Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-7479d7b7d-qs9v7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-13T06:31:19.620Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

4 - An interactional approach to social influence in computer-mediated communication

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 October 2011

Zachary Birchmeier
Miami University
Beth Dietz-Uhler
Miami University
Garold Stasser
Miami University
Get access


Social interaction leads – online as much as offline – to mutual, more or less equal social influence of the interacting parties on each other. Internet users send out information, summaries of subjective experiences, and opinions using communication tools. Recipients acquire unconsciously new insights or strive to learn or form an opinion about a topic. Research studying the facilitating and hindering factors for such media-based social influence has a long-standing history (for a summary of the early work see Williams, 1977). Nonetheless, the interplay between personality characteristics and media attributes as preconditions of social influence has hardly received any attention yet. Therefore, the current chapter will apply interactionism (Endler and Magnusson, 1976) to online social influence. The combination of personal and situational variables is relevant in the context of new communication media as in any other context, because individuals may respond differently to the specific situational conditions provided by computer-mediated communication (CMC). (For initial evidence see Amichai-Hamburger et al., 2002; Cress, 2005; Guadagno and Cialdini, 2002; Hertel et al., 2008; Sassenberg et al., 2005.) Hence, considering individual differences for the prediction of media effects will allow more precise predictions about the impact of CMC on social influence.

In this chapter, different types of social influence will be introduced and the features of CMC that are relevant for social influence will be discussed. Afterwards, the research on these types of social influence in CMC will be reviewed. This review serves two purposes. First, it will show that almost all existing research in this domain has focused on the impact of situational characteristics that either (a) are inherent in the technology (e.g., few social context cues) or (b) result from the social setting in which CMC takes place (e.g., the impact of group norms on a person's attitudes). Second, it will outline how the moderation of social influence processes by communication media characteristics is best explained by the interactionist approach that includes inter-individual differences (e.g., personality traits). Before this approach is described, the few studies that take into account the moderating impact of inter-individual differences between users on the effects of situational characteristics (i.e., personality traits or cognitive styles) will be summarized. (For a framework model putting forward a similar argument for CMC research in general see Joinson, 2003.)

Strategic Uses of Social Technology
An Interactive Perspective of Social Psychology
, pp. 63 - 83
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Allen, V. L. 1965 Situational factors in conformityBerkowitz, L.Advances in experimental social psychology133New YorkAcademic PressGoogle Scholar
Amichai-Hamburger, Y. 2005 Personality and the internetAmichai-Hamburger, Y.The social net: The social psychology of the internet27OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Amichai-Hamburger, Y.Wainapel, G.Fox, S. 2002 “On the internet no one knows I’m an introvert”: Extraversion, neuroticism, and internet interactionCyberPsychology & Behavior 2 125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bushman, B. J. 1995 Moderating role of trait aggressiveness in the effects of violent media on aggressionJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 69 950CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinnirella, M.Green, B. 2007 Does “cyber-conformity” vary cross-culturally? Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformityComputers in Human Behavior 23 2011CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cress, U. 2005 Ambivalent effect of member portraits in virtual groupsJournal of Computer-Assisted Learning 21 281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. 1957 The two disciplines of scientific psychologyAmerican Psychologist 12 671CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deutsch, M.Gerard, H. B. 1955 A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgementJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 51 629Google ScholarPubMed
Douglas, K. M.McGarty, C. 2001 Identifiability and self-presentation: Computer-mediated communication and intergroup interactionBritish Journal of Social Psychology 40 399CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Douglas, K. M.McGarty, C. 2002 Internet identifiability and beyond: A model of the effects of identifiability on communicative behaviorGroup Dynamics 6 17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dubrovsky, V. J.Kiesler, S.Sethna, B. N. 1991 The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision-making groupsHuman Computer Interaction 6 119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egloff, B.Hock, M. 2001 31
Endler, N. S.Magnusson, D. 1976 Toward an interactional psychology of personalityPsychological Bulletin 83 956CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Epley, N.Kruger, J. 2005 When what you type isn't what they read: The perseverance of stereotypes and expectancies over e-mailJournal of Experimental Social Psychology414CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenigstein, A.Scheier, M. R.Buss, A. H. 1975 Public and private self-consciousness: Assessment and theoryJournal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 43 522CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franke, G. H. 1997 Über die Möglichkeiten der computerunterstützten Darbietung beim revidierten Freiburger Persönlichkeitsinventar: Zwei experimentelle Studien [Computer-based administration of the Freiburg Personality Inventory: Two experimental studies]Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie 44 332Google Scholar
Froming, W. J.Carver, C. S. 1981 Divergent influences of private and public self-consciousness in a compliance paradigmJournal of Research in Personality 15 159CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, F. X.Buunk, B. P. 1999 Individual differences in social comparison: Development of a scale of social comparison orientationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 76 129CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guadagno, R. E.Cialdini, R. B. 2002 Online persuasion: An examination of gender differences in computer-mediated interpersonal influenceGroup Dynamics 6 38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guéguen, N. 2002 Foot-in-the-door technique and computer-mediated communicationComputers in Human Behavior 18 11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hertel, G.Schroer, J.Batinic, B.Naumann, S. 2008 39
Hiltz, S. R.Johnson, K.Turoff, M. 1986 Experiments in group decision making: Communication process and outcome in face-to-face versus computerized conferencesHuman Communication Research 13 225CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huguet, P.Galvaing, M. P.Monteil, J. M.Dumas, F. 1999 Social presence effects in the Stroop task: Further evidence for an attentional view of social facilitationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 77 1011CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joinson, A. N. 2001 Self-disclosure in computer-mediated communication: The role of self-awareness and visual anonymityEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 31 177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joinson, A. N. 2003 Understanding the psychology of internet behaviour: Virtual worlds, real livesBasingstoke: Palgrave MacmillanGoogle Scholar
Kimmerle, J.Cress, U. 2008 Group awareness and self-presentation in computer-supported information exchangeInternational Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning 3 85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimmerle, J.Cress, U.Hesse, F. W. 2007 An interactional perspective on group awareness: A tool alleviating the information-exchange dilemma (for everybody?)International Journal of Human–Computer Studies 65 899CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M.Spears, R. 1991 Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation and group decision makingInternational Journal of Man–Machine Studies 39 283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lea, M.Spears, Groot, D. 2001 Knowing me, knowing you: Anonymity effects on social identity processes within groupsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, E.-J.Nass, C. 2002 Experimental tests of normative group influence and representation effects in computer-mediated communicationHuman Communication Research 28 349Google Scholar
Lewin, K. 1936 Principles of topological psychologyNew YorkMcGraw-HillCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, D.Peracchio, L. Juan, M. D. 2003 The impact of language and congruity on persuasion in multicultural E-marketingJournal of Consumer Psychology 13 41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, K.Zanna, M. P. 1988 The impact of computer-mediated communication on self-awarenessComputers in Human Behavior 4 221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Matheson, K.Zanna, M. P. 1989 Persuasion as a function of self-awareness in computer-mediated communicationSocial Behaviour 4 99Google Scholar
McKenna, K. Y. A.Bargh, J. A. 2000 Plan 9 from cyberspace: The implications of the internet for personality and social psychologyPersonality and Social Psychology Review 4 57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mischel, W.Shoda, Y. 1995 A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structurePsychological Review 102 246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Postmes, T.Spears, R. 1998 Deindividuation and anti-normative behaviour: A meta-analysisPsychological Bulletin 123 238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postmes, T.Spears, R. 2000 Refining the cognitive redefinition of the group: Deindividuation effects in common bond vs. common identity groupsPostmes, T.Spears, R.Lea, M.Reicher, S.Side issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups31AmsterdamKNAWGoogle Scholar
Postmes, T.Spears, R. 2002 Behavior online: Does anonymous computer communication reduce gender inequalityPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 1073CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postmes, T.Spears, R.Lea, M. 1998 Breaching or building social boundaries? SIDE-effects of computer mediated communicationCommunication Research 25 689CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postmes, T.Spears, R.Lea, M. 2002 Intergroup differentiation in computer-mediated communication: Effects of depersonalisationGroup Dynamics 6 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Postmes, T.Spears, R.Sakhel, Groot, D. 2001 Social influence in computer-mediated communication: The effects of anonymity on group behaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 27 1243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, D. A.Miller, D. T.Lightdale, J. R. 1994 Asymmetries in attachments to groups and to their members: Distinguishing between common-identity and common-bond groupsPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 20 484CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rains, S. A. 2005 Leveling the organizational playing field – virtuallyCommunication Research 32 193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reicher, S. D.Spears, R.Postmes, T. 1995 A social identity model of deindividuation phenomenaEuropean Review of Social Psychology 6 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Renner, K.-H.Schütz, A.Machilek, F. 2005 Internet und Persönlichkeit [Internet and personality]GöttingenHogrefe
Robins, R. W.John, O. P. 1997 Effects of visual perspective and narcissism on self-perception: Is seeing believingPsychological Science 8 37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K. 2002 Common bond and common identity groups on the internet: Attachment and normative behavior in on-topic and off-topic chatsGroup Dynamics 6 27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Boos, M. 2003 Attitude change in computer-mediated communication: Effects of anonymity and category normsGroup Processes & Intergroup Relations 6 405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Boos, M.Klapproth, F. 2001 Wissen und Problemlösekompetenz: Der Einfluss von Expertise auf den Informationsaustausch in computervermittelter Kommunikation [Knowledge and problem-solving competence: The influence of expertise on information exchange in computer-mediated communication]Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie 32 45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Jonas, K. J. 2007 Attitude change and social influence on the netJoinson, A. N.McKenna, K. Y. A.Postmes, T.Reips, U.-D.The Oxford handbook of internet psychology273OxfordOxford University PressGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Kreutz, S. 2002 Online research and anonymityBatinic, B.Reips, U.-D.Bosnjak, M.Online social sciences213SeattleHogrefe and HuberGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Postmes, T. 2002 Cognitive and strategic processes in small groups: Effects of anonymity of the self and anonymity of the group on social influenceBritish Journal of Social Psychology 41 463CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassenberg, K.Rabung, S.Boos, M. 2005 Attitude change in face to face and computer-mediated communication: Private self-awareness as mediator and moderatorEuropean Journal of Social Psychology 35 621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheier, M. F. 1980 Effects of public and private self-consciousness on the public expression of personal beliefsJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 39 514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmitt, M.Eid, M.Maes, J. 2003 Synergistic person x situation interaction in distributed justice behaviorPersonality and Social Psychology Bulletin 29 141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smilowitz, M.Compton, D. C.Flint, L. 1988 The effects of computer mediated communication on an individual's judgement: A study based on the methods of Asch's social influence experimentComputers in Human Behavior 4 311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R.Lea, M. 1992
Spears, RLea, M 1994 Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communicationCommunication Research 21 427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R.Lea, M.Corneliussen, R. A.Postmes, T.ten Haar, W. 2002 Computer-mediated communication as a channel for social resistance: The strategic side of SIDESmall Group Research 33 555CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R.Lea, M.Lee, S. 1990 De-individuation and group polarization in computer-mediated communicationsBritish Journal of Social Psychology 29 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spears, R.Postmes, T.Lea, M.Watt, S. E. 2001 A SIDE view of social influenceForgas, J. P.Williams, K. D.Social influence: Direct and indirect processes331New YorkPsychology PressGoogle Scholar
Spielberger, C. D. 1972 Anxiety: Current trends in theory and researchNew YorkAcademic Press
Sproull, L.Kiesler, S. 1986 Reducing social context cues: Electronic mail in organizational communicationManagement Science1492CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tajfel, H.Turner, J. C. 1979 An integrative theory of intergroup conflictAustin, W. G.Worchel, S.The social psychology of intergroup relations33Monterey, CABrooks/ColeGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C. 1991 Social influenceMilton KeynesOpen University PressGoogle Scholar
Turner, J. C.Hogg, M. A.Oakes, P. J.Reicher, S. D.Wetherell, M. S. 1987 Rediscovering the social group: A self-categorization theoryOxfordBlackwellGoogle Scholar
Van Lange, P. A. M. 1999 The pursuit of joint outcomes and equality in outcomes: An integrative model of social value orientationJournal of Personality and Social Psychology337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldzus, S.Schubert, T. 2000 Group norm and category norm in anonymous situations: Two sources of social influencePostmes, T.Spears, R.Lea, M.Reicher, S.Side issues centre stage: Recent developments in studies of de-individuation in groups31AmsterdamKNAWGoogle Scholar
Walther, J. B. 1996 Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interactionCommunication Research 23 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Webb, W. M.Marsh, K. L.Schneiderman, W.Davis, B. 1989 Interaction between self-monitoring and manipulated states of self-awarenessJournal of Personality and Social Psychology 56 70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, E. 1977 Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A reviewPsychological Bulletin 84 963CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wood, W. 1999 Motives and modes of processing in the social influence of groupsChaiken, S.Trope, Y.Dual-process theories in social psychology547New YorkGuilfordGoogle Scholar
Zigurs, M. I.Poole, S.DeSanctis, G. L. 1988 A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision makingMIS Quarterly 12 625CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats