Book contents
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Acronyms
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Accountability in the Counter-Terrorist State
- 1 The Counter-Terrorist State
- 2 The Practice and Potential of Counter-Terrorism Review
- 3 The Prevailing Approach to Review
- 4 Problematising Counter-Terrorism Review
- Conclusion: Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Appendix
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 10 March 2021
- Frontmatter
- Contents
- List of Acronyms
- Acknowledgements
- Introduction: Accountability in the Counter-Terrorist State
- 1 The Counter-Terrorist State
- 2 The Practice and Potential of Counter-Terrorism Review
- 3 The Prevailing Approach to Review
- 4 Problematising Counter-Terrorism Review
- Conclusion: Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State
- Appendix
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Interview Questions
Basic Participant Information [background only]
1. Participant Name
2. Participant Job Title
3. How long have you been in this role?
4. What is your professional background?
Participant view of counter-terrorism review
5. What do you think counter-terrorism review is?
6. What do you think is the purpose of counter-terrorism review?
Participant role in relation to counter-terrorism review
7. What role do you have in relation to counter-terrorism review?
8. How do you view this role as relating to other forms of counterterrorism review?
Desired change or role constraints
9. Is there anything you think you should have the power to review that you do not currently have the power to review?
10. Is there anything you do have the power to review that you think you do not really need to review?
Process
11. Can you tell me how you go about doing [reference to described counter-terrorism review role]?
Access to information
12. What information do you need to undertake your counter-terrorism review role?
Constraints, frustrations, strengths of counter-terrorism review currently
13. What are the main challenges/frustrations that you face in the context of your counter-terrorism review work?
14. What would change/meet those challenges?
15. What changes would you like to see to the current approach to counter-terrorism review?
16. What, in your view, are the strengths of the current approach to counter-terrorism review?
Impact
17. What happens on the basis of your recommendations/findings/reports?
18. What affects whether a review will bring about change or not?
Audience
19. When writing your recommendations/findings/reports who do you expect will read it? For whom are you writing?
20. When you read the reports arising from other mechanisms (government, Independent Reviewer of Terrorism Legislation, Select Committees, Courts etc.) who do you think the target audience is?
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Accountability and Review in the Counter-Terrorist State , pp. 167 - 168Publisher: Bristol University PressPrint publication year: 2019