Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-768dbb666b-9qwsl Total loading time: 1.064 Render date: 2023-02-02T22:37:50.539Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

1 - Introduction to Selection and Assessment

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 June 2021

Adrian Furnham
Affiliation:
University of London
Get access

Summary

This chapter looks at the background to the whole issue of when, why and how people go about selecting applicants in the workplace. It is at the heart of industrial, organisational, vocational and work psychology. The chapter suggests that there are essentially five ways to assess people in the workplace: what they say about themselves; what others say about them; their behaviour on tests or in particular situations; physical and physiological evidence and their life history The chapter considers, in detail, many attempts over the years to compare and contrast different methods of assessment based on a number of criteria, particularly reliability and validity, but also cost, legal constraints and acceptability to the candidate. The chapter also looks at the research from a practitioner perspective, namely the current practice of assessment and their beliefs about various test methods. The final section looks at changes and developments in the academic and business world with respect to assessing people.

Type
Chapter
Information
Twenty Ways to Assess Personnel
Different Techniques and their Respective Advantages
, pp. 1 - 44
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderson, N., & Cunningham‐Snell, N. (2000) Personnel selection. In Chmiel, N. (Ed.), Introduction to work and organizational psychology (p. 6999). Blackwell.Google Scholar
Arnold, J., Silvester, J., Cooper, C. L., Robertson, I. T., & Patterson, F. M. (2005). Work psychology: Understanding human behaviour in the workplace. Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Chatman, J. A., Wong, E., & Joyce, C. (2008). When do people make the place? In The people make the place (p. 6386). New York: LEA.Google Scholar
Cook, M. (2004). Personnel selection. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cook, M. (2016). Personnel selection: Adding value through people-A changing picture. John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Ferguson, E., & Lievens, F. (2017). Future directions in personality, occupational and medical selection: myths, misunderstandings, measurement, and suggestions. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 22(2), 387399.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A. (2008). HR professionals’ beliefs about, and knowledge of, assessment techniques and psychometric tests. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 16(3), 300305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A. (2018). The great divide: Academic versus practitioner criteria for psychometric test choice. Journal of Personality Assessment, 100(5), 498506.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furnham, A., & Jackson, C. J. (2011). Practitioner reactions to work‐related psychological tests. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 26, 549565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furnham, A., Trickey, G., & Hyde, G. (2012). Bright aspects to dark side traits: Dark side traits associated with work success. Personality and Individual Differences, 52(8), 908913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gatewood, R., Feild, H. S., & Barrick, M. (2015). Human resource selection. Nelson Education.Google Scholar
Greiff, S., & Iliescu, D. (2017). A test is much more than just the test itself. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(3), 145148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ihsan, Z., & Furnham, A. (2018). The new technologies in personality assessment: A review. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 70(2), 147167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lundgren, H., Poell, R. F., & Kroon, B. (2019). “This is not a test”: How do human resource development professionals use personality tests as tools of their professional practice? Human Resource Development Quarterly, 30(2), 175196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Piotrowski, C. (2019). Current research emphasis in the field of psychological assessment: A panorama of investigatory domain. North American Journal of Psychology, 21(3), 583599.Google Scholar
Pulakos, E. D. (2005). Selection assessment methods. Society for Human Resource Management (SHRM) Foundation.Google Scholar
Rotolo, C. T., & Church, A. H. (2015). Big data recommendations for industrial–organizational psychology: Are we in whoville?. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 8(4), 515520.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ryan, A. M., Inceoglu, I., Bartram, D., Golubovich, J., Grand, J., Reeder, M., Derous, E., Nikolaou, l., & Yao, X. (2015). Trends in testing: Highlights of a global survey. In Nikolaou, I. & Oostrom, J. K. (Eds.), Current issues in work and organizational psychology. Employee recruitment, selection, and assessment: Contemporary issues for theory and practice (p. 136153). Routledge/Taylor & Francis GroupGoogle Scholar
Schaubroeck, J., Ganster, D., & Jones, J. (1998). Organization and occupation influences in the Attraction‐Selection‐Attrition process. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83, 869891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1989). Fairness in employment selection. Advances in Selection and Assessment, 10, 134153.Google Scholar
Schmidt, F. L., Oh, I. S., & Shaffer, J. A. (2016). The validity and utility of selection methods in personnel psychology: Practical and theoretical implications of 100 years… Fox School of Business Research Paper.Google Scholar
Schneider, B. (1987). The people make the place. Personnel Psychology, 40(3), 437453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, B., Smith, D. B., Taylor, S., & Fleenor, J. (1998). Personality and organizations: A test of the homogeneity of personality hypothesis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 83(3), 462.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sehlapelo, M., & Terre Blanche, M. (1996). Psychometric testing in South Africa: Views from above and below. Psychology in Society, 21(49), 45.Google Scholar
Sosnowska, J., Hofmans, J., & Lievens, F. (2018). Assessing personality dynamics in personnel selection. In Rauthmann, J. F (Ed.), The handbook of personality dynamics and processes (p. 6187). Elsevier.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×