Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)
Advisory Committee on Head Start Research and Evaluation (1999). Evaluating Head Start: A Recommended Framework for Studying the Impact of the Head Start Program. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services.
Ansari, A. & Winsler, A. (2013). Stability and sequence of center-based and family childcare: links with low-income children’s school readiness. Children and Youth Services Review, 35, 358–366. DOI: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2012.11.017CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, E. W. & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling?Reading Research Quarterly, 25, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., Clark Brown, K. & Horowitz, M. (2015). The State of Preschool 2014. The National Institute for Early Education Research.Google Scholar
Bogard, K. & Takanishi, R. (2005). PK–3: An aligned and coordinated approach to education for children 3 to 8 years old. SRCD Social Policy Reports, 19(3), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. & Morris, P. A. (2006). The Bioecological Model of Human Development, in Handbook of Child Psychology (6th edn.): Vol 1, Theoretical Models of Human Development. (pp. 793–828). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons Inc.Google Scholar
Claessens, A., Engel, M. & Curran, C., (2014). Academic content, student learning, and the persistence of preschool effects. American Educational Research Journal, 51(2), 403–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and Education. New York, NY: Collier Books.Google Scholar
Duncan, G. (2015). Boosting school readiness with preschool curricula. Paper presentation at the 2015 Human Capital Research Collaborative National Invitational Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Dunn, L. M., Dunn, L. L. & Dunn, D.M. (1997). Peabody Picture and Vocabulary Test (PPVT) (3rd edn.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.Google Scholar
Durston, S. & Casey, B. J. (2006). What have we learned about cognitive development from neuroimaging?Neuropsychologia, 44(11), 2149–2157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamre, B., Pianta, R., Downer, J. et al. (2013). Teaching through interactions: testing a developmental framework of teacher effectiveness in over 4,000 classrooms. Elementary School Journal, 113(4), 461–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kagan, S. L., Karnati, R., Friedlander, J. & Tarrant, K., (2010). A Compendium of Transition Initiatives in the Early Years: A Resource Guide to Alignment and Continuity Efforts in the United States and Other Countries. New York, NY: National Center for Children and Families.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. L. & Neuman, M. J. (1998). Three decades of transition research: what does it tell us?Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 365–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lutz, M. N., Fantuzzo, J. F. & McDermott, P. (2002). Contextually relevant assessment of the emotional and behavioral adjustment of low-income preschool children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 17, 338–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashburn, A. J. & Pianta, R. (2010). Opportunity in early education: Improving teacher-child interactions and child outcomes, in Reynolds, A., Rolnick, A., Englund, M. & Temple, J. (Eds.), Childhood Programs and Practices in the First Decade of Life: A Human Capital Integration. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, pp. 243–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mashburn, A. J., Pianta, R. C., Hamre, B. K. et al. (2008). Measures of classroom quality in prekindergarten and children’s development of academic, language, and social skills. Child Development, 79(3), 732–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Puma, M., Bell, S. H., Cook, R. & Heid, C. (2010). Head Start Impact Study: Technical Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
Puma, M., Bell, S., Cook, R. et al. (2012). Third Grade Follow-Up to the Head Start Impact Study Final Report. OPRE Report no. 2012–45b. Washington, DC: US Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Planning, Research and Evaluation, Administration for Children and Families.Google Scholar
R Core Team. (2015). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing, www.R-project.org.
Ramey, S. L., Ramey, C. T., Phillips, M. M. et al. (2000). Head Start Children’s Entry into Public School: A Report on the National Head Start/Public School Early Childhood Transition Demonstration Study. Birmingham, Al: Civitan International Research, University of Alabama at Birmingham.Google Scholar
Stipek, D. (2015). Quality and continuity in young children’s educational experiences. Paper presentation at the 2015 Human Capital Research Collaborative National Invitational Conference. Minneapolis, MN.
Styfco, S. & Zigler, E. (2003). Early childhood programs for a new century. Reynolds, A., & Wang, M. (Eds.), The Federal Commitment to Preschool Education: Lessons From and For Head Start (pp. 3–33). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America, Inc.Google Scholar
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families (January 2010). Head Start Impact Study. Final Report. Washington, DC.
