Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-77c89778f8-swr86 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-17T21:47:47.023Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

10 - Monitoring the quality of long-term care in Finland

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 February 2014

Harriet Finne-Soveri
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki
Teija Hammar
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki
Anja Noro
Affiliation:
National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki
Sari Anttila
Affiliation:
National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (Valvira), Helsinki
Päivi Voutilainen
Affiliation:
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, Finland
Vincent Mor
Affiliation:
Brown University, Rhode Island
Tiziana Leone
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Anna Maresso
Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science
Get access

Summary

Setting the context

The constitution of Finland stipulates that society must guarantee adequate social, health and medical services for each of its 5.3 million inhabitants, and promote the health of the population. Due to decentralized governance, responsibility for financing long-term care for older people rests heavily on the shoulders of 336 relatively independent local authorities (municipalities), as does the delivery of long-term care services. Obliged by law to provide long-term care services for older dependent people, these municipalities are free either to provide services themselves or to purchase them from various for-profit or not-for-profit providers. Historically, municipalities have tended to rely on providing their own services.

According to the Statistical Yearbook on Social Welfare and Healthcare (National Institute for Health and Welfare, 2010), 87 per cent of all long-term care days in residential facilities were produced in public facilities, 10 per cent in not-for-profit private facilities and only 3 per cent in for-profit private facilities. In contrast, when it comes to sheltered housing for older people, officially known as ‘service houses’ or ‘sheltered housing’, only 42 per cent of long-term care days were furnished by public providers while the private sector provided 32 per cent of care days in not-for-profit facilities and 26 per cent in for-profit facilities. Chronic care hospitals, known as ‘health centres’, are predominantly public (95 per cent). Recent statistics are not available for home care. In all these types of facilities municipalities are responsible for monitoring care but they are aided in this task by other entities. The National Supervisory Authority for Welfare and Health (known as Valvira), supervised by the Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, undertakes a national supervisory role, together with six Regional State Administrative Agencies (AVI).

Type
Chapter
Information
Regulating Long-Term Care Quality
An International Comparison
, pp. 269 - 288
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2014

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Burrows, A. B., Morris, J. N., Simon, S. E., Hirdes, J. P. and Phillips, C. D. (2000). Development of an MDS-based Depression Rating Scale for use in nursing homes. Age and Ageing, 29: 165–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finne-Soveri, H., Hammar, T. and Noro, A. (2010). Measuring quality of long-term institutional care in Finland. Eurohealth, 16(2): 8–10.Google Scholar
Fries, B. E., Schneider, D. P., Foley, W. J., Gavazzi, M., Burke, R. and Cornelius, E. (1994). Refining a case-mix measure for nursing homes: Resource Utilization Groups (RUG-III). Medical care, 32(7): 668–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fries, B. E., Simon, S. E., Morris, J. N., Flodstrom, C. and Bookstein, F. L. (2001). Pain in US nursing homes: validating a pain scale for the minimum data set. The Gerontologist, 1(2): 173–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawes, C., Morris, J., Phillips, C. D., Fries, B. E., Murphy, K. and Mor, V. (1997). Development of the Nursing Home Resident Assessment Instrument in the USA. Age and Ageing, 26(2): 19–25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Fries, B. E., Morris, J. N., Ikegami, N., Zimmerman, D., Dalby, D. M., Aliaga, P., Hammer, S. and Jones, R. (2004). Home care quality indicators (HCQIs) based on the MDS-HC. Gerontologist, 44(5): 665–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hirdes, J. P., Frijters, D. H. and Teare, G. F. (2003). The MDS-CHESS Scale: A new measure to predict mortality in institutionalized older people. Journal of the American Geriatric Society, 51: 96–100.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ministry of Social Affairs and Health and Association of Finnish Local and Regional Authorities. (2008) National Framework for High Quality Services for Older People. Ministry of Social Affairs and Health, publication no. 5: 1–54.Google Scholar
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E., Mehr, D. R., Hawes, C., Phillips, C. D. and Mor, V. (1994). MDS Cognitive Performance Scale. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 49A(4): M174–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, J. N., Fries, B. E. and Morris, S. A. (1999). Scaling ADLs within the MDS. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 54A(11): M546–M553.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Welfare (2010). Statistical Yearbook on Social Welfare and Healthcare 2010. Helsinki: NIHW.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Welfare (2011). Statistical Yearbook on Social Welfare and Healthcare 2011. Helsinki: NIHW.Google Scholar
National Institute for Health and Welfare (2012). National RAI-database. THL. Available at: .
Sinervo, T., Noro, A., Tynkkynen, L.-K., Sulander, J., Taimio, H., Finne-Soveri, H., Lilja, R. and Syrjä, V. (2010). Yksityinen vai kunnallinen palveluasuminen? Kustannukset, asiakasrakenne, hoidon laatu ja henkilöstön hyvinvointi [Sheltered Housing – Private or Municipal? Costs, Clientele Structure, Quality of Care, and the Well-Being of Personnel]. Helsinki: National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL).Google Scholar
Valvira, (2010). Vanhusten ympärivuorokautisen sosiaalihuollon palvelut. Toimintayksiköihin tehdyn kyselyn tulokset ja valvonnan jatkotoimenpiteet [Twenty-four-hour-a-day Services for Older People in Nursing Homes and Service Houses. Results of a Survey and Further Actions]. Helsinki: Selvityksiä.Google Scholar
Zimmerman, D. R. and Karon, S. L. (1995). Developing and testing of nursing home quality indicators. Healthcare Financing Review, 16: 107–28.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×