Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-99c86f546-n7x5d Total loading time: 1.1 Render date: 2021-12-09T12:09:22.736Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

9 - The Paradoxes of Democracy and the Rule of Law

from Political Regulation, Governance, and Societal Transformations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2018

Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rethinking Society for the 21st Century
Report of the International Panel on Social Progress
, pp. 373 - 410
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdolian, L.F., and Takooshian., H 2002. “The USA Patriot Act: Civil Liberties, the Media, and Public Opinion.” Fordham Urban Law Journal 30/4: 14291453.Google Scholar
Acemoglu, D., and Robinson., J.A. 2012. Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity and Poverty. New York: Crown.Google Scholar
Agamben, G. 2005. State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agamben, G., and Raulff., U. 2004. “Interview with Giorgio Agamben – Life, a Work of Art Without an Author: The State of Exception, the Administration of Disorder and Private Life.” German Law Journal. www.germanlawjournal.com/article.php.Google Scholar
Alesina, A., and Spolaore., E. 2003. The Size of Nations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, B. 1996. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origins and Spread of Nationalism. Revised edition. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Arnone, M., and Borlini., L.S 2014. Corruption: Economic Analysis and International Law. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arrow, K. 1972. “Gifts and Exchanges.” Philosophy and Public Affairs I/4: 343362.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, G. 2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, G., and Ganuza., E. 2012. “No Parties, No Banners: The Spanish Experiment with Direct Democracy.” Boston Review, January.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, G., and Ganuza., E. 2016. Popular Democracy and the Paradoxes of Participation. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Baiocchi, G., Heller, P, and Silva., M. 2011. Bootstrapping Democracy: Transforming Local Governance and Civil Society in Brazil. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Bakardjieva, M. 2005. Internet Society: The Internet in Everyday Life. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Banfield, E.C. 1975. “Corruption as a Feature of Governmental Organization.” Journal of Law and Economics 18: 587605.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S. 2005. Restructuring Europe: Centre Formation, System Building, and Political Structuring Between the Nation State and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartolini, S., and Mair, P.. 1990. Identity, Competition, and Electoral Availability: The Stabilization of European Electorates 1885–1985. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baumann, S. 2000. Liquid Modernity. Cambridge: Polity.Google Scholar
Beck, U. 1992. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Bendix, R. 1964. Nation Building and Citizenship. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Benhabib, S. 2005. “Borders, Boundaries, and Citizenship.” PSOnline, October, 673677.Google Scholar
Bellamy, R. 2007. Political Constitutionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benkler, Y. 2006. The Wealth of Networks: How Social Production Transforms Markets and Freedom. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Bertrand, J., and Laliberté, A. (eds.). 2010. Multination States in Asia: Accommodation of Resistance? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bingham, L.B., Nabatchi, T., and O’Leary, R.. 2005. “The New Governance: Practices and Processes for Stakeholder and Citizen Participation in the Work of Government.” Public Administration Review 65/5: 547558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boltanski, L., and Chiapello, E.. 2006. The New Spirit of Capitalism. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Bork, R.H. 1993 (1978). The Antitrust Paradox: A Policy at War with Itself. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bosch, T. 2017. “Twitter Activism and Youth in South Africa: The Case of #RhodesMustFall.” Information, Communication & Society 20/2: 221232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bristow, G. 2010. Critical Reflections on Regional Competitiveness. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Brown, W. 2010. “We Are All Democrats Now ...Theory & Event 13/2: 4457.Google Scholar
Brown, W. 2015. Undoing The Demos: Neoliberalism’s Stealth Revolution. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Butler, J. 2009. “Performativity, Precarity and Sexual Politics.” AIBR. Revista de Antropología Iberoamericana 4/3: ixiii.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Castañeda, J. 1993. Utopia Unarmed: The Latin American Left After the Cold War. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Castells, M. 2015. Networks of Outrage and Hope: Social Movements in the Internet Age. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Cleaver, F. 1999. “Paradoxes of Participation: Questioning Participatory Approaches to Development.” Journal of International Development 11/4: 597612.3.0.CO;2-Q>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cole, D. 2003. Enemy Aliens: Double Standards and Constitutional Freedoms in the War on Terror. New York: The New Press.Google Scholar
Coleman, E.G. 2011. Anonymous: From the Lulz to Collective Action. In Politics in the Age of Secrecy and Transparency. http://mediacommons.futureofthebook.org/tne/pieces/anonymous-lulz-collective-action.Google Scholar
Coleman, G. 2012. “Our Weirdness Is Free.” Triple Canopy 15: 13.Google Scholar
Connelly, J. 2007. “The Relative Universality of Human Rights.” Human Rights Quarterly 29: 281306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Connelly, J. 2008. “Human Rights: Both Universal and Relative (A Reply to Michael Goodhart).” Human Rights Quarterly 30: 194204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cornell, S., and Hartmann, D.. 2007. Ethnicity and Race: Making Identities in a Changing World. Newbury Park, CA: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2003. Postdemocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2004. Postdemocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2011. The Strange Non-Death of Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2015. “Can There Be a Normative Theory of Corporate Political Power?” in Schneider, V. and Eberlein, B. (eds.), Complex Democracy: Varieties, Crises, and Transformations. Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2016a. “The Paradoxes of Privatisation and Public Service Outsourcing,” in Jacobs, M and Mazzucato, M. (eds.), Rethinking Capitalism: Economics and Policy for Sustainable and Inclusive Growth. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crouch, C. 2016b. Society and Social Change in 21st Century Europe. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crouch, C., Le Galès, P., Trigilia, C., and Voelzkow, H.. 2001. Local Production Systems in Europe. Rise or Demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dagnino, E., Olvera, A. and Panficci, A. (eds.). 2006. La disputa por la construcción democrática en América Latina. Mexico City: Fondo de Cultura Económica.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. 1961. Who Governs?: Democracy and Power in an American City. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. 1971. Polyarchy, Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R.A. 1982. Dilemmas of Pluralist Democracy: Autonomy Versus Control. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahlberg, L. 2001. “The Internet and Democratic Discourse.” Information, Communication & Society 4/4: 615633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalton, R.J., and Wattenberg, M.P (eds.). 2000. Parties Without Partisans: Political Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. 2013. Can Democracy Be Saved? Cambridge:Polity Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. 2014. Mobilizing for Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D. 2015a. Late Neoliberalism and Its Discontents in the Economic Crisis. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. 2015b. Social Movements in Times of Austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. 2017a. Global Diffusion of Protest. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D. (ed.). 2017b. Riding the Wave. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D. et al. 2017. Late Neoliberalism and its Discontent. Basingstoke: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
della Porta, D., Fernandez, J., Kouki, H., and Mosca, L. (eds.). 2017 in press. Movement Parties in Times of (Anti)austerity. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
della Porta, D., Font, J. and Sintomer, Y.. 2014. Participatory Democracy in Southern Europe: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences. New York: Rowman & Littlefield International.Google Scholar
della Porta, D., and Vannucci., A. 1999. Corrupt Exchanges. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
della Porta, D., and Vannucci., A 2012. The Hidden Order of Corruption. Farnham: Ashgate.Google Scholar
Deutsch, K.W. 1972. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Diamond, L.J. 1990. “Three Paradoxes of Democracy.” Journal of Democracy 1/3: 4860.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Douzinas, C. 2000. The End of Human Rights. London:Hart.Google Scholar
Douzinas, C. 2007. Human Rights and Empire: The Political Philosophy of Cosmopolitanism. London:Routledge.Google Scholar
Durkheim, E. 1964. The Division of Labour in Society, New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dutton, W.H., and Peltu, M.. 2007. Reconfiguring Government–Public Engagements: Enhancing the Communicative Power of Citizens. https://ssrn.com/abstract=1295337Google Scholar
Eddy, E.C. 2005. “Privatizing the Patriot Act: The Criminalization of Environmental and Animal Protectionists as Terrorists.” Pace Environmental Law Review 22/2: 261327.Google Scholar
Ericson, R.V. 1994. “The Royal Commission on Criminal Justice System Surveillance,” in McConville, M. and Bridges, L. (eds.), Criminal Justice in Crisis. Aldershot, UK: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Ezrahi, Y. 1990. The Descent of Icarus: Science and the Transformation of Contemporary Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Felt, U., Miller, C., Smith-Doerr, L., and Fouché, R. (eds.). 2016. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, J. 1990. The Anti-Politics Machine: Development, Depoliticization, and Bureaucratic Power in Lesotho. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ferguson, Y.H., and Mansbach, R.W. 1996. Polities: Authority, Identities, and Change. Columbia, SC: University of South Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Ferrara, A. 2003. “Two Notions of Humanity and the Judgement Argument for Human Rights.” Political Theory 31/3: 392420.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Font, J., della Porta, D., and Sintomer, Y. 2014. Participatory Democracy in Southern Europe: Causes, Characteristics and Consequences London: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Foucault, M. 1980. Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings, 1972–1977 (trans. Colin Gordon et al.). New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Fuchs, C. 2014. “Hacktivism and Contemporary Politics,” in Trottier, D. and Fuchs, C. (eds.) Social Media, Politics and the State: Protests, Revolutions, Riots, Crime and Policing in the Age of Facebook, Twitter and Youtube. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Fung, A. 2015. “Putting the Public Back Into Governance: The Challenges Of Citizen Participation And Its Future.” Public Administration Review 75/4: 513522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghai, Y., and Woodman, S (eds.). 2013. Practicing Self-Government: A Comparative Study of Autonomous Regions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., and Trow, M.. 1994. The New Production of Knowledge. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Gilens, M. 2012. Affluence and Influence: Economic Inequality and Political Power in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gladwell, M. 2010. “Small Change.” The New Yorker 4: 4249.Google Scholar
Godwin, M.L. 2014. “Civic Engagement and Fiscal Stress in American Cities: Insights From The Great Recession.” State and Local Government Review 46/4: 249259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goode, L. 2009. “Social News, Citizen Journalism and Democracy.” New Media & Society 11/8: 12871305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodhart, M. 2008. “Neither Relative nor Universal: A Response to Donnelly.” Human Rights Quarterly 30/1: 183193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gott, G. 2002. “Imperial Humanitarianism: History of an Arrested Dialectic,” in Hernández-Truyol, B.E. (ed.), Moral Imperialism: A Critical Anthology. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Gottfried, J., and Shearer, E.. 2016. News Use Across Social Media Platforms 2016. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.Google Scholar
Gupta, S., Davoodi, H.R., and Alonso-Terme, R.. 1998. “Does Corruption Affect Income Inequality and Poverty?” IMF Working Paper 76/98: 141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, P.M. 1990. Saving the Mediterranean: The Politics of International Environmental Cooperation. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1970. Toward a Rational Society: Student Protest, Science, and Politics. Boston, MA: Beacon.Google Scholar
Habermas, J. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contribution to a Discursive Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. 1993. Political Theory and the Modern State. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Heller, P. 2001. “Moving the State: The Politics of Democratic Decentralization in Kerala, South Africa, and Porto Alegre.” Politics and Society 29/1: 131163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hicken, A., and Kuhonta, E.M. (eds.). 2015. Party System Institutionalization in Asia: Democracies, Autocracies, and the Shadows of the Past. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hickey, S., and Mohan, G. (eds.). 2004. Participation: From Tyranny to Transformation? Exploring New Approaches to Participation in Development. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Hindman, M. 2008. The Myth Of Digital Democracy. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschl, R. 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Isin, E.F. 2008. “Theorizing Acts of Citizenship,” in Isin, E.F. and Nielsen, G.M. (eds.), Acts of Citizenship, London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
Isin, E.F. 2009. “Citizenship in Flux: The Figure of the Activist Citizen.” Subjectivity 29: 367388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ivanov, K.S. 2007. The Limits of a Global Campaign against Corruption, in Corruption and Development The Anti-Corruption Campaigns (Bracking, S., ed.). Basingstoke: Palgrave.Google Scholar
Jasanoff, S. (ed.). 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-Production of Science and Social Order. Abingdon: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jasanoff, S. 2005. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnston, M. 1986. “Corruption and Democracy in America,” in McKimey, J.B and Johnston, M. (eds.), Trend, Waste and Abuse in Government. Philadelphia, PA: ISHI Publications.Google Scholar
Johnston, M. 1996. “The Search for Definitions: The Vitality of Politics and the Issue of Corruption.International Social Science Journal 149: 321336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, S. (ed.). 1998. Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting Computer-Mediated Community and Technology (Vol. 2). London: Sage.Google Scholar
Joppke, C. 2010. “The Inevitable Lightening of Citizenship.” European Journal of Sociology 51/1: 932.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katz, R.S., and Mair, P.. 1995. “Changing Models of Party Organization and Party Democracy: The Emergence of the Cartel Party.” Party Politics 1/1: 531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. 2001. Plurinational Democracy: Stateless Nations in a Post-Sovereignty Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, M. 2013. Rescaling the European State: The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelemen, D. 2011. The Rise of Eurolegalism: The Transformation of Law and Governance in Europe. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelly Garrett, R. 2006. “Protest in an Information Society: A Review of Literature on Social Movements and New ICTs.” Information, Communication & Society 9/2: 202224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kellner, D. 2007. “Bushspeak and the Politics of Lying: Presidential Rhetoric in the ‘War On Terror’.” Presidential Studies Quarterly 37/4: 622645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kitschelt, H., and Wilkinson, S.I. (eds.). 2007. Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2008. Education for Inclusive Citizenship. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2010. “Highly Skilled Guest-Workers in the UK.” Policy and Society 29/4: 333343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2013. “Introduction,” in Kiwan, D. (ed.), Naturalization Policies, Education and Citizenship: Multicultural and Multination Societies in International Perspective. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2014. “Emerging Forms of Citizenship in the Arab World,” in Isin, E.F. and Nyers, P. (eds.), Routledge Global Handbook of Citizenship Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2016a. “Syrian and Syrian Palestinian Women in Lebanon: ‘Actors of Citizenship’?” in Shalaby, M. and Moghadam, V. (eds.), Empowering Women After the Arab Spring. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kiwan, D. 2016b. “Race, Ethnicity and Citizenship in Education: Locating Intersectionality and Migration for Social Justice,” in Peterson, A., Hattam, R., Zembylas, M., and Arthur, J. (eds.), The Palgrave International Handbook of Education for Citizenship and Social Justice. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klitgaard, R. 1988. Controlling Corruption. Berkeley, CA and Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Kocka, J. 2014. Geschichte des Kapitalismus. Munich: C.H. Beck Verlag.Google Scholar
Kriesi, H. et al. (eds.). 2012. Political Conflicts in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship: A Liberal Theory of Minority Rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. 2005. On Populist Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Latour, B. 1987. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Leal, P. 2007. “Participation: The Ascendancy of a Buzzword in the Neoliberal Era.” Development in Practice 17/4–5: 539548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, C.W. 2015. Do-It-Yourself. Democracy: The Rise of the Public Engagement Industry. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lee, C.W., Mcquarrie, M., and Walker, E.T.. 2015. Democratizing Inequalities: Dilemmas of the New Public Participation. New York: New York University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leighninger, M. 2006. The Next Form of Democracy: How Expert Rule Is Giving Way to Shared Governance – and Why Politics Will Never Be the Same. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Li, T.M. 2005. “Beyond ‘the State’ and Failed Schemes.” American Anthropologist 107/3: 383394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, C.E. 1977. Politics and Markets. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, S.M., and Rokkan, S. 1967. “Cleavage Structures, Party Systems and Voter Alignments,” in Lipset, S.M. and Rokkan, S., Party Systems and Voter Alignments. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Loader, I. 2000. “Plural Policing and Democratic Governance.” Social and Legal Studies 9/3: 323345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loader, I., and Walker, N.. 2007. Civilizing Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loughlin, M. 1992. Public Law and Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Lupu, N. 2016. Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand Dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAdam, D., Tarrow, S., and Tilly, C. 2001. Dynamics of Contention. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrid, R.L. 2012. The Rise of Ethnic Politics in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, S., and Zoco, E.. 2007. “Political Sequences and the Stabilization of Interparty Competition: Electoral Volatility in Old and New Democracies.” Party Politics 13/2: 155178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mair, P. 2013. Ruling the Void: The Hollowing of Western Democracy. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Mann, M. 1993. The Sources of Social Power, Volume II: The Rise of Classes and Nation-States, 1760–1914. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansuri, G., and Vijayendra, R.. 2013. Localizing Development: Does Participation Work? Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
Marshall, T.H. 1992. Citizenship and Social Class. London: Pluto.Google Scholar
Mauro, P. 1998. “Corruption and the Composition of Government Expenditure.” Journal of Public Economics 69: 263279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merkel, W. 2014. “Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy?Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 8/2: 109128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D. 2002. “Group Rights, Human Rights and Citizenship.” European Journal of Philosophy 10/2: 178195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morgan, J. 2011. Bankrupt Representation and Party System Collapse. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Moyn, S. 2010. The Last Utopia: Human Rights in History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Müller, J.-W. 2016. What Is Populism? Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nash, C. 2009. “Between Citizenship and Human Rights.” Sociology 43/6: 10671083.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nyers, P. 2010. “No-One Is Illegal: Between City and Nation.” Studies in Social Justice 4/2: 127143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
OECD. 2011. Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. London: OECD.
Offe, C. 1985. “New Social Movements: Changing Boundaries of the Political.” Social Research 52: 817868.Google Scholar
Ohmae, K. 1995. The End of the Nation State: The Rise of Regional Economies. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Olson, M. 1965. The Theory of Collective Action. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Pacquet, M. 2012. “Beyond Appearance: Citizenship Tests in Canada and the UK.” International Migration and Integration 13: 243260.Google Scholar
Peck, J., and Theodore, N.. 2010. “Mobilizing Policy: Models, Methods, and Mutations.” Geoforum 41/2: 169174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pellegata, A. 2013. “Constraining Political Corruption: An Empirical Analysis of the Impact of Democracy.” Democratization 20/7: 11951218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, A. 2012. “Legitimacy and the Swedish Security Service’s Attempts to Mobilize Muslim Communities.” International Journal of Criminology and Sociology 1/1: 112.Google Scholar
Peterson, A., and Wahlström, M. 2015. “Repression: The Governance of Domestic Dissent,” in della Porta, D. and Diani, M. (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Piketty, T. 2013. Le capital au 21e siècle. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.Google Scholar
Pizzorno, A. 1998. Il potere dei giudici. Stato democratico e controllo della virtu. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Polany, K. 1957. The Great Transformation. London: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
Posner, R.A. 2001. Antitrust Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rae, H. 2002. State Identities and the Homogenization of Peoples. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, V., and Sanyal, P.. 2010. “Dignity Through Discourse: Poverty and the Culture of Deliberation in Indian Village Democracies.” Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science 629/1: 146172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riedl, R.B. 2014. Authoritarian Origins of Democratic Party Systems in Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K.M. 2014. Changing Course in Latin America: Party Systems in the Neoliberal Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, K. 2015. Changing Course. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rokkan, S. 1999. State Formation, Nation-Building and Mass Politics in Europe. The Theory of Stein Rokkan, edited by Flora, P, Kuhnle, S, and Urwin, D. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Root, A. 2007. Market Citizenship: Experiments in Democracy and Globalization. London: Sage.Google Scholar
Rosanvallon, P. 2006. La contre-démocratie: La politique a l’age de la defiance. Paris: Seuil.Google Scholar
Rose, N. 1996. “The Death of the Social? Re-Figuring the Territory of Government.” International Journal of Human Resource Management 25/3: 327356.Google Scholar
Rose Ackerman, S. 1999. Corruption and Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rupnik, J. 2012. “How Things Went Wrong.” Journal of Democracy 23/3: 132137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sassen, S. 2000. World Cities in a Global Economy. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Sassen, S. 2008. Territory, Authority, Rights. From Medieval to Global Assemblages, updated edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Savage, C., and Shane, S.. 2016. “U.S. Reveals Death Toll From Airstrikes Outside War Zones.” New York Times, July 1.Google Scholar
Schattschneider, E.E. 1942. Party Government. New York: Rinehart.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P.C. 2001. “Parties Are Not What They Once Were,” in Diamond, L. and Gunther, R. (eds.), Political Parties and Democracy. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, A. 1998. Regions and the World Economy. The Coming Shape of Global Production, Competition, and Political Order. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Scott, A., Agnew, J., Soja, E., and Storper, M.. 2001. “Global City-Regions,” in Scott, A. (ed.), Global City-Regions. Trends, Theory, Policy, Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, A., and Hirschl, R. 2014. “On Citizenship, States and Markets.” Journal of Political Philosophy 22/2: 231257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shafir, G. 1998. “Introduction,” in Shafir, G. (ed.), The Citizenship Debates. Minneapolis, MN: Minnesota University Press.Google Scholar
Silva, E. 2009. Challenging Neoliberalism in Latin America. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, A.D. 1983. State and Nation in the Third World. London: Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Smith, A.D. 1998. Nationalism and Modernism: A Critical Survey of Recent Theories of Nations and Nationalism. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soysal, Y. 1994. Limits of Citizenship: Migrants and Postnational Membership in Europe. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Standing, G. 2011. The Precariat: the New Dangerous Class. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
Stojanović, N. 2010. “Mononational and Multinational States: A Valid Dichotomy?” Paper for Conference on Legal Reasoning and European Law: The Perspective of Neil MacCormick, European University Institute, May 21, 2010.
Stokes, S.C., Dunning, T., Nazareno, M., and Brusco, V. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Streck, J.M. 1998. “Pulling the Plug on Electronic Town Meetings: Participatory Democracy and the Reality of the Usenet,” in Toulouse, C. and Luke, T.W. (eds.), The Politics of Cyberspace. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 2013. Buying Time: The Delayed Crisis of Democratic Capitalism. Verso.Google Scholar
Streeck, W. 2015. “Comment on Wolfgang Merkel, ‘Is Capitalism Compatible with Democracy?’” Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft 9/1: 4960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Su, C. 2017. “Beyond Inclusion: Critical Race Theory and Participatory Budgeting.” New Political Science 39/1: 126142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talpin, J. 2012. Schools of Democracy: How Ordinary Citizens (Sometimes) Become Competent in Participatory Budgeting Institutions. Colchester: ECPR Press.Google Scholar
Tierney, S. 2006. Constitutional Law and National Pluralism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Uslaner, E.M. 2013. “Trust and Corruption Revisited: How and Why Trust and Corruption Shape Each Other.” Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology 47/6: 36033608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Supreme Court. 2010. Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, 08–205. Washington, DC: US Supreme Court.
US Supreme Court. 2014. McCutcheon v. Federal Election Commission, 12–536. Washington, DC: US Supreme Court.
Van Cott, D.L. 2009. Radical Democracy in the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
van den Berghe, P. 2006. “Ethnies and Nations: Genealogy Indeed,” in Ichijo, A. and Uzelac, G. (eds.), When Is the Nation? Towards an Understanding of Theories of Nationalism. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Welikala, A. 2015. “Southphalia or Southfailure? National Pluralism and the State in South Asia,” in Tierney, S. (ed.), Nationalism and Globalization. Oxford: Hart.Google Scholar
Whitehead, L. 2002. Democratization: Theory and Experience. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, J. 2011. Oligarchy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, S. (ed.). 2008. “Citizenship Tests in a Post-National Era.” International journal on Multicultural Societies 10/1: 194.Google Scholar
Wynne, B. 1994. “Public Understanding of Science,” in Jasanoff, S., Markle, G., Peterson, J., and Pinch, T. (eds.), Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Yashar, D. 2005. Contesting Citizenship in Latin America: The Rise of Indigenous Movements and the Postliberal Challenge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yiftachel, O. 2006. Ethnocracy: Land and Identity Politics in Israel/Palestine. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Youmans, W.L., and York, J.C. 2012. “Social Media and the Activist Toolkit: User Agreements, Corporate Interests, and the Information Infrastructure of Modern Social Movements.” Journal of Communication 62/2: 315329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×