Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- 2 Integrating Economic Analysis into WTO Dispute Settlement Practice: A View from the Trenches
- 3 Present at the Creation: Economists and Accountants in International Trade Law Practice
- 4 The Role of Economics in WTO Dispute Settlement and Choosing the Right Litigation Strategy – A Practitioner’s View
- 5 On Interpretation and Economic Analysis of Law
- 6 The Client’s Perspective
- 7 The Use of Economics in Competition Law: What Works and What Doesn’t Across National Jurisdictions?
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
4 - The Role of Economics in WTO Dispute Settlement and Choosing the Right Litigation Strategy – A Practitioner’s View
from Part I - The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 13 April 2017
Book contents
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures and Tables
- Contributors
- Acknowledgements
- 1 Introduction
- Part I The Use of Economics in International Trade and Investment Disputes: A Practitioner’s View
- 2 Integrating Economic Analysis into WTO Dispute Settlement Practice: A View from the Trenches
- 3 Present at the Creation: Economists and Accountants in International Trade Law Practice
- 4 The Role of Economics in WTO Dispute Settlement and Choosing the Right Litigation Strategy – A Practitioner’s View
- 5 On Interpretation and Economic Analysis of Law
- 6 The Client’s Perspective
- 7 The Use of Economics in Competition Law: What Works and What Doesn’t Across National Jurisdictions?
- Part II The Use of Economics in International Trade Disputes: Economic Versus Legal Thinking
- Part III The Use of Economics in International Investment Disputes: Liability and Damages
- Conclusion
- Appendix to the Conclusion
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
van Aaken, Anne (2010) “Opportunities for and Limits to an Economic Analysis of International Law,” Working Paper, ssrn.com/abstract=1635390.Google Scholar
Babcock, Bruce and Paulson, Nick (2012) “The Potential Impact of Proposed 2012 Farm Bill Commodity Programs on Developing Countries,” International Centre for Trade and Sustainable Development; ICTSD Issue Paper No. 45, available at www.ictsd.org/downloads/2013/09/potential-impact-of-proposed-2012-farm-bill-commodity-programs-on-developing-countries.pdf.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2009) Self-Enforcing Trade: Developing Countries and WTO Dispute Settlement. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Bown, Chad P. (2010) “The WTO Secretariat and the Role of Economics in Panels and Arbitrations,” in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010): 391–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bown, Chad P. and Hoekman, Bernard M. (2005) “WTO Dispute Settlement and the Missing Developing Country Cases: Engaging the Private Sector,” Journal of International Economic Law v 8, n 4 (December): 861–890.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coppens, Dominic. WTO Disciplines on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures – Balancing Policy Space and Legal Constraints, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davey, William J. and Sapir, André (2010). “United States – Subsidies on Upland Cotton Recourse to Article 21.5 by Brazil, WT/DS267/AB/RW (2 June 2008),” World Trade Review, 9 (special issue), pp. 181–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, Gene M. and Sykes, Alan O. (2011) “‘Optimal’ Retaliation in the WTO – A Commentary on the Upland Cotton Arbitration,” 10 World Trade Review 133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pauwelyn, Joost (2012) “The Use, Nonuse and Abuse of Economics in WTO and Investor State Dispute Settlement,” Draft paper, 30 August 2012, ssrn.com/abstract=2141357.Google Scholar
Sapir, André and Trachtman, Joel (2008) “Subsidization, Price Suppression, and Expertise: Causation and Precision in Upland Cotton (with André Sapir),” 7 (Special Issue 1) World Trade Review 183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schropp, Simon (2009a), Trade Policy Flexibility and Enforcement in the WTO: A Law and Economics Analysis, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schropp, Simon (2009b), “The Equivalence Standard Under Article 22.4 DSU: A ‘Tariffic’ Misunderstanding?,” forthcoming in Bown, Chad P. and Pauwelyn, Joost (eds.), The Law, Economics and Politics of Retaliation in WTO Dispute Settlement, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar
WTO (2005). “World Trade Report: Trade, Standards and the WTO,” Geneva: World Trade Organization.Google Scholar
- 1
- Cited by