Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-6b989bf9dc-mbg9n Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-12T22:32:44.863Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 August 2023

Jonas Tinius
Affiliation:
Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
State of the Arts
An Ethnography of German Theatre and Migration
, pp. 204 - 241
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2023

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abu-Lughod, Lila. 1985. Veiled Sentiments: Honour and Poetry in a Bedouin Society. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Abu-Lughod, Lila. 2002. ‘Do Muslim Women Really Need Saving? Anthropological Reflections on Cultural Relativism and Its Others’. American Anthropologist 104 (3): 783790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 1955. ‘Theater, Oper, Bürgertum’, in: Vietta, Egon. Ed. 5. Darmstädter Gespräch. Theater. Darmstadt: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt, pp. 119134.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. 2003 [1970]. Ästhetische Theorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Horkheimer, Max. 2002 [1944]. The Dialectics of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. Ed. Schmid Noerr, Gunzelin. Trans. Edmund Jephcott. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W. and Richter, Gerhard. 2002 [1969]. ‘Who’s Afraid of the Ivory Tower? A Conversation with Theodor W. Adorno’. Monatshefte 94 (1): 1023.Google Scholar
Adorno, Theodor W., Benjamin, Walter, Bloch, Ernst, Brecht, Bertolt, and Lukács, Georg. 2007 [1977]. Aesthetics and Politics. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2011. Performance and Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Al-Mohammad, Hatdar. 2015. ‘We Can Do without the Good’. Critique of Anthropology 35 (4): 445450.Google Scholar
Aly, Ramy M. K. 2015. Becoming Arab in London: Performativity and the Undoing of Identity. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Aly, Götz. 2021. Das Prachtboot. Wie Deutsche die Kunstschätze der Südsee raubten. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer Verlag.Google Scholar
Anderson, Amanda. 2001. The Powers of Distance: Cosmopolitanism and the Cultivation of Detachment. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Anscombe, G. E. M. 1958. ‘Modern Moral Philosophy’. Philosophy 33 (124): 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Antze, Paul. 2010. ‘On the Pragmatics of Empathy in the Neurodiversity Movement’, in: Lambek, Michael. Ed. Ordinary Ethics. Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press, pp. 310327.Google Scholar
Appadurai, Arjun. 1996. Modernity at Large. Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. London and Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Aquilina, Stefan and Pitches, Jonathan. Eds. 2017. Stanislavsky in the World: The System and Its Transformations across Continents. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Archer, Margaret S. 2007. Making Our Way through the World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Artaud, Antonin. 1958 [1938]. Theatre and Its Double. Trans. Mary Caroline Richards. New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
Asad, Talal. 1986. The Idea of an Anthropology of Islam. Occasional Papers Series, Center for Contemporary Arab Studies. Washington, DC: Georgetown University.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Paul. 2004. ‘Performance and Rehearsal: The Ethnographer at the Opera’, in: Clive Seal, Giampetro Gobo, Gubbium, Jaber, and Silverman, David. Eds. Qualitative Research Practice. London: Sage, pp. 94106.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David 1980. ‘On the Impact of Revenue Subsidies on Repertory Theatre Policy’. Journal of Cultural Economics 4: 917.Google Scholar
Austin, John Langshaw 1962. How to Do Things with Words. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bab, Julius. 1931. Das Theater im Lichte der Soziologie. Stuttgart: Ferdinand Enke Verlag.Google Scholar
Bachmann, Michael, Kreuder, Friedemann, Pfahl, Julia, and Volz, Dorothea. Eds. 2012. Theater und Subjektkonstitution. Theatrale Praktiken zwischen Affirmation und Subversion. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Baecker, Dirk. 2013a. Beobachter unter sich – Eine Kulturtheorie. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Baecker, Dirk. 2013b. Wozu Theater? Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Baert, Patrick. 2015. The Existentialist Moment: The Rise of Sartre as a Public Intellectual. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Baert, Patrick and Morgan, Marcus. 2015. Conflict in the Academy: A Study in the Sociology of Intellectuals. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bakke, Gretchen and Peterson, Marina. Eds. 2017. Between Matter and Method. Encounters in Art and Anthropology. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Balet, Leo and Gerhard, E.. 1972. Die Verbürgerlichung der deuschen Kunst, Literatur und Musik im 18. Jahrhundert. Ed. Mattenklott, Gert. Frankfurt am Main: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Balme, Christopher B. 2008. The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, Eugenio. 1987. ‘The Etymological Intellectual’. New Theatre Quarterly 3 (10): 188191.Google Scholar
Barba, Eugenio. 2002. ‘The Essence of Theatre’. The Drama Review: TDR 46 (3): 1230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barba, Eugenio and Fowler, Richard. 1982. ‘Theatre Anthropology’. The Drama Review: TDR 26 (2): 532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barber, Karin. 2000. The Generation of Plays: Yorùbá Popular Life in Theater. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Barber, Karin. 2007. The Anthropology of Texts, Persons and Publics: Oral and Written Culture in Africa and Beyond. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Barker, Joshua et al. Eds. 2013. Figures of Southeast Asian Modernity. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
Barnes, Barry. 1995. The Elements of Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Barnett, David. 2015a. Brecht in Practice: Theatre, Theory and Performance. London: Bloomsbury/Methuen.Google Scholar
Barnett, David. 2015b. A History of the Berliner Ensemble. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, David. 2021. ‘“Brecht in Practice”: Critical Reflections on Staging Drama Dialectically’. Contemporary Theatre Review 31 (3): 266285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barth, Frederik, Parkin, Robert, Gingrich, Andre, and Silverman, Sydel. 2005. One Discipline, Four Ways: British, German, French and American Anthropology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartula, Malgorszata and Schroer, Stefan. 2001. Über Improvisation. Neun Gespräche mit Roberto Ciulli. Duisburg: Trikont.Google Scholar
Baumgarten, Alexander. 1954 [1735]. Reflections on Poetry: Alexander Gottlieb Baumgarten’s Meditationes Philosophicae de Nonnullis ad Poema Pertinentibus. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bausinger, Hermann. 1961. Volkskultur in der technischen Welt. Stuttgart: W. Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Bayly, Susan. 2004. ‘Vietnamese Intellectuals in Revolutionary and Postcolonial Times’. Critique of Anthropology 24 (3): 320344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bayly, Susan. 2014. ‘How to Forge a Creative Student-Citizen: Achieving the Positive in Today’s Vietnam’. Modern Asian Studies 48 (3): 493523.Google Scholar
Becker, Howard et al. Eds. 2006. Art from Start to Finish: Jazz, Painting, and Other Improvisation. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Beeman, William O. 1993. ‘The Anthropology of Theatre and Spectacle’. Annual Review of Anthropology 22: 369393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beiser, Frederick C. 2006. The Romantic Imperative: The Concept of Early German Romanticism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Belfiore, Eleonora and Bennett, Oliver. Eds. 2008. The Social Impact of the Arts: An Intellectual History. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bell, Joshua A. 2012. ‘Museums as Relational Entities: The Politics and Poetics of Heritage’. Reviews in Anthropology 41 (1): 7092.Google Scholar
Bendix, Regina. 1989. Backstage Domains: Playing William Tell in Two Swiss Communities. Berne: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 1964 [1930]. ‘Theorien des deutschen Faschismus. Zu der Sammelschrift “Krieg und Krieger”’. Das Argument 30 (1964): 129137.Google Scholar
Benjamin, Walter. 2000 [1928]. Ursprung des deutschen Trauerspiels. Ed. Tiedemann, Rolf. Rev. edn. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Benner, Dietrich. 2003. Wilhelm von Humboldts Bildungstheorie. Weinheim: Juventa.Google Scholar
Bentley, Eric. 1965. The Life of Drama. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Berger, Stefan 2004. Inventing the Nation: Germany. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Berghahn, Volker and Young, Brigitte. 2013. ‘Reflections on Werner Bonefeld’s “Freedom and the Strong State: On German Ordoliberalism” and the Continuing Importance of the Ideas of Ordoliberalism to Understand Germany’s (Contested) Role in Resolving the Eurozone Crisis’. New Political Economy 18 (5): 768778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bermúdez, Jose Luis and Gardner, Sebastian. Eds. 2003. Art and Morality. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bernstein, Jay M. 2001. Adorno. Disenchantment and Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bertram, Georg W. 2010. ‘Improvisation und Normativität’, in: Bormann, Hans-Friedrich, Brandstetter, Gabriele, and Matzke, Annemarie. Eds. Improvisieren. Paradoxien des Unvorhersehbaren. Kunst-Medien-Praxis. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 2139.Google Scholar
Bianchini, Franco and Parkinson, Michael. Eds. 1993. Cultural Policy and Urban Regeneration: The West European Experience. Manchester and New York: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2004. ‘Antagonism and Relational Aesthetics’. October 110 (Fall): 5179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2006. ‘The Social Turn: Collaboration and Its Discontents’. Artforum 44 (6): 178183.Google Scholar
Bishop, Claire. 2012. Artificial Hells: Participatory Art and the Politics of Spectatorship. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Blackledge, Paul and Knight, Kelvin. 2011. Virtue and Politics: Alasdair MacIntyre’s Revolutionary Aristotelianism. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Blanes, Ruy, Maskens, Maïté, Flynn, Alex, and Tinius, Jonas. 2016. ‘Micro-Utopias: Anthropological Perspectives on Art, Creativity, and Relationality’. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia/Journal of Art and Anthropology 5 (1): 520.Google Scholar
Bock, Jan-Jonathan 2016. ‘Approaching Utopia Pragmatically: Artistic Spaces and Community-Making in Post-earthquake L’Aquila’. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia 5 (1): 97115.Google Scholar
Bock, Jan-Jonathan and Macdonald, Sharon. Eds. 2019. Refugees Welcome? Differences and Diversity in a Changing Germany. Oxford and New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Bodenhorn, Barbara, Holbraad, Martin, and Laidlaw, James. Eds. 2018. ‘Introduction. Freedom, Creativity, and Decision in Recovering the Human Subject’, in: Recovering the Human Subject. Freedom, Creativity, and Decision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123.Google Scholar
Boellstorff, Tom. 2008. Coming of Age in Second Life. An Anthropologist Explores the Virtually Human. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Boenisch, Peter M. 2015. The Thinking of Regie. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Bogusz, Tanja. 2007. Institution und Utopie. Ost-West-Transformationen an der Berliner Volksbühne. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Bohannan, Laura. 1966. ‘Shakespeare in the Bush’. Natural History 75: 2833.Google Scholar
Bojadžijev, Manuela and Römhild, Regina. 2014. ‘Was kommt nach dem “trans- national turn”? Perspektiven für eine kritische Migrationsforschung’. Berliner Blätter. Ethnographische und Ethnologische Beiträge 65: 1024.Google Scholar
Bollenbeck, Georg. 1996. Bildung und Kultur. Glanz und Elend eines deutschen Deutungsmusters. Frankfurt and Leipzig: Insel.Google Scholar
Boltanski, Luc and Chiapello, Ève. 2007 [1999]. The New Spirit of Capitalism. Trans. Gregory Elliott. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bonefeld, Werner 2013. ‘On the Strong Liberal State: Beyond Berghahn and Young’. New Political Economy 18 (5): 770783.Google Scholar
Borchardt, Knut 1991. Perspectives on Modern German Economic History and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina. 1995. Rationalizing Culture: IRCAM, Boulez, and the Institutionalization of the Musical Avant-Garde. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina. 2004. Uncertain Vision: Birt, Dyke and the Reinvention of the BBC. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Born, Georgina. 2010. ‘The Social and the Aesthetic: For a Post-Bourdieuian Theory of Cultural Production’. Cultural Sociology 4 (2): 171208.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. 1991. After the Wall: East Meets West in the New Berlin. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Borneman, John. 1992. Belonging in the Two Berlins: Kin, State, Nation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Boswell, James. 1929 [1770]. On the Profession of a Player: Three Essays. London: E. Mathews & Marrot.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1977 [1972]. Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. Distinction: A Social Critique of the Judgement of Taste. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1988 [1984]. Homo Academicus. Trans. Peter Collier. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1990 [1980]. The Logic of Practice. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1992. Les Règles de l’Art. Genèse et structure du champ littéraire. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 1993. The Field of Cultural Production: Essays on Art and Literature. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Bourdieu, Pierre. 2013. Manet, une révolution symbolique. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 1999. Formes de vie. L’art moderne et l’invention de soi. Paris: Denoël.Google Scholar
Bourriaud, Nicolas. 2002 [1998]. Relational Aesthetics. Trans. Simon Pleasance and Fronza Woods. Paris: Presses du réel.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2001. ‘Foucault in the Bush: The Social Life of Post-Structuralist Theory in East Berlin’s Prenzlauer Berg’. Ethnos 66 (2): 207236.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2003a. ‘Censorship as a Vocation: The Institutions, Practices, and Cultural Logic of Media Control in the German Democratic Republic’. Society for Comparative Study of Society and History 45 (3): 511545.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2003b. ‘The Medium of Foucault in Anthropology’. Minnesota Review 58–60: 265272.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2005. Spirit and System: Media, Intellectuals, and the Dialectic in Modern German Culture. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2008. ‘Thinking through the Anthropology of Experts’. Anthropology in Action 15 (2): 3846.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2013a. ‘Simply the Best: Parody and Political Sincerity’. American Ethnologist 40 (2): 276284.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2013b. The Life Informatic: Newsmaking in the Digital Era. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic. 2015. ‘Reflexivity Reloaded: From Anthropology of Intellectuals to Critique of Method to Studying Sideways’, in: Hylland Eriksen, Thomas, Garsten, Christina, and Randeria, Shalini. Eds. Anthropology Now and Next: Essays in Honour of Ulf Hannerz. New York and Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 91110.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic and Lomnitz, Claudio. 2005. ‘Intellectuals and Nationalism: Anthropological Engagements’. Annual Review of Anthropology 34: 105120.Google Scholar
Boyer, Dominic and Marcus, George E.. 2015. ‘Introduction: New Methodologies for a Transformed Discipline’, in: Dominic Boyer, James Faubion, George E. Marcus. Eds. Theory Can Be More than It Used to Be. Learning Anthropology’s Method in a Time of Transition. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, pp. 112.Google Scholar
Boyer, Pascal 1990. Tradition as Truth and Communication. A Cognitive Description of Traditional Discourse. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
BpB (Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung). 2014. ‘Öffentliche Ausgaben für Kultur. Bundezentrale für politische Bildung. www.bpb.de/nachschlagen/zahlen-und-fakten/soziale-situation-in-deutschland/61887/ausgaben-fuer-kultur (last accessed 28 August 2022).Google Scholar
Bradley, Laura. 2010. Cooperation and Conflict: GDR Theatre Censorship, 1961–1989. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brauneck, Manfred. 2018. Die Deutschen und ihr Theater. Kleine Geschichte der »moralischen Anstalt« – oder: Ist das Theater überfordert? Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 2014 [1948]. ‘Short Organon for the Theatre’, in: Silberman, Marc, Giles, Steve, and Kohn, Tom. Eds. Brecht on Theatre. 3rd Edn. London: Bloomsbury, pp. 229255.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 1964. Brecht on Theatre: The Development of an Aesthetic. Translated and edited by Willett, John. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Brecht, Bertolt. 1987 [1976]. Poems, 1913–1956. 2nd Edn. Ed. Willett, John and Mannheim, Karl with the co-operation of Erich Fried. London and New York: Methuen.Google Scholar
Breed, Ananda. 2013. Performing the Nation: Genocide, Justice, and Reconciliation. Chicago, IL: Seagull Press.Google Scholar
Breed, Ananda and Prentki, Tim. Eds. 2018. Performance and Civic Engagement. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Brogi, Susanna, Freier, Carolin, Freier-Otten, Ulf, and Hartosch, Katja. Eds. 2013. Repräsentationen von Arbeit. Transdisziplinäre Analysen und künstlerische Produktionen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Bruford, Walter Horace. 1950. Theatre, Drama and Audience in Goethe’s Germany. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Bruford, Walter Horace. 1975. The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation: ‘Bildung’ from Humboldt to Thomas Mann. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Buchmann, Sabeth, Lafer, Ilse, and Ruhm, Constanze. Eds. 2016. Putting Rehearsals to the Test. Practices of Rehearsal in Fine Arts, Film, Theatre, Theory, and Politics. Berlin: Sternberg.Google Scholar
Bühnenwatch. n.d. ‘About us’. www.facebook.com/buehnenwatch (last accessed, 29 August 2022)Google Scholar
Buchmann, Sabeth, Lafer, Ilse, and Ruhm, Constanze. Eds. 2013. Online reference currently disabled, see Terheyden, Henrike. 2013., Bühnenwatch demonstrierte beim Public Viewing der „Johanna“ Inszenierung‘. https://theatertreffen-blog.de/blog/buhnenwatch-demonstrierte-beim-public-viewing-der-johanna-inszenierung/ (last accessed, 29 August 2022).Google Scholar
Bürger, Peter. 1984 [1974]. Theory of the Avant-Garde. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
Burke, Kenneth. 1969. A Grammar of Motives. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burns, Rob and van der Will, Wilfried. 2003. ‘German Cultural Policy: An Overview’. International Journal of Cultural Policy 9 (2): 133152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1990. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 1993. Bodies That Matter: On the Discursive Limits of Sex. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2015. Notes toward a Performative Theory of Assembly. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Camfield, Laura. 2015. ‘“Character Matters”: How Do Measures of Non-cognitive Skills Shape Understandings of Social Mobility in the Global North and South?Social Anthropology 23: 6879.Google Scholar
Canclini, Néstor García. 2014. Art beyond Itself: Anthropology for a Society without a Storyline. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2011. ‘Our Division of the Universe: Making a Space for the Non-Political in the Anthropology of Politics’. Current Anthropology 52 (3): 309334.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei. 2016. ‘We Have Never Been Pluralist: On Lateral and Frontal Comparisons in the Ontological Turn’, in: Charbonnier, Pierre, Salmon, Gildas, and Skafish, Peter. Eds. Comparative Metaphysics: Ontology after Anthropology. London: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 85106.Google Scholar
Candea, Matei, Cook, Joanna, Trundle, Catherin, and Yarrow, Thomas. 2015. ‘Introduction: Reconsidering Detachment’, in: Matei Candea, Joanna Cook, Trundle, Catherine, and Yarrow, Thomas. Eds. Detachment: Essays on the Limits of Relational Thinking. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Carlson, Marvin 2001. The Haunted Stage: The Theatre as Memory Machine. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlson, Marvin 2003. Performance: A Critical Introduction. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Chakrabarty, Dipesh. 2007 [2000]. Provincializing Europe. Postcolonial Thought and Historical Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Chin, Rita 2007. The Guest Worker Question in Postwar Germany. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chua, Liana and Elliott, Mark. Eds. 2013. Distributed Objects: Meaning and Mattering after Gell. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Christely, Susan. 2013. ‘Spiegel der Zeit. 50 Jahre Theatertreffen’. 3Sat Online. 2 May 2013.Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto. 2006. ‘Her mit der Theaterpflicht’. Interview with Jörg Bartel and Jens Dirksen. NRZ. 28 November 2006.Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto. 2012. Interview. ‘Für Roberto Ciulli ist Theater Bildung, Unterhaltung und Erotik zugleich’. WAZ. 1 February 2012.Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto. 2013. ‘Staatspreis NRW für Roberto Ciulli. “Ich blicke auf die Welt wie ein Clown”’. Interview with Dorothee Krings. Rheinische Post, 20 November 2013.Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto and Schäfer, Helmut. n.d.a. ‘Das Modell’. www.theater-an-der-ruhr.de/konzeption/das-modell/ (last accessed, 26 August 2022).Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto and Schäfer, Helmut. n.d.b. ‘Ensemble’. www.theater-an-der-ruhr.de/ensemble/ (last accessed, 5 August 2022).Google Scholar
Ciulli, Roberto and Schäfer, Helmut. n.d.c. ‘Grundsatz International’. Subsection ‘Konzeption’. Website of the Theater an der Ruhr. Mülheim. www.theater-an-der-ruhr.de/en/programm/996-international (last accessed, 11 August 2022).Google Scholar
Clarke, Morgan 2014. ‘Cough Sweets and Angels: The Ordinary Ethics of the Extraordinary in Sufi Practice in Lebanon’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20: 407425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Classen, Ludger and Schütz, Erhard. Eds. 1986. ‘Nachwort’. Der Scheinwerfer. Ein Forum der NEUEN SACHLICHKEIT 1927–1933. Essen: Klartext.Google Scholar
Clifford, James. 1988. The Predicament of Culture: Twentieth-Century Ethnography, Literature, and Art. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Clifford, James and Marcus, George E.. Eds. 1986. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley, Los Angeles, and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Cohen-Cruz, Jan. 2010. Engaging Performance: Theatre as Call and Response. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Colbert, Soyica Diggs, Jones, Douglas A., and Vogel, Shane. Eds. 2020. Race and Performance after Repetition. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Combs-Schilling, Elaine. 1989. Sacred Performances: Islam, Sexuality and Sacrifice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight. 1985. ‘Performing as a Moral Act: Ethical Dimensions of the Ethnography of Performance’. Literature in Performance 5 (2): 113.Google Scholar
Conquergood, Dwight. 1989. ‘Poetics, Play, Process, and Power: The Performative Turn in Anthropology’. Text and Performance Quarterly 1: 8295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coote, Jeremy and Shelton, Anthony. Eds. 1992. Anthropology, Art, and Aesthetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Cornelsen, Dirk. 1986. ‘Für Sinti und Roma nichts. Romani Rose im Gespräch’. Frankfurter Rundschau, 15 January 1986.Google Scholar
Cornish, Matt, Woolf, Brandon, Brater, Enoch, and Taylor-Batty, Mark. Eds. 2019. Postdramatic Theatre and Form. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Corsin Jimenez, Alberto. 2007. The Anthropology of Organisations. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Cowan, Jane K. 1990. Dance and the Body Politic in Northern Greece. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craciun, Magda. 2017. ‘Anthropological Approaches to the Relationship between Aesthetics and Ethics’. World Art 7: 118.Google Scholar
Crehan, Kate. 2011. Community Art: An Anthropological Perspective. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Curtis, Robin and Fenner, Angelica. Eds. 2014. The Autobiographical Turn in Germanophone Documentary and Experimental Film. Rochester, NY: Camden House.Google Scholar
Czertok, Horacio. 2016. Theatre of Exile. Ed. Holbraad, Martin. Trans. Robert Elliot. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Daniel, Ute. 1995. Hoftheater. Zur Geschichte des Theaters und der Höfe im 18. und 19. Jahrhundert. Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2007. Life and Words: Violence and the Descent into the Ordinary. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2012. ‘Ordinary Ethics’, in: Fassin, Didier. Ed. A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, pp. 133149.Google Scholar
Das, Veena. 2014. ‘Ethics, the Householder’s Dilemma, and the Difficulty of Reality’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 4 (1): 487495.Google Scholar
Dave, Naisargi N. 2011. ‘Activism as Ethical Practice: Queer Politics in Contemporary India’. Cultural Dynamics 23: 320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dave, Naisargi N. 2012. Queer Activism in India: A Story in the Anthropology of Ethics. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Tracy C. 2003. ‘Theatricality and Civil Society’, in: Davis, Tracy C. and Postlewait, Thomas. Eds. Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 127155.Google Scholar
Davis, Tracy C. 2008. The Cambridge Companion to Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Tracy C. and Postlewait, Thomas. Eds. 2003. Theatricality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, Tracy C. and Rae, Paul. Eds. Forthcoming. The Cambridge Guide to Mixed Methods Research for Theatre and Performance Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
De la Fuente, Eduardo. 2007. ‘The “New Sociology of Art”: Putting Art Back into Social Sciences Approaches to the Arts’. Cultural Sociology 1 (3): 409425.Google Scholar
De la Fuente, Eduardo. 2010. ‘The Artwork Made Me Do It: Introduction to the New Sociology of Art’. Thesis Eleven 103 (1): 39.Google Scholar
DeMarrais, Elizabeth and Robb, John. 2013. ‘Art Makes Society: An Introductory Visual Essay’. World Art 3: 322.Google Scholar
Deck, Jan and Sieburg, Angelika. Eds. 2011. Politisch Theater Machen: Neue Artikulationsformen des Politischen in den darstellenden Künsten. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Deeb, Hadi Nicholas and Marcus, George E.. 2011. ‘In the Green Room: An Experiment in the Ethnographic Method at the WTO’. PoLAR 34 (1): 5176.Google Scholar
Dennis, David B. 2012. Inhumanities: Nazi Interpretations of Western Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Detje, Robin. 1992. ‘Menschen? Warum hier? Von Chemnitz nach Hoyerswerda. Das Roma-Theater Pralipe auf einer Tournee gegen die Gewalt’. Die Zeit 47 (49): 57.Google Scholar
Deutscher Bühnenverein. 1999. Theaterstatistik 1998/99. Cologne: Deutscher Bühnenverein.Google Scholar
Detje, Robin. 2015. Theaterstatistik 2013/2014. Cologne: Deutscher Bühnenverein.Google Scholar
Diderot, Denis. 1883 [1773]. The Paradox of Acting. Translated with Annotations. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
Diesselhorst, Sophie. 2015. ‘Die Demut des Theaters: Werden die Theater in der “Flüchtlingskrise” wieder wichtig?’, Nachtkritik.de, 5 October 2016.Google Scholar
Donkor, Dwight 2007. ‘Performance, Ethnography and the Radical Intervention of Dwight Conquergood’. Cultural Studies 21 (6): 821825.Google Scholar
Doris, John M. 2002. Lack of Character: Personality and Moral Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douglas, Mary. 1986. How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
Dreysse, Miriam and Malzacher, Florian. Eds. 2007. Rimini Protokoll. Experten des Alltags. Das Theater von Rimini Protokoll. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Duarte, Luiz Fernando Dias 2015. ‘Romanticism and Holism in the Anthropology of the West (Revising Bergson’s Paradox)’. Anthropological Theory 15 (2): 179199.Google Scholar
Dumke, Rolf H. 1990. ‘Reassessing the Wirtschaftswunder: Reconstruction and Postwar Growth in West Germany in an International Context’. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 52 (2): 451491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1970 [1966]. Homo Hierarchicus: An Essay on the Caste System. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dumont, Louis. 1994 [1991]. German Ideology: From France to Germany and Back. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1957 [1937]. Professional Ethics and Civil Morals. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, Émile. 1964. Rules of Sociological Method. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dürr, Anke. 2013. ‘50 Jahre Theatertreffen: Als Schlingensief weinte’. Der Spiegel. 2 May 2013.Google Scholar
