Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-5c6d5d7d68-wpx84 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-08-10T01:16:21.790Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Introduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 November 2020

Get access

Summary

Abstract

The idea of an outside of the film is based on the assumption that an absent cause is structurally immanent to film. In a film, the absent cause coincides with the camera’s gaze, which remains external to the image precisely as the generator of the cinematic image. This is the paradox of the cinema: the camera can never reveal itself as the cause of the image, the generative outside cannot be transferred to the inside of the image. With apparatus theory, however, this necessary split between gaze and image, cause and effect, production process and product, becomes the cardinal ideological problem of a political film aesthetics. How can cinema produce political effects when its the structure of its dispositif works towards concealing its productive outside?

Keywords: Absence, Apparatus, Camera, Ideology, Off-Screen

“To understand this necessary and paradoxical identity of non-vision and vision within vision itself is very exactly to pose our problems (the problem of the necessary connection which unites the visible and the invisible).”

– Louis Althusser

“…which would mean that the effects are successful only in the absence of cause.”

– Jacques Lacan

If, in almost all advanced discourses of film theory, it is a commonly held position that the media self-reflexivity of an aesthetic object is virtually synonymous with an explicit political reflexivity, then it should be recalled, in line with Louis Althusser and Jacques Lacan, that even the most refined reflexive turn is always, in the end, condemned to failure when it comes up against the hard kernel of an “absent cause.” An apparently simple structural phenomenon, which can be described as a fundamental impossibility of every self-reflexivity, forms the point of departure for the following discussion on the complex theoretical history of the twin, inextricably intertwined concepts of enunciation and suture: the film camera cannot film itself in the process of filming. The original site of capturing the image in every cinematic shot appears as a blind spot. The entity that gives rise to the visible world remains necessarily external to it. The plenitude of the visible is thus based on the existence of an invisible site, the Inside on an Outside, the on-screen world on the off-screen world, the effect on an absent cause.

Type
Chapter
Information
Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema
The Outside of Film
, pp. 13 - 24
Publisher: Amsterdam University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Introduction
  • Sulgi Lie
  • Translated by Daniel Fairfax
  • Book: Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema
  • Online publication: 21 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048533985.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Introduction
  • Sulgi Lie
  • Translated by Daniel Fairfax
  • Book: Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema
  • Online publication: 21 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048533985.003
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Introduction
  • Sulgi Lie
  • Translated by Daniel Fairfax
  • Book: Towards a Political Aesthetics of Cinema
  • Online publication: 21 November 2020
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9789048533985.003
Available formats
×