Barnett, S., Jung, K., Yarosz, D. et al. (2008). Educational effects of the tools of the mind curriculum: a randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 23, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, S. W. (2011). Effectiveness of early education interventions. Science, 333, 975–978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bierman, K. & Torres, M. (2016). Promoting the development of executive functions through early education and prevention programs, in Griffin, J. A., Freund, L.S. & McCardle, P. (Eds.), Executive Function in Preschool Age Children: Integrating Measurement, Neurodevelopment and Translational Research. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Bogard, K. & Takanishi, R. (2005). PK–3: An aligned and coordinated approach to education for children 3 to 8 years old. SRCD Social Policy Report.CrossRef
Cai, J., Ding, M. & Wang, T. (2013). How do exemplary Chinese and U.S. mathematics teachers view instructional coherence?Educational Studies in Mathematics, 85(2), 265–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caspe, M. (2005). A catalog of family process measures. The evaluation exchange: evaluating family involvement programs. Harvard Family Research Project, 10(4), 8–9.Google Scholar
Chambers, B., Cheung, A. & Slavin, T. (2016). Literacy and language outcomes of comprehensive and developmental-constructivist approaches to early childhood education: a systematic review. Educational Research Review, 18, 88–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, D. H. & Sarama, J. (2014). Learning and Teaching Early Math: The Learning Trajectories Approach (2nd edn.). New York, NY: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, J. & Thomas, D. (2000). School quality and the longer-term effects of Head Start. Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiPerna, J. C., Lei, P. W. & Reid, E. E. (2007). Kindergarten predictors of mathematical growth in the primary grades: an investigation using the early childhood longitudinal study, kindergarten cohort. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 369–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. J., Dowsett, C. J., Claessens, A. et al. (2007). School readiness and later achievement. Developmental Psychology, 43(6),1428–1446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duncan, G. & Magnuson, K. (2011). The nature and impact of early achievement skills, attention skills, and behavior problems, in Duncan, G. & Murnane, R. (Eds.), Whither Opportunity: Rising Inequality, Schools, and Children’s Life Chances (pp. 47–69). New York, NY: Russell Sage.Google Scholar
Durlak, J., Weissberg, R., Dymnicki, A., Taylor, R. & Schellinger, K. (2011). The Impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Emmer, E. T. & Strough, L. (2001). Classroom management: a critical part of educational psychology, with implications for teacher education. Educational Psychologist, 36, 103–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Engel, M., Claessens, A. & Finch, M. (2013). Teaching students what they already know? The (Mis) Alignment between mathematics instructional content and student knowledge in kindergarten. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(2), 157–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferrini-Mundy, J., Burrill, G. & Schmidt, W. H. (2007). Building teacher capacity for implementing curricular coherence: mathematics teacher professional development tasks. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 10(4–6), 311–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuller, B., Bein, E., Bridges, M., Kim, Y. & Rabe-Hesketh, S. (2017). Do academic preschools yield stronger benefits? Cognitive emphasis, dosage, and early learning. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology 52, 1–11Google Scholar
Galindo, C. & Fuller, B. (2010). The social competence of Latino kindergartners and growth in mathematical understanding. Developmental Psychology, 46(3), 579–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldenberg, C., Hicks, J. & Lit, I. (2013). Teaching young English learners, in Reutzel, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Research-Based Practice in Early Childhood Education (pp. 140–160). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Good, T. & Grouws, D. (1977). Teaching effects: a process-product study of fourth grade mathematics classrooms. Journal of Teacher Education, 28, 49–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, B. (2006). PK–3: What is it and how do we know it works? Foundation for Child Development Working Paper 4: Advancing PK–3.