Dürr, Heiner and Gramke, Jürgen Eds. 1993. Erneuerung des Ruhrgebiets. Regionales Erbe und Gestaltung für die Zukunft. Ferdinand Schöningh: Paderborn.Google Scholar
D-Statis. 2015. ‘Öffentliche Ausgaben für Kultur: Bundesländer, Jahre, Kulturbereiche’. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wiesbaden, Stand 2015.Google Scholar
Dürr, Heiner and Gramke, Jürgen Eds. 2020. ‘Pressrelease #490 from 9 December 2020’. Statistisches Bundesamt. Wiesbaden, Stand 2020. www.destatis.de/EN/Press/2020/12/PE20_490_216.html (last accessed, 26 August 2022).Google Scholar
Eaton, Marcia Muelder. 2001. Merit, Aesthetic and Ethical. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eberth, Michael. 2015. EINHEIT. Berliner Theatertagebücher 1991–1996. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Eddy, Melissa. 2013. ‘In Germany’s Rust Belt, a Polished but Ailing City’. New York Times. 24 December 2013.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1969 [1939]. The Civilizing Process, Vol. I. The History of Manners. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 1982 [1933]. The Civilizing Process, Vol. II. State Formation and Civilization. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Elias, Norbert. 2002 [1989]. Studien über die Deutschen. Machtkämpfe und Habitusentwicklung im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Ed. Schröter, Michael. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Englund, Harri. 2011. Human Rights and African Airwaves: Mediating Equality on the Chichewa Radio. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Eriksen, Thomas H. and Sivert Nielsen, Finn. 2001. A History of Anthropology. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Evans, Nicholas and Mair, Jonathan. 2015. ‘Ethics across Borders. Incommensurability and Affinity’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 201225.Google Scholar
Evans, Richard J. 2003. The Coming of the Third Reich. London: Allen Lane.Google Scholar
Evans-Pritchard, Edward E. 1928. ‘The Dance’. Africa: Journal of the International African Institute 1 (4): 446462.Google Scholar
Eyck, Toby A. Ten and Busch, Lawrence. 2012. ‘Justifying the Art Critique: Clement Greenberg, Michael Kimmelman, and Orders of Worth in Art Criticism’. Cultural Sociology 6 (2): 217231.Google Scholar
Fabian, Johannes. 1999. ‘Theater and Anthropology, Theatricality and Culture’. Research in African Literatures 30 (4): 2431.Google Scholar
Farenholtz, Alexander and Völckers, Hortensia. 2013. ‘Grusswort’, in: Festspiele, Berliner Ed. Berliner Festspiele. Fünfzig Theatertreffen. 1964–2013. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, p. 7.Google Scholar
Faubion, James. 2001. ‘Toward an Anthropology of Ethics: Foucault and the Pedagogies of Autopoiesis’. Representations 74 (1): 83104.Google Scholar
Faubion, James. 2011. An Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Faubion, James. 2013. ‘The Subject That Is Not One: On the Ethics of Mysticism’. Anthropological Theory 13 (4): 287307.Google Scholar
Faubion, James. 2014. ‘Constantine Cavafy: A Parrhesiast for the Cynic of the Future’, in: Faubion, James. Ed. Foucault Now: Current Perspectives in Foucault Studies. Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 225242.Google Scholar
Fehrenbach, Elisabeth. 2001. Vom Ancien Régime zum Wiener Kongress. Munich: Oldenbourg.Google Scholar
Fetscher, Justus, Lämmert, Eberhard, and Schutte, Jürgen. Eds. 1991. Die Gruppe 47 in der Geschichte der Bundesrepublik. Würzburg: Königshausen + Neumann.Google Scholar
Felsch, Philipp. 2015. Der lange Sommer der Theorie. Geschichte einer Revolte. 1960–1990. Munich: C.H. Beck.Google Scholar
Fillitz, Thomas. 2015. ‘Anthropology and Discourses on Global Art’. Social Anthropology 23 (3): 299313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Lichte, Erika, Jost, Torsten and Jain, Saskya I.. 2014. Eds. The Politics of Interweaving Performance Cultures. Beyond Postcolonialism. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Flood, Gavin. 2004. The Ascetic Self: Subjectivity, Memory and Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. 2015. ‘Reflecting on Political Performance: Introducing Critical Perspectives’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 128.Google Scholar
Foreign Office. 2007 [1943]. Instructions for British Servicemen in Germany 1944. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
Foroutan, Naika. 2015. ‘Post-migrant society’, in: Unity in Diversity: Integration in a Post-Migrant Society. Bundeszentrale für Politische Bildung. Online dossier: www.bpb.de/themen/migration-integration/kurzdossiers/205295/post-migrant-society/ (last accessed 20 May 2023).Google Scholar
Fortes, Meyer. 1955. ‘Radcliffe-Brown’s Contributions to the Study of Social Organization’. British Journal of Sociology 6 (1): 1630.Google Scholar
Foster, Clare. 2015. ‘Whose Theatre Is It Anyway? Ancient Chorality versus Modern Drama’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 224257.Google Scholar
Foster, Hal. 1996. The Return of the Real: Art and Theory at the End of the Century. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1970 [1966]. The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1986 [1984]. The History of Sexuality, Vol. III. The Care of the Self. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books (Random House).Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1988. ‘Technologies of the Self’, in: Luther, H. Martin, Gutman, Huck, and Patrick, H. Hutton. Eds. Technologies of the Self: A Seminar with Michel Foucault. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press, pp. 1649.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990a [1984]. The History of Sexuality, Vol. II. The Use of Pleasure. Trans. Robert Hurley. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1990b [1984]. ‘An Aesthetics of Existence’, in: Kritzman, Lawrence D.. Ed. Michel Foucault: Politics, Philosophy, Culture: Interviews and Other Writings 1977–1984. New York and London: Routledge, pp. 4753.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2000a [1981]. ‘Sexuality and Solitude’, in: Rabinow, Paul. Ed. Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 1. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. London: Allen Lane, pp. 175184.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2000b [1994]. ‘The Ethics of the Concern for Self as a Practice of Freedom’, in: Rabinow, Paul. Ed. Robert Hurley et al. Trans. Essential Works of Michel Foucault, Vol. 1. Ethics: Subjectivity and Truth. London and New York: Penguin Books, pp. 281302.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2008 [2004]. The Birth of Biopolitics: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1978–1979. Ed. Senellart, M.. Trans. G. Burchell. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 2010 [2008]. The Government of Self and Others: Lectures at the Collège de France, 1982–1983. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Frank, Alison Frank 2005. Oil Empire: Visions of Prosperity in Austrian Galicia. Harvard Historical Studies 149. Cambridge, MA and London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Frei, Norbert. 1993. Nationalist Socialist Rule in Germany: The Führer State, 1933–1945. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Fulbrook, Mary. 2011 [1991]. A History of Germany, 1918–2008: The Divided Nation. 3rd Edn. Malden, MA and Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Gaborik, Patricia. 2021. Mussolini’s Theatre. Fascist Experiments in Art and Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gadamer, Hans-Georg. 2010 [1960]. Wahrheit und Methode. Grundzüge einer philosophischen Hermeneutik. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
Garfinkel, H. 1967. Studies in Ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Gay y Blasco, P. 1999. Gypsies in Madrid: Sex, Gender and the Performance of Identity. Oxford and New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures: Selected Essays. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1983. ‘Blurred Genres: The Refiguration of Social Thought’, in: Local Knowledge: Further Essays in Interpretive Anthropology. London: Fontana Press, pp. 1935.Google Scholar
Geertz, Clifford. 1998. ‘Deep Hanging Out’. New York Review of Books 45 (16): 6972.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1992. ‘The Technology of Enchantment and the Enchantment of Technology’, in: Coote, Jeremy and Shelton, A.. Eds. Anthropology, Art and Aesthetics. Oxford: Clarendon Press, pp. 4067.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1998. Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gell, Alfred. 1999. The Art of Anthropology: Essays and Diagrams. London: LSE Monographs/Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
George, Kenneth M. 2010. Picturing Islam: Art and Ethics in a Muslim Lifeworld. Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1981. The Idea of a Critical Theory: Habermas and the Frankfurt School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 1999. Morality, Culture, and History: Essays on German Philosophy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 2005. ‘Art and Criticism in Adorno’s Aesthetics’, in: Outside Ethics. Princeton, NJ and Oxford: Princeton University Press, pp. 161183.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Anthony. 1994. ‘Living in a Post-Traditional Society’, in: Beck, Ulrich, Giddens, Anthony, and Lash, Scott. Reflexive Modernization: Politics, Tradition and Aesthetics in the Modern Social Order. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, pp. 56109.Google Scholar
Gielen, Pascal. 2013. ‘Institutional Imagination: Instituting Contemporary Art Minus the “Contemporary”’, in: Gielen, Pascal. Ed. Institutional Attitudes: Instituting Art in a Flat World. Antennae 8. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 1132.Google Scholar
Giesen, Bernhard. 1998. Intellectuals and the Nation: Collective Identity in a German Axial Age. Trans. Levis, N. and Weisz, A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gilcher-Holtey, Ingrid. 2000. ‘“Askese schreiben, schreib: Askese”. Zur Rolle der Gruppe 47 in der politischen Kultur der Nachkriegszeit’. Internationales Archiv für Sozialgeschichte der deutschen Literatur 2: 134167.Google Scholar
Gilcher-Holtey, Ingrid. 2009. ‘Comment’, in: Elliot Neaman, Dirk Moses, Ingrid Gilcher-Holtey, Jens Hacke, Christina von Hodenberg, and Thomas Meyer. ‘Forum: The Intellectual History of the Federal Republic’. German History 27 (2): 244258.Google Scholar
Gill, Emily R. 1992. ‘MacIntyre, Rationality, and the Liberal Tradition’. Polity 24 (3): 433457.Google Scholar
Gillett, John. 2015. ‘Preface to the Bloomsbury Revelations Edition’ in: Stanislavski, C.. 2015 [1981]. Creating a Role. London: Bloomsbury, pp. viiix.Google Scholar
Gingrich, Andre. 1998. ‘Toward an Anthropology of Germany: A Culture of Moralist Self-Education? (Dumont’s German Ideology: From France to Germany and Back)’. Current Anthropology 39 (4): 567572.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 1901 [1803]. ‘Regeln für Schauspieler’, in: Böhme, Hans-Georg. Ed. Die Weilburger Goethe-Funde. Neues aus Theatre und Schauspielkunst. Blätter aus dem Nachlaß Pius Alexander Wolffs. Emsdetten: Lechte, pp. 737.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang. 2010 [1795]. Wilhelm Meister’s Apprenticeship and Travels. Trans. Thomas Carlyle, in: Traill, Henry Duff. Ed. The Works of Thomas Carlyle, Vol. 23. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goethe, Johann Wolfgang and Schiller, Friedrich. 1986 [1799]. ‘Über den Dilettantismus’, in: Richter, Karl. Ed. Sämtliche Werke nach Epochen seines Schaffens. Münchener Ausgabe. Band 6.2. Munich: Hanser.Google Scholar
Goffman, Erving. 1959. The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. London and New York: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Cora Sol. 2009. Capturing the German Eye: American Visual Propaganda in Occupied Germany. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Götze, Lutz. 2012. ‘Bertolt Brecht in Ost- und Westdeutschland’. GlobKult Magazin. Politik, Gesellschaft, Kultur, Geschichte. 7 September 2012.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2009. Direct Action: An Ethnography. Edinburgh and Oakland: AK Press.Google Scholar
Graeber, David. 2015. The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy. Brooklyn, NY and London: Melville House Publishing.Google Scholar
Greenberg, Clement. 1939. ‘Avant-Garde and Kitsch’. Partisan Review 6 (5): 3449.Google Scholar
Grimshaw, Anna and Ravetz, Amanda. 2015. ‘The Ethnographic Turn – and After: A Critical Approach towards the Realignment of Art and Anthropology’. Social Anthropology 23 (4): 418434.Google Scholar
Grütters, Monika. 2014a. “Wir müssen unsere Kulturlandschaft schützen!” Interview by Nina May. Leipziger Volkszeitung, 28 July 2014.Google Scholar
Grütters, Monika. 2014b. ‘Rede von Kulturstaatsministerin Monika Grütters im Rahmen der Mitgliederversammlung des Deutschen Kulturrates’, 25 September 2014. Staatsministerin für Kultur und Medien. www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/Rede/2014/09/2014-09-25-gruetters-dkr.html?nn=402618 (last accessed, 10 August 2022).Google Scholar
Guattari, Félix. 1995. Chaosmosis: An Ethico-Aesthetic Paradigm. Trans. Paul Bains and Julian Pefanis. Bloomington and Indianapolis: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Haarmann, Anke. 2019. Artistic Research. Eine epistemologische Ästhetik. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Haas, Birgit. 2004. Theater der Wende – Wendetheater. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1989 [1962]. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge and Malden, MA: Polity.Google Scholar
Habben, Gralf-Edzard. 2014. ‘Dem Theater-Spiel Raum geben’. Westdeutsche Allgemeine Zeitung. 7 June 2014.Google Scholar
Hahn, Hans Peter. 2010. Ethnologie. Eine Einführung. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hallam, Elizabeth and Ingold, Tim. 2008. Creativity and Cultural Improvisation. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Hamburger, Maik and Williams, Simon. Eds. 2008. A History of German Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hammerthal, Ralph. 1998. ‘Kein Zimmer für den Zensor. Iranische Theatergruppen in Mülheim an der Ruhr’. Süddeutsche Zeitung, 25 September 1998.Google Scholar
Hänzi, Denis. 2013. Die Ordnung des Theaters. Eine Soziologie der Regie. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Harvie, Jen and Lavender, Andy. Eds. 2010. Making Contemporary Theatre: International Rehearsal Processes. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Haselbach, Dieter, Klein, Armin, Knüsel, Pius, and Opitz, Stephan. 2012. Der Kulturinfarkt. Von Allem zu viel und überall das Gleiche. Munich: Knaus.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Annette. 1999. ‘Am Ende der Reise sind wir es, die verändert zurückkommen werden. Das Theater an der Ruhr auf der Seidenstraße’, in: Herzog, Clementine. Ed. Kunst wird die Welt mehr verändern als Politik. Texte einer Tagung 1999 in der Evangelischen Akademie Iserlohn. Epd-Entwicklungspolitik, Materialien 1999/4. Frankfurt and Main: Gemeinschaftswerk der Evangelischen Publizistik, pp. 6365.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Annette. 1999/2000. ‘Das Theater an der Ruhr zur Morgenröte in Iran’. Iranzamin. Echo der iranischen Kultur 12 (6/7): 475478.Google Scholar
Heilmann, Annette. 2002. ‘Die Achse der guten Autofahrer. Roberto Ciulli inszeniert Garcia Lorcas Bernarda Albas Haus in Teheran’. Theater der Zeit 57 (4): 3031.Google Scholar
Heinicke, Julius, Joy Kristin Kalu, Janina Möbius, Siouzouli, Natascha, and Warstat, Matthias. Eds. 2015. Theater als Intervention. Politiken ästhetischer Praxis. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Heinrich, Anselm. 2017. Theatre in Europe Under German Occupation. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemke, Rolf C. 2008. ‘Rolf C. Hemke, Netzwerker’. Interview by Margitta Ulbricht. Westfalenpost, 7 December 2008.Google Scholar
Hemke, Rolf C. Ed. 2010. Theatre in Sub-Saharan Africa. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Hemke, Rolf C. Ed. 2013. Theatre in the Arab World. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Herder, Johann Gottfried. 1773. Von deutscher Art und Kunst. Einige fliegende Blätter (‘On German Character and Art: A Collection of Broadsheets’). Hamburg: Bode.Google Scholar
Herdlein, Hans. 1992. ‘Das Ciulli-Syndrom’. Bühnengenossenschaft 3: 79.Google Scholar
Herzfeld, Michael. 1997. Portrait of a Greek Imagination: An Ethnographic Biography of Andreas Nenedakis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hesmondhalgh, David and Baker, Sarah. 2011. Creative Labour: Media Work in Three Cultural Industries. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paolo. 2015. ‘Agreeing to disagree: LBGTQ activism and the church in Italy. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 5 (2): 325344.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paolo. 2018. After Difference. Queer Activism in Italy and Anthropological Theory. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Heywood, Paolo. 2021. ‘Ordinary Exemplars: Cultivating ‘The Everyday’ in the Birthplace of Fascism’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 64 (1): 91121.Google Scholar
Hiley, Jim. 1981. Theatre at Work: The Story of the National Theatre’s Production of Brecht’s Galileo. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hirschkind, Charles. 2006. The Ethical Soundscape: Cassette Sermons and Islamic Counter-Publics in Egypt. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Hiß, Guido. 2001. ‘Aspekte der Mülheimer Dramaturgie’, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Zwanzig Jahre. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, pp. 2731.Google Scholar
Höbel, Wolfgang. 1989. ‘Ausfahrt Utopia’. Der Spiegel 3: 166168.Google Scholar
Hobsbawm, Eric. 1983. ‘Introduction: Inventing Tradition’, in: Hobsbawm, Eric and Ranger, Terence. Eds. The Invention of Tradition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Höffe, Ottfried. 1998. ‘Aristoteles’ universalistische Tugendethik’, in: Rippe, K.-L. and Schaber, P.. Eds. Tugendethik. Stuttgart: Reclam, pp. 4268.Google Scholar
Hofmann, Franck and Markus, Messling. 2020. ‘On the Ends of Universalism’, in: Hofmann, Franck and Messling, Markus. Eds. The Epoch of Universalism 1769–1989. Berlin and Boston, MA: De Gruyter, pp. 140.Google Scholar
Hoffmann, Hilmar. 1985. Kultur für Morgen. Ein Beitrag zur Lösung der Zukunftsprobleme. Frankfurt am Main: Fischer Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2009. ‘Ontography and Alterity: Defining Anthropological Truth’. Social Analysis 53 (2): 8093.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin. 2012. Truth in Motion: The Recursive Anthropology of Cuban Divination. Chicago, IL and London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Holbraad, Martin, Axel Pedersen, Morten, and Sneath, David. Eds. ‘2009. Technologies of the Imagination: An Introduction’. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 74 (1): 530.Google Scholar
Holtz, Bärbel. 2010. ‘Preußens Kulturstaatlichkeit im langen 19. Jahrhundert im Fokus seines Kultusministeriums’, in: Neugebauer, Wolfgang and Holtz, Bärbel. Eds. Kulturstaat und Bürgergesellschaft. Preußen, Deutschland und Europa im 19. und 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, pp. 5577.Google Scholar
Holzhey, Christoph F. E. and Wedemeyer, Arnd. Eds. 2019. Re-. An Errant Glossary. Cultural Inquiry, 15. Berlin: ICI Berlin Press.Google Scholar
Hoppe, Jens, Schimek, Michael, and Simon, Michael. Eds. 1998. Die Volkskunde auf dem Weg ins nächste Jahrtausend. Ergebnisse einer Bestandaufnahme. Münster and New York: Waxmann.Google Scholar
Horkheimer, Max. 2004 [1947]. Eclipse of Reason. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Hortmann, Wilhelm. 1999. Shakespeare on the German Stage: The Twentieth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Högl, Günther. 2004. ‘Das Dortmunder Stadttheater – eine Stiftung des Bürgertums’. Heimat Dortmund. Stadtgeschichte in Bildern und Berichten 2: 79.Google Scholar
Huber, Peter. 1997. ‘Goethes praktische Theaterarbeit’, in: Witte, Bernd and Buck, Theo. Eds. Goethe-Handbuch. Band 2. Stuttgart: Metzler, pp. 2142.Google Scholar
Huizinga, Johan. 1950. Homo ludens. A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1918. Gesammelte Schriften, vol. 1. Prussian Academy Edition. Ed. Leitzmann, A.. Berlin: Königlich Preussische Akademie der Wissenschaften.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1967 [1792]. ‘Über das Studium des Altertums und des Griechischen insbesondere’, in: Flitner, Andreas and Giel, Klaus. Eds. Werke, Band II. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 124.Google Scholar
Humboldt, Wilhelm von. 1969 [1813]. ‘Ideen zu einem Versuch, die Gränzen der Wirksamkeit des Staates zu bestimmen’, in: Flitner, Andreas and Giel, Klaus. Eds. Werke, Band I. Darmstadt: Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft, pp. 56233. [Published in English as The Limits of the State. Ed. J. W. Burrow. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1969.]Google Scholar
Humphrey, Caroline and Laidlaw, James. 1995. The Archetypal Actions of Ritual: A Theory of Ritual Illustrated by the Jain Rite of Worship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hyra, David S. 2008. The New Urban Renewal: The Economic Transformation of Harlem and Bronzeville. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
IBA (Internationale Bauausstellung). 1989. www.iba.nrw.de/iba/main.htm (last accessed, 22 March 2023).Google Scholar
Ingold, Tim. 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ingram, Mark. 2011. Rites of the Republic: Citizens’ Theatre and the Politics of Culture in Southern France. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Innes, Christopher. 1977. Erwin Piscator’s Political Theatre: The Development of Modern German Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Innes, Christopher and Shevtsova, Maria. 2013. The Cambridge Introduction to Theatre Directing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Irmer, Thomas and Schmidt, Matthias. 2003. Die Bühnenrepublik. Theater in der DDR. Ed. Bergmann, Wolfgang. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Ismayr, Wolfgang. 1985. Das Politische Theater in Westdeutschland. 2. Ausgabe. Meisenheim: Anton Heim Verlag.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Werner. 1939. Paideia: The Ideals of Greek Culture, Vol. I. Archaic Greece – The Mind of Athens. Trans. Gilbert Highet. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jaramillo, George S. and Tomann, Juliane. Eds. 2021. Transcending the Nostalgic. Landscapes of Postindustrial Europe beyond Representation. New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Jay, Martin. 1996 [1973]. The Dialectical Imagination: A History of the Frankfurt School and the Institute of Social Research, 1923–1950. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Jeffries, Stuart. 2016. Grand Hotel Abyss. The Lives of the Frankfurt School. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Juris, Jeffrey. 2015. ‘Embodying Protest: Culture and Performance within Social Movements’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 82104.Google Scholar
Kaehler, Siegfried A. 1980. ‘Das preußisch-deutsche Problem seit der Reichsgründung’, in: Blasius, Dirk. Ed. Preußen in der deutschen Geschichte. Königstein and Ts: Hanstein, pp. 2645.Google Scholar
Kaes, Anton, Jay, Martin, and Dimendberg, Edward. Eds. 1994. The Weimar Republic Sourcebook. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kaiser, Joachim, Ulrich Khuon, Peter Kümmel, Walburg, Lars-Ole, and Osten, Manfred. 2010. Regietheater-Theaterregie. Zur Lage des deutschen Theaters. Edition Stiftung Schloss Neuhardenberg. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Kallmorgen, Werner. 1955. Was heisst und zu welchem Ende baut man Kommunaltheater. Darmstadt: Verlag Das Beispiel.Google Scholar
Kant, Immanuel. 1951 [1790]. Critique of Judgement. New York: Hafner.Google Scholar
Kapferer, Judith. Ed. 2008. The State and the Arts: Articulating Power and Subversion. New York and Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Karaca, Banu. 2021. The National Frame. Art and State Violence in Turkey and Germany. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Keane, Webb. 2016. Ethical Lives: Its Natural and Social Histories. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Keenan, Bernard and Pottage, Alain. 2017. ‘Ethics in Rehearsal’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 23: 154166.Google Scholar
Kermani, Navid. 2001. ‘Was Verstehen bedeutet. Zum zwanzigjährigen Bestehen des Theaters an der Ruhr’. Frankfurter Rundschau, 17 January 2001.Google Scholar
Klamer, Arjo, Petrova, Lyudmilla, and Mignosa, Anna. 2006. Financing the Arts and Culture in the European Union. Policy Department, Structural and Cohesion Policies. Commissioned by the European Parliament. Brussels: European Parliament.Google Scholar
Klein, Armin. 2008 [2003]. Besucherbindung im Kulturbetrieb. Ein Handbuch. 2. Auflage. Wiesbaden: Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.Google Scholar
Klein, Gabriele. 2012. ‘Labour, Life, Art. On the Social Anthropology of Labour’. Performance Research 17 (6): 413.Google Scholar
Klein, Gabriele and Kunst, Bojana. 2012. ‘Introduction: Labour and Performance’. Performance Research 17 (6): 13.Google Scholar
Koepping, Klaus-Peter. 1983. Adolf Bastian and the Psychic Unity of Mankind: The Foundations of Anthropology in Nineteenth Century Germany. St Lucia: University of Queensland Press.Google Scholar
Kolb, Eberhard. 1999 [1988]. The Weimar Republic. Trans. P. S. Falla. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kolinsky, Eva and van der Will, Wilfried. 2004. ‘In Search of German Culture: An Introduction’, in: Kolinsky, Eva and van der Will, Wilfried. Eds. The Cambridge Companion to Modern German Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Koller, Ann Marie 1984. The Theater Duke: Georg II of Saxe-Meiningen and the German Stage. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
König, Viola. Ed. 2003. Ethnologisches Museum Berlin. Munich: Prestel.Google Scholar
Korom, Frank J. Ed. 2013. The Anthropology of Performance: A Reader. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Reinhart. 2002. The Practice of Conceptual History: Timing History, Spacing Concepts. Trans. Todd Samuel Presner et al. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kott, Jan. 1990. ‘The Dramaturg’. New Theatre Quarterly 6 (21): 34.Google Scholar
Kraft, Hannelore. 2013. ‘Ministerpräsidentin Kraft verleiht Staatspreis Nordrhein-Westfalen an Dr. Roberto Ciulli’. Landesregierung NRW. 20 November 2013. www.land.nrw/pressemitteilung/ministerpraesidentin-kraft-verleiht-staatspreis-nordrhein-westfalen-dr-roberto (last accessed, 28 August 2022)Google Scholar
Kraus, Dorothea. 2007. Theater-Proteste. Zur Politisierung von Straße und Bühne in den 1960er Jahren. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Kresse, Kai. 2007. Philosophising in Mombasa: Knowledge, Islam and Intellectual Practice on the Swahili Coast. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Kreuder, Friedemann, Bachmann, Michael, Pfahl, Julia, and Volz, Dorothea. Eds. 2012. Theater und Subjektkonstitution: Theatrale Praktiken zwischen Affirmation und Subversion. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Krump, Annika. 2015. Tagebuch einer Hospitantin. Berlin, Volksbühne 1992/93. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Kuhn, Thomas. 1962. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kumar, Nita. 1992. Friends, Brothers and Informants: Fieldwork Memoirs of Banaras. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kunst, Bojana. 2015. Artist at Work: Proximity of Art and Capitalism. Washington, DC and Winchester: Zero Books.Google Scholar
Kurzenberger, Hajo. 2009. Der kollektive Prozess des Theaters. Chorkörper – Probengemeinschaften – theatrale Kreativität. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Ladwig, Patrice. 2009. ‘Narrative Ethics: The Excess of Giving and Moral Ambiguity in the Lao Vessantara-Jataka’, in: Heintz, Monica. Ed. The Anthropology of Moralities. Oxford: Berghahn, pp. 136160.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 1995. Riches and Renunciation: Religion, Economy and Society among the Jains. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2002. ‘For an Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 8 (2): 311332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2014. The Subject of Virtue: An Anthropology of Ethics and Freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2016. ‘The Interactional Foundations of Ethics and the Formation and Limits of Morality Systems’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6: 455461.Google Scholar
Laidlaw, James. 2023. Ed. The Cambridge Handbook for the Anthropology of Ethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lamb, Stephen. 1985. ‘Intellectuals and the Challenge of Power: The Case of the Munich Räterepublik’, in: Phelan, Anthony. Ed. The Weimar Dilemma: Intellectuals in the Weimar Republic. Manchester: Manchester University Press, pp. 132161.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2000a. ‘The Anthropology of Religion and the Quarrel between Poetry and Philosophy’. Current Anthropology 41 (3): 309320.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2000b. ‘Nuriaty, the Saint and the Sultan: Virtuous Subject and Subjective Virtuoso of the Post-Modern Colony’. Anthropology Today 16 (2): 712.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. Ed. 2010. Ordinary Ethics: Anthropology, Language, and Action. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2013. ‘The Continuous and the Discontinuous Person: Two Dimensions of Ethical Life’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19: 837858.Google Scholar
