuda, Y. J., et al. (2017). Advancing conservation by understanding and influencing human behavior: human behavior and nature. Conservation Letters 10(2): 248–256.Google Scholar
Redpath, S. M., Young, J., Evely, A., et al. (2013). Understanding and managing conservation conflicts. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 28(2): 100–109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Redpath, S. M., Bhatia, S. & Young, J. (2015). Tilting at wildlife: reconsidering human–wildlife conflict. Oryx 49(2): 222–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rittel, H. W. J. & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences 4(2): 155–169.Google Scholar
Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations, 4th edition. New York, NY: Free Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Sandermoen, K. (2019). Management consulting (is not) for dummies. Alosen, Switzerland: Sandermoen Publishing.Google Scholar
Shenhav, A. & Greene, J. D. (2014). Integrative moral judgment: dissociating the roles of the amygdala and ventromedial prefrontal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 34(13): 4741–4749.Google Scholar
Spencer, R. D., Beausoleil, R. A. & Martorello, D. A. (2007). How agencies respond to human–black bear conflicts: a survey of wildlife agencies in North America. Ursus 18(2): 217–229.Google Scholar
Swaisgood, R. R. (2007). Current status and future directions of applied behavioral research for animal welfare and conservation. Applied Animal Behaviour Science 102(3–4): 139–162.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 7: 320–324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treves, A. & Bruskotter, J. (2014). Tolerance for predatory wildlife. Science 344(6183): 476–477.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Treves, A., Wallace, R. B., Naughton-Treves, L. & Morales, A. (2006). Co-managing human–wildlife conflicts: a review. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 11(6): 383–396.Google Scholar
UNDP. (2009). Handbook on planning, monitoring and evaluating for development results. New York, NY: United Nations Development Programme.Google Scholar
United Nations. (2004). World population to 2300 (No. ST/ESA/SER.A/236). New York, NY: United Nations.Google Scholar
Wilson, S. M. (2016). A guidebook to human–carnivore conflict: Strategies and tips for effective communication and collaboration with communities. Ljubljana, Slovenia: Slovenia Forest Service – LIFE DINALP BEAR project.Google Scholar
W. K. Kellogg Foundation. (2004). W.K. Kellogg Foundation 2004.pdf. Michigan, USA: W.K. Kellogg Foundation.Google Scholar
WSPA. (2009). Principles of human–bear conflict management. Istanbul: World Society for the Protection of Animals.Google Scholar
Zedrosser, A. (2019). The major challenges facing bears. International Bear News 28(2): 2.Google Scholar