Hamre, B. (2014). Teachers’ daily interactions with children: an essential ingredient in effective early childhood programs. Child Development Perspectives, 4, 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamre, B. K. & Pianta, R. C. (2005), Can instructional and emotional support in the first-grade classroom make a difference for children at risk of school failure?Child Development, 76, 949–967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanushek, E. (2002). Teacher quality, in Izumi, L. T. and Evers, W. M. (Ed.), Teacher Quality. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press, pp. 1–12.Google Scholar
Henderson, A. & Mapp, K. (2002). A New Wave of Evidence: The Impact of School, Family and Community Connections on Student Achievement. Austin, TX: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory. www.sedl.org/connectionsGoogle Scholar
Hirsh-Pasek, K., Golinkoff, R., Berk, L. & Singer, D. (2009). A Mandate for Playful Learning in Preschool: Presenting the Evidence. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hyson, M., Whittaker, J., Zaslow, M. et al. (2011). Measuring the quality of environmental supports for young children’s social and emotional competence, in Zaslow, M., Martinez-Beck, I., Tout, K. & Halle, T. (Eds.), Quality Measurement in Early Childhood Settings (pp. 105–134). Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kauerz, K. (2006). Ladders of learning: Fighting fade-out by advancing PK–3 alignment. New America Foundation Early Education Initiative, Issue Brief No. 3.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (2003). Explorations in Language Acquisition and Use. Portsmouth: Heinemann.Google Scholar
Luciana, M. & Nelson, C. (1998). The functional emergence of prefrontally-guided working memory systems in four- to eight-year-old children. Neuropsychologia, 36, 273–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Association for the Education of Young Children, & National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2010). Early childhood mathematics: Promoting good beginnings (Joint position statement). Washington, DC. Retrieved from www.naeyc.org/files/naeyc/file/positions/psmath.pdf
National Reading Panel (US) & National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (US). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and Its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.
National Research Council (US). (1998). Preventing Reading Difficulties in Young Children. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (US). (2001). Adding It Up: Helping Children Learn Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (US). (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
National Research Council (US). (2009). Mathematics learning in early childhood: paths toward excellence and equity, in Cross, C., Woods, T. & Schweingruber, H. (Eds.), Committee on Early Childhood Mathematics. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
National Research Council (U.S.). (2010). Language Diversity, School Learning, and Closing Achievement Gaps: A Workshop Summary. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.
Nesbitt, K., Farran, D. & Fuhs, M. (2015). Executive function skills and academic achievement gains in prekindergarten: Contributions of learning-related behaviors. Developmental Psychology, 51(7), 865–878.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nguyen, T., Watts, T. W., Duncan, G. J. et al. (2016). Which preschool mathematics competencies are most predictive of fifth grade achievement?Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 36, 550–560.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Obradovic, J., Portilla, X. A. & Boyce, W. T. (2012). Executive functioning and developmental neuroscience, in Pianta, R. (Ed.), Handbook of Early Childhood Education (pp. 324–351). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Pagani, C., Archambault, I. & Janosz, M. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: A French Canadian replication and extension. Developmental Psychology, 46, 984–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Payton, J., Weissberg, R., Durlak, J. et al. (2008). The Positive Impact of Social and Emotional Learning for Kindergarten to Eighth-Grade Students: Findings from Three Scientific Reviews. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.Google Scholar
Peske, H. G. & Haycock, K. (2006). Teaching Inequality: How Poor and Minority Students Are Shortchanged on Teacher Quality. Washington, DC: The Education Trust.Google Scholar
Pianta, R. (1999). Enhancing Relationships Between Children and Teachers. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pomerantz, E. M., Moorman, E. A. & Cheung, C. S. (2012). Parents’ involvement in children’s learning, in Harris, K. R., Graham, S., Urdan, T. C. et al. (Eds.), APA Educational Psychology Handbook (pp. 417–440). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Consortium (2008). Effects of Preschool Curriculum Programs on School Readiness Report from the Preschool Curriculum Evaluation Research Initiative. Washington, DC: Institute for Education Sciences.
Pressley, M. (2002). Before reading instruction begins, in Pressley, M. (Ed.), Reading Instruction That Works: The Case for Balanced Teaching (2nd edn., pp. 90–133). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
Ramey, D. & Gambrell, L. (2013). Motivating and engaging children in early childhood settings, in Reutzel, R. (Ed.). Handbook of Research-Based Practice in Early Childhood Education (pp. 193–204). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Raver, C. C., Jones, S. M., Li-Grining, C. P. et al. (2011). CSRP’s impact on low-income preschoolers’ pre-academic skills: Self-regulation as a mediating mechanism. Child Development, 82(1), 362–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A., Magnuson, K. & Ou, S. (2006). PK–3 education: programs and practices that work in children’s first decade. Foundation for Child Development Working Paper 6: Advancing PK–3.
Romano, E., Kohen, D., Babchishin, L. & Pagani, L. S. (2010). School readiness and later achievement: replication and extension study using a nation-wide Canadian survey. Developmental Psychology, 46, 995–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudasill, K., Gallagher, K. & White, J. (2010). Temperamental attention and activity, classroom emotional support, and academic achievement in third grade. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 113–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sabol, T. & Pianta, R. (2012). Recent trends in research on teacher–child relationships. Attachment and Human Development, 14(3), 213–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schweinhart, L., Barnes, H. & Weikart, D. (1993). Significant benefits: The High/Scope Perry preschool study through age 27 [Monograph]. High/Scope Educational Research Foundation, No. 10.
Stipek, D. (2002). Motivation to Learn: Integrating Theory and Practice (4th edn.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Stipek, D. (2011). Classroom practices and children’s motivation to learn, in Zigler, E., Gilliam, W. S. & Barnett, W. S. (Eds.), The Pre-K Debates: Current Controversies & Issues (pp. 98–103). Baltimore, MA: Paul H. Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
Stipek, D. & Johnson, N. (in press). Developmentally appropriate practice in early childhood education redefined: the case of math, in Graue, B., Levin, F. & Ryan, S. (Eds.), Advancing Knowledge and
Building Capacity for Early Childhood Research: Creating Synergies Among Segregated Scholarly Communities. Washington, DC: American Education Research Association.
Stipek, D., Clements, D., Coburn, C., Franke, M. & Farran, D. (2017). PK–3: What does it mean for instruction?SRCD Social Policy Report, 30(2), 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takanishi, R. (2016). First Things First! Creating the New American Primary School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Tominey, S. & McClelland, M. (2011). Red light, purple light: Findings from a randomized trial using circle time games to improve behavioral self-regulation in preschool, Early Education & Development, 22, 489–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valentino, R. & Stipek, D. (2016). PreK–3 Alignment in California’s Education System: Obstacles and Opportunities. Stanford University: Policy Analysis for California Education.Google Scholar
Watts, T., Duncan, G., Siegler, R. & Davis-Kean, P. (2014). What’s past is prologue: Relations between early mathematics knowledge and high school achievement. Educational Researcher, 43(7), 352–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wigfield, A. & Wentzel, K. (2007). Introduction to motivation at school: Interventions that work. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 191–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, P. E., Coley, R. J. (2009). Parsing the Achievement Gap II. Policy Information Report. Princeton, NJ: ETS.Google Scholar
Belfield, C. R. & Levin, H. M., (Eds.) (2007). The Price We Pay: Economic and Social Consequences of Inadequate Education. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Bogard, K. & Takanishi, R. (2005). PK–3: An Aligned and Coordinated Approach to Education for Children 3 to 8 years old.Social Policy Report, XIX, No. III. Washington, DC: Society for Research in Child Developmena.Google Scholar
Boyd, W. L., & Crowson, R. L. (1993). Coordinated services for children: designing arks for storms and seas unknown. American Journal of Education, 101, 140–179.Google Scholar
Braveman, P. & Gottlieb, L. (2014). The social determinants of health: it’s time to consider the causes of the causes. Public Health Reports, 129 (Suppl. 2), 19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. Annals of Child Development, 6, 187–249.Google Scholar
Bryk, A. S., Sebring, P. B., Allensworth, E., Luppescu, S. & Easton, J. Q. (2010). Organizing Schools for Improvement: Lessons from Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Camilli, G., Vargas, S., Ryan, S. & Barnett, W. S. (2010). Meta-analysis of the effects of early education interventions on cognitive and social development. Teachers College Record, 112(3), 579–620.Google Scholar
Conrad, K. J. & Eash, M. J. (1983). Measuring implementation and multiple outcomes in a Child–Parent Center compensatory education program. American Educational Research Journal, 20, 221–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Currie, J., & Thomas, D. (2000). School quality and the longer-term effects of Head Start. The Journal of Human Resources, 35(4), 755–774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Englund, M. M., White, B., Reynolds, A. J., Schweinhart, L. J. and Campbell, F. A. (2014). Health outcomes of early childhood interventions: A 3-study analysis, in Reynolds, A. J. et al. (Eds.), Health and Education in Early Childhood: Predictors, Interventions, and Policies. New York, NY: Cambridge.Google Scholar
Frank, L., Basch, E. & Selby, J. V. (2014). The PCORI perspective on patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 312(15), 1513–1514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Government Accountability Office. (2015). Pay for Success: Collaboration among Federal Agencies Would Be Helpful as Governments Explore New Financing Mechanisms (GAO-15–646). Washington, DC.
Hayakawa, M., Englund, M. M., Warner-Richter, M. N. & Reynolds, A. J. (2013). The longitudinal process of early parent involvement on student achievement: a path analysis. National Head Start Association Dialog, 16, 103–126.Google Scholar
Human Capital Research Collaborative. (2012). Program Requirement and Guidelines, Midwest Expansion of the Child–Parent Center Program, Preschool to Third Grade. Minneapolis, MI: Human Capital Research Collaborative. http://humancapitalrc.org/midwestcpc.
Jeynes, W. H. (2007). The relationship between parental involvement and urban secondary school student academic achievement. Urban Education, 41(1), 82–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lambert, R., Kim, D. & Burts, D. (2013). Technical Manual for the Teaching Strategies Gold Assessment System (2nd edn.). CEME Technical Report. Center for Educational Measurement & Evaluation, Charlotte: University of North Carolina.Google Scholar
Manning, M., Garvis, S., Fleming, C. & Wong, G. T. W. (2017, January). The relationship between teacher qualification and the quality of the early education and care environment. Campbell Systematic Reviews. DOI: 10.4073/csr.2017.1 (http://campbellcollaboration.org/library).Google Scholar
National Assessment of Educational Progress. (2016). The Nation’s Report Card: 2015. Washington, DC: US Department of Education, National Center for Education Statistics.
O’Connell, M. E, Boat, T. & Warner, K. E. (Eds.). (2009). Preventing Mental, Emotional, and Behavioral Disorders among Young People: Progress and Possibilities. National Research Council. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Ou, S. & Reynolds, A. J. (2006). School-age services: Programs that extend the benefits of early care and education services, in Groark, C. J. et al. (Eds.), Evidence-Based Programs, Practices, and Policies for Early Childhood Care and Education (pp. 114–134). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (1994). Effects of a preschool plus follow-on intervention for children at risk. Developmental Psychology, 30, 787–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. (2012). Success in Early Intervention: The Chicago Child–Parent Centers. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press (Reprinted from 2000).Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Hayakawa, M, Candee, A. J. & Englund, M. M. (2016). CPC-P–3 Program Manual: Child–Parent Center Preschool–3rd Grade Program. Minneapolis, MI: University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Hayakawa, M., Ou, S. et al. (2017). Scaling and sustaining effective early childhood programs through school-family-community collaboration. Child Development, 88(5), 1453–1465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Magnuson, K. & Ou, S. (2010). PK-3 programs and practices: A review of research. Children and Youth Services Review, 32, 1121–1131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Richardson, B. A., Hayakawa, M., et al. (2014). Association of a full-day versus part-day preschool intervention with school readiness, attendance, and parent involvement. JAMA, 312(20): 2126–2134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Richardson, B. A., Hayakawa, M., et al. (2016). Multi-site expansion of an early childhood intervention and school readiness. Pediatrics, 137(7). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4587Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J. & Temple, J. A. (2008). Cost-effective early childhood development programs from preschool through third grade, Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 4, 109–139.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J. & Temple, J. A. (1998). Extended early childhood intervention and school achievement: Age 13 findings from the Chicago Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 69, 231–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Ou, S.Arteaga, I. A. & White, B. A. B. (2011a). School-based early childhood education and age-28 well-being: effects by timing, dosage, and subgroups. Science, 333(6040), 360–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L. & Mann, E. A. (2001). Long-term effects of an early childhood intervention on educational achievement and juvenile arrest: a 15-year follow-up of low-income children in public schools. Journal of the American Medical Association, 285, 2339–2346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., Robertson, D. L. & Mann, E.A. (2002). Age 21 cost–benefit analysis of the Title I Chicago Child–Parent Centers. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24, 267–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., White, B. A., Ou, S. & Robertson, D. L. (2011b). Age-26 cost–benefit analysis of the Child–Parent Center education program. Child Development, 82, 782–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rury, J. L. (2016). Education and Social Change: Contours in the History of American Schooling (5th edn.). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rutter, M. & Rutter, M. (1993). Developing Minds: Challenge and Continuity across the Life Span. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
See, B. H. & Gorard, S. (2015). The role of parents in young people’s education – a critical review of the causal evidence. Oxford Review of Education, 41(3): 346–366.Google Scholar
Spoth, R., Rohrbach, L. A., et al. (2013). Addressing core challenges for the next generation of Type 2 translation research and systems: The translation science in population impact (TSci Impact) framework. Prevention Science, 14, 319–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sweet, M. A. & Appelbaum, M. I. (2004). Is home visiting an effective strategy: a meta-analytic review of home visiting programs for families with young children. Child Development, 75, 1435–1456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Takanishi, R. (2016). First Things First! Creating the New American Primary School. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
Takanishi, R. & Kauerz, K. (2008). PK inclusion: getting serious about a P–16 education system. Phi Delta Kappan, 89(7), 480–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Temple, J. A. & Reynolds, A. J. (2015). Using benefit–cost analysis to scale up early childhood programs through Pay for Success financing. Journal of Benefit–Cost Analysis, 6(3), 628–653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
US Senate. (1967). Elementary and Secondary Education Act of 1965 (Report No. 146, pp. 1146–1461). Washington, DC: Author.
Zigler, E., Gilliam, W. S. & Jones, S. M. (2006). A Vision for Universal Preschool Education. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zigler, E. & Styfco, S. J. (1993). Head Start and Beyond: A National Plan for Extended Childhood Intervention. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Zigler, E. & Trickett, P. K. (1978). IQ, social competence, and the evaluation of early childhood intervention programs. American Psychologist, 33, 789–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, L. R. & Kelly, B. B. (Eds.). (2015). Transforming the Workforce for Children Birth through Age 8: A Unifying Foundation. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Baker, B. D., Sciarra, D. G. & Farrie, D. (2015).Is School Funding Fair? A National Report Card. (4th edn.) Newark, NJ: Education Law Center.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S., Carolan, M. E., Squires, J. H., Clarke Brown, K. & Horowitz, M. (2015). The State of Preschool 2014: State Preschool Yearbook. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research.Google Scholar
Barnett, W. S., Jung, K., Youn, M., & Frede, E. C. (2013). Abbott Preschool program longitudinal effects study: Fifth grade follow-up. New Brunswick, NJ: National Institute for Early Education Research, Rutgers University.Google Scholar
Belway, S., Durán, M. & Spielberg, L. (2013). State Laws on Family Engagement in Education. Alexandria, VA: National PTA.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L. (2011). Getting in Sync: Revamping Licensing and Preparation for Teachers in Pre-K, Kindergarten and the Early Grades. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L., McCann, C., Williams, C. & Guernsey, L. (2014). Beyond Subprime Learning: Accelerating Progress in Early Education. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Bornfreund, L., Cook, S., Lieberman, A. & Williams, C. (2015, November).Scan of Birth-through-Third Grade Policies with a Focus on Literacy (title). Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Campbell, F. A., Ramey, C. T., Pungello, E.Sparling, J., & Miller-Johnson, S. (2002). Early childhood education: Young adult outcomes from the Abecedarian Project. Applied Developmental Science, 6(1), 42–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cannon, J., Jacknowitz, A. & Painter, G. (2011). The effect of attending full-day kindergarten on English learner students. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 30(2), 297–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chetty, R., Friedman, J. N. & Rockoff, J. E. (2013). Measuring the Impacts of Teachers II: Teacher Value-Added and Student Outcomes in Adulthood. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning (CASEL). (2014). Identifying K–12 standards for SEL in all 50 states.
Durlak, J. A., Weissberg, R. P., Dymnicki, A. B., Taylor, R. D. & Schellinger, K. B. (2011). The impact of enhancing students’ social and emotional learning: a meta-analysis of school-based universal interventions. Child Development, 82(1), 405–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Early Childhood Data Collaborative. (2014, February). 2013 State of States’ Early Childhood Data Systems. Washington, DC: ECDC.
Fernald, A., Marchman, V. A. & Weisleder, A. (2013). SES differences in language processing skill and vocabulary are evident at 18 months. Developmental Science, 16, 234–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graves, B. (2006). PK–3: What Is It and How Do We Know It Works?New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
Guernsey, L., Bornfreund, L., McCann, C. & Williams, C. (2014). Subprime Learning: Early Education in America Since the Great Recession. Washington, DC: New America.Google Scholar
Hart, B. & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful Differences in the Everyday Experience of Young American Children. Baltimore, MD: P. H. Brookes.Google Scholar
Hirsch Jr., E. D., Apple, M. W. & Rochester, J. M. (2005). Education Reform and Content: The Long View. Brookings Papers on Education Policy, No. 8 (pp. 175–207). Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Jimerson, S. R. (2001). Meta-analysis of grade retention research: Implications for practice in the 21st century. School Psychology Review, 30(3), 420–437.Google Scholar
Kagan, S. L. & Neuman, M. J. (1998, March). Lessons from three decades of transition researchThe Elementary School Journal, 98(4), 365–379.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kauerz, K. & Coffman, J. (2013, March). Framework for Planning, Implementing, and Evaluating Pre-K–3rd Grade Approaches. Seattle, WA: College of Education, Univ. of Washington.Google Scholar
Lesaux, N. K. (2010). Turning the Page: Refocusing Massachusetts for Reading Success: Strategies for Improving Children’s Language and Literacy Development, Birth to Age 9. Boston, MA: Strategies for Children.Google Scholar
Lesaux, N. K. (2013). PreK–3rd: Getting Literacy Instruction Right. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
Manship, K., Farber, J., Smith, C., & Drummond, K. (2016). Case studies of schools implementing early elementary strategies: Preschool through third grade alignment and differentiated instruction. Washington, DC: U. S. Department of Education, Office of Planning, Evaluation and Policy Development (Prepared by the American Institutes for Research, Washington, DC).Google Scholar
Meyer, L. A., Gersten, R. M. & Gutkin, J. (1983, November). Direct instruction: a project follow through success story in an inner-city school. The Elementary School Journal, 84(2), 241–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millard, M. (2015). State Funding Mechanisms for English Language Learners. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Murnane, R. J. & Steele, J. L. (2007). What is the problem? The challenge of providing effective teachers for all children. The Future of Children, 17(1), 15–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
NACCRRA (Now Child Care Aware). (2013). We Can Do Better: State Child Care Center Licensing, 2013 Update. Arlington, VA.
National Association for the Education of Young Children. (2014). State Profiles: Early Childhood Teacher Certification.
National Association of Elementary School Principals. (2014). Leading PreK–3 learning Communities: Competencies for Effective Principal Practice. Alexandria, VA.
National Center for Educational Statistics. (2013). A First Look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading: National Assessment of Educational Progress at Grades 4 and 8. Washington, DC: US Department of Education.
National Conference of State Legislatures. (2015, April 24). Funding Pre-K through the school funding formula.
National Council on Teacher Quality. (2014, January). 2013 State Teacher Policy Yearbook: National Summary. Washington, DC: NCTQ.
National Governors Association. (2013). Leading for Early Success: Building School Principals’ Capacity to Lead High-Quality Early Education. Washington, DC: NGA.
US Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families. (2010, January). Head Start Impact Study. Final Report. Washington, DC.
Reynolds, A. J. (2000). Success in early intervention: The Chicago Child-Parent Centers and youth through age 15. Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press (Reprinted 2012).Google Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Richardson, B. A., Hayakawa, M., Englund, M. M., & Ou, S. (2016a). Multi-site expansion of an early childhood intervention and school readiness. Pediatrics, 138(1). doi: e20154587.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Temple, J. A., White, B. A., Ou, S., & Robertson, D. L. (2011). Age-26 cost-benefit analysis of the Child-Parent Center education program.Child Development, 82, 782–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reynolds, A. J., Hayakawa, M, Candee, A. J., Englund, M. M. (2016b). CPC P-3 Program Manual: Child-Parent Center Preschool-3rd Grade Program. Minneapolis: Human Capital Research Collaborative, University of Minnesota.Google Scholar
Snow, C. E. & Van Hemel, S. B. (Eds.) (2008). Early Childhood Assessment: Why, What, and How. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Sullivan, L. M. (1971). Let us not underestimate the children. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foreman.Google Scholar
Thomas, W. P. & Collier, V. P. (2002). A National Study of School Effectiveness for Language Minority Students’ Long-Term Academic Achievement. Santa Cruz, CA: Center for Research on Education, Diversity and Excellence.Google Scholar
Weisberg, D. (2009). The Widget Effect: Our National Failure to Acknowledge and Act on Differences in Teacher Effectiveness. Brooklyn, NY: The New Teacher Project.Google Scholar
Workman, E. (2013, March). Inequalities at the Starting Line: State Kindergarten Policies. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Workman, E. (2014, December). Third-Grade Reading Policies. Denver, CO: Education Commission of the States.Google Scholar
Yoshikawa, H., Weiland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J. et al. (2013, October). Investing in Our Future: The Evidence Base on Preschool Education. New York, NY: Foundation for Child Development.Google Scholar
Save book to Kindle
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure email@example.com
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.