Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-n6p7q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-23T13:51:15.249Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 August 2019

James Conant
Affiliation:
University of Chicago
Sebastian Sunday
Affiliation:
University of Oxford
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

Agam-Segal, Reshef. 2012. Reflecting on Language from “Sideways-on”: Preparatory and Non-Preparatory Aspects-Seeing. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy 1: 117.Google Scholar
Alcoff, Linda Martín. 2010. Epistemic Identities. Episteme 7: 128–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alston, William P. 1964. Philosophy of Language. Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Alston, William P. 2000. Illocutionary Acts and Sentence Meaning. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, Elizabeth. 1995. Knowledge, Human Interests and Objectivity in Feminist Epistemology. Philosophical Topics 23: 2758.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . [1946]. Politics, translated by Barker, Ernest. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, [1955]. Aristotelis Fragmenta Selecta, edited by Ross, W. D.. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, [2000]. Nicomachean Ethics, translated and edited by Crisp, Roger. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1946. Other Minds. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volume 20: 148–87. Cited after the reprint in Austin [1961/79].Google Scholar
Austin, J. L. 1957. A Plea for Excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 57: 130. Cited after the reprint in Austin [1961/79].Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.[1961/79]. Philosophical Papers, third edition, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Warnock, G. J.. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Austin, J. L.[1962/75]. How to Do Things with Words: The William James Lectures Delivered in Harvard University in 1955, second edition, edited by Urmson, J. O. and Marina, Sbisà. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Baker, Gordon. [2004]. Wittgenstein’s Method: Neglected Aspects, edited by Morris, Katherine J.. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S.. 1980/2009. Wittgenstein: Understanding and Meaning, second edition, extensively revised by Hacker, P. M. S.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1984. Language, Sense and Nonsense: A Critical Investigation into Modern Theories of Language. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baker, G. P. and Hacker, P. M. S. 1985/2009. Wittgenstein: Rules, Grammar, and Necessity, second edition, extensively revised by Hacker, P. M. S.. Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner. 2003. On When Words Are Called For: Cavell, McDowell, and the Wording of Our World. Inquiry 46: 473500.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2010. On Learning from Wittgenstein, or What Does It Take to See the Grammar of Seeing Aspects? In Day, William and Krebs, Victor J., eds., Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2011. Seeing Aspects and Philosophical Difficulty. In McGinn, Marie and Kuusela, Oskari, eds., The Oxford Handbook of Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2012. When Words Are Called For: A Defense of Ordinary Language Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2016a. Aspects of Perception. In Kemp, Gary and Mras, Gabriele M., eds., Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation, Routledge.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2016b. The Sound of Bedrock: Lines of Grammar between Kant, Wittgenstein, and Cavell. European Journal of Philosophy 24: 607–28.Google Scholar
Baz, Avner.2017. The Crisis of Method in Contemporary Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bealer, George. 1998. Intuition and the Autonomy of Philosophy. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William, eds., Rethinking Intuition, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Bealer, George 1999. A Theory of the A Priori. Philosophical Perspectives 13: 2955.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael. 1996. Frege: Making Sense. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael.2005. Imagination and Creativity. The Open University.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael.2007. Frege’s Use of Function-Argument Analysis and His Introduction of Truth-Values as Objects. Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 93123.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael.2017a. Analytic Philosophy: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael.2017b. Wittgenstein and Frege. In Glock, Hans-Johann and Hyman, John, eds., A Companion to Wittgenstein, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael.2018. Conceptual Creativity in Philosophy and Logic. In Gaut, Berys and Kieran, Matthew, eds., Creativity and Philosophy, Routledge.Google Scholar
