Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-l69ms Total loading time: 0.691 Render date: 2022-08-14T03:53:32.977Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

Select Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  29 January 2021

Brian Davies
Affiliation:
Fordham University, New York
Michael Ruse
Affiliation:
University of Guelph, Ontario
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Taking God Seriously
Two Different Voices
, pp. 213 - 218
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alston, W. 1991. Perceiving God. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1974. “‘Whatever has a beginning of existence must have a cause’: Hume’s Argument Exposed.” Analysis 34: 145151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1981. Collected Philosophical Papers, vol. 3: Ethics, Religion and Politics. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2000. Intention. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2008. “What Is It to Believe Someone?” In Faith in a Hard Ground: Essays on Religion, Philosophy and Ethics. Ed. Geach, M. and Gormally, L.. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 2015. “Grounds of Belief.” In Logic, Truth and Meaning: Writings by G. E. M. Anscombe. Ed. Geach, M. and Gormally, L.. Exeter: Imprint Academic.Google Scholar
St.Anselm, 1903. Anselm: Proslogium, Monologium, an Appendix on Behalf of the Fool by Gaunilon; and Cur Deus Homo. Trans. Deane, S. N.. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
St. Aquinas, T. [1259–65] 1963. Summa theologiae. London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar
St. Aquinas, T. 1975. Summa contra Gentiles. Trans. Bourke, V. J.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
St.Augustine, [396] 1982. The Literal Meaning of Genesis. Trans. Taylor, J. H.. New York: Newman.Google Scholar
St.Augustine, 1998. Confessions. Trans. Chadwick, H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1946. Language, Truth and Logic, 2nd ed. London: Gollancz.Google Scholar
Ayer, A. J. 1976. The Central Questions of Philosophy. London: Pelican Books.Google Scholar
Barnes, J., ed. 1984. The Complete Works of Aristotle. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barrow, J. D., and Tipler, F. J.. 1986. The Anthropic Cosmological Principle. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Beanblossom, R. E., and Lehrer, K., eds. 1975. Thomas Reid’s Inquiry and Essays. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Boyle, R. [1688] 1966. “A Disquisition about the Final Causes of Natural Things.” In The Works of Robert Boyle. Ed. Birch, T., 5: 392444. Hildesheim: Georg Olms.Google Scholar
Braine, D. 1988. The Reality of Time and the Existence of God. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Browne, J. 1995. Charles Darwin: Voyaging, Volume 1 of a Biography. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Brunner, E., and Barth, K.. 2002. Natural Theology. Eugene: Wipf and Stock.Google Scholar
Calvin, J. 1536. Institutes of the Christian Religion. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Clifford, W. K. 1879. Lectures and Essays. Ed. Stephen, L. and Pollack, F.. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Cooper, J. M., ed. 1997. Plato: Complete Works. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Coyne, J. A. 2015. Faith vs. Fact: Why Science and Religion Are Incompatible. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Craig, W. L. 1979. The Kalām Cosmological Argument. London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, T. 2017. The Meaning of Belief: Religion from an Atheist’s Point of View. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cross, F. L., and Livingstone, E. A., eds. 1997. The Oxford Dictionary of the Christian Church, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1859. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1871. The Descent of Man, and Selection in Relation to Sex. London: John Murray.Google Scholar
Darwin, C. 1985. The Correspondence of Charles Darwin. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davidson, D. 1963. “Actions, Reasons and Causes.” Journal of Philosophy 60: 685700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davies, B. 2004. An Introduction to the Philosophy of Religion, 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, B., and Kucharski, P., eds. 2016. The McCabe Reader. London: Bloomsbury T&T Clark.Google Scholar
Davies, B., and Leftow, B., eds. 2006. Aquinas: Summa theologiae, Questions on God. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1983. “Universal Darwinism.” In Evolution from Molecules to Men. Ed. Bendall, D. S., 403–25. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 1986. The Blind Watchmaker. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 2003. A Devil’s Chaplain: Reflections on Hope, Lies, Science and Love. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R. 2006. The God Delusion. New York: Houghton, Mifflin, Harcourt.Google Scholar
Dawkins, R., and Krebs, J. R.. 1979. “Arms Races between and within Species.” Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, B 205: 489511.Google ScholarPubMed
Dennett, D. C. 1984. Elbow Room: The Varieties of Free Will Worth Wanting. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dennett, D. C. 2006. Breaking the Spell: Religion as a Natural Phenomenon. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Descartes, R. 1964. Meditations. In Philosophical Essays, 59143. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Desmond, A. 1998. Huxley: From Devil’s Disciple to Evolution’s High Priest. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Dickinson, E. 2003. The Collected Poems of Emily Dickinson. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Duffy, E. 1992. The Stripping of the Altars: Traditional Religion in England 1400–1580. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2009. Aquinas: A Beginner’s Guide. London: Oneworld.Google Scholar
