Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-pkt8n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-21T13:19:43.239Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Connecting climate and hydrological models for impacts studies

from Part I - Past, present and future climate

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2011

Emily Black
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Steven Mithen
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Emily Black
Affiliation:
University of Reading
Get access

Summary

ABSTRACT

Driving hydrological models with climate data is a tough challenge – whether the data are from the observational record or climate models. One reason for this is that many hydrological models require long daily time-series of precipitation and evaporation. The scarcity of appropriate observed data in many parts of the MENA region is therefore a potential constraint for the development of such models. Although climate models have the capacity to produce daily time-series for the whole region, the results of impacts studies driven directly by model output would be prejudiced by model error – particularly in precipitation, which is one of the most difficult variables to simulate. This chapter describes how these problems can be addressed by using a simple statistical rainfall model (weather generator) in conjunction with a regional climate model. This enables climate model bias to be corrected, observed monthly data to be disaggregated and the length of a precipitation time-series to be extended.

INTRODUCTION

Driving hydrological models with climate model data provides a key means to understand the hydrological systems of the MENA region, how water availability has changed in the past and how it is projected to change in the future. In cases when it is not appropriate or not possible to use raw model output to drive a hydrological model, a statistical rainfall model (also known as a stochastic weather generator) can be used as an intermediate step.

Type
Chapter
Information
Water, Life and Civilisation
Climate, Environment and Society in the Jordan Valley
, pp. 63 - 68
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Furrer, E. M. and Katz, R. W. (2007) Generalized linear modeling approach to stochastic weather generators. Climate Research 34: 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gabriel, K. R. and Neumann, J. (1962) A Markov chain model for daily rainfall occurrence at Tel Aviv. Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society 88: 90–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hansen, J. W. and Ines, A. V. M. (2005) Stochastic disaggregation of monthly rainfall data for crop simulation studies. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 131: 233–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hutchinson, M. F. (1995) Stochastic space-time weather models from ground-based data. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 73: 237–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, P. D., Harpham, C., Kilsby, C. G., Glenis, B. and Burton, A. (2009) Projections of future daily climate for the UK from the Weather Generator. UK Climate Projections Science Reports3. University of Newcastle.Google Scholar
Roldan, J. and Woolhiser, D. A. (1982) Stochastic daily precipitation models: 1. A comparison of occurrence processes. Water Resources Research 18: 1451–1459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, R., Rimmer, A. and Alpert, P. (2009) Effect of extreme rainfall events on the water resources of the Jordan River. Journal of Hydrology 375: 513–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Semenov, M. A. and Barrow, E. M. (1997) Use of a stochastic weather generator in the development of climate change scenarios. Climatic Change 35: 397–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilks, D. S. (1995) Statistical Methods in the Atmospheric Sciences: An Introduction. San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Wilks, D. S. and Wilby, R. L. (1999) The weather generation game: a review of stochastic weather models. Progress in Physical Geography 23: 329–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×