Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-59b7f5684b-j5sqr Total loading time: 0.869 Render date: 2022-10-03T05:27:02.266Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "displayNetworkTab": true, "displayNetworkMapGraph": true, "useSa": true } hasContentIssue false

Chapter 13 - Comparing Segmental and Prosodic Contributions to Speech Accent

from PART IV - Accentedness and Acoustic Features

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Ratree Wayland
University of Florida
Get access


Research showed that the interlanguage speech intelligibility benefit (ISIB) effect progressively disappeared in Chinese speakers of English as their English proficiency increased and their exposure to Chinese-accented English decreased. As a result, ISIB effects were obvious in less proficient speakers. We explore the hypothesis that ISIB is still present in proficient L2 English speakers when tasks go beyond sound transcription and relate intelligibility to more complex sound-meaning mappings. Results showed that, in general, native English speakers outperformed Chinese speakers of English showing no evidence of an overall ISIB effect despite that Chinese speakers of English rated Chinese-accented sentences as more comprehensible. Only in the compound versus noun contrasts (e.g., ‘bluebird’ vs. ‘blue bird’), Chinese speakers of English outperformed native English speakers in the Chinese-accented stimuli, showing a mild ISIB-L effect. This modest evidence in support of ISIB encourages further exploration on aspects of sound perception that could affect ISIB in proficient L2 speakers.

Second Language Speech Learning
Theoretical and Empirical Progress
, pp. 337 - 349
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Anderson-Hsieh, J., Johnson, R., & Koehler, K. (1992). The relationship between native speaker judgments of nonnative pronunciation and deviance in segmentais, prosody, and syllable structure. Language Learning, 42(4), 529555.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, P. (2001). Praat, a system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International, 5(9/10), 341345.Google Scholar
Chen, Y., Robb, M., Gilbert, H., & Lerman, J. (2001). Vowel production by Mandarin speakers of English. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics, 15(6), 427440.Google Scholar
Chun, D. M. (2002). Discourse intonation in L2: From theory and research to practice (Vol. 1). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, C., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Homebodies and army brats: Some effects of early linguistic experience and residential history on dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change, 16, 3148.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davis, K., & Beckman, M. (1983). Production and perception of the voicing contrast in Indian and American English. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory, 1(7790), 108.Google Scholar
de Mareüil, P. B., & Vieru-Dimulescu, B. (2006). The contribution of prosody to the perception of foreign accent. Phonetica, 63(4), 247267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E., & Eefting, W. (1987). Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 6783.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, J. M., Getty, L. A., Clark, M. J., & Wheeler, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97, 30993111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, B. H., & Jun, S. A. (2011). The effect of age on the acquisition of second language prosody. Language and Speech, 54(3), 387414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, K. H., & Guion, S. G. (2006). Phonological systems in bilinguals: Age of learning effects on the stop consonant systems of Korean-English bilinguals. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 119(3), 16721683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kang, O. (2010). Relative salience of suprasegmental features on judgments of L2 comprehensibility and accentedness. System, 38(2), 301315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kang, O., Vo, S. C. T., & Moran, M. K. (2016). Perceptual judgments of accented speech by listeners from different first language backgrounds. TESL-EJ, 20(1), n1.Google Scholar
Lisker, L., & Abramson, A. (1964). A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word, 20(3), 527565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Major, R. C. (1987). English voiceless stop production by speakers of Brazilian Portuguese. Journal of Phonetics, 15, 197202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maxwell, O., & Fletcher, J. (2009). Acoustic and durational properties of Indian English vowels. World Englishes, 28(1), 5269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCullough, E. A. (2013). Acoustic correlates of perceived foreign accent in non-native English. PhD dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1993). Productions of English vowels by native speakers of Arabic: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Language and Speech, 36(1), 3966.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Munro, M. J., & Derwing, T. M. (2001). Modeling perceptions of the accentedness and comprehensibility of L2 speech the role of speaking rate. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 23(4), 451468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riney, T. J., & Takagi, N. (1999). Global foreign accent and voice onset time among Japanese EFL speakers. Language Learning, 49(2), 275302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schirra, R. E. (2012). Attitudes toward Korean-accented and Korean American English. MA thesis, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Shah, A. (2002). Temporal characteristics of Spanish-accented English: Acoustic measures and their correlation with accented ratings. PhD dissertation, City University of New York.Google Scholar
Shimizu, K. (2011, August). A study on VOT of initial stops in English produced by Korean, Thai and Chinese speakers as L2 learners. In ICPhS (pp. 18181821).Google Scholar
Trofimovich, P., & Baker, W. (2006). Learning second language suprasegmentals: Effect of L2 experience on prosody and fluency characteristics of L2 speech. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28(1), 130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Els, T., & De Bot, K. (1987). The role of intonation in foreign accent. The Modern Language Journal, 71(2), 147155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wayland, R. (1997). Non-native production of Thai: Acoustic measurements and accentedness ratings. Applied Linguistics, 18(3), 345373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats