References

Aarts, Bas. 2007. Syntactic gradience: The nature of grammatical indeterminacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aberra, Daniel. 2016. Grammaticalization of the Amharic word fit ‘face’ from a body part to grammatical meanings. Journal of Languages and Culture 7, 9: 86–92.Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner (ed.). 1991a. Discourse particles: Descriptive and theoretical investigations on the logical, syntactic and pragmatic properties of discourse particles in German. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, Werner 1991b. Disourse particles in German: How does their illocutive force come about? In Abraham 1991a, pp. 203–52.CrossRef

Abraham, Werner 1991c. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In Traugott and Heine 1991b, pp. 331–80.CrossRef

Abraham, Werner 1993. Einleitung zum Thema dieses Bandes. Grammatikalisierung und Reanalyse: Einanderausschließende oder ergänzende Begriffe? Folia Linguistica Historica 13, 1–2: 7–26.Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2000. Modal particles in German: Word classification and legacy beyond grammaticalization. In Vogel and Comrie 2000, pp. 321–50.

Abraham, Werner 2003. Autonomous and non-autonomous components of “grammaticalization”: Economic criteria in the emergence of German negation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 56, 4: 325–65.Google Scholar

Abraham, Werner 2004. The grammaticalization of the infinitival preposition: Toward a theory of “grammaticalizing reanalysis”. Journal of Comparative Germanic Linguistics 7, 2: 111–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, Werner, Givón, T., and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.). 1995. Discourse, grammar and typology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Abraham, Werner and Leisiö, Larisa (eds.). 2006. Passivization and typology. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John BenjaminsCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Adams, Karen. 1986. Numeral classifiers in Austroasiatic. In Craig 1986b, pp. 241–62.

Adams Liclan, Patsy and Marlett, Stephen. 1990. Madija noun morphology. International Journal of American Linguistics 56: 102-20.Google Scholar

Adelaar, Alexander and Pawley, Andrew (eds.). 2009. Austronesian historical linguistics and culture history: A festschrift for Robert Blust. Canberra: Pacific Linguistics.Google Scholar

Adone, Dany and Plag, Ingo (eds.). 1994. Creolization and language change. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahlqvist, Anders (ed.). 1982. Papers from the 5th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Ahn, Joo-Hoh. 1996. A study of the phenomena of grammaticization in the Korean noun. PhD dissertation, Yonsei University, Korea.

Ahn, Joo-Hoh 2003. A study on quotation sentence and grammaticalization of quotation markers in Korean. Discourse and Cognition 10, 1: 145–165.Google Scholar

Ahn, Joo-Hoh 2006. Syntactic characteristics of ‘sipta’ phrase and its semantic development in Modern Korean. Korean Semantics 20: 371–91.Google Scholar

Ahn, Kyou Dong. 2005. Semantic generality dilemma in grammaticalization: A case of cappacita. Journal of Linguistic Science 32: 159–78.Google Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung. 2009. Emergence of causality in grammar: Causal complex prepositions in English. Seoul: Hankookmunhwasa.Google Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung 2010. From ‘favor’ to ‘cause’: The English causal adposition thanks to and its Korean counterpart tekpwuney. Language Sciences 32: 579–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung 2016. Surprise in discourse: The mirative meanings of ta(ha)-derived sentence final particles in Korean. Language and Linguistics 71: 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung and Yap, Foong Ha. 2013. Negotiating common ground in discourse: A diachronic and discourse analysis of maliya in Korean. Language Sciences 37: 36–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ahn, Mikyung and Yap, Foong Ha 2015. Evidentiality in interaction: A pragmatic analysis of Korean hearsay evidential markers. Studies in Language 39, 1: 46–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aijmer, Karin. 1985. The semantic development of will. In Fisiak 1985, pp. 11–21.

Aijmer, Karin 1997. I think – an English modal particle. In Swan and Westvik 1997, pp. 1–47.CrossRef

Aijmer, Karin 2002. English discourse particles: Evidence from a corpus. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aijmer, Karin 2004. The semantic path from modality to aspect: be able to in a crosslinguistic perspective. In Lindquist and Mair 2004, pp. 57–78.CrossRef

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1996. Areal diffusion in northwest Amazonia: The case of Tariana. Anthropological Linguistics 38: 73–116.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1997. Areal typology and grammaticalization: The emergence of new verbal morphology in an obsolescent language. Paper presented at the symposium On the Interface between Comparative Linguistics and Grammaticalization Theory: Languages of the Americas, Rice University, Houston, TX, 26–29 March 1997.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 1998. Warekena. In Derbyshire and Pullum 1998, pp. 215–439.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2000. Classifiers: A typology of noun categorization devices. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2002. Language contact in Amazonia. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2003. Mechanisms of change in areal diffusion: New morphology and language contact. Journal of Linguistics 39: 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2004. Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2008. The Manambu language of East Sepik, Papua New Guinea. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2010. Imperatives and commands. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2011. The grammaticalization of evidentiality. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 602–10.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2012. Languages of the Amazon. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2013. Areal diffusion and parallelism in drift: Shared grammaticalization patterns. In Robbeets and Cuyckens 2013, pp. 23–41.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. 2018a. Areal diffusion and the limits of grammaticalization: An Amazonian perspective. In Narrog and Heine 2018, pp. 337–49.

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. (ed.). 2018b. The Oxford handbook of evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, R. M. W. (eds.). 2001. Areal diffusion and genetic inheritance: Problems in comparative linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.). 2003. Studies in evidentiality. (Typological Studies in Language 54.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.). 2006a. Serial verb constructions: A cross-linguistic typology . (Explorations in Linguistic Typology 2.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.). 2006b. Grammars in contact: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.). 2014. The grammar of knowledge: A cross-linguistic typology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aikhenvald, Alexandra Y. and Dixon, Robert M. W. (eds.). 2017. The Cambridge handbook of linguistic typology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aitchison, Jean. 1996. The seeds of speech: Language origin and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Akimoto, Minoji. 2000. The grammaticalization of the verb ʽprayʼ. In Fischer et al. 2000, pp. 67–84.

Akimoto, Minoji (ed.). 2004. Linguistic studies based on corpora. Tokyo: Hituzi Syobo.Google Scholar

Albright, Adam. 2008. Explaining universal tendencies and language particulars in analogical change. In Good 2008, pp. 144–81.

Alexandre, R. P. 1953a. La langue moré, vol. 1: Introduction, grammaire moré, dictionnaire français–moré. Dakar: Institut Fondamental de l’Afrique Noire (IFAN).Google Scholar

Alexandre, R. P. 1953b. La langue moré, vol. 2: Dictionnaire moré–français. Dakar: IFAN.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis and Fanselow, Gisbert. 2001. Laws of diachrony as a source for syntactic generalisations: The case of V to I. GLOW Newsletter 46: 57–8.Google Scholar

Alexiadou, Artemis and Fanselow, Gisbert 2002. On the correlation between morphology and syntax: The case of V-to-I. In Zwart and Abraham 2002, pp. 219–42.CrossRef

Allen, Andrew. 1995. Regrammaticalization and degrammaticalization of the inchoative suffix. In Andersen 1995, pp. 1–8.

Amborn, Hermann, Minker, Gunter, and Sasse, Hans-Jürgen. 1980. Das Dullay. (Kölner Beiträge zur Afrikanistik 6.) Berlin: Reimer.Google Scholar

Ameka, Felix. 1990. The grammatical packaging of experiences in Ewe: A study in the semantics of syntax. Australian Journal of Linguistics 10: 139–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ameka, Felix 2006. Grammars in contact in the Volta Basin (West Africa): On contact-induced grammatical change in Likpe. In Aikhenvald and Dixon 2006b, pp. 114–42.

Ameka, Felix, Dench, Alan, and Evans, Nicholas (eds.). 2006. Catching language: The standing challenge of grammar writing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Amiridze, Nino 2006. Reflexivization strategies in Georgian. PhD dissertation, University of Utrecht.

Andersen, Henning (ed.). 1995. Historical linguistics 1993. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Henning 2001a. Actualization: Linguistic change in progress. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Andersen, Henning 2001b. Actualization and the (uni)directionality. In Andersen 2001a, pp. 225–48.CrossRef

Andersen, Henning 2008. Grammaticalisation in a speaker-oriented theory of change. In Eythórsson 2008, pp. 11–44.CrossRef

Anderson, Gregory. 2006. Auxiliary verb constructions. (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Anderson, John M. 1971. The grammar of case: Towards a localistic theory. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Anderson, Lloyd B. 1975. Grammar-meaning universals and proto-language reconstruction, or Proto-World NOW! Chicago Linguistics Society 11, pp. 15–36.Google Scholar

Anderson, Stephen R. 1980. On the development of morphology from syntax. In Fisiak 1985, pp. 51–69.

Andersson, Peter. 2008. Swedish må and the (de)grammaticalization debate. In Seoane and López-Couso 2008, pp. 15–32.

Angelo, Denise and Schultze-Berndt, Eva. 2016. “Beware bambai – lest it be apprehensive”. In Meakins and O´Shannessy 2016, pp. 255–96.

Ansaldo, Umberto. 1999. Comparative constructions in Sinitic: Areal typology and patterns of grammaticalization. PhD dissertation, Stockholm University.

Ansaldo, Umberto 2010. Surpass comparatives in Sinitic and beyond: Typology and grammaticalization. Linguistics 48, 4: 919–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ansaldo, Umberto, Bisang, Walter, and Szeto, P-Y. 2018. Grammaticalization in isolating languages and the notion of complexity. In Narrog and Heine 2018, pp. 219–34.CrossRef

Ansaldo, Umberto and Lim, Lisa. 2004. Phonetic absence as syntactic prominence: Grammaticalization in isolating tonal languages. In Fischer, Norde, and Perridon 2004, pp. 345–62.

Antonov, Anton. 2013. Grammaticalization of allocutivity markers in Japanese and Korean in a crosslinguistic perspective. In Robbeets and Cuyckens 2013, pp. 317–39.

Anttila, Raimo. [1972] 1989. An introduction to historical and comparative linguistics. 2nd edn. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques. 1986. Genesis and development of the equative copula in Sranan. In Muysken and Smith 1986, pp. 103–27.

Arends, Jacques (ed.). 1995. The early stages of creolization. (Creole Language Library 13.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Arends, Jacques, Muysken, Pieter, and Smith, Norval (eds.). 1995. Pidgins and creoles: An introduction. (Creole Language Library 15.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Arensen, Jon. 1982. Murle grammar. (Occasional Papers in the Study of Sudanese Languages 2.) Juba: College of Education.Google Scholar

Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues. 1991. On diachronic sources and synchronic pattern: An investigation into the origin of linguistic universals. Language 67, 1: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Aristar, Anthony Rodrigues 1999. Typology and the Saussurean dichotomy. In Justus and Polomé 1999, pp. 409–28.

Arkadiev, Peter and Maisak, Timur. 2018. Grammaticalization in the North Caucasian languages. In Narrog and Heine 2018, pp. 116–45.

Arn, M. J. and Wirtjes, H. (eds.). 1985. Historical and editorial studies in Medieval and Early Modern English. For Johan Gerritsen. Groningen: Wolters-Nordhoff.Google Scholar

Aronoff, Mark (ed.). 1992. Morphology now. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.Google Scholar

Arroyo, José Blas, Luis. 2011. From politeness to discourse marking: The process of pragmaticalization of muy bien in vernacular Spanish. Journal of Pragmatics 43: 855–74.Google Scholar

Ashby, William J. 1981. The loss of the negative particle ne in French: A syntactic change in progress. Language 57: 674–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Ashton, E. O. 1959. Swahili grammar (including intonation). 7th impression. London: Longmans.Google Scholar

Askedal, John Ole. 1997. Drohen und versprechen als sog. ‘Modalitätsverben’ in der deutschen Gegenwartssprache. Deutsch als Fremdsprache 34: 12–19.Google Scholar

Askedal, John Ole 2005. Grammatikalisierung und Persistenz im deutschen “Rezipienten Passiv” mit bekommen/kriegen/erhalten. In Leuschner et al. 2005, pp. 211–27.

Askedal, John Ole 2008. Degrammaticalization versus typology: Reflections on a strained relationship. In Eythórsson 2008, pp. 45–77.CrossRef

Auer, Peter. 1996. The pre-front field position in spoken German and its relevance as a grammaticalization position. Pragmatics 6: 295–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auer, Peter and Günthner, Susanne. 2005. Die Entstehung von Diskursmarkern im Deutschen: Ein Fall von Grammatikalisierung? In Leuschner, Mortelmans, and De Groodt 2005, pp. 335–62.

Austin, Peter. 1981. A grammar of Diyari, South Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Austin, Peter 1981. Switch-reference in Australia. Language 57, 2: 309–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Peter (ed.). 1988. Complex sentence constructions in Australian languages. Amsterdam: Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Austin, Peter 1998. ‘Crow is sitting chasing them’: Grammaticalisation and the verb ‘to sit’ in the Mantharta languages, Western Australia. In Siewierska and Song 1998, pp. 19–36.CrossRef

Autenrieth, Tanja. 2002. Heterosemie und Grammatikalisierung bei Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auwera, Johan van der (ed.). 1998. Adverbial constructions in the languages of Europe. (Empirical Approaches to Language Typology/EUROTYP, 20–3.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auwera, Johan van der 1999. Periphrastic ‘do’, typological prolegomena. In Tops, Devriendt, and Geukens 1999, pp. 457–70.

Auwera, Johan van der 2002. More thoughts on degrammaticalization. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 19–29.CrossRef

Auwera, Johan van der 2008. In defense of classical semantic maps. Theoretical Linguistics 34, 1: 39–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Auwera, Johan van der and Plungian, Vladimir A.. 1998. Modality’s semantic map. Linguistic Typology 2, 1: 79–124.Google Scholar

Awoyale, Yiwola. 1986. Reflexivization in Kwa languages. In Dimmendaal 1986, pp. 1–14.

Baar, Tim van. 1997. Phasal polarity. PhD dissertation, University of Amsterdam.

Babel, Anne. 2009. Dizque, evidentiality and stance in Valley Spanish. Language in Society 38: 487–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Backus, Angus. 1996. Two in one: Bilingual speech of Turkish immigrants in the Netherlands. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.Google Scholar

Backus, Ad, Dogruöz, Seza, and Heine, Bernd. 2011. Salient stages in contact-induced grammatical change: Evidence from synchronic vs diachronic contact situations. Language Sciences 33, 5: 738–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Baek, Nak-Chen. 1999. A study on grammaticalization and restructured compound conjunctive ending in Korean. Journal of Dongguk Language and Literature 10–11: 259–82.Google Scholar

Baek, Nak-Chen 2005. Morpho-syntactic properties of the auxiliary verbs in Korean. Journal of Korean Language and Culture 28: 229–48.Google Scholar

Baik, Junghye. 2011. From ‘follow’ to ‘counter-expectation’ concepts: A case of Korean postposition ttala(se). Journal of Linguistic Science 58: 93–110.Google Scholar

Baik, Junghye 2012. On the emergence of diverse functions of as: A grammaticalization perspective. Discourse and Cognition 19, 3: 157–72.Google Scholar

Baik, Junghye 2015. From nominals to epistemic markers: With reference to the Korean defective noun moyang ‘appearance’. Journal of Linguistic Science 74: 109–26.Google Scholar

Baik, Junghye 2016. On the grammatical evolution of Korean displacement verb pelita ʽthrow awayʼ: From a grammaticalization perspective. International Journal of Language and Linguistics 3, 1: 49–56.Google Scholar

Bak, Sung-Yun. 1997. Pakkey: A case of grammaticalization in Korean. Korean Journal of Linguistics 22, 1: 57–70.Google Scholar

Baker, Mark. 1988. Incorporation: A theory of grammatical function changing. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar

Baker, Philip. 1995. Some developmental inferences from the historical studies of pidgins and creoles. In Arends 1995, pp. 1–24.

Baker, Philip and Syea, Anand (eds.). 1996. Changing meanings, changing functions: Papers relating to grammaticalization in contact languages. (Westminster Creolistics Series 2.) London: University of Westminster Press.Google Scholar

Bakker, Peter and Mous, Maarten (eds.). 1994. Mixed languages: 15 case studies in language intertwining. (Studies in Language and Language Use 13.) Amsterdam: Institute for Functional Research into Language and Language Use (IFOTT).Google Scholar

Bamgbose, Ayo. 1966. A grammar of Yoruba. (West African Language Monographs 5.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Bamgbose, Ayo 1974. On serial verbs and verbal status. Journal of West African Languages 9, 1: 17–48.Google Scholar

Bao, Zhiming and Wee, Lionel. 1999. The passive in Singapore English. World Englishes 18: 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barlow, A. Ruffell. 1960. Studies in Kikuyu grammar and idiom. Edinburgh: Blackwood and Sons.Google Scholar

Baron, Irene, Herslund, Michael, and Srensen, Finn (eds.). 2001. Dimensions of possession. (Typological Studies in Language, 47.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barth-Weingarten, Dagmar and Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2002. On the development of final though: A case of grammaticalization? In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 345–61.

Battye, Adrian, and Roberts, Ian (eds.). 1995. Clause structure and language change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Bauer, Brigitte. 1995. The definite article in Indo-European: Emergence of a new category. In Stark et al. 2007, pp. 103–40.

Bauer, Winifred. 1997. The Reed reference grammar of Māori. Australia: Reed.Google Scholar

Bavin, Edith L. 1983. Morphological and syntactic divergence in Lango and Acholi. In Vossen and Bechhaus-Gerst 1983, pp. 147–68.

Bavin, Edith L. 1995. The obligation modality in Western Nilotic languages. In Bybee and Fleischman 1995, pp. 107–34.

Becker, Alton L. 1975. A linguistic image of nature: The Burmese numerative classifier system. Linguistics 165: 109–21.Google Scholar

Becker-Donner, Etta. 1965. Die Sprache der Mano. (Österreichische Akademie der Wissenschaften. Phil.-Hist. Klasse. Sitzungsberichte 245, 5.) Graz, Vienna, and Cologne: Hermann Böhlaus Nachfolger.Google Scholar

Beeching, Kate. 2002. Gender, politeness and pragmatic particles in French. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beijering, Karin. 2012. Expressions of epistemic modality in Mainland Scandinavian: A study into the lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface. PhD dissertation, University of Groningen.Google Scholar

Beijering, Karin 2017a. Grammaticalization and (inter)subjectification: The case of the Swedish modals må and måtte. In Van Olmen et al. 2017, pp. 47–80.CrossRef

Beijering, Karin 2017b. The lexicalization-grammaticalization-pragmaticalization interface: The case of Mainland Scandinavian jeg tror. In Smith et al. 2017, pp. 67–91.CrossRef

Bencini, Giulia. 2003. Toward a diachronic typology of yes/no question constructions with particles. In Kaiser et al. 2003, pp. 604–21.

Bender, M. Lionel (ed.). 1976. The non-Semitic languages of Ethiopia. East Lansing, MI: African Studies Center, Michigan State University.Google Scholar

Benson, T. G. 1964. Kikuyu-English dictionary. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar

Bentley, Delia and Ledgeway, Adam (eds.). 2007. Si dialetti italoromanzi: Saggi in onore di Nigel B. Vincent. Norfolk: Biddles.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile. 1966. Problèmes de linguistique générale. Paris: Editions Gallimard.Google Scholar

Benveniste, Emile 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. In Lehmann and Malkiel 1968, pp. 83–94.

Bereczki, Andras, Csepregi, Márta, and Klima, Laszlo (eds.). 2008. Unnepi irasok Havas Ferenc tiszteletere. (Urálisztikai Tanulmányok 18.) Budapest: ELTE Finnugor Tanszék.Google Scholar

Linda van, Bergen and Hogg, Richard M. (eds.). 1997. Papers from the 12th International Conference on Historical Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bergs, Alexander and Diewald, Gabriele (eds.). 2008. Constructions and language change. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bernander, Rasmus. 2017. Grammar and grammaticalization in Manda: An analysis of the wider TAM domain in a Tanzanian Bantu language. PhD dissertation, University of Gothenburg.

Besnier, Niko. 2000. Tuvaluan: A Polynesian language of the Central Pacific. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Beths, Frank. 1999. The history of dare and the status of unidirectionality. Linguistics 37, 6: 1069–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beyer, Klaus. 2017. Grammaticalization as it happens? A usage-based approach to morphosyntactic variation in Pana. In Kramer and Kießling 2017, pp. 27–44.

Bhat, Darbhe N. S. 1999. The prominence of tense, aspect and mood. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bhat, Darbhe N. S. 2013. Third person pronouns and demonstratives. In Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin 2013. The World Atlas of Language Structures Online. http://wals.info/chapter/43

Bickerton, Derek. 1981. Roots of language. Ann Arbor, MI: Karoma.Google Scholar

Binnick, Robert I. 1976. How aspect languages get tense. In Steever, Walker, and Mufwene 1976, pp. 40–9.

Binnick, Robert I. (ed.) 2012. The Oxford handbook of tense and aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bird, Charles S. and Kendall, Martha B.. 1986. Postpositions and auxiliaries in Northern Mande: Syntactic indeterminacy and linguistic analysis. Anthropological Linguistics 28, 4: 389–403.Google Scholar

Bíró, Bernadett. 2017. From nouns into nominalizers and even further – Grammaticalization processes in Northern Mansi. Finnisch-Ugrische Mitteilungen (FUM ) 41: 1–23.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter. 1996. Areal typology and grammaticalization: Processes of grammaticalization based on nouns and verbs in East and Mainland South East Asian languages. Studies in Language 20, 3: 519–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisang, Walter 1998a. Grammaticalization and language contact, constructions and positions. In Ramat, Giacalone and Hopper 1998, pp. 13–58.CrossRef

Bisang, Walter 1998b. Adverbiality: The view from the Far East. In van der Auwera 1998, pp. 643–812.

Bisang, Walter 1999. Classifiers in East and Southeast Asian languages. Counting and beyond. In Grozdanovič 1999, pp. 113–85.

Bisang, Walter 2004. Grammaticalization without coevolution of form and meaning as an areal phenomenon in East and mainland Southeast Asia – the case of tense-aspect-mood (TAM). In Bisang, Himmelmann, and Wiemer 2004, pp. 109–38.

Bisang, Walter 2008. Grammaticalization and the areal factor: The perspective of East and mainland Southeast Asian languages. In López-Couso and Seoane 2008, pp. 15–35.CrossRef

Bisang, Walter 2009. On the evolution of complexity: Sometimes less is more in East and mainland Southeast Asia. In Sampson et al. 2009, pp. 34–49.

Bisang, Walter 2010. Grammaticalization in Chinese. A construction-based account. In Traugott and Trousdale 2010, pp. 245–77.CrossRef

Bisang, Walter 2011. Grammaticalization and typology. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 105–17.CrossRef

Bisang, Walter, Himmelmann, Nikolaus, and Wiemer, Björn (eds.). 2004. What makes grammaticalization? A look from its fringes and its components. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bisang, Walter and Malchukov, Andrej (eds.). 2017. Unity and diversity in grammaticalization scenarios. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 99.) Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar

Bisang, Walter and Malchukov, Andrej. In prep. Cross-linguistic variation in grammaticalization scenarios and areal patterns in grammaticalization: A comparative handbook. (Comparative Handbooks of Linguistics 4.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.

Bisang, Walter and Rinderknecht, Peter (eds.). 1991. Von Europa bis Ozeanien – von der Antonymie zum Relativsatz. (Arbeiten des Seminars für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft der Universität Zürich 11.) Zürich: Universität Zürich.Google Scholar

Bischoff, Shannon and Jany, Carmen (eds.). 2013. Functional approaches to language. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blackings, Mairi and Fabb, Nigel. 2003. A grammar of Ma’di. (Mouton Grammar Library 32.) Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Barry J. 1994. Case. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google ScholarPubMed

Blake, Barry J. 2001. Case. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Blake, Barry, Burridge, Kate, and Taylor, John (eds.). 2003. Historical linguistics 2001. Selected papers from the 15th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Melbourne, 13–17 August 2001. (Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science. Series IV: Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 237.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blake, Frank R. 1934. The origin of pronouns of the first and second persons. American Journal of Philology 55: 244–8.Google Scholar

Blank, Andreas. 2001. Pathways of lexicalizaion. In Haspelmath et al. 2001, pp. 1596–1608.

Blansitt, Edward L. Jr. 1975. Progressive aspect. Working Papers on Language Universals (Stanford, CA) 18: 1–34.Google Scholar

Blansitt, Edward L. 1988. Datives and allatives. In Hammond, Moravcsik, and Wirth 1988, pp. 173–91.

Bleek, Dorothea F. 1956. A Bushman dictionary. (American Oriental Series 41.) New Haven, CT: American Oriental Society.Google Scholar

Blass, Regina. 1989. Grammaticalization of interpretive use: The case of ré in Sissala. Lingua 79: 299–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In Good 2008, pp. 79–107.

Boas, Franz (ed.). 1922. Handbook of American Indian languages, vol. 2. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar

Bogaert, Julie van. 2011. I think and other complement-taking mental predicates: A case of and for constructional grammaticalization. Linguistics 49, 2: 295–332.Google Scholar

Bolden, Galina B. 2009. Implementing incipient actions: The discourse marker ‘so’ in English conversation. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 974–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Boogaart, Ronny. 2009. Een retorische straks-constructie. In Boogaart, Lalleman, Mooijaart, and van der Wal 2009, pp. 167–83.

Boogaart, Ronny Lalleman, Josien, Mooijaart, Marijke, and van der Wal, Marijke (eds.). 2009. Woorden wisselen: Voor Ariane van Santen bij haar afscheid van de Leidse universiteit. Leiden: Stichting Neerlandistiek Leiden (SNL-reeks 20).Google Scholar

Booij, Geert. 2005. Compounding and derivation: Evidence for construction morphology. In Dressler et al. 2005, pp. 109–32.

Booij, Geert, Lehmann, Christian, Mugdan, Joachim, and Skopeteas, Stavros (eds.). 2004. Morphologie – Morphology: Ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbildung, vol. 2 (Handbücher zur Sprach- und Kommunikationswissenschaft 17, 2.) Berlin and New York: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Booij, Geert and van Marle, Jaap (eds.). 1994. Yearbook of morphology. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert. 1983. Kreolsprachen, Substrate und Sprachwandel. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert 1988. Zur grammatischen Struktur des Nubi (Beziehungen zum Arabischen und zu möglichen Substraten). In Boretzky, Enninger, and Stolz 1988, pp. 45–88.

Boretzky, Norbert 1989. Zum Interferenzverhalten des Romani. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung 42, 3: 357–74.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert 1996. Entlehnte Wortstellungssyntax im Romani. In Boretzky et al. 1996, pp. 95–119.

Boretzky, Norbert, Enninger, Werner, and Stolz, Thomas (eds.). 1985. Akten des 1. Essener Kolloquiums über Kreolsprachen und Sprachkontakte. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, Enninger, Werner, and Stolz, Thomas (eds.). 1989. Beiträge zum 4. Essener Kolloquium über “Sprachkontakt, Sprachwandel, Sprachwechsel, Sprachtod” vom 9.10. – 10. 10.1987 an der Universität Essen. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, Enninger, Werner, and Stolz, Thomas (eds.). 1991. Beiträge zum 6. Essener Kolloquium über “Kontakt und Simplifikation” vom 18. – 19. 11.1989 an der Universität Essen. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, Enninger, Werner, and Stolz, Thomas (eds.). 1996. Areale, Kontakte, Dialekte, Sprachen und ihre Dynamik in mehrsprachigen Situationen. (Bochum-Essener Beiträge zur Sprachwandelforschung 24.) Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Boretzky, Norbert, Enninger, Werner, Jeßing, Benedikt, and Stolz, Thomas (eds.). 1993. Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien: Beiträge zum 8. Bochum-Essener Kolloquium über “Sprachwandel und seine Prinzipien”, vom 19.10. – 21. 10.1990 an der Ruhruniversität Bochum. Bochum: Brockmeyer.Google Scholar

Borg, Albert and Plank, Frans (eds.). 1996. The Maltese noun phrase meets typology. Rivista di Linguistica, special issue, 8, 1.Google Scholar

Borgman, Donald. 1990. Sanuma. In Derbyshire and Pullum 1990, pp. 15–248.

Börjars, Kersti. 2003. Morphological status and (de)grammaticalisation: The Swedish possessive. Nordic Journal of Linguistics 26, 2: 133–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Börjars, Kersti and Vincent, Nigel. 2011. Grammaticalization and directionality. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 163–76.

Bossong, Georg. 1985. Zur Entwicklungsdynamik von Kasussystemen. Folia Linguistica Historica 6, 2: 285–321.Google Scholar

Botha, Rudie and de Swart, Henriette (eds.). 2009. Language evolution: The view from restricted linguistic systems. Utrecht: LOT (Netherlands Graduate School of Linguistics).Google Scholar

Botne, Robert. 1989. Reconstruction of a grammaticalized auxiliary in Bantu. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences 19, 2: 169–86.Google Scholar

Botne, Robert 1995. The pronominal origin of an evidential. Diachronica 12: 201–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bouquiaux, Luc (ed.). 1980. L’expansion bantoue, vol. 2. Paris: Société d’Études Linguistiques et Anthropologiques de France (SELAF).Google Scholar

Bourdin, Philippe. 1999. The grammaticalization of deictic directionals as modulators of temporal distance. Paper presented at the international conference on New Reflections on Grammaticalization, Potsdam, Germany, June 1999.

Bourdin, Philippe 2002. The grammaticalization of deictic directionals into modulators of temporal distance. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 181–99.CrossRef

Bourdin, Philippe 2008. On the grammaticalization of ‘come’ and ‘go’ into markers of textual connectivity. In López-Couso and Seoane 2008, pp. 37–56.CrossRef

Bourdin, Philippe 2014. When come and go go necessive. In Devos, Maud, and Jenneke van der Waal 2014, pp. 103–64.

Bowden, John. 1992. Behind the preposition: Grammaticalization of locatives in Oceanic languages. (Pacific Linguistics Series B, 107.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Bowden, John. 2001. Taba: Description of a South Halmahera language. (Pacific Linguistics 521.) Canberra: Australian National University.

Boye, Kasper. 2009. Evidentiality: Linguistic categories and grammaticalization. Functions of Language 16: 9–43.Google Scholar

Boye, Kasper and Harder, Peter. 2012. A usage-based theory of grammatical status and grammaticalization. Language 88, 1: 1–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Henry, Bradley C. and Hollenbach, Barbara E. (eds.). 1988. Studies in the syntax of Mixtecan languages, vol. 1. (Summer Institute of Linguistics Publications in Linguistics 83.) Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas, Arlington.Google Scholar

Brauner, Siegmund. 1974. Lehrbuch des Bambara. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar

Brauner, Siegmund 1993. Innovationsprozesse im Verbalsystem des Schona. In Möhlig, Brauner, and Jungraithmayr 1993, pp. 105–14.

Bravo, Ana 2014. The Spanish auxiliary ir ʽto goʼ: From resultative motion verb to focus marker. In Devos and van der Wal 2014, pp. 187–218.

Breban, Tine. 2008. Grammaticalization, subjectification, and leftward movement of adjectives of difference in the noun phrase. Folia Linguistica 42: 259–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breban, Tine 2010. Reconstructing paths of secondary grammaticalization of same from emphasizing to phoric and nominal-aspectual postdeterminer uses. Transactions of the Philological Society 108, 1: 68–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breban, Tine 2014. What is secondary grammaticalization? Trying to see the wood for the trees in a confusion of interpretations. Folia Linguistica 48, 2: 469–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Breen, J. Gavan. 1976. Wagaya. In Dixon 1976, pp. 590–7.

Breeze, Mary J. 1990. A sketch of the phonology and grammar of Gimira (Benchnon). In Hayward 1990, pp. 1–67.

Brems, Lieselotte. 2007. The grammaticalization of Small Size Nouns: reconsidering frequency and analogy. Journal of English Linguistics 35, 4: 293–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brems, Lieselotte 2010. Size noun constructions as collocationally constrained constructions: Lexical and grammaticalized uses. English Language and Linguistics 14, 1: 83–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brenzinger, Matthias and König, Christa (eds.). 2010. Khoisan languages and linguistics: The Riezlern Symposium 2003. 2004. (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 17.) Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Brenzinger, Matthias and Kraska-Szlenk, Iwona (eds.). 2015. The body in language: Comparative studies of linguistic embodiment. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar

Breu, Walter. 1996. Überlegungen zu einer Klassifizierung des grammatischen Wandels im Sprachkontakt (am Beispiel slavischer Kontaktfälle). Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 49, 1: 21–38.Google Scholar

Breu, Walter 2003. Der indefinite Artikel in slavischen Mikrosprachen: Grammatikalisierung im totalen Sprachkontakt. In Kuße 2003, pp. 27–68.

Breu, Walter 2004. Der definite Artikel in der obersorbischen Umgangssprache. In Krause and Sappok 2004, pp. 9–57.

Breu, Walter 2012. The grammaticalization of an indefinite article in Slavic micro-languages. In Wiemer et al. 2012, pp. 275–322.

Bright, William. 1957. The Karok language. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Bright, William 1992 (ed.). International encyclopedia of linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 1988. The development of English aspectual systems. Aspectualizers and post-verbal particles. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics, 49.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2001. From matrix clause to pragmatic marker: The history of look-forms. Journal of Historical Pragmatics 2: 177–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2002. Grammaticalization versus lexicalization reconsidered: On the “late” use of temporal adverbs. In Fanego et al. 2002, pp. 67–97.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2004. Subject clitics in English: A case of degrammaticalization. In Lindquist and Mair 2004, pp. 227–56.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2008a. The comment clause in English: Syntactic origins and pragmatic development. (Studies in English Language.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brinton, Laurel J. 2008b. “Where grammar and lexis meet”: Composite predicates in English. In Seoane and López-Couso 2008, pp. 33–54.

Brinton, Laurel J. 2011. The grammaticalization of complex predicates. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 556–66.

Brinton, Laurel J. and Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. 2005. Lexicalization and language change. (Research Surveys in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brisson, Robert. 1984. Lexique français-baka. MS, Douala, Cameroon.

Brisson, Robert and Boursier, Daniel. 1979. Petit-dictionnaire baka-français. MS, Douala, Cameroon.

Brown, Lea and Dryer, Matthew. 2008. The verb for ‘and’ in Walman, a Torricelli language of Papua New Guinea. Language 84, 3: 528–65.Google Scholar

Brucale, Luisa and Mocciaro, Egle. 2017. Paths of grammaticalization of the Early Latin per/per-: A cognitive hypothesis. In Van Olmen et al. 2017, pp. 199–235.

Bruce, Les. 1984. The Alamblak language of Papua New Guinea (East Sepik). (Pacific Linguistics, Series C, 81.) Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar

Brugman, Claudia and Macaulay, Monica. 1986. Interacting semantic systems: Mixtec expressions of location. Berkeley Linguistics Society 12: 315–27.Google Scholar

Bruyn, Adrienne. 1995a. Relative clauses in early Sranan. In Arends 1995, pp. 149–202.

Bruyn, Adrienne 1995b. Noun phrases. In Arends et al. 1995, pp. 259–69.CrossRef

Bruyn, Adrienne 1996. On identifying instances of grammaticalization in Creole languages. In Baker and Syea 1996, pp. 29–46.

Bruyn, Adrienne 2009. Grammaticalization in creoles: Ordinary and not-so-ordinary cases. Studies in Language 33, 2: 312–27.Google Scholar

Buchholz, Oda and Fiedler, Wilfried. 1987. Albanische Grammatik. Leipzig: Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar

Buchholz, Oda, Fiedler, Wilfried, and Uhlisch, Gerda. 1993. Wörterbuch Albanisch – Deutsch. Berlin and Munich: Langenscheidt Verlag Enzyklopädie.Google Scholar

Burridge, Kate. 1995. From modal auxiliary to lexical verb: The curious case of Pennsylvania German wotte. In Hogg and van Bergen 1995, pp. 19–33.

Butterworth, Brian, Comrie, Bernard, and Dahl, Östen. 1984. Explanations for language universals. Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985a. Morphology: A study of the relation between meaning and form. (Typological Studies in Language 9.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 1985b. On the nature of grammatical categories. Paper presented at the Second Eastern States Conference on Linguistics, Buffalo, NY, 3 October 1985.

Bybee, Joan L. 1988. Semantic substance vs contrast in the development of grammatical meaning. Berkeley Linguistics Society 14: 247–64.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2003a. Cognitive processes in grammaticalization. In Tomasello 2003, pp. 145–67.

Bybee, Joan L. 2003b. Mechanisms of change in grammaticization: The role of frequency. In Joseph and Janda 2003, pp. 602–23.

Bybee, Joan L. 2006. From usage to grammar: The mind’s response to repetition. Language 82, 4: 711–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. 2008. Grammaticization: Implications for a theory of language. In Guo et al. 2008, 345–56.

Bybee, Joan L. 2009. Language universals and usage-based theory. In Christiansen et al. 2009, pp. 17–39.

Bybee, Joan L. 2011. Usage-based theory and grammaticalization. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 69–78.

Bybee, Joan L. and Beckner, Clay. 2010. Usage-based theory. In Heine and Narrog 2010, pp. 827–56.

Bybee, Joan L. and Dahl, Östen. 1989. The creation of tense and aspect systems in the languages of the world. Studies in Language 13, 1: 51–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Fleischman, Suzanne (eds.). 1995. Modality in grammar and discourse. (Typological Studies in Language 32.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L., Haiman, John, and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.). 1997. Essays on language function and language type: Dedicated to T. Givón. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Hopper, Paul J. (eds.). 2001. Frequency and the emergence of linguistic structure. (Typological Studies in Language 45.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Noonan, Michael (eds.). 2001. Complex sentences in grammar and discourse: Studies presented to Sandra Thompson. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Pagliuca, William. 1985. Cross linguistic comparison and the development of grammatical meaning. In Fisiak 1985, pp. 59–83.

Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William, and Perkins, Revere D.. 1990. On the asymmetries in the affixation of grammatical material. In Croft et al. 1990, pp. 1–42.

Bybee, Joan L., Pagliuca, William, and Perkins, Revere D. 1991. Back to the future. In Traugott and Heine 1991b, pp. 17–58.CrossRef

Bybee, Joan L., Perkins, Revere D., and Pagliuca, William. 1994. The evolution of grammar: Tense, aspect and modality in the languages of the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Thompson, Sandra. 1997. Three frequency effects in syntax. Berkeley Linguistics Society 23: 378–88.Google Scholar

Bybee, Joan L. and Torres Cacoullos, Rena. 2009. The role of prefabs in grammaticization: How the particular and the general interact in language change. In Corrigan et al. 2009, pp. 187–217.

Bybee, Joan L. and Cacoullos, Rena Torres 2015. Grammaticalization and variation of will and shall in Shakespeare’s comedies. In Torres Cacoullos et al. 2015, pp. 131–46.

Byrd, Steven Eric. 2006. Calunga, an Afro-Brazilian speech of the Triangulo Mineiro. Ann Arbor, MI: UMI Services.Google Scholar

Byrne, Francis X. 1988. Deixis as a noncomplementizer strategy for creole subordination marking. Linguistics 26, 3: 335–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Byrne, Francis X. and Holm, John A. (eds.). 1993. Atlantic meets Pacific: A global view of pidginization and creolization. (Creole Language Library 11.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Byrne, Francis X. and Winford, Donald (eds.). 1993. Focus and grammatical relations in Creole languages. (Creole Language Library 12.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Calame-Griaule, Geneviève. 1968. Dictionnaire dogon (dialect toro): Langue et civil-isation. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle. 1985. The Pipil language of El Salvador. (Mouton Grammar Library 1.) Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Lyle 1987. Syntactic change in Pipil. International Journal of American Linguistics 53, 3: 253–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Lyle 1991. Some grammaticalization changes in Estonian and their implications. In Traugott and Heine 1991a, pp. 285–99.CrossRef

Campbell, Lyle 1997. Approaches to reanalysis and its role in the explanation of syntactic change. In van Bergen and Hogg 1997.

Campbell, Lyle 2001. What’s wrong with grammaticalization? Language Sciences 23, 2–3: 113–61.Google Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Janda, Richard. 2001. Introduction: Conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. Language Sciences 23, 2–3: 93–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Campbell, Lyle and Mixco, Mauricio J.. 2007. A glossary of historical linguistics. Salt Lake City: University of Utah Press.Google Scholar

Canon, Rev. and Gore, Edward C.. 1926. Zande grammar. London: Sheldon Press.Google Scholar

Canon, Rev. and Gore, Edward C. [1931] 1952. Zande and English dictionary. Revised edn. London: Sheldon Press.Google Scholar

Canu, Gaston. 1976. La langue mò:ré, dialecte de Ouagadougou (Haute-Volta): Déscription synchronique. Paris: SELAF.Google Scholar

Cao, Guangshun, Chappell, Hilary, Djamouri, R., and Wiebusch, Thekla (eds.). 2013. Breaking down the barriers: Interdisciplinary studies in Chinese linguistics and beyond. 2 vols. Taipei: Academia Sinitica.Google Scholar

Carden, Guy. 1993. The Mauritian Creole ‘lekor’ reflexive: Substrate influence on the target-location parameter. In Byrne and Holm 1993, pp. 105–17.

Carden, Guy and Stewart, William A.. 1988. Binding theory, bioprogram, and creolization: Evidence from Haitian Creole. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 3: 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carden, Guy and Stewart, William A. 1989. Mauritian Creole reflexives: A reply to Corne. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4, 1: 65–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlier, Anne. 2007. From preposition to article: The grammaticalization of the French partitive. Studies in Language 31: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlier, Anne and Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2014. The grammaticalization of the prepositional partitive in Romance. In Luraghi and Huumo 2014, pp. 477–522.

Carlier, Anne and De Mulder, Walter. 2010. The emergence of the definite article in Late Latin ille in competition with ipse. In Cuyckens et al. 2010, pp. 241–76.

Carlier, Anne, De Mulder, Walter, and Lamiroy, Béatrice. 2012. Introduction: The pace of grammaticalization in a typological perspective. Folia Linguistica 46, 2: 287–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlin, Eithne. 1993. The So language. (Afrikanistische Monographien 2.) Cologne: Institut für Afrikanistik, Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar

Carlson, Robert. 1991. Grammaticalization of postpositions and word order in Senufo languages. In Traugott and Heine 1991b, pp. 201–23.

Carlson, Robert 1994. A grammar of Supyire. (Mouton Grammar Library 14.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Carlson, Robert 2014. The grammaticalization of ʽgoʼ as an intensifier in Supyire. In Devos and van der Wal 2014, pp. 249–80.

Carrasquel, José. 1995. The evolution of demonstrative ille from Latin to Modern Spanish: A grammaticalization analysis. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, Seattle.

Casad, Eugene H. 1984. Cora. In Langacker 1984, pp. 151–459.

Casad, Eugene H. and Palmer, Gary B.. 2003. Cognitive linguistics and non-Indo-European languages. Berlin, New York: Mouton de GruyterCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cennamo, Michela. 2005. Passive auxiliaries in Late Latin. In Kiss and Salvi 2005, pp. 179–96.

Cennamo, Michela 2006. The rise and grammaticalization paths in Latin fieri and facere as passive auxiliaries. In Abraham and Leisiö 2006, pp. 311–36.CrossRef

Cennamo, Michela 2007. Auxiliaries and serials between late Latin and early Romance. In Bentley and Ledgeway 2007, pp. 63–87.

Cennamo, Michela 2015. Paths of grammaticalization in Romance voice systems. Paper presented at the symposium on “Areal Patterns of Grammaticalization and Crosslinguistic Variation in Grammaticalization Scenarios”, Mainz, 12–14 March 2015.

Chafe, Wallace L. 1977. The evolution of third person verb agreement in the Iroquoian languages. In Li 1977, pp. 493–524.

Chafe, Wallace L. 2000. Florescence as a force in grammaticalization. In Gildea 2000, pp. 39–64.

Chafe, Wallace L. 2002. Putting grammaticalization in its place. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 395–412.

Chafe, Wallace L. and Nichols, Johanna (eds.). 1986. Evidentiality: The linguistic coding of epistemology. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar

Chaker, Salem. 1997. Quelques faits de grammaticalisation dans le système verbal berbère. In Lemaréchal 1997, pp. 103–21.

Chang, Roland Chiang-Jen. 1977. Co-verbs in spoken Chinese. Taipei: Cheng Chung Book Company.Google Scholar

Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Chapin, Paul G. 1978. Easter Island: A characteristic VSO language. In Lehmann 1978, pp. 139–68.

Chappell, Hilary M. 1986. Formal and colloquial adversity passives in standard Chinese. Linguistics 24, 6: 1025–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. (ed.). 2001a. Sinitic grammar: Synchronic and diachronic perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. 2001b. Synchrony and diachrony of Sinitic languages: A brief history of Chinese dialects. In Chappell 2001a, pp. 3–28.

Chappell, Hilary M. 2001c. A typology of evidential markers in Sinitic languages. In Chappell 2001a, pp. 56–84.

Chappell, Hilary M. 2001d. Dialect grammar in two early modern Southern Min texts: A comparative study of dative kit, comitative cang, and diminutive -guia. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 28,2: 247–302.Google Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. 2006. From Eurocentrism to Sinocentrism: the case of disposal constructions in Sinitic languages. In Ameka, Dench, and Evans, pp. 441–86.

Chappell, Hilary M. 2008. Variation in the grammaticalization of complementizers from verba dicendi in Sinitic languages. Linguistic Typology 12: 45–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. 2013. Pan-Sinitic object markers: morphology and syntax. In Cao et al. 2013, pp. 785–816.

Chappell, Hilary M. (ed.). 2015a. Diversity in Sinitic languages. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. 2015b. Introduction: Ways of tackling diversity in Sinitic languages. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 1–12.

Chappell, Hilary M. 2105c. Linguistic areas in China for differential object marking, passive, comparative constructions. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 13–52.

Chappell, Hilary M. 2017. From verb of saying to discourse marker in Southern Min: (Inter)subjectification and grammaticalization. In Van Olmen et al. 2017, pp. 139–65.

Chappell, Hilary M. and McGregor, William (eds.). 1996. The grammar of inalienability: A typological perspective on body part terms and the part–whole relation. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M., Ming, Li, and Peyraube, Alain. 2007. Chinese linguistics and typology: The state of the art. Linguistic Typology 11, 1: 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chappell, Hilary M. and Peyraube, Alain. 2011. Grammaticalization in Sinitic languages. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 784–94.

Chappell, Hilary M. and Peyraube, Alain 2015. The comparative construction in Sinitic languages: Synchronic and diachronic variation. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 134–54.CrossRef

Chen, Cheng-Fu. 2005. Object voice and nominalization in Rukai. UCLA Working Papers in Linguistics 12: 35–47.Google Scholar

Chen, Weirong. 2015. Comparative constructions of inequality in the Southern Min dialect of Huiʼan. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 248–72.

Chen, Weirong Forthcoming. A grammar of Southern Min: The Hui’an dialect. (Sinitic languages of China: Typological descriptions.) Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.

Chen, Yujie. 2015. The semantic differentiation of demonstratives in Sinitic languages. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 81–109.

Chen, Zhangtai and Xingjian, Li. 1996. Putonghua Jichu Fangyan Jiben Cihuiji (Anthology of the basic vocabulary of the main varieties of Mandarin.) Beijing: Yuwen Chubanshe.Google Scholar

Childs, G. Tucker. 1995. A grammar of Kisi, a Southern Atlantic language. (Mouton Grammar Library 16.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chirikba, Viacheslav. 2003. Evidential category and evidential strategy in Abkhaz. In Aikhenvald and Dixon 2003, pp. 243–72.

Chisholm, William S. Jr., T. Milic, Louis, and Greppin, John A. C. (eds.). 1984. Interrogativity. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Christaller, Johann G. [1875] 1964. A grammar of the Asante and Fante language called Tshi. Basel. Reprinted: Ridgewood, NJ: Gregg Press.Google Scholar

Choi-Jonin, Injoo, Duval, Marc, and Soutet, Olivier (eds.). 2010. Typologie et Comparatisme: Hommages offerts à Alain Lemaréchal. (Supplementa 28.) Leuven and Paris: Peeters, Orbis.Google Scholar

Christiansen, Morten H. et al. (eds.). 2009. Language universals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Chung, Jae-Young. 1993. A study on the grammaticalization of dA syntagma in Middle Korean. PhD dissertation, Hankuk University of Foreign Studies, Korea.

Chung, Jae-Young 1997. Myengsauy mwunpephwa [Grammaticalization of nouns]. Kyujanggak 20: 127–51.Google Scholar

Chung, Sandra. 1976. Case marking and grammatical relations in Polynesian. PhD dissertation, Harvard University.

Chung, Sandra 1977. On the gradual nature of syntactic change. In Li 1977, pp. 3–55.

Clancy, Patricia M. and Thompson, Sandra A. (eds.). 1991. Asian discourse and grammar. Santa Barbara Papers in Linguistics 3. Santa Barbara: University of California.

Clark, Herbert H. and Fox Tree, Jean E.. 2002. Using uh and um in spontaneous speaking. Cognition 84: 73–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Clark, Marybeth. 1979. Coverbs: Evidence for the derivation of prepositions from verbs – new evidence from Hmong. Working Papers in Linguistics (Hawaii) 11, 2: 1–12.Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike. 1985. Zur Entstehung von Genussystemen: Überlegungen zu einigen theoretischen Aspekten, verbunden mit einer Fallstudie des Zande. Hamburg: Helmut Buske.Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike 1986. To have or not to have: On the conceptual base of predicative possession in some African languages. MS, University of Cologne.

Claudi, Ulrike 1993. Die Stellung von Verb und Objekt in Niger-Kongo-Sprachen: Ein Beitrag zur Rekonstruktion historischer Syntax. (Afrikanistische Monographien 1.) Cologne: Universität zu Köln.Google Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike 1994. Word order change as category change: The Mande case. In Pagliuca 1994, pp. 191–232.CrossRef

Claudi, Ulrike and Heine, Bernd. 1986. On the metaphorical base of grammar. Studies in Language 10, 2: 297–335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Claudi, Ulrike and Heine, Bernd 1989. On the nominal morphology of ‘alienability’ in some African languages. In Newman and Botne 1989, pp. 3–19.

Clyne, Paul R., Hanks, William F., and Hofbauer, Carol L. (eds.). 1979. Papers from the Fifteenth Regional Meeting, Chicago Linguistic Society. Chicago: University of Chicago.Google Scholar

Coates, Jennifer. 1995. The expression of root and epistemic possibility in English. In Bybee and Fleischman 1995, pp. 55–66.

Codrington, , Robert, H. 1885. The Melanesian languages. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Cole, Desmond T. [1955] 1987. An introduction to Tswana grammar. 5th impression. Cape Town and Johannesburg: Longman.Google Scholar

Cole, Peter. 1982. Imbabura Quechua. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Colibri, Ediçoes (ed.). 1992. Actas do Colóquio Sobre Crioulos de Base Lexical Portuguesa. Lisbon.Google Scholar

Company Company, Concepción. 2002. Grammaticalization and category weakness. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 201–15.

Comrie, Bernard. 1976. Aspect. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1981. Language universals and linguistic typology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Comrie, Bernard 1992. Before complexity. In Hawkins and Gell-Mann 1992, pp. 193–211.

Comrie, Bernard 1998. Perspectives on grammaticalization. In Ohori 1998a, pp. 7–24.

Comrie, Bernard 2002. Reconstruction, typology and reality. In Hickey 2003, pp. 243–57.CrossRef

Comrie, Bernard and Estrada-Fernández, Zarina (eds.). 2012. Relative clauses in the languages of the Americas: A typological overview. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Comrie, Bernard and Kuteva, Tania, 2005. The evolution of grammatical structures and ‘functional need’ explanations. In Tallerman, Maggie, Language origins: Perspectives on evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Condillac, Etienne Bonnot de. 1746. Essai sur l’origine des connaissances humaines. Paris.Google Scholar

Corbett, Greville. 1987. The morphology/syntax interface: Evidence from possessive adjectives in Slavonic. Language 63, 2: 299–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corne, Chris. 1971. Le patois créole français de la Guyane (St.-Laurent-du-Maroni): Esquisse de grammaire. Te Reo 14: 81–103.Google Scholar

Corne, Chris 1973. Tense and aspect in Mauritian Creole. Te Reo 16: 45–59.Google Scholar

Corne, Chris 1977. Seychelles Creole grammar: Elements for Indian Ocean Proto-Creole reconstruction. (Tübinger Beiträge zur Linguistik 91.) Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Corne, Chris 1988a. Patterns of subject-object coreference in Seychelles Creole. Te Reo 31: 73–84.Google Scholar

Corne, Chris 1988b. Mauritian Creole reflexives. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 3: 69–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Corne, Chris 1989. On French influence in the development of Creole reflexive patterns. Journal of Pidgin and Creole Languages 4: 103–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornillie, Bert. 2004. The shift from lexical to subjective readings in Spanish prometer ‘to promise’ and amenazar ‘to threaten’: A corpus-based account. Pragmatics 14, 1: 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cornillie, Bert 2008. On the grammaticalization and (inter)subjectivity of evidential (semi-) auxiliaries in Spanish. In Seoane and López-Couso 2008, pp. 55–76.CrossRef

Cornillie, Bert and Toledo y Huerta, Álvaro S. Octavio de. 2017. The diachrony of subjective amenazar ‘threaten’: On Latin-induced grammaticalization in Spanish. In Smith et al. 2017, pp. 187–207.

Corominas, J. 1954a. Diccionario crítico etimológico de la lengua castellana, vol. 2: CH–K, indices. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar

Corominas, J. 1954b. Diccionario crítico etimológico de la lengua castellana, vol. 4: Ri–Z, indices. Bern: Francke Verlag.Google Scholar

Corrigan, Roberta L., Moravcsik, Edith A., Ouali, Hamid, and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.). 2009. Formulaic language, vol. 1: Distribution and historical change. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Corver, Norbert and van Riemsdijk, Henk (eds.). 1994. Studies on scrambling: Movement and non-movement approaches to free word-order phenomena. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coseriu, Eugenio. 1976. Das romanische Verbalsystem, ed. Bertsch, Hansbert. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Coseriu, Eugenio 1980. Vom Primat der Geschichte: Oswald Szemerényi zu seinem 65. Geburtstag. Sprachwissenschaft 5: 125–45.Google Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2007. A grammar of Mongsen Ao. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2011. On core case marking patterns in two Tibeto-Burman languages of Nagaland. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 34: 21–47.Google Scholar

Coupe, Alexander R. 2016. On grammaticalization processes in Ao: sources, pathways, and functional extensions. Lecture presented at the University of Düsseldorf, July 2016.

Coupe, Alexander R. 2018. Grammaticalization processes in the languages of South Asia. In Narrog and Heine 2018, pp. 189–218.

Couper-Kuhlen, Elizabeth. 2011. Grammaticalization and conversation. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 424–37.

Coveney, Aidan. 2000. Vestiges of nous and the 1st person plural verb in informal spoken French. Language Sciences 22: 447–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Cowan, J. Ronayne and Schuh, Russell G.. 1976. Spoken Hausa, part 1: Hausa language-grammar. Ithaca, NY: Spoken Language Services.Google Scholar

Cowie, Claire. 1995. Grammaticalization and the snowball effect (review of Grammaticalization [1993]). Language and Communication 15, 2: 181–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Colette G. 1986a. Jacaltec noun classifiers: A study in grammaticalization. Lingua 70: 241–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Colette G. (ed.). 1986b. Noun Classes and Categorization. (Proceedings of a Symposium on Categorization and Noun Classification, Eugene, OR, October 1983.) Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Craig, Colette G. 1987. Rama relational prefixes: From postpositions to verbal prefixes. In DeLancey and Tomlin 1987, pp. 51–71.

Craig, Colette G. 1991. Ways to go in Rama: A case study of polygrammaticalization. In Traugott and Heine 1991b, pp. 455–92.

Crass, Joachim. 2017. Similarity and related functions in Libido. In Treis and Vanhove 2017, pp. 389–417.

Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny. 2008. Ethiopia. In Heine and Nurse 2008, pp. 228–49.

