Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-684899dbb8-7wlv9 Total loading time: 0.682 Render date: 2022-05-22T08:33:13.444Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true }

11 - An Argument for Use of a Test of Productive Grammatical Ability for Placement into Writing Classes

from Part III - Investigating Score Uses and Consequences

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 January 2021

Carol A. Chapelle
Affiliation:
Iowa State University
Erik Voss
Affiliation:
Teachers College, Columbia University
Get access

Summary

This chapter demonstrates the construction of a validity argument for use of a new test of productive academic grammar test as one source of data for placement of students into academic writing classes. Drawing upon an argument-based approach, warrants and assumptions for the utilization and consequence implication inferences were developed to guide the investigation. Mixed methods were used to investigate hypothetical placement outcomes and impacts of academic grammar test score use on the program, test takers, and ESL writing instructors. Findings supported the assumptions by showing that (a) the value of grammatical writing ability is appreciated by all stakeholder groups; (b) academic grammar test scores can identify false positives identified as qualifying for ESL writing exemption; and (c) both test takers and ESL writing instructors would benefit from the use of academic grammar test scores for ESL writing placement and diagnostic feedback that could be generated. This study demonstrates that prospective test use and consequences can be investigated even at a pilot testing stage, when test developers should identify and minimize potential negative impact on stakeholders to improve the quality of the test and the compose appropriate advice about its use.

Type
Chapter
Information
Validity Argument in Language Testing
Case Studies of Validation Research
, pp. 264 - 293
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bachman, L. F. (2005). Building and supporting a case for test use. Language Assessment Quarterly, 2(1), 134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, L. F., & Palmer, A. (2010). Language assessment in practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, L. (2014). Consequences, impact, and washback. In Kunnan, A. J. (Ed.), The companion to language assessment (pp. 11301146). Chichester: John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118411360.wbcla071Google Scholar
Chapelle, C. A., Chung, Y.-R., Hegelheimer, V., Pendar, N., & Xu, J. (2010). Towards a computer-delivered test of productive grammatical ability. Language Testing, 27(4), 443469. https://doi.org/10.1177/0265532210367633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chung, Y.-R. (2014). A test of productive English grammatical ability in academic writing: Development and validation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Iowa State University, Ames, IA.Google Scholar
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. (1988). Five perspectives on validity argument. In Wainer, H. (Ed.), Test validity (pp. 317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Kane, M. (2016). Explicating validity. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 198211.Google Scholar
McNamara, T. (2006). Validity in language testing: The challenge of Sam Messick’s legacy. Language Assessment Quarterly, 3(1), 3151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Messick, S. (1989). Validity. In Linn, R. L (Ed.), Educational measurement (3rd ed., pp. 13103). New York: American Council on Education/Macmillan Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Messick, S. (1996). Validity of performance assessments. In Phillips, G. W. (Ed.), Technical issues in large-scale performance assessment (pp. 118). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.Google Scholar
Moss, P. A. (1998). The role of consequences in validity theory. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 17(2), 612.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sireci, S. G. (2016). On the validity of useless tests. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 23(2), 226235. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2015.1072084Google Scholar
Thompson, J. B. (1990). Ideology and modern culture. In Thompson, J. B. (Ed.), The methodology of interpretation (pp. 272327). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×