Book contents
- Regime Support Beyond the Balance Sheet
- Regime Support Beyond the Balance Sheet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Conceptualizations and Existing Explanations of Regime Support
- 3 Participatory Opportunities, Efficacy, and Regime Support
- 4 Attitudinal Antecedents of Regime Support
- 5 Participatory Populism
- 6 The Other Liberalism
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
References
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 October 2017
Book contents
- Regime Support Beyond the Balance Sheet
- Regime Support Beyond the Balance Sheet
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Tables
- Acknowledgments
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Conceptualizations and Existing Explanations of Regime Support
- 3 Participatory Opportunities, Efficacy, and Regime Support
- 4 Attitudinal Antecedents of Regime Support
- 5 Participatory Populism
- 6 The Other Liberalism
- 7 Conclusion
- References
- Index
- References
Summary
A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Regime Support Beyond the Balance SheetParticipation and Policy Performance in Latin America, pp. 222 - 245Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2017
References
Acemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. (2006). The economic origins of dictatorship and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Adams, J. (2000). A defense of the Constitution of the United States of America. In Carey, G. W. (Ed.), The political writings of John Adams. Washington D.C.: Regnery Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Albert, M., & Hanhel, R. (1991). The political economy of participatory economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2009). Fixed effects regression models. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.Google Scholar
Allison, P. D. (2012). Handling missing data by maximum likelihood. SAS Global Forum 2012. Retrieved from www.statisticalhorizons.com/wp-content/uploads/MissingDataByML.pdf.Google Scholar
Almond, G., & Verba, S. (1963). The civic culture: Political attitudes and democracy in five nations. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Álvarez, R., & García-Guadilla, M. P. (2011). Contraloría social y clientelismo: la praxis de los consejos comunales en Venezuela. Politeia, 34(46), 175–207.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy: A cross-national analysis of consensus and majoritarian systems. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.Google Scholar
Anderson, C. J., & Singer, M. M. (2008). The sensitive left and the impervious right: Multilevel models and the politics of inequality, ideology, and legitimacy in Europe. Comparative Political Studies, 41(4/5), 564–599.Google Scholar
Angell, A. (2010). Democratic governance in Chile. In Mainwaring, S. & Scully, T. R. (Eds.), Democratic governance in Latin America (pp. 269–306). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Angyal, A. (1941). Foundations for a science of personality. New York, NY: The Commonwealth Fund.Google Scholar
Araujo, K. (2012, December 19). Telephone interview by author with Fondacomunal employee.Google Scholar
Armstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224.Google Scholar
Avritzer, L. (2002). Democracy in the public space in Latin America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Baland, J.-M., & Robinson, J. A. (2006). Land and power: Theory and evidence from Chile. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w12517.pdf.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215.Google Scholar
Barber, B. R. (1984). Strong democracy: Participatory politics for a new age. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Bélanger, É. (2004). Antipartyism and third-party vote choice: A comparison of Canada, Britain, and Australia. Comparative Political Studies, 37(9), 1054–1078.Google Scholar
Bellin, E. (2000). Contingent democrats: Industrialists, labor and democratization in late-developing countries. World Politics, 52(2), 175–205.Google Scholar
Biaocchi, G. (2001). Participation, activism, and politics: The Porto Alegre experiment and deliberative democratic theory. Politics and Society, 29(1), 43–72.Google Scholar
Bitar, S. (1986). Chile: Experiment in democracy (Vol. 6). Philadelphia, PA: Institute for the Study of Human Issues.Google Scholar
Boeninger, E. (1997). Democracia en Chile: Lecciones para la gobernabilidad. Santiago: Editorial Andres Bello.Google Scholar
Boix, C. (2006). The roots of democracy: Equality, inequality and the choice of political institutions. Policy Review, 135, 3–21.Google Scholar
Booth, J. A., & Seligson, M. (2009). The legitimacy puzzle: Political support and democracy in eight nations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2002). Democracy, institutions and attitudes about citizen influence on government. British Journal of Political Science, 32(2), 371–390.Google Scholar
Burbach, R., & Piñeiro, C. (2007). Venezuela’s participatory socialism. Journal of the Research Group on Socialism and Democracy Online, 21(3).Google Scholar
Campbell, A., Gurin, G., & Miller, W. E. (1954). The voter decides. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.Google Scholar
Canache, D. (2007). Chavismo and democracy in Venezuela. Paper presented at the Prospects for democracy in Latin America, University of North-Texas.Google Scholar
Canache, D., Mondak, J., & Seligson, M. (2001). Meaning and measurement in cross-national research on satisfaction with democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 65(4), 506–528.Google Scholar
Cannon, B. (2004). Venezuela, April 2002: Coup or popular rebellion? The myth of a united Venezuela. Bulletin of Latin American Research, 23(3), 285–302.Google Scholar
Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people! Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47(1), 2–16.Google Scholar
Cariola, C., & Miguel, L. (2005). Los bordes de la esperanza: nuevas formas de participación popular y gobiernos locales en la periferia de Caracas. Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 11(1), 21–41.Google Scholar
Caripa, B. (2012, October 11). Constructores trabajarán con consejos comunales: proyectan hacer un centro de convenciones en La Carlota. Últimas noticias. Retrieved from www.ultimasnoticias.com.ve/noticias/actualidad/economia/constructores-trabajaran-con-consejos-comunales.aspx.Google Scholar
Carlin, R. E. (2011). Distrusting democrats and political participation in new democracies: Lessons from Chile. Political Research Quarterly, 64(3), 668–687.Google Scholar
Carlin, R. E. (2014). What’s not to trust? Rubrics of political party trustworthiness in Chile and Argentina. Party Politics, 20(1), 63–77.Google Scholar
Carlin, R. E., Love, G. J., & Zechmeister, E. J. (2014). Natural disaster and democratic legitimacy: The public opinion consequences of Chile’s 2010 earthquake and tsunami. Political Research Quarterly, 67(1), 3–15.Google Scholar
Carlin, R. E., & Singer, M. M. (2011). Support for polyarchy in the Americas. Comparative Political Studies, 44(11), 1500–1526.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. R., & Nagel, E. (1934). An introduction to logic and the scientific method. New York, NY: Harcourt, Brace & World, Inc.Google Scholar
Collier, D., & Levitsky, S. (1997). Democracy with adjectives: Conceptual innovation in comparative research. World Politics, 49(3), 430–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collier, R. B., & Collier, D. (2002). Shaping the political arena. South Bend, IN: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Constable, P., & Valenzuela, A. (1991). A nation of enemies: Chile under Pinochet. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Coppedge, D. (1994). Strong parties and lame ducks: Presidential partyarchy and factionalism in Venezuela. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, J. (2010). The repeating revolution: Chávez’s new politics and old economics. In Weyland, K., Madrid, R., & Hunter, W. (Eds.), Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings (pp. 28–56). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corrales, J. (2011). Why polarize? Advantages and disadvantages of a rational-choice analysis of government-opposition relations under Hugo Chávez. In Ponniah, T. & Eastwood, J. (Eds.), The revolution in Venezuela: Social and political change under Chávez (pp. 67–98). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Corrales, J. (2014). Venezuela’s middle ground. Foreign Policy. Retrieved from http://foreignpolicy.com/2014/04/22/venezuelas-middle-ground.Google Scholar
Corrales, J., & Penfold, M. (2015). Dragon in the tropics: Venezuela and the legacy of Hugo Chávez (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
Craig, S. C., Niemi, R. G., & Silver, G. E. (1990). Political efficacy and trust: A report on the NES pilot study items. Political Behavior, 12(3), 289–314.Google Scholar
Crow, D. (2007). Citizen disenchantment in new democracies: The case of Mexico. (PhD Dissertation), University of Texas at Austin, Austin.Google Scholar
Crow, D. (2010). The party’s over: Citizen conceptions of democracy and political dissatisfaction in Mexico. Comparative Politics, 43(1), 41–61.Google Scholar
Crozier, M., Huntington, S., & Watanuki, J. (1975). The crisis of democracy. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and opposition. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Davis, L. (1964). The cost of realism: Contemporary restatements of democracy. Western Political Quarterly, 17(1), 37–46.Google Scholar
De la Torre, C. (2010). Populist seduction in Latin America (2nd ed.). Athens: Ohio University Center for International Studies.Google Scholar
de Tocqueville, A. (1990). Democracy in America (Vol. 44). Chicago: Encyclopedia Britannica.Google Scholar
DeCharms, R. (1968). Personal causation: The internal affective determinants of behavior. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105–115.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268.Google Scholar
Deci, E. L., Ryan, R. M., & Koestner, R. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.Google Scholar
Dettrey, B. J. (2013). Relative losses and economic voting: Sociotropic considerations or “keeping up with the Joneses”? Politics & Policy, 41(5), 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Difunden lista completa con 1500 ex agentes de la DINA que incluye a alcalde Cristián Labbé. (2012, April 13). Biobiochile.cl. Retrieved from www.biobiochile.cl/2012/04/13/difunden-lista-completa-con-1500-ex-agentes-de-la-dina-que-incluye-a-alcalde-cristian-labbe.shtml.Google Scholar
Donovan, T., Tolbert, C. J., & Smith, D. A. (2009). Political engagement, mobilization, and direct democracy. Public Opinion Quarterly, 73(1), 98–118.Google Scholar
Easton, D. (1975). A reassessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.Google Scholar
Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1967). The child’s acquisition of regime norms: Political efficacy. American Political Science Review, 61(1), 25–38.Google Scholar
Easton, D., & Dennis, J. (1969). Children in the political system: Origins of political legitimacy. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Eastwood, J. (2011). Introduction: The revolution in Venezuela. In Ponniah, T. & Easton, D. (Eds.), The revolution in Venezuela: Social and political change under Chávez (pp. 1–36). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Ellner, S. (2003a). Introduction: A search for explanations. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization and conflict (pp. 7–26). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Ellner, S. (2003b). Organized labor and the challenge of chavismo. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization and conflict (pp. 161–178). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Ellner, S. (2011). Venezuela’s social-based democratic model: innovations and limitations. Journal of Latin American Studies, 43(3), 421–449.Google Scholar
Encarnación, O. G. (2005). Do political pacts freeze democracy? Spanish and South American lessons. West European Politics, 28(1), 182–203.Google Scholar
Estudiantes del liceo Lastarria se reintegran mañana a clases. (2006, October 23). La Nación. Retrieved from www.lanacion.cl/prontus_noticias/site/artic/20061023/pags/20061023183443.html.Google Scholar
Finkel, S. E. (1987). The effects of participation on political efficacy and political support: Evidence from a West German panel. Journal of Politics, 49(2), 441–464.Google Scholar
Finkel, S. E., Muller, E. N., & Seligson, M. (1989). Economic crisis, incumbent performance and regime support: A comparison of longitudinal data from West Germany and Costa Rica. British Journal of Political Science, 19(3), 329–351.Google Scholar
Folger, R., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). Fairness theory: Justice as accountability. In Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 1–55). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Fontaine Aldunate, A. (1988). Los economistas y el presidente Pinochet. Santiago: Zig-Zag.Google Scholar
Foxley, A. (1983). Latin American experiments in neoconservative economics. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Frey, B. S., Benz, M., & Stutzer, A. (2004). Introducing procedural utility: Not only what, but also how matters. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 160(3), 377–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
García-Guadilla, M. P. (2003). Civil Society: Institutionalization, fragmentation, autonomy. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization, and conflict (pp. 179–196). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
García-Guadilla, M. P. (2008). La praxis de los consejos comunales en Venezuela: ¿Poder popular o instancia clientelar? Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 14(1), 125–151.Google Scholar
García-Guadilla, M. P. (2011). Urban Land Committees: Co-optation, autonomy and protagonism. In Smilde, D. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy (pp. 80–103). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
García-Guadilla, M. P. (2013) E-mail interview by author with Universidad de Simón Bolivar professor.Google Scholar
Garretón, M. A. (1989a). The Chilean political process (Kellum, S. & Merkx, G. W., Trans.). Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Garretón, M. A. (2003). Incomplete democracy. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Germani, G. (1978). Authoritarianism, facism, and national populism. New Brunswick: Transaction Books.Google Scholar
Greene, K. F. (2009). Why dominant parties lose: Mexico’s democratization in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Handlin, S. (2012). Social protection and the politicization of class cleavages during Latin America’s left turn. Comparative Political Studies, 46(12), 1582–1609.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2000). The public trust? In Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 31–51). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hardin, R. (2002). Trust and trustworthiness (Vol. 4). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A. (2009). Is Chávez populist? Measuring populist discourse in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 42(8), 1040–1067.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A., & Hansen, D. R. (2006). Dependent Civil Society: The Circulos Bolivarianos in Venezuela. Latin American Research Review, 41(1), 102–132.Google Scholar
Hawkins, K. A., Rosas, G., & Johnson, M. E. (2011). The misiones of the Chávez government. In Smilde, D. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics and culture under Chávez (pp. 186–218). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Held, D. (2007). Models of democracy (3rd ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hellinger, D. (1978). Electoral change in the Chilean countryside: The Presidential elections of 1958 and 1970. Western Political Quarterly, 31(2), 253–273.Google Scholar
Hellinger, D. (2003). Political overview: The breakdown of puntofijismo and the rise of chavismo. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization, and conflict (pp. 27–54). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Hellinger, D. (2007). When “no” means “yes to revolution”: Electoral politics in Bolivarian Venezuela. In Ellner, S. & Tinker Salas, M. (Eds.), Venezuela: Hugo Chávez and the decline of an “exceptional democracy” (pp. 157–184). Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Hellinger, D. (2011). Defying the iron law of oligarchy I: how does “el pueblo” conceive democracy? In Smilde, D. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: participation, politics, and culture under Chávez (pp. 28–57). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2001). Process preferences and American politics: What the people want government to be. American Political Science Review, 95(1), 145–153.Google Scholar
Hibbing, J. R., & Theiss-Morse, E. (2002). Stealth democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Higley, J., & Burton, M. (2006). Elite foundations of liberal democracy. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Hillman, R. S. (2006). Intellectuals: An elite divided. In McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.), The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 115–129). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschman, A. O. (1970). Exit, voice, and loyalty: Response to decline in firms, organizations and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Holland, A. (2006). Venezuela’s Urban Land Committees and Participatory Democracy. Venezuelanalysis.com. Retrieved from http://venezuelanalysis.com/analysis/1611.Google Scholar
Hough, M., Jackson, J., & Bradford, B. (2013). Legitimacy, trust and compliance: an empirical test of procedural justice theory using the European Social Survey In Tankebe, J. & Liebling, A. (Eds.), Legitimacy and criminal justice: An international exploration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hox, J. (2010). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hu, L.-t., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1–55.Google Scholar
Huber, E., Pribble, J., & Stephens, J. (2010). The Chilean left in power: Achievements, failures, and omissions. In Weyland, K., Madrid, R., & Hunter, W. (Eds.), Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings (pp. 77–97). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hull, C. L. (1943). Principles of behavior: An introduction to behavior theory. New York, NY: Appleton-Century-Crofts.Google Scholar
Huntington, S. (1965). Political development and decay. World Politics, 17(3), 386–430.Google Scholar
Informe cabildos abril 2013, etapa 1: sueños, diagnósticos y propuestas. (2013). Retrieved from http://piensa.providencia.cl/images/documentos/03-informe-cabildos-sueos_-diagnosticos-y-propuestas.pdf.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R. (2003). How solid is mass support for democracy - and how can we measure it? PS: Political Science and Politics, 36(1), 51–57.Google Scholar
Inglehart, R., & Welzel, C. (2005). Modernization, cultural change, and democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, J. H., & Sarason, I. G. (1978). Life stress, depression and anxiety: Internal-external control as a moderator variable. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 22(3), 205–208.Google Scholar
Jones, B. (2009). Hugo! The Hugo Chávez story from mud hut to perpetual revolution (Kindle ed.). Hanover, NH: Steerforth Press.Google Scholar
Karl, T. L. (1987). Petroleum and political pacts: The transition to democracy in Venezuela. Latin American Research Review, 22(1), 63–94.Google Scholar
Kazin, M. (1998). The populist persuasion: An American history. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Kinder, D., & Kiewiet, D. R. (1981). Sociotropic politics: The American case. British Journal of Political Science, 11(2), 129–161.Google Scholar
Klein, A. G., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS Method. Psychometrika, 65(4), 457–474.Google Scholar
Klein, A. G., & Muthén, B. O. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42(4), 647–673.Google Scholar
Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Klingemann, H.-D. (1999). Mapping political support in the 1990s: A global analysis. In Norris, P. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 31–56). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Klosko, G., Muller, E. N., & Opp, K.-D. (1987). Rebellious collective action revisited. American Political Science Review, 81(2), 557–564.Google Scholar
Kölln, A.-K., Esaiasson, P., & Turper, S. (2013). External efficacy and perceived responsiveness – Same, same or different? Paper presented at the Election, Public Opinion and Parties Conference, Lancaster University, UK. Retrieved from www.lancaster.ac.uk/fass/events/epop2013/docs/External%20efficacy%20and%20responsiveness%201209.pdf.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. J. (2004a). The dilemmas of democracy in the open economy: Lessons from Latin America. World Politics, 56(2), 262–302.Google Scholar
Kurtz, M. J. (2004b). Free market democracy and the Chilean and Mexican countryside. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laclau, E. (2005). Populism: What’s in a name? In Panizza, F. (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 32–49). New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Lane, R. E. (1962). Political ideology: Why the American common man believes what he does. New York, NY: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Lapp, N. D. (2004). Landing votes: Representation and land reform in Latin America: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
Latinobarómetro. (2008). Latinobarómetro annual polls, 1995–2008. Retrieved from www.latinobarometro.org/latContents.jsp.Google Scholar
Levi, M., & Sacks, A. (2009). Legitimating beliefs: Sources and indicators. Regulation & Governance, 3, 311–333.Google Scholar
Levi, M., Sacks, A., & Tyler, T. (2009). Conceptualizing legitimacy, measuring legitimating beliefs. American Behavioral Scientist, 53, 354–375.Google Scholar
Lewis-Beck, M. S. (1985). Pocketbook voting in U.S. National Election Studies: Fact or artifact? American Journal of Political Science, 29(2), 348–356.Google Scholar
Ley orgánica constitucional de municipalidades, Biblioteca del Congreso Nacional de Chile, Pub. L. No. 18.695 (2006, May 9).Google Scholar
Ley orgánica de los consejos comunales, (2006).Google Scholar
Ley orgánica de los consejos comunales, (2009).Google Scholar
Lichbach, M. (1995). The rebel’s dilemma. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Liendro, F. (2012a, October 22). E-mail communication by author with comite de viviende de Francisco de Miranda member.Google Scholar
Liendro, F. (2012b, October 27). Interview by author with member of el comite de viviende de Francisco de MirandaGoogle Scholar
Lind, E. A. (2001). Fairness heuristic theory: Justice judgments as pivotal cognitions in organizational relations. In Greenberg, J. & Cropanzano, R. (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice (pp. 56–88). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., Kray, L., & Thompson, L. (2001). Primacy effects in justice judgments: testing predictions from fairness heuristic theory. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 85(2), 189–210.Google Scholar
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator in comparative politics. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M. (1963). Political man: The social bases of politics. Garden City: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Lipset, S. M., & Schneider, W. (1983). The decline of confidence in American institutions. Political Science Quarterly, 98(3), 379–402.Google Scholar
López Maya, M. (1997). The rise of Causa R in Venezuela. In Chalmers, D. A., Vilas, C. M., Hite, K., Martin, S. B., Piester, K., & Segarra, M. (Eds.), The new politics of inequality in Latin America: Rethinking participation and representation (pp. 117–143). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
López Maya, M. (1999a). La protesta venezolana entre 1989 y 1993 (en un umbral del neolibralismo). In Maya, M. López (Ed.), Lucha popular, democracia, neoliberalismo: protesta popular en América Latina en los años de ajuste (pp. 211–238). Caracas: Editorial Nueva Sociedad.Google Scholar
López Maya, M. (1999b). Venezuela: la rebelión popular del 27 de febrero de 1989: ¿Resistencia a la modernidad? Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 5(2–3), 177–200.Google Scholar
Lòpez Maya, M. (2001). Venezuela después del Caracazo: Formas de la protesta en un contexto desinstitucionalizado. Kellog Institution. Retrieved from www.kellogginstitute.org/sites/www.kellogginstitute.org/files/documents/287.pdf.Google Scholar
López Maya, M. (2003). Hugo Chávez Frías: His movement and his presidency. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization and conflict (pp. 73–92). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Lòpez Maya, M. (2003). The Venezuelan Caracazo of 1989: Popular protest and institutional weakness. Journal of Latin American Studies, 35(1), 117–137.Google Scholar
López Maya, M., & Lander, L. E. (2011). Participatory democracy in Venezuela: Origins, ideas, and implementation. In Hellinger, D. & Smilde, D. (Eds.), Venezuela’s Bolivarian democracy: Participation, politics, and culture under Chávez (pp. 58–79). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
López Maya, M., & Panzarelli, A. (2013). Populism, renterism and socialism in twenty-first-century Venezuela. In de la Torre, C. & Arnson, C. J. (Eds.), Latin American populism in the twenty-first century (pp. 239–268). Washington, D.C.: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Loveman, B. (2001). Chile: The legacy of Hispanic capitalism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Lovera, A. (2008). Los consejos comunales en Venezuela: ¿Democracia participativa o delegativa? Revista Venezolana de Economía y Ciencias Sociales, 14(1), 107–124.Google Scholar
Luna, J. P. (2016). Chile’s crisis of representation. Journal of Democracy, 27(3), 129–138.Google Scholar
Machado, J. E. (2008). Estudio de los Consejos Comunales en Venezuela. Caracas: Centro Gumilla. Retrieved from http://gumilla.org/files/documents/Estudio-Consejos-Comunales01.pdf.Google Scholar
Machado, J. E. (2009). Estudio cuantitativo de opinión sobre los Consejos Comunales. Caracas: Centro Gumilla. Retrieved from www.civilisac.org/civilis/wp-content/uploads/estudio-cualitativo-de-consejos-comunales-gumilla-2009-1.pdf.Google Scholar
Macpherson, C. B. (1977). The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Madison, J. (1952). The Federalist Papers (Vol. 43). Chicago, IL: Encyclopedia Britannica, Inc.Google Scholar
Madrid, R., Hunter, W., & Weyland, K. (2010). The policies and performance of the contestory and moderate left. In Weyland, K., Madrid, R., & Hunter, W. (Eds.), Leftist governments in Latin America: Successes and shortcomings (pp. 140–180). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Madrid, R., & Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2016). Descriptive representation and regime support in Latin America. Political Studies, 64(4), 890–909. doi:10.1177/0032321715617772Google Scholar
Madsen, D. (1987). Political self-efficacy tested. American Political Science Review, 81(2), 571–582.Google Scholar
Madsen, D., & Snow, P. G. (1991). The charismatic bond: Political behavior in a time of crisis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., & Pérez-Liñán, A. (2013). Democracies and dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, survival and fall. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, S., Scully, T. R., & Vargas Cullell, J. (2010). Measuring success in democratic governance. In Mainwaring, S. & Scully, T. R. (Eds.), Democratic governance in Latin America (pp. 11–51). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
McAdam, D., & Tarrow, S. (2010). Ballots and barricades: On the reciprocal relations between elections and social movements. Perspectives on Politics, 8(2), 529–542.Google Scholar
McCoy, J. (2006). From representative to participatory democracy? In McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.), The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 263–296). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.) (2006). The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 263–296). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
McDonald, R. H. (1969). Apportionment and party politics in Santiago, Chile. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 13(3), 455–470.Google Scholar
McFarlin, D. B., & Sweeney, P. D. (1992). Distributive and procedural justice as predictors of satisfaction with personal and organizational outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 35(3), 626–637.Google Scholar
McFaul, M. (2002). The fourth wave of democracy and dictatorship: Noncooperative transitions in the postcommunist world. World Politics, 54(2), 212–244.Google Scholar
Michels, R. (2001). Political parties: A sociological study of the oligarchical tendencies of modern democracy (Paul, E. & Paul, C., Trans.). Kitchener, Ontario: Batoche Books.Google Scholar
Middlebrook, K. J. (1995). The paradox of revolution. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mill, J. S. (2009). Considerations on representative government. Auckland: The Floating Press.Google Scholar
Millar, R. (1981). La elección presidencial de 1920: Tendencias y prácticas políticas en el Chile parlamentario. Santiago: Editorial Universitaria.Google Scholar
Miller, A., & Listhaug, O. (1999). Political performance and institutional trust. In Norris, P. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 204–216). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Moehler, D. C. (2008). Distrusting democrats: Outcomes of participatory constitution making. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Molina, J. E. (2006). The unraveling of Venezuela’s party system: From party rule to personalistic politics and deinstitutionalization. In McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.), The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 152–180). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Mommer, B. (2003). Subversive oil. In Ellner, S. & Hellinger, D. (Eds.), Venezuelan politics in the Chávez era: Class, polarization and conflict (pp. 131–146). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
Mosca, G. (1939). The ruling class (Kahn, H. D., Trans.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mudde, C., & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (2013). Populism and (liberal) democracy: A framework for analysis. In Mudde, C. & Rovira Kaltwasser, C. (Eds.), Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or corrective for democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, E. N. (1970). The representation of citizens by political authorities: Consequences for regime support. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1149–1166.Google Scholar
Muller, E. N., & Opp, K.-D. (1986). Rational choice and rebellious collective action. American Political Science Review, 80(2), 471–488.Google Scholar
Muller, E. N., & Williams, C. J. (1980). Dynamics of political support-alienation. Comparative Political Studies, 13(1), 35–59.Google Scholar
Myers, D. (2006). The normalization of Punto Fijo democracy. In McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.), The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 11–32). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Navia, P. (2010). Living in actually existing democracies: Democracy to the extent possible in Chile. Latin American Research Review, 45, 298–328.Google Scholar
Newton, K., & Norris, P. (2000). Confidence in public institutions: Faith, culture or performance? In Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 52–73). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Niemi, R. G., Craig, S. C., & Mattei, F. (1991). Measuring internal political efficacy in the 1988 National Election Study. American Political Science Review, 85(4), 1407–1413.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (1999a). Institutional explanations for political support. In Norris, P. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 217–235). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Norris, P. (1999b). Introduction: The growth of critical citizens. In Norris, P. (Ed.), Critical citizens: Global support for democratic governance (pp. 1–30). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
O’Brien, R. (1994). Identification of simple measuremnt models with multiple latent variables and correlated errors. Sociological Methodology, (24), 137–170.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, G. (1998). Horizontal accountability in new democracies. Journal of Democracy, 9(3), 112–126.Google Scholar
Opp, K.-D., Burow-Auffarth, K., & Heinrichs, U. (1981). Conditions for conventional and unconventional political participation: An empirical test of economic and sociological hypotheses. European Journal of Political Research, 9(2), 147–168.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, L. (2007). Politics in Chile: Socialism, authoritarianism and market democracy. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Orpen, C. (1994). The effects of self-esteem and personal control on the relationship between job insecurity and psychological well-being. Social Behavior and Personality, 22(1), 53–56.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, P. (1994). Understanding political change after authoritarian rule: The popular sectors and Chile’s new democratic regime. Journal of Latin American Studies, 26(3), 737–759.Google Scholar
Oxhorn, P. (1995). Organizing civil society: The popular sectors and the struggle for democracy in Chile. University Park, PA: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
Panizza, F. (2005). Introduction: Populism and the mirror of democracy. In Panizza, F. (Ed.), Populism and the mirror of democracy (pp. 1–31). New York, NY: Verso.Google Scholar
Pateman, C. (1970). Participation and democratic theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Pharr, S., Putnam, R. D., & Dalton, R. (2000). Introduction. In Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 3–20). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94(2), 251–267.Google Scholar
Pinto, A. (1996). Chile, un caso de desarrollo frustrado. Santiago: Editorial Universidad de Santiago.Google Scholar
Pitkin, H. F. (1967). The concept of representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Plamenatz, J. (1963). Man and society: Political and social theory, Machiavelli through Rousseau (Vol. 1). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Company, Inc.Google Scholar
Poguntke, T. (1996). Anti-party sentiment – conceptual thoughts and empirical evidence: Explorations into a minefield. European Journal of Political Research, 29(3), 319–344.Google Scholar
Polga-Hecimovich, J., & Siavelis, P. M. (2015). Here’s the bias! A (re-) reassessment of the Chilean electoral system. Electoral Studies, 40, 268–279.Google Scholar
Posner, P. W. (1999). Popular representation and political dissatisfaction in Chile’s new democracy. Journal of InterAmerican Studies and World Affairs, 41(1), 59–85.Google Scholar
Posner, P. W. (2004). Local democracy and the transformation of popular participation in Chile. Latin American Politics and Society, 46(3), 55–81.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1988). Democracy as a contingent outcome of conflict. In Elster, J. & Slagstad, R. (Eds.), Constitutionalism and democracy (pp. 59–80). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Przeworski, A. (1991). Democracy and the market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. D. (1995). Tuning in, tuning out. PS: Political Science and Politics, 24(8), 664–683.Google Scholar
Ramírez, C. V. (2005). Venezuela’s Bolivarian revolution: Who are the chavistas? Latin American Perspectives, 32(3), 79–97.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2012). Participation paradoxes: Voting, contention and support for democracy. Paper presented at the American Political Science Association Annual Meeting, New Orleans, LA. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2110012Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2014). Piensa Providencia program evaluation. Report prepared for Providencia Municipality.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2015). Participatory populism: Theory and evidence from Bolivarian Venezuela. Political Research Quarterly, 68(3), 415–427.Google Scholar
Rhodes-Purdy, M. (2017). Beyond the balance sheet: Performance, participation and regime support in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 49(2), 252–272.Google Scholar
Rihoux, B., & Ragin, C. (Eds.). (2009). Configurational comparative methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and related techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Riker, W. H. (1988). Liberalism against populism: A confrontation between the theory of democracy and the theory of social choice. San Francisco, CA: W.H. Freeman and Company.Google Scholar
Ripley, G. (2012, November 12) Interview by author with vocero from El Valle (comuna Galipan).Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (1998). Deepening democracy? The modern left and social movements in Chile and Peru (1st ed.). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, K. M. (2006). Populism, political conflict, and grass-roots organization in Latin America. Comparative Politics, 38(2), 127–148.Google Scholar
Rogowski, R. (1974). Rational legitimacy: A theory of political support. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Rosenblatt, F. (2013). How to party? Static and dynamic party survival in Latin American consolidated democracies. (PhD), Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1954). Social learning and clinical psychology. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Prentice-Hall, Inc.Google Scholar
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychological Mongraphs: General and Applied, 80(1), 1–28.Google Scholar
Rousseau, J.-J. (2002). The social contract. In Dunn, S. (Ed.), The social contract and the first and second discourses (pp. 149–256). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Rueschemeyer, D., Stephens, E., & Stephens, J. (1992). Capitalist development and democracy. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74(6), 1557–1586.Google Scholar
Santos, A. (2005). The Chilean dilemma: Between economic development and the deepening of democracy. Social Forces, 84(1), 1–21.Google Scholar
Sarsfield, R., & Echegaray, F. (2005). Opening the black box: How satisfaction with democracy and its perceived efficacy affect regime preference in Latin America. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 18(2), 153–173.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1984). In Sartori, G. (Ed.), Chapter 1. “Guidelines for concept analysis” Social science concepts: A systematic analysis (Vol. Guidelines for Concept Analysis, pp. 15–85). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited, part one: The contemporary debate. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
Schaffer, F. A. (2010). Thin descriptions: the limits of survey research on the meaning of democracy. Polity, 46(3), 303–330.Google Scholar
Schmitter, P. C., & O’Donnell, G. (1986). Transitions from authoritarian rule volume 4: Tenative conclusions about uncertain democracies. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (2008). Capitalism, socialism, and democacy (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Harper Perennial Modern Classics.Google Scholar
Scully, T. R. (1992). Rethinking the center: Party politics in the nineteenth-and twentieth-century Chile. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Siavelis, P. M. (2009). Elite-mass congruence, partidocracia and the quality of Chilean Democracy. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 3(1), 3–31.Google Scholar
Silva, P. (1991). Technocrats and politics in Chile: From the Chicago Boys to the CIEPLAN Monks. Journal of Latin American Studies, 23(2), 385–410.Google Scholar
Silva, P. (2008). In the name of reason: Technocrats and politics in Chile. University Park, PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Singh, S. P., & Carlin, R. E. (2015). Happy medium, happy citizens: Presidential power and democratic regime support. Political Research Quarterly, 68(1), 3–17.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1979). States and social revolutions: A comparative analysis of France, Russia, and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Skocpol, T. (1985). Bringing the state back in: strategies of analysis in current research. In Evans, P., Rueschemeyer, D., & Skocpol, T. (Eds.), Bringing the state back in (pp. 3–37). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spalding, H. A. J. (1977). Organized labor in Latin America. New York, NY: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Stallings, B. (1978). Class conflict and economic development in Chile, 1958–1973. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (1998). Power in movement: Social movements and contentious politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Tarrow, S. (2000). Mad cows and social activists: Contentious politics in the trilateral democracies. In Pharr, S. & Putnam, R. D. (Eds.), Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? (pp. 270–290). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
The Latin American Public Opinion Project (2012). Americas barometer Combined country datset (v1.5). Retrieved from http://datasets.americasbarometer.org/database-login/usersearch.php?merged=yes.Google Scholar
Thibaut, J., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological analysis. Hillsdale, N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Tie breaker: a new voting system should liven up politics. (2015, February 14). The Economist.Google Scholar
Triviño Salazar, J. C. (2013). The promise of transformation through participation: An analysis of Communal Councils in Caracas, Venezuela. Retrieved from http://repub.eur.nl/pub/39829.Google Scholar
Urbinati, N., & Warren, M. E. (2008). The concept of representation in contemporary democratic theory. Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 381–412.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1972). The scope of the Chilean party system. Comparative Politics, 4(2), 179–199.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, A. (1978). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Chile. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
van den Bos, K., Lind, E. A., & Wilke, H. A. M. (2001). The psychology of procedural and distributive justice viewed from the perspective of fairness heuristic theory. In Cropanzano, R. (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 49–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Velasco, A. (2015). Barrio rising: Urban popular politics and the making of modern Venezuela. Oakland, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
von Mettenheim, K. (1990). The Brazilian voter in democratic transition, 1974–1982. Comparative Politics, 23(1), 23–44.Google Scholar
von Mettenheim, K. (1995). The Brazilian voter: Mass politics in democratic transition, 1974–1986. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.Google Scholar
Walker, J. (2001). Control and the psychology of health: Theory, measurement and applications. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, M. (1978). The types of legitimate domination. In Roth, G. & Wittich, C. (Eds.), Economy & society (pp. 212–254). Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Weeks, G., & Borzutzky, S. (2012). Michelle Bachelet’s government: The paradoxes of a Chilean president. Journal of Politics in Latin America, 4(3), 97–121.Google Scholar
Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American Politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: The concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297–333.Google Scholar
Wiles, P. (1969). A syndrome, not a doctrine. In Ionescu, G. & Gellner, E. (Eds.), Populism: Its meaning and national characteristics (pp. 166–179). New York, NY: Macmillan Company.Google Scholar
Wilpert, G. (2005). Venezuela: Participatory democracy or government as usual? Socialism and Democracy, 19(1), 7–32. doi:10.1080/0885430042000338408Google Scholar
Wilpert, G. (2011). Venezuela’s experiment in participatory democracy. In Ponniah, T. & Eastwood, J. (Eds.), The revolution in Venezuela: Social and political change under Chávez (pp. 99–130). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Winn, P. (1986). Weavers of revolution: The Yarur workers and Chile’s road to socialism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press, USA.Google Scholar
Yepes, J. A. (2006). Public opinion, political socialization, and regime stabilization. In McCoy, J. & Myers, D. (Eds.), The unraveling of representative democracy in Venezuela (pp. 231–262). Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Zucco, C. (2006). Where’s the bias? A reassessment of the Chilean electoral system. Electoral Studies, 26(2), 303–314.Google Scholar