Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-n7x5d Total loading time: 0.489 Render date: 2021-12-05T21:44:14.690Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - The Conforming Brain and Deontological Resolve

from Part I - Structure and Mechanics of the Brain

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Philip M. Nichols
University of Pennsylvania
Diana C. Robertson
University of Pennsylvania
Get access


Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Thinking about Bribery
Neuroscience, Moral Cognition and the Psychology of Bribery
, pp. 33 - 66
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Atran, S. (2010). A question of honour: Why the Taliban fight and what to do about it. Asian Journal of Social Sciences, 38, 343363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Babad, E., Ariav, A., Rosen, I., & Salomon, G. (1987). Perseverance of bias as a function of debriefing conditions and subjects’ confidence. Social Behaviour, 2(3), 185193.Google Scholar
Badre, D., Poldrack, R. A., Pare´-Blagoev, E. J., Insler, R. Z., & Wagner, A. D. (2005). Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. Neuron, 47(6), 907918.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baron, J., & Spranca, M. (1997). Protected values. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bartels, D. M. (2008). Principled moral sentiment and the flexibility of moral judgment and decision making. Cognition, 108(2), 381417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bassili, J. N. (1996). Meta-judgmental versus operative indexes of psychological attributes: The case of measures of attitude strength. Journal of Personalty and Social Psychology, 71, 637653.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. M., DeGroot, M. H., & Marschak, J. (1964). Measuring utility by a single-response sequential method. Behavioral Sciences, 9(3), 226232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Berns, G. S., Bell, E., Capra, C. M., et al. (2012). The price of your soul: Neural evidence for the non-utilitarian representation of sacred values. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 367(1589), 754762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhanji, J. P., Beer, J. S., & Bunge, S. A. (2010). Taking a gamble or playing by the rules: Dissociable prefrontal systems implicated in probabilistic versus deterministic rule-based decisions. NeuroImage, 49(2), 18101819.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., Ruge, H., Meiran, N., et al. (2003). When the same response has different meanings: Recoding the response meaning in the lateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 20(2), 10261031.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brass, M., & Von Cramon, D. Y. (2004). Decomposing components of task preparation with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(4), 609620.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, S. A. (2004). How we use rules to select actions: A review of evidence from cognitive neuroscience. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 4(4), 564579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bunge, S. A., Kahn, I., Wallis, J. D., Miller, E. K., & Wagner, A. D. (2003). Neural circuits subserving the retrieval and maintenance of abstract rules. Journal of Neurophysiology, 90(5), 34193428.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donohue, S. E., Wendelken, C., Crone, E. A., & Bunge, S. A. (2005). Retrieving rules for behavior from long-term memory. NeuroImage, 26(4), 11401149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Drake, R. A. (1993). Processing persuasive arguments – II: Discounting of truth and relevance as a function of agreement and manipulated activation asymmetry. Journal of Research in Personality, 27, 184196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falk, E. B., Way, B. M., & Jasinska, A. J. (2012). An imaging genetics approach to understanding social influence. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6, 168.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gazzaniga, M. S. (1998, June 16). The split brain revisited. Scientific American. Last accessed November 1, 2013.
Ginges, J., Atran, S., Sachdeva, S., & Medin, D. (2011). Psychology out of the laboratory: The challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist, 66(6), 507.Google Scholar
Izuma, K., & Adolphs, R. (2013). Social manipulation of preference in the human brain. Neuron, 78(3), 563573.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klucharev, V., Hytönen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernández, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signal predicts social conformity. Neuron, 61(1), 140151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lombrozo, T. (2009). The role of moral commitments in moral judgment. Cognitive Science, 33(2), 273286.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramachandran, V. S. (1995). Anosognosia in parietal lobe syndrome. Conscious and Cognition, 4(1), 2251.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sharot, T., Kanai, R., Marston, D., et al. (2012). Selectively altering belief formation in the human brain. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109(42), 1705817062.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souza, M. J., Donohue, S. E., & Bunge, S. A. (2009). Controlled retrieval and selection of action-relevant knowledge mediated by partially overlapping regions in left ventrolateral prefrontal cortex. NeuroImage, 46(1), 299307.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tetlock, P. E. (2003). Thinking the unthinkable: Sacred values and taboo cognitions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(7), 320324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 2436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 12981313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats