Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-84b7d79bbc-5lx2p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-31T20:25:46.076Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 November 2015

Peter Collins
Peter Collins
Affiliation:
The Royal Society, London
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960 , pp. 293 - 311
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2015

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Primary Sources

Secondary Sources

ABRC, Allocations of the Science Budget 1989–92 (13 December 1988, published February 1989).Google Scholar
ABRC, The Science Budget: a forward look 1982 (October 1982).Google Scholar
ABRC, Science Budget: allocations 1987–88 (3 December 1986, published February 1987).Google Scholar
ABRC, A strategy for the Science Base (May 1987).Google Scholar
ABRC, A study of commissioned research (Mason report, 1983).Google Scholar
ABRC, Support of university scientific research (the Merrison report: ABRC/UGC, 1982).Google Scholar
Academy of Medical Sciences, British Academy, Royal Academy of Engineering and Royal Society, Fuelling prosperity (April 2013).Google Scholar
Academy of Medical Sciences, Medical Research Council, Royal Society and Wellcome Trust, The use of non-human primates in research (December 2006).Google Scholar
Adam, David, ‘British science champion quits post’, Nature, 417 (6 June 2002), 577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adam, David, ‘Suspicions intensify over elusive European Academy of Sciences’, Nature, 419 (31 October 2002), 865.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Adrian, E.D. ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1954’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 227 (1955), 279–87.Google Scholar
Adrian, E.D., ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1955’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 234 (1956), 151–60.Google Scholar
Agar, Jon, ‘“It’s springtime for science”: renewing China-UK scientific relations in the 1970s’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 67 (2013), 7–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Agar, Jon, ‘Thatcher, scientist’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 65 (2011), 215–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, Jon, ‘What difference did computers make?’, Social studies of science, 36 (2006), 869.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agar, Jon, ‘What happened in the sixties?’, BJHS, 41 (2008), 567–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alter, Peter, ‘The Royal Society and the International Association of Academies, 1897–1919’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 34 (1980), 241–64.Google Scholar
Arnott, Struther, Kibble, T.W.B. and Shallice, Tim, ‘Maurice Hugh Frederick Wilkins’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 52 (2006), 455–78.Google ScholarPubMed
Atiyah, Michael, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 29 November 1991’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 46 (1992), 155–69.Google Scholar
Atiyah, Michael, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1992’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 47 (1993), 109–18.Google Scholar
Balmer, Brian, Godwin, Matthew and Gregory, Jane, ‘The Royal Society and the “brain drain”: natural scientists meet social science’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 63 (2009), 339–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bateson, Patrick, ‘Genetically modified potatoes’, Lancet, 354 (16 October 1999), 1382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beardsley, Tom, ‘Human embryo experiments: societies urge a softer line’, Nature, 302 (28 April 1983), 739.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bevington, John C. and Gowenlock, Brian G., ‘Sir Harry Work Melville’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 48 (2002), 291–308.Google Scholar
Blackett, P.M.S., ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1966’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 296 (1967), v–xiv.Google Scholar
Blackett, P.M.S., ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1968’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 308 (1968), v–xvii.Google Scholar
Blackett, P.M.S., ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1970’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 321 (1971), 1–14.Google Scholar
Blackett, P.M.S., ‘Wanted: a wand over Whitehall’, New Statesman (11 September 1964), 346–50.Google Scholar
Blume, Stuart S., Toward a political sociology of science (Collier Macmillan Publishers, 1974).Google Scholar
Bodmer, Walter, ‘Public understanding of science: the BA, the Royal Society and COPUS’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (September 2010), S151–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Booth, Clive, ‘A war of independence’, Times higher education supplement (9 December 1983), 16.Google Scholar
Bowater, Laura and Yeoman, Kay, Science communication (Wiley-Blackwell, 2013).Google Scholar
Bown, William, ‘A dissident view on life, the universe and democracy’, New scientist (21 July 1990), 19.Google Scholar
Brimelow, Thomas, ‘Anniversary dinner 1974’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 30 (1975), 5–14.Google Scholar
Brock, George, ‘Freedom, but what else can we do for the Falklands?’, Times (16 June 1982), 12.Google Scholar
Brumfiel, Geoff, ‘Nanotechnology: a little knowledge … ’, Nature, 424 (17 July 2003), 246–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brumfiel, Geoff, ‘UK scientists celebrate budget reprieve’, Nature, 467 (27 October 2010), 1017.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bryson, Bill, ed., Seeing further: the story of science and the Royal Society (Harper Press, 2010).Google Scholar
Bud, Robert, ‘From applied microbiology to biotechnology: science, medicine and industrial renewal’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S17–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bud, Robert, The uses of life: a history of biotechnology (Cambridge University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Burgen, Arnold, ‘Academia Europaea: origin and early days’, European review, 17 (2009), 469–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burhop, Eric, ‘The problem of Soviet scientists: a reply to John Ziman’, Nature, 248 (12 April 1974), 542.Google Scholar
Butler, Declan, ‘BSE researchers bemoan “ministry secrecy”’, Nature, 383 (10 October 1996), 467–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butler, Declan and Wadman, Meredith, ‘Calls for cloning ban sell science short’, Nature, 386 (6 March 1997), 8–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Buttimer, Anne, ‘Academia Europaea: founders and founding visions’, European review, 19 (2011), 153–253.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabinet Office, Annual review of government funded R&D 1983 (HMSO, 1984).Google Scholar
Campbell, John, Margaret Thatcher: the iron lady (Jonathan Cape, 2003).Google Scholar
Campbell, Robert, ‘Introduction’, in Campbell, Robert, et al., eds., Academic and professional publishing (Chandos Publishing, 2012), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Cong, ‘The Chinese Academy of Sciences: the election of scientists into the elite group’, Minerva, 36 (1998), 323–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clark, Ronald W., Tizard (Methuen, 1965).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cockcroft, John, ‘Scientific collaboration in Europe’, New scientist, 24 January 1963, 170–2.Google Scholar
Collinge, John, ‘Lessons of kuru research: background to recent studies with some personal reflections’, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 363 (2008), 3689–96.Google ScholarPubMed
Collins, Peter, ‘The British Association as public apologist for science, 1919–1946’, in MacLeod, Roy and Collins, Peter, eds., The parliament of science (Science Reviews Ltd, 1981).Google Scholar
Collins, Peter, ‘Editorial’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S1–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, ‘Presidential politics: the controversial election of 1945’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 65 (2011), 325–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, ‘Realising our potential’, Science and public affairs (Summer 1993), 5–7.Google Scholar
Collins, Peter, ‘A role in running UK science?’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S119–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Peter, ‘A Royal Society for technology’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S43–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.M.D. and Bodmer, W.F., ‘The public understanding of science’, Studies in Science Education, 13 (1986), 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, P.M.D., Hicks, D.M. and Wyatt, S., Evaluation of national performance in basic research (ABRC Science Policy Studies No1, 1986).Google Scholar
Collins, P.M.D., et al., ‘Flows of researchers to and from the UK’, Nature, 328 (1987), 27–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connor, Steve, ‘Science and sanctions’, Nature, 320 (21 August 1986), 19–20.Google Scholar
COPUS, To know science is to love it? (Royal Society, 1998).Google Scholar
Cottrell, Alan, ‘Edward Neville da Costa Andrade, 1887–1971’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 18 (1972), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cottrell, Alan, ‘The rise and fall of science policy’, New scientist (14 October 1976), 80–2.Google Scholar
Cozzens, Susan E., ‘The discovery of growth: statistical glimpses of twentieth science’, in Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique, eds., Science in the twentieth century (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997), 127–42.Google Scholar
Crick, F.H.C. and Kendrew, J.C., et al., ‘International conferences’, Nature, 224 (4 October 1969), 93–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crowther, J.G., ‘The Royal Society’, New statesman and nation (2 December 1944), 375.Google Scholar
Dale, Henry, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 1 December 1941’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 179 (1942), 233–60.Google Scholar
Danckwerts, P.V., ‘Science versus technology: the battle for brains’, Nature, 200 (19 October 1963), 219–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darmon, Gérard, ‘European Science Foundation: towards a history’, in Krige, John and Guzzetti, Luca, eds., History of European scientific and technological cooperation (European Communities, 1997), 381–402.Google Scholar
Darwin, C.G., ‘The “reading” of papers at meetings of the Royal Society’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 2 (1939), 25–7.Google Scholar
Deverill, John J.P., ‘Scientific exchange with the USSR under the agreement between the Royal Society and the USSR Academy of Sciences’, in Sinclair, Craig, ed., The status of Soviet civil science (Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 1987), 255–77.Google Scholar
Dickson, David, ‘The Leonardo project’, Times higher education supplement (28 September 1984).Google Scholar
Dickson, David, ‘US cuts back on official exchanges with USSR’, Nature, 283 (7 February 1980), 513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doak Barnett, A., ‘Exchanges in the process of “normalisation”: an academic view’, in Keatley, Anne, ed., Reflections on scholarly exchanges with the People’s Republic of China, 1972–1976 (Committee on Scholarly Communication with the People’s Republic of China, 1978), 45–50.Google Scholar
Doel, Ronald E., ‘Scientists as policymakers, advisors, and intelligence agents: linking contemporary diplomatic history with the history of contemporary science’, in Söderqvist, Thomas, ed., The historiography of contemporary science and technology (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997).Google Scholar
Edgerton, David, ‘Science in the United Kingdom’, in Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique, eds., Science in the twentieth century (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997), 759–76.Google Scholar
Edgerton, David, ‘The White Heat revisited: the British government and technology in the 1960s’, Twentieth century British history, 7 (1996), 53–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
European Science Foundation, Voices of European science (ESF, 1994).Google Scholar
