Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-55597f9d44-xbgml Total loading time: 0.546 Render date: 2022-08-10T08:13:44.853Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "useRatesEcommerce": false, "useNewApi": true } hasContentIssue true

13 - Is disclosure in the best interests of children conceived by donation?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Martin Richards
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Guido Pennings
Affiliation:
Universiteit Gent, Belgium
John B. Appleby
Affiliation:
University of Cambridge
Get access

Summary

Introduction

In families in which parents conceived using donated sperm or donated eggs, only one parent will be the genetic parent of the child: the mother in the case of sperm donation and the father in the case of egg donation. Parents can choose to tell or not to tell their child about their donor conception. In families in which parents choose not to tell, children will grow up unaware that the person that they think of as their mother or father is not, in fact, their genetic parent. Furthermore, families in which children were conceived using an anonymous donor will likely never be able to know detailed or identifying information about their donor. In countries where donor anonymity has ended and donor-conceived adults are able to access information about their donor, it is still the case that if someone does not know they were donor conceived they will have no reason to access information about their donor. Therefore, is it in the child’s best interests to be told about their donor conception?

This chapter outlines empirical research and ethical reasoning to discuss whether disclosure of donor origins is in a child’s best interests. Our discussion considers deontological (duty-based) and consequentialist (outcome-based) ethics in relation to disclosure. We hold that the question of whether to disclose can best be answered by reviewing at least three types of considerations for each child: (1) medical welfare; (2) family welfare; and (3) rights. These considerations build on the established empirical evidence presented in the first half of this chapter. Our intention is to clarify reasons why telling or not telling may be the best decision.

Type
Chapter
Information
Reproductive Donation
Practice, Policy and Bioethics
, pp. 231 - 249
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baier, A. 1986 Trust and antitrustEthics 96 231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barton, M.Walker, K.Weisner, B. P. 1945 Artificial inseminationBritish Medical Journal 1 40CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blake, L.Casey, P.Readings, J.Jadva, V. 2010 “Daddy ran out of tadpoles”: how parents tell their children that they are donor conceived, and what their 7-year-olds understandHuman Reproduction 25 1CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bok, S. 1999 Lying: Moral Choice in Public and Private LifeNew YorkVintageGoogle Scholar
Brewaeys, A.Golombok, S.Naaktgeboren, N.de Bruyn, J. K. 1997 Donor insemination: Dutch parents’ opinions about confidentiality and donor anonymity and the emotional adjustment of their childrenHuman Reproduction 12 1591CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dworkin, G. 1997 The Theory and Practice of AutonomyCambridge University Press
Godman, K. M.Sanders, K.Rosenberg, M.Burton, P. 2006 Potential sperm donors’, recipients’ and their partners’ opinions towards the release of identifying information in Western AustraliaHuman Reproduction 21 3022CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Brewaeys, A.Cook, R.Giavazzi, M. T. 1996 The European study of assisted reproduction families: family functioning and child developmentHuman Reproduction 11 2324CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Murray, C.Brinsden, P.Abdalla, H. 1999 Social versus biological parenting: family functioning and the socioemotional development of children conceived by egg or sperm donationJournal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 40 519CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Brewaeys, A.Giavazzi, M. T.Guerra, D. 2002 The European study of assisted reproduction families: the transition to adolescenceHuman Reproduction 17 830CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Golombok, S.Lycett, E.MacCallum, F.Jadva, V. 2004 Parenting infants conceived by gamete donationJournal of Family Psychology 18 443CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Jadva, V.Lycett, E.Murray, C. 2005 Families created by gamete donation: follow-up at age 2Human Reproduction 20 286CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Murray, C.Jadva, V.Lycett, E. 2006 Non-genetic and non-gestational parenthood: consequences for parent-child relationships and the psychological well-being of mothers, fathers and children at age 3Human Reproduction 21 1918CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Golombok, S.Readings, J.Blake, L.Casey, P.Mellish, L.Marks, A. 2011 Children conceived by gamete donation: psychological adjustment and mother–child relationships at age 7Journal of Family Psychology 25 230CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hahn, C. S. 2001 Review: Psychosocial well-being of parents and their children born after assisted reproductionJournal of Pediatric Psychology 26 525CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardin, R. 1992 The street-level epistemology of trustAnalyse Kritik 14 152CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hargreaves, K.Daniels, K. R. 2007 Parents’ dilemmas in sharing donor insemination conception stories with their childrenChildren and Society 21 420CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) 2004 www.opsi.gov.uk/SI/si2004/20041511.htm
Hunter, M.Salter-Ling, N.Glover, L. 2000 Donor insemination: telling children about their originsChild Psychology and Psychiatry 5 157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jadva, V.Freeman, T.Kramer, W.Golombok, S. 2009 The experiences of adolescents and adults conceived by sperm donation: comparisons by age of disclosure and family typeHuman Reproduction 24 1909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jones, K. 1996 Trust as an Affective AttitudeEthics 107 4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klock, S. C.Maier, D. 1991 Psychological factors related to donor inseminationFertility and Sterility 56 489CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kovacs, G. T.Mushin, D.Kane, H.Baker, H. W. G. 1993 A controlled study of the psycho-social development of children conceived following insemination with donor semenHuman Reproduction 8 788CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lalos, A.Gottlieb, C.Lalos, O. 2007 Legislated right for donor-insemination children to know their genetic origin: a study of parental thinkingHuman Reproduction 22 1759CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Laruelle, C.Place, I.Demeestere, I.Englert, Y. 2011 Anonymity and secrecy options of recipient couples and donors, and ethnic origin influence in three types of oocyte donationHuman Reproduction 26 382CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lutjen, P.Trounson, A.Leeton, J.Findlay, J. 1984 The establishment and maintenance of pregnancy using in vitro fertilisation and embryo donation in a patient with primary ovarian failureNature 307 174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lycett, E.Daniels, K. R.Curson, R.Chir, B. 2004 Offspring created as a result of donor insemination: a study of family relationships, child adjustment, and disclosureFertility and Sterility 82 172CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
MacDougall, K.Becker, G.Scheib, J. E.Nachtigall, R. D. 2007 Strategies for disclosure: how parents approach telling their children that they were conceived with donor gametesFertility and Sterility 87 524CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mahlstedt, P. P.LaBounty, K.Kennedy, W. T. 2009 The views of adult offspring of sperm donation: essential feedback for the development of ethical guidelines within the practice of assisted reproductive technology in the United StatesFertility and Sterility 93 2236CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Murray, C.MacCallum, F.Golombok, S. 2006 Egg donation parents and their children: follow-up at age 12 yearsFertility and Sterility 85 610CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nachtigall, R. D.Tschann, J. M.Szkupinski Quiroga, S.Pitcher, L. 1997 Stigma, disclosure, and family functioning among parents of children conceived through donor inseminationFertility and Sterility 68 83CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
O’Neill, O. 2007 Autonomy and Trust in BioethicsCambridge University Press
Palacios, J.Brodzinsky, D. M. 2010 Review: Adoption research. Trends, topics, outcomesInternational Journal of Behavioral Development 34 270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paul, M. S.Berger, R. 2007 Topic avoidance and family functioning in families conceived with donor inseminationHuman Reproduction 22 2566CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pennings, G. 2001 The right to privacy and access to information about one’s genetic originsMedicine and Law 20 1Google ScholarPubMed
Raoul-Duval, A.Letur-Konrisch, H.Frydman, R. 1992 Anonymous oocyte donation: a psychological study of recipients, donors and childrenHuman Reproduction 7 51CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rumball, A.Adair, V. 1999 Telling the story: parents’ scripts for donor offspringHuman Reproduction 14 1392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheib, J. E. 2003 Choosing identity-release sperm donors: the parents’ perspective 13–18 years laterHuman Reproduction 18 1115CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shehab, D.Duff, J.Pasch, L. A.MacDougall, K. 2008 How parents whose children have been conceived with donor gametes make their disclosure decision: contexts, influences, and couple dynamicsFertility and Sterility 89 179CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shelton, K. H.Boivin, J.Hay, D.Den Bree, M. B. M. vanRice, F. J.Harold, G. T. 2009 Examining differences in psychological adjustment problems among children conceived by assisted reproductive technologiesInternational Journal of Behavioral Development 33 385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smart, C. 2009 Family secrets: law and understandings of openness in everyday relationshipsJournal of Social Policy 38 551CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sumner, L. W. 1999 Welfare, Happiness, and EthicsNew YorkOxford University PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turner, A. J.Coyle, A. 2000 What does it mean to be a donor offspring? The identity experiences of adults conceived by donor insemination and the implications for counselling and therapyHuman Reproduction 15 2041CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8
Cited by

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×