Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-7c2ld Total loading time: 1.097 Render date: 2021-12-06T19:30:02.453Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Experimental design: scaling up in time and space, and its statistical considerations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 May 2010

Werner L. Kutsch
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institut für Biogeochemie, Jena
Michael Bahn
Affiliation:
Leopold-Franzens-Universität Innsbruck, Austria
Andreas Heinemeyer
Affiliation:
Stockholm Environmental Institute, University of York
Get access

Summary

INTRODUCTION

Accurate measurement of the soil CO2 efflux is critical for the assessment of the carbon budget of terrestrial ecosystems, since it is the main pathway for assimilated carbon to return to the atmosphere, and only small changes in the soil CO2 efflux rate might have important implications on the net ecosystem carbon balance. Due to this central role in the terrestrial carbon cycle, soil CO2 efflux has been measured throughout all biomes, and covering all principal vegetation types. Using simplified regressions of soil CO2 efflux measurements reported in the scientific literature, the total amount of carbon emitted as CO2 by soils worldwide has been estimated at approximately 68–80 Pg (1995; Raich et al., 2002), representing the second largest carbon flux between ecosystems and the atmosphere. This amount is more than ten times the current rate of fossil fuel combustion and indicates that each year around 10% of the atmosphere's CO2 cycles through the soil (Prentice et al., 2001). Thus, even a small change in soil respiration could significantly intensify, or mitigate, current atmospheric increases of CO2, with potential feedbacks to climate change. In fact, soils store more than twice as much carbon globally than the atmosphere (Bolin, 2000) and consequently contain a large long-term potential for the carbon cycle climate feedback. Applying results from small-scale experiments to larger areas is necessary in order to understand the potential role of soils in sequestering or releasing carbon under changed climatic conditions, and to inform management and policy makers about likely consequences of land-use changes on carbon fluxes and stocks in specific regions.

Type
Chapter
Information
Soil Carbon Dynamics
An Integrated Methodology
, pp. 34 - 48
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, A. S. and Schlesinger, W. H. (2004) Nutrient limitations to soil microbial biomass and activity in loblolly pine forests. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 581–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atkin, O. K., Edwards, E. J. and Loveys, B. R. (2000) Response of root respiration to changes in temperature and its relevance to global warming. New Phytologist, 147, 141–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bolin, B. (2000) Global perspective. In Land Use, Land Use Change, and Forestry. A Special Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), ed. Watson, R. T., Noble, I. R., Bolin, B., Ravindranath, N. H., Verardo, D. J. and Dokken, D. J.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 23–51.Google Scholar
Buchmann, N. (2000) Biotic and abiotic factors controlling soil respiration rates in Picea abies stands. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 1625–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabrera, R. M. and Saltveit, M. E. (2003) Survey of wound-induced ethylene production by excised root segments. Physiologia Plantarum, 119, 203–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cressie, N. A. C. (1993) Statistics for Spatial Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Mathematical Statistics, Rev. edn. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Davidson, E. A., Savage, K., Verchot, L. V. and Navarro, R. (2002) Minimizing artifacts and biases in chamber-based measurements of soil respiration. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 113, 21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, E. A., Savage, K. E., Trumbore, S. E. and Borken, W. (2006) Vertical partitioning of CO2 production within a temperate forest soil. Global Change Biology, 12, 944–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilly, O. and Nannipieri, P. (2001) Response of ATP content, respiration rate and enzyme activities in an arable and a forest soil to nutrient additions. Biology and Fertility of Soils, 34, 64–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dytham, C. (2003) Choosing and Using Statistics: A Biologist's Guide. Oxford: Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Fang, C. and Moncrieff, J. B. (1998) Simple and fast technique to measure CO2 profiles in soil. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 30, 2107–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fang, C., Smith, P., Moncrieff, J. B. and Smith, J. U. (2005) Similar response of labile and resistant soil organic matter pools to changes in temperature. Nature, 433, 57–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Franzluebbers, A. J., Haney, R. L., Honeycutt, C. W.et al. (2001) Climatic influences on active fractions of soil organic matter. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 33, 1103–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, J. P., Bezdicek, D. F., Flury, M., Albrecht, S. and Smith, J. L. (2006) Microbial activity affected by lime in a long-term no-till soil. Soil and Tillage Research, 88, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, M. H., Ineson, P., Stevenson, A. C. and Howard, D. C. (2001) Terrestrial organic carbon storage in a British moorland. Global Change Biology, 7, 375–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemeyer, A., Ineson, P., Ostle, N. and Fitter, A. H. (2006) Respiration of the external mycelium in the arbuscular mycorrhizal symbiosis shows strong dependence on recent photosynthates and acclimation to temperature. New Phytologist, 171, 159–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinemeyer, A., Hartley, I. P., Evans, S. P., Fuente, J. A. C. and Ineson, P. (2007) Forest soil CO2 flux: uncovering the contribution and environmental responses of ectomycorrhizas. Global Change Biology, 13, 1786–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirano, T. (2005) Seasonal and diurnal variations in topsoil and subsoil respiration under snowpack in a temperate deciduous forest – art. no. GB2011. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 19, B2011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Högberg, P., Buchmann, N. and Read, D. J. (2006) Comments on Yakov Kuzyakov's review ‘Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods’ (Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 425–48). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 2997–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurlbert, S. H. (1984) Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments. Ecological Monographs, 54, 187–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Janssens, I. A., Kowalski, A. S., Longdoz, B. and Ceulemans, R. (2000) Assessing forest soil CO2 efflux: an in situ comparison of four techniques. Tree Physiology, 20, 23–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jenny, H. (1980) The soil resource: origin and behaviour. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaye, J. P. and Hart, S. C. (1998) Restoration and canopy-type effects on soil respiration in a ponderosa pine–bunchgrass ecosystem. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 62, 1062–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. (2006a) Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 425–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuzyakov, Y. (2006b) Response to the comments by Peter Högberg, Nina Buchmann and David J. Read on the review ‘Sources of CO2 efflux from soil and review of partitioning methods’ (Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 425–48). Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 38, 2999–3000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladegaard-Pedersen, P., Elberling, B. and Vesterdal, L. (2005) Soil carbon stocks, mineralization rates, and CO2 effluxes under 10 tree species on contrasting soil types. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 35, 1277–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Law, B. E., Baldocchi, D. D. and Anthoni, P. M. (1999) Below-canopy and soil CO2 fluxes in a ponderosa pine forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 94, 171–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leifeld, J. and Fuhrer, J. (2005) The temperature response of CO2 production from bulk soils and soil fractions is related to soil organic matter quality. Biogeochemistry, 75, 433–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liang, N. S., Nakadai, T., Hirano, T.et al. (2004) In situ comparison of four approaches to estimating soil CO2 efflux in a northern larch (Larix kaempferi Sarg.) forest. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 123, 97–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBratney, A. B., Odeh, I. O. A., Bishop, T. F. A., Dunbar, M. S. and Shatar, T. M. (2000) An overview of pedometric techniques for use in soil survey. Geoderma, 97, 293–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McBratney, A. B., Santos, M. L. M. and Minasny, B. (2003) On digital soil mapping. Geoderma, 117, 3–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, A. E., Schimel, J. P., Meixner, T., Sickman, J. O. and Melack, J. M. (2005) Episodic rewetting enhances carbon and nitrogen release from chaparral soils. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 2195–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monson, R. K., Lipson, D. L., Burns, S. P.et al. (2006) Winter forest soil respiration controlled by climate and microbial community composition. Nature, 439, 711–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nunan, N., Wu, K., Young, I. M., Crawford, J. W. and Ritz, K. (2002) In situ spatial patterns of soil bacterial populations, mapped at multiple scales, in an arable soil. Microbial Ecology, 44, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oorts, K., Bronckaers, H. and Smolders, E. (2006) Discrepancy of the microbial response to elevated copper between freshly spiked and long-term contaminated soils. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, 25, 845–53.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, T. B. and Kaspar, T. C. (2004) Temporal variability of soil carbon dioxide flux: effect of sampling frequency on cumulative carbon loss estimation. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 68, 1234–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Person, T., Karlsson, P. S., Sjöberg, R. M. and Rudebeck, A. (2000) Carbon mineralization in European forest soils. Ecological Studies, 142, 257–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prentice, I. C., Farquar, G. D. and Fasham, M. J. R. (2001) The carbon cycle and atmospheric carbon dioxide. In Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Third Assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 183–237.Google Scholar
Pumpanen, J., Ilvesniemi, H., Peramaki, M. and Hari, P. (2003) Seasonal patterns of soil CO2 efflux and soil air CO2 concentration in a Scots pine forest: comparison of two chamber techniques. Global Change Biology, 9, 371–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W. and Potter, C. S. (1995) Global patterns of carbon dioxide emissions from soils. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 9, 23–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raich, J. W., Potter, C. S. and Bhagawati, D. (2002) Interannual variability in global soil respiration, 1980–94. Global Change Biology, 8, 800–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rajapaksha, R., Tobor-Kaplon, M. A. and Baath, E. (2004) Metal toxicity affects fungal and bacterial activities in soil differently. Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 70, 2966–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rayment, M. B. and Jarvis, P. G. (2000) Temporal and spatial variation of soil CO2 efflux in a Canadian boreal forest. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 32, 35–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Rey, A., Freibauer, A.et al. (2003) Modeling temporal and large-scale spatial variability of soil respiration from soil water availability, temperature and vegetation productivity indices – art. no. 1104. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 17, 1104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reichstein, M., Subke, J. A., Angeli, A. C. and Tenhunen, J. D. (2005) Does the temperature sensitivity of decomposition of soil organic matter depend upon water content, soil horizon, or incubation time?Global Change Biology, 11, 1754–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reth, S., Reichstein, M. and Falge, E. (2005) The effect of soil water content, soil temperature, soil pH-value and the root mass on soil CO2 efflux: a modified model. Plant and Soil, 268, 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, K. E. and Davidson, E. A. (2003) A comparison of manual and automated systems for soil CO2 flux measurements: trade-offs between spatial and temporal resolution. Journal of Experimental Botany, 54, 891–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shaver, G. R., Giblin, A. E., Nadelhoffer, K. J.et al. (2006) Carbon turnover in Alaskan tundra soils: effects of organic matter quality, temperature, moisture and fertilizer. Journal of Ecology, 94, 740–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjoberg, G., Nilsson, S. I., Persson, T. and Karlsson, P. (2004) Degradation of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin in decomposing spruce needle litter in relation to N. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 36, 1761–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, S. E. and Read, D. J. (1997) Mycorrhizal Symbiosis. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Smith, V. R. (2005) Moisture, carbon and inorganic nutrient controls of soil respiration at a sub-Antarctic island. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 37, 81–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subke, J. A. and Tenhunen, J. D. (2004) Direct measurements of CO2 flux below a spruce forest canopy. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 126, 157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Subke, J. A., Reichstein, M. and Tenhunen, J. (2003) Explaining temporal variation in soil CO2 efflux in a mature spruce forest in Southern Germany. Soil Biology and Biochemistry, 35, 1467–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Suzuki, S., Ishizuka, S., Kitamura, K., Yamanoi, K. and Nakai, Y. (2006) Continuous estimation of winter carbon dioxide efflux from the snow surface in a deciduous broadleaf forest. Journal of Geophysical Research – Atmospheres, 111, D17101, doi 10.1029/2005JDoo6595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, J. W., Baldocchi, D. D., Qi, Y. and Xu, L. K. (2003) Assessing soil CO2 efflux using continuous measurements of CO2 profiles in soils with small solid-state sensors. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 118, 207–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tedeschi, V., Rey, A., Manca, G.et al. (2006) Soil respiration in a Mediterranean oak forest at different developmental stages after coppicing. Global Change Biology, 12, 110–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, W. J., Zu, Y. G., Wang, H. M.et al. (2005) Effect of collar insertion on soil respiration in a larch forest measured with a LI-6400 soil CO2 flux system. Journal of Forest Research, 10, 57–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, K. B. and Meyers, T. P. (2001) The spatial variability of energy and carbon dioxide fluxes at the floor of a deciduous forest. Boundary-Layer Meteorology, 98, 443–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yim, M. H., Joo, S. J., Shutou, K. and Nakane, K. (2003) Spatial variability of soil respiration in a larch plantation: estimation of the number of sampling points required. Forest Ecology and Management, 175, 585–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×