Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-tn8tq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-26T17:37:18.725Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

1 - On Adaptiveness

Changing Earth System Governance

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 June 2021

By
Riyanti Djalante ,
Bernd Siebenhüner ,
Julie P. King ,
Nicolas W. Jager  and
Louis Lebel
Edited by
Riyanti Djalante  and
Bernd Siebenhüner
Riyanti Djalante
Affiliation:
United Nations University, Tokyo
Bernd Siebenhüner
Affiliation:
Carl V. Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg, Germany
Get access

Summary

The earth system is being transformed by human activities. The complex societal, technological, and environmental changes underway require governance systems that can anticipate, manage, and help steer these changes along more sustainable trajectories. A decade ago the Earth System Governance (ESG) Project proposed that adaptiveness is one of the key attributes and goals of governance in these situations. Adaptiveness is an umbrella concept encompassing and related to adaptive management and governance, adaptive capacity, vulnerability, resilience, robustness, and social learning. As part of the ESG Project Harvesting Initiative, this book aims to take stock and review a decade of research progress surrounding these themes. Its key research question is: How has adaptiveness, as an umbrella concept, been developed and applied in the context of earth system governance in the first decade after its inception, and what insights and practical solutions has it yielded? Here this ambitious question is divided into four specific questions based on the ESG Project 2009 Science Plan: (1) What are the politics of adaptiveness? (2) Which governance processes foster adaptiveness? (3) What attributes of governance systems enhance capacities to adapt? (4) How, when, and why does adaptiveness influence eartth system governance?

Keywords

adaptive managementadaptive governanceadaptive capacityresiliencevulnerabilityadaptation to climate changesocial learningrobustnessearth system governance
Type
Chapter
Information
Adaptiveness: Changing Earth System Governance , pp. 1 - 25
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adger, W.N. (2003). Social aspects of adaptive capacity. In Smith, J.B., Klein, R.J.T., & Huq, S., eds., Climate Change, Adaptive Capacity and Development. London: Imperial College Press, 29–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adger, W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 268–81.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Social Learning Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. (2009). Evolution of co-management: role of knowledge generation, bridging organizations and social learning. Journal of Environmental Management, 90(5), 1692–702.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., Folke, C., & Colding, J. (eds.). (2000). Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Betsill, M.M., Benney, T.M., & Gerlak, A.K. (eds.). (2019). Agency in Earth System Governance. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. (2019). Editorial to the inaugural issue of ‘Earth System Governance’. Earth System Governance, 1, 100001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biermann, F., Betsill, M.M., Gupta, J. et al. (2009). Earth System Governance: People, Places, and the Planet: Science Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Bonn: International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change.Google Scholar
Biermann, F. & Kim, R.E. (eds.). (2020). Architectures of Earth System Governance: Institutional Complexity and Structural Transformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Biesbroek, G.R., Dupuis, J., & Wellstead, A. (2017). Explaining through causal mechanisms: resilience and governance of social-ecological systems. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 28, 64–70.Google Scholar
Birkmann, J. (2006). Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions. In Birkmann, J., ed., Measuring Vulnerability to Natural Hazards: Towards Disaster Resilient Societies. Tokyo and New York: United Nations University Press, 9–54.Google Scholar
Bishop, P., Hines, A., & Collins, T. (2007). The current state of scenario development: an overview of techniques. Foresight, 9(1), 5–25.Google Scholar
Bouwen, R. & Taillieu, T. (2004). Multi‐party collaboration as social learning for interdependence: Developing relational knowing for sustainable natural resource management. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 14(3), 137–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, S., Walker, B., Anderies, J.M., & Abel, N. (2001). From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what? Ecosystems, 4(8), 765–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaffin, B.C., Gosnell, H., & Cosens, B.A. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society, 19(3), 56.Google Scholar
Chang, S.E. & Shinozuka, M. (2004). Measuring improvements in the disaster resilience of communities. Earthquake Spectra, 20(3), 739–55.Google Scholar
Chazdon, R.L. (2008). Beyond deforestation: restoring forests and ecosystem services on degraded lands. Science, 320(5882), 1458–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinner, J.E., Adger, W.N., Allison, E.H. et al. (2018). Building adaptive capacity to climate change in tropical coastal communities. Nature Climate Change, 8, 117–23.Google Scholar
Cook, T.D. (2014). Generalizing causal knowledge in the policy sciences: external validity as a task of both multi-attribute representation and multi-attribute extrapolation. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 33(2), 527–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter, S.L., Barnes, L., Berry, M. et al. (2008). A place-based model for understanding community resilience to natural disasters. Global Environmental Change, 18(4), 598–606.Google Scholar
Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., & Shirley, W.L. (2012). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. In Cutter, S.L., ed., Hazards, Vulnerability and Environmental Justice. London: Routledge, 143–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davoudi, S., Shaw, K., Haider, J. et al. (2012). Resilience: a bridging concept or a dead end? ‘Reframing’ resilience: challenges for planning theory and practice interacting traps: resilience assessment of a pasture management system in Northern Afghanistan urban resilience: what does it mean in planning practice? Resilience as a useful concept for climate change adaptation? The politics of resilience for planning: a cautionary note. Planning Theory & Practice, 13(2), 299–333.Google Scholar
Dietz, T., Ostrom, E., & Stern, P.C. (2003). The struggle to govern the commons. Science, 302(5652), 1907–12.Google Scholar
Djalante, R., Holley, C., Thomalla, F., & Carnegie, M. (2013). Pathways for adaptive and integrated disaster resilience. Natural Hazards, 69(3), 2105–35.Google Scholar
Elmqvist, T., Folke, C., Nyström, M. et al. (2003). Response diversity, ecosystem change, and resilience. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 1(9), 488–94.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance (ESG) Project. (2018). Earth System Governance: Science and Implementation Plan of the Earth System Governance Project. Utrecht: ESG Project.Google Scholar
Earth System Governance (ESG) Project. (2020). Research findings. Retrieved from www.earthsystemgovernance.org/research-findings/.Google Scholar
Folke, C. (2006). Resilience: the emergence of a perspective for social-ecological systems analyses. Global Environmental Change, 16(3), 253–67.Google Scholar
Folke, C., Carpenter, S., Elmqvist, T. et al. (2002). Resilience and sustainable development: building adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. AMBIO: A Journal of the Human Environment, 31(5), 437–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Folke, C., Hahn, T., Olsson, P., & Norberg, J. (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441–73.Google Scholar
