Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-5db6c4db9b-qvlvc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2023-03-25T06:02:03.646Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "useRatesEcommerce": false } hasContentIssue true

6 - On the Extent, Growth, and Efficiency Consequences of State Business Tax Planning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2009

Donald Bruce
University of Tennessee
John Deskins
Creighton University
William F. Fox
University of Tennessee
Alan J. Auerbach
University of California, Berkeley
James R. Hines, Jr.
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Joel Slemrod
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Get access



Traditionally, much of the literature on state corporate taxation has focused on how taxes affect the location of economic activity (see Wasylenko, 1997). A perpetual concern among policymakers is that higher tax rates or broader tax bases will retard regional economic development. In contrast, some recent research has begun to focus more on tax planning, or how firms expand after-tax profits by adjusting to tax policy through financial arrangements within related firms. Interest in tax planning among businesses is evidenced by the fact that each of the Big Four accounting firms and many banks maintain specific groups to deal exclusively with aiding firms in making arrangements to reduce their tax liability.

Tax planning is defined here as a broad set of tax avoidance and evasion schemes that affect only financial arrangements of firms. Tax planning is contrasted with strategies in which firms move physical operations to avoid higher taxes – herein termed locational distortions of tax policy. Firms may also respond to corporate taxation by altering the input mix or production technology, though no attempt is made here to measure the implications of this third effect. Tax planning exploits differences in state tax policies and often involves sophisticated arrangements wherein firms create one or more subsidiaries for the purpose of shifting income from high- to lower-tax jurisdictions. Tax planning strategies are often legal, but some may fall into a legally gray area or even be blatantly illegal methods of tax evasion, such as underreporting taxable income or overstating tax deductions.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Associated Industries of Massachusetts. 2004. “A Response to Proponents of Combined Reporting: Combined Reporting Is Bad for Massachusetts.” State Tax Notes 32(2): 135–136.
Bankman, Joseph. 1999. “The New Market in Corporate Tax Shelters.” Tax Notes 83(12): 1775–1795.Google Scholar
Bartik, Timothy J. 1991. “Who Benefits from State and Local Economic Development Policies?” (Kalamazoo, MI: Upjohn Institute).
Bartik, Timothy J. 1994. “Jobs, Productivity, and Local Economic Development: What Implications Does Economic Research Have for the Role of Government?National Tax Journal 47(4): 847–861.Google Scholar
Bureau of National Affairs (BNA). 2004. “Holding Companies.” BNA Tax Management Multistate Tax Report. Vol. 11(4): S65–S68.
Cline, Robert, Mikesell, John L., Neubig, Thomas S., and Phillips, Andrew. 2005. “Sales Taxation of Business Inputs: Existing Tax Distortions and the Consequences of Extending the Sales Tax to Business Services.” State Tax Notes 35(7): 457–470.Google Scholar
Cline, Robert, Fox, William, Neubig, Thomas S., and Phillips, Andrew. 2003a. “A Closer Examination of the Total State and Local Business Tax Burden.” State Tax Notes 27(4): 295–303.Google Scholar
Cline, Robert, Fox, William, Neubig, Thomas S., and Phillips, Andrew. 2003b. “Total State and Local Business Taxes: Fiscal Year 2003 Update.” State Tax Notes 30(3): 205–210.Google Scholar
Crocker, Keith J., and Joel Slemrod. 2004. “Corporate Tax Evasion with Agency Costs.” NBER Working Paper 10690. (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Desai, Mihir A. 2002. “The Corporate Profit Base, Tax Sheltering Activity, and the Changing Nature of Employee Compensation.” NBER Working Paper 8866. (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Desai, Mihir A., and Dhammika Dharmapala. 2004. “Earnings Management and Corporate Tax Shelters.” NBER Working Paper 11241. (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Desai, Mihir A., and Hines, James R. Jr. 2002a. “Expectations and Expatriations: Tracing the Causes and Consequences of Corporate Inversions.” National Tax Journal 60(3): 409–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edmiston, Kelly. 2002. “Strategic Apportionment of the State Corporate Income Tax: An Applied General Equilibrium Analysis.” National Tax Journal 55(2): 239–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Federation of Tax Administrators. 2004. “Range of State Corporate Income Tax Rates.” Washington, DC.
Fox, William F., and Luna, LeAnn. 2002. “State Corporate Tax Revenue Trends: Causes and Possible Solutions.” National Tax Journal 55(3): 491–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, William F., and Luna, LeAnn. 2005. “Do Limited Liability Companies Explain Declining State Corporate Tax Revenues?Public Finance Review 33(6): 690–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, William F., Luna, LeAnn, and Murray, Matthew. 2005. “How Should a Subnational Corporate Income Tax on Multistate Businesses Be Structured?National Tax Journal 58(1): 139–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gentry, William M., and R. Glenn Hubbard. 1998. “Fundamental Tax Reform and Corporate Financial Policy.” In Poterba, James M., ed., Tax Policy and the Economy, vol. 12. (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), pp. 191–227.Google Scholar
Hausman, Jerry A. 1978. “Specification Tests in Econometrics.” Econometrica 46(6): 1251–1271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hines, James R., Jr. 2002. “On the Timeliness of Tax Reform.” NBER Working Paper 8909. (Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research).
Houghton, Kendall L., Hogroian, Ferdinand, and Weinreb, Adam. 2004. “Unitary/Combined Filings: Old Concept, New Focus.” State Tax Notes 33(6): 457–471.Google Scholar
Inman, Robert P., and Rubinfeld, Daniel L.. 1996. “Designing Tax Policy in Federalist Economies: An Overview.” Journal of Public Economics 60(3): 307–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, LeAnn. 2004. “Corporate Tax Avoidance Strategies and Solutions.” Journal of Multistate Taxation and Incentives 14(2): 6–17, 46–48.Google Scholar
Mackie, James B. III. 2000. “The Puzzling Comeback of the Corporate Income Tax.” Proceedings of the Ninety-Second Annual Conference on Taxation. (Washington, DC: National Tax Association), pp. 93–102.Google Scholar
Mazerov, Michael. 2003. “Closing Three Common Corporate Income Tax Loopholes Could Raise Additional Revenue for Many States.” (Washington, DC: Center for Budget and Policy Priorities).
McIntyre, Michael J., Mines, Paul, and Pomp, Richard D.. 2001. “Designing a Combined Reporting Regime for a State Corporate Income Tax: A Case Study of Louisiana.” Louisiana Law Review 61(4): 699–761.Google Scholar
Mintz, Jack, and Smart, Michael. 2004. “Income Shifting, Investment, and Tax Competition: Theory and Evidence from Provincial Taxation in Canada.” Journal of Public Economics 88(6): 1149–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association of State Development Agencies. Various years. “Directory of Incentives for Business Investment and Development in the United States: A State-by-State Guide.” (Washington, DC: Urban Institute).
Rego, Sonja Olhoft. 2003. “Tax-Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations.” Contemporary Accounting Research (20)4: 805–833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiller, Zach. 2002. “Ohio's Vanishing Corporate Franchise Tax.” State Tax Notes 26: 537–550.Google Scholar
Slemrod, Joel. 1998. “Methodological Issues in Measuring and Interpreting Taxable Income Elasticities.” National Tax Journal 51(4): 773–788.Google Scholar
Slemrod, Joel. 2001. “A General Model of the Behavioral Response to Taxation.” International Tax and Public Finance 8(2): 119–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slemrod, Joel. 2004. “The Economics of Corporate Tax Selfishness.” National Tax Journal 57(4): 877–899.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of the Treasury. 1999. “The Problem of Corporate Tax Shelters: Discussion, Analysis and Legislative Proposals.” (Washington, DC: U.S. DOT).
U.S. Department of the Treasury. Internal Revenue Service. Various years. “Annual Report: Commissioner of the Internal Revenue Service and the Chief Counsel for the Internal Revenue Service.” (Washington, DC).
U.S. General Accounting Office. 1998. “IRS' Tax Gap Studies.” GAP/GGD-88–66BR. (Washington, DC: U.S. GAO).
U.S. General Accounting Office. 2003. “Challenges Remain in Combating Abusive Tax Shelters.” Testimony before the Senate Finance Committee on Finance. (Washington, DC: U.S. GAO).
Wasylenko, Michael. 1997. “Taxation and Economic Development: The State of the Economic Literature.” New England Economic Review (March/April): 37–52.Google Scholar
Wasylenko, Michael, and McGuire, Therese. 1985. “Jobs and Taxes: The Effect of Taxes on States' Employment Growth Rates.” National Tax Journal 38(4): 497–514.Google Scholar
Zodrow, George R. 2003. “Reflections on the Economic Theory of Local Tax Incentives.” State Tax Notes 28(10): 891–900.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats