Book contents
- Shakespeare and Textual Studies
- Shakespeare and Textual Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Scripts and manuscripts
- Part II Making books; building reputations
- Part III From print to manuscript
- Part IV Editorial legacies
- Part V Editorial practices
- Part VI Apparatus and the fashioning of knowledge
- Works cited
- Index
- References
Works cited
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 November 2015
Book contents
- Shakespeare and Textual Studies
- Shakespeare and Textual Studies
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Contributors
- Book part
- Introduction
- Part I Scripts and manuscripts
- Part II Making books; building reputations
- Part III From print to manuscript
- Part IV Editorial legacies
- Part V Editorial practices
- Part VI Apparatus and the fashioning of knowledge
- Works cited
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Shakespeare and Textual Studies , pp. 415 - 451Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2015
References
Primary Sources
Actsophia 2009. Actsophia LLC. App.Google Scholar
Advertisement for ‘The Penny Shakespeare’. 1845. Publishers’ Circular 8:186 (16 June), advert number 670, p. 181.Google Scholar
Allentuck, Marcia 1976. ‘Sir Thomas Hanmer Instructs Francis Hayman: An Editor’s Notes to his Illustrator (1744)’, Shakespeare Quarterly 27: 288–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allott, Robert 1600. Englands Parnassus: or The Choysest Flowers of our Moderne Poets.Google Scholar
Andersen, Jennifer, and Sauer, Elizabeth (eds.) 2002. Books and Readers in Early Modern England: Material Studies. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Dorothy 1980. ‘Reflections on Librarianship: Observations Arising from Examination of the Garrick Collection of Old Plays in the British Library’, British Library Journal 6: 1–6.Google Scholar
1573. New custome.Google Scholar
1591. The troublesome raigne of Iohn King of England.Google Scholar
1592. Present remedies against the plague.Google Scholar
1594a. A pleasant conceited historie, called the taming of a shrew.Google Scholar
1594b. Present remedies against the plague.Google Scholar
1594c. The true tragedie of Richard the third.Google Scholar
1595. The lamentable tragedie of Locrine, the eldest sonne of King Brutus.Google Scholar
1596a. A pleasant conceited comedie, called, A knacke to know an honest man.Google Scholar
1596b. The raigne of King Edward the third.Google Scholar
1605a. Captain Thomas Stukeley.Google Scholar
1605b. The London prodigall.Google Scholar
1607. The Merrie Conceited Jests of George Peele Gentleman.Google Scholar
1609? Pimlyco. Or, Runne Red-Cap.Google Scholar
1619. Two Wise Men And All The Rest Fooles.Google Scholar
1648. Lord have Mercy upon us, or the Visitation at Oxford.Google Scholar
1659. Lady Alimony.Google Scholar
Appignanesi, Richard 2007. The Tempest, illustrated by Duffield, Paul. London: SelfMadeHero.Google Scholar
Aquinas, Thomas 1913. The ‘Summa Theologica’ of St. Thomas Aquinas. Trans. fathers of the English Dominican province. London: Burns Oates and Washbourne.Google Scholar
Arber, Edward 1875–94. A Transcript of the Registers of the Company of Stationers of London, 1554–1640 AD.Google Scholar
Ariosto, Lodovico 1591. Orlando furioso in English heroical verse, by Iohn Haringto[n].Google Scholar
Babington, Gervase 1588. A profitable exposition of the Lords prayer, by way of questions and answers.Google Scholar
Bald, R. C. 1938. Bibliographical Studies in the Beaumont & Fletcher Folio of 1647. London: Oxford University Press for the Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Baldwin, T. W. 1947. Shakespeare’s Five-Act Structure. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Banham, Rob 2007. ‘The Industrialization of the Book 1800–1900’, in Eliot, Simon and Rose, Jonathan (eds.) A Companion to the History of the Book. Oxford: Blackwell, 273–90.Google Scholar
Barroll, Leeds 1991. Politics, Plague and Shakespeare’s Theatre: The Stuart Years. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Barthes, Roland 1977. ‘The Death of the Author’, in Image, Music Text, trans. Heath, Stephen. New York: Hill & Wang, 142–8.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan 2000. ‘Pictorial Shakespeare: Text, Stage, Illustration’, in Golden, Catherine J. (ed.) Book Illustrated: Text, Image, and Culture, 1770–1930, New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press, 31–59.Google Scholar
Bate, Jonathan, and Rasmussen, Eric (eds.) 2007. William Shakespeare: Complete Works. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Bawcutt, N. W. (ed.) 1991. Measure for Measure. By Shakespeare, William. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bawcutt, N. W. 1993. ‘Ralph Crane’s Transcript of A Game at Chess, Bodleian Manuscript Malone 25’, Collections XV. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Beal, Peter 1980. Catalogue of English Literary Manuscripts. https://celm2.dighum.kcl.ac.uk (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Beckerman, Bernard 1980. ‘The Persons Personated: Character Lists in English Renaissance Play Texts’, Poetry and Drama in the English Renaissance: in Honour of Professor Jiro Ozu. Tokyo: Kinokuniya Company Ltd., 61–70.Google Scholar
Bednarz, James 2001. Shakespeare and the Poets’ War. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Benedetti, Jean 2001. David Garrick and the Birth of the Modern Theatre. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stuart 2004. Trade Bookbinding in the British Isles 1660–1800. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Gerald Eades 1941–68. The Jacobean and Caroline Stage. 7 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Bentley, Gerald Eades 1971. The Profession of Dramatist in Shakespeare’s Time, 1590–1642. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Berger, Thomas L. 2007. ‘Shakespeare Writ Small: Early Single Editions of Shakespeare’s Plays’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.) A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 57–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berger, Thomas L., and Massai, Sonia (eds.) 2014. The Paratexts in English Printed Drama to 1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bergeron, David M. 2002. ‘The King’s Men’s King’s Men: Shakespeare and Folio Patronage’, in White, Paul Whitfield and Westfall, Suzanne R. (eds.) Shakespeare and Theatrical Patronage in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 45–63.Google Scholar
Bertram, Paul 1981. White Spaces in Shakespeare: The Development of the Modern Text. Cleveland, Ohio: Bellflower Press.Google Scholar
Best, Michael 2009. ‘Standing in Rich Place: Electrifying the Multiple-Text Edition or, Every Text is Multiple’. College Literature 36.1: 26–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Best, Michael(ed.). n.d. Internet Shakespeare Editions. www.internetshakespeare.uvic.ca (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Bevington, David 2004. ‘Modern Spelling: The Hard Choices’, in Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, Margaret Jane (eds.) Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 143–57.Google Scholar
Black, M. W., and Shaaber, M. A. (eds.) 1937. Shakespeare’s Seventeenth-Century Editors, 1632–1685. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Blair, Ann 2010. Too Much to Know: Managing Scholarly Information before the Modern Age. Cambridge, Mass.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. 1991. The First Folio of Shakespeare. Washington, DC: Folger Library Publications.Google Scholar
Blayney, Peter W. M. 1997. ‘The Publication of Playbooks’, in Cox, John and Kastan, David Scott (eds.) A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 383–422.Google Scholar
Blostein, David A. (ed.) 1978. Parasitaster or The Fawn. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Blostein, James 1825. Memoirs of the Life of John Philip Kemble, Esq. 2 vols. London: Longman, Hurst, Rees, Orme, Brown and Green.Google Scholar
Boas, F. S. (ed.) 1968 [1929]. Elizabethan and other Essays. Freeport, NY: Books for Libraries Press.Google Scholar
Bolden Auction Galleries. n.d. Lot 505. www.ukauctioneers.com/lots/1238417 (accessed June 2013). No longer available.Google Scholar
Bondy, Louis W. 1981. Miniature Books: Their History from the Beginnings to the Present Day. London: Sheppard.Google Scholar
Booth, Stephen (ed.). 1977. Shakespeare’s Sonnets. New Haven, Conn: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Boswell, J., and Malone, E. (eds.) 1821. Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare. 21 vols. London: R. C. and J. Rivington.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1950–51. ‘Some Relations of Bibliography to Editorial Problems’, Studies in Bibliography 3: 37–62.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1955. On Editing Shakespeare and the Elizabethan Dramatists. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Library.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1962. Principles of Bibliographical Description. New York: Russell & Russell.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1974. ‘Beggars Bush: A Reconstructed Prompt-Book and its Copy’, Studies in Bibliography 27: 114–36.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1982. ‘Historical Collation in an Old-Spelling Shakespeare Edition: Another View’, Studies in Bibliography 35: 234–58.Google Scholar
Bowers, Fredson 1990. ‘The Problem of Semi-Substantive Variants: An Example from the Shakespeare–Fletcher Henry VIII’, Studies in Bibliography 43: 80–95.Google Scholar
Bradbrook, Muriel 1964. ‘St. George for Spelling Reform! Social Implications of Orthography – Cheke to Whythorn; Mulcaster to Shakespeare’s Holofernes’, Shakespeare Quarterly 15: 129–41.Google Scholar
Brayman Hackel, Heidi 2005. Reading Material in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Briggs, Julia 1998. ‘“The Lady Vanishes”: Problems of Authorship and Editing in the Middleton Canon’, in Hill, W. Speed (ed.) New Ways of Looking at Old Texts, II: Papers of the Renaissance English Text Society, 1992–1996. Tempe, Ariz.: Medieval & Renaissance Text & Studies in conjunction with Renaissance English Text Society, 109–20.Google Scholar
Briggs, Julia (ed.) 2007. The Lady’s Tragedy, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.) Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 833–906.Google Scholar
Bristow, Richard 1580. A reply to Fulke, In defense of M. D. Allens scroll of articles.Google Scholar
Brooks, Douglas 1998. From Playhouse to Printing House: Drama and Authorship in Early Modern England. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brown, Arthur (ed.) 1953. The Captives by Thomas Heywood. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell 1954. ‘The Printing of John Webster’s Plays (I)’, Studies in Bibliography 6: 117–40.Google Scholar
Brown, John Russell (ed.) 1964. The Duchess of Malfi. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas 2000. ‘The Structural Transformation of Print in Late Elizabethan England’, in Marotti, Arthur F. and Bristol, Michael D. (eds.) Print, Manuscript, & Performance: The Changing Relations of the Media in Early Modern England. Columbus: Ohio State University Press, 49–89.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas 2013a. ‘Shakespeare the Stationer,’ in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 112–31.Google Scholar
Bruster, Douglas 2013b. ‘Shakespearean Spellings and Handwriting in the Additional Passages Printed in the 1602 Spanish Tragedy’, Notes and Queries 60: 420–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sir Bunbury, Henry (ed.) 1838. The Correspondence of Sir Thomas Hanmer. London: Edward Moxon.Google Scholar
Burdick, Anne, Drucker, Johanna, Lunenfeld, Peter, et al. 2012. Digital_Humanities. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burgoyne, Frank J. 1904. Collotype Facsimile & Type Transcript of an Elizabethan Manuscript Preserved at Alnwick Castle, Northumberland. London: Longmans, Green, & Co.Google Scholar
Burnim, Kalman A., and Highfill, Philip H. Jr. 1998. John Bell Patron of British Theatrical Portraiture: A Catalog of the Theatrical Portraits in His Editions of Bell’s Shakespeare and Bell’s British Theatre. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Burton, Jonathan 2005. Traffic and Turning: Islam and English Drama, 1579–1624. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Butler, Martin (ed.) 2005. Cymbeline. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson [2012]. ‘Guidelines’. Unpublished.Google Scholar
Capell, Edward 1774. Notes and various readings to Shakespeare. London: Printed for Edw. and Cha. Dilly, in the Poultry.Google Scholar
Carr, Nicholas 2010. The Shallows: What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains. London: Atlantic.Google Scholar
Carson, Christie 2008. ‘eShakespeare and Performance’, Shakespeare 4.3: 270–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. W. 1939. Man’s Unconquerable Mind: Studies of English Writers, from Bede to A. E. Housman and W. R. Ker. London: Jonathan Cape.Google Scholar
Chartier, Roger, and Stallybrass, Peter 2013. ‘What is a Book?’, in Freistat, Neil and Flanders, Julia (eds.) The Cambridge Companion to Textual Scholarship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 188–204.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick 2008. Shakespeare’s Literary Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cheney, Patrick 2004. Shakespeare, National Poet–Playwright. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Child, Harold 1935. ‘The Shakespearean Productions of John Philip Kemble’, Papers of the Shakespeare Association 19: 6.Google Scholar
Chorney, Tatjana 2006. ‘Book History and Reader-Response Theory: Teaching Shakespeare’s Romeo and Juliet and King Lear’, in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 167–73.Google Scholar
Citron, Marcia J. 1993. Gender and the Musical Canon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Collier, J. P. (ed.) 1858. Shakespeare’s Comedies, Histories, Tragedies and Poems. 2nd edn. 6 vols. London: Whittaker.Google Scholar
Cook, Megan 2011. ‘The Poet and the Antiquaries: Renaissance Readers and Chaucerian Scholarship’. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Coombs, James H., Renear, Allen H., and DeRose, Steven J.. 1987. ‘Markup Systems and the Future of Scholarly Text Processing’. Communications of the Association for Computing Machinery 30.11: 933–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cormack, Bradin, and Mazzio, Carla 2005. Book Use, Book Theory, 1500–1700. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Craig, Hugh, and Kinney, Arthur 2009. Shakespeare, Computers, and the Mystery of Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crane, Mary Thomas 1997. Framing Authority: Sayings, Self, and Society in Sixteenth-Century England. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Craven, Alan E. 1965. ‘Justification of Prose and Jaggard Compositor B’, English Language Notes 3: 15–17.Google Scholar
Crystal, David, and Crystal, Ben 2004. Shakespeare’s Words: A Glossary & Language Companion. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
Cunningham, Vanessa 2008. Shakespeare and Garrick. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Cupper, William 1592. Certaine sermons concerning Gods late visitation in the citie of London.Google Scholar
Cutts, J. P. 1967. ‘New Findings with Regard to the 1624 Protection List’, Shakespeare Survey 19: 101–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dane, Joseph A. 2012. What is a Book? The Study of Early Printed Books. South Bend, Ind.: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Dane, Joseph A., and Gillespie, Alexandra 2010. ‘The Myth of the Cheap Quarto’, in King, John N. (ed.) Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 24–45.Google Scholar
Davies, Thomas 1780. Memoirs of the Life of David Garrick, Esq. vol. 1. Dublin: Joseph Hill.Google Scholar
Dawson, Giles E. 1946. ‘The Copyright of Shakespeare’s Dramatic Works’, in Prouty, Charles T. (ed.) The University of Missouri Studies in Honor of A. H. R. Fairchild. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 2, 11–35.Google Scholar
Day, John 1950. Law Tricks. Ed. Crow, John. Malone Society Reprints. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Day, John, Wilkins, George, and Rowley, William 1607. The Travels of Three English Brothers.Google Scholar
Daybell, James. 2012. The Material Letter in Early Modern England: Manuscript Letters and the Culture and Practices of Letter-Writing, 1512–1635. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta 1991a. ‘Shakespeare in Quotation Marks’, in Marsden, Jean I. (ed.) The Appropriation of Shakespeare: Post-Renaissance Reconstructions of the Works and the Myth. New York: St Martin’s, 57–71.Google Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta 1991b. Shakespeare Verbatim: The Reproduction of Authenticity and the 1790 Apparatus. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Grazia, Margreta, and Stallybrass, Peter 1993, ‘The Materiality of the Shakespearean Text’, Shakespeare Quarterly 44: 255–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lafontaine, Henry Cart (ed.) 1909. The king’s musick; a transcript of records relating to music and musicians, 1460–1700. London: Novello.Google Scholar
De Ricci, Seymour 1930. English Collectors of Books and Manuscripts, 1530–1930, and their Ownership. Sandars Lectures, 1929–30. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Deegan, Marilyn, and Sutherland, Kathryn. 2009. Transferred Illusions: Digital Technology and the Forms of Print. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
DEEP: Database of Early English Playbooks 2007. Eds. Farmer, Alan B. and Lesser, Zachary. deep.sas.upenn.edu (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Dent, R. W. 1981. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Language: An Index. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dent, R. W. 1984. Proverbial Language in English Drama Exclusive of Shakespeare, 1495–1616: An Index. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Derrida, Jacques 1987. The Post Card: From Socrates to Freud and Beyond. Trans. Bass, Alan. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dessen, Alan 1995. ‘Sick Chairs and Sick Thrones’, in Recovering Shakespeare’s Theatrical Vocabulary. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 109–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devonshire, William Cavendish (Duke of) n.d. Chatsworth Library: Kemble-Devonshire Collection of English Plays & Play-Bills. London: Sotheby, Wilkinson & Hodge.Google Scholar
Dimmock, Matthew 2015. ‘Shakespeare’s Non-Christian Religions’, in Loewenstein, David and Whitmore, Michael (eds.) Shakespeare and Early Modern Religion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, E. J. 1968. English Pronunciation, 1500–1700. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Dobson, M. 1992. The Making of the National Poet: Shakespeare, Adaptation and Authorship, 1660–1769. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Donaldson, George 2008. ‘The First Folio: “My Shakespeare”/ “Our Shakespeare”: Whose Shakespeare?’, in Meek, Richard, Rickard, Jane, and Wilson, Richard (eds.) Shakespeare’s Book: Essays in Reading, Writing and Reception. Manchester: Manchester University Press, 187–206.Google Scholar
