Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-vkn6t Total loading time: 1.701 Render date: 2022-08-17T23:03:06.412Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 October 2020

Robert W. Weisberg
Affiliation:
Temple University, Philadelphia
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Rethinking Creativity
Inside-the-Box Thinking as the Basis for Innovation
, pp. 458 - 483
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ABC News. (1999). The Deep Dive: One company’s secret weapon for innovation. Nightline program transcript, February 9, 1999. ciow.org/docs1/IDEO_Nightline.pdf, accessed July 10, 2019.Google Scholar
Abraham, A. (2018). The forest versus the trees: Creativity, cognition and imagination. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 195210). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abuhamdeh, S., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2004). The artistic personality: A systems perspective. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L. & Singer, J. L. (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization (pp. 3142). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acar, S., & Runco, M. R. (2014). Assessing associative distance among ideas elicited by tests of divergent thinking. Creativity Research Journal 26(2): 229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Addis, D. R., Pan, L., Musicaro, R. & Schacter, D. L. (2014). Divergent thinking and constructing episodic simulations. Memory 24(1): 8997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alloy, L. B., & Nusslock, R. (2019). Future directions for understanding adolescent bipolar spectrum disorders: A reward hypersensitivity perspective. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology 48(4): 669683.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altman, L. K. (1987). Who Goes First? The Story of Self-Experimentation in Medicine. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1979). Effects of external evaluation on artistic creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37(2): 221233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1983). The Social Psychology of Creativity. New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in Context: Update to the Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
Amabile, T. M., & Pratt, M. G. (2016). The dynamic componential model of creativity and innovation in organizations: Making progress, making meaning. Research in Organizational Behavior 36: 157183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Goldfarb, P., & Brackfield, S. C. (1990). Social influences on creativity: Evaluation, coaction, and surveillance. Creativity Research Journal 3(1): 621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Amabile, T. M., Hennessy, B. A., & Grossman, B. S. (1986). Social influences on creativity: The effects of contracted-for reward. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(1): 1423.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
America’s Test Kitchen (eds.). (2006). 834 Kitchen Quick Tips: Techniques and Shortcuts for the Curious Cook. Brookline, MA: America’s Test Kitchen.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N. C. (1987). Creativity and mental illness: Prevalence rates in writers and their first-degree relatives. American Journal of Psychiatry 144(10): 12881292.Google ScholarPubMed
Ash, I. K., Cushen, P. J., & Wiley, J. (2009). Obstacles in investigating the role of restructuring in insightful problem solving. Journal of Problem Solving 2(2): 641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K. W., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood–creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus? Psychological Bulletin 134(6): 779806. doi:10.1037/a0012815.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baas, M., Nijstad, B. A., Boot, N. C., & De Dreu, C. K. W. (2016). Mad genius revisited: Vulnerability to psychopathology, biobehavioral approach-avoidance, and creativity. Psychological Bulletin 142(6): 668692. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/bul0000049.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and Divergent Thinking: A Task-Specific Approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Baer, J. (2012). Domain specificity and the limits of creativity theory. The Journal of Creative Behavior 46(1): 1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J. (2015). The importance of domain-specific expertise in creativity. Roeper Review 37(3): 165178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baer, J., & McKool, S. S. (2014). The gold standard for assessing creativity. International Journal of Quality Assurance in Engineering and Technology Education 3(1): 8193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baird, B., Smallwood, J., Mrazek, M. D., Kam, J. W. Y., Franklin, M. S., & Smallwood, J. W. (2012). Inspired by distraction: Mind wandering facilitates creative incubation. Psychological Science 23(10): 11171122.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barron, F., & Harrington, D. M. (1981). Creativity, intelligence, and personality. Annual Review of Psychology 32: 439476.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barry, D. N., Barnes, G. R., Clark, I. A., & Maguire, E. A. (2019). The neural dynamics of novel scene imagery. The Journal of Neuroscience 39(22): 43754386.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barzun, J. (1960). The cults of “research” and “creativity.” Harper’s Magazine, October, 69–74.Google Scholar
Barzun, J. (1989). The paradoxes of creativity. The American Scholar 58(3): 337351.Google Scholar
Bassok, M., & Novick, L. R. (2012). Problem solving. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 413432). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Batey, M., & Furnham, A. (2006). Creativity, intelligence, and personality: A critical review of the scattered literature. Genetic, Social, and General Psychology Monographs 132(4): 355429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Kaufman, S. B., & Silvia, P. J. (2015). Default and executive network coupling supports creative idea production. Scientific Reports 5: 10,964. doi:10.1038/srep10964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Benedek, M., Silvia, P. J., & Schacter, D. L. (2016). Creative cognition and brain network dynamics. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 20(2): 8795. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2015.10.004.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. N., Christensen, A. P., Rosenberg, M. D., Benedek, M., Chen, Q., …, & Silvia, P. J. (2018). Robust prediction of individual creative ability from brain functional connectivity. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115(5): 10871092. doi:www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.1713532115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., Kenett, Y. K., Hass, R. W., & Schacter, D. L. (Unpublished). A fan effect for creative thought: Semantic richness facilitates idea quantity but constrains idea quality.Google Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2014). Does insight problem solving predict real-world creativity? Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(3): 287292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R., Seli, P., & Schacter, D. L. (2019). Network neuroscience of creative cognition: Mapping cognitive mechanisms and individual differences in the creative brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27: 2230. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2018.08.013.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaty, R. E., & Silvia, P. J. (2012). Why do ideas get more creative across time? An executive interpretation of the serial order effect in divergent thinking tasks. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 6(4): 309319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Nusbaum, E. C., Jauk, E., & Benedek, M. (2014). The roles of associative and executive processes in creative cognition. Memory & Cognition 42(7): 11861197. PMID 24898118; doi:10.3758/s13421-014-0428-8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Becker, G. (1978). The Mad Genius Controversy: A Study in the Sociology of Deviance. Beverley Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Becker, G. (2001). The association of creativity and psychopathology: Its cultural-historical origins. Creativity Research Journal 13(1): 4553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Becker, G. (2014). A socio-historical overview of the creativity–pathology connection: From antiquity to contemporary times. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness (pp. 324). Cambridge: Cambridge University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beda, Z., & Smith, S. M. (2018). Chasing red herrings: Memory of distractors causes fixation in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition 46(5): 671684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). Revisiting Mednick’s model on creativity-related differences in associative hierarchies: Evidence for a common path to uncommon thought. The Journal of Creative Behavior 47(4): 273289.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage 88(100): 125133. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2013.11.021.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Best, J. B. (1987). The subgoal heuristic and its effect on internal representations. Journal of General Psychology 114(4): 383391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bilalić, M., McLeod, P., & Gobet, F. (2008). Inflexibility of experts – reality or myth? Quantifying the Einstellung effect in chess masters. Cognitive Psychology 56(2): 73102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bloom, B. (1985). Developing Talent in Young People. New York: Ballantine Books.Google Scholar
Bloom, H. (2002). Genius: A Mosaic of One Hundred Exemplary Creative Minds. New York: Warner Books.Google Scholar