Crass, Joachim and Meyer, Ronny (eds.). 2009. Language contact and language change in Ethiopia. (Topics in Interdisciplinary African Studies 14.) Cologne: Köppe.Google Scholar

Crazzolara, Joseph P. [1938] 1955. A study of the Acooli language. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Crazzolara, Joseph P. 1960. A study of the Logbara (Ma’di) language: Grammar and vocabulary. London, New York, and Toronto: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Creissels, Denis. 2017a. Similarity, suitability, and non-epistemic modalities (volitionality, ability, and obligation). In Treis and Vanhove 2017, pp. 79–89.

Creissels, Denis 2017b. Copulas originating from the imperative of ʽsee/lookʼ verbs in Mande languages. In Bisang and Malchukov 2017, pp. 45–66.

Creissels, Denis In prep.a. Grammaticalization in Tswana. In Bisang and Malchukov, in prep.

Creissels, Denis In prep.b. Grammaticalization in Manding languages. In Bisang and Malchukov, in prep.

Creissels, Denis and Nouguier-Voisin, Sylvie. 2008. Valency-changing operations in Wolof and the notion of co-participation. In König and Gast 2008, pp. 289–305.

Crellin, Robert and Jügel, Th.. Forthcoming. The perfect in Indo-European. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.

Cristofaro, Sonia. 1998. Grammaticalization and clause linkage strategies: A typological approach with particular reference to Ancient Greek. In Giacalone Ramat and Hopper 1998, pp. 59–88.

Croft, William. 1990. Typology and universals. (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William 1991a. The evolution of negation. Journal of Linguistics 27: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 1991b. Syntactic categories and grammatical relations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2000. Explaining language change: An evolutionary approach. London: Longman.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2001. Radical Construction Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William 2003. Typology and universals. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Croft, William 2006. The relevance of an evolutionary model. In Thomsen 2006, pp. 91–132.CrossRef

Croft, William 2007. The origins of grammar in the verbalization of experience. Cognitive Linguistics 18, 3: 339–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William and Cruse, Alan. 2004. Cognitive linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William, Denning, Keith, and Kemmer, Suzanne (eds.). 1990. Studies in typology and diachrony: Papers presented to Joseph H. Greenberg on his 75th birthday. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Croft, William and Poole, Keith T.. 2008. Inferring universals from grammatical variation: Multidimensional scaling for typological analysis. Theoretical Linguistics 34: 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Crowley, Terry. 1982. The Paamese language of Vanuatu. (Pacific Linguistics B-87.) Canberra: Australian National University.

Crowley, Terry and Rigsby, Bruce. 1979. Cape York Creole. In Shopen 1979, pp. 152–207.

Cruz, Juan M. de la. 1977. Synchronic-diachronic remarks on the nature of prefixation. Orbis 26, 2: 262–92.Google Scholar

Csató, Éva Á. 2013. Growing apart in shared grammaticalization. In Robbeets and Cuyckens 2013, pp. 251–8.

Csepregi, Márta. 2008. Az osztjak TAHI ‘hely’ szo helye a mondatban. [The place of the Ostyak word TAHI ‘place’ in the sentence.] In Bereczki, Csepregi, and Klima 2008, pp. 125–35.

Csepregi, Marta 2013. Tobbfunkcios morfemakapcsolatok a szurguti hantiban. [Multifunctional morpheme combinations in Surgut Khanty.] Nyelvtudomanyi Kozlemenyek 109: 91–108.

Cuyckens, Hubert, Vandelanotte, Lieven, and Davidse, Kristin (eds.). 2010. Subjectification, intersubjectification and grammaticalization. The Hague: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen. 1979. Typology of sentence negation. Linguistics 17: 79–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen 1985. Tense and aspect systems. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen 2000a. Verbs of becoming as future copulas. In Dahl 2000b, pp. 351–61.

Dahl, Östen (ed.). 2000b. Tense and aspect in the languages of Europe. (EALT/EUROTYP 20, 6.) Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen 2001. Inflationary effects in language and elsewhere. In Bybee and Hopper 2001, pp. 471–80.CrossRef

Dahl, Östen 2004. The growth and maintenance of linguistic complexity. (Studies in Language Companion Series 71.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Dahl, Östen 2008. Grammatical resources and linguistic complexity: Sirionó as a language without NP coordination. In Miestamo et al. 2008, pp. 153–64.CrossRef

Dahl, Östen 2009. Two pathways of grammatical evolution. In Givón and Shibatani 2009, pp. 239–48.CrossRef

Dahl, Östen 2011. Grammaticalization and linguistic complexity. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 153–62.CrossRef

Dahl, Östen 2015. Grammaticalization in the North: Noun phrase morphosyntax in Scandinavian vernaculars. (Studies in Diversity Linguistics 6.) Berlin: Language Science Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds.). 2001a. Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact, vol. 1: Past and present. (Studies in Language and Companion Series 54.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen and Koptjevskaja-Tamm, Maria (eds.). 2001b. Circum-Baltic languages: Typology and contact, vol. 2: Grammar and typology. (Studies in Language and Companion Series 55.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahl, Östen and Wälchli, Bernhard. 2016. Perfects and iamitives: Two gram types in one grammatical space. Letras de Hoje 51, 3: 325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dahmen, Wolfgang , Günter Holthus, Johannes Kramer, Michael Meltzeltin, Wolfgang Schweickard, and Otto Winkelmann (eds.). 1998. Neuere Beschreibungsmethoden der Syntax romanischer Sprachen. Tübingen: Narr.Google Scholar

Daniel, Michael and Moravcsik, Edith. 2005. The associative plural. In Haspelmath et al. 2005, pp. 150–3.

Daniels, Kelsey. 2014. On the grammaticalization of venga ʽcomeʼ as a discourse marker in Peninsular Spanish. In Devos and van der Wal 2014, pp. 219–47.

Darmon, Chloé. 2017. The morpheme -(ä)ŋä in Xamtanga: Functions and grammaticalisation targets. In Treis and Vanhove 2017, 359–86.

Darnell, Michael, Moravcsik, Edith, Newmeyer, Frederick, Noonan, Michael, and Wheatley, Kathleen (eds.). 1999. Functionalism and Formalism in Linguistics. Volume 1: General Papers. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.Google Scholar

Davidse, Kristin et al. (eds.). 2012. Grammaticalization and language change: New reflections. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de León, , see León

De Guzman, Videa P. and Bender, Byron W. (eds.). 2000. Grammatical analysis of Austronesian and other languages: Studies in honor of Stanley Starosta. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii.Google Scholar

De Mulder, Walter and Carlier, Anne. 2011. The grammaticalization of definite articles. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 519–31.

De Smet, Hendrik. 2010. Grammatical interference: Subject marker for and the phrasal verb particles out and forth. In Traugott and Trousdale 2010, pp. 75–104.

de Sousa, Hilário. 2015. Language contact in Nanning: Nanning Pinghua and Nanning Cantonese. In Chappell 2015a, pp. 157–89.

de Wolf, see Wolf

DeCamp, David et al. (eds.). 1974. Pidgins and creoles: Current trends and prospects. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott. 1983. Agentivity and causation: Data from Newari. Berkeley Linguistics Society 9: 54–63.Google Scholar

DeLancey, Scott 1986. Toward a history of Tai classifier systems. In Craig 1986b, pp. 437–52.CrossRef

DeLancey, Scott 1991. The origins of verb serialization in modern Tibetan. Studies in Language 15, 1: 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLancey, Scott 1997. Mirativity: The grammatical marking of unexpected information. Linguistic Typology 1, 1: 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

DeLancey, Scott 2004. Grammaticalization: from syntax to morphology. In Booij et al. 2004, pp. 1590–9.

DeLancey, Scott 2011. Grammaticalization and syntax: A functional perspective. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 365–77.CrossRef

DeLancey, Scott 2018. Evidentiality in Tibetic. In Aikhenvald 2018b.CrossRef

DeLancey, Scott and Tomlin, Russell (eds.). 1987. Proceedings of the Second Annual Meeting of the Pacific Linguistics Conference. Eugene: University of Oregon.Google Scholar

Dempwolff, Otto. 1934–5. Einführung in die Sprache der Nama-Hottentotten. Zeitschrift für Eingeborenen-Sprachen 25, 1: 30–67.Google Scholar

Denning, Keith. 1987. Obligation and space: The origins of markers of obligative modality. Chicago Linguistic Society 23: 45–55.Google Scholar

Dér, Csilla Ilona and Markó, Alexandra. 2010. A pilot study of Hungarian discourse markers. Language and Speech 53, 2: 135–80.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985a. Hixkaryana. Amsterdam: North-Holland.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. 1985b. Hixkaryana and linguistic typology. Dallas: Summer Institute of Linguistics and University of Texas at Arlington Press.Google Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. and Pullum, Geoffrey (eds.). 1986. Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 1. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. (eds.). 1990. Handbook of Amazonian languages, vol. 2. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Derbyshire, Desmond C. (eds.). 1998. Handbook of Amazonian Languages, vol. 4. Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detges, Ulrich. 2000. Time and truth: The grammaticalization of resultatives and perfects within a theory of subjectification. Studies in Language 24: 345–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Detges, Ulrich 2004. How cognitive is grammaticalization? The history of the Catalan perfet perifràstic. In Fischer, Norde, and Perridon 2004a, pp. 211–27.CrossRef

Detges, Ulrich and Waltereit, Richard. 2007. Different functions, different histories: Modal particles and discourse markers from a diachronic point of view. Catalan Journal of Linguistics 6: 61–81.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy. 2000. Syntactic change in Akkadian: The evolution of sentential complementation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Deutscher, Guy 2011. The grammaticalization of quotatives. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 643–52.CrossRef

Devitt, Dan. 1990. The diachronic development of semantics in copulas. Berkeley Linguistics Society 16: 103–15.Google Scholar

Devitt, Dan 1994. Copula constructions in crosslinguistic and diachronic perspective. PhD dissertation, SUNY-Buffalo.

Devos, Maud. 2004. A grammar of Makwe. PhD dissertation, Leiden University.

Devos, Maud 2008. A grammar of Makwe. Munich: LINCOM.Google Scholar

Devos, Maud 2014. Motion verbs in Shangaci: Lexical semantics and discourse functions. In Devos and van der Wal 2014, pp. 281–317.

Devos, Maud and Wal, Jenneke van der. 2010. ʽGoʼ on a rare grammaticalisation path to focus. In van Kampen and Nouwen 2010, pp. 4–58.

Devos, Maud and Wal, Jenneke van der (eds.). 2014. COME and GO off the beaten grammaticalization path. (Trends in Linguistics Studies and Monographs 272.) Berlin and Boston: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar

Devoto, Giacomo and Oli, Gian Carlo. 1971. Dizionario della lingua italiana. Florence: Le Monnier.Google Scholar

Dickens, Patrick. 2005. A concise grammar of Ju’hoan with a Ju’hoan–English glossary and a subject index, ed Vossen, Rainer and Biesele, Megan. (Quellen zur Khoisan-Forschung 17.) Cologne: Rüdiger Köppe.Google Scholar

Dickinson, Connie. 2000. Mirativity in Tsafiki. Studies in Language 24: 379–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger. 1997. The diachronic reanalysis of demonstratives in crosslinguistic perspective. Chicago Linguistic Society 33: 83–98.Google Scholar

Diessel, Holger 1999a. The morphosyntax of demonstratives in synchrony and diachrony. Linguistic Typology 3: 1–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 1999b. Demonstratives: Form, function, and grammaticalization. (Typological Studies in Language 42.) Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 2003. The relationship between demonstratives and interrogatives. Studies in Language 27, 3: 635–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 17, 4: 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diessel, Holger 2011. Grammaticalization and language acquisition. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 130–41.CrossRef

Diewald, Gabriele. 1997. Eine Einführung in Sein und Werden grammatischer Formen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 103–120.CrossRef

Diewald, Gabriele 2011a. Grammaticalization and pragmaticalization. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 450–61.CrossRef

Diewald, Gabriele 2011b. Pragmaticalization (defined) as grammaticalization of discourse functions. Linguistics 49, 2: 365–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Diewald, Gabriele and Ferraresi, Gisella. 2008. Semantic, syntactic and constructional restrictions in the diachronic rise of modal particles in German: A corpus-based study on the formation of a grammaticalization channel. In Seoane and López-Couso 2008, pp. 77–110.

Diewald, Gabriele and Smirnova, Elena (eds.). 2010. Paradigmaticity and obligatoriness. Special issue: Acta Linguistica Hafnensia 42, 1.

Dik, Simon C. 1987. Copula auxiliation: How and why? In Harris and Ramat 1987, pp. 53–84.

Dik, Simon C. 1997. The theory of Functional Grammar, part 2: Complex and derived constructions. (Functional Grammar Series 21.) Berlin and New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan. 1983. The Turkana language. (Publications in African Languages and Linguistics 2.) Dordrecht and Cinnaminson: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan (ed.). 1986. Current Approaches to African Linguistics, vol. 3. (Publications in African Languages and Linguistics 6.) Dordrecht and Cinnaminson: Foris.Google Scholar

Dimmendaal, Gerrit Jan 1995. The emergence of tense marking in the Nilotic-Bantu borderland as an instance of areal adaptation. In Zima 1995, pp. 29–43.

Disterheft, Dorothy. 1980. The syntactic development of the infinitive in Indo-European. Columbus, OH: Slavica Publishers.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 1980. The languages of Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 1994. Ergativity. (Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 69.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 2002. Australian languages: Their origin and development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 2003. Evidentiality in Jarawara. In Aikhenvald and Dixon 2003, pp. 165–88.

Dixon, Robert M. B. 2004. The Jarawara language of southern Amazonia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 2010a. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 1: Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Dixon, Robert M. B. 2010b. Basic linguistic theory, vol. 2: Grammatical topics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Do-Hurinville, Danh Thành. 2010. Les parties du discours en vietnamien: Grammaticalisation et transcatégorialité. Bulletin de la Société Linguistique de Paris 105, 1: 327–70.Google Scholar

Doke, Clement M. [1927] 1988. Textbook of Zulu grammar. 6th edn. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.Google Scholar

Doke, Clement M. and Mofokeng, S. M.. [1957] 1985. Textbook of Southern Sotho grammar. 2nd edn. Cape Town: Maskew Miller Longman.Google Scholar

Dombrowsky-Hahn, Klaudia. 2012. Grammaticalization of the deictic verbs ʽcomeʼ and ʽgoʼ in Syer. In Mietzner and Claudi 2012, pp. 89–114.

Dostie, Gaetane. 2004. Pragmaticalisation et marqueurs discursifs: Analyse sémantique et traitement lexicographique. Brussels: De Boeck and Larcier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Downing, Bruce T. 1978. Some universals of relative clause structure. In Greenberg, Ferguson, and Moravcsik 1978b, pp. 375–418.

Doyle, Aidan. 2002. Yesterday’s affixes as today’s clitics: A case-study in degrammaticalization. In Wischer and Diewald 2002, pp. 67–81.

Dragomirescu, Adina and Nicolae, Alexandru 2014. The multiple grammaticalization of Romanian veni ʽcomeʼ: Focusing on the passive construction. In Devos and van der Wal 2014, pp. 69–100.

Dressler, Wolfgang U., Kastovsky, Dieter, Pfeiffer, Oskar E., and Rainer, Franz (eds.). 2005. Morphology and its demarcations. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drewes, A. J. 1994. Borrowing in Maltese. In Bakker and Mous 1994, pp. 83–111.

Driem, George van. 1987. A grammar of Limbu. (Mouton Grammar Library 4.) Berlin, New York, and Amsterdam: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Drinka, Birgit. 2012. The Balkan perfects: Grammaticalization and contact. In Wiemer et al. 2012, pp. 511–58.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2006a. Functionalism and the theory-metalanguage confusion. In Wiebe et al. 2006, pp. 27–59.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2006b. Descriptive theories, explanatory theories, and basic linguistic theory. In Ameka, Dench, and Evans 2006, pp. 207–234.

Dryer, Matthew S. 2008. The verbs for ‘and’ in Walman, a Torricelli language of Papua New Guinea. Language 84, 3: 528–65.Google Scholar

Dryer, Matthew S. and Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology.

DuBois, John. 1985. Competing motivations. In Haiman 1985a, pp. 343–65.

DuBois, John 1987. The discourse basis of ergativity. Language 63, 4: 805–55.Google Scholar

Ducrot, Oswald and Vogt, Carlos. 1979. De magis à mais: Une hypothèse sémantique. Revue de Lingistique Romane 43: 317–41.Google Scholar

Dufresne, Didier. 2003. Mais. Tu marches! Paris: L’École de loisirs.Google Scholar

Dufter, Andreas and Stark, Elisabeth. 2008. Double direct object marking in Spanish and Italian. In Seoane and López-Couso 2008, pp. 111–29.

Dunn, Andrea Susan. The pragmatics of selected discourse markers in Swahili. PhD dissertation, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Dürr, Michael. 1988. Reference to space in Colonial Quiché. Función 8: 47–78.Google Scholar

Early, Robert. 2000. Sit, stand, lie: Posture verbs and imperfective. In Palmer, B. and Geraghty, P. (eds.), Sicol. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Oceanic Linguistics, vol. 2: Historical and descriptive studies. (Pacific Linguistics 505.) Canberra: Australian National University, pp. 81–103.

Ebermann, Erwin. 1986. Kleines Wörterbuch der Bambara-Sprache (Deutsch–Bambara, Bambara–Deutsch). Vienna: Afro-Pub.Google Scholar

Ebert, Karen H. 1987. Discourse function of motion verbs in Chadic. Afrikanistische Arbeitspapiere (AAP, Cologne) 10: 53–71.Google Scholar

Ebert, Karen H. 1991. Vom Verbum dicendi zur Konjunktion: Ein Kapitel universaler Grammatikentwicklung. In Bisang and Rinderknecht 1991, pp. 77–95.

Eckhardt, Regine. 2011. Grammaticalization and semantic change. In Narrog and Heine 2011, pp. 389–400.

Eckhardt, Regine 2012. Grammaticalization and semantic reanalysis. In Maienborn et al. 2012, pp. 2675–702.

Eckkrammer, Eva Martha. 2001. Grammatikalisierungsaspekte des Kreolischen der ABC-Inseln. In Schäfer-Prieß et al. 2001, pp. 169–190.

Egan, Thomas. 2017. The subjective and intersubjective uses of ‘fail to’ and ‘not fail to’. In Van Olmen et al. 2017, pp. 167–96.

Egli, Hans. 1990. Paiwangrammatik. Wiesbaden: Otto Harrassowitz.Google Scholar

Eid, M. 1983. The copula function of pronouns. Lingua 59: 197–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Elliott, Jennifer R. 2000. Realis and irrealis: Forms and concepts of the grammaticalisation of reality. Linguistic Typology 4, 1: 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Emanatian, Michele. 1992. Chagga ‘come’ and ‘go’: Metaphor and the development of tense-aspect. Studies in Language 16, 1: 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar