Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5d59c44645-ndqjc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-02-26T05:42:12.965Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - The making of a comprehensive transnational discourse community trade unions as a defensive transnational community, 1968–1988

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

Marie-Laure Djelic
Affiliation:
ESSEC Business School, France
Sigrid Quack
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute, Cologne
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The critique of state-centered approaches to international relations and international political economy has resulted in a rapidly growing literature focusing on a variety of “private authorities” in international relations (Cutler et al. 1999). In this literature, arrays of transnational communities are prominent subjects of analysis. Epistemic communities promoting new environmental standards, discourse communities pushing for new public management across borders, and advocacy coalitions shaming the perpetrators of human rights abuses, for example, have been observed and conceptualized in order to shed light on the extent to which dispersed actors from diverse locations can build and maintain crucial links, and develop social identities across borders. In turn, these have been found important for setting political agendas, acquiring a voice in policy implementation processes, policing compliance, and spreading ideologies more generally (Haas 1992a; Keck and Sikkink 1998; Bislev et al. 2002; Djelic 2006). At the same time, it is becoming clear that many of these transnational communities recruit their members among private as well as public constituencies. A study of these communities thus also needs specifically to address the linkages between civil society, business, and the public sphere.

Transnational community research has also contributed to the rise of social constructivist approaches in international relations (Risse 2007). However, given the increasing attention paid to knowledge, ideas, and discourse, it is surprising how little international relations scholarship in general, and transnational community research in particular, have had to say so far about the global rise of neoliberal discourse.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Communities
Shaping Global Economic Governance
, pp. 305 - 326
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E. 2005. Communitarian international relations. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Adler, E. and Barnett, M. (eds.) 1998. Security communities. Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Bislev, S., Salskov-Iversen, D. and Krause Hansen, H. 2002. “The global diffusion of managerialism: Transnational discourse communities at work,” Global Society 16 (2): 199–212.CrossRef
Cockett, R. 1994. Thinking the unthinkable: Think-tanks and the economic counter-revolution 1931–1983. London: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. C., Haufler, V. and Porter, T. (eds.) 1999. Private authority and international affairs. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
,CWL (Colloque Walter Lippmann) 1939. Compte-rendu des séances du Colloque Walter Lippmann. 26–30 aout, Paris (=Travaux du Centre International d'Études pour la Rénovation du Libéralisme. Cahier 1).
Denord, F. 2001. “Aux origines du neo-liberalism en France,” Le Mouvement Social 195: 9–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, K. 1957. Political community and the North Atlantic area. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Dezalay, Y. and Garth, B. G. 2002. The internationalization of palace wars. University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djelic, M.-L. 2006. “Marketization: From intellectual agenda to global policy making,” in Djelic, M.-L. and Sahlin-Andersson, K. (eds.), Transnational governance. Cambridge University Press, pp. 53–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Drake, W. J. and Nicolaïdis, K. 1992. “Ideas, interests, and institutionalization: Trade in services and the Uruguay Round,” International Organization 46 (1): 37–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feichtinger, J. 2001. Wissenschaft zwischen den Kulturen. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus.Google Scholar
Feulner, E. 2000. “The Heritage Foundation,” in McGann, J. G. and Weaver, R. K. (eds.), Think tanks and civil societies. Catalysts for ideas and action. London: Transaction, pp. 67–85.Google Scholar
Fischer, F. 2003. Reframing public policy: Discursive politics and deliberative practices. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, F. and Forrester, J. (eds.) 1993. The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRef
Foucault, M. 2004. Geschichte der Gouvernementalität II. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp Verlag.Google Scholar
Frost, G. 2002. Antony Fisher: Champion of liberty. London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
Gandil, C. 1986. Comment on R. M. Hartwell: The history of the Mont Pèlerin Society. Ghent: Liberaal Archief.Google Scholar
Goodman, J. C., and Marotz-Baden, R. (eds.) 1990. Fighting the war of ideas in Latin America. Dallas: National Center for Policy Analysis.
Haas, P. M. 1992a. “Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone,” International Organization 46 (1): 187–224.
Haas, P. M. 1992b. “Introduction: epistemic communities and international policy coordination,” International Organization, 46 (1): 1–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajer, M. A. 1993. “Discourse coalitions and the institutionalization of practice: The case of acid rain in Britain,” in Fischer, and Forrester, (eds.), The argumentative turn in policy analysis and planning. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, pp. 43–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, P. (ed.) 1989. The political power of economic ideas: Keynesianism across nations. Princeton University Press.
Hartwell, R. M. 1995. A history of the Mont Pèlerin Society. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund.Google Scholar
Harvey, D. 2005. A brief history of neoliberalism. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hayek, F. 1967. Studies in philosophy, politics and economics. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. 1989. “How the Keynesian Revolution was exported from the United States, and other comments,” in Hall, P. A. (ed.), pp. 347–59.
Horn, L. 2009. “Organic intellectuals at work? The high level group of company law experts in European corporate governance regulation,” in Apeldoorn, B. v., Drahokoupil, J. and Horn, L. (eds.), Contradictions and limits of neoliberal European governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 125–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joas, H. 1999. Die Entstehung der Werte. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Keck, M. and Sikkink, K. 1998. Activists beyond borders. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Levi-Faur, D. 2005. “The global diffusion of regulatory capitalism,” The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 598 (1): 12–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lippmann, W. 1937. An inquiry into the principles of the good society. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.) 2009. The road from Mont Pèlerin. The making of the neoliberal thought collective. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRef
Mitchell, T. 2009. “The work of economics: How neoliberalism makes its world,” in Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.).
Nash, G. 1998 [1976]. The conservative intellectual movement in America since 1945. Wilmington, DE: ISI.Google Scholar
Nordmann, J. 2005. Der lange Marsch zum Neoliberalismus. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
Plehwe, D. 2000. Deregulierung und transnationale Integration der Transportwirtschaft in Nordamerika. Münster: Westfälisches Dampfboot.Google Scholar
Plehwe, D. 2008. “Im Schatten von Hayek und Friedman: Die Vielflieger im Kreise der Mont Pèlerin Society,” in Unfried, B., Mittag, J. and Linden, M. v. d. (eds.), Transnationale Netzwerke im 20. Jahrhundert. Leipzig: Akademische Verlagsanstalt, pp. 235–64.Google Scholar
Plehwe, D. 2009a. “Introduction,” in Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.).
Plehwe, D. 2009b. “Origins of the neoliberal development discourse,” in Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.).
Plehwe, D. and Walpen, B. 2006. “Between network and complex organization: The making of neoliberal knowledge and hegemony,” in Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. and Neunhöffer, G. (eds.), pp. 27–50.
Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. and Neunhöffer, G. (eds.) 2006. Neoliberal hegemony: A global critique. London: Routledge.
Ptak, R. 2004. Vom Ordoliberalismus zur Sozialen Marktwirtschaft. Opladen: Leske und Budrich.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ptak, R. 2009. “Ordoliberal origins and stages of Neoliberalism in Germany: Revisiting the ‘Social Market Economy’,” in Mirowski, P. and Plehwe, D. (eds.).
Risse, T. 2007. “Social constructivism meets globalization,” in Held, D. and McGrew, A. (eds.), Globalization theory. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 126–47.Google Scholar
Rochon, T. R. 1998. Culture moves: Ideas, activism, and changing values. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Schöller, O. and Groh, O. 2006. “The education of neoliberalism,” in Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. and Neunhöffer, G. (eds.), pp. 171–87.
Steiner, Y. 2007. “Les riches amis suisses du néolibéralisme. De la débâcle de la revue Occident à la Conférence du Mont Pèlerin d'avril 1947,” Traverse: Zeitschrift für Geschichte/Revue d'histoire 1: 114–26.Google Scholar
Stone, D. 1996. Capturing the political imagination. London: Frank Cass.Google Scholar
Süddeutsche, Zeitung. 2008. ‘Kapitalismus in der Krise, Erinnerungen an alten Glanz’ by Gerd Zitzelsberger, 24 November.
,Union of Concerned Scientists. 2007. Smoke, mirrors and hot air: How ExxonMobil uses Big Tobacco's tactics to manufacture uncertainty on climate science. Cambridge, MA: Union of Concerned Scientists.Google Scholar
Walpen, B. 2000. “Von Hasen und Igeln oder: Ein Blick auf den Neoliberalismus,” Utopie kreativ 121/122: 1066–79.Google Scholar
Walpen, B. 2004. Die offenen Feinde und ihre Gesellschaft. Hamburg: VSA.Google Scholar
Weller, C. and Singleton, L. 2006, “Peddling reform: The role of think tanks in shaping the neoliberal policy agenda for the World Bank and International Monetary Fund,” in Plehwe, D., Walpen, B. and Neunhöffer, G. (eds.), pp. 70–86.
Yergin, D. and Stanislaw, J. 1998. The commanding heights. New York City: Touchstone.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×