Feser, E. 2017. Five Proofs of the Existence of God. San Francisco: Ignatius Press.Google Scholar
Foot, P. 2001. Natural Goodness. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, W. 2007. On What Cannot Be Said: Apophatic Discourses in Philosophy, Religion, Literature, and the Arts, vol. 1: Classic Formulations. South Bend, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1956. “Good and Evil.” Analysis 17: 3342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1969. God and the Soul. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1973. “An Irrelevance of Omnipotence.” Philosophy 46: 720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geach, P. T. 1976. Reason and Argument. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Grisez, G. 1975. Beyond the New Theism. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Gunton, C. 2002. Act and Being. Grand Rapids: William B. Eerdmans.Google Scholar
Haldane, J. B. S. 1927. Possible Worlds and Other Essays. London: Chatto and Windus.Google Scholar
Hanfling, O. 1981. Logical Positivism. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Harris, S. 2004. The End of Faith: Religion, Terror, and the Future of Reason. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hauerwas, S. [1988] 2001. “On Being a Church Capable of Addressing a World at War: A Pacifist Response to the United Methodist Bishops’ Pastoral in Defense of Creation.” In The Hauerwas Reader, 426–58. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hause, J., ed. 2018. Aquinas’s “Summa theologiae”: A Critical Guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heidegger, M. 1959. An Introduction to Metaphysics. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J. 1973. God and the Universe of Faiths: Essays in the Philosophy of Religion. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
Hick, J. 2005. An Autobiography. London: Oneworld Publications.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1757] 1963. A Natural History of Religion. In Hume on Religion. Ed. Wollheim, R.. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Hume, D. [1779] 1963. Dialogues Concerning Natural Religion. In Hume on Religion. Ed. Wollheim, R., 93204. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 2000. A Treatise of Human Nature. Ed. Norton, D. F. and Norton, M. J.. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hume, D. 2007. An Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Huxley, J. S. 1942. Evolution: The Modern Synthesis. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Huxley, T. H. 2009. Evolution and Ethics with a New Introduction. Ed. Ruse, M.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
James, W. 1902. Varieties of Religious Experience: A Study in Human Nature. New York: Longman.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, John II. 1998. Fides et Ratio: Encyclical Letter of John Paul II to the Catholic Bishops of the World. Vatican City: L’Osservatore Romano.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1949. Critique of Practical Reason. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kant, I. 1959. Foundations of the Metaphysics of Morals. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Kant, I. [1787] 2017. Critique of Pure Reason, 2nd ed. Trans. and ed. Bennett, J..Google Scholar
Kenny, A. 1969. The Five Ways. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Kierkegaard, S. 1992. Concluding Unscientific Postscript to Philosophical Fragments, Volume 1 (Kierkegaard’s Writings, Vol. 12.1). Trans. Hong, H. V. and Hong, E. H.. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. 1993. “Metaphor in Science.” In Metaphor and Thought, 2nd ed. Ed. Ortony, Andrew, 533–42. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lakoff, G., and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Leibniz, G. F. W. 1714. Monadology and Other Philosophical Essays. New York: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. [1952] 2015. Mere Christianity. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Lewis, C. S. 1955. Surprised by Joy: The Shape of My Early Life. London: Geoffrey Bles.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1955. “Evil and Omnipotence.” Mind 64: 200212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1982. The Miracle of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Malcolm, N. 1977. “The Groundlessness of Belief in God.” In Reason and Religion. Ed. Brown, S. C.. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marmion, D., and Nieuwenhove, R. V.. 2011. An Introduction to the Trinity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McCabe, H. 2002. God Still Matters. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
McCabe, H. 2005. The Good Life. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
McCall, T., and Rea, M., eds. 2009. Philosophical and Theological Essays on the Trinity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, T. 1968a. “Original Sin (I).” New Blackfriars 49: 180–89.Google Scholar
McDermott, T. 1968b. “Original Sin (II).” New Blackfriars 49: 237–43.Google Scholar
McGrath, A. E. 1997. Christian Theology: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Metzger, B. 1987. The Canon of the New Testament: Its Origins, Development, and Significance. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Miller, B. 1992. From Existence to God: A Contemporary Philosophical Argument. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Moore, G. 1983. “Incarnation and Image of God.” New Blackfriars 64: 452–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1903. Principia Ethica. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1925. “A Defence of Common Sense.” In Contemporary British Philosophy. Ed. Muirhead, J. H., 2: 193223. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Moore, G. E. 1939. “Proof of an External World.” Proceedings of the British Academy 25.Google Scholar