Ewen, Stanley, ‘Health risks of genetically modified foods’, Lancet, 354 (21 August 1999), 684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fan, Fa-ti. ‘Redrawing the map: science in twentieth-century China’, Isis, 98 (2007), 524–38.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feldberg, W.S., ‘Henry Hallett Dale, 1875–1968’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 16 (1970), 76–174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferry, Georgina, ‘The exception and the rule: women and the Royal Society 1945–2010’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S163–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferry, Georgina, ‘Fifty years of EMBO’, Nature, 511 (10 July 2014), 150–1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fishlock, David, ‘A trickle not a flood’, Financial Times (30 June 1987), 1 and 21.Google Scholar
Flather, Paul, ‘The missing generation’, Times Higher Education Supplement (24 September 1982), 8–9.Google Scholar
Florey, Howard, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1961’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 155 (1962), 307–20.Google Scholar
Florey, Howard, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1963’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 159 (1964), 393–404.Google ScholarPubMed
Florey, Howard, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1964’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 161 (1965), 439–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Florey, Howard, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1965’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 163 (1966), 425–34.Google Scholar
Flowers, Brian, The ESF – the first twenty years! (ESF, 20 November 1984).Google Scholar
Flynn, Laurie and Gillard, Michael, ‘Pro-GM food scientist “threatened editor”’, Guardian (1 November 1999).Google Scholar
Fogg, G.E., ‘The Royal Society and the Antarctic’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 54 (2000), 85–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fogg, G.E., ‘The Royal Society and the South Seas’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 55 (2001), 81–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foot, Rosemary, Trading with the enemy: the USA and the China trade embargo (Oxford University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
Gardner, John, ‘The Gang of Four and Chinese science’, Bulletin of the atomic scientists, 33 (September 1977), 24–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Hannah, The Silwood circle (Imperial College Press, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, Matthew, The Skylark rocket: British space science and the European Space Research Organisation 1957–1972 (Beauchesne, 2007).Google Scholar
Godwin, Matthew, Bulmer, Jane and Balmer, Brian, ‘The anatomy of the brain drain debate, 1950–1970s: witness seminar’, Contemporary British history, 23 (2009), 35–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodare, Jennifer, ‘Representing science in a divided world: the Royal Society and Cold War Britain’ (PhD thesis, University of Manchester, 2013).Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, Francis ed., Population – the complex reality (Royal Society, 1994).Google Scholar
Graham-Smith, Francis and Lovell, Bernard, ‘Diversions of a radio telescope’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 62 (2008), 197–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greenaway, Frank, Science international: a history of the International Council of Scientific Unions (CUP/ICSU, 1996).Google Scholar
Greenwood, J.W., ‘The scientist-diplomat: a new hybrid role in foreign affairs’, Science forum, 19 (1971), 14–8.Google Scholar
Gregory, Jane and Lock, Simon, ‘The evolution of “public understanding of science”: public engagement as a tool of science policy in the UK’, Sociology compass, 2 (2008), 1252–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummett, Philip, Scientists in Whitehall (Manchester University Press, 1980).Google Scholar
Gummett, Philip J. and Price, Geoffrey L., ‘An approach to the central planning of British science: the formation of the Advisory Council on Scientific Policy’, Minerva, 15 (1977), 119–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gummett, Philip and Williams, Roger, ‘Assessing the Council for Scientific Policy’, Nature, 240 (8 December 1972), 329–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haberer, Joseph, ‘Politicisation in science’, Science, 178 (17 November 1972), 713–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hailsham, Lord, The door wherein I went (Collins, 1975).Google Scholar
Hall, Marie Boas, All scientists now: the Royal Society in the nineteenth century (Cambridge University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Harris, Henry, ‘Howard Florey and the development of penicillin’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 53 (1999), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartley, Harold, ed., The tercentenary celebrations of the Royal Society of London (Royal Society, 1961).Google Scholar
Hemmen, George, ‘Royal Society expeditions in the second half of the twentieth century’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S89–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hennessy, Peter, Morrison, Susan and Townsend, Richard, Routine punctuated by orgies: the Central Policy Review Staff, 1970–83 (Strathclyde papers on government and politics No 31, 1984).Google Scholar
Higgins, Julia, ‘The Royal Society in Africa’, unpublished paper given at the conference ‘The Royal Society and science in the 20th century’, 22–23 April 2010.Google Scholar
Hill, A.V., ‘Age of election to the Royal Society’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 16 (1961), 151–3.Google Scholar
Hill, A.V., ‘Cancelled visit of British men of science to the Academy of Science of the USSR’, Nature, 155 (1945), 753.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hill, A.V., Memories and reflections (unpublished, 1971/72; copies at Royal Society and Churchill College, Cambridge).Google Scholar
Hill, A.V., ‘The needs of special subjects in the balanced development of science in the United Kingdom’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 4 (1946), 133–9.Google Scholar
Hinde, R.A. and Finney, J.L., ‘Joseph Rotblat, 1908–2005’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 53 (2007), 309–26.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, Cyril, ‘The Tercentenary Address at the formal opening ceremony, 19 July 1960’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 16 (1961), 13–24; also at Nature, 187 (23 July 1960), 274–8.Google Scholar
Hinshelwood, Cyril, ‘A visit to China’, New scientist, 6 (5 November 1959), 858–60.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1971’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 180 (1972), v–xx.Google ScholarPubMed
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1972’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 183 (1973), 1–19.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1973’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 185 (1974), v–xx.Google ScholarPubMed
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1974’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 188 (1975), 103–19.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 1 December 1975’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 192 (1976), 371–91.Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Alan, Chance and design: reminiscences of science in peace and war (Cambridge University Press, 1992).Google Scholar
Hodgkin, Alan, ‘Edgar Douglas Adrian, Baron Adrian of Cambridge’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 25 (1979), 1–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Home, R.W., ‘The Royal Society and the Empire: the colonial and Commonwealth Fellowship. Part I: 1731–1847’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 56 (2002), 307–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Home, R.W., ‘The Royal Society and the Empire: the colonial and Commonwealth Fellowship. Part II: after 1847’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 57 (2003), 47–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horlock, John, An open book (The Memoir Club, 2006).Google Scholar
Horrocks, Sally M.,‘The Royal Society, its Fellows and industrial R&D in the mid-century’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S31–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horton, Richard, ‘Health risks of genetically modified foods’, Lancet, 353 (29 May 1999), 1811.Google Scholar
House of Commons Select Committee on Science and Technology, Government funding of the learned scientific societies (fifth report of session 2001–2, HC 774–1 and HC 774-II).Google Scholar
House of Lords Select Committee on Science and Technology, Science and government (1981).Google Scholar
Huggins, William, The Royal Society, or science in the state and in the school (Methuen, 1906).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Jeff, ‘“Divine right” or democracy? The Royal Society “revolt” of 1935’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S101–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hughes, Jeff, ‘Introductory comments to final discussion session’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S173–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, Andrew, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1981’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 214 (1982), 137–52.Google ScholarPubMed
Huxley, Andrew, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1983’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 220 (1984), 383–98.Google Scholar
Huxley, Andrew, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1984’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 223 (1985), 403–16.Google Scholar
Huxley, Andrew, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1985’, Supplement to Royal Society News, (December 1985), i–vii.Google Scholar
Huxley, Andrew, ‘Nullius in verba’, Nature, 315 (23 May 1985), 272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
IAP, Statements 1993–2008 (IAP, 2008).Google Scholar
ICSU, ICSU and climate change: 1962–2006 and beyond (ICSU, 2006).Google Scholar
ICSU, ICSU and polar research: 1957–2007 and beyond (ICSU, 2006).Google Scholar
ICSU, ICSU and the universality of science: 1957–2006 and beyond (ICSU, 2006).Google Scholar
Irvine, John, Martin, Ben, et al., ‘Charting the decline in British science’, Nature, 316 (15 August 1985), 587–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Irwin, Alan and Wynne, Brian, eds., Misunderstanding science? (Cambridge Unviersity Preess, 1996).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
James, Frank and Quirke, Viviane, ‘L’affaire Andrade, or how not to modernise a traditional institution’, in James, Frank A.J.L., The common purposes of life: science and society at the Royal Institution of Great Britain (Ashgate, 2002), 273–304.Google Scholar
James, Simon, ‘The Central Policy Review Staff 1970–1983’, Political studies, 34 (1986), 423–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jellicoe, George, ‘Lord Edward Arthur Alexander Shackleton’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 45 (1961), 486–505.Google Scholar
Jones, Richard, ‘Introduction’, in Bennett, David and Jennings, Richard, eds., Successful science communication (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Jones, R.V. and Farren, W.S., ‘Henry Thomas Tizard’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 7 (1961), 313–48.Google Scholar
Joravsky, David, The Lysenko affair (Harvard University Press, 1970).Google Scholar
Jubb, Michael, ‘The scholarly ecosystem’, in Campbell, Robert, et al., eds., Academic and professional publishing (Chandos Publishing, 2012), 53–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, Victor S., Confronting communism: US and British policies towards China (University of Missouri Press, 2001).Google Scholar
Kenward, Michael, ‘Anglo-Soviet scientific exchanges frozen’, New scientist (28 February 1980), 637.Google Scholar
Klug, Aaron, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 29 November 1996’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 51 (1997), 121–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Aaron, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 1 December 1997’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 52 (1998), 181–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Aaron, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1998’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 53 (1999), 157–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Aaron, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1999’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 54 (2000), 99–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klug, Aaron, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2000’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 55 (2001), 165–77.Google Scholar
Krige, John, American hegemony and the postwar reconstruction of science in Europe (MIT Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krige, John, ‘The birth of EMBO and the difficult road to EMBL’, Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences, 33 (2002), 547–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krige, John, ‘The Ford Foundation, European physics and the Cold War’, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences, 29 (1999), 333–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krige, John, ‘The politics of European scientific collaboration’, in Krige, John and Pestre, Dominique, eds., Science in the twentieth century (Harwood Academic Publishers, 1997), 897–918.Google Scholar
Krige, John and Barth, Kai-Henrik, ‘Introduction: science, technology and international affairs’, Osiris, 21 (2006), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kubbinga, Henk, ‘European Physical Society (1968–2008): the early years’, Europhysics news, 39 (2008), 16–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lachmann, Peter, First steps: a personal account of the formation of the Academy of Medical Sciences (Academy of Medical Sciences, 2010).Google Scholar
Layton, David, Interpreters of science: a history of the Association for Science Education (John Murray/ASE, 1984).Google Scholar
Lock, Simon, ‘Deficits and dialogues: science communication and the public understanding of science in the UK’, in Bennett, David and Jennings, Richard, eds., Successful science communication (Cambridge University Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Loder, Natasha, ‘Royal Society: GM food hazard claim is “flawed”’, Nature, 399 (20 May 1999), 188.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovell, Bernard, ‘PMS Blackett’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 21 (1975), 1–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lovell, Bernard, ‘The Royal Society, the Royal Greenwich Observatory and the Astronomer Royal’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 48 (1994), 283–97.Google Scholar
Lyons, Henry, The record of the Royal Society of London (Royal Society, 1940).Google Scholar
Lyons, Henry, The Royal Society 1660–1940. A history of its administration under its charters (Cambridge University Press, 1944).Google Scholar
Macilwain, Colin, ‘In the best company’, Nature, 465 (24 June 2010), 1002–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacLeod, Roy M., ‘The Royal Society and the government grant: notes on the administration of scientific research, 1849–1914’, Historical Journal, 14 (1971), 323–58.Google Scholar
MacLeod, Roy, ‘The Royal Society and the Commonwealth: old friendships, new frontiers’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S137–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, Ben, Irvine, John, et al., ‘The continuing decline of British science’, Nature, 330 (12 November 1987), 123–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, David, ‘The Royal Society today’, Discovery, 21 (7 July 1960), 292–302.Google Scholar
Masood, Ehsan, ‘Cloning technique reveals legal loophole’, Nature, 385 (27 February 1997), 757.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Massey, Harrie and Robins, M.O., History of British space science (Cambridge University Press, 1986).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, Harrie and Thompson, Harold, ‘David Christie Martin’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 24 (1978), 391–407.Google Scholar
Matthews, Robert, ‘Now scientists must bridge the credibility gap’, Daily Telegraph (26 October 2000).Google Scholar
May, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2001’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 56 (2002), 121–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 29 November 2002’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 57 (2003), 117–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2004: Global problems and global science’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 59 (2005), 99–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
May, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2005: threats to tomorrow’s world’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 60 (2006), 109–30.Google Scholar
May, Robert, ‘Under-informed, over here’, Guardian (27 January 2005), 10.Google Scholar
May, Robert, The use of scientific advice in policy making (Office of Science and Technology, 1997).Google Scholar
McDonald, Alan, ‘Scientific cooperation as a bridge across the Cold War divide: the case of the International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 866 (1998), 55–83.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McGucken, William, ‘The Royal Society and the genesis of the Scientific Advisory Committee to Britain’s War Cabinet, 1939–1940’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 33 (1978), 87–115.Google Scholar
McGucken, William, Scientists, society and the state: the social relations of science movement in Great Britain, 1931–1947 (Ohio State University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Melville, Harry, The Department of Scientific and Industrial Research (George Allen and Unwin, 1962).Google Scholar
Miller, David Philip, ‘The usefulness of natural philosophy: the Royal Society and the culture of practical utility in the later eighteenth century’, British Journal for the History of Science, 32 (1999), 185–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morange, Michel, ‘EMBO and EMBL’, in Krige, John and Guzzetti, Luca, eds., History of European scientific and technological cooperation (European Communities, 1997), 77–92.Google Scholar
Morgan, Rose, The genome revolution (Greenwood Press, 2006).Google Scholar
Moszynski, Peter, ‘Royal Society warns of risks from depleted uranium’, BMJ, 326 (3 May 2003), 952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
National Academy of Engineering, The National Academy of Engineering: the first ten years (NAE, 1976).Google Scholar
van Noorden, Richard, ‘Royal Society sets out case for investment in research’, Nature, 464 (9 March 2010), 155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogston, A.G., ‘Harold Brewer Hartley’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 19 (1973), 348–73.Google Scholar
Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. and Hodge, M.J.S., Companion to the history of modern science (Routledge, 1990).Google Scholar
Oldham, Geoffrey, ‘Chinese science and the Cultural Revolution’, Technology review, 71 (October 1968), 23–9.Google Scholar
Oldroyd, David, Earth, water, ice and fire (Geological Society memoir 25, 2002).Google Scholar
Oriel, John, ‘Too many learned societies?’, New scientist (7 April 1960), 854–6.Google Scholar
van Oudenaren, John, Détente in Europe: the Soviet Union and the West since 1953 (Duke University Press, 1969).Google Scholar
Palca, Joseph, ‘South African exclusion causes academic schism’, Nature, 319 (13 February 1986), 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peyton, John, Solly Zuckerman: a scientist out of the ordinary (John Murray, 2001).Google Scholar
HRH The Prince Philip, ‘Promoting engineering’, Ingenia, 41 (December 2009), 12–6.Google Scholar
HRH The Prince Philip, ‘Research and prediction. The inaugural Hartley Lecture, 21 May 1974’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 29 (1974), 11–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, David, ‘A strategy for science in the UK’, Science and public policy, 15 (1988), 3–12.Google Scholar
Phillips, Lord, et al., ‘Lessons from the BSE Inquiry’, FST journal, 17 (July 2001), 3–8.Google Scholar
Porter, George, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting on 1 December 1986’, Science and public affairs, 2 (1987), 3–10.Google Scholar
Porter, George, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting on 30 November 1987’, Science and public affairs, 3 (1988), 3–12.Google Scholar
Porter, George, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting on 30 November 1990’, Science and public affairs, 6 (1991), 3–14.Google Scholar
Pounds, Ken, ‘The Royal Society’s formative role in UK space research’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S65–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Praagh, G., ‘Technology and the sixth-form boy’, Nature, 199 (7 September 1963), 958.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Derek de Solla, Little science, big science (Columbia University Press, 1963).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Price, Derek de Solla, ‘The world network of scientific attachés’, Science forum, 21 (1971), 34–5.Google Scholar
Raiffa, Howard, History of IIASA, talk given at IIASA, 23 September 1992 (transcript on IIASA website).Google Scholar
Rannestad, Andreas, NATO and science: an account of the NATO Science Committee 1958–1972 (NATO Scientific Affairs Division, 1973).Google Scholar
Rees, Martin, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2006’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 61 (2007), 75–83.Google Scholar
Rees, Martin, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 2010’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 65 (2011), 197–205.Google Scholar
Richardson, John, ‘Exchanges in the process of “normalisation”: US government perspective’, in Keatley, Anne, ed., Reflections on scholarly exchanges with the People’s Republic of China, 1972–1976 (Committee on Scholarly Communication with the People’s Republic of China, 1978), 43–5.Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1946’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 188 (1947), 143–60.Google Scholar
Robinson, Robert, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 1 December 1947’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 192 (1947), v–xix.Google Scholar
Rogers-Hayden, Tee and Pidgeon, Nick, ‘Moving engagement “upstream”? Nanotechnologies and the Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering’s inquiry’, Public Understanding of Science, 16 (2007), 345–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rose, Hilary and Rose, Steven, ‘Knowledge and power’, New scientist, 42 (17 April 1969), 108–9.Google Scholar
Rowlinson, John S. and Robinson, Norman H., The record of the Royal Society of London: supplement to the fourth edition for the years 1940–1989 (Royal Society, 1992).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Academies of sciences in the constituent republics of the former Soviet Union: a current appraisal (January 1992).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Annual report (bound into the Yearbook up to 1979, afterwards printed separately).Google Scholar
Royal Society, BSE and CJD – the facts to date (2 April 1996).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Climate change controversies: a simple guide (June 2007, updated December 2008).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Climate change: what we know and what we need to know (August 2002).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Corporate plan: a strategy for the Royal Society 1986–1996 (February 1986).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Corporate update and PES submission (June 1995).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Demographic trends and future university candidates (April 1983).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Disposal of radioactive wastes in deep repositories (November 1994).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The encouragement of scientific research in the United Kingdom (June 1960, published 1961).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Evidence to the Committee of Enquiry into the Organisation of Civil Science (Trend Committee) (submitted 1963).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The future of the Science Base (September 1992).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Genetically modified plants for food use (September 1998).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Genetically modified plants for food use and human health – an update (February 2002).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Grant-giving to universities for scientific research (March 1961).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The greenhouse effect: the scientific basis for policy (July 1989).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Guide to facts and fictions about climate change (March 2005).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The health hazards of depleted uranium munitions (Part I, May 2001; Part II, March 2002).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Infectious diseases in livestock (July 2002).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Royal Society, Into the new millennium: a corporate plan for 1997–2002 (May 1997).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Knowledge, networks and nations: global scientific collaboration in the 21st century (March 2011).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Memorandum by the Council on the consultative document (Cmnd 4814) ‘A framework for government research and development’ (February 1972).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The needs of research in fundamental science after the war (printed for private circulation, January 1945).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The public understanding of science (September 1985).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Report of the ad hoc Biological Research Committee (November 1961).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Reaping the benefits (October 2009).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Review of data on possible toxicity of GM potatoes (June 1999).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The Royal Society Commonwealth Bursaries Scheme, 1954 to 1978 (1979).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The Royal Society – the next 10 years (March 1990).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Science education 11–18 in England and Wales (November 1982).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Science in society: report (July 2004).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Science in society: the impact and legacy of the five year Kohn Foundation funded programme (September 2006).Google Scholar
Royal Society, The scientific century: securing our future prosperity (March 2010).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Submission to the Science and Technology Committee’s inquiry on women in STEM careers (September 2013).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Support of geophysics in the United Kingdom (June 1985).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Vision for science and mathematics education (June 2014).Google Scholar
Royal Society, Yearbook (published annually, starting 1897).Google Scholar
Royal Society and American Association for the Advancement of Science, New frontiers in science diplomacy (January 2010).Google Scholar
Royal Society and National Academy of Sciences, Climate change: evidence and causes (February 2014).Google Scholar
Royal Society and National Academy of Sciences, Population growth, resource consumption, and a sustainable world (February 1992).Google Scholar
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties (July 2004).Google Scholar
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, ‘Nanoscience and nanotechnologies: opportunities and uncertainties’: two-year review of progress on government actions (October 2006).Google Scholar
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, Nuclear energy – the future climate (June 1999).Google Scholar
Royal Society and Royal Academy of Engineering, The role of the Renewables Directive in meeting Kyoto targets (October 2000).Google Scholar
Royal Society et al., Global response to climate change (June 2005).Google Scholar
Royal Society et al., The science of climate change (May 2001).Google Scholar
Royal Society et al., Transgenic plants and world agriculture (July 2000).Google Scholar
Lord Sainsbury of Turville, The race to the top: a review of Government’s science and innovation policies (HMSO, 2007).Google Scholar
Salomon, Jean-Jacques, International scientific organisations (OECD, 1965).Google Scholar
Salomon, Jean-Jacques, ‘International scientific policy’, Minerva, 2 (1964), 411–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salomon, Jean-Jacques, Science and politics (Macmillan, 1973).Google Scholar
Schell, Orville, ‘China’s Andrei Sakharov’, Atlantic monthly (May 1988), 35–52.Google Scholar
Schilling, Warner R., ‘Science, technology, and foreign policy’, Journal of international affairs, 13 (1959), 7–18.Google Scholar
Schroeder-Gudehus, Brigitte, ‘Nationalism and internationalism’, in Olby, R.C., Cantor, G.N., Christie, J.R.R. and Hodge, M.J.S., eds., Companion to the history of modern science (Routledge, 1990), 909–19.Google Scholar
Schroeder-Gudehus, Brigitte, ‘Science, technology and foreign policy’, in Spiegel-Rösing, Ina and de Solla Price, Derek, eds., Science, technology and society (Sage Publications, 1977), 473–506.Google Scholar
SEPSU, An analysis of the Royal Society Research Grant Scheme (Royal Society, 1991).Google Scholar
SEPSU, European collaboration in science and technology: pointers to the future for policy makers (SEPSU Policy Study No 3, February 1989).Google Scholar
SEPSU, Guide to European collaboration in science and technology (December 1987; second edition, December 1990).Google Scholar
SEPSU, Migration of scientists and engineers to and from the UK (SEPSU Policy Study No 1: Royal Society, 1987).Google Scholar
SEPSU, Two reports on University Research Fellowships (Royal Society, 1993).Google Scholar
Sherrington, Charles, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1922’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 102 (1923), 373–88.Google Scholar
Sherrington, Charles, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1923’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 105 (1924), 1–16.Google Scholar
Sizer, John, ‘A critical examination of the events leading up to the UGC’s grant letters dated 1 July 1981’, Higher education, 18 (1989), 639–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, D.C., Collins, P.M.D., et al., ‘National performance in basic research’, Nature, 323 (1986), 681–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Kathlin, ‘The role of scientists in normalising US-China relations: 1965–1979’, Annals of the New York Academy Science, 866 (1998), 114–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snowden, Christopher, ‘Technological innovation in industry and the role of the Royal Society’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), S55–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Southwood, Richard, ‘Surface Waters Acidification Programme’, Science and public affairs, 5 (1990), 74–95.Google Scholar
Stanford Research Institute, Possible non-military scientific developments and their potential impact on foreign policy problems of the United States (Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, 1959).Google Scholar
Stevenson, Richard, ‘Acid rain: swapping fishermen’s tales’, Chemistry in Britain (May 1990), 397.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, C.E., ‘United States science offices abroad’, Nature, 166 (15 July 1950), 87–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Suttmeier, Richard P., ‘Scientific cooperation and conflict management in US-China relations from 1978 to the present’, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 866 (1998), 137–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synge, R.L.M. and Williams, E.F., ‘Albert Charles Chibnall’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 35 (1990), 57–96.Google Scholar
Thompson, Harold, ‘Cyril Norman Hinshelwood’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 19 (1973), 375–431.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thornton, H.G., ‘A note on the visit to Russia of the Royal Society delegation in 1956’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 12 (1957), 230–6.Google Scholar
Thring, M.W., ‘The efficient development of new ideas in industry’, Guardian, 26 November 1963.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexander, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1976’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and physical sciences, 352 (1977), 451–62.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexander, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1977’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 200 (1978), v–xiv.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexander, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1978’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 204 (1979), 1–14.Google ScholarPubMed
Todd, Alexander, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 30 November 1979’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 206 (1980), 369–80.Google ScholarPubMed
Todd, Alexander, ‘Address at the Anniversary Meeting, 1 December 1980’, Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences, 211 (1980), 1–13.Google Scholar
Todd, Alexander, A time to remember: the autobiography of a chemist (Cambridge University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
Todd, Alexander and Cornforth, J.W., ‘Robert Robinson’, Biographical memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society, 22 (1976), 415–527.Google Scholar
Tooze, John, ‘A brief history of EMBO’, in European Molecular Biology Organisation 1964–1989 (EMBO, 1989), 8–19.Google Scholar
Turney, Jon, ‘Science suffering says FRS survey’, Times higher education supplement (3 December 1982), 1.Google Scholar
Vig, Norman J., Science and technology in British politics (Pergamon Press, 1968).Google Scholar
Walgate, Robert, ‘China wants 800,000 scientists by 1985’, Nature, 274 (10 August 1978), 525.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Zuoyue, ‘Science and the state in modern China’, Isis, 98 (2007), 558–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, Zuoyue, ‘Transnational science during the Cold War: the case of Chinese/American scientists’, Isis, 101 (2010), 367–77.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, Zuoyue, ‘US-China scientific exchange: a case study of state-sponsored scientific internationalism during the Cold War and beyond’, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences, 30 (1999), 249–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, Bob, ‘The Royal Society and the debate on climate change’, in Bauer, M.W. and Bucchi, M., eds., Journalism, science and society: science communication between news and public relations (Routledge, 2007), 159–72.Google Scholar
Werskey, Gary, The visible college (Allen Lane, 1978).Google Scholar
Whitehead, J. Rennie, Memoirs of a boffin (published online, 1995).Google Scholar
Whyte, Neil and Gummett, Philip, ‘Far beyond the bounds of science: the making of the United Kingdom’s first space policy’, Minerva, 35 (1997), 139–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilkie, Tom, British science and politics since 1945 (Blackwell, 1991).Google Scholar
Williams, James H., ‘Fang Lizhi’s big bang: a physicist and the state in China’, Historical studies in the physical and biological sciences, 30 (1999), 49–87.Google Scholar
Williams, Roger, ‘Some political aspects of the Rothschild affair’, Science studies, 3 (1973), 31–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, Rowan, ‘A sermon … on the occasion of the 350th anniversary’, Notes and records of the Royal Society of London, 64 (2010), 213–5.Google Scholar
Williams, Ruth, ‘Sir John Gurdon: godfather of cloning’, Journal of cell biology, 181 (2008), 178–9.Google Scholar
Williams, Shirley, ‘The responsibility of science’, Times Saturday review (27 February 1971), 15.Google Scholar
Williams, Trevor I., Howard Florey: penicillin and after (Oxford University Press, 1984).Google Scholar
Williams, Trevor I., Robert Robinson, chemist extraordinary (Clarendon Press, 1990).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilmut, Ian, et al., ‘Viable offspring derived from fetal and adult mammalian cells’, Nature, 385 (27 February 1997), 810–3.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wynne, Brian, ‘Knowledges in context’, Science, technology and human values, 16 (1991), 111–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ziman, John, ‘The problem of Soviet scientists’, Nature, 246 (7 December 1973), 322–3.Google Scholar
Ziman, John, ‘Public understanding of science’, Science, technology and human values, 16 (1991), 99–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Collins
  • Book: The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248884.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Collins
  • Book: The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248884.014
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Peter Collins
  • Book: The Royal Society and the Promotion of Science since 1960
  • Online publication: 05 November 2015
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139248884.014
Available formats
×