Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-8zxtt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-11T20:23:46.757Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

2 - Global structures: markets, organizations, networks – and communities?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 September 2010

By
Renate Mayntz
Edited by
Marie-Laure Djelic  and
Sigrid Quack
Marie-Laure Djelic
Affiliation:
ESSEC Business School, France
Sigrid Quack
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute, Cologne
Get access

Summary

Community and globalization: diverging perspectives

In discussions of globalization, in which the evolving structures that transcend the boundaries of nation-states are the focus, markets, organizations, and networks predominate. Economic globalization takes place through the (potentially) worldwide expansion of markets and the growth of transnational corporations (TNC), facilitated by the international expansion of communication and transportation networks. Political globalization – that is, global governance – involves the multiplication of international governmental and non-governmental organizations. The existence of global production networks and global public policy networks completes the inventory of social forms with transnational territorial scope. Transnational communities do not play a significant role in the discussion on global structures. In the International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, the term “global community” does appear (for example, on page 2383), but there is no specific entry. It seems that the theoretical approaches that dominate the study of globalization direct attention selectively to markets, organizations, and networks, neglecting other kinds of social collectives extending beyond national boundaries, such as communities. This does not mean that the phenomenon is not being observed, as the chapters in this book also demonstrate. The role of legal professionals in transnational law-making has been studied (Quack 2007), scientific communities of varying geographical expansion are studied in the sociology of science, transnational communities of discourse are a topic in cultural studies (see Plehwe in this volume), and relevant contributions can also be found in research on migration.

Type
Chapter
Information
Transnational Communities
Shaping Global Economic Governance
 , pp. 37 - 54
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adler, E. 1992. “The emergence of cooperation: National epistemic communities and the international evolution of the idea of nuclear arms control,” International Organization 46 (1): 101–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartley, T. 2003. “Certifying forests and factories: States, social movements, and the rise of private regulation in the apparel and forest product field,” Politics & Society 31: 433–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckler, S. 2007. “Theory, ideology, rhetoric: Ideas in politics and the case of ‘community’ in recent political discourse,” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 9 (1): 36–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C. 2005. Capitalist diversity and change: Recombinant governance and institutional entrepreneurs. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, P. J. 1997. “Beyond policy community: French agriculture and the GATT,” Journal of European Public Policy 4 (3): 355–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etzioni, A. 1993. The spirit of community: Rights, responsibilities, and the communitarian agenda. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Etzioni, A. (ed.) 1995. New communitarian thinking: Persons, virtues, institutions, and communities. Charlottesville, VA: University Press of Virginia.
Fuchs, D. 2005. Understanding business power in global governance. Baden-Baden: Nomos.Google Scholar
Geiger, T. 1960. Die Gesellschaft zwischen Pathos und Nüchternheit. Copenhagen: Universitetsforlaget.Google Scholar
Gläser, J. 2006. Wissenschaftliche Produktionsgemeinschaften: Die soziale Ordnung der Forschung. Frankfurt a.M: Campus.Google Scholar
Haas, P. M. 1992a. “Banning chlorofluorocarbons: Epistemic community efforts to protect stratospheric ozone,” International Organization 46 (1): 187–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P. M. 1992b. “Introduction: Epistemic communities and international policy coordination,” International Organization 46 (1): 1–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillery, G. A. 1955. “Definitions of community: Areas of agreement,” Rural Sociology 20: 111–23.Google Scholar
Jessop, B. and Ngai-Ling, S. 2006. Beyond the regulation approach: Putting capitalist economies in their place. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jordan, G. 1990. “Sub-governments, policy communities and networks. Filling the old bottles?,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 319–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kessler, J. 2007. Globalisierung oder Integration: Korrespondenzprobleme bei der empirischen Erfassung von Globalisierunsprozessen. Bremen: TransState Working Papers No.53.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. 1999. Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Knorr Cetina, K. 2005. “How are global markets global? The architecture of the flow world,” in Knorr Cetina, K. and Preda, A. (eds.), The sociology of financial markets. Oxford University Press, pp. 38–61.Google Scholar
Kogut, B. and Metiu, A. 2001. “Open source software development and distributed innovation,” Oxford Review of Economic Policy 17 (2): 248–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayntz, R. 2001. “Die Bestimmung von Forschungsthemen in Max-Planck-Instituten im Spannungsfeld wissenschaftlicher und außerwissenschaftlicher Interessen: Ein Forschungsbericht.” MPIfG Discussion Paper 01/8. Cologne: Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R. 2003. “New challenges to governance theory,” in Bang, H. P. (ed.), Governance as social and political communication. Manchester University Press, pp. 27–40.Google Scholar
Quack, S. 2007. “Legal professionals and transnational law-making: A case of distributed agency,” Organization 14 (5): 643–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rhodes, R. A. W. 1990. “Policy networks. A British perspective,” Journal of Theoretical Politics 2 (3): 293–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice: Learning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wenger, E. 2001. “Communities of practice,” in International Encyclopedia of the Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 4. Amsterdam: Elsevier, pp. 2339–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wiesenthal, H. 2000. “Markt, Organisation und Gemeinschaft als ‘zweitbeste’ Verfahren sozialer Koordination,” in Werle, R. and Schimank, U. (eds.), Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus, pp. 44–73.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×