Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-5wvtr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-23T09:40:56.102Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2012

Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Ronald Dworkin , pp. 169 - 176
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burley, Justine, ed. Dworkin and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University Press, 1989.CrossRef
Guest, Stephen. Ronald Dworkin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
Hunt, Alan, ed. Reading Dworkin Critically. New York and Oxford: Berg, 1992.
Hurley, Susan. Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Perry, Stephen. “Interpretation and Methodology in Legal Theory,” in Law and Interpretation, ed. Marmor, A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Posner, Richard A.Conceptions of Legal ‘Theory’: A Response to Ronald Dworkin.” Arizona State Law Journal 29 (1997): 377–88.Google Scholar
Raban, Ofer. “Dworkin's ‘Best Light’ Requirement and the Proper Methodology of Legal Theory.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003): 243–64.Google Scholar
Schlink, Bernhard. “Hercules in Germany?International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 610–20.Google Scholar
Westmoreland, Robert. “Dworkin and Legal Pragmatism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1991): 174–192.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Max. “Taking Dworkin Seriously.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (1983): 27–39.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. MTaking Ideology Seriously: Ronald Dworkin and the CLS Critique.” UMKC Law Review 55 (1987): 392–433.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C.Reconsidering Dworkin's Case for Judicial Activism.” Journal of Politics 46 (1984): 503–19.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C.Taking Dworkin Seriously.” The Review of Politics 47 (1985): 45–65.Google Scholar
Burton, Steven J.Ronald Dworkin and Legal Positivism.” Iowa Law Review 73 (1987): 109–29.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall, ed. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth, 1984.
Coleman, Jules. “Negative and Positive Positivism.” Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 139–64.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules, ed. Hart's Postscript. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Coleman, Jules, and Shapiro, Scott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 (various chapters).
Corlett, J. Angelo. “Dworkin's Empire Strikes Back!Statute Law Review 21 (2000): 43–56.Google Scholar
Culver, Keith. “Leaving the Hart-Dworkin Debate.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 51 (2001): 367–98.Google Scholar
Donato, James. “Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.” Stanford Law Review 40 (1988): 1517–41.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Herbert Hart and the Semantic Sting.” Legal Theory 4 (1998): 283–300.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Are There Any Rules?The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 199–219.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Raz on Gaps – The Suprising Part,” in Rights, Culture and Law, ed. Meyer, L. H, Paulson, S. L, and Pogge, T. W (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Galis, Leon. “The Real and Unrefuted Rights Thesis.” The Philosophical Review 92 (1983): 197–221.Google Scholar
Grafstein, Robert. “Taking Dworkin to Hart: A Positivist Conception of Institutional Rules.” Political Theory 11 (1983): 244–65.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L A. “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream,” in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Hart, H. L A. “Legal Duty and Obligation,” in Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
Hart, H. L A.Postscript” to The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 239–44.
Hershovitz, Scott. Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Waluchow's Defense of Inclusive Positivism.” Legal Theory 5 (1999): 101–16.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A.No Best Answer?University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146 (1998): 1599–1637.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H.Also Among the Prophets: Some Rejoinders to Ronald Dworkin's Attacks on Legal Positivism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal Thought 12 (1996): 53–82.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H.Law Without Trimmings: A Defense of Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kress, Ken, and Anderson, Scott W.. “Dworkin in Transition.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 37 (1989): 337–51.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Moral Aspects of Legal Theory.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1982): 223–54.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Principles, Positivism and Legal Theory.” Yale Law Journal 87 (1977): 415–35.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “Beyond the Hart–Dworkin Debate.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. Jr.Dworkin on Judicial Discretion: Comments.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 638–41.Google Scholar
MacCormick, D. NDworkin as Pre-Benthamite.” The Philosophical Review 87 (1978): 586–607.Google Scholar
Mackie, John. “The Third Theory of Law.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (1977): 3–16.Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne. “Dworkin and Apartheid,” in Law and Social Practice, ed. Corder, H. (Cape Town: Juta, 1988) 181.
