Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76dd75c94c-68sx7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-30T09:38:06.478Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Twenty-Two - Perspective

consequences of trait-mediated indirect interactions for biological control of plant pests

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Maurice W. Sabelis
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
Arne Janssen
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
Izabela Lesna
Affiliation:
Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
Takayuki Ohgushi
Affiliation:
Kyoto University, Japan
Oswald Schmitz
Affiliation:
Yale University, Connecticut
Robert D. Holt
Affiliation:
University of Florida
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Biological control of plant pests involves the use of natural enemies to control arthropods that in turn are enemies of the plant. Classic theory on biocontrol focused on density-dependent interactions between natural enemies and plant pests (Hassell 1978), but largely ignored a role for the plant other than directly affecting the growth rate of the plant pest (i.e., resulting from nutritional quality and direct anti-herbivore defence of the plant). That the plant’s role goes far beyond setting the growth rate of the herbivore was realized much later. Prompted by a seminal review by Price et al. (1980), an avalanche of research now shows the multifarious ways in which plants influence the effectiveness of natural enemies against plant pests and the vulnerability of these pest organisms to their enemies. Such effects on the herbivore’s predators may arise from constitutive investment by the plant, or from versatile investments induced by herbivory. Thus, herbivore-induced changes in the state of the plant may directly and indirectly, i.e., via predators, affect herbivores (Dicke and Sabelis 1988; Turlings et al. 1995; Karban and Baldwin 1997). To the best of our knowledge, predators do not change the state of plants, but they can induce changes in behaviour and life history of herbivores, thereby indirectly affecting the plant (Schmitz et al. 2004). Moreover, herbivorous arthropods may foresee predation risk and avoid predator-occupied plants in response to chemical alarm from herbivores under attack (Janssen et al. 1998; Pallini et al. 1999; Nomikou et al. 2003; Lee et al. 2011). Taken together, tritrophic systems of arthropods on plants are replete with trait changes induced by organisms at adjacent trophic levels and with effects cascading across all trophic levels. Such indirect effects become ever more complex in multispecies food webs because they arise whenever there are more than two species (Werner and Peacor 2003). One example is competition between plant pest species, which not only directly compete for food or by interference, but may also compete indirectly via the plant’s defence response and via responses of shared and non-shared predators.

Type
Chapter
Information
Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
Ecological and Evolutionary Perspectives
, pp. 435 - 449
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aratchige, N. S. 2007
Aratchige, N. S.Lesna, I.Sabelis, M. W. 2004 Belowground plant parts emit herbivore-induced volatiles: olfactory responses of a predatory mite to tulip bulbs infested by rust mitesExperimental and Applied Acarology 33 21CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aratchige, N. S.Sabelis, M. W.Lesna, I. 2007 Plant structural changes due to herbivory: do changes in -infested coconut fruits allow predatory mites to move under the perianthExperimental and Applied Acarology 43 97CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bakker, F. M.Sabelis, M. W. 1989 How larvae of reduce the attack success of phytoseiid predatorsEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 50 47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boubou, A.Migeon, A.Roderick, G. K.Navajas, M. 2011 Recent emergence and worldwide spread of the red tomato spider mite, : genetic variation and multiple cryptic invasionsBiological Invasions 13 81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzivasileiadis, E. A.Boon, J. J.Sabelis, M. W. 1999 Accumulation and turnover of 2-tridecanone in Koch and its consequences for resistance of wild and cultivated tomatoesExperimental and Applied Acarology 23 1011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chatzivasileiadis, E. A.Egas, M.Sabelis, M. W. 2001 Resistance to 2-tridecanone in Koch: effects of induced resistance, cross-resistance and heritabilityExperimental and Applied Acarology 25 717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dicke, M.Sabelis, M. W. 1988 How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguardsNetherlands Journal of Zoology 38 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fievet, V.Lhomme, P.Outreman, Y. 2008 Predation risk cues associated with killed conspecifics affect the behavior and reproduction of prey animalsOikos 117 1380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Furtado, I. P.de Moraes, G. J.Kreiter, S.Tixier, M.-S.Knapp, M. 2007 Potential of a Brazilian population of the predatory mite as a biological control agent of (Acari: Phytoseiidae, Tetranychidae)Biological Control 42 139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruys, P. 1982 Hits and misses: the ecological approach to pest controlEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 31 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruys, P. 1986 Ontwikkeling van de fruitspintmijt en roofmijt op de Schuilenburg, 1965–1980Intern Report S288, Praktijkonderzoek Plant en Omgeving (PPO-WUR)FruitteeltpraktijkcentrumRandwijk, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
Hanna, R.Onzo, A.Lingeman, R.Yaninek, J. S.Sabelis, M. W. 2005 Seasonal cycles and persistence in an acarine predator–prey system on cassava in AfricaPopulation Ecology 47 107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassell, M. P. 1978 The Dynamics of Arthropod Predator–Prey SystemsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hassell, M. P. 2000 The Spatial and Temporal Dynamics of Host–Parasitoid InteractionsOxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Helle, W.Sabelis, M. W. 1985 Spider Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pests 1 Amsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Holt, R. D.Hochberg, M. E. 2001 Indirect interactions, community modules and biological control: a theoretical perspectiveWaijnberg, E.Scott, J. K.Quimby, P. C.Evaluation of Indirect Ecological Effects of Biological ControlWallingford, UKCABI Publishing13Google Scholar
Janssen, A.Pallini, A.Venzon, M.Sabelis, M. W. 1998 Behaviour and food web interactions among plant inhabiting mites and thripsExperimental and Applied Acarology 22 497CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, M. R.Ament, K.Sabelis, M. W.Haring, M. A.Schuurink, R. C. 2004 Differential timing of spider mite-induced direct and indirect defenses in tomato plantsPlant Physiology 135 483CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karban, R.Baldwin, I. 1997 Induced Responses to HerbivoryChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, A.Veenendaal, R. L.Bruin, J.Egas, M.Sabelis, M. W. 2004 Predation risk affects diapause induction in the spider mite Experimental and Applied Acarology 34 307CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kroon, A.Veenendaal, R. L.Bruin, J.Egas, M.Sabelis, M. W. 2008 Sleeping with the enemy: predator-induced diapause in a miteNaturwissenschaften 95 1195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kroon, A.Veenendaal, R. L.Egas, M.Bruin, J.Sabelis, M. W. 2005 Diapause incidence in the two-spotted spider mite increases due to predator presence, not due to selective predationExperimental and Applied Acarology 35 73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, D.-H.Nyrop, J. P.Sanderson, J. P. 2011 Avoidance of natural enemies by adult whiteflies, , and effects on host plant choiceBiological Control 58 302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesna, I.Conijn, C. G. M.Sabelis, M. W. 2005 From biological control to biological insight: rust-mite induced change in bulb morphology, a new mode of indirect plant defenceWeigmann, G.Alberti, G.Wohltmann, A.Ragusa, S.Acarine Biodiversity in the Natural and Human Sphere. Phytophaga 14 285Google Scholar
Lindquist, E. E.Sabelis, M. W.Bruin, J. 1996 Eriophyoid Mites: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pest Series 6 Amsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Magalhães, S.Janssen, A.Hanna, R.Sabelis, M. W. 2002 Flexible antipredator behaviour in herbivorous mites through vertical migration in a plantOecologia 132 143CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNair, J. N. 1986 The effects of refuges on predator–prey interactions: a reconsiderationTheoretical Population Biology 29 38CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNair, J. N. 1987 Stability effects of prey refuges with entry–exit dynamicsJournal of Theoretical Biology 125 449CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murdoch, W. W.Briggs, C. J.Nisbet, R. M. 2003 Consumer–Resource DynamicsPrinceton, NJPrinceton University PressGoogle Scholar
Negloh, K.Hanna, R.Schausberger, P. 2010 Season- and fruit age-dependent population dynamics of and its associated predatory mite on coconut in BeninBiological Control 54 349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nomikou, M.Janssen, A.Sabelis, M. W. 2003 Herbivore host plant selection: whitefly learns to avoid host plants that are unsafe for her offspringOecologia 136 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meng, R.-X.Janssen, A.Nomikou, M.Zhang, Q.-W.Sabelis, M. W. 2006 Previous and present diets of mite predators affect antipredator behaviour of whitefly preyExperimental and Applied Acarology 38 113CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Onzo, A.Hanna, R.Zannou, I.Sabelis, M. W.Yaninek, J. S. 2003 Dynamics of refuge use: diurnal, vertical migration by predatory and herbivorous mites within cassava plantsOikos 101 59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Onzo, A.Sabelis, M. W.Hanna, R. 2010 Effects of ultraviolet radiation on predatory mites and the role of refuges in plant structuresEnvironmental Entomology 39 695CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pallini, A.Janssen, A.Sabelis, M. W. 1998 Predators induce interspecific herbivore competition for food in refuge spaceEcology Letters 1 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallini, A.Janssen, A.Sabelis, M. W. 1999 Spider mites avoid plants with predatorsExperimental and Applied Ecology 23 803Google Scholar
Price, P. W.Bouton, C. E.Gross, P. 1980 Interactions among three trophic levels: influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemiesAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 11 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rabbinge, R. 1976 Biological control of the European red mite Simulation MonographsWageningen, The NetherlandsPUDOCGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M. W. 1992 Arthropod predatorsCrawley, M. J.Natural Enemies: The Population Biology of Predators, Parasites and DiseasesOxfordBlackwell225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M. W. 1996 Phytoseiidae: Their Biology, Natural Enemies and Control. World Crop Pest Series 6 Amsterdam, The NetherlandsElsevier Science PublishersGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M. W.Bakker, F. M. 1992 How predatory mites cope with the web of their tetranychid prey: a functional view on dorsal chaetotaxy in the PhytoseiidaeExperimental and Applied Acarology 16 203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabelis, M. W.Takabayashi, J.Janssen, A. 2007 Ecology meets plant physiology: herbivore-induced plant responses and their indirect effects on arthropod communitiesOhgushi, T.Craig, T. P.Price, P. W.Ecological Communities: Plant Mediation in Indirect Interaction WebsCambridgeCambridge University Press188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarmento, R. A.Lemos, F.Bleeker, P. M. 2011 A herbivore that manipulates plant defenceEcology Letters 14 229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sarmento, R. A.Lemos, F.Dias, C. R. 2011 A herbivorous mite down-regulates plant defence and produces web to exclude competitorsPLoS ONE 6 e23757CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schmitz, O. J.Krivan, V.Ovadia, O. 2004 Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactionsEcology Letters 7 153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schierenbeck, K. A.Lee, C. E.Holt, R. D. 2010 Synthesizing ecology and evolution for the study of invasive speciesEvolutionary Applications 3 96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turlings, T. C. J.Loughrin, J. H.McCall, P. J. 1995 How caterpillar-damaged plants protect themselves by attracting parasitic waspsProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 92 4169CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Haren, R. J. F.Steenhuis, M. M.Sabelis, M. W.de Ponti, O. M. B. 1987 Tomato stem trichomes and dispersal success of relative to its prey Experimental and Applied Acarology 3 115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisser, W. W.Braendle, C.Minoretti, N. 1999 Predator-induced morphological shift in the pea aphidProceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 266 1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Werner, E. E.Peacor, S. D. 2003 A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communitiesEcology 84 1083CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaninek, J. S. 1988 Continental dispersal of the cassava green mite, an exotic pest in Africa, and implications for biological controlExperimental and Applied Acarology 4 211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yaninek, J. S.Hanna, R. 2003 Cassava green mite in Africa: a unique example of successful classical biological control of a mite pest on a continental scaleNeuenschwander, P.Borgemeister, C.Langewald, L.Biological Control in IPM Systems in AfricaWallingford, UKCABI Publishing61Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Perspective
    • By Maurice W. Sabelis, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Arne Janssen, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Izabela Lesna, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
  • Edited by Takayuki Ohgushi, Kyoto University, Japan, Oswald Schmitz, Yale University, Connecticut, Robert D. Holt, University of Florida
  • Book: Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736551.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Perspective
    • By Maurice W. Sabelis, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Arne Janssen, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Izabela Lesna, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
  • Edited by Takayuki Ohgushi, Kyoto University, Japan, Oswald Schmitz, Yale University, Connecticut, Robert D. Holt, University of Florida
  • Book: Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736551.028
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Perspective
    • By Maurice W. Sabelis, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Arne Janssen, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam, Izabela Lesna, Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics, University of Amsterdam
  • Edited by Takayuki Ohgushi, Kyoto University, Japan, Oswald Schmitz, Yale University, Connecticut, Robert D. Holt, University of Florida
  • Book: Trait-Mediated Indirect Interactions
  • Online publication: 05 February 2013
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511736551.028
Available formats
×