Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-788cddb947-rnj55 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-10-10T19:50:56.852Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Secularizing King Lear: Shakespeare, Tate, and the Sacred

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2007

Peter Holland
Affiliation:
Shakespeare Institute, University of Birmingham
Get access

Summary

Drama and religion, having lived in holy matrimony for some five hundred years, are given a decree of divorce nisi at the Reformation, which, under the pressures of the Renaissance, is made absolute shortly after the Restoration.

(Glynne Wickham)

Nahum Tate's King Lear was first seen in the winter of 1680-1, and it was in his adaptation, or in further adaptations of it, that the play was always performed until Macready went back to a (heavily cut) Shakespearian text in 1838. For over 150 years, then - half its post-Restoration stage life - Lear appeared on the English stage without the Fool, with a happy ending, and usually with an added love story leading to the marriage of Edgar and Cordelia. Moreover, it was during the years when this travesty held sway that the play secured its leading place in the canon. It had been revived between 1660 and 1680, but not often. It was Tate's version that established itself as a stock play in the early eighteenth century; it was Tate's King Lear that Garrick took up in 1742 and made into his greatest role; by the time he retired in 1776 it was one of the acknowledged mountain peaks of the English repertoire, undertaken as such by Kemble in 1788 and Kean in 1820. Ironically, it was just this exalted reputation which eventually brought Tate's theatrical reign to an end: to literary Romantic playgoers such as Lamb and Keats, the adaptation now seemed a vulgar affront to the sublimity of the true play. Sentiment swung against the happy ending, Macready's experiment was accepted as a success, and for Victorian bardolatry Tate was already, as he has remained, a derisory footnote to the history of a masterpiece.

Type
Chapter
Information
Shakespeare Survey
An Annual Survey of Shakespeare Studies and Production
, pp. 96 - 105
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2002

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×