Nino, Carlos S.Dworkin and Legal Positivism.” Mind 89 (1980): 519–43.Google Scholar
Pannick, David. “A Note on Dworkin and Precedent.” The Modern Law Review 43 (1980): 36–44.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Authority, Law and Morality,” in Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
Regan, Donald H.Glosses on Dworkin: Rights, Principles, and Policies.” Michigan Law Review 76 (1978): 1213–64.Google Scholar
Soper, E. Philip. “Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute.” Michigan Law Review 75 (1977): 473–519.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J.Strong Discretion.” The Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1983): 321–39.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J.Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Woodman, Gordon. “Dworkin's ‘Right Answer’ Thesis and the Frustration of Legislative Intent: A Case-Study on the Leasehold Reform Act.” The Modern Law Review 45 (1982): 121–38.Google Scholar
Woozley, A. DNo Right Answer.” The Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1979): 25–34.Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew. “Policy, Principle, and Incrementalism: Dworkin's Jurisprudence of Race.” The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 241–62.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Eerik. “Ronald Dworkin on Communities and Obligations: A Critical Comment.” Ratio Juris: An International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law 12 (1999): 108–15.Google Scholar
Mian, Emran. “The Value Of Community, Or How Burke Compromises Dworkin.” Legal Theory 9 (2003): 125–56.Google Scholar
Neal, P.Liberalism & Neutrality.” Polity 17 (1985): 664–84.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall P. “A Coup d'Etatin Law's Empire: Dworkin's Hercules Meets Atlas”. Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy 9 (1990): 95–113.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard. “Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism.” Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 2 (June 1998): 725–63.Google Scholar
Richardson, Genevra. “The Legal Regulation of Process,” in Administrative Law and Government Action, ed. Richardson, Genevra and Genn, Hazel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Circumstances of Integrity.” Legal Theory 3 (1997): 1–22.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin's Theory of Rights.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 301–7.Google Scholar
Winston, Kenneth I.Principles and Touchstones: The Dilemma of Dworkin's Liberalism.” Polity 19 (1986): 42–55.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. “Liberalism and Paternalism: A Critique of Ronald Dworkin.” The Review of Politics 56 (1994): 615–39.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. “The Egalitarian Liberalism of Ronald Dworkin,” in Liberalism at the Crossroads: An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Political Theory and Its Critics (2nd ed.), ed. Wolfe, Christopher (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003).
Anderson, Elizabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109, no. 2 (Jan. 1999): 287–337.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Chris. “Equality, Risk and Responsibility: Dworkin on the Insurance Market.” Economy and Society 34 (2005): 451–73.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 158–94.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Egalitarianism and Responsibility.” Journal of Ethics 3 (1999): 225–47.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Equal Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999): 488–97.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism.” Ethics 110 (2000): 339–49.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Luck and Equality II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol (2001): 73–90.Google Scholar
Bennett, John G.Ethics and Markets.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 195–204.Google Scholar
Champeau, Serge. “Ronald Dworkin, le Libéralisme et l'Égalité.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 97 (1999): 550–80.Google Scholar
Christian, Arnsperger. “Reformulating Equality of Resources.” Economics and Philosophy 13 (1997): 61–77.Google Scholar
Christofidis, Miriam Cohen. “Talent, Slavery and Envy in Dworkin's Equality of Resources.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 16 (2004): 267–87.Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, and Williams, Andrew, eds. The Ideal of Equality. New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press, 2000.
Clayton, Matthew. “Liberal Equality and Ethics.” Ethics 113 (2002): 8–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. AOn the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (1989): 906–44.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. “Professor Dworkin's External/Personal Preference Distinction.” Duke Law Journal (1983): 959–86.Google Scholar
Fleirbaey, Marc. “Equality of Resources Revisited.” Ethics 113 (2002): 82–105.Google Scholar
Halpin, Andrew. “Clamshells or Bedsteads?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000): 353–66.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. “Dworkin's Auction.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3 (2004): 313–35.Google Scholar
Hinton, Timothy. “Choice and Luck in Recent Egalitarian Thought.” Philosophical Papers 31 (2002): 145–67.Google Scholar
Hurley, Susan. Justice, Luck, and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Jacobson, Daniel. “Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1995): 64–79.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Langton, Rae. “Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women and Pornographers.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 311–59.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kaspar. “Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility.” Ethics 111 (2001): 548–79.Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin M.Liberal Neutrality Or Liberal Tolerance?Law and Philosophy 16 (1997): 529–59.Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin M.Liberalism, Justice and Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Matravers, Matt. “Responsibility, Luck, and the ‘Equality of What?’ Debate.” Political Studies 50 (2002): 558–72.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan. “On Dworkinian Equality.” Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1983): 1–23.Google Scholar
Nordahl, Richard. “Ronald Dworkin and the Defense of Homosexual Rights.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 8 (1995): 19–48.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. “Luck, Insurance, and Equality.” Ethics 113 (2002): 40–54.Google Scholar
Plaw, Avery. “Why Monist Critiques Feed Value Pluralism: Ronald Dworkin's Critique of Isaiah Berlin.” Social Theory and Practice 30 (2004): 105–26.Google Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. Equal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Rickard, Maurice. “Freedom, Equality, and the True Costs of Resources.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 37 (1998): 761–7.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. “Equality of Talent.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (1985): 151–88.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. “A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1993): 146–66.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Roemer, John. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Rogerson, Kenneth F.The Inequality of Markets.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 28 (1989): 553–67.Google Scholar
Sandbu, Martin E.On Dworkin's Brute-Luck-Option-Luck Distinction and the Consistency of Brute-Luck Egalitarianism.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3 (2004): 283–312.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. “What is Egalitarianism?Philosophy and Public Affairs 31, no. 1 (Winter 2003): 5–39.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. “Equality as the Virtue of Sovereigns: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2003): 199–206.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Emily. “How Liberal Is Liberal Equality? A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's Tanner Lecture.” Legal Theory 1 (1995): 227–50.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. “Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities.” Ethics 112 (2002): 529–57.Google Scholar
Veen, Robert. “Equality of Talent Resources: Procedures or Outcomes?Ethics 113 (2002): 55–81.Google Scholar
Varian, Hal R.Dworkin on Equality of Resources.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (1985): 110–25.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T. MAgainst Dworkin's Endorsement Constraint.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 15 (2003) 175–93.Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew. “Dworkin on Capability.” Ethics 113 (2002): 23–39.Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew. “Equality for the Ambitious.” Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002): 377–89.Google Scholar
Baird, Robert M.Dworkin, Abortion, Religious Liberty, and the Spirit of Enlightenment.” Journal of Church and State 37 (1995): 753–71.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda. “Rights, Intrinsic Values and the Politics of Abortion.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 11 (1999): 215–29.Google Scholar
Belshaw, C.Abortion, Value and the Sanctity of Life.” Bioethics 11 (1997): 130–50.Google Scholar
David, Gregory B.Dworkin, Precedent, Confidence, and Roe v. Wade.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (2004): 1221–53.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. MAbortion and the Value of Life. Ronald Dworkin: Life's DominionColumbia Law Review 95 (1995): 160–222.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. MRonald Dworkin on Abortion and Assisted Suicide.” The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 221–40.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David. “The Importance of Being Important: Euthanasia and Critical Interests in Dworkin's Life's Dominion.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 7 (1995): 301–14.Google Scholar
Naticchia, Chris. “Ronald Dworkin's Life's Dominion.” Journal of Law and Politics 10 (1997): 339–67.Google Scholar
O'Day, Ken. “Intrinsic Value and Investment.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 11 (1999): 194–214.Google Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. “Ronald Dworkin, Reverence for Life, and the Limits of State Power.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 13 (2001): 33–64.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. MPartisan for Life.” New York Review of Books (July 15, 1993), 40 (13): 45–50.Google Scholar
Stroud, Sarah. “Dworkin and Casey on Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 140–70.Google Scholar
Tomasi, John. “Liberalism, Sanctity, and the Prohibition of Abortion.” The Journal of Philosophy 94 (1997): 491–513.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Hilliard. “A Liberal Reading of the American Constitution.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal Thought 10 (1997): 521–35.Google Scholar
Chaskalson, Arthur. “From Wickedness to Equality: The Moral Transformation of South African Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 590–609.Google Scholar
Eisele, Thomas D.Taking Our Actual Constitution Seriously.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1799–1838.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. “Taking Law Seriously: Reflections on ‘Thinking Like a Lawyer.’Stanford Law Review 30, no. 5 (May 1978): 1071, 1090–1.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
McCaffery, Edward J.Ronald Dworkin, Inside-Out.” California Law Review85 (1997): 1043–86.Google Scholar
Neeley, G. Steven. “Dworkin, Vague Constitutional Clauses, and the Eighth Amendment's Admonition Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment.” Contemporary Philosophy 16 (1994): 18–27.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H.Dworkin's Two Conceptions of Rights.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 309–15.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.Dworkin, Polemics, and the Clinton Impeachment Controversy.” Northwestern University Law Review 94 (2000): 1023–47.Google Scholar
Sebok, Anthony. “Judging the Fugitive Slave Acts.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1835–1854.Google Scholar
Sebok, Anthony J.Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Zagrebelsky, Gustavo. “Ronald Dworkin's Principle Based Constitutionalism: An Italian Point of View.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 621–50.Google Scholar
Burley, Justine, ed. Dworkin and His Critics. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2004.
Fish, Stanley. Doing What Comes Naturally: Change, Rhetoric, and the Practice of Theory in Literary and Legal Studies. Durham: Duke University Press, 1989.CrossRef
Guest, Stephen. Ronald Dworkin. Stanford: Stanford University Press, 1991.
Hunt, Alan, ed. Reading Dworkin Critically. New York and Oxford: Berg, 1992.
Hurley, Susan. Natural Reasons: Personality and Polity. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Perry, Stephen. “Interpretation and Methodology in Legal Theory,” in Law and Interpretation, ed. Marmor, A. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
Posner, Richard A.Conceptions of Legal ‘Theory’: A Response to Ronald Dworkin.” Arizona State Law Journal 29 (1997): 377–88.Google Scholar
Raban, Ofer. “Dworkin's ‘Best Light’ Requirement and the Proper Methodology of Legal Theory.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 23 (2003): 243–64.Google Scholar
Schlink, Bernhard. “Hercules in Germany?International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 610–20.Google Scholar
Westmoreland, Robert. “Dworkin and Legal Pragmatism.” Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1991): 174–192.Google Scholar
Atkinson, Max. “Taking Dworkin Seriously.” Australasian Journal of Philosophy 61 (1983): 27–39.Google Scholar
Balkin, J. MTaking Ideology Seriously: Ronald Dworkin and the CLS Critique.” UMKC Law Review 55 (1987): 392–433.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C.Reconsidering Dworkin's Case for Judicial Activism.” Journal of Politics 46 (1984): 503–19.Google Scholar
Brubaker, Stanley C.Taking Dworkin Seriously.” The Review of Politics 47 (1985): 45–65.Google Scholar
Burton, Steven J.Ronald Dworkin and Legal Positivism.” Iowa Law Review 73 (1987): 109–29.Google Scholar
Cohen, Marshall, ed. Ronald Dworkin and Contemporary Jurisprudence. London: Duckworth, 1984.
Coleman, Jules. “Negative and Positive Positivism.” Journal of Legal Studies 11 (1982): 139–64.Google Scholar
Coleman, Jules, ed. Hart's Postscript. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Coleman, Jules. The Practice of Principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Coleman, Jules, and Shapiro, Scott, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001 (various chapters).
Corlett, J. Angelo. “Dworkin's Empire Strikes Back!Statute Law Review 21 (2000): 43–56.Google Scholar
Culver, Keith. “Leaving the Hart-Dworkin Debate.” The University of Toronto Law Journal 51 (2001): 367–98.Google Scholar
Donato, James. “Dworkin and Subjectivity in Legal Interpretation.” Stanford Law Review 40 (1988): 1517–41.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Herbert Hart and the Semantic Sting.” Legal Theory 4 (1998): 283–300.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Are There Any Rules?The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 199–219.Google Scholar
Endicott, Timothy. “Raz on Gaps – The Suprising Part,” in Rights, Culture and Law, ed. Meyer, L. H, Paulson, S. L, and Pogge, T. W (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).
Galis, Leon. “The Real and Unrefuted Rights Thesis.” The Philosophical Review 92 (1983): 197–221.Google Scholar
Grafstein, Robert. “Taking Dworkin to Hart: A Positivist Conception of Institutional Rules.” Political Theory 11 (1983): 244–65.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L A. “American Jurisprudence through English Eyes: The Nightmare and the Noble Dream,” in Essays in Jurisprudence and Philosophy (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1983).
Hart, H. L A. “Legal Duty and Obligation,” in Essays on Bentham (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1982).
Hart, H. L A.Postscript” to The Concept of Law, 2nd ed. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994), 239–44.
Hershovitz, Scott. Exploring Law's Empire: The Jurisprudence of Ronald Dworkin. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006.
Himma, Kenneth Einar. “Waluchow's Defense of Inclusive Positivism.” Legal Theory 5 (1999): 101–16.Google Scholar
Kornhauser, Lewis A.No Best Answer?University of Pennsylvania Law Review 146 (1998): 1599–1637.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H.Also Among the Prophets: Some Rejoinders to Ronald Dworkin's Attacks on Legal Positivism.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal Thought 12 (1996): 53–82.Google Scholar
Kramer, Matthew H.Law Without Trimmings: A Defense of Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Kress, Ken, and Anderson, Scott W.. “Dworkin in Transition.” The American Journal of Comparative Law 37 (1989): 337–51.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Moral Aspects of Legal Theory.” Midwest Studies in Philosophy 7 (1982): 223–54.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. “Principles, Positivism and Legal Theory.” Yale Law Journal 87 (1977): 415–35.Google Scholar
Leiter, Brian. “Beyond the Hart–Dworkin Debate.” American Journal of Jurisprudence 48 (2003): 17–51.Google Scholar
MacCallum, Gerald C. Jr.Dworkin on Judicial Discretion: Comments.” The Journal of Philosophy 60 (1963): 638–41.Google Scholar
MacCormick, D. NDworkin as Pre-Benthamite.” The Philosophical Review 87 (1978): 586–607.Google Scholar
Mackie, John. “The Third Theory of Law.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 7 (1977): 3–16.Google Scholar
Mureinik, Etienne. “Dworkin and Apartheid,” in Law and Social Practice, ed. Corder, H. (Cape Town: Juta, 1988) 181.
Nino, Carlos S.Dworkin and Legal Positivism.” Mind 89 (1980): 519–43.Google Scholar
Pannick, David. “A Note on Dworkin and Precedent.” The Modern Law Review 43 (1980): 36–44.Google Scholar
Raz, Joseph. “Authority, Law and Morality,” in Ethics in the Public Domain (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Raz, Joseph. The Authority of Law. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1979.
Regan, Donald H.Glosses on Dworkin: Rights, Principles, and Policies.” Michigan Law Review 76 (1978): 1213–64.Google Scholar
Soper, E. Philip. “Legal Theory and the Obligation of a Judge: The Hart/Dworkin Dispute.” Michigan Law Review 75 (1977): 473–519.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J.Strong Discretion.” The Philosophical Quarterly 33 (1983): 321–39.Google Scholar
Waluchow, Wilfrid J.Inclusive Legal Positivism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Woodman, Gordon. “Dworkin's ‘Right Answer’ Thesis and the Frustration of Legislative Intent: A Case-Study on the Leasehold Reform Act.” The Modern Law Review 45 (1982): 121–38.Google Scholar
Woozley, A. DNo Right Answer.” The Philosophical Quarterly 29 (1979): 25–34.Google Scholar
Altman, Andrew. “Policy, Principle, and Incrementalism: Dworkin's Jurisprudence of Race.” The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 241–62.Google Scholar
Lagerspetz, Eerik. “Ronald Dworkin on Communities and Obligations: A Critical Comment.” Ratio Juris: An International Journal of Jurisprudence and Philosophy of Law 12 (1999): 108–15.Google Scholar
Mian, Emran. “The Value Of Community, Or How Burke Compromises Dworkin.” Legal Theory 9 (2003): 125–56.Google Scholar
Neal, P.Liberalism & Neutrality.” Polity 17 (1985): 664–84.Google Scholar
Peerenboom, Randall P. “A Coup d'Etatin Law's Empire: Dworkin's Hercules Meets Atlas”. Law and Philosophy: An International Journal for Jurisprudence and Legal Philosophy 9 (1990): 95–113.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard. “Why Rights Are Not Trumps: Social Meanings, Expressive Harms, and Constitutionalism.” Journal of Legal Studies 27, no. 2 (June 1998): 725–63.Google Scholar
Richardson, Genevra. “The Legal Regulation of Process,” in Administrative Law and Government Action, ed. Richardson, Genevra and Genn, Hazel (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994).
Waldron, Jeremy. “The Circumstances of Integrity.” Legal Theory 3 (1997): 1–22.Google Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. “Pildes on Dworkin's Theory of Rights.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 301–7.Google Scholar
Winston, Kenneth I.Principles and Touchstones: The Dilemma of Dworkin's Liberalism.” Polity 19 (1986): 42–55.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. “Liberalism and Paternalism: A Critique of Ronald Dworkin.” The Review of Politics 56 (1994): 615–39.Google Scholar
Wolfe, Christopher. “The Egalitarian Liberalism of Ronald Dworkin,” in Liberalism at the Crossroads: An Introduction to Contemporary Liberal Political Theory and Its Critics (2nd ed.), ed. Wolfe, Christopher (Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2003).
Anderson, Elizabeth. “What Is the Point of Equality?Ethics 109, no. 2 (Jan. 1999): 287–337.Google Scholar
Armstrong, Chris. “Equality, Risk and Responsibility: Dworkin on the Insurance Market.” Economy and Society 34 (2005): 451–73.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophical Studies 56 (1989): 77–93.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Liberalism, Distributive Subjectivism, and Equal Opportunity for Welfare.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 158–94.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Egalitarianism and Responsibility.” Journal of Ethics 3 (1999): 225–47.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Equal Opportunity for Welfare Defended and Recanted.” Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (1999): 488–97.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Luck Egalitarianism and Prioritarianism.” Ethics 110 (2000): 339–49.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard. “Luck and Equality II.” Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, supp. vol (2001): 73–90.Google Scholar
Bennett, John G.Ethics and Markets.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14 (1985): 195–204.Google Scholar
Champeau, Serge. “Ronald Dworkin, le Libéralisme et l'Égalité.” Revue Philosophique de Louvain 97 (1999): 550–80.Google Scholar
Christian, Arnsperger. “Reformulating Equality of Resources.” Economics and Philosophy 13 (1997): 61–77.Google Scholar
Christofidis, Miriam Cohen. “Talent, Slavery and Envy in Dworkin's Equality of Resources.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 16 (2004): 267–87.Google Scholar
Clayton, Matthew, and Williams, Andrew, eds. The Ideal of Equality. New York: Macmillan and St. Martin's Press, 2000.
Clayton, Matthew. “Liberal Equality and Ethics.” Ethics 113 (2002): 8–22.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. AOn the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99 (1989): 906–44.Google Scholar
Ely, John Hart. “Professor Dworkin's External/Personal Preference Distinction.” Duke Law Journal (1983): 959–86.Google Scholar
Fleirbaey, Marc. “Equality of Resources Revisited.” Ethics 113 (2002): 82–105.Google Scholar
Halpin, Andrew. “Clamshells or Bedsteads?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 20 (2000): 353–66.Google Scholar
Heath, Joseph. “Dworkin's Auction.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3 (2004): 313–35.Google Scholar
Hinton, Timothy. “Choice and Luck in Recent Egalitarian Thought.” Philosophical Papers 31 (2002): 145–67.Google Scholar
Hurley, Susan. Justice, Luck, and Knowledge. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.
Jacobson, Daniel. “Freedom of Speech Acts? A Response to Langton.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 24 (1995): 64–79.Google Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. Contemporary Political Philosophy. New York: Oxford University Press, 1990.
Langton, Rae. “Whose Right? Ronald Dworkin, Women and Pornographers.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 19 (1990): 311–59.Google Scholar
Lippert-Rasmussen, Kaspar. “Egalitarianism, Option Luck, and Responsibility.” Ethics 111 (2001): 548–79.Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin M.Liberal Neutrality Or Liberal Tolerance?Law and Philosophy 16 (1997): 529–59.Google Scholar
Macleod, Colin M.Liberalism, Justice and Markets. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2000.
Matravers, Matt. “Responsibility, Luck, and the ‘Equality of What?’ Debate.” Political Studies 50 (2002): 558–72.Google Scholar
Narveson, Jan. “On Dworkinian Equality.” Social Philosophy and Policy 1 (1983): 1–23.Google Scholar
Nordahl, Richard. “Ronald Dworkin and the Defense of Homosexual Rights.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence 8 (1995): 19–48.Google Scholar
Otsuka, Michael. “Luck, Insurance, and Equality.” Ethics 113 (2002): 40–54.Google Scholar
Plaw, Avery. “Why Monist Critiques Feed Value Pluralism: Ronald Dworkin's Critique of Isaiah Berlin.” Social Theory and Practice 30 (2004): 105–26.Google Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. Equal Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.
Rickard, Maurice. “Freedom, Equality, and the True Costs of Resources.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 37 (1998): 761–7.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. “Equality of Talent.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (1985): 151–88.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. “A Pragmatic Theory of Responsibility for the Egalitarian Planner.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 10 (1993): 146–66.Google Scholar
Roemer, John. Theories of Distributive Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.
Roemer, John. Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1998.
Rogerson, Kenneth F.The Inequality of Markets.” Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review 28 (1989): 553–67.Google Scholar
Sandbu, Martin E.On Dworkin's Brute-Luck-Option-Luck Distinction and the Consistency of Brute-Luck Egalitarianism.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics 3 (2004): 283–312.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. “What is Egalitarianism?Philosophy and Public Affairs 31, no. 1 (Winter 2003): 5–39.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel. “Equality as the Virtue of Sovereigns: A Reply to Ronald Dworkin.” Philosophy & Public Affairs 31 (2003): 199–206.Google Scholar
Sherwin, Emily. “How Liberal Is Liberal Equality? A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's Tanner Lecture.” Legal Theory 1 (1995): 227–50.Google Scholar
Vallentyne, Peter. “Brute Luck, Option Luck, and Equality of Initial Opportunities.” Ethics 112 (2002): 529–57.Google Scholar
Veen, Robert. “Equality of Talent Resources: Procedures or Outcomes?Ethics 113 (2002): 55–81.Google Scholar
Varian, Hal R.Dworkin on Equality of Resources.” Economics and Philosophy 1 (1985): 110–25.Google Scholar
Wilkinson, T. MAgainst Dworkin's Endorsement Constraint.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 15 (2003) 175–93.Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew. “Dworkin on Capability.” Ethics 113 (2002): 23–39.Google Scholar
Williams, Andrew. “Equality for the Ambitious.” Philosophical Quarterly 52 (2002): 377–89.Google Scholar
Baird, Robert M.Dworkin, Abortion, Religious Liberty, and the Spirit of Enlightenment.” Journal of Church and State 37 (1995): 753–71.Google Scholar
Barclay, Linda. “Rights, Intrinsic Values and the Politics of Abortion.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 11 (1999): 215–29.Google Scholar
Belshaw, C.Abortion, Value and the Sanctity of Life.” Bioethics 11 (1997): 130–50.Google Scholar
David, Gregory B.Dworkin, Precedent, Confidence, and Roe v. Wade.” University of Pennsylvania Law Review 152 (2004): 1221–53.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. MAbortion and the Value of Life. Ronald Dworkin: Life's DominionColumbia Law Review 95 (1995): 160–222.Google Scholar
Kamm, F. MRonald Dworkin on Abortion and Assisted Suicide.” The Journal of Ethics 5 (2001): 221–40.Google Scholar
Mitchell, David. “The Importance of Being Important: Euthanasia and Critical Interests in Dworkin's Life's Dominion.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 7 (1995): 301–14.Google Scholar
Naticchia, Chris. “Ronald Dworkin's Life's Dominion.” Journal of Law and Politics 10 (1997): 339–67.Google Scholar
O'Day, Ken. “Intrinsic Value and Investment.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 11 (1999): 194–214.Google Scholar
Rakowski, Eric. “Ronald Dworkin, Reverence for Life, and the Limits of State Power.” Utilitas: A Journal of Utilitarian Studies 13 (2001): 33–64.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. MPartisan for Life.” New York Review of Books (July 15, 1993), 40 (13): 45–50.Google Scholar
Stroud, Sarah. “Dworkin and Casey on Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 25 (1996): 140–70.Google Scholar
Tomasi, John. “Liberalism, Sanctity, and the Prohibition of Abortion.” The Journal of Philosophy 94 (1997): 491–513.Google Scholar
Aronovitch, Hilliard. “A Liberal Reading of the American Constitution.” Canadian Journal of Law and Jurisprudence: An International Journal of Legal Thought 10 (1997): 521–35.Google Scholar
Chaskalson, Arthur. “From Wickedness to Equality: The Moral Transformation of South African Law.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 590–609.Google Scholar
Eisele, Thomas D.Taking Our Actual Constitution Seriously.” Michigan Law Review 95 (1997): 1799–1838.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. “Taking Law Seriously: Reflections on ‘Thinking Like a Lawyer.’Stanford Law Review 30, no. 5 (May 1978): 1071, 1090–1.Google Scholar
Levinson, Sanford. Constitutional Faith. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1988.
McCaffery, Edward J.Ronald Dworkin, Inside-Out.” California Law Review85 (1997): 1043–86.Google Scholar
Neeley, G. Steven. “Dworkin, Vague Constitutional Clauses, and the Eighth Amendment's Admonition Against Cruel and Unusual Punishment.” Contemporary Philosophy 16 (1994): 18–27.Google Scholar
Pildes, Richard H.Dworkin's Two Conceptions of Rights.” The Journal of Legal Studies 29 (2000): 309–15.Google Scholar
Posner, Richard A.Dworkin, Polemics, and the Clinton Impeachment Controversy.” Northwestern University Law Review 94 (2000): 1023–47.Google Scholar
Sebok, Anthony. “Judging the Fugitive Slave Acts.” Yale Law Journal 100 (1991): 1835–1854.Google Scholar
Sebok, Anthony J.Legal Positivism in American Jurisprudence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
Zagrebelsky, Gustavo. “Ronald Dworkin's Principle Based Constitutionalism: An Italian Point of View.” International Journal of Constitutional Law 1 (2003): 621–50.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Arthur Ripstein
  • Book: Ronald Dworkin
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167109.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Arthur Ripstein
  • Book: Ronald Dworkin
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167109.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Arthur Ripstein
  • Book: Ronald Dworkin
  • Online publication: 05 June 2012
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139167109.007
Available formats
×