Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-nptnm Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-07T02:19:11.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

13 - Constitutional Environmental Human Rights: A Descriptive Analysis of 142 National Constitutions

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2013

Lanse Minkler
Affiliation:
University of Connecticut
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Environmental human rights, succinctly defined as entitlements to clean air, water, and soil for present and future generations (Hiskes 2009), have both conceptual and legal foundations (Sax 1990). These rights fit within the basic rights framework outlined by Shue (1996), most notably subsistence rights. Without clean air, water, and soil, humans will be unable to enjoy other rights and life activities (Collins-Chobanian 2000). Because pollution does not respect geographic and, especially, temporal borders, environmental human rights necessitate a deeper concern for the rights of future generations. Recognizing these unique characteristics of environmental degradation, the first principle of The Stockholm Declaration of 1972 notes the responsibility humans have to protect the environment for both present and future generations. Although its signatories are not legally bound to uphold its principles, much of the language of the declaration forms the basis for modern binding and nonbinding instruments and declarations concerning the environment including, but not limited to, The African Charter of Human and People's Rights, the Brundtland Report, and the Ksentini Report (Hiskes 2011). Given these foundations, environmental human rights impose specific duties and obligations on governments, and have vast implications for government efforts to respect, protect, and fulfill said rights, including the nature of interference and definition of rights violations.

Governments seem to take these obligations seriously, as the world has seen a significant increase in the number of multinational and bilateral treaties and declarations concerned with recognizing a human right to a safe, healthy, or clean environment (Herz 2000; Hiskes 2011). This is also true for the human right to water (Scanlon, Cassar, and Nemes 1999). However, the question remains to what extent governments are trying to formalize and institutionalize these rights in national policy and law. Evidence of government effort can be found by looking closely at national constitutions, the topic of this chapter.

Type
Chapter
Information
The State of Economic and Social Human Rights
A Global Overview
, pp. 329 - 364
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barrett, C., 1996. “Fairness, Stewardship and Sustainable Development,” Ecological Economics, 19(1): 11–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beckerman, W., 1997. “Debate: Intergenerational Equity and the Environment,” Journal of Political Philosophy, 5(4): 392–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins-Chobanian, S., 2000. “Beyond Sax and Welfare Interests,” Environmental Ethics, 22: 133–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gleick, P., 1998. “The Human Right to Water,”Water Policy, 1–5: 487–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G., 1968. “The Tragedy of the Commons,”Science, 162: 1243–1248.Google Scholar
Herz, R., 2000. “Litigating Environmental Abuses Under the Alien Tort Claims Act: A Practical Assessment,” Virginia Journal of International Law 40: 545–632.Google Scholar
Hiskes, R., 2009. The Human Right to a Green Future, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hiskes, R., 2011. “Environmental Human Rights,” in Cushman, Tom (Ed.), Handbook of Human Rights, 399–409, New York: Routledge International Handbooks.Google Scholar
Howarth, R., 1997. “Sustainability as Opportunity,” Land Economics 73(4): 569–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffords, C., and Shah, F., forthcoming. “On the Natural and Economic Difficulties to Fulfilling the Human Right to Water Within a Neoclassical Economics Framework,” Review of Social Economy.
Jung, C., and Rosevear, E., 2011. “Economic and Social Rights in Developing Country Constitutions: Preliminary Report on the TIESR Dataset,” .
Lercher, A., 2007. “Are There Any Environmental Rights?Environmental Values 16(3): 355–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkler, L., 2009. “Economic Rights and Political Decision Making,” Human Rights Quarterly 31(2): 368–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E., 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Padilla, E., 2002. “Intergenerational Equity and Sustainability,” Ecological Economics 41(1): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J., 1999. A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Sax, J., 1990. “The Search for Environmental Rights,” Journal of Land Use and Environmental Law 6: 93–105.Google Scholar
Scanlon, J., Cassar, A., and Nemes, N., 1999. “Water as a Human Right?” UNESCO Courier.
Shelton, D., 1991. “Human Rights, Environmental Rights, and the Right to Environment,” Stanford Journal of International Law 28: 103–138.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K., 2007. “Human Rights and Duties to Alleviate Environmental Injustice: The Domestic Case,” Journal of Human Rights 6(1): 107–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shue, H., 1996. Basic Rights: Subsistence, Affluence, and US Foreign Policy, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Sunstein, C., 2004. The Second Bill of Rights: FDR's Unfinished Revolution and Why We Need it More Than Ever, New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2002. Economic and Social Council Committee on Economic, Social, and Cultural Rights, General Comment No. 15, Geneva: UN.Google Scholar
United Nations, 2010. General Assembly Document A/64/L.63/Rev. 1, (7/26/2010).
Weiss, E., 1992. “In Fairness to Future Generations and Sustainable Development,” American University Journal of International Law and Policy 8: 19.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×