Boden, M. A. (1990). The Creative Mind: Myths and Mechanisms. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Bourne, L. E., Ekstrand, B. R., & Dominowski, R. L. (1971). The Psychology of Thinking. New York: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Bowden, E. M., & Grunewald, K. (2018). Whose insight is it anyway? In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 2850). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buckner, R. L. (2012). The serendipitous discovery of the brain’s default network. Neuroimage 62(2): 11371145. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.10.035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byron, K., & Khazanchi, S. (2012). Rewards and creative performance: A meta-analytic test of theoretically derived hypotheses. Psychological Bulletin 138(4): 809830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cai, D. J., Mednick, S. A., Harrison, E. M., Kanady, J. C., & Mednick, S. C. (2009). REM, not incubation, improves creativity by priming associative networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106: 10,13010,134. PMID 19506253; doi:10.1073/pnas.0900271106.Google Scholar
Campbell, D. T. (1960). Blind variation and selective retention in creative thought as in other knowledge processes. Psychological Review 67: 380400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Campbell, K. L., Madore, K. P., Benoit, R. G., Thakral, P. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2018). Increased hippocampus to ventromedial prefrontal connectivity during the construction of episodic future events. Hippocampus 28(2): 7680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Carrroll, J. B. (1993). Human Cognitive Abilities: A Survey of Factor-Analytic Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carson, S. H. (2014). Cognitive disinhibition, creativity, and psychopathology. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Genius (pp. 198221). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Carson, S. H. (2018). Creativity and psychopathology: A relationship of shared neurocognitive vulnerabilities. In Vartanian, O & Jung, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 136159). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catrambone, R., & Holyoak, K. J. (1989). Overcoming contextual limitations on problem-solving transfer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15: 11471156.Google Scholar
Ceulemans, C. (2010). The reputation of Baroque composers 1790–2000. Empirical Studies of the Arts 28(2): 223242. doi:https://doi.org/10.2190/EM.28.2.g.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, J., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). The importance of iteration in creative conceptual combination. Cognition 145: 104115.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chan, J., Dow, S. P., & Schunn, C. D. (2015). Do the best design ideas (really) come from conceptually distant sources of inspiration? Design Studies 36: 3158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Ericsson, K. A. (1982). Skill and working memory. In Bower, G. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation (Vol. 16, pp. 158). New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973a). Perception in chess. Cognitive Psychology 4: 5581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, W. G., & Simon, H. A. (1973b). The mind’s eye in chess. In Chase, W. G. (ed.), Visual information processing (pp. 215281). New York: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chein, J. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Working memory and insight in verbal problems: Analysis of compound remote associates. Memory and Cognition 42: 6783.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chein, J. M., Weisberg, R. W., Streeter, N. L., & Kwok, S. (2010). Working memory and insight in the 9-Dot Problem. Memory and Cognition 38(7): 883892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2011). Facilitate insight by non-invasive brain stimulation. PLoS ONE 6(2): e16655. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0016655.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chi, R. P., & Snyder, A. W. (2012). Brain stimulation enables the solution of an inherently difficult problem. Neuroscience Letters 515(2012): 121124. doi:10.1016/j.neulet.2012.03.012.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chipp, H. B. (1988). Picasso’s “Guernica”: History, Transformations, Meanings. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N. (1957). Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, B. T., & Schunn, C. D. (2007). The relationship of analogical distance to analogical function and pre-inventive structure: The case of engineering design. Memory & Cognition 35(1): 2938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G. (2018). The costs and benefits of cognitive control for creativity. In Vartanian, O & Jung, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 299317). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G. (2019). Creativity in and out of (cognitive) control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27: 9499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G., Berryhill, M. E., Bikson, M., & Coslett, H. B. (2017). Revisiting the effectiveness of transcranial direct current brain stimulation for cognition: Evidence, challenges, and open questions (Editorial). Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G., Hamilton, R. H., Coslett, H. B., Datta, A., Bikson, M., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2013). Non-invasive transcranial direct current stimulation over the left prefrontal cortex facilitates cognitive flexibility in tool use. Cognitive Neuroscience 4: 8189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chrysikou, E. G., & Thompson-Schill, S. L. (2011). Dissociable brains states linked to common and creative object use. Human Brain Mapping 32: 665675.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chuderski, A., & Jastrzębski, J. (2018). Much ado about aha!: Insight problem solving is strongly related to working memory capacity and reasoning ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 147(2): 257281. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinan, S., Özen, G., & Hampshire, A. (2013). Confirmatory factor analysis on separability of planning and insight constructs. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25(1): 723. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2012.729035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coleman, R. (1995). McCartney. Yesterday & Today. Los Angeles, CA: Dove Books.Google Scholar
Conti, R., Coon, H., & Amabile, T. M. (1996). Evidence to support the componential model of creativity: Secondary analyses of three studies. Creativity Research Journal 9: 385389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cope, D. (2014). Experiments in Musical Intelligence. Middleton, WI: A-R Editions, Inc.Google Scholar
Cramond, B., Matthews-Morgan, J., Bandalos, D., & Zuo, L. (2005). A report on the 40-year follow-up of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking: Alive and well in the new millennium. Gifted Child Quarterly 49: 283291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cranford, E. A., & Moss, J. (2012). Is insight always the same? A protocol analysis of insight in compound remote associate problems. The Journal of Problem Solving 4: 128153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person: A systems view of creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Current Psychological Perspectives (pp. 325339). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). Creativity: Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2014). The systems model of creativity and its applications. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Genius (pp. 533545). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Sawyer, K. (1995). Creative insight: The social dimension of a solitary moment. In Steinberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.) The Nature of Insight (pp. 329361). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Cushen, P.J., & Wiley, J. (2018). Both attentional control and the ability to make remote associations aid spontaneous analogical transfer. Memory & Cognition 46(8): 13981412. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0845-1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danek, A. H. (2018). Magic tricks, sudden restructuring and the Aha! experience: A new model of non-monotonic problem solving. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 5178). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danek, A. H., & Salvi, C. (2018). Moment of truth: Why Aha! experiences are correct. The Journal of Creative Behavior.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Danek, A. H., Williams, J., & Wiley, J. (2018). Closing the gap: Connecting sudden representational change to the subjective Aha! experience in insightful problem solving. Psychological Research 84(1): 19. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-018-0845-1.Google ScholarPubMed
Davidson, J. E. (1995). The suddenness of insight. In Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (eds.). The Nature of Insight (pp. 125155). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
DeCaro, M. S. (2018). When does higher working memory capacity help or hinder insight problem solving? In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 5178). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
De Groot, A. (1965). Thought and Choice in Chess. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Depue, R. A., & Iacono, W. G. (1989). Neurobehavioral aspects of affective disorders. Annual Review of Psychology 40: 457492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 93: 880896.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, A. (2004). The cognitive neuroscience of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6): 10111026.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, A. (2014). The mythconception of the mad genius. Frontiers of Psychology 5, Article 79. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00079.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietrich, A. (2018). Types of creativity. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11(6): 10111026. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1517-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dietrich, A., & Kanso, R. (2010). A review of EEG, ERP, and neuroimaging studies of creativity and insight. Psychological Bulletin 136(5): 822848. doi:10.1037/a0019749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Digman, J. M. (1997). Higher-order factors of the Big-5. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 73: 12461256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A., & Meurs, T. (2006). Where creativity resides: The generative power of unconscious thought. Consciousness and Cognition 15: 135146.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dijksterhuis, A., & Strick, M. (2016). A case for thinking without consciousness. Perspectives on Psychological Science 11(1): 117132. doi:10.1177/1745691615615317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dodds, R. A., Ward, T. B., & Smith, S. M. (2012). Incubation in problem solving and creativity. In Runco, M. A. (ed.), The Creativity Research Handbook, Volume 3 (pp. 251284). New York: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 365395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K. (2001). The analogical paradox: Why analogy is so easy in naturalistic settings, yet so difficult in the psychological laboratory. In Gentner, D, Holyoak, K. J., & Kokinov, B (eds.), Analogy: Perspectives from Cognitive Science (pp. 313334). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dunbar, K., & Blanchette, I. (2001). The in vivo/in vitro approach to cognition: The case of analogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 5(8): 334339.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duncker, K. (1945). On problem-solving. Psychological Monographs 68(5): whole no. 270.Google Scholar
Edwards, B. J., Williams, J. J., Gentner, D., & Lombrozo, T. (2014). Effects of comparison and explanation on analogical transfer. In Bello, P, Guarini, M, McShane, M, & Scassellati, B (eds.), Proceedings of the 36th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Red Hook, NY: Curran.Google Scholar
Eisenberger, R. & Byron, K. (2011). Rewards and creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S. R. (eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2nd ed., Vol. 2 (pp. 313318). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elgammal, A., & Saleh, B. (2015). Quantifying creativity in art networks. In Toivonen, H, Colton, S, Cook, M, & Ventura, D (eds.), Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Computational Creativity, pp. 3946. Provo, UT: Brigham Young University.Google Scholar
Engle, R. (2018). Working memory and executive attention: A revisit. Perspectives on Psychological Science 13(2): 190193. doi:10.1177/1745691617720478.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ericsson, K. A. (1999). Creative expertise as superior reproducible performance: Innovative and flexible aspects of expert performance. Psychological Inquiry 10: 329333.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A. (2006). The influence of experience and deliberate practice on the development of superior expert performance. In Ericsson, K. A., Charness, N, Feltovich, P, & Hoffman, R. R. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance (pp. 683704). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Chase, W. G., & Falloon, S. (1980). Acquisition of a memory skill. Science 208: 11811182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Hoffman, R. R., Kozbelt, A., & Williams, A. M. (eds.) (2018). Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review 100: 363406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Pool, R. (2016). Peak: Secrets from the New Science of Expertise. New York: Eamon Dolan Books/Houghton Mifflin & Harcourt.Google Scholar
Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1996). Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT PressGoogle Scholar
Erlin, M. & Tatlock, L. (2014). Distant Readings: Topologies of German Culture in the Long Nineteenth Century. Rochester, NY: Camden House.Google Scholar
Everett, W. (2001). The Beatles as Musicians. The Quarry Men through Rubber Soul. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1993). Creativity and personality: Suggestions for a theory. Psychological Inquiry 4: 147178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1995). Genius: The Natural History of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fatović-Ferenčić, S., & Banić, M. (2011). No acid, no ulcer: Dragutin (Carl) Schwarz (1868–1917), the man ahead of his time. Digestive Diseases 29(5): 507510. doi:10.1159/000334384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1993). A structural model of scientific eminence. Psychological Science 4: 366371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity. Personality and Social Psychology Review 2(4): 290309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feist, G. J. (1999). The influence of personality on artistic and scientific creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 273296). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2017). Personality, behavioral thresholds, and the creative scientist. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R, & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (pp. 6483). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. (2018). Creativity and the Big Two model of personality: plasticity and stability. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27: 3135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J. & Barron, F. (2003). Predicting creativity from early to late adulthood: Intellect, potential, and personality. Journal of Research in Personality 37: 6288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R., & Kaufman, J. C. (2017). The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flanagan, D., & Dixon, S. (2013). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities. In Reynolds, C. R., Vannest, K. J., & Fletcher-Janzen, E (eds.), Encyclopedia of Special Education. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Fleck, J. I., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The use of verbal protocols as data: An analysis of insight in the candle problem. Memory & Cognition 32: 9901006.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fleck, J. S., & Weisberg, R. W. (2013). Insight versus analysis: Evidence for diverse methods in problem solving. Journal of Cognitive Psychology 25: 436463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Foer, J. (2011). Moonwalking with Einstein: The Art and Science of Remembering Everything. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
Forbus, K. D., Ferguson, R. W., Lovett, A., & Gentner, D. (2017). Extending SME to handle large-scale cognitive modeling. Cognitive Science 41: 11521201. doi:10.1111/cogs.12377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, K. C. R., & Beaty, R. E. (2019). Mind-wandering as creative thinking: neural, psychological, and theoretical considerations. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 27: 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedel, R., & Israel, P. (1986). Edison’s Electric Light: Biography of an Invention. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Frensch, P. A., & Sternberg, R. J. (1989). Expertise and intelligent thinking: When is it worse to know better? In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), Advances in the Psychology of Human Intelligence, Vol. 5 (pp. 157188). Hillside, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fürst, G., & Lubart, T. (2017). An integrative approach to the creative personality: Beyond the Big Five paradigm. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R, & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (pp. 140164). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fürst, G., Ghisletta, P., & Lubart, T. (2014). Toward an integrative model of creativity and personality: Theoretical suggestions and preliminary empirical testing. The Journal of Creative Behavior 50(2): 87108. doi:10.1002/jocb.71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gable, S. L., Hopper, E. A., & Schooler, J. W. (2019). When the Muses strike: Creative ideas of physicists and writers routinely occur during mind wandering. Psychological Science 30(3): 396404. doi:10.1177/0956797618820626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gagné, F. (2009). Debating Giftedness: Pronat vs. Antinat. In Shavinina, L. V. (ed.), International Handbook on Giftedness (pp. 155204). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gagné, F. (2015). From genes to talent: The DMGT/CMTD perspective. Revista de Educación 368: 1237.Google Scholar
Galton, F. (1979 [1869]). Hereditary Genius: An Inquiry into Its Laws and Consequences. London: Friedmann.Google Scholar
Gardner, H. (1993). Creating Minds: An Anatomy of Creativity Seen through the Lives of Freud, Einstein, Picasso, Stravinsky, Eliot, Graham, and Gandhi. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Maravilla, F. (2018). Analogical reasoning. In Ball, L. J. & Thompson, V. A. (eds.), International Handbook of Thinking & Reasoning (pp. 186203). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: Analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cognitive Science 33: 13431382. doi:10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01070.x.Google ScholarPubMed
George, T., & Wiley, J. (2018). Breaking past the surface: Analogical transfer as creative insight. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origin of New Ideas (pp. 143168). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerard, A. (1774). An Essay on Genius. London: Stranahan Caddell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Getzels, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1976). The Creative Vision: A Longitudinal Study of Problem Finding in Art. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Ghiselin, B. (1996 [1952]). The Creative Process: A symposium. New York: Mentor.Google Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980). Analogical problem solving. Cognitive Psychology 12: 306355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1983). Schema induction and analogical transfer. Cognitive Psychology 15: 138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J. (2016). Incubation and intuition in creative problem solving. Frontiers in Psychology 7. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01076.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilhooly, K. J., & Fioratou, E. (2009). Executive functions in insight versus non-insight problem solving: An individual differences approach. Thinking & Reasoning 15(4): 355376Google Scholar
Gilhooly, K., Fioratou, E., Anthony, S., & Wynn, V. (2007). Divergent thinking: Strategies and executive involvement in generating novel uses for familiar objects. British Journal of Psychology 98(4): 611625.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gilhooly, K., & Murphy, P. (2005). Differentiating insight from non-insight problems. Thinking and Reasoning 11: 279302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilhooly, K. J., & Webb, M. E. (2018). Working memory in insight problem solving. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 105119). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2006). Persistence and fashion in art Italian Renaissance from Vasari to Berenson and beyond. Poetics 34: 2444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2010). On the formation of canons: The dynamics of art history. Empirical Studies of the Arts 28(1): 3772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ginsburgh, V., & Weyers, S. (2014). Evaluating excellence in the arts. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Genius (pp. 509532). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.Google Scholar
Glucksberg, S., & Weisberg, R. (1966). Verbal behavior and problem solving: Some effects of labeling in a functional fixedness task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 71: 659664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gobet, F., & Ereku, M. H. (2014). Checkmate to deliberate practice: The case of Magnus Carlsen. Frontiers in Psychology 5, Article 878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodwin, F. K., & Jamison, K. R. (1990). Manic-Depressive Illness. New York, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Grosul, M., & Feist, G. J. (2014). The creative person in science. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(1): 3043. doi:10.1037/a0034828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist 5: 444454.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin 53: 267293. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0040755.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guilford, J. P. (1967). The Nature of Human Intelligence. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Hadamard, J. (1945). The Psychology of Invention in the Mathematical Field. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hambrick, D. Z., Macnamara, B. N., Campitelli, G., Ullén, F., & Mosing, M. A. (2016). Beyond born versus made: A new look at expertise. In Ross, B. H. (ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Vol. 64 (pp. 155). London: Elsevier Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hass, R. (2017). Semantic search during divergent thinking. Cognition 166: 344357. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.05.039.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, R. W., & Beaty, R. E. (2018). Use or consequences: Probing the cognitive difference between two measures of divergent thinking. Frontiers in Psychology 9. doi:https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.02327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hass, R. W., & Weisberg, R. W. (2009). Career development in two seminal American songwriters: A test of the equal-odds rule. Creativity Research Journal 21: 183190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hass, R. W., Weisberg, R. W., & Choi, J. (2010). Quantitative case-studies in musical composition: The development of creativity in popular-songwriting teams. Psychology of Music 38(4): 463480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hassabis, D., Kumaran, D., Vann, S. D., & Maguire, E. A. (2007). Patients with hippocampal amnesia cannot imagine new experiences. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 104(5): 17261731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hayes, J. R. (1989). Cognitive processes in creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.). Handbook of Creativity (pp. 135145). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hedne, M. R., Norman, E., & Metcalfe, J. (2016). Intuitive feelings of warmth and confidence in insight and noninsight problem solving of magic tricks. Frontiers in Psychology 7, Article 1314. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hélie, S., & Sun, R. (2010). Incubation, insight, and creative problem solving: A unified theory and a connectionist model. Psychological Review 117(3): 9941024. doi:10.1037/a0019532.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Helson, R. (1999). A longitudinal study of creative personality in women. Creativity Research Journal 12: 89101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hofstadter, D., & Sander, E. (2013). Surfaces and Essences: Analogy as the Fuel and Fire of Thinking. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Hoicka, E., Mowat, R., Kirkwood, J., Kerr, T., & Carberry, M. (2016). One-year-olds think creatively, just like their parents. Child Development 87(4): 10991105. doi:10.1111/cdev.12531.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holyoak, K. J. (2012). Analogy and relational reasoning. In Holyoak, K. J. & Morrison, R. G. (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning (pp. 234259). New York: Oxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Horn, A. (1966). Jackson Pollock: The hollow and the bump. Carleton Miscellany 7: 8087.Google Scholar
Horn, J. L., & Cattell, R. B. (1966). Refinement and test of the theory of fluid and crystallized intelligence. Journal of Educational Psychology 57: 253270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howe, M. J. A., Davidson, J. W., & Sloboda, J. A. (1998). Innate talents: Reality or myth? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21: 399442.Google ScholarPubMed
Hsu, N. S., Novick, J. M., & Jaeggi, S. M. (2014). The development and malleability of executive control abilities. Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience 8: 221. doi:10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Isen, A. M. (2008). Some ways in which positive affect influences decision making and problem solving. In Lewis, M, Haviland-Jones, J. M., & Barrett, L. F. (eds.), Handbook of Emotions (pp. 548573). New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Isen, A.M., & Daubman, K.A. (1984). The influence of affect on categorization. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 47: 12061217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Isen, A. M., Daubman, K. A., & Nowicki, G. P. (1987). Positive affect facilitates creative problem solving. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 52: 11221131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamison, K. R. (1989). Mood disorders and patterns of creativity in British writers and artists. Psychiatry 52: 125134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jamison, K. (1993). Touched with Fire: Manic-Depressive Illness and the Artistic Temperament. New York: Free Press/Macmillan.Google Scholar
Jarosz, A. F., Colflesh, G. J. H., & Wiley, J. (2012). Uncorking the muse: Alcohol intoxication facilitates creative problem solving. Consciousness & Cognition 21: 487493. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2012.01.002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., & Neubauer, A. C. (2014). The road to creative achievement: A latent variable model of ability and personality predictors. European Journal of Personality 28(1): 95105. doi:10.1002/per.1941.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence 41(4): 212221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Johnson, S. L., Sandrow, D., Meyer, B., Winters, R., Miller, I., Keitner, G., & Solomon, D. (2000). Increases in manic symptoms following life events involving goal-attainment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 109: 721727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Joy, S. (2004). Innovation motivation: The need to be different. Creativity Research Journal 16(2–3): 313329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, S. (2017). Innovation motivation: A social learning model of originality. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R, & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (pp. 214234). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joy, S., & Hicks, S. (2004). The need to be different: Primary trait structure and impact on projective drawings. Creativity Research Journal 16(2–3): 330339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jung, R. E., Mead, B. S., Carrasco, J., & Flores, R. A. (2013). The structure of creative cognition in the human brain. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7, Article 330. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2013.00330.Google ScholarPubMed
Jung, R. E., & Vartanian, O. (eds.). (2018). Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaiser, D. (2005). Drawing Theories Apart: The Dispersion of Feynman Diagrams in Postwar Physics. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kant, I. (1951 [1892]). Critique of Judgment, trans. J. H. Bernard. New York: Hafner Publishing.Google Scholar
Kaplan, C. A., & Simon, H. A. (1990). In search of insight. Cognitive Psychology 22: 374419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karwowski, M., & Lebuda, I. (2016). The big five, the huge two, and creative self-beliefs: Ameta-analysis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10(2): 214232. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/aca0000035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2001). The Sylvia Plath effect: Mental illness in eminent creative writers. Journal of Creative Behavior 35: 3750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C. (2003). The cost of the muse: Poets die young. Death Studies 27: 813822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufman, J. C., & Beghetto, R. A. (2009). Beyond big and little: The Four C model of creativity. Review of General Psychology 13: 112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, J. C., & Sternberg, R. J. (eds.). (2010). Cambridge Handbook of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., & Gregoire, C. (2015). Wired to Create: Unraveling the Mysteries of the Creative Mind. New York: Perigee.Google Scholar
Kaufman, S. B., Quilty, L. C., Grazioplene, R. G., Hirsh, J. B., Gray, J. R., Peterson, J. B., & DeYoung, C. G. (2015). Openness to experience and intellect differentially predict creative achievement in the arts and sciences. Journal of Personality 84: 248258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaufmann, G., & Kaufmann, A. (2014). When good is bad and bad is good: Mood, bipolarity, and creativity. In Kaufman, J (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness (pp. 205235). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139128902.014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keane, M. (1987). On retrieving analogues when solving problems. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A 39(1): 2941.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kell, H. J., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2013). Who rises to the top? Early indicators. Psychological Science 24(5): 648659.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kenett, Y. N., & Austerweil, J. L. (2016). Examining search processes in low and high creative individuals with random walks. In Papafragou, A, Grodner, D, Mirman, D, & Trueswell, J. C. (eds.), Proceedings of the 38th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society (pp. 313318). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.Google Scholar
Kenett, Y. N., Beaty, R. E., Silvia, P. J., Anaki, D., & Faust, M. (2016). Structure and flexibility: Investigating the relation between the structure of the mental lexicon, fluid intelligence, and creative achievement. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 10: 377388.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kershaw, T. C., & Ohlsson, S. (2004). Multiple causes of difficulty in insight: The case of the nine-dot problem. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition 30: 313.Google ScholarPubMed
Kershaw, T. C., Flynn, C. K., & Gordon, L. T. (2013). Multiple paths to transfer and constraint relaxation in insight problem solving. Thinking & Reasoning 19(1): 96136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ketner, J. D. (2013). Andy Warhol. London: Phaidon.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2005). Can only intelligent people be creative? A meta-analysis. Journal of Secondary Gifted Education 16: 5766.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2008). Meta-analyses of the relationship of creative achievement to both IQ and divergent thinking test scores. Journal of Creative Behavior 42: 106130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2016). The Creativity Challenge: How We Can Recapture American Innovation. New York: Prometheus Books.Google Scholar
Kim, K. H. (2017). The Torrance Tests of creative thinking – figural or verbal: which one should we use? Creativity: Theories-Research-Applications 4(2): 302321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, L. A., Walker, L. M., & Broyles, S. J. (1996). Creativity and the five-factor model. Journal of Research in Personality 30: 189203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, R. (2006). The Judgment of Paris: The Revolutionary Decade That Gave the World Impressionism. New York: Walker Publishing Co.Google Scholar
Kinney, D. K., & Richards, R. (2014). Creativity as “compensatory advantage”: Bipolar and schizophrenic liability, the inverted-U hypothesis, and practical implications. In Kaufman, J. C. (ed.), Creativity and Mental Illness (pp. 295317). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klahr, D., & Simon, H. A. (1999). Studies of scientific discovery: Complementary approaches and convergent findings. Psychological Bulletin 125: 524543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klinger, E. (1999). Thought flow: Properties and mechanisms underlying shifts in content. In Singer, J. A. & Salovey, P (eds.), At Play in the Fields of Consciousness: Essays in Honor of Jerome L. Singer (pp. 2950). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., Haider, H., & Rhenius, D. (1999). Constraint relaxation and chunk decomposition in insight problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 25: 15341556.Google Scholar
Knoblich, G., Ohlsson, S., & Raney, G. (2001). An eye movement study of insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition 29: 10001009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koestler, A. (1964). The Act of Creation. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Köhler, W. (1925). The Mentality of Apes. New York: Harcourt, Brace and Co.Google Scholar
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2014). The cognitive neuroscience of insight. Annual Review of Psychology 65: 7193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kounios, J., & Beeman, M. (2015). The Eureka Factor: Aha Moments, Creative Insight, and the Brain. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2004). Reexamining the equal-odds rule in classical composers. In Frois, J. P., Andrade, P, & Marques, J. F. (eds.), Art and Science: Proceedings of the XVIII Congress of the International Association of Empirical Aesthetics (pp. 540543). Lisbon, Portugal: IAEA.Google Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2005). Factors affecting aesthetic success and improvement in creativity: A case study of the musical genres of Mozart. Psychology of Music 33: 235255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kozbelt, A. (2008). A quantitative analysis of Beethoven as self-critic: Implications for psychological theories of musical creativity. Psychology of Music 35: 147172.Google Scholar
Kraepelin, E. (1921). Manic-Depressive Insanity and Paranoia. London: Churchill Livingstone.Google Scholar
Kretz, D. R., & Krawczyk, D. C. (2014). Expert analogy use in a naturalistic setting. Frontiers in Psychology 5: 1333. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kris, E. (1952). Psychoanalytic Explorations in Art. New York: International Universities Press.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kurtz, K. J., & Loewenstein, J. (2007). Converging on a new role for analogy in problem solving and retrieval: When two problems are better than one. Memory & Cognition 35(2): 334341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2014). Creativity and Mental Illness: The Mad Genius in Question. London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kyaga, S. (2018). A heated debate: Time to address the underpinnings of the association between creativity and psychopathology? In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 114135). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316556238.008.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kyaga, S., Landen, M., Boman, M., Hultman, C. M., Langstrom, N., & Lichtenstein, P. (2013). Mental illness, suicide and creativity: 40-year prospective total population study. Journal of Psychiatric Research 47: 8390.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kyaga, S., Lichtenstein, P., Boman, M., Hultman, C., Langstrom, N., & Landen, M. (2011). Creativity and mental disorder: Family study of 300,000 people with severe mental disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry 199: 373379.Google ScholarPubMed
Kyllonen, P., & Kell, H. (2017). What is fluid intelligence? Can it be improved? In Rosén, M, Yang Hansen, K, & Wolff, U (eds.), Methodology of Educational Measurement and Assessment: Cognitive Abilities and Educational Outcomes: A Festschrift in Honour of Jan-Eric Gustafsson (pp. 1537). Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-43473-5_2.Google Scholar
Landau, E. (1989). Jackson Pollock. New York: Abrams.Google Scholar
Landmann, N., Kuhn, M., Maier, J. G., Feige, B., Spiegelhalder, K., Riemann, D., & Niussen, C. (2016). Sleep strengthens but does not reorganize memory traces in a verbal creativity task. Sleep 39(3): 705713. doi:10.5665/sleep.5556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laramée, F. D. (2018). Introduction to stylometry with Python. The Programming Historian 7. https://programminghistorian.org/en/lessons/introduction-to-stylometry-with-python, accessed August 3, 2018.Google Scholar
Lee, C. S., & Therriault, D. J. (2013). The cognitive underpinnings of creative thought: A latent variable analysis exploring the roles of intelligence and working memory in three creative thinking processes. Intelligence 41: 306320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LePort, A. K., Mattfeld, A.T., Dickinson-Anson, H., Fallon, J. H., Stark, C. E., Kruggel, F., Cahill, L., & McGaugh, J. L. (2012). Behavioral and neuroanatomical investigation of highly superior autobiographical memory (HSAM). Neurobiology of Learning and Memory 98(1): 7892. doi:10.1016/j.nlm.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewisohn, M. (1992). The Complete Beatles Chronicle. New York: Harmony.Google Scholar
Lewisohn, M. (2013). The Beatles – All These Years: Volume 1: Tune In. New York: Crown Archetype.Google Scholar
Li, J., Yao, L., Hendriks, E., & Wang, J. Z. (2012). Rhythmic brushstrokes distinguish van Gogh from his contemporaries: Findings via automated brushstroke extraction. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 34(6): 11591176.Google Scholar
Llano, M. T., Colton, S., Hepworth, R., & Gow, J. (2016). Automated fictional ideation via knowledge base manipulation. Cognitive Computation 8: 153174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Loewenstein, J. (2010). How one’s hook is baited matters for catching an analogy. In Ross, B (ed.), Psychology of Learning and Motivation, Volume 53 (pp. 149182). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Lord, W. (1983). The Miracle of Dunkirk. New York: The Viking Press.Google Scholar
Lowenstein, J., Thompson, L., & Gentner, D. (2003). Analogical learning in negotiation teams: Comparing cases promotes learning and transfer. Academy of Management Learning and Education 2: 119128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Getz, I. (1997). Emotion, metaphor, and the creative process. Creativity Research Journal 10: 285301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lubart, T. I., & Sternberg, R. J. (1995). An investment approach to creativity: Theory and data. In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B., & Finke, R. A. (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach (pp. 269302). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ludwig, A. M. (1998). Method and madness in the arts and sciences. Creativity Research Journal 11: 93101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lung, C.-T., & Dominowski, R. L. (1985). Effects of strategy instructions and practice on nine-dot problem solving. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 11(4): 804811. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.11.1-4.804.Google Scholar
Luria, A. R. (1968). The Mind of a Mnemonist: A Little Book about a Vast Memory. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
MacGregor, J. N., Ormerod, T. C., & Chronicle, E. P. (2001). Information processing and insight: A process model of performance on the nine-dot and related problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 27: 176201.Google ScholarPubMed
Mackinnon, D. W. (1962). The personality correlates of creativity: A study of American architects. In Nielsen, G. S. (ed.), Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Applied Psychology (pp. 1139). Copenhagen, Denmark: Munksgaard.Google Scholar
Maclean, N. (1972). Young Men and Fire. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Macnamara, B. N., Hambrick, D. Z., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). Deliberate practice and performance in music, games, sports, education, and professions: A meta-analysis. Psychological Science 25(8): 16081618. doi:10.1177/0956797614535810.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madore, K. P., Addis, D. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2015). Creativity and memory: Effects of an episodic-specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science 26(9): 14611468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Madore, K. P., Jing, H. G., & Schacter, D. L. (2019). Selective effects of specificity inductions on episodic details: evidence for an event construction account. Memory 27(2): 250260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maguire, E. A., & Mullally, S. L. (2013). The hippocampus: A manifesto for change. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 142(4): 11801189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maguire, E. A., Woollett, K., & Spiers, H. J. (2006). London taxi drivers and bus drivers: A structural MRI and neuropsychological analysis. Hippocampus 16: 10911101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mandler, J. M., & Mandler, G. (eds.) (1964). Thinking: From Association to Gestalt. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. J. (2002). The discovery that helicobacter pylori, a spiral bacterium, caused peptic ulcer disease. In Marshall, B (ed.), Helicobacter Pioneers (pp. 165202). Singapore: Blackwell Science Asia.Google Scholar
Marshall, B. J., & Warren, J. R. (1984). Unidentified curved bacilli in the stomach of patients with gastric and peptic ulceration. The Lancet 323(8390): 13111315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martindale, C. (1989). Personality, situation, and creativity. In Glover, J. A., Ronning, R. R., & Reynolds, C. R. (eds.), Handbook of Creativity (pp. 211228). New York: Plenum.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarter, R. (1997). Fallingwater: Frank Lloyd Wright. New York: Barnes & Noble.Google Scholar
McDermott, J. F. (2000). Emily Dickinson’s “nervous prostration” and its possible relationship to her work. The Emily Dickinson Journal 9: 7186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McDermott, J. F. (2001). Emily Dickinson revisited: A study of periodicity in her work. American Journal of Psychiatry 158: 686690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McMahon, D. M. (2013). Divine Fury: A History of Genius. New York: Basic BooksGoogle Scholar
Mednick, S. A. (1962). The associative basis of the creative process. Psychological Review 69: 220232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Metcalfe, J. (1986). Premonitions of insight predict impending error. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 12: 623634.Google Scholar
Metcalfe, J., & Wiebe, D. (1987). Intuition in insight and non-insight problem solving. Memory & Cognition 15: 238246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miles, B. (1997). Paul McCartney: Many Years from Now. New York: Henry Holt.Google Scholar
Miller, A. I. (1996). Insights of Genius: Imagery and Creativity in Science and Art. New York: Copernicus, an Imprint of Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mullally, S. L., & Maguire, E. A. (2014). Memory, imagination, and predicting the future: A common brain mechanism? The Neuroscientist 20(3): 220234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, P. (1989a). Poetic genius and its classical origins. In Murray, P (ed.), Genius: The History of an Idea (pp. 9–31). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, P. (1989b). Genius: The History of an Idea. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Murray, C. (2003). Human Accomplishment: The Pursuit of Excellence in the Arts and Sciences, 800 B.C. to 1950. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Newell, A., Shaw, C., & Simon, H. A. (1962). The processes of creative thinking. In Gruber, H. E., Terrell, G, & Wertheimer, M (eds.), Contemporary Approaches to Creative Thinking (pp. 153189). New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human Problem Solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Nordau, M. (1900). Degeneration. New York: D. Appleton & Co.Google Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., & Silvia, P. J. (2011). Are intelligence and creativity really so different? Fluid intelligence, executive processes, and strategy use in divergent thinking. Intelligence 39: 3645.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nusbaum, E. C., Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2014). Ready, set, create: What instructing people to “be creative” reveals about the meaning and mechanisms of divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 8(4): 423432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ochse, R. (1990). Before the Gates of Excellence: The Determinants of Creative Genius. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (1992). Information-processing explanations of insight and related phenomena. In Keane, M. T. & Gilhooly, K. J. (eds.), Advances in the Psychology of Thinking, Vol. 1 (pp. 144). New York: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (2011). Deep Learning: How the Mind Overrides Experience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohlsson, S. (2018). The dialectic between routine and creative cognition. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 827). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olby, R. (1994). The Path to the Double Helix. The Discovery of DNA. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Öllinger, M., Jones, G., & Knoblich, G. (2014). The dynamics of search, impasse, and representational change provide a coherent explanation of difficulty in the nine-dot problem. Psychological Research 78: 266275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Olton, R. M. (1979). Experimental studies of incubation: Searching for the elusive. Journal of Creative Behavior 13: 922.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osborn, A. F. (1963). Applied Imagination: Principles and Procedures of Creative Problem Solving, 3rd rev. ed. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons.Google Scholar
Palmer, E. D. (1954). Investigation of the gastric mucosa spirochetes of the human. Gastroenterology 27(2): 218220.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pariser, D. (1987). The juvenile drawings of Klee, Toulouse-Lautrec, and Picasso. Visual Arts Research 13: 5367.Google Scholar
Park, G., Lubinski, D., & Benbow, C. P. (2008). Ability differences among people who have commensurate degrees matter for scientific creativity. Psychological Science 19(10): 957961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perkins, D. N. (1981). The Mind’s Best Work. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Perkins, D. N. (2000). The Eureka Effect: The Art and Logic of Breakthrough Thinking. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Peterson, J. B., & Carson, S. (2000). Latent inhibition and openness to experience in a high-achieving student population. Personality and Individual Differences 28: 323332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Petroski, H. (1998). Invention by Design: How Engineers Get from Thought to Thing. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Plucker, J. (1999). Is the proof in the pudding? Reanalyses of Torrance’s (1958 to present) longitudinal study data. Creativity Research Journal 12: 103114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poincaré, H. (1913). The Foundations of Science. Lancaster, PA: Science Press.Google Scholar
Post, F. (1994). Creativity and psychopathology: A study of 291 world-famous men. The British Journal of Psychiatry 165: 2234. doi:10.1192/bjp.165.1.22.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ramey, C. H., & Weisberg, R. W. (2004). The “poetical activity” of Emily Dickinson: A further test of the hypothesis that affective disorders foster creativity. Creativity Research Journal 16: 173185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reeves, L. M., & Weisberg, R. W. (1994). Models of analogical transfer in problem solving. Psychological Bulletin 116: 381400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reverberi, C., Toraldo, A., D’Agostini, S., & Skrap, M. (2005). Better without (lateral) frontal cortex? Insight problems solved by frontal patients. Brain 128: 28822890.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richards, R., Kinney, D. K., Benet, M., & Marzel, A. P. C. (1988). Assessing everyday creativity: Characteristics of the Lifetime Creativity Scales and validation with three large samples. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 54: 476485.Google Scholar
Richardson, J. (with McCully, M) (1991). A Life of Picasso. Vol. 1: 1881–1906. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Richland, L. E., Holyoak, K. J., & Stigler, J. W. (2004). Analogy generation in eighth grade mathematics classrooms. Cognition and Instruction 22: 3760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Richter, I. (ed.). (1952). The Notebooks of Leonardo da Vinci. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Ritter, S. M., & Dijksterhuis, A. (2014). Creativity – the unconscious foundations of the incubation period. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 8: 215. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2014.00215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roberts, R. P., & Addis, D. R. (2018). A common mode of processing governing divergent thinking and future imagination. In Vartanian, O & Jung, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 211230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robinson, A. G., & Stern, S. (1997). Corporate Creativity: How Innovation and Improvement Actually Happen. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.Google Scholar
Rocke, A. J. (2010). Image and Reality: Kekulé, Kopp, and the Scientific Imagination. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rosenthal, R., & Rosnow, R. L. (1991). Essentials of Behavioral Research: Methods and Data Analysis, 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1989). The Emerging Goddess: The Creative Process in Art, Science, and Other Fields. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, A. (1990). Creativity and Madness: New Findings and Old Stereotypes. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Rubenson, D. L., & Runco, M. A. (1992). The psychoeconomic approach to creativity. New Ideas in Psychology 10: 131147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A. (2011). Tests of creativity. In Runco, M. A. & Pritzker, S (eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, 2nd ed. (pp. 423426). San Diego, CA: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal 24(1): 6675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The standard definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 21: 9296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Runco, M. A., Millar, G., Acar, S., & Cramond, B. (2010). Torrance tests of creative thinking as predictors of personal and public achievement: A fifty-year follow-up. Creativity Research Journal 22(4): 361368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruscio, J., Whitney, D., & Amabile, T. M. (1998). Looking inside the fishbowl of creativity: verbal and behavioral predictors of creative performance. Creativity Research Journal 11: 243263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: More than meets the eye? Creativity Research Journal 27(4): 342352.Google Scholar
Sass, L. A. (2001). Schizophrenia, modernism, and the “creative imagination”: On creativity and psychopathology. Creativity Research Journal 13: 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaller, M. (1997). The psychological consequences of fame: Three tests of the self-consciousness hypothesis. Journal of Personality 65(2): 291309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheerer, M. (1963). On problem-solving. Scientific American 208: 118128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlesinger, J. (2009). Creative mythconceptions: A closer look at the evidence for the “mad genius” hypothesis. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 3(2): 6272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schlesinger, J. (2012). The Insanity Hoax: Exposing the Myth of the Mad Genius. Ardsley-on-Hudson, NY: Shrinktunes Media.Google Scholar
Schneider, W. J., & McGrew, K. (2012). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll model of intelligence. In Flanagan, D & Harrison, P (eds.), Contemporary Intellectual Assessment: Theories, Tests, and Issues, 3rd ed. (pp. 99144). New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Schönauer, M., Brodt, S., Pöhlchen, D., Breßmer, A., Danek, A. H., & Gais, S. (2018). Sleep does not promote solving classical insight problems and magic tricks. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 12, Article ID 72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schou, M. (1979). Artistic productivity and lithium prophylaxis in manic-depressive illness. The British Journal of Psychiatry 135: 97103.Google ScholarPubMed
Schuldberg, D. (2001). Six subclinical “spectrum” traits in “normal creativity.Creativity Research Journal 13: 516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1990). Feelings as information: Informational and motivational functions of affective states. In Higgins, E. T. & Sorrentino, R. M. (eds.), Handbook of Motivation and Cognition: Foundations of Social Behavior, Vol. 2 (pp. 527561). New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2003). Mood as information: 20 years later. Psychological Inquiry 14: 296303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seifert, C. M., Meyer, D. E., Davidson, N., Patalano, A. L., & Yaniv, I. (1995). Demystification of cognitive insight: Opportunistic assimilation and the prepared-mind perspective. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 65124). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Shaw, E. D., Mann, J. J., Stokes, P. E., & Manevitz, A. Z. (1986). Effects of lithium carbonate on associative productivity and idiosyncrasy in bipolar outpatients. The American Journal of Psychiatry 143(9): 11661169.Google ScholarPubMed
Silvia, P. J. (2008). Another look at creativity and intelligence: Exploring higher-order models and probable confounds. Personality and Individual Differences 44: 10121021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvia, P. J. (2015). Intelligence and creativity are pretty similar after all. Educational Psychology Review 27: 599606.Google Scholar
Silvia, P. J., & Beaty, R. E. (2012). Making creative metaphors: The importance of fluid intelligence for creative thought. Intelligence 40: 343351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simon, H. A. (1986). The information-processing explanation of Gestalt phenomena. Computers in Human Behavior 2: 241255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1984). Genius, Creativity, and Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1988). Creativity, leadership, and chance. In Sternberg, R. J. (ed.), The Nature of Creativity: Current Psychological Perspectives (pp. 386426). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1995). Foresight in insight? A Darwinian answer. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 465494). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (1999). Origins of Genius: Darwinian Perspectives on Creativity. New York: Oxford.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2011). Exceptional talent and genius. In Chamorro-Premuzic, T, Stumm, S & Furnham, A (eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences (pp. 635655). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (ed.) (2014). Wiley Handbook of Genius. Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2016). Creativity, automaticity, irrationality, fortuity, fantasy, and other contingencies: An eightfold response typology. Review of General Psychology 20: 194204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2017). Creative genius and psychopathology: Creativity as positive and negative personality. In Feist, G. J., Reiter-Palmon, R & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), Cambridge Handbook of Creativity and Personality Research (pp. 235250). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simonton, D. K. (2018). Creative ideas and the creative process: Good news and bad news for the neuroscience of creativity. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 918). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sio, U. N., & Ormerod, T. C. (2009). Does incubation enhance problem solving? A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin 135(1): 94120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Slater, E., & Mayer, A. (1959). Contributions to a pathography of the musicians: I. Robert Schumann. Confinia Psychiatrica 2: 6594.Google ScholarPubMed
Sloboda, J. A., Davidson, J. W., Howe, M. J. A., & Moore, D. G. (1996). The role of practice in the development of performing musicians. British Journal of Psychology 87(2): 287309.Google Scholar
Smallwood, J., & Schooler, J. W. (2015). The science of mind wandering: Empirically navigating the stream of consciousness. Annual Review of Psychology 66: 487518.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Smith, S. M. (1995). Getting into and out of mental ruts: A theory of fixation, incubation, and insight. In Sternberg, R. J. & Davidson, J. E. (eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 121149). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Smith, K. A., Huber, D. E., & Vul, E. (2013). Multiply-constrained semantic search in the Remote Associates Test. Cognition 128(1): 6475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Soler, J. M. (2007). A rational indicator of scientific creativity. Journal of Informetrics 1(2): 123130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017a). The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 113: 117143.Google ScholarPubMed
Soto, C. J., & John, O. P. (2017b). Short and extra-short forms of the Big Five Inventory–2: The BFI-2-S and BFI- 2-XS. Journal of Research in Personality 68: 6981.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Speck, R. M, Weisberg, R. W., & Fleisher, L. A. (2015). Varying goals and approaches of innovation centers in academic health systems: a semistructured qualitative study. Academic Medicine 90(8): 11321136.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sternberg, R. J. (1996). Costs of expertise. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 347354). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (1998). Darwinian creativity as a conventional religious faith. Psychological Inquiry 10(4): 357359.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2018). A triangular theory of creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts 12(1): 5067.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (1982). The mind of the puzzler. Psychology Today 16 (June): 3744.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Bridges, S. L. (2014). Varieties of genius. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), Handbook of Genius (pp. 185197). Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Davidson, J. E. (eds.). (1995). The Nature of Insight. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., Kaufman, J. C., & Pretz, J. E. (2002). The Creativity Conundrum: A Propulsion Model of Kinds of Creative Contributions. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the Crowd. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1996). Investing in creativity. American Psychologist 51: 677688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, C. L. (2017). Creativity and mood disorder: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Perspectives on Psychological Science 12(6): 10401076. doi:10.1177/1745691617699653.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thagard, P. (1999). How Scientists Explain Disease. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thrakal, P. P., Madore, K. P., & Schacter, D. L. (2017). A role for the left angular gyrus in episodic simulation and memory. The Journal of Neuroscience 37(34): 81428149. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1319-17.2017.Google Scholar
Toker, F. (2003). Fallingwater Rising: Frank Lloyd Wright, E. J. Kaufmann, and America’s Most Extraordinary House. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding Creative Talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torrance, E. P. (1981). Predicting the creativity of elementary school children (1958–80) – and the teacher who “made a difference.Gifted Child Quarterly 25(2): 5562. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/001698628102500203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treffert, D. A. (2011). Islands of Genius: The Bountiful Mind of the Autistic, Acquired, and Sudden Savant. London and New York: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.Google Scholar
Trench, M., & Mervino, R. A. (2015). The role of surface similarity in analogical retrieval: Bridging the gap between the naturalistic and the experimental traditions. Cognitive Science 39: 12921319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullén, F., Hambrick, D. Z., & Mosing, M. A. (2016). Rethinking expertise: A multifactorial gene–environment interaction model of expert performance. Psychological Bulletin 142(4): 427446.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Underwood, T., Bamman, D., & Lee, S. (2018). The transformation of gender in English-language fiction. Cultural Analytics (February 13). doi:https://doi.org/10.22148/16.019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vallée-Tourangeau, F. (ed.). (2018). Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O. (2018). Openness to Experience: Insights from Personality Neuroscience. In Vartanian, O & Jung, R. E. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 464475). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vartanian, O., & Jung, R. E. (eds.). (2018). The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasari, G. (1991 [1550]). The Lives of the Artists. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Volle, E. (2018). Associative and controlled cognition in divergent thinking: Theoretical, experimental, neuroimaging evidence, and new directions. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 333362). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallach, M., & Kogan, N. (1965). Modes of Thinking in Young Children: A Study of the Creativity–Intelligence Distinction. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
Wallas, G. (1926). The Art of Thought. London: Cape.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (1995). What’s old about new ideas? In Smith, S. M., Ward, T. B. & Finke, R. A. (eds.), The Creative Cognition Approach (pp. 157178). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Ward, T. B. (2018). Creativity as a continuum. In Sternberg, R. J. & Kaufman, J. C. (eds.), The Nature of Human Creativity (pp. 335350). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warren, J. R., & Marshall, B. J. (1983). Unidentified curved bacilli on gastric epithelium in active gastritis. The Lancet 321(8336): 12731275.Google Scholar
Watson, J. B. (1930). Behaviorism (revised edition). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Watson, J. D. (1968). The Double Helix: A Personal Account of the Discovery of the Structure of DNA. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
Weinberger, A. B., Green, A., & Chrysikou, E. G. (2017). Using transcranial direct current stimulation to enhance creative cognition: Interactions between task, polarity, and stimulation site. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 11: 246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisberg, R. W. (1986). Creativity: Genius and Other Myths. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1993). Creativity: Beyond the Myth of Genius. New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (1994). Genius and madness? A quasi-experimental test of the hypothesis that manic-depression increases creativity. Psychological Science 5: 361367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2004). On structure in the creative process: a quantitative case-study of the creation of Picasso’s Guernica. Empirical Studies in the Arts 22: 2354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2006). Creativity: Understanding Innovation in Problem Solving, Science, Invention, and the Arts. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2013).On the “demystification” of insight: A critique of neuroimaging studies of insight. Creativity Research Journal 25: 114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2014). Case studies of genius: Ordinary thinking, extraordinary outcomes. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), The Wiley Handbook of Genius (pp. 139165). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2015). On the usefulness of value in the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 27(2): 111124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2018a). Expertise and structured imagination in creative thinking: Reconsideration of an old question. In Ericsson, K. A. et al. (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Expertise and Expert Performance, 2nd ed. (pp. 812834). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2018b). Insight, problem solving, and creativity: An integration of findings. In Vallée-Tourangeau, F (ed.), Insight: On the Origins of New Ideas (pp. 191215). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W. (2018c). Response to Harrington on the definition of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 30(4): 461465.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., & Alba, J. W. (1981). An examination of the alleged role of “fixation” in the solution of several “insight” problems. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 110: 169192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., & Reeves, L. M. (2013). Cognition: From Memory to Creativity. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley Publishers.Google Scholar
Weisberg, R. W., Speck, R. M., & Fleisher, L. A. (2014). Fostering innovation in medicine: A conceptual framework for medical centers. Healthcare 2: 9093. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.hjdsi.2013.09.007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Weisberg, R. W., & Suls, J. M. (1973). An information-processing model of Duncker’s candle problem. Cognitive Psychology 4: 255276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wertheimer, M. (1982). Productive Thinking (enlarged ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: the effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition 26: 716730.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wiley, J., & Jarosz, A. F. (2012). Working memory capacity, attentional focus, and problem solving. Current Directions in Psychological Science 21(4): 258262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winner, E. (1996). The rage to master: The decisive role of talent in the visual arts. In Ericsson, K. A. (ed.), The Road to Excellence: The Acquisition of Expert Performance in the Arts and Sciences, Sports, and Games (pp. 271301). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Winner, E. (2014). Child prodigies and adult genius: A weak link. In Simonton, D. K. (ed.), Handbook of Genius (pp. 297320). Chichester: Wiley–Blackwell.Google Scholar
Woodworth, R. (1938). Experimental Psychology. New York: Holt.Google Scholar
Woollett, K., & Maguire, E. A. (2011). Acquiring “the knowledge” of London’s layout drives structural brain changes. Current Biology 21: 21092114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wordsworth, W. (1899 [1802]). Lyrical Ballads with Pastoral and Other Poems, 3rd ed. London: T. N. Longman and Rees.Google Scholar
Zabelina, D. (2018). Creativity and attention. In Jung, R. E. & Vartanian, O (eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of the Neuroscience of Creativity (pp. 161179). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, L., & Sternberg, R. J. (2011). Revisiting the investment theory of creativity. Creativity Research Journal 23(3): 229238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zimmerman, R. (2010). The Universe in a Mirror: The Saga of the Hubble Space Telescope and the Visionaries Who Built It. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar