Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-dh8gc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T19:51:15.539Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

9 - Italy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

A. Denny Ellerman
Affiliation:
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Barbara K. Buchner
Affiliation:
Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM)
Carlo Carraro
Affiliation:
Università degli Studi di Venezia
Get access

Summary

Introductory background and context

Throughout its development process the Italian National Allocation Plan (NAP) required by Directive 2003/87/EC (the EU ETS Directive) had to face a complex context. The challenging emission reduction commitments taken up by Italy through the Kyoto Protocol had to be pursued vis-à-vis a number of challenging issues including: rapidly rising greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions trend, contrasting energy policy objectives of supply diversification and smooth market liberalisation, challenging time-frames, lack of data and a climate of political uncertainty over the entry into force of the Kyoto Protocol itself. Furthermore, at both the EU and national level lack of clarity existed over the role of the EU ETS as a ‘policy setting’ rather than a ‘policy compliance’ tool. All of these issues have significantly influenced the NAP development process and their understanding is critical for drawing conclusions over lessons to be learnt.

Italy's reduction target and abatement potential

Italy's GHG emissions reduction target under the Burden Sharing Agreement (BSA) appears relatively modest when compared in absolute terms to targets of other Member States. However, it becomes quite challenging when considering the country's rising emission levels and high abatement costs. Under the BSA Italy has committed to a 6.5% reduction of its 1990 GHG emissions. A commitment requiring in absolute terms a reduction from the 508 Mt CO2e per year emitted in 1990 to an average 476 Mt CO2e per year during the period 2008–2012.

However, a number of factors make such an apparently limited reduction extremely challenging.

Type
Chapter
Information
Allocation in the European Emissions Trading Scheme
Rights, Rents and Fairness
, pp. 213 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×