Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-gq7q9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-21T07:29:49.394Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 September 2009

Andrea Tyler
Affiliation:
Georgetown University, Washington DC
Vyvyan Evans
Affiliation:
University of Sussex
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Semantics of English Prepositions
Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning, and Cognition
, pp. 238 - 245
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baillargeon, R. 1993. The object concept revisited: new directions in the investigation of infants' physical knowledge. In Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy, ed. by C. Granrud, 265–315. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Baillargeon, R. 1995. A Model of Physical Reasoning in Infancy. Advances in Infancy Research, volume ⅹ, ed. by C. Rovee-Collier and L. Lipsitt, 305–71. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Baillargeon, R.Needham, A. and DeVos, J. 1991. Location memory in 8-month-old infants in a non-search AB task: further evidence. Cognitive Development, 4: 345–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, Robert. 1988. Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology: The Origins of American English Words. New York: HarperCollins
Bertenthal, B. 1993. Infants' perception of biomechanical motions: intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy, ed. by C. Granrud, 175–214. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bietel, Dinara, Raymond Gibbs, and Paul Sanders. 1997. The embodied approach to the polysemy of the spatial preposition on. In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ed. by H. Cuyckens and B. Zawada, 241–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bowerman, Melissa. 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett, 385–436. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Bransford, J., and M. K. Johnson. 1973. Consideration of some problems in comprehension. In Visual Information Processing, ed. by W. G. Chase, 39–61. New York: Academic Press
Brisard, Frank. 1997. The English tense-system as an epistemic category: the case of futurity. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, ed. by M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, and E. Sweetser, 271–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Brugman, Claudia. 1981. The story of over. MA thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. Published, 1988, as The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland Press
Brugman, Claudia, and George Lakoff. 1988. Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, ed. by S. Small, G. Cottrell and M. Tannenhaus, 477–507. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. 238
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. Rowley, MA: Heinle and Heinle
Choi, Sylvia, and Melissa, Bowerman. 1992. Learning to expressmotion eventsin English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41: 83–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, Eve
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Nonlinguistic strategies in the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2:161–82Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, H. 1973. Space, time, semantics and the child. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, ed. by T. E. Moore, 27–64. New York: Academic Press
Coriston-Oliver, Monica. 2001. Central meanings of polysemous prepositions: challenging the assumptions. Paper given at International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Santa Barbara, CA
Croft, William. 1998. Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (2): 151–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cuyckens, Hubert, Dominiek Sandra, and Sally Rice. 1997. Towards an empirical lexical semantics. In Human Contact Through Language and Linguistics, ed. by B. Smieja and M. Tasch, 35–54. Berlin: Peter Lang
Deane, Paul. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown
Dewell, Robert. 1994. Over again: image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (4): 351–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René. 1993. Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of English prepositions. In The Semantics of Prepositions: From Mental Processing to Natural Language, ed. by C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 73–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Eimas, P., and , P. Quinn. 1994. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development, 65: 903–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Vyvyan. 2000. The structure of time: language, meaning and temporal cognition. PhD thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, Georgetown University
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark, Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2): 133–87Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books
Fillmore, Charles. 1971. Towards a theory of deixis. The PCCLLU Papers, 3 (4): 219–41. Dept. of Linguistics, University of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Paul, Kay, and Mary, Catherine O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64 (3): 501–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1999. Discourse markers across languages: implications of a case study for historico-comparative and sociolinguistics. Paper presented at Dept. of Linguistics, Georgetown University, November 1999
Frank, Marcella. 1972. Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Freeman, N., S. Lloyd, and C. Sinha. 1980. Infant search tasks reveal early concepts of containment and canonical usage of objects. Cognition,8:243–62
Frisson, S., Dominiek Sandra, Frank Brisard, and Hubert Cuyckens. 1996. From one meaning to the next: the effects of polysemous relationships in lexical learning. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, ed. by M. Putz and René Dirven, 613–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Garrod, Simon, Gillian, Ferrier, and Siobhan, Campbell. 1999. In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72: 167–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, Raymond, and Teenie Matlock. 1997. Psycholinguistic perspectives on polysemy. In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ed. by H. Cuyckens and B. Zawada, 213–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Gleitman, Leila. 2000. Remarks on language acquisition in the first 2 years. Paper given at the University of Maryland Child Language Acquisition Symposium, College Park, MD, March 2000
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Grady, Joseph. 1997a. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. ParhD dissertation, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley
Grady, Joseph. 1997b. THEORIES ARE BUILDING REVISITED. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (4): 267–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1999a. A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation versus resemblance. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by R. Gibbs and G. Steen, 79–100. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Grady, Joseph. 1999b. Cross-linguistic regularities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the LSA, January 1999, Los Angeles. In preparation. Foundations of meaning (ms.). Cultural Logic, Washington, DC
Green, Georgia. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. ⅲ, Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press
Grice, Paul. 1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. ⅸ, Pragmatics, ed. by P. Cole, 113–28. New York: Academic Press
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Haiman, John. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua, 50: 326–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Trevor. 1995. The Psychology of Language. Hove: Psychology Press Hawkins, Bruce. 1988. The category medium. In Topics in Cognitive Grammar, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 231–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Herskovits, Annette. 1988. Spatial expressions and the plasticity of meaning. In Topics in Cognitive Grammar, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 271–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hilferty, Joseph. 1999. Through as a means to metaphor. In Issues in Cognitive Linguis-tics, ed. by L. de Stadler and C. Eyrich, 347 66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Hill, Clifford Alden. 1978. Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 524 38. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Press
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hottenroth, Priska-Monika. 1993. Prepositions and object concepts: a contribution to cognitive semantics. In The Semantics of Prepositions, ed. by C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 179 219. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1992. Languages of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Johnson, Christopher. 1999. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: the case of see. In Cultural, Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox, 155 69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Jones, S., and , L. Smith. (1993). The place of perception in children's concepts. Cognitive Development, 8:113–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, and Charles, Fillmore. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75 (1): 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Anatol. (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: a study in the conceptualiza-tion of space. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4): 291–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, George. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought (second edition), ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. Ⅰ. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1991a). Concept, Image and Symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, Ronald. (1991b). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. Ⅱ. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1992). Prepositions as grammaticalizing elements. Leuvenese Bijdragen, 81: 287 309
Langacker, Ronald. (1999a). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, Ronald. (1999b). Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Cognitive Linguistics: Foun-dations, Scope and Methodology, ed. by Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker, 13 59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Lanman, Charles Rockwell. 1884. A Sanskrit Reader. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Legerstee, M. (1992.) A review of the animate inanimate distinction in infancy: im-plications for models of social and cognitive knowing. Early Development and Parenting, 1: 59–67
Leslie, A. (1984.) Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. British Journal of Devel-opmental Psychology, 2:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. Towards a Lexical Organization of English Verbs. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lindner, Susan. 1981. A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with out and up. PhD thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego
Lindstromberg, Seth. 1998. English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Lloyd, S., C Sinha, and , N Freeman. (1981). Spatial reference systems and the canon-icality effect in infant search. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32:1–10CrossRef
Mandler, Jean. (1988). How to build a baby: on the development of an accessible repre-sentational system. Cognitive Development, 3: 113–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean. (1992). How to build a baby: Ⅱ. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99: 587–604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, Jean. (1996). Preverbal representation and language. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett, 365–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Miller, George, and Phillip Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Morgan, Pamela. (1997). Figuring out figure out: metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4): 327–57Google Scholar
O'Dowd, Elizabeth. 1998. Prepositions and Particles in English: A Discourse-functional Account. New York: Oxford University Press
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Günter Radden. 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Pfleider, Jean, and Michael Preston. 1981. A Complete Concordance to the Chester Mystery Plays. New York: Garland
Piaget, Jean. 1951. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trübner
Pustejovsky, James. 1998. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Putnam, Hilary, 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Quinn, P., and P. Eimas. 1997. Perceptual organization and categorization in young infants. In Advances in Infancy Research, vol. ⅺ, ed. by C. Rovee-Collier and L. Lipsitt, 1 36. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Quinn, P., Eimas, P, and Rosenkrantz, S..(1993). Evidence for representations of perceptual similar categories by 3-month-old infantsPerception, 22: 463–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Harlow, England: Longman. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow, England: Longman
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284 324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rice, Sally. 1993. Far afield in lexical fields: the English prepositions. ESCOL*92(ed. by M. Bernstein), 206 17
Rice, Sally, Dominiek Sandra, and Mia Vanrespaille. 1999. Prepositional semantics and the fragile link between space and time. In Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995, ed. by M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox, 108 27. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Rosch, Eleanor. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 192–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. Rosch, Eleanor (1978). Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by E. Rosch and B. Lloyd, 27 48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany: State University of New York
Rummelhart, David. 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In Representations and Understanding, ed. by D. Bobrow and A. Collins, 211 36. New York: Academic Press
Sandra, Dominiek. (1998). What linguists can and can't tell us about the mind: a reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (4): 361–78Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, and Sally, Rice. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: mirroring whose mind the linguist's or the language user's?Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (1): 89–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand De. [1915] 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. and annot. by Roy Harris. London: Duckworth
Schiffrin, Deborah. (1992). Anaphoric then: aspectual, textual and epistemic meaning. Linguistics, 30: 753–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris, and Kristine, Jensen De Ló;pez. (2000). Language, culture and the embodi-ment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (1/2): 17–42Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan. (1991). Learning to think for speaking.Pragmatics 1, 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. 1988. Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: the apprehension of objects in infancy. In Perceptual Development in Infancy, ed. by A. Yonas, 197 234. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sweetser, Eve. 1997. Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In Language and Con-ceptualization, ed. by J. Nuyts and E. Pederson, 116 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard. (1983). How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, ed. by H. Pick and L. Acredolo, 225 82. New York: PlenumCrossRef
Talmy, Leonard. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Descriptions, vol. ⅲ, ed. by T. Shopen, 57 149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard (1988a). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12: 49–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1988b). The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Talmy, Leonard (1996). Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett, 211 76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Talmy, Leonard (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Taylor, John. 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1975). Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing. Semiotica, 15 (3): 207–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Universals of Human Language, ed. by J. Greenberg, 369–400. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65 (1): 31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading Minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Turner, Mark. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 1999. Applying cognitive linguistics to language teaching: the prepositions of verticality. Paper presented at the Annual Association of Applied Linguistics, Stamford, Connecticut, March 1999
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2001a. The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition and Language Pedagogy, ed. by M. Pütz, S. Niemeier and R. Dirven, 63 105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2001b. Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over. Language, 77 (4): 724 65
Tyler, Andrea, Akiko Fuji, Seon Jeon, Dainora Kupcinskas, Olga Liamkina, David Macgregor, Kristin Mulrooney, and Mari Takada. 2001. Competing models of over: an experimental investigation. Paper presented at Washington CogLink Sym-posium. Georgetown University, Washington, DC. October 2001
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans Jürg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman
Vandeloise, Claude. 1990. Representation, prototypes and centrality. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 403 37. London: Routledge
Vandeloise, Claude. 1991. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study in French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Vandeloise, Claude. 1994. Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (2): 157 84CrossRef
Varela, Francisco, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1990. ‘Prototypes save’: on the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘prototype’ in linguistics and related fields. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 347 67. London: Routledge
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1993. Why do we say in April, on Thursday, at 10 o'clock? In search of an explanation. Studies in Language, 17 (2): 437 54CrossRef
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press
Wilson, Paul, and Richard Anderson. 1986. What they don't know will hurt them: the role of prior knowledge in comprehension. In Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice, ed. by J. Orasunu, 31 48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ziegler, Debra. (1997). Retention in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (3): 207–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baillargeon, R. 1993. The object concept revisited: new directions in the investigation of infants' physical knowledge. In Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy, ed. by C. Granrud, 265–315. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Baillargeon, R. 1995. A Model of Physical Reasoning in Infancy. Advances in Infancy Research, volume ⅹ, ed. by C. Rovee-Collier and L. Lipsitt, 305–71. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Baillargeon, R.Needham, A. and DeVos, J. 1991. Location memory in 8-month-old infants in a non-search AB task: further evidence. Cognitive Development, 4: 345–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnhart, Robert. 1988. Barnhart Concise Dictionary of Etymology: The Origins of American English Words. New York: HarperCollins
Bertenthal, B. 1993. Infants' perception of biomechanical motions: intrinsic image and knowledge-based constraints. In Visual Perception and Cognition in Infancy, ed. by C. Granrud, 175–214. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Bietel, Dinara, Raymond Gibbs, and Paul Sanders. 1997. The embodied approach to the polysemy of the spatial preposition on. In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ed. by H. Cuyckens and B. Zawada, 241–60. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Bloomfield, Leonard. 1933. Language. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston
Bolinger, Dwight. 1971. The Phrasal Verb in English. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
Bowerman, Melissa. 1996. Learning how to structure space for language: a crosslinguistic perspective. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel, and M. Garrett, 385–436. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Bransford, J., and M. K. Johnson. 1973. Consideration of some problems in comprehension. In Visual Information Processing, ed. by W. G. Chase, 39–61. New York: Academic Press
Brisard, Frank. 1997. The English tense-system as an epistemic category: the case of futurity. In Lexical and Syntactical Constructions and the Construction of Meaning, ed. by M. Verspoor, K. D. Lee, and E. Sweetser, 271–86. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Brugman, Claudia. 1981. The story of over. MA thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley. Published, 1988, as The Story of Over: Polysemy, Semantics and the Structure of the Lexicon. New York: Garland Press
Brugman, Claudia, and George Lakoff. 1988. Cognitive topology and lexical networks. In Lexical Ambiguity Resolution, ed. by S. Small, G. Cottrell and M. Tannenhaus, 477–507. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufman. 238
Bybee, Joan, Revere Perkins, and William Pagliuca. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Celce-Murcia, Marianne, and Diane Larsen-Freeman. 1999. The Grammar Book: An ESL/EFL Teacher's Course. Rowley, MA: Heinle and Heinle
Choi, Sylvia, and Melissa, Bowerman. 1992. Learning to expressmotion eventsin English and Korean: the influence of language-specific lexicalization patterns. Cognition, 41: 83–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, Noam. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton
Chomsky, Noam. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Clark, Eve
Chomsky, Noam. 1973. Nonlinguistic strategies in the acquisition of word meanings. Cognition, 2:161–82Google Scholar
Clark, Herbert, H. 1973. Space, time, semantics and the child. In Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, ed. by T. E. Moore, 27–64. New York: Academic Press
Coriston-Oliver, Monica. 2001. Central meanings of polysemous prepositions: challenging the assumptions. Paper given at International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Santa Barbara, CA
Croft, William. 1998. Linguistic evidence and mental representations. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (2): 151–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cruse, Alan. 1986. Lexical Semantics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Cuyckens, Hubert, Dominiek Sandra, and Sally Rice. 1997. Towards an empirical lexical semantics. In Human Contact Through Language and Linguistics, ed. by B. Smieja and M. Tasch, 35–54. Berlin: Peter Lang
Deane, Paul. 1992. Grammar in Mind and Brain: Explorations in Cognitive Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Dennett, Daniel. 1991. Consciousness Explained. Boston: Little Brown
Dewell, Robert. 1994. Over again: image-schema transformations in semantic analysis. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (4): 351–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dirven, René. 1993. Dividing up physical and mental space into conceptual categories by means of English prepositions. In The Semantics of Prepositions: From Mental Processing to Natural Language, ed. by C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 73–97. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Eimas, P., and , P. Quinn. 1994. Studies on the formation of perceptually based basic-level categories in young infants. Child Development, 65: 903–17CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Vyvyan. 2000. The structure of time: language, meaning and temporal cognition. PhD thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, Georgetown University
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1994. Mental Spaces. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark, Turner. 1998. Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22 (2): 133–87Google Scholar
Fauconnier, Gilles, and Mark Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind's Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books
Fillmore, Charles. 1971. Towards a theory of deixis. The PCCLLU Papers, 3 (4): 219–41. Dept. of Linguistics, University of HawaiiGoogle Scholar
Fillmore, Charles, Paul, Kay, and Mary, Catherine O'Connor. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64 (3): 501–38CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fleischman, Suzanne. 1999. Discourse markers across languages: implications of a case study for historico-comparative and sociolinguistics. Paper presented at Dept. of Linguistics, Georgetown University, November 1999
Frank, Marcella. 1972. Modern English: A Practical Reference Guide. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall
Freeman, N., S. Lloyd, and C. Sinha. 1980. Infant search tasks reveal early concepts of containment and canonical usage of objects. Cognition,8:243–62
Frisson, S., Dominiek Sandra, Frank Brisard, and Hubert Cuyckens. 1996. From one meaning to the next: the effects of polysemous relationships in lexical learning. In The Construal of Space in Language and Thought, ed. by M. Putz and René Dirven, 613–47. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Garrod, Simon, Gillian, Ferrier, and Siobhan, Campbell. 1999. In and on: investigating the functional geometry of spatial prepositions. Cognition, 72: 167–89CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbs, Raymond, and Teenie Matlock. 1997. Psycholinguistic perspectives on polysemy. In Polysemy in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the Fifth International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, ed. by H. Cuyckens and B. Zawada, 213–39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Gleitman, Leila. 2000. Remarks on language acquisition in the first 2 years. Paper given at the University of Maryland Child Language Acquisition Symposium, College Park, MD, March 2000
Goldberg, Adele. 1995. Constructions: A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Grady, Joseph. 1997a. Foundations of meaning: primary metaphors and primary scenes. ParhD dissertation, Dept. of Linguistics, UC Berkeley
Grady, Joseph. 1997b. THEORIES ARE BUILDING REVISITED. Cognitive Linguistics, 4 (4): 267–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grady, Joseph. 1999a. A typology of motivation for conceptual metaphor: correlation versus resemblance. In Metaphor in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by R. Gibbs and G. Steen, 79–100. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Grady, Joseph. 1999b. Cross-linguistic regularities. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the LSA, January 1999, Los Angeles. In preparation. Foundations of meaning (ms.). Cultural Logic, Washington, DC
Green, Georgia. 1989. Pragmatics and Natural Language Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Grice, Paul. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. ⅲ, Speech Acts, ed. by P. Cole and J. Morgan, 41–58. New York: Academic Press
Grice, Paul. 1978. Further notes on logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. ⅸ, Pragmatics, ed. by P. Cole, 113–28. New York: Academic Press
Gumperz, John. 1982. Discourse Strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Haiman, John. 1980. Dictionaries and encyclopedias. Lingua, 50: 326–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, Trevor. 1995. The Psychology of Language. Hove: Psychology Press Hawkins, Bruce. 1988. The category medium. In Topics in Cognitive Grammar, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 231–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Heine, Bernd. 1997. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Herskovits, Annette. 1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of the Prepositions in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Herskovits, Annette. 1988. Spatial expressions and the plasticity of meaning. In Topics in Cognitive Grammar, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 271–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Hilferty, Joseph. 1999. Through as a means to metaphor. In Issues in Cognitive Linguis-tics, ed. by L. de Stadler and C. Eyrich, 347 66. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Hill, Clifford Alden. 1978. Linguistic representation of spatial and temporal orientation. In Proceedings of the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, 524 38. Berkeley: UC Berkeley Press
Hopper, Paul, and Elizabeth Closs Traugott. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Hottenroth, Priska-Monika. 1993. Prepositions and object concepts: a contribution to cognitive semantics. In The Semantics of Prepositions, ed. by C. Zelinsky-Wibbelt, 179 219. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Jackendoff, Ray. 1983. Semantics and Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1987. Consciousness and the Computational Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1992. Languages of the Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Jackendoff, Ray 1997. The Architecture of the Language Faculty. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Johnson, Mark. 1987. The Body in the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Johnson, Christopher. 1999. Metaphor vs. conflation in the acquisition of polysemy: the case of see. In Cultural, Typological and Psychological Perspectives in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox, 155 69. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Jones, S., and , L. Smith. (1993). The place of perception in children's concepts. Cognitive Development, 8:113–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kay, Paul, and Charles, Fillmore. (1999). Grammatical constructions and linguistic generalizations: the what's X doing Y? construction. Language, 75 (1): 1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreitzer, Anatol. (1997). Multiple levels of schematization: a study in the conceptualiza-tion of space. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4): 291–325CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lakoff, George. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, George. 1993. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor. Metaphor and Thought (second edition), ed. by A. Ortony. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books
Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. Ⅰ. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1991a). Concept, Image and Symbol. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, Ronald. (1991b). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. Ⅱ. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press
Langacker, Ronald. (1992). Prepositions as grammaticalizing elements. Leuvenese Bijdragen, 81: 287 309
Langacker, Ronald. (1999a). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Langacker, Ronald. (1999b). Assessing the cognitive linguistic enterprise. In Cognitive Linguistics: Foun-dations, Scope and Methodology, ed. by Theo Janssen and Gisela Redeker, 13 59. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Lanman, Charles Rockwell. 1884. A Sanskrit Reader. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University
Legerstee, M. (1992.) A review of the animate inanimate distinction in infancy: im-plications for models of social and cognitive knowing. Early Development and Parenting, 1: 59–67
Leslie, A. (1984.) Infant perception of a manual pick-up event. British Journal of Devel-opmental Psychology, 2:19–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levin, Beth. 1993. Towards a Lexical Organization of English Verbs. Chicago: Univer-sity of Chicago Press
Levinson, Stephen. 1983. Pragmatics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Lindner, Susan. 1981. A lexico-semantic analysis of English verb particle constructions with out and up. PhD thesis, Dept. of Linguistics, UC San Diego
Lindstromberg, Seth. 1998. English Prepositions Explained. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Lloyd, S., C Sinha, and , N Freeman. (1981). Spatial reference systems and the canon-icality effect in infant search. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 32:1–10CrossRef
Mandler, Jean. (1988). How to build a baby: on the development of an accessible repre-sentational system. Cognitive Development, 3: 113–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mandler, Jean. (1992). How to build a baby: Ⅱ. Conceptual primitives. Psychological Review, 99: 587–604CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, Jean. (1996). Preverbal representation and language. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett, 365–84. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Miller, George, and Phillip Johnson-Laird. 1976. Language and Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Morgan, Pamela. (1997). Figuring out figure out: metaphor and the semantics of the English verb-particle construction. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (4): 327–57Google Scholar
O'Dowd, Elizabeth. 1998. Prepositions and Particles in English: A Discourse-functional Account. New York: Oxford University Press
Panther, Klaus-Uwe, and Günter Radden. 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Pfleider, Jean, and Michael Preston. 1981. A Complete Concordance to the Chester Mystery Plays. New York: Garland
Piaget, Jean. 1951. Play, Dreams and Imitation in Childhood. London: Kegan Paul, Trench and Trübner
Pustejovsky, James. 1998. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Putnam, Hilary, 1981. Reason, Truth and History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Quinn, P., and P. Eimas. 1997. Perceptual organization and categorization in young infants. In Advances in Infancy Research, vol. ⅺ, ed. by C. Rovee-Collier and L. Lipsitt, 1 36. Norwood, NJ: Ablex
Quinn, P., Eimas, P, and Rosenkrantz, S..(1993). Evidence for representations of perceptual similar categories by 3-month-old infantsPerception, 22: 463–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Quirk, Randolph, Sidney Greenbaum, Geoffrey Leech, and Jan Svartvik. 1972. A Grammar of Contemporary English. Harlow, England: Longman. 1985. A Comprehensive Grammar of the English Language. Harlow, England: Longman
Reddy, Michael. 1979. The conduit metaphor: a case of frame conflict in our language about language. In Metaphor and Thought, ed. by A. Ortony, 284 324. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Rice, Sally. 1993. Far afield in lexical fields: the English prepositions. ESCOL*92(ed. by M. Bernstein), 206 17
Rice, Sally, Dominiek Sandra, and Mia Vanrespaille. 1999. Prepositional semantics and the fragile link between space and time. In Cultural, Psychological and Typological Issues in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers of the Bi-annual ICLA Meeting in Albuquerque, July 1995, ed. by M. Hiraga, C. Sinha and S. Wilcox, 108 27. Philadelphia: John Benjamins
Rosch, Eleanor. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104: 192–233CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosch, Eleanor. Rosch, Eleanor (1978). Principles of categorization. In Cognition and Categorization, ed. by E. Rosch and B. Lloyd, 27 48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ruhl, Charles. 1989. On Monosemy: A Study in Linguistic Semantics. Albany: State University of New York
Rummelhart, David. 1975. Notes on a schema for stories. In Representations and Understanding, ed. by D. Bobrow and A. Collins, 211 36. New York: Academic Press
Sandra, Dominiek. (1998). What linguists can and can't tell us about the mind: a reply to Croft. Cognitive Linguistics, 9 (4): 361–78Google Scholar
Sandra, Dominiek, and Sally, Rice. (1995). Network analyses of prepositional meaning: mirroring whose mind the linguist's or the language user's?Cognitive Linguistics, 6 (1): 89–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saussure, Ferdinand De. [1915] 1983. Course in General Linguistics. Trans. and annot. by Roy Harris. London: Duckworth
Schiffrin, Deborah. (1992). Anaphoric then: aspectual, textual and epistemic meaning. Linguistics, 30: 753–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sinha, Chris, and Kristine, Jensen De Ló;pez. (2000). Language, culture and the embodi-ment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11 (1/2): 17–42Google Scholar
Slobin, Dan. (1991). Learning to think for speaking.Pragmatics 1, 7–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spelke, E. 1988. Where perceiving ends and thinking begins: the apprehension of objects in infancy. In Perceptual Development in Infancy, ed. by A. Yonas, 197 234. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Sperber, Dan, and Deirdre Wilson. 1986. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell
Svorou, Soteria. 1994. The Grammar of Space. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Sweetser, Eve. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Sweetser, Eve. 1997. Role and individual interpretations of change predicates. In Language and Con-ceptualization, ed. by J. Nuyts and E. Pederson, 116 36. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard. (1983). How language structures space. Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, ed. by H. Pick and L. Acredolo, 225 82. New York: PlenumCrossRef
Talmy, Leonard. (1985). Lexicalization patterns: semantic structure in lexical forms. In Language Typology and Syntactic Descriptions, vol. ⅲ, ed. by T. Shopen, 57 149. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
Talmy, Leonard (1988a). Force dynamics in language and cognition. Cognitive Science, 12: 49–100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talmy, Leonard (1988b). The relation of grammar to cognition. In Topics in Cognitive Linguistics, ed. by B. Rudzka-Ostyn, 165–205. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
Talmy, Leonard (1996). Fictive motion in language and ‘ception’. In Language and Space, ed. by P. Bloom, M. Peterson, L. Nadel and M. Garrett, 211 76. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Talmy, Leonard (2000). Toward a Cognitive Semantics (2 vols.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Taylor, John. 1989. Linguistic Categorization. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs. (1975). Spatial expressions of tense and temporal sequencing. Semiotica, 15 (3): 207–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1978). On the expression of spatio-temporal relations in language. In Universals of Human Language, ed. by J. Greenberg, 369–400. Stanford: Stanford University Press
Traugott, Elizabeth Closs (1989). On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65 (1): 31–55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, Mark. 1987. Death is the Mother of Beauty: Mind, Metaphor, Criticism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Turner, Mark. 1991. Reading Minds. Princeton: Princeton University Press
Turner, Mark. 1996. The Literary Mind. New York: Oxford University Press
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 1999. Applying cognitive linguistics to language teaching: the prepositions of verticality. Paper presented at the Annual Association of Applied Linguistics, Stamford, Connecticut, March 1999
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2001a. The relation between experience, conceptual structure and meaning: non-temporal uses of tense and language teaching. In Applied Cognitive Linguistics: Theory, Acquisition and Language Pedagogy, ed. by M. Pütz, S. Niemeier and R. Dirven, 63 105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
Tyler, Andrea, and Vyvyan Evans. 2001b. Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over. Language, 77 (4): 724 65
Tyler, Andrea, Akiko Fuji, Seon Jeon, Dainora Kupcinskas, Olga Liamkina, David Macgregor, Kristin Mulrooney, and Mari Takada. 2001. Competing models of over: an experimental investigation. Paper presented at Washington CogLink Sym-posium. Georgetown University, Washington, DC. October 2001
Ungerer, Friedrich, and Hans Jürg Schmid. 1996. An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman
Vandeloise, Claude. 1990. Representation, prototypes and centrality. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 403 37. London: Routledge
Vandeloise, Claude. 1991. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study in French. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
Vandeloise, Claude. 1994. Methodology and analyses of the preposition in. Cognitive Linguistics, 5 (2): 157 84CrossRef
Varela, Francisco, Evan Thompson, and Eleanor Rosch. 1991. The Embodied Mind: Cognitive Science and Human Experience. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 1990. ‘Prototypes save’: on the uses and abuses of the notion of ‘prototype’ in linguistics and related fields. In Meanings and Prototypes: Studies in Linguistic Categorization, ed. by S. Tsohatzidis, 347 67. London: Routledge
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1993. Why do we say in April, on Thursday, at 10 o'clock? In search of an explanation. Studies in Language, 17 (2): 437 54CrossRef
Wierzbicka, Anna. 1996. Semantics: Primes and Universals. New York: Oxford University Press
Wilson, Paul, and Richard Anderson. 1986. What they don't know will hurt them: the role of prior knowledge in comprehension. In Reading Comprehension: From Research to Practice, ed. by J. Orasunu, 31 48. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum
Ziegler, Debra. (1997). Retention in ontogenetic and diachronic grammaticalization. Cognitive Linguistics, 8 (3): 207–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Andrea Tyler, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Vyvyan Evans, University of Sussex
  • Book: The Semantics of English Prepositions
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Andrea Tyler, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Vyvyan Evans, University of Sussex
  • Book: The Semantics of English Prepositions
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517.010
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Andrea Tyler, Georgetown University, Washington DC, Vyvyan Evans, University of Sussex
  • Book: The Semantics of English Prepositions
  • Online publication: 22 September 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511486517.010
Available formats
×