Newman, J. H. 1870. A Grammar of Assent. New York: Catholic Publishing Society.Google Scholar
Noll, M. 2002. America’s God: From Jonathan Edwards to Abraham Lincoln. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, J., and Ruse, M.. 2020. Social Darwinism (Cambridge Elements on the Philosophy of Biology). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Owen, H. P. 1965. The Moral Argument for Christian Theism. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Paley, W. [1802] 1819. Collected Works, vol. 4: Natural Theology. London: Rivington.Google Scholar
Pinker, S. 2011. The Better Angels of Our Nature: Why Violence Has Declined. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1974. The Nature of Necessity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plantinga, A. 1980. Does God Have a Nature? Milwaukee: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Porterfield, A. 2012. Conceived in Doubt: Religion and Politics in the New American Nation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rahner, K. 1998. The Trinity. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
Re Manning, R., ed. 2013. The Oxford Handbook of Natural Theology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R. J., and Ruse, M.. 2016. Debating Darwin. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, W. 1979. “The Problem of Evil and Some Varieties of Atheism.” American Philosophical Quarterly 16: 335–41.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1986. Taking Darwin Seriously: A Naturalistic Approach to Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 1996. Monad to Man: The Concept of Progress in Evolutionary Biology. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2001. Can a Darwinian Be a Christian? The Relationship between Science and Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2003. Darwin and Design: Does Evolution Have a Purpose? Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2010. Science and Spirituality: Making Room for Faith in the Age of Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 2012. The Philosophy of Human Evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2013. The Gaia Hypothesis: Science on a Pagan Planet. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 2017. Darwinism as Religion: What Literature Tells Us about Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ruse, M. 2017. On Purpose. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 2019. The Darwinian Revolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruse, M. 2019. A Meaning to Life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Russell, B. 1959. My Philosophical Development. London: Allen and Unwin.Google Scholar
Sartre, J. P. 1948. Existentialism and Humanism. Brooklyn, NY: Haskell House Publishers Ltd.Google Scholar
Schleiermacher, F. 1928. The Christian Faith. Edinburgh: T. and T. Clark.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. 1857. “Progress: Its Law and Cause.” Westminster Review 67: 244–67.Google Scholar
Stevenson, C. L. 1944. Ethics and Language. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Stump, E. 2016. The God of the Bible and the God of the Philosophers. Marquette: Marquette University Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1977. The Coherence of Theism. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Swinburne, R. 1993. The Coherence of Theism, revised ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2004. The Existence of God, 2nd ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, R. 2010. Is There a God?, revised ed. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1977. The First Three Minutes: A Modern View of the Origin of the Universe. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Weinberg, S. 1999. “A Designer Universe?New York Review of Books 46, no. 16: 4648.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. [1853] 2001. Of the Plurality of Worlds. A Facsimile of the First Edition of 1853: Plus Previously Unpublished Material Excised by the Author Just before the Book Went to Press; and Whewell’s Dialogue Rebutting His Critics, Reprinted from the Second Edition. Ed. Ruse, M.. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Williams, C. J. F. 1994. “Neither Confounding the Persons nor Dividing the Substance.” In Reason and the Christian Religion: Essays in Honour of Richard Swinburne. Ed. Padgett, A. G.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Williams, P. J. 2018. Can We Trust the Gospels? Wheaton: Crossway.Google Scholar
Wilson, E. O. 1978. On Human Nature. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google ScholarPubMed
Wilson, E. O. 1992. The Diversity of Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1922. Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Wittgenstein, L. 1974. On Certainty. Ed. Anscombe, G. E. M. and von Wright, G. H.; trans. Paul, D. and Anscombe, G. E. M.. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Zell-Ravenheart, O. 2009. Green Egg Omelet: An Anthology of Art and Articles from the Legendary Pagan Journal. Franklin Lakes, NJ: New Page Books.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Brian Davies, Fordham University, New York, Michael Ruse, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Taking God Seriously
  • Online publication: 29 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867375.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Brian Davies, Fordham University, New York, Michael Ruse, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Taking God Seriously
  • Online publication: 29 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867375.009
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Select Bibliography
  • Brian Davies, Fordham University, New York, Michael Ruse, University of Guelph, Ontario
  • Book: Taking God Seriously
  • Online publication: 29 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108867375.009
Available formats
×