Füssel, H.M. (2007). Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Global Environmental Change, 17(2), 155–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, A.L. & Bennett, A. (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Goertz, G. (2017). Multimethod Research, Causal Mechanisms, and Case Studies: An Integrated Approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L.H. & Light, S.S. (2006). Adaptive management and adaptive governance in the Everglades ecosystem. Policy Sciences, 39, 323–34.Google Scholar
Gupta, J., Termeer, C., Klostermann, J. et al. (2010). The adaptive capacity wheel: a method to assess the inherent characteristics of institutions to enable the adaptive capacity of society. Environmental Science & Policy, 13(6), 459–71.Google Scholar
Hinrichsen, D. & Pritchard, A.J. (2011). Mathematical Systems Theory I: Modelling, State Space Analysis, Stability and Robustness (Vol. 48). Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
Hodbod, J. & Eakin, H. (2015). Adapting a social-ecological resilience framework for food systems. Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, 5(3), 474–84.Google Scholar
Holling, C.S. (1973). Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 4(1), 1–23.Google Scholar
Hufschmidt, G. (2011). A comparative analysis of several vulnerability concepts. Natural Hazards, 58(2), 621–43.Google Scholar
Huitema, D., Mostert, E., Egas, W. et al. (2009). Adaptive water governance: assessing the institutional prescriptions of adaptive (co-)management from a governance perspective and defining a research agenda. Ecology and Society, 14(1), 26.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, M.A. & Gupta, J. (2019). An institutional analysis method for identifying policy instruments facilitating the adaptive governance of drought. Environmental Science & Policy, 93, 221–31.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2001). Adaptation to climate change in the context of sustainable development and equity. In McCarthy, J.J., Canziani, O.F., Leary, N.A., Dokken, D.J., & White, K.S., eds., Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Retrieved from https://archive.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg2/pdf/wg2TARchap18.pdf.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2014). Annex II: glossary. In Barros, V.R., Field, C.B., Dokken, D.J. et al., eds., Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part B: Regional Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1757–76.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2018). Global Warming of 1.5°C: An IPCC Special Report on the Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Pre-Industrial Levels and Related Global Greenhouse Gas Emission Pathways, in the Context of Strengthening the Global Response to the Threat of Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019a). Climate Change and Land: An IPCC Special Report on Climate Change, Desertification, Land Degradation, Sustainable Land Management, Food Security, and Greenhouse Gas Fluxes in Terrestrial Ecosystems. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). (2019b). IPCC Special Report on the Ocean and Cryosphere in a Changing Climate. Geneva: IPCC.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). (2019). Summary for Policymakers of the Global Assessment Report on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services of the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Bonn: IPBES Secretariat.Google Scholar
Jensen, J.L. & Rodgers, R. (2001). Cumulating the intellectual gold of case study research. Public Administration Review, 61(2), 235–46.Google Scholar
Kelly, P.M. & Adger, W.N. (2000). Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and Facilitating adaptation. Climatic Change, 47(4), 325–52.Google Scholar
Klau, G.W. & Weiskircher, R. (2005). Robustness and resilience. In Brandes, U. & Erlebach, T., eds., Network Analysis: Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 3418). Berlin: Springer, 417–37.Google Scholar
Kuorikoski, J., Lehtinen, A., & Marchionni, C. (2010). Economic modelling as robustness analysis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 61(3), 541–67.Google Scholar
Kwakkel, J.H. & Pruyt, E. (2013). Exploratory modeling and analysis: an approach for model-based foresight under deep uncertainty. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(3), 419–31.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Anderies, J.L., Campbell, B. et al. (2006). Governance and the capacity to manage resilience in regional social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(11), 19.Google Scholar
Lebel, L., Grothmann, T., & Siebenhüner, B. (2010). The role of social learning in adaptiveness: insights from water management. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 10(4), 333–53.Google Scholar
Levin, S.A. & Lubchenco, J. (2008). Resilience, robustness, and marine ecosystem-based management. Bioscience, 58(1), 27–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lloyd, M.G., Peel, D., & Duck, R.W. (2013). Towards a social-ecological resilience framework for coastal planning. Land Use Policy, 30(1), 925–33.Google Scholar
Lucas, W.A. (1974). The Case Survey Method: Aggregating Case Experience. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.Google Scholar
McGreavy, B., Calhoun, A., Jansujwicz, J., & Levesque, V. (2016). Citizen science and natural resource governance: program design for vernal pool policy innovation. Ecology and Society, 21(2), 48.Google Scholar
Mahoney, J. & Barrenechea, R. (2019). The logic of counterfactual analysis in case‐study explanation. British Journal of Sociology, 70, 306–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mangnus, A.C., Vervoot, J.M., McGreevy, S.R. et al. (2019). New pathways for governing food system transformations: a pluralistic practice-based futures approach using visioning, back-casting, and serious gaming. Ecology and Society, 24(4), 2. doi: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11014-240402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meissner, D. (2012). Results and impact of national foresight studies. Futures, 44(10), 905–13.Google Scholar
Miller, F., Osbhar, H., Boyd, E. et al. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability: complementary or conflicting concepts? Ecology and Society, 15(3), 11.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. (1973). Toward a cognitive social learning reconceptualization of personality. Psychological Review, 80(4), 252.Google Scholar
Newig, J., Jager, N.W., Kochskämper, E., & Challies, E. (2019). Learning in participatory environmental governance – its antecedents and effects: findings from a case survey meta-analysis. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 21(3), 213–27.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Galaz, V., & Boonstra, W. (2014). Sustainability transformations: a resilience perspective. Ecology and Society, 19(4), 1.Google Scholar
Olsson, P., Gunderson, L.H., Carpenter, S.R. et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2007). Transitions towards adaptive management of water facing climate and global change. Water Resources Management, 21(1), 49–62.Google Scholar
Pahl-Wostl, C. (2009). A conceptual framework for analysing adaptive capacity and multi-level learning processes in resource governance regimes. Global Environmental Change, 19(3), 354–65.Google Scholar
Patt, A. & Siebenhüner, B. (2005). Agent-based modeling and adaptation to climate change. DIW-Vierteljahresheft, 74(2), 310–20.Google Scholar
Quist, J. & Vergragt, P. (2006). Past and future of backcasting: the shift to stakeholder participation and a proposal for a methodological framework. Futures, 38(9), 1027–45.Google Scholar
Reed, M.S., Evely, A.S., Cundill, G. et al. (2010). What is social learning?. Ecology and Society, 15(4), r1.Google Scholar
Robinson, J. (2003). Future subjunctive: backcasting as social learning. Futures, 35(8), 839–56.Google Scholar
Ryan, M. (2017). Using cases in political science: reflections on Keith Dowding’s ‘The Philosophy and Methods of Political Science’. Political Studies Review, 15(2), 194–200.Google Scholar
Sanderson, I. (2002). Evaluation, policy learning and evidence‐based policy making. Public Administration, 80(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
Sardar, Z. (2010). The namesake: futures; futures studies; futurology; futuristic; foresight – what’s in a name? Futures, 42(3), 177–84.Google Scholar
Scheuer, S., Haase, D., & Volk, M. (2017). Integrative assessment of climate change for fast-growing urban areas: measurement and recommendations for future research. PloS One, 12(12), e0189451.Google Scholar
Scholz, R.W., Blumer, Y.B., & Brand, F.S. (2012). Risk, vulnerability, robustness, and resilience from a decision-theoretic perspective. Journal of Risk Research, 15(3), 313–30.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. (2008). Learning in international organizations in global environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics, 8(4), 92–116.Google Scholar
Siebenhüner, B. & Arnold, M. (2007). Organizational learning to manage sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 16(5), 339–53.Google Scholar
Smit, B., Burton, I., Klein, R. & Wandel, J. (2000). An anatomy of adaptation to climate change and variability. Climatic Change, 45, 223–21.Google Scholar
Social Learning Group. (2001). Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion, and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sterman, J.D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4), 8–25.Google Scholar
Stokke, O. (2012). Disaggregating International Regimes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Termeer, C.J., Dewulf, A., & van Lieshout, M. (2010). Disentangling scale approaches in governance research: comparing monocentric, multilevel, and adaptive governance. Ecology and Society, 15(4), 29.Google Scholar
Tetlock, P.E. & Belkin, A. (1996). Counterfactual Thought Experiments in World Politics: Logical, Methodological, and Psychological Perspectives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, B.L., Kasperson, R.E., Matsone, P.A. et al. (2003). A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 100(14), 8074–9.Google Scholar
United Nations (UN). (2020). Coronavirus global health emergency. Retrieved from www.un.org/en/coronavirus/.Google Scholar
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). (2019). UNEP Global Environment Outlook (GEO-6): Healthy Planet, Healthy People. Nairobi: UNEP.Google Scholar
van der Heijden, J., Bulkeley, H., & Certomà, C. (eds.) (2019). Urban Climate Politics: Agency and Empowerment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vervoort, J.M., Kok, K., van Lammeren, R., & Veldkamp, T. (2010). Stepping into futures: exploring the potential of interactive media for participatory scenarios on social-ecological systems. Futures, 42(6), 604–16.Google Scholar
Vincent, K. (2007). Uncertainty in adaptive capacity and the importance of scale. Global Environmental Change, 17(1), 12–24.Google Scholar
Walker, B., Holling, C.S., Carpenter, S.R., & Kinzig, A. (2004). Resilience, adaptability and transformability in social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 9(2), 5.Google Scholar
Weible, C.M., Nohrstedt, D., Cairney, P. et al. (2020). COVID-19 and the policy sciences: initial reactions and perspectives. Policy Sciences. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11077-020-09381-4.Google Scholar
Wenger, E. (2010). Communities of practice and social learning systems: the career of a concept. In Blackmore, C., ed., Social Learning Systems and Communities of Practice . London: Springer, 179–98.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). (2020). Coronavirus disease 2019. Retrieved from www.who.int/emergencies/diseases/novel-coronavirus-2019.Google Scholar
Yaro, J.A. (2004). Theorizing food insecurity: building a livelihood vulnerability framework for researching food insecurity. Norwegian Journal of Geography, 58(1), 23–37.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×