Donatus, Aelius. n.d. ‘Aeli Donati Quod Fertur Commentum Terenti’. Hyperdonat/Hyperdonatus. http://hyperdonat.tge-adonis.fr/editions/index.html (accessed 4 October 2013).Google Scholar
Donker, Marjorie 1992. Shakespeare’s Proverbial Themes: A Rhetorical Context for the Sententia as Res. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
Donnellan, Declan 2002. The Actor and the Target. [New York]: Theatre Communications Group.Google Scholar
Donno, E. S. (ed.) 1985. Twelfth Night. The New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dryden, John, and Davenant, William 1676. The Tempest, or the Enchanted Island. A Comedy.Google Scholar
Duncan-Jones, Katherine, and Woudhuysen, H. R. (eds.) 2007. Shakespeare‘s Poems. Arden. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Early English Books Online (EEBO). Chadwyick Healy. http://eebo.chadwyck.com (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Egan, Gabriel 2010. The Struggle for Shakespeare’s Text: Twentieth-Century Editorial Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egan, Gabriel 2011. ‘Precision, Consistency and Completeness in Early-Modern Playbook Manuscripts: The Evidence from Thomas of Woodstock and John a Kent and John a Cumber’, The Library 7th ser. 12.4: 376–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eisenstein, Elizabeth L. 1980 [1979]. The Printing Press as an Agent of Change: Communication and Cultural Transformations in Early Modern Europe. 2 vols.; repr as single vol. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eliot, Simon 1994. Some Patterns and Trends in British Publishing 1800–1919. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
English Short Title Catalogue (ESTC). British Library. http://estc.bl.uk.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas 2003. Shakespeare as Literary Dramatist. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Erne, Lukas 2013. Shakespeare and the Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erne, Lukas, and Kidnie, Margaret Jane 2004. ‘Introduction’, Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–20.Google Scholar
Estill, Laura 2015. Dramatic Extracts in Seventeenth-Century English Manuscripts: Watching, Reading, Changing Plays. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore (ed.) 1960–96. Shakespearean Prompt-books of the Seventeenth Century. vol. 1 pts. 1–2 (1960); vol. 2, pts. 1–2 (1963); vol. 3, pts. 1–2 (1964); vol. 4 (1966); vol. 5 (1970); vol. 6 (1980); vol. 7 (1989); vol. 8 (1996) Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia and Bibliographical Society of the University of Virginia. Online edition. http://bsuva.org/bsuva/promptbook/ (accessed 29 April 2012).Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore 1962. ‘The Douai Manuscript: Six Shakespearean Transcripts (1694–95)’, Philological Quarterly 41.1: 158–72.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore(ed.) 1974b. ‘Shakespeare’s Text’, in The Riverside Shakespeare. Boston: Houghton Mifflin, 27–41.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore 1987. ‘The Merry Wives of Windsor: The Folger Manuscript’, in Fabian, Bernhard and Tetzeli von Rosador, Kurt (eds.) Shakespeare: Text, Language, Criticism: Essays in Honour of Martin Spevack. Zurich and New York: Olms-Weidman, 57–79.Google Scholar
Evans, G. Blakemore, and Williams, George Walton (eds.) 1974. The History of King Henry IV, as revised by Sir Edward Dering, Bart. Charlottesville: Published for the Folger Shakespeare Library by the University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B. n.d. ‘Playbooks and the Question of Ephemerality’. Unpublished typescript.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2000. ‘Vile Arts: The Marketing of English Printed Drama, 1512–1660’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 39: 77–165.Google Scholar
Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2005. ‘The Popularity of Playbooks Revisited’, Shakespeare Quarterly 56: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farmer, Alan B., and Lesser, Zachary 2006. ‘Canons and Classics: Publishing Drama in Caroline England’, in Zucker, Adam and Farmer, Alan B. (eds.) Localizing Caroline Drama: Politics and Economics of the Early Modern English Stage, 1625–1642. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 17–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fehrenbach, Robert and Leedham-Green, Elisabeth 1992. Private Libraries in Renaissance England. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar
Feuillerat, A. 1953. The Composition of Shakespeare’s Plays: Authorship, Chronology. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fitzgeffrey, Henry 1617. Satyres and Satyricall Epigrams: The Third Booke of Humours: Intituled Notes from Black-Fryers.Google Scholar
Fleming, Juliet 2011. ‘Changed Opinion as to Flowers’, in Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.) Renaissance Paratexts, 48–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Mirjam 2006. Bookbinders at Work: Their Roles and Methods. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll.Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel 1979. ‘What Is an Author?’, in Harari, Josué V. (ed.) Textual Strategies: Perspectives in Post-Structuralist Criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 141–60.Google Scholar
Foulface, Philip of Ale-foord, student in good felloship (pseud. ) 1593. Baccus bountie, describing the debonaire dietie of his bountifull godhead.Google Scholar
Freeman, Arthur, and Freeman, Janet Ing 2001. ‘Did Halliwell Steal and Mutilate the First Quarto of Hamlet?’, The Library 7th ser. 2: 349–63.Google Scholar
Freeman, Arthur, and Freeman, Janet Ing 2004. John Payne Collier: Scholarship and Forgery in the Nineteenth Century. 2 vols. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Frye, Northrop (ed.) 1970 [1959]. The Tempest. The Pelican Shakespeare. Baltimore, Md.: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
Fuller, Steve 2013. ‘Deviant Interdisciplinarity as Philosophical Practice: Prologomena to Deep Intellectual History’. Synthese 190: 1899–916.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fulwell, Ulpian 1991. ‘Like Will to Like’, in Happé, Peter (ed.) Two Moral Interludes. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1871. A New Variorum Edition of Romeo and Juliet. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1890. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare. 8 vols. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott & Co.Google Scholar
Furness, H. H. (ed.) 1892. A New Variorum Edition of Shakespeare, The Tempest. Philadelphia: J. B. Lippincott.Google Scholar
Gabrieli, Vittorio, and Melchiori, Giorgio (eds.) 1990. Sir Thomas More. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Galbraith, Steven K. 2010. ‘English Literary Folios 1593–1623: Studying Shifts in Format’, in King, John N. (ed.) Tudor Books and Readers: Materiality and the Construction of Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 46–67.Google Scholar
Galey, Alan. n.d. Visualizing Variation. http://individual.utoronto.ca/alangaley/visualizingvariation/.Google Scholar
Galey, Alan. 2012. ‘Seeing the Spider: Visualizations of Textual Variation in Shakespearean Editing’. Unpublished paper presented at the Shakespeare Association of American meeting in Boston.Google Scholar
Galey, Alan. 2014. The Shakespearean Archive: Experiments in New Media from the Renaissance to Postmodernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnier, Robert 1595. The tragedie of Antonie. Doone into English by the Countesse of Pembroke.Google Scholar
Gaskell, Philip 1995 [1972]. A New Introduction to Bibliography. New Castle, Del.: Oak Knoll.Google Scholar
Genette, Gerard 1997. Paratexts: Thresholds of Interpretation. Trans. Lewin, Jane E.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerritsen, J. (ed.) 1952. The Honest Mans Fortune: A Critical Edition of MS Dyce 9 (1625). Groningen: Wolters.Google Scholar
Gervinus, G. G. 1883 [1862]. Shakespeare Commentaries. Trans. Bunnett, F. E.. London: Smith, Elder & Co.Google Scholar
Gibbons, Brian 1999. ‘The New Cambridge Shakespeare: The Early Quartos’, in Irace, Kathleen (ed.) The First Quarto of Hamlet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Giddens, Eugene 2011. How to Read a Shakespearean Play Text. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gieskes, Edward 2006. Representing the Professions: Administration, Law, and Theater in Early Modern England. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Gillespie, Alexandra 2004. ‘Poets, Printers, and Early English Sammelbände’, Huntington Library Quarterly 67.2: 189–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberg, Jonathan 1991. Writing Matter: From the Hands of the English Renaissance. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Gondris, J. (ed.) 1998. Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickenson University Press.Google Scholar
Gossett, Suzanne (ed.) 2004. ‘Introduction’, Pericles. Arden 3. London: Thomson Learning, 1–163.Google Scholar
Gossett, Suzanne 2005. ‘Emendations, Reconstructions, and the Uses of the Past’, Text 17: 35–54.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony 1997. ‘Is the History of Reading a Marginal Enterprise? Guillaume Budé and his Books’, Papers of the Bibliographic Society of America 91:2: 139–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grafton, Anthony 1999. The Footnote: A Curious History. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony 2011. The Culture of Correction in Renaissance Europe. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Grafton, Anthony, and Jardine, Lisa 1990. ‘Studied for Action: How Gabriel Harvey Read His Livy’, Past and Present 129:1: 30–78.Google Scholar
Graham-White, Anthony 1994. Punctuation and its Dramatic Value in Shakespearean Drama. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Graves, Thornton S. 1924. ‘Ralph Crane and the King’s Players’, Studies in Philology 21: 362–6.Google Scholar
Greenblatt, Stephen 2004. Will in the World: How Shakespeare Became Shakespeare. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert n.d. The honorable historie of frier Bacon, and frier Bongay.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert n.d. Pandosto the triumph of time.Google Scholar
Greene, Robert 1592b. Greenes, groats-worth of witte, bought with a million of repentance [ed. Chettle, Henry].Google Scholar
Greene, Robert 1994. Greene’s Groatsworth of Wit. Ed. Carroll, D. Allen. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts & Studies.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1908. ‘On Certain False Dates in Shakespearian Quartos’, The Library 9: 113–31.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1909. The Second Maiden’s Tragedy 1611. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1910. Shakespeare’s Merry Wives of Windsor 1602. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. (ed.) 1911. The Book of Sir Thomas More. Malone Society Reprints. Oxford: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1931. Dramatic Documents from the Elizabethan Playhouses: Stage Plots, Actors’ Parts, Prompt Books. 2 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1942. ‘Some Notes on Crane’s Manuscript of The Witch’, The Library. 4th ser. 22: 208–22.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1954 [1942]. The Editorial Problem in Shakespeare: A Survey of the Foundations of the Text. 3rd edn. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W. 1955. The Shakespeare First Folio: Its Bibliographical and Textual History. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W., and Boswell, E. 1930. Records of the Court of the Stationers’ Company, 1576 to 1602: From Register B. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Greg, W. W., and Wilson, F. P. (eds.) 1950. The Witch, by Thomas Middleton. Malone Society Reprints. Oxford: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Guillory, John 2010. ‘Genesis of the Media Concept’. Critical Inquiry 36.2: 321–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurr, Andrew 2004a. Playgoing in Shakespeare’s London. 3rd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew 2004b. The Shakespeare Company 1594–1642. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gurr, Andrew (ed.) 2005. King Henry V. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hailey, R. Carter 2007. ‘The Dating Game: New Evidence for the Dates of Q4 Romeo and Juliet and Q4 Hamlet’, Shakespeare Quarterly 58: 367–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halasz, Alexandra 2013. ‘The Stationers’ Shakespeare’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 17–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hallett, Charles A. and Hallett, Elaine S. 1991. Analyzing Shakespeare’s Action: Scene versus Sequence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halpern, Richard 1991. The Poetics of Primitive Accumulation: English Renaissance Culture and the Genealogy of Capital. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hammond, Paul 2009. The Strangeness of Tragedy. Oxford. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hampden, J. (ed.) 1926. The Tempest. Teaching of English Series. London: T. Nelson and Sons.Google Scholar
Hanna, Ralph 1996. Pursuing History: Middle English Manuscripts and their Texts. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hardinge, George 1801. Another Essence of Malone, Or, The ‘Beauties’ of Shakespeare’s Editor. London: T. Becket.Google Scholar
Harrison, Peter 2007. ‘Philosophy and the Crisis of Religion’, in Hankins, James (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Renaissance Philosophy, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 234–49.Google Scholar
Hattaway, Michael 2009. ‘Dating As You Like It and the Problems of “As the Dial Hand Tells O’er”’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60: 154–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Anne (ed.) 2006 Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto.Google Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine 2005. My Mother was a Computer: Digital Subjects and Literary Texts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayles, N. Katherine 2012. How We Think: Digital Media and Contemporary Technogenesis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayley, Emma 2010. ‘Manga Shakespeare’, in Johnson-Woods, Toni (ed.) Manga: An Anthology of Global and Cultural Perspectives. New York and London: Continuum, 267–80.Google Scholar
Hedbäck, Ann-Mari 1979. ‘The Douai Manuscript Reexamined’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 73: 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helgerson, Richard 1983. Self-Crowned Laureates: Spenser, Jonson, Milton and the Literary System. Palo Alto, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Helgerson, Richard 1992. Forms of Nationhood: The Elizabethan Writing of England. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Hentzner, Paul 1757. A Journey into England in the year M.D.XC.VIII. Trans. Walpole, Horace.Google Scholar
Herford, C. H., Simpson, Evelyn, and Simpson, Percy (eds.) 1925–52. Ben Jonson. 11 vols. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Highfill, Philip A., Burnim, Kalman A., and Langhans, Edward A. (eds.) 1973–93. A Biographical Dictionary of Actors, Actresses, Musicians, Dancers, Managers & other Stage Personnel in London, 1660–1800. 16 vols. Carbondale, Ill.: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton 1963. The Printing and Proof-Reading of the First Folio of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton (ed.) 1968. The Norton Facsimile: The First Folio of Shakespeare. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Hinman, Charlton, and Blayney, Peter W. M. (eds.) 1996. The First Folio of Shakespeare: The Norton Facsimile. Based on Folios in the Folger Shakespeare Library. 2nd edn. New York and London: W.W. Norton & Company.Google Scholar
Hirsch, Brett (ed.) n.d. Digital Renaissance Editions. http://digitalrenaissance.uvic.ca (accesed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Hirsch, Brett 2011. ‘The Kingdom Has Been Digitized: Electronic Editions of Renaissance Drama and the Long Shadows of Shakespeare and Print’, Literature Compass 8.9: 568–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschfeld, Heather Anne 2004. Joint Enterprises: Collaborative Drama and the Institutionalization of the English Renaissance Theater. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh, James E. 1981. The Structure of Shakespearean Scenes. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Hirsh, James E. 2002. ‘Act Divisions in the Shakespeare First Folio’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 96: 219–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodgdon, Barbara (ed.) 1997. The First Part of King Henry the Fourth. Boston, Mass.: Bedford.Google Scholar
Hodnett, Edward 1982. Image and Text: Studies in the Illustration of English Literature. London: Scolar Press.Google Scholar
Hoenselaars, Ton (ed.) 2012. ‘Shakespeare: Colleagues, Collaborators, Co-authors’, The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Contemporary Dramatists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 97–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holderness, Graham 2003. Textual Shakespeare: Writing and the Word. Hatfield: University of Hertfordshire Press.Google Scholar
Holderness, Graham, and Banks, Carol 1995. ‘Mimesis: Text and Reproduction’, Critical Survey 7: 332–8.Google Scholar
Holland, Peter 2001. ‘Beginning in the Middle’, Proceedings of the British Academy: Lectures and Memoirs. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–55.Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. 1996. The Texts of ‘Othello’ and Shakespearian Revision. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Honigmann, E. A. J. 2004. ‘The New Bibliography and its Critics’, in Erne, Lukas and Kidnie, Margaret Jane (eds.) Textual Performances: The Modern Reproduction of Shakespeare’s Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–93.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2008. ‘Booksellers’ Catalogues and the Classification of Printed Drama’, Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 102:4: 445–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2011. ‘Shakespeare at the White Greyhound’, Shakespeare Survey 64, 260–75.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2012, ‘Book Trade’, in Kinney, Arthur F. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 126–42.Google Scholar
Hooks, Adam 2013. ‘Wise Ventures: Shakespeare and Thomas Playfere at the Sign of the Angel,’ in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 47–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 1966. ‘Knight, Crane and the Copy for the Folio Winter’s Tale’, Notes and Queries 211: 139–40.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 1974. Ralph Crane and Some Shakespeare First Folio Comedies. Charlottesville: University Press of Virginia.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. (ed.) 1979. Sir John Van Olden Barnavelt by John Fletcher and Philip Massinger. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 1991. ‘Shakespeare’s Earliest Editor, Ralph Crane’, Shakespeare Survey 44: 113–30.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 1995. Middleton’s ‘Vulgar Pasquin’: Essays on A Game at Chess. Newark: University of Delaware Press.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 2002. ‘Ralph Crane: The Life and Works of a Jacobean Scribe in the Next Millennium’, Shakespearean International Yearbook 2: 150–7.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 2004. ‘Ralph Crane (fl. 1589–1632)’ (q.v.) Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Online edition. www.oxforddnb.com/view/article/6605.Google Scholar
Howard-Hill, T. H. 2006. ‘Early Modern Printers and the Standardization of English Spelling’, Modern Language Review 101: 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1956. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 8:129–46.Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1957. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 9:143–62 (II).Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1958. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 11:85–106 (III).Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1959. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 12:91–116 (IV).Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1960. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 13:77–108 (V).Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1961. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 14:45–67 (VI).Google Scholar
Hoy, Cyrus 1962. ‘The Shares of Fletcher and his Collaborators in the Beaumont and Fletcher Canon’, Studies in Bibliography 15: 71–90 (VII).Google Scholar
Hulme, P., and Sherman, W. H. (eds.) 2000. The Tempest and its Travels. London: Reaktion Books.Google Scholar
Hunt, Maurice 1999. ‘New Variorum Shakespeares in the Twenty-First Century’. Yearbook of English Studies 29: 57–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, G. K. 1951. ‘The Marking of Sententiae in Elizabethan Printed Plays, Poems and Romances’, The Library 6: 171–88.Google Scholar
Hunter, G. K. 2003. ‘The Social Function of Annotation’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon (eds.) In Arden: Editing Shakespeare. Essays in Honour of Richard Proudfoot. Arden Shakespeare. London: Thomson Learning, 177–93.Google Scholar
‘Iambic Pentameter’ (q.v.) Wikipedia. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iambic_pentameter (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Grace 2006. Dramatists and their Manuscripts in the Age of Shakespeare, Jonson, Middleton and Heywood: Authorship, Authority and the Playhouse. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Ioppolo, Grace (ed.) 2012. The Honest Man’s Fortune. Malone Society Reprints. London: Malone Society.Google Scholar
Iser, Wolfgang 1978. The Implied Reader: Patterns of Communication in Prose Fiction from Bunyan to Beckett. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. 1975. ‘Punctuation and the Compositors of Shakespeare’s Sonnets, 1609’, The Library 5th ser. 30: 2–23.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. 1979. Studies in Attribution: Middleton and Shakespeare. Salzburg: Institut für Anglistik und Amerikanistik.Google Scholar
Jackson, MacDonald P. 1990. ‘The Additions to “The Second Maiden’s Tragedy”: Shakespeare or Middleton?’, Shakespeare Quarterly 41: 402–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jarvis, Simon 1995. Scholars and Gentlemen: Shakespearian Textual Criticism and Representations of Scholarly Labour, 1725–1765. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayne, Sears 1956. Library Catalogues of the English Renaissance. Berkeley: University of California Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jeffries, Neil 2012. ‘Representing Knowledge – Metadata, Data and Linked Data’. The Signpost. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2012-07-02/Op-ed (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Jensen, M. P. 2011. ‘Shakespeare and the Comic Book’, in Burnett, Mark, Streete, Adrian, and Wray, Ramona (eds.) The Edinburgh Companion to Shakespeare and the Arts. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press, 388–405.Google Scholar
Johns, Adrian 1998. The Nature of the Book: Print and Knowledge in the Making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Gerald D. 1992. ‘Thomas Pavier, the Publisher, 1600–25’, The Library 6th ser. 14: 12–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, Nora 2003. The Actor as Playwright in Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel 1790. ‘Life of Rowe’, The Works of the English poets. With Prefaces, Biographical and Critical, 3 vols. London: Printed by John Nichols, 88–99.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel 1916. Johnson on Shakespeare. Ed. Raleigh, Walter. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel 1923 [1756]. Johnson’s Proposal for his Edition of Shakespeare, 1756. Printed in Typefacsimile. Oxford and London: Oxford University Press and Humphrey Milford.Google Scholar
Johnson, Samuel 1968. ‘Preface to Shakespeare 1765’, in Sherbo, Arthur (ed.) Johnson on Shakespeare. The Yale Edition of the Works of Johnson, Samuel. 7 vols. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press, 7. 59–113.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben 1631. ‘The iust indignation the Authour tooke at the vulgar censure of his Play, by some malicious spectators, begat this following Ode to himselfe’, in The Nevv Inne. Or, The Light Heart. H1v–H2v.Google Scholar
Jonson, Ben 2012. The Cambridge Edition of the Works of Ben Jonson. Eds. Bevington, David, Butler, Martin, and Donaldson, Ian. 7 vols. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jowett, John 1983. ‘New Created Creatures: Ralph Crane and the Stage Directions in The Tempest’, Shakespeare Survey 36: 107–20.Google Scholar
Jowett, John 2006. ‘Editing Shakespeare in the Twentieth Century’, Shakespeare Survey 59: 1–19.Google Scholar
Jowett, John 2007b. ‘Women, Beware Women’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.) Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1140–8.Google Scholar
Jowett, John 2013. ‘Private Iteration and Public Life: The Dering Manuscript of Henry IV’. Unpublished paper presented at the European Shakespeare Research Association congress (ESRA), Montpellier, France.Google Scholar
Kahrl, George M., and Anderson, Dorothy 1982. The Garrick Collection of Old English Plays: A Catalogue with an Historical Introduction. London: British Library.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott (ed.) 1999. ‘Shakespeare and the “Element” He Lived In’, in A Companion to Shakespeare. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 3–8.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott 2001. Shakespeare and the Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kastan, David Scott 2002a. ‘The Great Variety of Readers’, Critical Survey 14:1: 111–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kastan, David Scott (ed.) 2002b. King Henry IV, Part One. Arden. London: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Kelemen, Erick. 2006. ‘“Not to pick bad from bad, but by bad mend”: What Undergraduates Learn from Bad Editions,’ in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 161–6.Google Scholar
Kemble, J. P. 1817 Macbeth and King Richard the Third: An Essay, in answer to Remarks on some of the Characters of Shakespeare.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane 2009. Shakespeare and the Problem of Adaptation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kidnie, Margaret Jane (ed.) forthcoming. A Woman Killed with Kindness. By Heywood, Thomas. Arden Early Modern Drama. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
Kirsch, Arthur C. 1969. ‘A Caroline Commentary on the Drama’, Modern Philology 66: 256–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2006. ‘How Things Work: Teaching the Technologies of Literature,’ in Hawkins, Anne (ed.) Teaching Bibliography, Textual Criticism and Book History. London: Pickering & Chatto, 155–60.Google Scholar
Kirschenbaum, Matthew G. 2008. Mechanisms: New Media and the Forensic Imagination. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Kittler, Friedrich A. 2006. Gramophone, Film, Typewriter. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Kliman, Bernice W. 1997. ‘Samuel Johnson and Tonson’s 1745 Shakespeare: Warburton, Anonymity, and the Shakespeare Wars’, in Gondris, J. (ed.) Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickenson University Press, 299–317.Google Scholar
Knight, Charles 1864. Passages of a Working Life During Half a Century: With a Prelude of Early Reminiscences. London: Bradbury and Evans.Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2009. ‘Making Shakespeare’s Books: Assembly and Intertextuality in the Archives’, Shakespeare Quarterly 60: 304–40.Google Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2010. ‘Invisible Ink: A Note on Ghost Images in Early Printed Books’, Textual Cultures 5.2: 53–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, Jeffrey Todd 2013. Bound to Read: Compilations, Collections, and the Making of Renaissance Literature. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knolles, Richard 1606. The Six Bookes of a Commonweale written by I. Bodin … out of the French and Latine Copies, done into English.Google Scholar
Knowles, Richard 2003. Shakespeare Variorum Handbook: A Manual of Editorial Practice. 2nd edn. New York: Modern Language Association. www.mla.org/variorum_handbook/.Google Scholar
Knutson, Roslyn Lander 2001. Playing Companies and Commerce in Shakespeare’s Time. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Konkola, Kari 2000. ‘“People of the Book”: The Production of Theological Texts in Early Modern England,’ Papers of the Bibliographical Society of America 94: 5–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kristeva, Julia 1980. ‘Word, Dialogue, and Novel’, Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, New York: Columbia University Press, 64–91.Google Scholar
Krivatsy, Nati H., and Yeandle, Laetitia 1992. ‘Sir Edward Dering’, in Fehrenbach, R. J. and Leedham-Green, E. S. (eds.) Private Libraries in Renaissance England: A Collection and Catalogue of Tudor and Early Stuart Book-Lists. 7 vols. Binghamton, NY: Medieval and Renaissance Texts and Studies, vol. 1, 137–269.Google Scholar
Lackington, James 1794. Memoirs of the Forty-Five First Years in the Life of James Lackington.Google Scholar
Lake, David J. 1975. The Canon of Thomas Middleton’s Plays: Internal Evidence for the Major Problems of Authorship. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lancashire, Anne (ed.) 1978. The Second Maiden’s Tragedy. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Langhans, Edward A. 1981. Restoration Promptbooks. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press.Google Scholar
Leech, Clifford 1970. ‘On Editing One’s First Play’, Studies in Bibliography 23: 61–70.Google Scholar
Leedham-Green, Elisabeth 1986. Books in Cambridge Inventories: Book-Lists from Vice-Chancellor’s Court Probate Inventories in the Tudor and Stuart Periods. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lehmann, Hans-Thies. 2006. Postdramatic Theatre. Trans. Jürs-Munby, Karen. London and New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lennam, T. N. 1995. ‘Sir Edward Dering’s Collection of Playbooks, 1619–1624’, Shakespeare Quarterly 16: 145–53.Google Scholar
Lerer, Seth 2003. ‘Medieval English Literature and the Idea of the Anthology’, Publications of the Modern Language Association 118: 1251–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lesser, Zachary 2004. Renaissance Drama and the Politics of Dramatic Publication: Readings in the English Book Trade. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lesser, Zachary, and Stallybrass, Peter 2008. ‘The First Literary Hamlet and the Commonplacing of Professional Plays’, Shakespeare Quarterly 59: 371–420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levenson, Jill L. (ed.) 2000. Romeo and Juliet. The Oxford Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Levine, Nina 2007. ‘Citizens’ Games: Differentiating Collaboration and Sir Thomas More’, Shakespeare Quarterly 58: 31–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liebman, Dave. n.d. ‘Summary of the Transcription Process’. www.daveliebman.com/Feature_Articles/.Google Scholar
Little, David M., and Kahrl, George M. 1963. The Letters of David Garrick. 3 vols. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Lloyd, Megan 2002. ‘“To Speak Welsh”: Nonsense and Subversion in Shakespeare’s Henry IV, Part 1’, North American Journal of Welsh Studies 2:2: 7–14.Google Scholar
Lodge, Thomas 1593. Phillis: honoured with Pastorall sonnets, elegies, and amorous delights.Google Scholar
Loewenstein, Joseph 2002. Ben Jonson and Possessive Authorship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Logan, Robert 2007. Shakespeare’s Marlowe: The Influence of Christopher Marlowe on Shakespeare’s Artistry. Aldershot: Ashgate.Google Scholar
London Chronicle, 31 August–2 September 1769. ‘Some Strictures relative to Mr. Shakespeare and Mr. Garrick’, 221–2.Google Scholar
Long, William B. 1989. ‘John a Kent and John a Cumber: An Elizabethan Playbook and its Implications,’ in Elton, W. R. and Long, William B. (eds.) Shakespeare and Dramatic Tradition: Essays in Honor of S. F. Johnson, Newark: University of Delaware Press, 125–43.Google Scholar
Long, William B. 1999. ‘“Precious Few”: English Manuscript Playbooks,’ in Kastan, David Scott (ed.) A Companion to Shakespeare, Oxford: Blackwell, 414–33.Google Scholar
Loomis, Catherine 2002. William Shakespeare: A Documentary Volume, Dictionary of Literary Biography, vol. 263, Detroit, Mich.: Thomson Gale.Google Scholar
Love, Harold 2002. Attributing Authorship: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luminary Shakespeare iPad App. https://luminarydigitalmedia.com (accessed 10 June 2013).Google Scholar
Lupton, Thomas 1904. ‘All for Money’. Ed. Vogel, Ernst. Shakespeare Jahrbuch 40: 129–86.Google Scholar
Lyons, Tara 2011. ‘Pressing Issues: English Printed Drama in Collection before Jonson and Shakespeare’. Dissertation, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Lyons, Tara 2013. ‘Serials, Spinoffs, and Histories: Making “Shakespeare” in Collection before the Folio’. Philological Quarterly 91.2: 185–220.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome 1991. The Textual Condition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McGann, Jerome 2001a. Radiant Textuality: Literature after the World Wide Web. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome 2001b. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’. New Literary History 32.2: 283–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome 2002. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’. Literary and Linguistic Computing 17.1: 61–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McGann, Jerome 2004. ‘Visible and Invisible Books: Hermetic Images in N-Dimensional Space’, in Stoicheff, Peter and Taylor, Andrew (eds.), The Future of the Page. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 143–58.Google Scholar
McKenzie, D. F. 1959. ‘Shakespearian Punctuation – A New Beginning’, Review of English Studies 10: 361–70.Google Scholar
MacKenzie, Norman H. (ed.). 1991. The Later Poetic Manuscripts of Gerard Manley Hopkins. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
McLeod, Randall 1981. ‘Unemending Shakespeare’s Sonnet 111’, Studies in English Literature 21: 75–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLunan, Marshall 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: Signet Books.Google Scholar
McManaway, James C. 1967. ‘Excerpta Quaedam per A.W. Adolescentem’, in Harrison, Thomas P., Hill, Archibald A., Mossner, Ernest C., and Sledd, James (eds.) Studies in Honor of DeWitt T. Starnes. Austin: University of Texas Press, 117–29.Google Scholar
McMillin, Scott 1987. The Elizabethan Theatre and The Book of Sir Thomas More. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McNamara, Jeremy n.d. ‘“Ovidius Naso Was the Man”: Shakespeare’s Debt to Ovid’. http://department.monm.edu/history/faculty_forum/ovid.htm (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Maguire, Laurie E. 1996. Shakespearean Suspect Texts: the “Bad” Quartos and their Contexts. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, Laurie E. (forthcoming). ‘Textual Embodiment: The Case of Etcetera’, in Traub, Valerie (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Embodiment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Malone, Edmond (ed.) 1790. The Plays and Poems of William Shakespeare. 10 vols. London: J. Rivington and Sons.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. 1996. Unediting the Renaissance: Shakespeare, Marlowe and Milton. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. 1988. Puzzling Shakespeare: Local Reading and its Discontents. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Marcus, Leah S. 2007. ‘Editing Shakespeare in a Postmodern Age’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.) A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell, 128–44.Google Scholar
Marino, James J. 2011. Owning William Shakespeare: The King’s Men and their Intellectual Property. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher 1968. Dido Queen of Carthage and The Massacre at Paris. Ed. Oliver, H. J.. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Christopher 1978. The Jew of Malta. Ed. Bawcutt, N. W.. The Revels Plays. Manchester: Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F. 1993. Manuscript, Print and the English Renaissance Lyric. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Marotti, Arthur F., and Estill, Laura 2012. ‘Manuscript Circulation’, in F. Kinney, Arthur (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 53–70.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2007. Shakespeare and the Rise of the Editor. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2011. ‘Editorial Pledges in Early Modern Dramatic Paratexts’, in Smith, Helen and Wilson, Louise (eds.), Renaissance Paratexts, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 91–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2012. ‘Early Readers’, in Kinney, Arthur F. (ed.) The Oxford Handbook of Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 143–61.Google Scholar
Massai, Sonia 2013. ‘Edward Blount, the Herberts, and the First Folio’, in Straznicky, Marta (ed.) Shakespeare’s Stationers: Studies in Cultural Bibliography. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press: 132–46.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey 1997a. ‘Playwriting: Collaboration and Authorship’, A New History of Early English Drama. New York: Columbia University Press, 357–82.Google Scholar
Masten, Jeffrey 1997b. Textual Intercourse: Collaboration, Authorship, and Sexuality in Renaissance Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Maxwell, J. C. (ed.) 1960. Cymbeline. The New Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
May, Steven W., and Wolfe, Heather 2010. ‘Manuscripts in Tudor England’, in Cartwright, Kent (ed.) A Companion to Tudor Literature. Malden, Mass. and Oxford: Blackwell, 125–39.Google Scholar
Melchiori, Giorgio 1985. ‘Hand D in “Sir Thomas More”: An Essay in Misinterpretation’, Shakespeare Survey 38: 101–14.Google Scholar
Melchiori, Giorgio 1989. ‘The Book of Sir Thomas More: Dramatic Unity’, in Howard-Hill, T. H. (ed.) Shakespeare and Sir Thomas More: Essays on the Play and its Shakespearian Interest. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 77–100.Google Scholar
Merchant, William Moelwyn 1959. Shakespeare and the Artist. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas 2007a. More Dissemblers Besides Women. Ed. Jowett, John. In Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (Gen. Eds.) Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Middleton, Thomas 2007b. Thomas Middleton: The Collected Works. Eds. Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Minami, R. 2010. ‘Shakespeare for Japanese Popular Culture: Shojo Manga, Takarazuka, and Twelfth Night’, in Kennedy, Dennis and Li Lan, Yong (eds.) Shakespeare in Asia: Contemporary Performance, 109–31.Google Scholar
Mitchell, W. J. T. 1994. Picture Theory: Essays on Verbal and Visual Representation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moore, J. K. 1992. Primary Materials Relating to Copy and Print in English Books of the Sixteenth and Seventeenth Centuries. Oxford Bibliographical Society Occasional Publications 24. Oxford: Bodleian Library.Google Scholar
Morash, Christopher 2002. A History of Irish Theatre 1601–2000. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Moretti, Franco 2011. ‘Networks, Plots’, New Left Review, 2nd ser. 68 (March–April): 80–102.Google Scholar
Morris, D. (ed.) 1875. The Tempest. Collins School and College Classics. Glasgow: William Collins, Sons, and Co.Google Scholar
Moulton, Ian Frederick 2000. Before Pornography: Erotic Writing in Early Modern England. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mowat, Barbara A. 2000. ‘“Knowing I loved my books”: Reading The Tempest Intertextually’, The Tempest and its Travels. London: Reaktion, 27–36.Google Scholar
Mowat, Barbara A. 2005. ‘Q2 Othello and the 1606 “Acte to restraine Abuses of Players”’, Editio 22: 91–106.Google Scholar
Mowat, Barbara A., and Werstine, Paul (eds.) 1993. King Lear. By William Shakespeare. Folger Shakespeare Library. New York: Washington Square Press.Google Scholar
Moxon, Joseph 1962. Mechanick Exercises on the Whole Art of Printing (1683–4). Eds. Davis, Herbert and Carter, Harry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mulryne, J. R. (ed.) 1975. Women Beware Women. By Middleton, Thomas. The Revels Plays. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Munday, Anthony, et al. 1911. The Book of Sir Thomas More. Ed. Greg, W. W.. Oxford: Malone.Google Scholar
Munro, Lucy 2005. Children of the Queen’s Revels: A Jacobean Theatre Repertory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Andrew 2003. Shakespeare in Print: A History and Chronology of Shakespeare Publishing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew (ed.) 2007. A Concise Companion to Shakespeare and the Text. Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, Andrew 2008. Shakespeare for the People: Working-class Readers, 1800–1900. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew 2010. ‘Shakespeare Goes Digital: Three Open Internet Editions’, Shakespeare Quarterly 61.3: 401–14.Google Scholar
Murphy, Andrew 2013. ‘Configuring the Book’, Early Modern Literary Studies. Special Issue 21. http://extra.shu.ac.uk/emls/si-21/02-Murphy_ConfiguringTheBook.htm (accessed June 2013).Google Scholar
Murray, Christopher 2004. Sean O’Casey: Writer at Work. A Biography. Dublin: Gill & Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myklebost, Svenn-Arve forthcoming 2016. ‘Comic Books and Manga’, in Smith, Bruce (Gen. Ed.) The Cambridge Guide to the Worlds of Shakespeare. 2 vols. New York: Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nashe, Thomas 1593. The apologie of Pierce Pennilesse. Or, strange newes, of the intercepting certaine letters.Google Scholar
Neidig, William J. 1910. ‘The Shakespeare Quartos of 1619’, Modern Philology 8: 145–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neill, Michael 1994. ‘Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic Power in Shakespeare’s Histories’, Shakespeare Quarterly 45:1: 1–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Alan 2005. ‘Shakespeare and the Bibliophiles: From the Earliest Years to 1616’, in Myers, Robin, Harris, Michael, and Mandelbrote, Giles (eds.) Owners, Annotators, and the Signs of Reading. London: British Museum, 49–74.Google Scholar
‘The New Variorum Shakespeare Digital Challenge: The Second Round’. Modern Language Association. http://www.mla.org/nvs_challenge (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Norton, David. 2005. A Textual History of the King James Bible. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nunberg, Geoffrey (ed.) 1996. The Future of the Book. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
O’Connor, Marion 2007. ‘The Witch’, in Taylor, Gary and Lavagnino, John (eds.) Thomas Middleton and Early Modern Textual Culture. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 995–1009.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 1981. ‘What is a Text?’, Research Opportunities in Renaissance Drama 24: 3–6.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 1991. ‘The Poetics of Incomprehensibility’, Shakespeare Quarterly 42: 431–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 1993. ‘Acting Scripts, Performing Texts’, in McLeod, Randall (ed.) Crisis in Editing. New York: AMS, 251–94.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 2000. ‘Margins of Truth’, in Murphy, Andrew (ed.) The Renaissance Text: Theory, Editing, Textuality, Manchester: Manchester University Press, 91–107.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 2002. The Authentic Shakespeare and other Problems of the Early Modern Stage. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Orgel, Stephen 2007. ‘Shakespeare Illustrated’, in Shaughnessy, Robert (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Shakespeare and Popular Culture. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orrell, John 1977–78. ‘The London Stage in the Florentine Correspondence 1604–18’, Theatre Research International 3: 155–81.Google Scholar
Osborne, Laurie E. 1996. The Trick of Singularity. Iowa City: University of Iowa Press.Google Scholar
‘Ovid’, The Roman Empire in the First Century. PBS. www.pbs.org/empires/romans/empire/ovid.html (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Ovid 1594. P. Ouidii Nasonis Heroidum epistolæ. Amorum, libri III De arte amandi, libri III De remedio amor.Google Scholar
Oxley, Philip 1987. A Critical Edition of John Fletcher’s ‘The Humorous Lieutenant’. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Oya, Reiko 2007. Representing Shakespearean Tragedy: Garrick the Kembles, and Kean. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Palfrey, Simon, and Stern, Tiffany 2007. Shakespeare in Parts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pechter, Edward 1997. ‘Making Love to Our Employment; or, the Immateriality of Arguments about the Materiality of the Shakespearean Text’, Textual Practice 11: 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pedicord, Harry William 1981. ‘George Colman’s Adaptation of Garrick’s Promptbook for Florizel and Perdita’, Theatre Survey 22:2: 185–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peele, George 1961a. The Battle of Alcazar, in Yoklavich, J. and Prouty, Charles Tyler (eds.) The Life and Works of George Peele. 3 vols. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Peele, George 1961b. Edward I in The Life and Works of George Peele, in Hook, Frank S. and Prouty, Charles Tyler (eds.) The Life and Works of George Peele, 3 vols. New Haven, Conn. and London: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pellis, Valeria 2013. ‘Refashioning Drama in New Media and Hybrid Culture: The Anatomy of Shakespeare’s Tragedies and Comedies in OEL Manga’. Unpublished paper presented at the Sixteenth AIA conference, Parma.Google Scholar
Percy, William 1824. The Cuck-Queanes and Cuckolds Errants. Ed. Haslewood, Joseph. London: from the Shakspeare Press by W. Nicol.Google Scholar
Pickwoad, Nicholas 1995. ‘The Interpretation of Bookbinding Structure: An Examination of Sixteenth-Century Bindings in the Ramey Collection in the Pierpont Morgan Library’, The Library 6th ser. 17: 209–49.Google Scholar
Pickwoad, Nicholas 2005. Review of Bennett, Trade Bookbinding in the British Isles 1660–1800. The Library 7th ser. 6:4: 464–5.Google Scholar
Platter, Thomas 1937 [1599]. Thomas Platter’s Travels in England, 1599. Trans. Williams, Clare. London: J. Cape.Google Scholar
Pollard, Alfred W. 1906. ‘A Literary Causerie: Shakespeare in the Remainder Market’, The Academy, 528–9.Google Scholar
Pollard, Alfred W. 1909. Shakespeare Folios and Quartos: A Study in the Bibliography of Shakespeare’s Plays, 1594–1685. London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Pollard, Alfred W., and Redgrave, G. R. (eds.) 1926 A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad, 1475-1640. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Pollard, Alfred W., and Redgrave, G. R. (eds.) 1976–91. A Short-Title Catalogue of Books Printed in England, Scotland, & Ireland and of English Books Printed Abroad, 1475–1640. Revised by Jackson, W. A., Ferguson, F. S., and Pantzer, Katharine F.. 2nd edn. 3 vols. London: Bibliographical Society.Google Scholar
Pollard, Alfred W., Redgrave, Gilbert R., Chapman, R. W., and Greg, W. W.. 1926. ‘“Facsimile” Reprints of Old Books’, The Library 4th ser. 6:4: 305–28.Google Scholar
Poole, William 2003. ‘“Unpointed Words”: Shakespearean Syntax in Action’, Cambridge Quarterly 32: 27–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pope, Alexander 1963. ‘The Dunciad’, in The Poems of Alexander Pope. The Twickenham Edition of the Poems of Pope, Alexander. Ed. Sutherland, James. 3rd edn. 5 vols. London: Methuen, 247–409.Google Scholar
Pope, Alexander 1986. ‘The Preface of the Editor to The Works of Shakespear (1725)’, in Cowler, Rosemary (ed.) The Prose Works of Alexander Pope. 2 vols. Hamden, Conn.: Archon Books, 2. 13–40.Google Scholar
Pope, Rob. 1995. Textual Intervention: Critical and Creative Strategies for Literary Studies. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Potter, Lois 1999. ‘Humor Out of Breath: Francis Gentleman and the Henry IV Plays’, in Potter, Lois and Kinney, Arthur (eds.) Shakespeare: Text and Theater. Newark: University of Delaware Press, 285–97.Google Scholar
Pratt, Aaron T. In progress. ‘Stab-Stitching and the Status of Playbooks as Literature’, in ‘Early Modern Print Culture and the Status of Playbooks as Literature’. PhD dissertation. Yale University.Google Scholar
Preston, Thomas 1910. Cambyses King of Persia. Ed. Farmer, John. Amersham: Tudor Facsimile Texts.Google Scholar
Quiller-Couch, A., and Wilson, J. Dover (eds.) 1921. The Tempest. New Cambridge Shakespeare. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Quinn, James T. 1972. ‘Antiquarianism as Moral Theory on the London Stage from 1794 to 1817: A Study of the Interrelationships between the Arts of Poetry and Painting in the Theatrical Productions of John Philip Kemble’. Unpublished dissertation, Ohio University.Google Scholar
Raber, Karen 2013. Animal Bodies, Renaissance Culture. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rackin, Phyllis 1994. ‘Foreign Country: The Place of Women and Sexuality in Shakespeare’s Historical World’ in Burt, Richard and Archer, John Michael (eds.) Enclosure Acts: Sexuality, Property, and Culture in Early Modern England, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press, 68–95.Google Scholar
Ramsay, Stephen 2011. Reading Machines: Toward an Algorithmic Criticism (Urbana, Ill.: University of Illinois Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rancière, Jacques 2009. The Emancipated Spectator. Trans. Elliott, Gregory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Randel, Don Michael 1992. ‘The Canons in the Musicological Toolbox’, in Bergeron, Katherine and Bohlman, Philip V. (eds.) Disciplining Music: Musicology and its Canons. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 10–22.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric 1997. ‘Anonymity and the Erasure of Shakespeare’s First Eighteenth-Century Editor’, in Gondris, J. (ed.) Reading Readings: Essays on Shakespeare Editing in the Eighteenth Century. Madison, NJ: Fairleigh Dickenson University Press, 318–22.Google Scholar
Rasmussen, Eric 2003. ‘Richly Noted: A Case for Collation Inflation’, in Thompson, Ann and McMullan, Gordon (eds.) In Arden: Editing Shakespeare. London: Thomson Learning, 211–18.Google Scholar
Raymond, Joad 2003. Pamphlets and Pamphleteering in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Redding, David Coleman 1960. ‘Robert Bishop’s Commonplace Book: An Edition of a Seventeenth-Century Miscellany’. PhD dissertation. University of Pennsylvania.Google Scholar
Rehearsal 2 2103. Sotto FilmWorks LLC. App.Google Scholar
Reid, S. W. 2007. ‘Compositor B’s Speech-Prefixes in the First Folio of Shakespeare and the Question of Copy for 2 Henry IV’, Studies in Bibliography 58: 73–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Review of Alexander Pope’s edition of Shakespeare, Weekly Journal or Saturday’s Post, 20 March 1725: 2075–6.Google Scholar
Roberts, Jeanne A. 1980. ‘Ralph Crane and the Text of The Tempest’, Shakespeare Studies 13: 213–33.Google Scholar
Roberts, Sasha 2003. Reading Shakespeare’s Poems in Early Modern England. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sasha 2007. ‘Women’s Literary Capital in Early Modern England: Formal Composition and Rhetorical Display in Manuscript and Print’, Women’s Writing 14: 246–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, Benedict Scott 2002. ‘Thomas Heywood and the Cultural Politics of Play Collections’, Studies in English Literature 42:2: 361–80.Google Scholar
Robinson, P. R. 1980. ‘“The Booklet”: A Self-Contained Unit in Composite Manuscripts’, Codicologica 3: 46–69.Google Scholar
Romeo and Juliet: Explore Shakespeare 2012. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. App.Google Scholar
Rooney, M. W 1856. Hamlet First Edition (1603). The Last Leaf of the Lately Discovered Copy, Carefully Reprinted, With A Narrative of Its Discovery.Google Scholar
Rose, Mark 1972. Shakespearean Design. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Katherine 2012. ‘Sampling the Media Habits of a Shakespeare Company: Testing a Software Prototype in Rehearsal’, Shakespeare Bulletin 30: 523–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rowe, Nicholas 1709. ‘Some Account of the Life of Mr. William Shakespear’, The Works of Mr. William Shakespear, vol. 1: i–xl.Google Scholar
Ryan, Marie-Laure 2004. ‘Multivariant Narratives’, in Schreibman, Susan, Siemens, Ray, and Unsworth, John (eds.) A Companion to Digital Humanities, Malden, Mass.: Blackwell, 415–30.Google Scholar
Salmon, Vivien 1962. ‘Early Seventeenth-Century Punctuation as a Guide to Sentence Structure’, Review of English Studies 13: 347–60.Google Scholar
Sanders, Julie 2011. The Cultural Geography of Early Modern Drama. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Saunders, Robert 1823. A Catalogue of the Library: Splendid Books of Prints, Poetical and Historical Tracts, of David Garrick, Esq.Google Scholar
Schäfer, Jürgen 1970. ‘The Orthography of Proper Names in Modern-Spelling Editions of Shakespeare’, Studies in Bibliography 23: 1–19.Google Scholar
Schneider, Ben Ross Jr., 1974. Travels in Computerland; or, Incompatibilities and Interfaces: A Full and True Account of the Implementation of the London Stage Information Bank. Reading, Mass.: Addison–Wesley.Google Scholar
Schoenbaum, Samuel 1966. Internal Evidence and Elizabethan Dramatic Authorship. Evanston, Ill.: Northwestern University Press.Google Scholar
Schuessler, Jennifer 2013. ‘Much Ado about Who: Is It Really Shakespeare?’ New York Times, August 13, sect. A.Google Scholar
Schweidler, Max 2006. The Restoration of Engravings, Drawings, Books, and other Works on Paper. Trans. Perkinson, Roy. Los Angeles, Calif.: Getty Conservation Institute.Google Scholar
Scragg, Leah 1997. ‘Edward Blount and the Prefatory Material to the First Folio of Shakespeare’, Bulletin of the John Rylands University Library of Manchester 79: 117–26.Google Scholar
Seary, Peter 1990. Lewis Theobald and the Editing of Shakespeare. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Sellers, Peter 1965. ‘A Hard Day’s Night’. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zLEMncv140s (accessed 25 March 2015).Google Scholar
Shaaber, M. A. (ed.) 1940. The Second Part of Henry the Fourth. A New Variorum Edition. New York: Modern Language Association.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1594a. The first part of the contention betwixt the two famous houses of Yorke and Lancaster with the death of the good Duke Humphrey.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1599b. The most excellent and lamentable tragedie, of Romeo and Iuliet.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1619. The Whole Contention betweene the two Famous Houses, Lancaster and Yorke.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1709. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear; in Six volumes … Revis’d and Corrected. Ed. Rowe, Nicholas.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1714. The Works of Mr. William Shakespear, in Nine Volumes: With his Life, by N. Rowe, Esq. Ed. Rowe, Nicholas. 2nd edn. 9 vols.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1725. The Works of Shakespear. In Six Volumes. Collated and Corrected by the Former Editions, by Mr. Pope. Ed. Pope, Alexander. 6 vols.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1733. The Works of Shakespeare: in Seven Volumes. Ed. Theobald, Lewis. 7 vols.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1740. The Works of Shakespeare in Seven Volumes. Collated with the Oldest Copies, and Corrected; With Notes, Explanatory, and Critical: by Mr. Theobald. Ed. Theobald, Lewis. 2nd edn. 12 vols.Google Scholar
Shakespeare, William 1744. The Works of Shakespear. In Six Volumes. Carefully Revised and Corrected by the Former Editions, and Adorned with Sculptures, etc. Eds. Hanmer, Thomas and Hayman, Francis.Google Scholar