Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-bhjbq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-26T21:35:13.092Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

Part V

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2017

Elizabeth de Freitas
Manchester Metropolitan University
Nathalie Sinclair
Simon Fraser University, British Columbia
Alf Coles
University of Bristol
Get access
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)



Ahmed, S. (2010). The promise of happiness. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, K., & Mendick, H. (2012). Young people’s uses of celebrity: Class, gender and ‘improper’ celebrity. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 34(1), 7793.Google Scholar
Bellos, A. (2015). How to solve the maths GCSE question about Hannah’s sweets that went viral. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from
Campbell, B. (2015). Hitler reacts to Edexcel GCSE Maths 1MA0 Paper 1. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from
Department for Education (2014). National curriculum in England: Mathematics programmes of study. Retrieved 8 July 2015, from
Derrida, J. (1981/2002). Positions. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Duchin, M. (2004). The sexual politics of genius. Retrieved 8 July 2015, from
Falacci, N. & Heuton, C. (Writers). (2005–2010). Numb3rs. New York: CBS.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1972). The archaeology of knowledge. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. (1976). The history of sexuality (volume 1): The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (1996). Queer(y)ing capitalist organization. Organization, 3(4), 541545.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardy, G. H. (1940/1969). A mathematician’s apology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hossain, S., Mendick, H. & Adler, J. (2013). Troubling “understanding mathematics in-depth”: Its role in the identity work of student-teachers in England. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 84(1): 3548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Littler, J. (2013). Meritocracy as plutocracy: The marketising of ‘equality’ under neoliberalism. New Formations, 80/81, 5272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Llewellyn, A. (2012). Unpacking understanding: The (re)search for the Holy Grail of mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 81(3), 385399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, L. (1999). Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Mendick, H. (2006). Masculinities in mathematics. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press (McGraw-Hill Education).Google Scholar
momoneymopingu, (2015). Hitler reacts to GCSE Edexcel Maths (Paper 1 June 2015). Retrieved 22 July 2015, from
Noriega, M. (2015). Read the rejection letters Disney used to send any woman who wanted to be an animator. Retrieved 22 July 2015, from
Sedgwick, E. K. (1993/2002). What’s queer? Retrieved 22 July 2015, from
Shulman, L. S. (1999). Introduction, in Ma, L., Knowing and teaching elementary mathematics (pp. ixxii). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Stinson, D. (2013). Negotiating the “white male math myth”: African American male students and success in school mathematics. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 44(1), 6999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walkerdine, V. (1988). The mastery of reason: Cognitive development and the production of rationality. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Walkerdine, V. (1990). Schoolgirl fictions. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Walkerdine, V. (1989/1998). Counting girls out (2nd ed.). London: Falmer.Google Scholar
Wilchins, R. (2004). Queer theory, gender theory: An instant primer. Los Angeles, CA: Alyson Books.Google Scholar


Appelbaum, P. (1995). Popular culture, educational discourse, and mathematics. Albany: SUNY Press.Google Scholar
Barwell, R. (2009). Researchers’ descriptions and the construction of mathematical thinking. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 79(2), 255269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barwell, R. & Abtahi, Y. (2015). Morality and news media representations of mathematics education. In Mukhopadhyay, S. & Greer, B. (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eighth International Mathematics Education and Society Conference (pp. 298311). Portland, OR: Portland State University.Google Scholar
Camara, W. J. & Shaw, E. J. (2012). The media and educational testing: In pursuit of the truth or in pursuit of a good story? Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 31(2), 3337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eccles, J. S. & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs, 11(2), 367380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. (1991). Categories are for talking: On the discursive and cognitive bases of categorization. Theory & Psychology, 1(4), 515542.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Edwards, D. & Potter, J. (1992). Discursive psychology. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Entman, R. M. (1993). Framing: Toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 5158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ertl, H. (2006). Educational standards and the changing discourse on education: The reception and consequences of the PISA study in Germany. Oxford Review of Education, 32(5), 619634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gamson, W. A. (1977). Talking politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gruber, K.-H. (2006). The German ‘PISA-Shock’: Some aspects of the extraordinary impact of the OECD’s PISA study on the German education system. In Ertl, H. (Ed.), Cross-national attraction in education: Accounts from England and Germany (pp. 195208). Oxford: Symposium Books.Google Scholar
Kee, C. P., Ibrahim, F., Ahmad, F. & Khiang, C. C. (2012). Frame contention between news sources and news media: Framing the dispute of teaching Mathematics and Science in English. Asian Social Science, 8(5), 1647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lange, T. & Meaney, T. (2014). It’s just as well kids don’t vote: The positioning of children through public discourse around national testing. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26, 377397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pons, X. (2012). Going beyond the ‘PISA shock’ discourse: An analysis of the cognitive reception of PISA in six European countries, 2001–2008. European Educational Research Journal, 11, 206226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, V. & Tewksbury, D. (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In Barett, G. A. & Boster, F. J (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (pp. 173212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.Google Scholar
Scheufele, D. & Tewksbury, D. (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 920.Google Scholar
Semetko, H. A. & Valkenburg, P. M. (2000). Framing European politics: A content analysis of press and television news. Journal of Communication, 50(2), 93109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldow, F. (2009). Review essay: What PISA did and did not do: Germany after the ‘PISA-shock’. European Educational Research Journal, 8(3), 476483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar


Badiou, A. (2009). Logics of worlds. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. (2011). Mathematics education and subjectivity: Cultures and cultural renewal. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T. & McNamara, O. (2011). Becoming a mathematics teacher: Identity and identifications. Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T., Heywood, D., Solomon, Y. & Zagorianakos, A. (2012). Experiencing the space we share. ZDM: The International Journal of Mathematics Education, 45(4), 561572.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (1996). What is philosophy? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Doxiadis, A. & Mazur, B. (Eds.) (2012). Circles disturbed: The interplay of mathematics and narrative. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Feltham, O. (2008). Alain Badiou: Live theory. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hawking, S. & Mlodinow, L. (2010). The grand design. New York: Bantam.Google Scholar
Lundin, S. (2012). Hating school, loving mathematics: The ideological function of critique and reform in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 7385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malabou, M. (2011). Is confession the accomplishment of recognition? Rousseau and the unthought of religion. In Žižek, S, Crockett, C, & Davis, C (Eds.), Hegel and the infinite: Religion, politics and dialectic (pp. 19–30). New York, Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Pais, A. & Valero, P. (2012). Researching research: Mathematics education in the Political. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 80(1–2), 924.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palmer, A. (2011). ‘‘How many sums can I do’’? Performative strategies and diffractive thinking as methodological tools for rethinking mathematical subjectivity. Reconceptualizing Educational Research Methodology, 1(1), 318.Google Scholar
Paton, G. (2012). Numeracy campaign: 17m adults ‘struggle with primary school maths’, The Telegraph, 2 March.
Piaget, J. (1952). The child’s conception of number. London: Routledge.
Skovsmose, O. (1994). Towards a philosophy of critical mathematics education. Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Žižek, S. (1989). The sublime object of ideology. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (1997). The plague of fantasies. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2001). Did somebody say totalitarianism? London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2006). How to read Lacan. London: Granta.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2011). The spectre of ideology. In Szeman, I. & Kaposy, T. (Eds.), Cultural theory: An anthology pp. 228–244. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. (2012). Less than nothing: Hegel and the shadow of dialectical materialism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Žižek, S. & Millbank, J. (2009). The monstrosity of Christ: Paradox or dialectic? Davis, C. (Ed.). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats