Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T18:41:55.999Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Bibliography

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

Sonu Bedi
Affiliation:
Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Rejecting Rights , pp. 191 - 201
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abraham, Henry J. 1990. “Of Courts, Judicial Tools, and Equal Protections.” In The Constitutional Bases of Political and Social Change in the United States (Slonim, Shlomo, ed.) Westport, Conn.: Praeger Publishers.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1980. Social Justice and the Liberal State. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1983. “What is Neutral about Neutrality?” Ethics 93(2) (January): 372–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1994. “Political Liberalisms.” The Journal of Philosophy 91(7) (July): 364–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce. 1998. We the People: Transformations, Vol. 2. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Ackerman, Bruce and Alstott, Anne. 1999. The Stakeholder Society. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Alexander, Larry. 1998. “Affirmative Action and Legislative Purpose: correspondence to Jed Rubenfeld (1997) ‘Affirmative Action’.” 107 Yale Law Journal2679.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, Anita L. 1999. “Coercing Privacy.” 40 William and Mary Law Review723 (March).Google Scholar
American Heritage Dictionary. 2001. New York: Dell.
Anderson, Perry. 1974. Lineages of the Absolutist State. London: Verso.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. Anthony. 1994. “Identity, Authenticity, Survival: Multicultural Societies and Social Reproduction.” In Multiculturalism: Examining the Politics of Recognition (Gutmann, Amy, ed.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Appiah, K. Anthony. 1996. “Against National Culture.” In Text and Nation: Cross-Disciplinary Essays on Cultural and National Identities (García-Moreno, Laura and Pfeiffer, Peter C., eds.) Columbia, S.C.: Camden, 1996.Google Scholar
Archard, David. 1990. “Freedom Not to be Free: The Case of the Slavery Contract in J.S. Mill's ‘On Liberty’.” The Philosophical Quarterly 40(161) (October): 453–465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arkes, Hadley. 1995. The Return of George Sutherland: Restoring a Jurisprudence of Natural Rights. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Arneson, Richard L. 1980. “Mill versus Paternalism.” Ethics 90(4) (July): 470–489.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bailyn, Bernard. 1967. The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution. New York: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2001. What Brown v. Board of Education Should have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Landmark Civil Rights Decision (Balkin, Jack M., ed.) New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack. 2005. What Roe v. Wade Should have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision (Balkin, Jack M., ed.) New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Balkin, Jack and Siegel, Reva B.. 2003. “The American Civil Rights Tradition: Anticlassification or Antisubordination.” 58 University of Miami Law Review9.Google Scholar
Barber, Benjamin R. 1983. “Unconstrained Conversations: A Play on Words, Neutral and Otherwise.” Ethics 93(2) (January): 330–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barnett, Randy E. 2003. Kennedy's Libertarian Revolution, National Review Online (July 10, 2003), www.nationalreview.com/comment/comment-barnett071003.asap
Barry, Brian. 1995. Justice as Impartiality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 2001. Culture and Equality. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Barry, Kathleen. 1995. The Prostitution of Sexuality. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Beard, Charles. 1913. An Economic Interpretation of the Constitution of the United States. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Beatty, David M. 1994. “Human Rights and the Rule of Law.” In Human Rights and Judicial Review: A Comparative Perspective (Beatty, David M., ed.) Boston: Kluwer Press.Google Scholar
Becker, Gary S. 1985. “Human Capital, Effort, and the Sexual Division of Labor.” Journal of Labor Economics 3(1) Part 2: Trends in Women's Work, Education, and Family Building: S33–S58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bedi, Sonu. 2007. “What is so Special About Religion? The Dilemma of the Religious Exemption.” Journal of Political Philosophy 15(2) (June): 235–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1986. Critique, Norm, and Utopia: A Study of the Foundations of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 1992. Situating the Self. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2002. The Claims of Culture: Equality and Diversity in the Global Era. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Benhabib, Seyla. 2004. The Rights of Others: Aliens, Residents, and Citizens. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bentham, Jeremy. 1987 [1843]. “Anarchical Fallacies.” In Nonsense Upon Stilts: Bentham, Burke and Marx on the Rights of Man (Waldron, J., ed.) London: Methuen.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1970 [1958]. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” In Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bickel, Alexander M. 1986. The Least Dangerous Branch: the Supreme Court at the Bar of Politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Blair, R. J. R. 2001. “Neurocognitive models of aggression, the antisocial personality disorders, and psychopathy.” Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry 71: 727–731.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boas, Franz. 1940. Race, Language and Culture. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bork, Robert H. 1990. The Tempting of America. New York: Touchstone.Google Scholar
Braman, Donald. 1999. “Of Race and Immutability.” 46 University of California, Los Angeles Law Review1375.Google Scholar
Brest, Paul, Levinson, Sanford, Balkin, Jack M., Amar, Akhil Reed, and Siegel, Reva B.. 2006. Processes of Constitutional Decisionmaking: Cases and Materials. 5th edn. New York: Aspen Publishers.Google Scholar
Brettschneider, Corey. 2007. Democratic Rights: The Substance of Self-Government. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Breyer, Stephen. 2005. Active Liberty: Interpreting our Democratic Constitution. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Burke, Edmund. 1973 [1790]. Reflections on the Revolution in France. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Burt, Robert A. 1992. The Constitution in Conflict. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido. 1990. The Supreme Court: 1990 Term. “Foreword: Antidiscrimination and Constitutional Accountability (What the Bork-Brennan Debate Ignores).” Harvard Law Review 105(80).Google Scholar
Calabresi, Guido and Melamed, Douglas A.. 1972. “Property Rules, Liability Rules, and Inalienability: One View of the Cathedral.” Harvard Law Review 85(6).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, Stephen L. 1993. The Culture of Disbelief: How American Law and Politics Trivialize Religious Devotion. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Chapman, Philip. 2004. Note, “Beyond Gay Rights: Lawrence v. Texas and the Promise of Liberty,” 13 William and Mary Bill of Rights Journal245.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2003. “Mock Brief for Petitioners in Brown.” 52 American University Law Review1391.Google Scholar
Chemerinsky, Erwin. 2005. Constitutional Law. 2nd edn. New York: Aspen Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, G. A. 1989. “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice.” Ethics 99(4): 906–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, Jean. 2002. Regulating Intimacy: A New Legal Paradigm. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colker, Ruth. 1986. “Anti-Subordination Above All Else: Sex, Race, and Equal Protection.” 61 New York University Law Review1003.Google Scholar
Cover, Robert M. 1983. “The Supreme Court: 1982 Term. ‘Foreword: Nomos and Narrative.’ ” 97 Harvard Law Review 4: 4–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crenshaw, Kimberly. 1989. “Demarginalizing the Intersection of Race and Sex: A Black Feminist Critique of Antidiscrimination Doctrine, Feminist Theory, and Antiracist Politics.” University of Chicago Legal Forum139.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert. 2001. How Democratic is the American Constitution?New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davenport, Christian. 2007. State Repression and the Domestic Democratic Peace. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidson, Julia O'Connell. 1998. Prostitution, Power and Freedom. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Devigne, Robert. 2006. Reforming Liberalism: J.S. Mill's Use of Ancient, Religious, Liberal, and Romantic Moralities. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Devlin, Lord Patrick. 1971 [1965]. “Morals and the Criminal Law; Hart.” In Morality and the Law (Wasserstrom, Richard, ed.) Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Dobzhansky, T. 1955. Evolution, Genetics, and Man. New York: Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Duncan, Richard F. 2005. “Free Exercise and Individualized Exemptions: Herein of Smith, Sherbert, Hogwarts, and Religious Liberty.” 83 Nebraska Law Review1178.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Andrea. 1981. Pornography: Men Possessing Women. New York: Pedigree.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1978. Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald 1984. “Rights as Trumps.” In Theories of Rights (Waldron, Jeremy, ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1985. A Matter of Principle. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1986. Law's Empire. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Dworkin, Ronald. 1993. Life's Dominion: An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual Freedom. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Dyzenhaus, David. 1997. “John Stuart Mill and the Harm of Pornography.” In Mill's On Liberty: Critical Essays (Dworkin, Gerald, ed.) Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, Melvin A. 2002. “Symposium: A Tribute to Professor Joseph M. Perillo, The Duty to Rescue in Contract Law.” 71 Fordham Law Review647.Google Scholar
Eisgruber, Christopher and Sager, Lawrence G.. 2007. Religious Freedom and the Constitution. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, James W. 2005. “‘Poor Relation’ Once More: The Supreme Court and the Vanishing Rights of Property Owners.” Cato Supreme Court Review (Moller, Mark K., ed.) Washington, D.C.: Cato Institute.Google Scholar
Ely, John. 1973. “The Wages of Crying Wolf: A Comment on Roe v. Wade.” 82 Yale Law Journal920.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ely, John. 1980. Democracy and Distrust: A Theory of Judicial Review. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Employment Division, Dept. of Human Resources v. Smith, 494 U.S. 872 (1990).
Engels, Friedrich. 1942 [1884]. Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State. New York: International Press.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1988. “The Mistakes of 1937.” 11 George Mason University of Law Review5.Google Scholar
Epstein, Richard A. 1995. Cases and Materials on Torts. 6th edn. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Ericcson, Lars O. 1980. “Charges against Prostitution: An Attempt at a Philosophical Assessment.” Ethics (90): 335–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnsworth, E. Allan. 1999. Contracts. 3rd edn. New York: Aspen.Google Scholar
Farrell, Robert C. 1999. “Successful Rational Basis Claims in the Supreme Court from the 1971 Term Through Romer v. Evans.” 32 Indiana Law Review357.Google Scholar
Federalist Papers. 1961 [1788]. (Cooke, Jacob E., ed.) Hanover, N.H.: Wesleyan Press.
Feinberg, Joel. 1988. The Moral Limits of the Criminal Law. Vols. 1–4. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Finnis, John. 1994. “Law, Morality, and ‘Sexual Orientation’.” 69 Notre Dame Law Review1049.Google Scholar
Fishkin, James S. 1983. “Can There Be a Neutral Theory of Justice?” Ethics 93(2) (January): 348–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flathman, Richard E. 1983. “Egalitarian Blood and Skeptical Turnips.” Ethics 93(2) (January): 357–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Paul. 1990a. “Michael Oakeshott as Liberal Theorist.” Political Theory 18(3): 411–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franco, Paul. 1990b. The Political Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fraser, Nancy. 1997. Justice Interruptus: Critical Reflections on the “Postsocialist” Condition. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Galston, William. 1991. Liberal Purposes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, Gerald F. 1996. Justificatory Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaventa, John. 1980. Power and Powerlessness. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
George, Robert P. 1993. Making Men Moral: Civil Liberties and Public Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gerencser, Steven A. 1995. “Voices in Conversation: Philosophy and Politics in the Work of Michael Oakeshott.” The Journal of Politics 57(3): 724–742.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilroy, Paul. 1993. The Black Atlantic: Modernity and Double Consciousness. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ginsburg, Douglas H. 1995. “Delegation Running Riot,” Regulation No. 1 (reviewing David Schoenbrod, Power Without Responsibility: How Congress Abuses the People Through Delegation (1993)).
Ginsburg, Ruth Bader. 1992. “Speaking in a judicial voice.” 67 New York University Law Review1185–1209 (December).Google Scholar
Glasser, Charles J. (ed.). 2006. International Libel & Privacy Handbook: A Global Reference for Journalists, Publishers, Webmasters and Lawyers. New York: Bloomberg Press.
Glendon, Mary Ann. 1993. Rights Talk: The Impoverishment of Political Discourse. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Suzanne B. 2004a. “Equality Without Tiers.” 77 Southern California Law Review481.Google Scholar
Goldberg, Suzanne B. 2004b. “Morals-Based Justifications for Lawmaking Before and After Lawrence v. Texas.” 88 Minnesota Law Review1233.Google Scholar
Goldman, Jeffrey M. 2005. “Protecting Gays from the Government's Crosshairs: a Reevaluation of the Ninth Circuit's Treatment of Gays under the Federal Constitution's Equal Protection Clause following Lawrence v. Texas.” 39 University of San Francisco Law Review617.Google Scholar
Gould, Stephen. 1981. The Mismeasure of Man. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Grant, Robert. 1990. Oakeshott. London: Claridge Press.Google Scholar
Gray, John. 1983. Mill on Liberty: A Defense. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunther, Gerald. 1972. “Foreword: In Search of Evolving Doctrine on a Changing Court: A Model for A Newer Equal Protection.” 86 Harvard Law Review1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutmann, Amy. 1985. “Communitarian Critics of Liberalism.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 308–322.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1990. Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action (Lenhardt, and Nicholsen, , trans.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy (Rehg, William, trans.) Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 2001. “Remarks on Legitimation through Human Rights.” The Postnational Constellation: Political Essays (Pensky, Max, trans. and ed.) Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Stuart. 1992. “New ethnicities.” In ‘Race’, Culture and Difference (Donald, James and Rattansi, Ali, eds.) London: Sage.Google Scholar
Harcourt, Bernard. 1999. “The Collapse of the Harm Principle.” Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology, Vol. 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1994 [1961]. The Concept of Law. 2nd edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Hayward, Clarissa. 2000. Defacing Power. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, S. E., Fitzpatrick, D. F., Hartmann, K., Quaife, M. A., Stratbucker, R. A., and Graber, B.. 1988. “Brain structure and function in sexual molesters of children and adolescents.” Journal of Clinical Psychiatry (March) 49(3): 108–112.Google ScholarPubMed
Holmes, Stephen. 1997. Passions and Constraints: On the Theory of Liberal Democracy. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
,Human Rights Campaign. Statewide Marriage Laws (2005): www.hrc.org/Template.cfm?Section=Center&CONTENTID=28225&TEMPLATE=/ContentManagement/ContentDisplay.cfm
Hutchinson, Darren Lenard. 2003. “Unexplainable on Grounds Other Than Race, The Inversion of Privilege and Subordination in Equal Protection Jurisprudence.” 2003 University of Illinois Law Review615.Google Scholar
Jaggar, Alison. 1980. “Prostitution.” In The Philosophy of Sex (Soble, Alan, ed.) Totowa: Rowman & Littlefield, pp. 353–358.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 1990. Anticlimax: A Feminist Perspective on the Sexual Revolution. New York: NYU Press.Google Scholar
Jeffreys, Sheila. 1997. The Idea of Prostitution. Melbourne, Australia: Spinifex.Google Scholar
KalvenJr., Harry. 1960. “The Metaphysics of the Law of Obscenity.” 1960 Supreme Court Review 1: 1–45.Google Scholar
Koppelman, Andrew. 1990. “Forced Labor: A Thirteenth Amendment Defense of Abortion.” 84 Northwestern University Law Review480.Google ScholarPubMed
Kramer, Matthew H., Simmonds, N. E., and Steiner, Hillel. 1998. A Debate Over Rights: Philosophical Enquiries. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Kukathas, Chandran. 2003. The Liberal Archipelago: A Theory of Diversity and Freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kymlicka, Will. 1995. Multicultural Citizenship. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Larmore, Charles E. 1987. Patterns of Moral Complexity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larmore, Chares. 1996. The Morals of Modernity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewontin, Richard. 1997. Critical Race Theory: Essays on the Social Construction and Reproduction of Race (Gates, E. Nathaniel, ed.) Vol. 1. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Livingstone, Frank. 1962. “On the Non-Existence of Human Races.” 3 Current Anthropology279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1988 [1690]. Second Treatise of Government (Laslett, Peter, ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 2003 [1689]. Letter Concerning Toleration in Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (Shapiro, Ian, ed.) New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Lukes, Steven. 1982. “Of Gods and Demons: Habermas and Practical Reason.” In Habermas: Critical Debates (Thompson, John B. and Held, David, eds.) Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lyons, David. 1994. Rights, Welfare, and Mill's Moral Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacDonald, Margaret. 1984. “Natural Rights.” In Theories of Rights (Waldron, Jeremy, ed.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Macedo, Stephen. 1995. “Homosexuality and the Conservative Mind.” 84 Georgetown Law Journal261.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1984. After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory. 2nd edn. Notre Dame, Ind.: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Mackie, J. L. 1977. Ethics: Inventing Right and Wrong. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Alasdair. 1988. Whose Justice? Which Rationality?Notre Dame: Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1987. Feminism Unmodified: Discourses on Life and Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
MacKinnon, Catharine A. 1989. Toward a Feminist Theory of the State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mapel, David R. 1990. “Civil Association and the Idea of Contingency.” Political Theory 18(3): 392–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1994 [1891]. Selected Writings. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
McClain, Linda C. 1995. “Inviolability and Privacy: the Castle, the Sanctuary, and the Body.” 7 Yale Journal of Law and the Humanities. Winter.Google Scholar
McConnell, Michael W. 1997. “The Importance of Humility in Judicial Review: A Comment on Ronald Dworkin's ‘Moral Reading’ of the Constitution.” 65 Fordham Law Review1269.Google Scholar
McGuigan, Patrick B. and Weyrich, Dawn M.. 1990. Ninth Justice: The Fight for Bork. Washington, D.C.: Free Congress Research and Education Foundation (University Press of America).Google Scholar
McLeod, W. H. 1989. Who is a Sikh? The Problem of Sikh Identity. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
McMahon, Christopher. 2000. “Discourse and Morality.” Ethics 110 (April): 514–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meiklejohn, Alexander. 1948. Free Speech and its Relation to Self-Government. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
Merriam-Webster Online. www.merriam-webster.com
Michelman, Frank. 1988. “Law's Republic.” Yale Law Journal 97(8): 1493–1537.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1979 [1861]. Utilitarianism (Sher, George, ed.) Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1989 [1859]. On Liberty (Collini, Stefan, ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. 1989 [1869]. The Subjection of Women (Collini, Stefan, ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
,Minnesota Statutes Annotated (M.S.A.) 2001. §.604A.01: Good Samaritan Law.
Montagu, A. 1997. Man's Most Dangerous Myth. 6th edn. Walnut Creek, Calif.: Altamira Press.Google Scholar
Munoz, Vincent Phillip. 2003. “James Madison's Principle of Religious Liberty.” American Political Science Review 97(1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murray, John Courtney. 1993. Religious Liberty: Catholic Struggles with Pluralism. Louisville, Ky.: Knox Press.Google Scholar
Nemko, Amy H. 1998. “Single-Sex Public Education After VMI: The Case for Women's Schools.” 21 Harvard Women's Law Journal19.Google Scholar
Nozick, Robert. 1974. Anarchy, State, and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1962. “Rationalism in Politics.” In Rationalism in Politics. Indianapolis: Liberty Press.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1999. “Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (with respondents), (Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., eds.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Oxford English Dictionary Online. www.oed.com
Parekh, Bhikhu C. 2000. Rethinking Multiculturalism: Cultural Diversity and Political Theory. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Parijs, Philippe van. 1995. Real Freedom for All. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
,Partial Birth Abortion Act of 2003, 18 U.S.C. § 1531.
Pascoe, Peggy. 1996. “Miscegenation Law, Court Cases, and Ideologies of ‘Race’ in Twentieth Century America.” The Journal of American History, 83(1): 44–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pateman, Carole. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Oxford: Polity Press.Google Scholar
Pettit, Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Plant, Raymond. 1972. “Social Thought.” In The Twentieth-Century Mind 1918–1945 (Cox, C. B. and Dyson, A. E., eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Poe, S. and Tate, C. N.. 1994. “Repression of Human-Rights to Personal Integrity in the 1980s – A Global Analysis.” American Political Science Review 88(4): 853–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Posner, Richard. 1992. Sex and Reason. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Quinton, Anthony. 1978. The Politics of Imperfection. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Radin, Margaret Jane. 1987. “Market-Inalienability.” 100 Harvard Law Review1849.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raine, Adrian, Meloy, J. Reid, Bihrle, Susan, Stoddard, Jackie, LaCasse, Lori, and Buchsbaum, Monte. 1998. “Reduced Prefrontal and Increased Subcortical Brain Functioning Assessed Using Positron Emission Tomography, Predatory and Affective Murderers.” Behavioral Sciences and the Law 16: 319–322.3.0.CO;2-G>CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rawls, John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Revised edn. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, John. 1996. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rees, J. C. 1966. “A Re-Reading of Mill on Liberty.” In Limits of Liberty: Studies of Mill's On Liberty (Radcliff, Peter, ed.) Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth Publishing.Google Scholar
Regan, Donald H. 1979. “Rewriting Roe v. Wade.” 77 Michigan Law Review1569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rehg, William. 1991. “Discourse and the Moral Point of View: Deriving a Dialogical Principle of Universalization.” Inquiry 34: 27–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
,Religious Freedom, Restoration of Act (RFRA) of 1993, H.R. 1308.
,The Restatement of Contracts (Second). 1981: §§ 346, 359–369.
,The Restatement (Second) of Torts. 1965: § 314.
,The Restatement (Second) of Torts. 1979: § 895F.
Rockefeller, Steven. C. 1994. “Comment” on Taylor's The Politics of Recognition. In Multiculturalism (Gutmann, Amy, ed.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Roper v. Simmons. 543 U.S. 551 (2005).
Rubenfeld, Jed. 1989. “The Right to Privacy.” 102 Harvard Law Review737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 1997. “Affirmative Action.” 107 Yale Law Journal427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubenfeld, Jed. 2005. Revolution by Judiciary: The Structure of American Constitutional Law. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1982. Liberalism and the Limits of Justice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1984. “The Procedural Republic and the Unencumbered Self.” Political Theory 12(1): 81–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandel, Michael. 1996. Democracy's Discontent: America in Search of a Public Philosophy. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Saks, Michael J. 1998. “Merlin and Solomon: Lessons from the Law's Formative Encounters with Forensic Identification Evidence.” 49 Hastings Law Journal1069.Google Scholar
Scalia, Antonin. 1997. A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Scanlon, T. M. 1998. What We Owe to Each Other. Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 1979. “Speech and ‘Speech’ – Obscenity and ‘Obscenity’: An Exercise in the Interpretation of Constitutional Language.” 67 Georgetown Law Journal899.Google Scholar
Schauer, Frederick. 2003. Profiles, Probabilities, and Stereotypes. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Scheffler, Samuel (ed.). 1998. Consequentialism and its Critics. Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Schneiders, Sandra M. 2004. Beyond Patching: Faith and Feminism in the Catholic Church. Revised edn. New York: Paulist Press.Google Scholar
Shachar, Ayelet. 2001. Multicultural Jurisdictions: Cultural Difference and Women's Rights. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1986. The Evolution of Rights in Liberal Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 1999. Democratic Justice. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2001. Abortion: The Supreme Court Decisions 1965–2000 (ed.) Introduction. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003a. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003b. “John Locke's Democratic Theory.” In Two Treatises of Government and A Letter Concerning Toleration (Shapiro, Ian, ed.) New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Ian. 2003c. The Moral Foundations of Politics. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Siegel, Reva B. 2005. What Roe v. Wade Should have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision (Balkin, Jack M., ed.) New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Siegan, Bernard H. 1980. Economic Liberties and the Constitution. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Skinner, Quentin. 1997. Liberty before Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skipper, Robert. 1997. “Mill and Pornography.” In Mill's On Liberty: Critical Essays (Dworkin, Gerald, ed.) Lanham, Md.: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Stein, Edward. 2001. The Mismeasure of Desire: The Science, Theory, and Ethics of Sexual Orientation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Steinberger, Peter J. 2000. “The Impossibility of a ‘Political’ Conception.” The Journal of Politics 62(1) (February): 147–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stoney, David. 2005 “Fingerprint Identifications.” In Modern Scientific Evidence: The Law and Science of Expert Testimony, Vol. 4 § 34 (Faigman, David L.et al., eds.) St. Paul, Minn.: West Group.Google Scholar
Sullivan, Kathleen M. and Gunter, Gerald (eds.) 2001. Constitutional Law. 14th edn. New York: Foundation Press.
Sunstein, Cass R. 1999. “Should Sex Equality Law Apply to Religious Institutions?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (with respondents), (Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., eds.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1992 [1979]. “Atomism.” In Communitarianism and Individualism (Aviner, Shlomo and De-Shalit, Avner, eds.) Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1994. “The Politics of Recognition.” In Multiculturalism (Gutmann, Amy, ed.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Ten, C. L. 1980. Mill on Liberty. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith Jarvis. 1971. “A Defense of Abortion.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 1(1): 47–66.Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith. 1975. “The Right to Privacy.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 4: 295–314.Google Scholar
Thompson, Judith Jarvis. 1976. “Killing, Letting Die, and the Trolley Problem.” 59 The Monist: 204–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Title VII, 42 U.S.C. 2000e-1(a).
Tocqueville, Alexis de. 2000 [1835, 1840]. Democracy in America (Vols. 1 and 2) (Mansfield, Harvey C. and Winthrop, Delba, eds. and trans.) Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tribe, Laurence. 1988. American Constitutional Law. 2nd edn. New York: Foundation Press.Google Scholar
Tribe, Laurence and Dorf, Michael C.. 1990. “Levels of Generality in the Definition of Rights.” University of Chicago Law Review 57(4) (Fall): 1057–1108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turkington, Richard C. and Allen, Anita L.. 2002. Privacy Law: Cases and Materials. 2nd edn. St. Paul, Minn.: West Group.Google Scholar
Tushnet, Mark. 2001. “The Redundant Free Exercise Clause.” 33 Loyola University Chicago Law Journal71.Google Scholar
Unger, Roberto Mangabeira. 1996. What Should Legal Analysis Become?London: Verso.Google Scholar
,UNESCO. Statement on the Nature of Race and Race Differences by Physical Anthropologists and Geneticists – June 1951.
Urbinati, Nadia. 2002. Mill on Democracy: From the Athenian Polis to Representative Government. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
,Vermont Statutes Annotated (V.S.A). 1968. 12 § 519: Emergency Medical Care.
Waldron, Jeremy. 1985. “What is Private Property?Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 5(3). 313–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1987. “Mill and the Value of Moral Distress.” Political Studies XXXV, 410–423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 1999. Law and Disagreement. Oxford: Clarendon Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, Jeremy. 2007. “Mill on Liberty and on the Contagious Diseases Acts.” In J. S. Mill's Political Thought: A Bicentennial Reassessment (Urbinati, Nadia and Zakaras, Alex, eds.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walston, Roderick E. 2001. “The Constitution and Property: Due Process, Regulatory Takings, and Judicial Takings.” 2001 Utah Law Review379.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Warren, Samuel D. and Brandeis, Louis D.. 1890. “The Right to Privacy.” 4 Harvard Law Review193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
West, Robin. 1992. “Reconstructing Liberty.” 59 Tennessee Law Review441.Google Scholar
West, Robin. 2005. What Roe v. Wade Should have Said: The Nation's Top Legal Experts Rewrite America's Most Controversial Decision (Balkin, Jack M., ed.) New York: New York Press.Google Scholar
Whittington, Keith E. 1999. Constitutional Interpretations: Textual Meaning, Original Intent, and Judicial Review. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.Google Scholar
Williams, Bernard. 1983. “Space Talk: The Conversation Continued.” Ethics 93(2) (January): 367–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winkler, Adam. 2006. “Fatal in Theory and Strict in Fact: An Empirical Analysis of Strict Scrutiny in the Federal Courts.” 59 Vanderbilt Law Review793.Google Scholar
Wolgast, Elizabeth H. 1994. “The Demands of Public Reason.” Columbia Law Review 94(6) (October).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wollheim, Richard. 1973. “John Stuart Mill and the Limits of State Action.” Social Research 7: 1–30.Google Scholar
Wollheim, Richard 1975. (ed.) Introduction, John Stuart Mill: Three Essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Wood, Gordon. 1969. The Creation of the American Republic, 1776–1787. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Percy, Nobrega, Jose, Langevin, Ron, and Wortzman, George. 1990. “Brain Density and Symmetry in Pedophilic and Sexually Aggressive Offenders.” Annals of Sex Research 3: 319–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azizah, Y. al-Hibri. 1999. “Is Western Patriarchal Feminism Good for Third World/Minority Women?” In Is Multiculturalism Bad for Women? (with respondents), (Cohen, Joshua, Howard, Matthew, and Nussbaum, Martha C., eds.) Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 1990. Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Bibliography
  • Sonu Bedi, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book: Rejecting Rights
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576263.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Bibliography
  • Sonu Bedi, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book: Rejecting Rights
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576263.011
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Bibliography
  • Sonu Bedi, Dartmouth College, New Hampshire
  • Book: Rejecting Rights
  • Online publication: 01 July 2009
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511576263.011
Available formats
×