Lambek, Michael. 2015. ‘Lecture One: Living As If It Mattered’, in: Lambek, Michael, Das, Veena, Fassin, Didier, and Keane, Webb. Eds. Four Lectures on Ethics: Anthropological Perspectives. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press/HAU Books, pp. 545.Google Scholar
Lammert, Norbert. 2004. ‘Kulturstaat und Bürgergesellschaft’, in: Lammert, Norbert. Ed. Alles nur Theater? Beiträge zur Debatte über Kulturstaat und Bürgergesellschaft. Cologne: DuMont, pp. 1325.Google Scholar
Langhoff, Shermin. 2011. ‘Die Herkunft spielt keine Rolle: “Postmigrantisches Theater” im Ballhaus Naunynstraße’, Interview with Shermin Langhoff, Bundeszentrale für politische Bildung, 10 March.Google Scholar
Langhoff, Shermin. 2016. ‘Nur kein Voyeurismus: Shermin Langhoff, die Chefin des Berliner Gorki-Theaters, gründet ein “Exil Ensemble” mit Geflüchteten’, Süddeutsche Zeitung, 20 July.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004a. ‘Why Has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern’. Critical Inquiry 30: 225248.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2004b. ‘On Using ANT for Studying Information Systems: A (Somewhat) Socratic Dialogue’, in: Avgerou, Chrisanthi, Cibarra, Claudio, and Land, Frank. Eds. The Social Study of Information and Communication Technology: Innovation, Actors, and Contexts. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 6276.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 2013. An Inquiry into Modes of Existence: An Anthropology of the Moderns. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Lazar, Sian. 2008. El Alto, Rebel City: Self and Citizenship in Andean Bolivia. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1954. ‘Aesthetics’, in: Evans-Pritchard, E. E., Firth, Raymond, Leach, Edmund, et al. Eds. The Institutions of Primitive Society: A Series of Broadcast Talks. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 2538. [Reprinted as ‘Art in Cultural Context’, in: Peter B. Hammond. Ed. Cultural and Social Anthropology: Selected Readings. New York: Macmillan, 1964, pp. 344–350.]Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 1976. Culture and Communication: The Logic by Which Symbols Are Connected. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leach, Edmund. 2000 [1954]. ‘Ritual as an Expression of Social Status’, in: Hugh-Jones, Stephen and Laidlaw, James. Eds. The Essential Edmund Leach: Volume 1 Anthropology and Society. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 153157.Google Scholar
Lebner, Ashley. Ed. 2017. Redescribing Relations. Strathernian Conversations on Ethnography, Knowledge and Politics. Oxford: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2002. Das Politische Schreiben. Essays zu Theatertexten. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006 [1999]. Postdramatic Theatre. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Lemon, Alaina. 2000. Between Two Fires: Gypsy Performance and Romani Memory from Pushkin to Postsocialism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Lepenies, Wolfgang. 2008. Kultur und Politik. Deutsche Geschichten. Munich and Vienna: Carl Hanser.Google Scholar
Letzler Cole, Susan. 1992. Directors in Rehearsal: A Hidden World. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Levinson, Jerrold. Ed. 1998. Aesthetics and Ethics: Essays at the Intersection. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lewis, Pericles. 2007. The Cambridge Introduction to Modernism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Leydecker, Karl. Ed. 2006. German Novelists of the Weimar Republic: Intersections of Literature and Politics. New York: Camden House.Google Scholar
Lichtenfels, Peter and Rouse, John S.. Eds. 2013. Performance, Politics and Activism. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Liepsch, Elisa and Warner, Julian. Eds. Allianzen. Kritische Praxis an weißen Institutionen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Richard 2010 [2006]. Neo-Bohemia: Art and Commerce in the Post-Industrial City. 2nd Edn. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Long, Nicholas. 2015. ‘For a Verbatim Ethnography’, in: Flynn, A. and Tinius, J.. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 305333.Google Scholar
Lott, Micah. 2002. ‘Reasonably Traditional: Self-Contradiction and Self-Reference in Alasdair MacIntyre’s Account of Tradition-Based Authority’. Journal of Religious Ethics 30: 315339.Google Scholar
Love, Nancy S. and Mattern, Mark. Eds. 2013. Doing Democracy: Activist Art and Cultural Politics. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
Lowie, Robert H. 1954. Towards Understanding Germany. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Luckhurst, Mary. 2006. Dramaturgy: A Revolution in Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, Carsten, Glaser, Jan-Christoph, Taddicken, Sven, and Ziemnicki, Jakob. 2008. 1. Mai – Helden bei der Arbeit. Film. Premiered at the Berlinale, 2008.Google Scholar
Luhmann, Niklas. 1995. Die Kunst der Gesellschaft. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Lyotard, Jean-François. 1984 [1979]. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon. 1997. ‘The Museum as Mirror: Ethnographic Reflections’, in: James, Allison, Hockey, Jenny, and Dawson, Andrew. Eds. After Writing Culture: Epistemology and Praxis in Contemporary Anthropology. London: Routledge, pp. 161176.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon. 2001. ‘Ethnography in the Science Museum’, in: Gellner, David and Hirsch, Eric. Eds. Inside Organizations: Anthropologists at Work. Oxford: Berg, pp. 7796.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon. 2009. Difficult Heritage: Negotiating the Nazi Past in Nuremberg and Beyond. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon. 2013. Memorylands: Heritage and Identity in Europe Today. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Macdonald, Sharon. Ed. 2022. Doing Diversity in Museums and Heritage. A Berlin Ethnography. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1981. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Whose Rationality? London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1990. Three Rival Versions of Moral Enquiry: Encyclopaedia, Genealogy, Tradition. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Madison, D. Soyini. 2010. Acts of Activism. Human Rights as Radical Performance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2001a. ‘Rehearsed Spontaneity and the Conventionality of Ritual: Disciplines of “Salāt”’. American Ethnologist 28 (4): 827853.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2001b. ‘Feminist Theory, Embodiment, and the Docile Agent: Some Reflections on the Egyptian Islamic Revival’. Cultural Anthropology 16 (2): 202236.Google Scholar
Mahmood, Saba. 2005. Politics of Piety: The Islamic Revival and the Feminist Subject. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Malinowski, Bronisław. 2013 [1935]. Coral Gardens and their Magic: A Study of the Methods of Tilling the Soil and of Agricultural Rites in the Trobriand Islands. Hamburg: Severus.Google Scholar
Malzacher, Florian. Ed. 2015. Not Just a Mirror: Looking for the Political Theatre of Today. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Malzacher, Florian. Ed. 1948. Magic, Science and Religion and Other Essays. Glencoe, IL: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ruth. E. 2008. Cosmopolitan Anxieties: Turkish Challenges to Citizenship and Belonging in Germany. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Mandel, Ruth. E. 2013. ‘Fifty Years of Migration, Fifty Years of Waiting. Turkey, Germany and the European Union’. German Politics and Society 31 (2): 6678.Google Scholar
Manning, Paul and Gershon, Ilana 2013. ‘Animating Interaction’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 3: 107137.Google Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2001. Minaret Building and Apprenticeship in Yemen. Richmond: Curzon.Google Scholar
Marchand, Trevor H. J. 2009. The Masons of Djenné. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
Marchart, Oliver. 2013. Die Prekarisierungsgesellschaft: Prekäre Proteste. Politik und Ökonomie im Zeichen der Prekarisierung. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Marcus, George E. and Myers, Fred R.. Eds. 1995. The Traffic in Culture: Reconfiguring Art and Anthropology. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, Magnus. 2005. Living Islam: Muslim Religious Experience in Pakistan’s North-West Frontier. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Marsden, Magnus. 2007. ‘All-Male Sonic Gatherings, Islamic Reform, and Masculinity in Northern Pakistan’. American Ethnologist 34: 473490.Google Scholar
Marsden, Magnus, Diana, Ibañez-Tirado, and David, Henig. 2016. ‘Everyday Diplomacy. Introduction to Special Issue’. The Cambridge Journal of Anthropology 34 (2): 222.Google Scholar
Martínez, Francisco. 2021. Ethnographic Experiments with Artists, Designers and Boundary Objects. Exhibitions as a Research Method. London: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Marx, Peter W. 2003. Theater und kulturelle Erinnerung. Kultursemiotische Untersuchungen zu George Tabori, Tadeusz Kantor und Rina Yerushalmi. Basel and Tübingen: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Marx, Peter W. 2006. Max Reinhardt. Vom bürgerlichen Theater zur metropolitanen Kultur. Tübingen: A. Francke Verlag.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas-Keyes, Stella 1987. ‘The Native Anthropologist: Constraints and Strategies in Research’, in: Jackson, Anthony. Ed. Anthropology at Home. ASA Monographs 25. London and New York: Tavistock, pp. 180195.Google Scholar
Mast, Jason L. 2012. The Performative Presidency. Crisis and Resurrection during the Clinton Years. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Cheryl. 2012. ‘Two Virtue Ethics and the Anthropology of Morality’. Anthropological Theory 12: 161184.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Cheryl. 2013. ‘Moral Selves and Moral Scenes: Narrative Experiments in Everyday Life’. Ethnos: Journal of Anthropology 78 (3): 301327.Google Scholar
Mattingly, Cheryl. 2014. Moral Laboratories: Family Peril and the Struggle for a Good Life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Matzke, Annemarie. 2012a. Arbeit am Theater. Eine Diskursgeschichte der Probe. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Matzke, Annemarie. 2012b. ‘Hildesheimer Thesen V: Das Freie Theater gibt es nicht. Jenseits des Freien Theaters’ Nachtkritik.de (21 November 2012).Google Scholar
Matzke, Annemarie. 2014. ‘Was tut Klaus Wildenhahn beim Filmen von Pina Bausch und ihren Tänzern in Wuppertal? Das Making Of als Ethnografie von Probenarbeit’, in: Diekmann, Stefanie. Ed. Die andere Szene. Theaterproben und Theaterarbeit im Dokumentarfilm. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, pp. 8299.Google Scholar
Matzke, Annemarie, Wortelkamp, Isa, and Weiler, Christel. Eds. 2012. Das Buch der Angewandten Theaterwissenschaft. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1990 [1923]. The Gift. The Form and Reason for Exchange in Archaic Societies. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1936. ‘Les techniques du corps’. Journal de Psychologie 32: 34.Google Scholar
Mauss, Marcel. 1985 [1938]. “A Category of the Human Mind”, in: Carrithers, Michael, Collins, Steven, and Lukes, Steven. Eds. The Category of the Person. Anthropology, Philosophy, History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 125.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 1998. ‘Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal’. New Theatre Quarterly 14 (53): 7585.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 1999. Space in Performance: Making Meaning in the Theatre. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 2006a. ‘The Emerging Field of Rehearsal Studies’. About Performance 6: 713.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. Ed. 2006b. About Performance 6. Special Issue: ‘Rehearsals and Performance Making Processes’.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 2008. ‘Not Magic, but Work: Rehearsal and the Production of Meaning’. Theatre Research International 33 (3): 276288.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 2009. ‘Towards an Ethnography of Rehearsal’. New Theatre Quarterly 14 (53): 7585.Google Scholar
McAuley, Gay. 2012. Not Magic but Work: An Ethnographic Account of a Rehearsal Process. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
McNevin, Anne. 2010. ‘Becoming Political: Asylum Seeker Activism through Community Theatre’. Local-Global: Identity, Security, Community 8: 142159.Google Scholar
Mehlin, Urs H. 1969. Die Fachsprache des Theaters. Eine Untersuchung der Terminologie von Bühnentechnik, Schauspielkunst und Theaterorganisation. Düsseldorf: Pädagogischer Verlag Schwann.Google Scholar
Melville, Herman. 1986 [1853]. Billy Budd and Other Stories. London: Penguin Classics.Google Scholar
Menger, Pierre-Michel. 2009. Le travail créateur. S’accomplir dans l’incertain. Paris: Éditions du Sueil.Google Scholar
Merkel, Angela. 2004. ‘Kultur und Nation’, in: Lammert, Norbert. Ed. Alles Nur Theater? Beiträge zur Debatte über Kulturstaat und Bürgergesellschaft. Cologne: DuMont-Literatur-und-Kunst-Verlag, pp. 2635.Google Scholar
Messling, Markus. 2016. Gebeugter Geist. Rassismus und Erkenntnis in der modernen europäischen Philologie. Göttingen: Wallstein.Google Scholar
Meyer-Dinkgräfe, Daniel. 2007. Brechtian Theatre of Contradictions: Providing Moral Strength under Conditions of Dictatorship: A Festschrift for Heinz-Uwe Haus. Cambridge: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
Milchman, Alan and Rosenberg, Alan. 2007. ‘The Aesthetic and Ascetic Dimensions of an Ethics of Self-Fashioning: Nietzsche and Foucault’. Parrhesia (2): 4465.Google Scholar
Mill, John Stuart. 1991 [1859]. ‘On Liberty’, in: On Liberty and Other Essays. Ed. Gray, John. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 5130.Google Scholar
Miller, Daniel. 1997. Capitalism: An Ethnographic Approach. Oxford: Berg.Google Scholar
Miller, Seumas, 2012. ‘Social Institutions’, in: Zalta, Edward N.. Ed. The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Fall 2012 Edition). http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2012/entries/social-institutions/ (last accessed 20 August 2022).Google Scholar
Milzow, Katrin. 2012. National Interest and the European Imagination: Discourse and Politics of Blair, Chirac and Schröder. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Minden, Michael. 2011. The German Bildungsroman: Incest and Inheritance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ministry for Culture and Media. 2012. Culture and Media Policy of the German Federal Republic. www.bundesregierung.de/Content/DE/_Anlagen/BKM/2012-07-17-broschuere.pdf?__blob=publicationFile (last accessed, 25 May 2022).Google Scholar
Mirodan, Vladimir. 2020. ‘“Taught by Reality”: Brecht’s Haltung and the Profitable Uses of a Materialistic Super-objective’. Stanislavski Studies. Practice, Legacy, and Contemporary Theatre 8 (2): 179192.Google Scholar
Mittag, Jürgen. Ed. 2008. Die Idee der Kulturhauptstadt Europas. Anfänge, Ausgestaltung und Auswirkungen europäischer Kulturpolitik. Essen: Klartext.Google Scholar
Mitter, Shomit. 1992. Systems of Rehearsal: Stanislavsky, Brecht, Grotowski, and Brook. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Montias, John Michael 1983. ‘Public Support for the Performing Arts in Europe and the United States’, in: Ranis, Gustav and West, Robert L.. Eds. Comparative Development Perspectives. Boulder, CO: Westview Press. Reprinted in: P. DiMaggio. 1986. Nonprofit Enterprise in the Arts. Studies in Mission and Constraint. New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 237–319.Google Scholar
Morgan, Margot. 2013. Politics and Theatre in Twentieth-Century Europe: Imagination and Resistance. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Morphy, Howard and Perkins, Morgan. Eds. 2006. The Anthropology of Art: A Reader. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1993. The Return of the Political. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1999. ‘Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism’. Social Research 66 (3): 745758.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2008. ‘Art and Democracy: Art as an Agonistic Intervention in Public Space’, in: Jorinde, Seijdl and Liesbeth, Melis. Eds. Art as a Public Issue: How Art and Its Institutions Reinvent the Public Dimension. Open 14. Rotterdam and Amsterdam: NAi Publishers, pp. 613.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013a. Agonistics: Thinking the World Politically. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 2013b. ‘Institutions as Sites of Agonistic Intervention’, in: Gielen, Pascal. Ed. Institutional Attitudes. Instituting Art in a Flat World. Valiz and Amsterdam: Antennae, pp. 6374.Google Scholar
Müggenberg, Erika. 1997. ‘Der “Verein zur Förderung des Theaters an der Ruhr e.V.”. Eine Erfolgsgeschichte für Freunde der Theaterkunst’, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Ed. Festschrift zur Eröffnung des Theater an der Ruhr im Raffelbergpark. 10 October 1997. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, pp. 1011.Google Scholar
Müller, Bernhard, Finka, Maroš, and Lintz, Gerd. Eds. 2005. The Rise and Fall of Industry in Central and Eastern Europe: A Comparative Study of Cities and Regions in Eleven Countries. Heidelberg and Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
Müller-Vollmer, Kurt. 1967. Poesie und Einbildungskraft. Zur Dichtungslehre Wilhelm von Humboldts. Stuttgart: Metzler.Google Scholar
Nader, Laura. 1974 [1969]. ‘Up the Anthropologist – Perspectives Gained from Studying Up’, in: Hymes, Dell. Ed. Reinventing Anthropology. New York: Vintage Books, pp. 284311.Google Scholar
Naumann, Michael. 2001. Die schönste Form der Freiheit: Reden und Essays zur Kultur der Nation. Berlin: Siedler.Google Scholar
Navaro-Yashin, Yael. 2002. Faces of the State: Secularism and Public Life in Turkey. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ndikung, Bonaventure Soh Bejeng and Römhild, Regina. 2013. ‘The Post-Other as Avant-Garde’, in: Baker, Daniel and Hlavajova, Maria. Eds. We Roma: A Critical Reader in Contemporary Art. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 206225.Google Scholar
Neligan, Adriana. 2006. ‘Public Funding and Repertoire Conventionality in the German Public Theatre Sector: An Econometric Analysis’. Applied Economics 38: 11111121.Google Scholar
Neumann, Iver B. 2012. At Home with the Diplomats: Inside a European Foreign Ministry. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Nield, Sophie. 2014. ‘“Speeches that Draw Tears”: Theatricality, Commemoration and Social History’. Social History 39 (4): 547556.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 1993 [1872]. The Birth of Tragedy: Out of the Spirit of Music. Trans. Shaun Whiteside. Ed. Tanner, Michael. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Friedrich. 2003 [1886]. Beyond Good and Evil: Prelude to a Philosophy of the Future. Trans. R. J. Hollingdale with an introduction by Michael Tanner. London: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Niewyk, Donald. 2001. The Jews in Germany. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.Google Scholar
Nikitin, Boris, Schlewitt, Carena, and Brenk, Tobias. Eds. 2014. Dokument, Fälschung, Wirklichkeit. Materialband zum zeitgenössischen Dokumentartheater. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Hugh Barr 1985. German Aesthetic and Literary Criticism: Winckelmann, Lessing, Hamann, Herder, Schiller, Goethe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nolte, Ernst. 1985. ‘Between Myth and Revisionism’, in: Koch, H. W.. Ed. Aspects of the Third Reich. London: Macmillan, pp. 1738.Google Scholar
Nolte, Ernst. 1987. Das Vergehen der Vergangenheit. Antwort an meine Kritiker im sogenannten Historikerstreit. Berlin: Ullstein.Google Scholar
Nolte, Paul. 1990. Staatsbildung als Gesellschaftsreform. Politische Reformen in Preußen und den süddeutschen Staaten 1800–1820. Frankfurt am Main and New York: Campus.Google Scholar
Norman, Karin 1991. A Sound Family Makes a Sound State: Ideology and Upbringing in a German Village. Stockholm: Department of Social Anthropology, University of Stockholm.Google Scholar
Novalis (von Hardenberg, Friedrich). 1960 [1798]. ‘Glauben und Liebe’, in: Samuel, Richard. Ed. Das philosophische Werk II. Band 2. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer, pp. 475503.Google Scholar
Nowak, Anja. 2012. Elemente einer Ästhetik des Theatralen in Adornos Ästhetischer Theorie. Würzburg: Königshausen & NeumannGoogle Scholar
Oberender, Thomas. 2021. ‘Occupy History. Denn Trostgeld allein reicht nicht aus‘. Berliner Zeitung. 12 June 2021.Google Scholar
Oberender, Thomas, Ostermeier, Thomas, and Raddatz, Frank. 2013. ‘Die Systemfrage. Der Berliner Schaubühnen-Chef Thomas Ostermeier und Thomas Oberender, Intendant der Berliner Festspiele, im Gespräch‘, Theater der Zeit 12/2013: 12–19.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Justin and Wynne, Derek. Eds. 1996. From the Margins to the Centre: Cultural Production and Consumption in the Post-Industrial City. Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, John. 1998. The State and the Arts: An Analysis of Key Economic Policy Issues in Europe and in the United States. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
O’Hagan, John and Neligan, Adriana. 2005. ‘State Subsidies and Repertoire Conventionality in the Non-Profit English Theatre Sector: An Econometric Analysis’. Journal of Cultural Economics 29: 3557.Google Scholar
Okely, Judith. 1996. Own or Other Culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ortner, Sherry B. 1984. ‘Theory in Anthropology in the Sixties’. Comparative Studies in Society and History 26 (1): 126–66.Google Scholar
Osborne, Peter. 2004. ‘Art Beyond Aesthetics: Philosophical Criticism, Art History and Contemporary Art’. Art History 27 (4): 651670.Google Scholar
Osborne, Peter. 2013. Anywhere or Not At All: Philosophy of Contemporary Art. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Osthaus, Karl Ernst. 1912. ‘Die Gartenvorstadt an der Donnerkuhle’, in: Nicolai, Bernd. Ed. Jahrbuch des Deutschen Werkbundes 1912. Jena: Diederichs, pp. 9396.Google Scholar
Oswald, Margareta von and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. 2020. Across Anthropology. Troubling Colonial Legacies, Museums, and the Curatorial. Leuven: Leuven University Press.Google Scholar
Otteni, Stefan. 2001. ‘Schiessen Sie nicht auf die Souffleuse. Ein Lob des Briefkopfes’, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Zwanzig Jahre. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, pp. 810.Google Scholar
Otto, Wolf Dieter. 1987. Ästhetische Bildung. Studien zur Kunsttheorie Wilhelm von Humboldts. Berne, Frankfurt am Main, New York, and Paris: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Oxford Dictionary of English. 2015. 3rd Edn. Ed. Stevenson, Angus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Pandian, Anand. 2009. Crooked Stalks: Cultivating Virtue in South India. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Parent, Thomas. 1990. ‘Theater und Museen. Zur Geschichte kommunaler Kultur im Revier’, in: Köllmann, Wolfgang et al. Eds. Das Ruhrgebiet im Industriezeitalter. Geschichte und Entwicklung. Band 2. Düsseldorf: Schwann im Patmos Verlag, pp. 362363.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1968. The Structure of Social Action. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Parsons, Talcott. 1982. On Institutions and Social Evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Partridge, Damani. 2022. Blackness as a Universal Claim. Holocaust Heritage, Noncitizen Futures, and Black Power in Berlin. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Patterson, Michael. 1976. German Theatre Today. Post-war Theatre in West and East Germany, Austria and Northern Switzerland. London: Pitman Publishing.Google Scholar
Peacock, Vita and Kao, Philip. 2013. ‘Introduction: Transcending Structure-Agency in the Study of Organisations’. Anthropology in Action, Special Issue: ‘Study of Organisations’. Ed. V. Peacock. 20 (2): 1–5.Google Scholar
Peirano, Mariza G. S. 1998. ‘When Anthropology Is at Home: The Different Contexts of a Single Discipline’. Annual Review of Anthropology 27: 105128.Google Scholar
Pelka, Artur and Tigges, Stefan. Eds. 2011. Das Drama nach dem Drama. Verwandlungen dramatischer Formen in Deutschland seit 1945. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Penny, H. Glenn. 2021. In Humboldt’s Shadow. A Tragic History of German Ethnology. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Penny, H. Glenn. 2022. German History Unbound. From 1750 to the Present. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Penny, H. Glenn and Bunzl, Matti. 2003. Eds. ‘Introduction: Rethinking German Anthropology, Colonialism, and Race’, in: Worldly Provincialism. German Anthropology in the Age of Empire. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press, pp. 130.Google Scholar
Peukert, Detlev. 1993 [1987]. The Weimar Republic: The Crisis of Classical Modernity. Trans. Richard Deveson. New York: Hill and Wang.Google Scholar
Peymann, Claus. 2015. “Der Renner muss weg!” Interview by Peter Kümmel. Die Zeit. 15/2015. 12 April 2015.Google Scholar
Pfeifer, Anton 2013. ‘Die Kulturpolitik der Bundesregierung unter Helmut Kohl im Zeichen der deutschen und europäischen Einigung’. Historisch-Politische Mitteilungen 12 (1): 241260.Google Scholar
Pinney, Chris and Thomas, Nicholas. 2001. Beyond Esthetics: Art and the Technologies of Enchantment. Oxford: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Piscator, Erwin. 1980 [1929]. The Political Theatre: A History 1914–1929. London: Eyre Methuen.Google Scholar
Plastow, Jane and Boon, Richard. 1998. Theatre Matters: Performance and Culture on the World Stage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Plessner, Helmuth. 1982 [1948]. ‘Zur Anthropologie des Schauspielers’, in: Mit Anderen Augen: Aspekte einer Philosophischen Anthropologie. Berlin: Suhrkamp, pp. 146163.Google Scholar
Presse- und Informationsamt der Bundesregierung. Ed. 1984. Bundeskanzler Helmut Kohl: Reden 1982–1984. Bonn: BPA.Google Scholar
Preuß, Joachim Werner. 2004. Theater im ost-/westpolitischen Umfeld – Nahtstelle Berlin 1945–1961. Munich: Ludicium.Google Scholar
Puchner, Martin. 2011. Stage Fright: Modernism, Anti-Theatricality, and Drama. Baltimore, MD: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 1996. Essays on the Anthropology of Reason. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2018. Unconsable Contemporary. Observing Gerhard Richter. Durham, NC and London: Duke.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul. 2019. ‘Contemporary Counterconduct’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 9 (2): 483491.Google Scholar
Rabinow, Paul and Stavrianakis, Anthony. 2014. Designs on the Contemporary: Anthropological Tests. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1940. ‘Preface’, in: Fortes, Meyer and Evans-Pritchard, Edward E.. Eds. African Political Systems. London: Oxford University Press, pp. xixxi.Google Scholar
Radcliffe-Brown, Alfred R. 1958. Method in Social Anthropology. Ed. Srinivas, M. N.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Raddatz, Frank M. 2006. Botschafter der Sphinx. Zum Verhältnis von Ästhetik und Politik am Theater an der Ruhr. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Raddatz, Frank M. 2010. Der Demetriusplan, oder Wie sich Heiner Mueller den Brechtthron erschlich. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Raddatz, Frank M. 2011. ‘Vision Ciulli’. Theater der Zeit (January 2011): 14–16.Google Scholar
Raman, Bhavani. 2010. ‘Disciplining the Senses, Schooling the Mind: Inhabiting Virtue in the Tamil Tinnai School’, in: Pandian, Anand and Ali, Daud. Eds. Ethical Life in South Asia. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, pp. 4360.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques. 2004. The Politics of Aesthetics: The Distribution of the Sensible. Trans. with an introduction by Gabriel Rockhill. London and New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
Rancière, Jacques and Panagia, Davide. 2000. ‘Dissenting Words: A Conversation with Jacques Rancière’. Diacritics 30 (2): 113126.Google Scholar
Raposo, Paulo. 2015. ‘“Artivismo”: articulando dissidências, criando insurgências’. Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia 4 (2): 312.Google Scholar
Rauterberg, Hanno. 2015. Die Kunst und das gute Leben. Über die Ethik der Ästhetik. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2012 [1995]. Die Erfindung der Kreativität. Berlin: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Reed, Adam. 2011. Literature and Agency in English Fiction Reading: A Study of the Henry Williamson Society. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Reed-Danahay, D. E. Ed. 1997. Auto/Ethnography: Revisiting the Self and the Social. New York: Berg.Google Scholar
Reger, Erik. 1926. ‘Soziologie des Theaters im Industriebezirk’. Die Scene 16: 260264.Google Scholar
Reill, Peter Hanns. 1975. The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Ricoeur, Paul. 1981. Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ringel, Felix. 2014. ‘Post-Industrial Times and the Unexpected: Endurance and Sustainability in Germany’s Fastest-Shrinking City’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20 (S1): 5270.Google Scholar
Rixecker, Manfred. 1997. ‘Umbau des Solbads, 1994–1997’, in: Festschrift zur Eröffnung des Theater an der Ruhr im Raffelbergpark. 10 October 1997. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, pp. 89.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2006. Becoming Sinners: Christianity and Moral Torment in a Papua New Guinea Society. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2012. ‘On Becoming Ethical Subjects: Freedom, Constraint, and the Anthropology of Morality’. Anthropology of This Century 5 (5 October 2012). www.aotcpress.com/articles/ethical-subjects-freedom-constraint-anthropology-morality (last accessed 23 March 2023).Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2013. ‘Beyond the Suffering Subject: Toward an Anthropology of the Good’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 19 (3): 447462.Google Scholar
Robbins, Joel. 2016. ‘What Is the Matter with Transcendence? On the Place of Religion in the New Anthropology of Ethics’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 22: 767808.Google Scholar
Rodnick, David 1948. Postwar Germans, an Anthropologist’s Account. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Douglas. 2012. ‘The Materiality of the Corporation: Oil, Gas, and Corporate Social Technologies in the Remaking of a Russian Region’. American Ethnologist 39 (2): 284296.Google Scholar
Rogers, Douglas. 2015. The Depths of Russia: Oil, Power, and Culture after Socialism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rosaldo, Renato. 1986. ‘From the Door of His Tent: The Fieldworker and the Inquisitor’, in: Clifford, James and Marcus, George E.. Eds. Writing Culture: The Poetics and Politics of Ethnography. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press, pp. 7797.Google Scholar
Roselt, Jens. 2009. ‘Vom Diener zum Despoten. Zur Vorgeschichte der modernen Theaterregie im 19. Jahrhundert’, in: Gronemeyer, Nicole and Stegemann, Bernd. Eds. Regie. Lektionen 2. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, pp. 2337.Google Scholar
Roselt, Jens and Weiler, Christel. Eds. 2011. Schauspielen Heute. Die Bildung des Menschen in den Performativen Künsten. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Rossmann, Andreas. 1998. ‘Musik der Seidenstraße. Ein anderer Iran: Sufis aus Isfahan in Mülheim an der Ruhr’. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 20 January 1998.Google Scholar
Rossmann, Andreas. 2012. Der Rauch verbindet die Städte nicht mehr. Cologne: Buchhandlung Walther König.Google Scholar
Roth, Joseph. ‘Der Rauch verbindet die Städte’. Frankfurter Zeitung. 18 March 1926.Google Scholar
Royce, Anya Peterson. 2004. Anthropology of the Performing Arts: Artistry, Virtuosity, and Interpretation in a Cross-Cultural Perspective. New York: Alta Mira Press.Google Scholar
Rucht, Dieter. Ed. 2003. Berlin, 1. Mai 2002. Politische Demonstrationsrituale. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag.Google Scholar
Ruehl, Martin. 2015. The Italian Renaissance in the German Historical Imagination, 1860–1930. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rühle, Günther. 2012. Theater in Deutschland, 1945–1966. Frankfurt am Main: S. Fischer.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, Lucia. 2017. ‘Introduction: Towards and Ethics of Gesture’. Performance Philosophy 3: 422.Google Scholar
Ruprecht, Lucia. 2019. Gestural Imaginaries. Dance and Cultural Theory in the Early Twentieth Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Rutten, Kris, van Dienderen, An, and Soetaert, Ronald. 2013. ‘Revisiting the Ethnographic Turn in Contemporary Art’. Critical Arts: South-North Cultural and Media Studies 27 (5): 459473.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. 1978. Orientalism. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Sansi, Roger. 2007. Fetishes and Monuments: Afro-Brazilian Art and Culture in the 20th Century. Oxford and New York: Berghahn.Google Scholar
Sansi, Roger. 2008. ‘Review: Svašek, Maruška. Anthropology, Art and Cultural Production’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 14 (1): 203204.Google Scholar
Sansi, Roger. 2015. Art, Anthropology and the Gift. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Sansi, Roger and Strathern, Marilyn. 2016. ‘Art and Anthropology after Relations’. HAU: Journal of Ethnographic Theory 6 (2): 425439.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Gisèle. 2014. La sociologie de la littérature. Collection ‘Repères’. Paris: La Découverte.Google Scholar
Sax, William S. 2002. Dancing the Self: Personhood and Performance in the Pāṇḍav līlā of Garhwal. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Helmut. 1983. ‘Gegen einen handwerklichen Bürgersinn’, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Ed. Heft 3. Botho Strauss: Gross und Klein. Ein Sommernachtstraum in der Kritik. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Helmut. 1997. ‘Aufforderung zum Traum’, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Ed. Festschrift zur Eröffnung des Theater an der Ruhr im Raffelbergpark. 10 October 1997. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, p. 3.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Helmut. 2011. ‘Dramaturgie ist keine Übersetzerwerkstatt. Eine philosophische Reflexion’, in: Roeder, A. and Zehelein, K.. Eds. Die Kunst der Dramaturgie. Theorie-Praxis-Ausbildung. Leipzig: Henschel, pp. 2024.Google Scholar
Schebera, Jürgen and Schrader, Bäbel. 1988. ‘The Golden Twenties’: Art and Literature in the Weimar Republic. New Haven, CT and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1969. Public Domain: Essays on the Theater. Indianapolis, IN: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1977. Essays on Performance Theory. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Schechner, Richard. 1985. Between Theater and Anthropology. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Scheper-Hughes, Nancy. 1995. ‘The Primacy of the Ethical: Propositions for a Militant Anthropology’. Current Anthropology 36: 409420.Google Scholar
Scheytt, Oliver. 2006. ‘Blicke zurück nach vorn – Von der neuen zur aktivierenden Kulturpolitik’. Kulturpolitische Mitteilungen 113 (II/2006): 2937.Google Scholar
Scheytt, Oliver. 2008. Kulturstaat Deutschland. Plädoyer für eine aktivierende Kulturpolitik. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. 1785 [1784]. Die Schaubühne als eine moralische Anstalt betrachtet. Eine Vorlesung, gehalten zu Mannheim in der öffentlichen Sitzung der kurpfälzischen deutschen Gesellschaft am 26sten des Junius 1784. Thalia. 1. Band. Heft 1. Leipzig: G. J. Göschen’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung, pp. 127. www.projekt-gutenberg.org/schiller/anstalt/anstalt.html (last accessed 26 August 2022).Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. 1983 [1794]. On the Aesthetic Education of Man in a Series of Letters. Ed. and trans. Wilkinson, E. M. and Willoughby, L. A.. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Schiller, Friedrich. 2000 [1794]. Über die ästhetische Erziehung des Menschen. Ed. , Klaus L. Berghahn. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Schipper, Imanuel. 2012. Ästhetik versus Authentizität: Reflexionen über die Darstellung von und mit Behinderung. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1966. Studien zur Geschichte und Politik. Ed. Behler, Ernst. Munich: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schlegel, Friedrich. 1967 [1796–1801]. Charakteristiken und Kritiken I (1796–1801). Ed. Eichner, Hans. Vol. 2 of Kritische Friedrich Schlegel-Ausgabe. Ed. Ernst Beler, Jean-Jacques Anstett and Hans Eichner. Munich: Schöningh.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Dietmar N. 2003. ‘Ein starkes Stück Kunst. Schauspiel im Revier’, in: Wilamowski, Gerd, Hellen, Dieter, and Bourrée, Manfred. Eds. KulturKontrovers. RuhrStadt. Essen: Klartext, pp. 498513.Google Scholar
Schmitz, André 2012. ‘Schlechte Patrioten. Deutschland braucht seine Theater, Opern und Museen – und zwar alle’. Der Spiegel. 19 March 2012: 118–120.Google Scholar
Schmidt, Theron. 2010. ‘“We say sorry”: Apology, the Law and Theatricality’. Law Text Culture 14 (1): 5578.Google Scholar
Schönfeld, Christiane. Ed. 2005. Practicing Modernity: Female Creativity in the Weimar Republic. Würzburg: Königshausen & Neumann.Google Scholar
Schneewind, Jerome Borges 1991. ‘MacIntyre and the Indispensability of Tradition’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 51 (1): 165168.Google Scholar
Schneider, Wolfgang. Ed. 2009. Theater und Schule. Ein Handbuch zur kulturellen Bildung. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Schneider, Wolfgang. Ed. 2011. Theater und Migration. Herausforderungen für Kulturpolitik und Theaterpraxis. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Schneider, Arnd. 2015. ‘Towards a New Hermeneutics of Art and Anthropology Collaborations’. EthnoScripts 17 (1): 2330.Google Scholar
Schneider, Arnd and Wright, Christopher. Eds. 2006. Contemporary Art and Anthropology. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Schneider, Arnd and Wright, Christopher. Eds. Eds. 2010. Between Art and Anthropology. Oxford: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
Schneider, Arnd and Wright, Christopher. Eds. Eds. 2013. Anthropology and Art Practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Schwarz, Hans-Peter. 2008. Axel Springer. Die Biografie. Berlin: Propyläen Verlag.Google Scholar
Scott, James. 1985. Weapons of the Weak: Everyday Forms of Peasant Resistance. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, Richard. 2001. Institutions and Organisations. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Searle, John. 1969. Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Seidl, Rupert. 2012. ‘Darum reisen wir!’. Blog entry. Warum reisen wir? Das Onlinetagebuch des Theater an der Ruhr. 26 November 2012. www.theater-an-der-ruhr-blog.org/2012/11/26/darum-reisen-wir/ (last accessed 10 August 2021).Google Scholar
Selbourne, David. 1982. The Making of A Midsummer Night’s Dream: An Eyewitness Account of Peter Brook’s Production from First Rehearsal to First Night. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Senelick, Laurence. 2008. ‘The Homosexual Theatre Movement in the Weimar Republic’. Theatre Survey 49 (1): 535.Google Scholar
Sennett, Richard. 1998. The Corrosion of Character: The Personal Consequences of Work in the New Capitalism. London and New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Sharifi, Azadeh. 2017. ‘Theater and Migration – Documentation, Influences and Perspectives in European Theatre’, in: Brauneck, Manfred. Ed. Independent Theatre in Contemporary Europe; Structures – Aesthetics – Cultural Policy. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 321416Google Scholar
Sharifi, Azadeh and Skwirblies, Lisa. Eds. 2022. Theaterwissenschaft postkolonial/dekolonial. Eine kritische Bestandsaufnahme. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Siegenthaler, Fiona. 2013. ‘Towards an Ethnographic Turn in Contemporary Art Scholarship’. Critical Arts: South–North Cultural and Media Studies 27 (6): 737752.Google Scholar
Sievers, Norbert. 2010. Kulturbericht. Nordrhein-Westfalen Landeskulturförderung 2009. Düsseldorf: Kulturabteilung der Staatskanzlei.Google Scholar
Sievers, Norbert and Wagner, Bernd. 1992. ‘Einleitung: Soziokultur und Kulturpolitik’, in: Sievers, Norbert and Wagner, Bernd. Eds. Bestandsaufnahme Soziokultur. Beiträge, Analysen, Konzepte. Schriftenreihe des Bundesministeriums des Innern. Berlin: Verlag W. Kohlhammer, pp. 113.Google Scholar
Sievers, Norbert and Wagner, Bernd. Eds. 2012. Neue Kulturpolitik der Länder. Jahrbuch für Kulturpolitik 2012. Essen: Klartext Verlag.Google Scholar
Silberman, Marc. 2003. ‚Gestus‘, in: Koch, Gerd and Streisand, Marianne. Eds. Wörterbuch (der) Theaterpädagogik. Milow: Schibri. (entry accessed online: www.archiv-datp.de/worterbuch-gestus-2/, 20 August 2022).Google Scholar
Simmel, Georg. 1968. The Conflict in Modern Culture and Other Essays. Trans. K. Peter Etzkorn. New York: Teachers University Press.Google Scholar
Singer, Otto. 1993. ‘Policy Communities und Diskurs-Koalitionen: Experten und Expertise in der Wirtschaftspolitik’. Policy-Analyse. Kritik und Neuorientierung 24: 149174.Google Scholar
Singer, Otto. 2003. ‘Kulturpolitik und Parlament. Kulturpolitische Debatten in der Bundesrepublik Deutschland seit 1945’. Wissenschaftliche Dienste des Deutschen Bundestages. Fachbereich X: Kultur und Medien. Bundestag, Berlin. Reg. Nr.: WF X – 078/03.Google Scholar
Spencer, Herbert. 1971. Structure, Function and Evolution. Ed. Andreski, S.. London: Michael Joseph.Google Scholar
Spenkuch, Hartwin. 2012. ‘Preußen als Kulturstaat – Begriff, realhistorische Ausprägung und Akteure (1815–1914)’, in: Ther, Philipp. Ed. Kulturpolitik und Theater. Die kontinentalen Imperien in Europa im Vergleich. Vienna, Cologne, and Weimar: Böhlau, pp. 99126.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Hubert. 1999a. ‘Parkplatz am Südpol. Irans Intellektuelle zwanzig Jahre nach der Revolution’. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 10 February 1999.Google Scholar
Spiegel, Hubert. 1999b: ‘Expeditionsleiter’. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung, 26 February 1999.Google Scholar
Ssorin-Chaikov, Nikolai. 2013. ‘Ethnographic Conceptualism: An Introduction’. Laboratorium 5 (2): 518.Google Scholar
Stanislavski, Constantin. 2003 [1936]. An Actor Prepares. Trans. Elizabeth Reynolds Hapgood. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Stanislavski, Constantin. 2016 [1950]. Building a Character. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stanislavski, Constantin. 2015 [1981]. Creating a Role. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Stasch, Rupert. 2009. Society of Others: Kinship and Mourning in a West Papuan Place. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Stegemann, Bernd. 2015. Lob des Realismus. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Stevenson, Mark A. 1999. ‘German Cultural Policy and Neo-Liberal Zeitgeist’. PoLAR 22 (2): 6479.Google Scholar
Stewart, Lizzie. 2021. Performing New German Realities: Turkish-German Scripts of Postmigration. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Strasberg, Lee. 1987. A Dream of Passion. The Development of the Method. Toronto: Little, Brown & Co.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1995. The Relation: Issues in Complexity and Scale. Cambridge: Prickly Pear Press.Google Scholar
Strathern, Marilyn. 1996. ‘Cutting the Network’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 2 (3): 517535.Google Scholar
Styan, John L. 1983. Modern Drama in Theory and Practice, Vol. 3. Expressionism and Epic Theatre. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Svašek, Maruška. 2007. Anthropology, Art and Cultural Production. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
Swales, Martin. 1978. ‘Review of The German Tradition of Self-Cultivation (Bruford, 1975) and The German Enlightenment and the Rise of Historicism (Reill 1975)’. Journal of Modern History 50 (2): 372374.Google Scholar
Taylor, Diana. 2003. The Archive and the Repertoire: Performing Cultural Memory in the Americas. Durham, NC and London: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Tenfelde, Klaus. 2006. ‘Vom Ende und Anfang sozialer Ungleichheit. Das Ruhrgebiet in der Nachkriegszeit’. Geschichte und Gesellschaft 22: 269285.Google Scholar
Terheyden, Henrike. 2013. ‘Gegen die Reproduktion rassistischer Zeichen’. Kendike Personal Blog. https://kendike.wordpress.com/2013/05/26/gegen-die-reproduktion-rassistischer-zeichen/ (last accessed 24 May 2022).Google Scholar
Ther, Philipp. 2012. Kulturpolitik und Theater. Die kontinentalen Imperien in Europa im Vergleich. Vienna, Cologne, and Weimar: Böhlau.Google Scholar
Thompson, James. 2011. Performance Affects: Applied Theatre and the End of Effect. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Throsby, David C. 1994. ‘The Production and Consumption of the Arts: A View of Cultural Economics’. Journal of Economic Literature 32: 129.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2012. ‘Art in Adorno’s Ethical Thought: Negative Utopias in a Wrong Life’. Cambridge Humanities Review 2: 59.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015a. ‘Bilder, Reisen und Theaterlandschaft: Roberto Ciullis Theater an der Ruhr’, in: Schirmer, Lothar. Ed. Aspekte des deutschen Theaters im 20. Jahrhundert. Berlin: Gesellschaft für Theatergeschichte, pp. 127151.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015b. ‘Institutional Formation and Artistic Critique in German Ensemble Theatre’. Performance Research. Special Issue: ‘On Institutions’. Ed. Gigi Argyropoulou and Hypatia Vourloumis. 20 (4): 71–77.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015c. ‘Authorisation’. Glossary entry. Performance Research. Special Issue: ‘On Institutions’. Ed. Gigi Argyropoulou and Hypatia Vourloumis. 20 (4): 129.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015d. ‘Between Professional Precariousness and Creative Self-Organisation: The Free Performing Arts Scene in Germany’, in: Gielen, Pascal and Dockx, Nico. Eds. Mobile Autonomy: Exercises in Artists’ Self-Organisation. Amsterdam: Valiz, pp. 171193.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015e. ‘Aesthetic, Ethics, and Engagement: Self-Cultivation as the Politics of Refugee Theatre’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development: The Transformative Potential of Performance. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171202.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015f. ‘Activism and Autonomy, Political Aesthetics and Aesthetic Politics’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development. The Transformative Potential of Theatre. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 259263.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015g. ‘Ethical Self-Cultivation as the Politics of Engaged Theatre. How Theatre Engages Refugee Politics’, in: Flynn, Alex and Tinius, Jonas. Eds. Anthropology, Theatre, and Development. The Transformative Potential of Theatre. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 171202.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2015h. ‘“15 Minutes”. Artistic Responses to German Refugee Temporalities’. Allegra Lab. https://allegralaboratory.net/15-minutes-artistic-responses-to-german-refugee-temporalities-refugees (last accessed 20 August 2022).Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2016a. ‘Rehearsing Detachment: Dialectical Fiction and the Impossible Political Utopia of Refugee Theatre’. Journal of Art and Anthropology/Cadernos de Arte e Antropologia 5 (1): 2138.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2016b. ‘Authenticity and Otherness: Reflecting State(lessness) in German Postmigrant Theatre’. Critical Stages/Scènes Critiques 14/2016.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2017a. ‘Art as Ethical Practice: Anthropological Observations on and beyond Theatre’. World Art 7: 227–51.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2017b. ‘Anthropologische Beobachtungen zu künstlerischer Subjektivierung und institutioneller Reflexivität: Das Theaterprojekt Ruhrorter mit Geflüchteten am Theater an der Ruhr’, in: Matthias Warstat et al. Eds. Applied Theatre. Berlin: Theater der Zeit, S. 205–235.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2020a., Die Ethnografie as Methode der Theaterwissenschaften?’, in: Balme, Christopher and Szymanski-Düll, Berenika. Eds. Methoden der Theaterwissenschaft. Forum Modernes Theater Schriftenreihe. Tübingen: Narr, pp. 313334.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2020b., Ein gemeinsames Denken zwischen und jenseits von Anthropologie und Theater (Vorbemerkung)‘, in: Tinius, Jonas and Wewerka, Alexander. Eds. Der fremde Blick. Roberto Ciulli und das Theater an der Ruhr. Berlin: Alexander Verlag, pp. 185189.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2021a. ‘Il palazzo dell dubbio’. Art e Dossier. September 2021. 390: 38–43.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2021b. ‘The Anthropologist as Sparring Partner: Instigative Public Fieldwork, Curatorial Collaboration, and German Colonial Heritage’. Berliner Blätter. Ethnographische und Ethnologische Beiträge 83: 6585.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. 2022. ‘Dis-Othering Diversity: Troubling Differences in a Berlin-Brussels Afropolitan Curatorial Collaboration’, in: Macdonald, Sharon. Ed. Doing Diversity in Museums and Heritage. A Berlin Ethnography. Bielefeld: Transcript, pp. 157172.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas. Forthcoming. ‘Fieldwork as Method in Theatre and Performance Scholarship’, in: Davis, Tracy C. and Rae, Paul. Eds. Mixing Methods in Performance Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (in press)Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas and Ruba, Totah. Eds. 2020. ‘Problematising PostHeimat’. PostHeimat Research Platform. https://postheimat.com/research-en/ (last accessed 19 May 2023).Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas and Ruba, Totah. Eds. Forthcoming. PostHeimat. Inquiries into Migration, Theatre, and Networked Solidarity. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Tinius, Jonas and Wewerka, Alexander. Eds. 2020. Der Fremde Blick. Roberto Ciulli und das Theater an der Ruhr. 2 Vols. Berlin: Alexander Verlag.Google Scholar
Tönnies, Ferdinand von. 1887. Gemeinschaft und Gesellschaft. Leipzig: Fues. [Published in English as Community and Society. Trans. and ed. Charles P. Loomis. East Lansing: Michigan State University Press, 1957.]Google Scholar
Torch, Chris. 2001. ‘Drei Instinkte. Reflektionen über das Theater an der Ruhr’. Trans. Helmut Schäfer and Annette Heilmann, in: Theater an der Ruhr. Zwanzig Jahre. Mülheim: Theater an der Ruhr, p. 25.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1974. The Forest of Symbols: Aspects of Ndembu Ritual. Ithaca, NY and London: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Turner, Victor. 1986. The Anthropology of Performance. New York: PAJ Publications.Google Scholar
Umathum, Sandra and Wihstutz, Benjamin. 2015. Disabled Theater. Berlin and Zurich: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
van Eikels, Kai. 2013. Die Kunst des Kollektiven. Performance zwischen Theater, Politik und Sozio-Ökonomie. Munich: Wilhelm Fink Verlag.Google Scholar
Varnhagen von Ense, Karl August 1867. Aus dem Nachlass. Ed. Assing, Ludmilla. Band 1. Leipzig: Brockhaus.Google Scholar
Venkatesan, Soumhya. 2015. ‘There is No Such Thing as the Good: The 2013 Meeting of the Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory’. Critique of Anthropology 35 (4): 430480.Google Scholar
Verdery, Katherine 1991. National Ideology under Socialism. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Vermeersch, Etienne. 1977. ‘An Analysis of the Concept of Culture’, in: Bernardi, Bernardo Ed. The Concept and Dynamics of Culture. The Hague: Mouton Publishers, pp. 973.Google Scholar
Vertovec, Steven. 2015. ‘Germany’s Second Turning-Point: Long-Term Effects of the Refugee Crisis’. openDemocracy, 30 September.Google Scholar
Vietta, Egon. 1955. Darmstädter Gespräch: Theater. Darmstadt: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt GmbH.Google Scholar
von Sydow, Anna. Ed. 1935. Wilhelm und Karoline von Humboldt in ihren Briefen. Gekürzte Volksausgabe. 1 Band. 2. Berlin: Auflage.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 1989. ‘For a Socio-Analysis of Intellectuals: On ‘Homo Academicus’. An Interview with Pierre Bourdieu. Berkeley Journal of Sociology 34: 129.Google Scholar
Wacquant, Loïc. 2007. Body and Soul: Notebooks of an Apprentice Boxer. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wagenknecht, Sarah. 2012. Freiheit statt Kapitalismus. Über vergessene Ideale, die Eurokrise und unsere Zukunft. Frankfurt am Main: Campus Verlag.Google Scholar
Wagner, Bernd. 1993. ‘Die “neue Kulturpolitik” und das “neue Interesse” an der Kultur’. Kulturpolitische Mitteilungen 61/62 (1&2): 917.Google Scholar
Wahl, Christine. 2013. ‘“Ein Brennglas theatraler Entwicklungen.” 50 Jahre Theatertreffen’. Goethe-Institut Online. June 2015. www.goethe.de/de/kul/tut/gen/tup/20364499.html (last accessed 29 October 2015).Google Scholar
Waldenfels, Bernhard. 1980. Der Spielraum des Verhaltens. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Walley, Christine J. 2013. Exit Zero: Family and Class in Postindustrial Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Warstat, Matthias et al. Eds. 2017. Applied Theatre. Frames and Positions. Berlin: Theater der Zeit.Google Scholar
Watson, Ian. 2002. Negotiating Cultures: Eugenio Barba and the Intercultural Debate. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1904. ‘Die “Objektivität” sozialwissenschaftlicher und sozialpolitischer Erkenntnis’. Archiv für Sozialwissenschaft und Sozialpolitik 19 (1904): 2287.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1946. ‘The Sociology of Charismatic Authority’, in: Gerth, Hans H. and Wright Mills, C.. Eds. From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 245252.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1968. On Charisma and Institution Building. Ed. Eisenstadt, S. N.. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1992 [1919]. Politik als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1995 [1919]. Wissenschaft als Beruf. Stuttgart: Reclam.Google Scholar
Weiner, Annette B. 1992. Inalienable Possessions: The Paradox of Keeping-While Giving. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weiner, James. Ed. 1994. Aesthetics Is a Cross-Cultural Category. Manchester: Group for Debates in Anthropological Theory.Google Scholar
Weißköppel, Cordula 2009. ‘Traversing Cultural Sites: Doing Ethnography among Sudanese Migrants in Germany’, in: Falzon, Mark-Anthony. Ed. Multi-Sited Ethnography: Theory, Praxis and Locality in Contemporary Research. Farnham: Ashgate, pp. 251270.Google Scholar
Wellmon, Chad. 2010. Becoming Human: Romantic Anthropology and the Embodiment of Freedom. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Weszkalnys, Gesa. 2010. Berlin, Alexanderplatz: Transforming Place in a Unified Germany. New York: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
Whaley, Joachim. 2012. Germany and the Holy Roman Empire, Vol. II. The Peace of Westphalia to the Dissolution of the Reich, 1648–1806. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Wiggershaus, Rolf. 2008 [1988]. Die Frankfurter Schule. Geschichte/Theoretische Entwicklung/ Politische Bedeutung. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.Google Scholar
Wihstutz, Benjamin. 2012. Der andere Raum. Politiken sozialer Grenzverhandlungen im Gegenwartstheater. Zurich: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
Wihstutz, Benjamin. 2015. ‘Schillers transformative Ästhetik oder: Urteilen in Weimar’. Unpublished manuscript. www.academia.edu/12507616/Schillers_Transformative_Ästhetik_oder_Urteilen_in_Weimar (last accessed 21 May 2022).Google Scholar
Wihstutz, Benjamin and Hoesch, Benjamin. Eds. 2020. Neue Methoden der Theaterwissenschaft. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
Wiles, John. 2011. Theatre and Citizenship. The History of a Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Willett, John. 1978. Art and Politics in the Weimar Period. London: Thames and Hudson.Google Scholar
Willett, John. 1988. The Theater of the Weimar Republic. New York and London: Holmes & Meier.Google Scholar
Willett, John. 1998 [1984]. Brecht in Context. Rev. Edn. London and New York: Bloomsbury/Methuen.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1985. Ethics and the Limits of Philosophy. London: Collins.Google Scholar
Williams, Raymond. 1983 [1958]. Culture and Society (1780–1955). New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wilmer, Stephen. 2018. ‘The Institutional Response of the German Theatre’, in: Performing Statelessness in Europe. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 189208.Google Scholar
Winch, Christopher. 2010. Dimensions of Expertise: A Conceptual Exploration of Vocational Knowledge. London: Continuum.Google Scholar
Witkin, Robert 1995. Art and Social Structure. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Witkin, Robert 2005. ‘A “New” Paradigm for a Sociology of Aesthetics’, in: Inglis, D. and Hughson, J.. Eds. The Sociology of Art: Ways of Seeing. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp. 5772.Google Scholar
Woolf, Brendan. 2021. Institutional Theatrics. Performing Arts Policy in Post-Wall Berlin. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Susan. 1994. ‘“Culture” in Anthropology and Organizational Studies’, in: Wright, Susan. Ed. Anthropology of Organizations. London and New York: Routledge, pp. 131.Google Scholar
Wulf, Joseph. 1966. Theater und Film im Dritten Reich: Eine Dokumentation. Schleswig: Rowohlt Verlag.Google Scholar
Yurdakul, Gökçe, Römhild, Regina, Schwanhäußer, Anja, Nieden, Biergit zur. Eds. 2017. Witnessing the Transition: Moments in the Long Summer of Migration. Berlin: Berlin Institute for empirical Integration and Migration Research (BIM).Google Scholar
Zigon, Jarrett. 2007. ‘Moral Breakdown and Ethical Demand: A Theoretical Framework for an Anthropology of Moralities’. Anthropological Theory 7: 131150.Google Scholar
Zigon, Jarrett. 2012. ‘Narratives’, in: Fassin, Didier. Ed. A Companion to Moral Anthropology. Chichester: Wiley & Sons, pp. 204220.Google Scholar
Zigon, Jarrett. 2014. ‘An Ethics of Dwelling and a Politics of World-Building: A Critical Response to Ordinary Ethics’. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute 20: 746764.Google Scholar
Zilch, Reinhold and Neugebauer, Wolfgang. Eds. 2014. Finanzierung des Kulturstaats in Preußen seit 1800. Berlin, Boston, and Munich: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, Andrew. 2001. Anthropology and Antihumanism in Imperial Germany. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Zimmermann, Olaf and Geißler, Theo. Eds. 2008. Kulturpolitik der Parteien. Visionen, Programmatik, Geschichte und Differenzen. Berlin: Deutscher Kulturrat.Google Scholar