Beaney, Michael and Clark, Bob. 2018. Seeing-As and Mathematical Creativity. In Harrington, Brendan, Shaw, Dominic, and Beaney, Michael, eds., Aspect Perception After Wittgenstein, Routledge.Google Scholar
Black, Max. 1964. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s “Tractatus.” Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. 1990/2004. The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms, second edition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. 1994. What Is Creativity? In Boden, Margaret A., ed., Dimensions of Creativity, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Boden, Margaret A. 2010. Creativity and Art: Three Roads to Surprise. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boghossian, Paul. 1989. The Rule-Following Considerations. Mind 98: 507–49.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. 1994. Making It Explicit: Reasoning, Representing, and Discursive Commitment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Brandom, Robert B. 2000. Articulating Reasons: An Introduction to Inferentialism. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Britton, Karl. 1999. Portrait of a Philosopher. In Flowers, F. A. III, ed., Portraits of Wittgenstein, volume 2, Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Bronzo, Silver. 2017. Wittgenstein, Theories of Meaning, and Linguistic Disjunctivism. European Journal of Philosophy 25: 1340–63.Google Scholar
Burge, Tyler. 2005. Disjunctivism and Perceptual Psychology. Philosophical Topics 33: 178.Google Scholar
Cambiano, Giuseppe. 1993. La figura del filosofo e le altre forme del sapere. Quaderni di Storia 37: 7587.Google Scholar
Cappelen, Herman. 2012. Philosophy without Intuitions. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf. 1939. Foundations of Logic and Mathematics. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf.1945. The Two Concepts of Probability. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 5: 513–32.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf.1950. Logical Foundations of Probability. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Carnap, Rudolf.1963. P. F. Strawson on Linguistic Naturalism. In Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court.Google Scholar
Carus, A. W. 2007. Carnap and Twentieth-Century Thought: Explication as Enlightenment. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley. 1958. Must We Mean What We Say? Inquiry 1: 172212.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley.1962. The Availability of Wittgenstein’s Later Philosophy. The Philosophical Review 71: 6793.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley.1969/2002. Must We Mean What We Say? A Book of Essays, updated edition. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley.1979. The Claim of Reason: Wittgenstein, Skepticism, Morality, and Tragedy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cavell, Stanley.1996. Notes and Afterthoughts on the Opening of Wittgenstein’s Investigations. In Sluga, Hans and Stern, David G., eds., The Cambridge Companion to Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Child, William. 2010. Wittgenstein’s Externalism. In Whiting, Daniel, ed., The Later Wittgenstein on Language, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Child, William.2011. Wittgenstein. Routledge.Google Scholar
Child, William.2017. Sensations, Natural Properties, and the Private Language Argument. In Cahill, Kevin and Raleigh, Thomas, eds., Wittgenstein and Naturalism, Routledge.Google Scholar
Churchland, Paul M. 2005. Cleansing Science. Inquiry 48: 464–77.Google Scholar
Cicero, . [1927]. Tusculan Disputations, translated by King, J. E. (Loeb Classical Library 141). Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Code, Lorraine. 1991. What Can She Know? Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James. 1991. Throwing Away the Top of the Ladder. The Yale Review 79: 328–64.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2001. Philosophy and Biography. In Klagge, James C., ed., Wittgenstein, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2002a. On Going the Bloody Hard Way in Philosophy. In Whittaker, John H., ed., The Possibilities of Sense, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2002b. The Method of the Tractatus. In Reck, Erich H., ed., From Frege to Wittgenstein, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2002c. What Ethics in the Tractatus Is Not. In Philipps, D. Z., ed., Wittgenstein on Ethics and Religion, St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2005. The Dialectic of Perspectivism, I. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 6 (2): 550.Google Scholar
Conant, James.2006. The Dialectic of Perspectivism, II. Sats – Nordic Journal of Philosophy 7 (1): 657.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice. 2002a. What Do Feminists Want in an Epistemology? In O’Connor, Peg and Scheman, Naomi, eds., Re-Reading the Canon, Penn State Press.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice.2002b. Why Can’t Moral Thought Be Everything It Seems? Philosophical Forum 33: 373–92.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice.2007. Beyond Moral Judgment. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice.2012. Dogs and Concepts. Philosophy 87: 215–37.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice.2016. Inside Ethics: On the Demands of Moral Thought. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Crary, Alice.2018. The Methodological Is Political: What’s the Matter with “Analytic Feminism”? Radical Philosophy 202: 4760.Google Scholar
Crystal, David. 1987. The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daston, Lorraine and Galison, Peter. 2007. Objectivity. Zone Books.Google Scholar
Davidson, Arnold I. 1995. Introduction: Pierre Hadot and the Spiritual Phenomenon of Ancient Philosophy. In Hadot, Pierre, Philosophy as a Way of Life, edited by Davidson, Arnold I., translated by Chase, Michael, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald. 1974. On the Very Idea of a Conceptual Scheme. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 47: 520.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald.1984/2001. Inquiries into Truth and Interpretation, second edition. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald.1990. The Structure and Content of Truth. The Journal of Philosophy 87: 297328.Google Scholar
Davidson, Donald.2005. Truth, Language, and History. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
De Mesel, Benjamin. 2017. Wittgenstein and Objectivity in Ethics: A Reply to Brandhorst. Philosophical Investigations 40: 4063.Google Scholar
DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William (eds.). 1998. Rethinking Intuition: The Psychology of Intuition and Its Role in Philosophical Inquiry. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora. 1991. The Realistic Spirit: Wittgenstein, Philosophy, and the Mind. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, Cora.Forthcoming. Ethics: Shifting Perspectives. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2005. Overcoming the Myth of the Mental: How Philosophers Can Profit from the Phenomenology of Everyday Expertise. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 79: 4765.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2007. Detachment, Involvement and Rationality: Are We Essentially Rational Animals? Human Affairs 17: 101109.Google Scholar
Dreyfus, Hubert L. 2013. The Myth of the Pervasiveness of the Mental. In Schear, Joseph K., ed., Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World, Routledge.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. Duckworth.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael 1993a. Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dummett, Michael.1993b. The Seas of Language. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Earlenbaugh, Joshua and Molyneux, Bernard. 2009. Intuitions Are Inclinations to Believe. Philosophical Studies 145: 89109.Google Scholar
Eddington, A. S. 1928. The Nature of the Physical World. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest. 1991. Why Meaning (Probably) Isn’t Conceptual Role. Mind & Language 6: 328–43.Google Scholar
Fodor, Jerry and Lepore, Ernest 1992. Holism: A Shopper’s Guide. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob. 1879. Begriffsschrift: Eine der artihmetischen nachgebildeten Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. L. Nebert.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1884. Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch-mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. W. Koebner. Cited after the translation in Frege [1997], 84129.Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1891. Function und Begriff: Vortrag gehalten in der Sitzung vom 9. Januar 1891 der Jenaischen Gesellschaft für Medicin und Naturwissenschaft. H. Pohle. Cited after the translation “Function and Concept,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1892. Über Begriff und Gegenstand. Vierteljahrsschrift für wissenschaftliche Philosophie 16: 192205. Cited after the translation “On Concept and Object,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob 1918. Der Gedanke – Eine logische Untersuchung. Beiträge zur Philosophie des deutschen Idealismus 1: 5877. Cited after the translation “Thought,” in Frege [1997].Google Scholar
Frege, Gottlob[1997]. The Frege Reader, edited by Beaney, Michael. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Friedman, Michael. 2007. Introduction: Carnap’s Revolution in Philosophy. In Friedman, Michael and Creath, Richard, eds., The Cambridge Companion to Carnap, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaita, Raimond. 1998/2000. A Common Humanity: Thinking About Love and Truth and Justice, second edition. Routledge.Google Scholar
Gaita, Raimond.2002. The Philosopher’s Dog. The Text Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Gellner, Ernest. 1959. Words and Things: An Examination of, and an Attack on, Linguistic Philosophy. V. Gollancz.Google Scholar
George, Alexander. 2000. On Washing the Fur without Wetting It: Quine, Carnap, and Analyticity. Mind 109: 124.Google Scholar
George, Alexander and Velleman, Daniel J.. 2001. Philosophies of Mathematics. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ginsborg, Hannah. 2011. Primitive Normativity and Skepticism about Rules. The Journal of Philosophy 108: 227–54.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann. 1996a. A Wittgenstein Dictionary. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann.1996b. Abusing Use. Dialectica 50: 205–23.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann.2003. Quine and Davidson on Language, Thought and Reality. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann.2010. Concept: Between the Subjective and the Objective. In Cottingham, John and Hacker, P. M. S., eds., Mind, Method and Morality, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann.2015. Meaning and Rule-Following. In Wright, James D., ed., International Encyclopedia of Social and Behavioral Sciences, second edition (volume 14), Elsevier.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann.2017. Philosophy and Philosophical Method. In Glock, Hans-Johann and Hyman, John, eds., A Companion to Wittgenstein, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Glock, Hans-Johann and Preston, John. 1995. Externalism and First-Person Authority. The Monist 78: 515–33.Google Scholar
Goldfarb, Warren. 1983. I Want You to Bring Me a Slab: Remarks on the Opening Sections of the Philosophical Investigations. Synthese 56: 269–72.Google Scholar
Goldman, Alvin and Pust, Joel. 1998. Philosophical Theory and Intuitional Evidence. In DePaul, Michael R. and Ramsey, William, eds., Rethinking Intuition, Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Gottlieb, Anthony. 2000. The Dream of Reason: A History of Western Philosophy from the Greeks to the Renaissance. Norton.Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Martin. 2006. Quine on Explication and Elimination. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 36: 5770.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Martin.2011. Eliminativism, Reference and Vocabulary Replacement: Sellarsian Roots of Rortian Pragmatism. In Knowles, Jonathan and Rydenfelt, Henrik, eds., Pragmatism, Science and Naturalism, Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Martin.2014a. Quine’s Conception of Explication – and Why It Isn’t Carnap’s. In Harman, Gilbert and Lepore, Ernie, eds., A Companion to W. V. O. Quine, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gustafsson, Martin.2014b. Review of Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy, by Paul Horwich. Mind 123: 1195–201.Google Scholar
Guthrie, W. K. C. 1971. Socrates. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1990. Wittgenstein: Meaning and Mind. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hacker, P. M. S. 1996. Wittgenstein: Mind and Will. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hadot, Pierre. 1995. The Figure of Socrates. In Hadot, Pierre, Philosophy as a Way of Life, edited by Davidson, Arnold I., translated by Chase, Michael, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hallett, Garth. 1967. Wittgenstein’s Definition of Meaning as Use. Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Hallett, Garth.1977. A Companion to Wittgenstein’s “Philosophical Investigations.” Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hanfling, Oswald. 2000. Philosophy and Ordinary Language: The Bent and Genius of our Tongue. Routledge.Google Scholar
Harding, Sandra. 1991. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge: Thinking from Women’s Lives. Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Hartsock, Nancy. 1983. The Feminist Standpoint: Developing Grounds for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism. In Harding, Sandra and Hintikka, Merrill, eds., Discovering Reality, D. Reidel.Google Scholar
Hattiangadi, Anandi. 2007. Oughts and Thoughts: Rule-Following and the Normativity of Content. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hertz, Heinrich. 1894. Die Prinzipien der Mechanik: In neuem Zusammenhange dargestellt. J. A. Barth. Cited after the translation The Principles of Mechanics, translated by D. E. Jones and J. T. Walley (Macmillan, 1899).Google Scholar
Hintikka, Jaakko. 1999. The Emperor’s New Intuitions. The Journal of Philosophy 96: 127–47.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul. 1993. Meaning and Metaphilosophy. Philosophical Issues 4: 152–8.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.1998. Meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2005. Reflections on Meaning. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2008. Explaining Intentionality. Manuscrito 31: 467–82.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2010a. Truth – Meaning – Reality. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2010b. Wittgenstein’s Definition of “Meaning” as “Use.” In Whiting, Daniel, ed., The Later Wittgenstein on Language, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2012. Wittgenstein’s Metaphilosophy. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2013. Naturalism, Deflationism and the Relative Priority of Language and Metaphysics. In Price, Huw, ed., Expressivism, Pragmatism, and Representationalism, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Horwich, Paul.2014. Naturalism and the Linguistic Turn. In Bashour, Bana and Muller, Hans D., eds., Contemporary Philosophical Naturalism and Its Implications, Routledge.Google Scholar
Hylton, Peter. 2007. Quine. Routledge.Google Scholar
Joël, Karl. 1893. Der echte und der Xenophontische Sokrates. R. Gaertner.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel. [2003]. Samuel Johnson: Selected Essays, edited by Womersley, David. Penguin.Google Scholar
Johnston, Paul. 1993. Wittgenstein: Rethinking the Inner. Routledge.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1781/7. Kritk der reinen Vernunft. J. F. Hartknoch. Cited after the translation Critique of Pure Reason, translated and edited by Guyer, Paul and Wood, Allen W. (Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel.1790/3. Kritik der Urteilskraft. Lagarde und Friederich. Cited after the translation Critique of the Power of Judgment, edited by Guyer, Paul, translated bGuyer, y Paul and Matthews, Eric (Cambridge University Press, 2000).Google Scholar
Kearns, Stephen and Magidor, Ofra. 2012. Semantic Sovereignty. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 85: 322–50.Google Scholar
Klagge, James C. 2010. Das erlösende Wort. In Munz, Volker, Puhl, Klaus, and Wang, Joseph, eds., Language and World, Part Two, Ontos.Google Scholar
Koffka, Kurt. 1921/8. The Growth of the Mind: An Introduction to Child-Psychology, second edition (revised), translated by Ogden, Robert Morris. Harcourt, Brace and Company. Cited after the 2007 edition by Kessinger.Google Scholar
Köhler, Wolfgang. 1929/47. Gestalt Psychology: An Introduction to New Concepts in Modern Psychology. Liveright.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 1972/80. Naming and Necessity [slightly revised book edition of “Naming and Necessity,” in Davidson, Donald and Harman, Gilbert, eds., Semantics of Natural Language (D. Reidel, 1972)]. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kripke, Saul A. 1982. Wittgenstein on Rules and Private Language: An Elementary Exposition. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kusch, Martin. 2009. Objectivity and Historiography. Isis 100: 127–31.Google Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari. 2008. The Struggle against Dogmatism: Wittgenstein and the Concept of Philosophy. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari.2014. The Method of Language-Games as a Method of Logic. Philosophical Topics 42: 129–60.Google Scholar
Kuusela, Oskari.2019. Wittgenstein on Logic as the Method of Philosophy: Re-Examining the Roots and Development of Analytic Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1983. New Work for a Theory of Universals. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 6: 343–77.Google Scholar
Lewis, David.1984. Putnam’s Paradox. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 62: 221–36.Google Scholar
Ludlow, Peter. 1997. Introduction [to Part I]. In Ludlow, Peter, ed., Readings in the Philosophy of Language, MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Kirk. 2010. Intuitions and Relativity. Philosophical Psychology 23: 427–45.Google Scholar
Lycan, William G. 1999. Philosophy of Language: A Contemporary Introduction. Routledge.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1999. Dependent Rational Animals: Why Human Beings Need the Virtues. Open Court.Google Scholar
Marcuse, Herbert. 1964. One-Dimensional Man: Studies in the Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society. Beacon Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John. 1979. Virtue and Reason. The Monist 62: 331–50.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1983. Aesthetic Value, Objectivity, and the Fabric of the World. In Schaper, Eva, ed., Pleasure, Preference and Value, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1981. Non-Cognitivism and Rule-Following. In Holtzmann, Steven H. and Leich, Christopher M., eds., Wittgenstein, Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
McDowell, John.1984. Wittgenstein on Following a Rule. Synthese 58: 325–63.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1986. Critical Notice [of Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy, by Bernard Williams]. Mind 95: 377–86.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1989. One Strand in the Private Language Argument. Grazer Philosophische Studien 33/4: 285303.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1994/6. Mind and World, with a new introduction. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.1998. Mind, Value, and Reality. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.2007. What Myth? Inquiry 50: 338–51.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.2008. Avoiding the Myth of the Given. In Lindgaard, Jakob, ed., John McDowell, Blackwell. Cited after the reprint in McDowell 2009.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.2009. Having the World in View: Essays on Kant, Hegel, and Sellars. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.2013a. Concepts in Perceptual Experience: Putnam and Travis. In Baghramian, Maria, ed., Reading Putnam, Routledge.Google Scholar
McDowell, John.2013b. The Myth of the Mind as Detached. In Schear, Joseph K., ed., Mind, Reason, and Being-in-the-World, Routledge.Google Scholar
McFee, Graham. 1999. Wittgenstein on Art and Aspects. Philosophical Investigations 22: 262–84.Google Scholar
McGinn, Colin. 1984. Wittgenstein on Meaning: An Interpretation and Evaluation. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Merleau-Ponty, Maurice. 1945. Phénoménologie de la perception. Gallimard. Cited after both the 2002 edition of the translation Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Colin Smith (Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1962) and the translation Phenomenology of Perception, translated by Donald A. Landes (Routledge, 2012).Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 1988. Alternative Epistemologies. Social Theory and Practice 14: 237–63.Google Scholar
Mills, Charles W. 2005. “Ideal Theory” as Ideology. Hypatia 20: 165–83.Google Scholar
Momigliano, Arnoldo. 1971. The Development of Greek Biography. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Monk, Ray. 1999. Review of Ben Rogers’s A. J. Ayer: A Life. The Sunday Times, June 13, book section.Google Scholar
Morris, Katherine J. 2007. Wittgenstein’s Method: Ridding People of Philosophical Prejudices. In Kahane, Guy, Kanterian, Edward, and Kuusela, Oskari, eds., Wittgenstein and his Interpreters, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Morris, Katherine J. 2017. Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty on Gestalt Psychology. In Romdenh-Romluc, Komarine, ed., Wittgenstein and Merleau-Ponty, Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen. 1990. On Being in the World: Wittgenstein and Heidegger on Seeing Aspects. Routledge.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen.2001. Seeing Aspects. In Glock, Hans-Johann, ed., Wittgenstein, Blackwell.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen.2009. The Wounded Animal: J. M. Coetzee and the Difficulty of Reality in Literature and Philosophy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mulhall, Stephen.2010. The Work of Wittgenstein’s Words: A Reply to Baz. In Day, William and Krebs, Victor J., eds., Seeing Wittgenstein Anew, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas. 1979. Subjective and Objective. In Nagel, Thomas, Mortal Questions, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nagel, Thomas.1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Novaes, Catarina Dutilh and Erich, Reck. 2017. Carnapian Explication, Formalisms as Cognitive Tools, and the Paradox of Adequate Formalization. Synthese 194: 195215.Google Scholar
Peacocke, Christopher. 2001. Phenomenology and Nonconceptual Content. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 62: 609–15.Google Scholar
Pearson, James. 2017. Caring for Quine’s Don’t-Cares. The Monist 100: 266–87.Google Scholar
Peregrin, Jaroslav. 2014. Inferentialism: Why Rules Matter. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Pichler, Alois. 1991. Ludwig Wittgenstein, Vermischte Bemerkungen: Liste der Manuskriptquellen / Ludwig Wittgenstein, Culture and Value: A List of Source Manuscripts. The Wittgenstein Archives at the University of Bergen.Google Scholar
Plato, . [1961]. The Collected Dialogues of Plato: Including the Letters, edited by Hamilton, Edith and Cairns, Huntingdon. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Porphyry, . [1987]. To Marcella, 31. In Long, Anthony and Sedley, David, eds., The Hellenistic Philosophers, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pust, Joel. 2004. On Explaining Knowledge of Necessity. Dialectica 58: 7187.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary. 1975. The Meaning of “Meaning.” Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 7: 131–93.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary.1977. Realism and Reason. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 50: 483–98.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary.1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary.1990. Realism with a Human Face, edited by Conant, James. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, Hilary.2002. The Collapse of the Fact/Value Distinction and Other Essays. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O. 1950. Methods of Logic. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1951. Two Dogmas of Empiricism. The Philosophical Review 60: 2043. Cited after the reprint in Quine 1953/61.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1953. Mr. Strawson on Logical Theory. Mind 62: 433–51.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1953/61. From a Logical Point of View: Nine Logico-Philosophical Essays, second edition, revised. Harvard University Press. Cited after the 1963 edition by Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1960. Word and Object. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1969. Ontological Relativity and Other Essays. Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Quine, W. V. O 1981. Theories and Things. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Reck, Erich. 2012. Carnapian Explication: A Case Study and Critique. In Wagner, Pierre, ed., Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Reddy, Vasudevi. 2008. How Infants Know Minds. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rhees, Rush. 1974. Wittgenstein. The Human World 14 (February).Google Scholar
Richardson, Alan. 2004. Tolerating Semantics: Carnap’s Philosophical Point of View. In Awodey, Steve and Klein, Carsten, eds., Carnap Brought Home, Open Court.Google Scholar
Ricketts, Thomas. 2003. Languages and Calculi. In Hardcastle, Gary L. and Richardson, Alan W., eds., Logical Empiricism in North America, University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1979. Philosophy and the Mirror of Nature. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard.1982. Consequences of Pragmatism. University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Rundle, Bede. 1979. Grammar in Philosophy. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Rundle, Bede.1990. Wittgenstein and Contemporary Philosophy of Language. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert. 1945. Philosophical Arguments: An Inaugural Lecture Delivered before the University of Oxford, 30 October 1945. Clarendon Press. Cited after the reprint in Ryle 1971b.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.1951. Ludwig Wittgenstein. Analysis 12: 19.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.1953. Ordinary Language. The Philosophical Review 62: 167–86. Cited after the reprint in Ryle 1971b.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.1966. Jane Austen and the Moralists. The Oxford Review 1: 518.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.1971a. Collected Papers Volume 1: Critical Essays. Hutchinson. Cited after the 2009 edition by Routledge.Google Scholar
Ryle, Gilbert.1971b. Collected Papers Volume 2: Collected Essays 1929–1968. Hutchinson. Cited after the 2009 edition by Routledge.Google Scholar
von Savigny, Eike. 1983. Zum Begriff der Sprache: Konvention, Bedeutung, Zeichen. Reclam.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Severin. 2006. Wittgenstein: The Way out of the Fly Bottle. Polity.Google Scholar
Schroeder, Severin.2010. A Tale of Two Problems: Wittgenstein’s Discussion of Aspect Perception. In Cottingham, John and Hacker, P. M. S., eds., Mind, Method and Morality, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schulte, Joachim. 1987/93. Experience and Expression: Wittgenstein’s Philosophy of Psychology. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Searle, John R. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid. 1956. Empiricism and the Philosophy of Mind. Minnesota Studies in the Philosophy of Science 1: 253329. Cited after the 1997 book edition by Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sellars, Wilfrid.1974. Meaning as Functional Classification (A Perspective on the Relation of Syntax to Semantics). Synthese 27: 417–34.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest. 2006. Intuitions and Truth. In Greenough, Partick and Lynch, Michael P., eds., Truth and Realism, Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest 2007. Experimental Philosophy and Philosophical Intuition. Philosophical Studies 132: 99107.Google Scholar
Sosa, Ernest 2009. A Defense of the Use of Intuitions in Philosophy. In Murphy, Dominic and Bishop, Michael, eds., Stich and His Critics, Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Stein, Howard. 1992. Was Carnap Entirely Wrong, after All? Synthese 93: 275–95.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. F. 1952. Introduction to Logical Theory. Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1959. Individuals: An Essay in Descriptive Metaphysics. Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1963. Carnap’s Views on Constructed Systems vs. Natural Languages in Analytic Philosophy. In Schilpp, P. A., ed., The Philosophy of Rudolf Carnap, Open Court.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1966. The Bounds of Sense: An Essay on Kant’s Critique of Pure Reason. Methuen.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1970. Imagination and Perception. In Foster, Lawrence and Swanson, J. W., eds., Experience and Theory, University of Massachusetts Press.Google ScholarGoogle Scholar
Strawson, P. 1992. Analysis and Metaphysics: An Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Strawson, P. 1995. My Philosophy. In Sen, Pranab Kumar and Verma, Roop Rekha, eds., The Philosophy of P. F. Strawson, Allied Publishers.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry. 2000. Meaning, Understanding, and Practice: Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Stroud, Barry.2012. Meaning and Understanding. In Ellis, Jonathan and Guevara, Daniel, eds., Wittgenstein and the Philosophy of Mind, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Sunday Grève, Sebastian. 2015. The Importance of Understanding Each Other in Philosophy. Philosophy 90: 213–39.Google Scholar
Sunday Grève, Sebastian 2018. Logic and Philosophy of Logic in Wittgenstein. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 96: 168–82.Google Scholar
Sunday Grève, Sebastian and Mácha, Jakub (eds.). 2016. Wittgenstein and the Creativity of Language. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Symons, John. 2008. Intuition and Philosophical Methodology. Axiomathes 18: 6789.Google Scholar
Tanney, Julia. 2013. Rules, Reasons, and Self-Knowledge. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Tanney, Julia.2014. Rule-Following, Intellectualism and Logical Reasoning: On the Importance of a Type-distinction Between Performances and “Propositional Knowledge” of the Norms That Govern Them. In Moyal-Sharrock, Danièle, Munz, Volker, and Coliva, Annalisa, eds., Mind, Language, and Action, De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Tanney, Julia.2019. What Knowledge Is Not: Reflections on Some Uses of the Verb “To Know.” In Valaris, Markos and Hetherington, Stephen, eds., Knowledge in Contemporary Philosophy, Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Tranøy, Knut Erik. 1999. Wittgenstein in Cambridge 1949–1951: Some Personal Recollections. In F. A. Flowers III, ed., Portraits of Wittgenstein, volume 4. Thoemmes Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Charles. 2013. Perception: Essays after Frege. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Travis, Charles.2015. Suffering Intentionally? In Campbell, Michael and O’Sullivan, Michael, eds., Wittgenstein and Perception, Routledge.Google Scholar
Travis, Charles.2016. The Room in a View. In Kemp, Gary and Mras, Gabriele M., eds., Wollheim, Wittgenstein, and Pictorial Representation, Routledge.Google Scholar
Vision, Gerald. 1998. Perceptual Content. Philosophy 73: 395427.Google Scholar
Wagner, Pierre (ed.). 2012. Carnap’s Ideal of Explication and Naturalism. Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Wallgren, Thomas. 2013. Radical Enlightenment Optimism: Socrates and Wittgenstein. In Perissinotto, Luigi and Cámara, Begoña Ramón, eds., Wittgenstein and Plato, Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Weinberg, Jonathan M., Nichols, Shaun, and Stich, Stephen. 2001. Normativity and Epistemic Intuitions. Philosophical Topics 29: 429–60.Google Scholar
Whiting, Daniel. 2018. Conceptual Role Semantics. In Fieser, James and Dowden, Bradley, eds., The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy, www.iep.utm.edu (last accessed on 15 August 2018).Google Scholar
Wiggins, David. 1987/2002. Needs, Values, Truth: Essays in the Philosophy of Value, third edition. Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1978. Descartes: The Project of Pure Enquiry. Penguin.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard.1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy. 2004. Philosophical “Intuitions” and Scepticism about Judgement. Dialectica 58: 109–53.Google Scholar
Williamson, Timothy.2007. The Philosophy of Philosophy. Blackwell.Google Scholar
Winch, Peter. 1981. “Eine Einstellung zur Seele.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 81: 116.Google Scholar
Wisdom, John. 1945. Gods. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 45: 185206.Google Scholar
Wisdom, John.1991. Proof and Explanation: The Virginia Lectures, edited by Barker, Stephen F.. University Press of America.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. 1980. Seeing-as, Seeing-in, and Pictorial Representation. In Wollheim, Richard, Art and Its Objects, second edition, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard.2001. On Pictorial Representation. In van Gerwen, Rob, ed., Richard Wollheim on the Art of Painting, Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Crispin. 1980. Wittgenstein on the Foundations of Mathematics. Duckworth.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik. 1982. Wittgenstein. Blackwell.Google Scholar
von Wright, Georg Henrik.1989. Autobiography. In Schilpp, P. A. and Hahn, Lewis Edwin, eds., The Philosophy of Georg Henrik von Wright, Open Court.Google Scholar
Zerilli, Linda M. G. 2016. A Democratic Theory of Judgment. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Edited by James Conant, University of Chicago, Sebastian Sunday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Wittgenstein on Philosophy, Objectivity, and Meaning
  • Online publication: 15 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Edited by James Conant, University of Chicago, Sebastian Sunday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Wittgenstein on Philosophy, Objectivity, and Meaning
  • Online publication: 15 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Edited by James Conant, University of Chicago, Sebastian Sunday, University of Oxford
  • Book: Wittgenstein on Philosophy, Objectivity, and Meaning
  • Online publication: 15 August 2019
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108151764.014
Available formats
×