Cheng, A. “Wenhua zhiyuezhe renlei” (Culture Conditions Humanity), Wenyibao (Literary Gazette), July 9, 1985.Google Scholar

Alitto, Guy S. “The Conservative as Sage: Liang Shu-ming.” Pp. 213–41 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Alitto, Guy S., ed. Contemporary Confucianism in Thought and Action. Berlin: Springer, 2015.Google Scholar

Alitto, Guy S.. The Last Confucian: Liang Shu-ming and the Chinese Dilemma of Modernity. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1987 [1979].Google Scholar

Alitto, Guy S.. “Postmodernism,” lecture, Peking University, June 27, 2006.Google Scholar

Alitto, Guy S.. [Ai Kai]. Shijie fanwei nei de fan xiandaihua sichao: Lun wenhua shoucheng zhuyi (Anti-modernization Thought in the Global Spectrum: On Cultural Conservatism). Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe, 1991.Google Scholar

Ang, Ien. “Can One Say No to Chineseness? Pushing the Limits of the Diasporic Paradigm.” Pp. 281–300 in Chow, ed., Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Apter, David E. and Saich, Tony. Revolutionary Discourse in Mao’s Republic. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Arnhart, Larry. Darwinian Conservatism. Exeter, UK: Imprint Academic, 2005.Google Scholar

Baecker, Angie. “Max Weber in Twentieth-Century China,” unpublished conference paper, AAS-in-Asia, Taipei, June 23, 2015.Google Scholar

Baker, Keith Michael and Edelstein, Dan. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–24 in Baker, and Edelstein, , eds., Scripting Revolution: A Historical Approach to the Comparative Study of Revolutions. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. “History for the Masses.” Pp. 260–86 in Unger, Jonathan, ed., Using the Past to Serve the Present: Historiography and Politics in Contemporary China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1993.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. In the Red: On Contemporary Chinese Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. “The Revolution of Resistance.” Pp. 47–70 in Perry, Elizabeth J. and Selden, Mark, eds., Chinese Society: Change, Conflict and Resistance. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2003.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. Shades of Mao: The Posthumous Cult of the Great Leader. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. “To Screw Foreigners Is Patriotic: China’s Avant-Garde Nationalists,” China Journal, no. 34 (July 1995), 209–34.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie. “Worrying China and New Sinology,” China Heritage Quarterly 14 (June 2008), www.chinaheritagequarterly.org/articles.php?searchterm=014_worryingChina.inc&issue=014.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie and Jaivin, Linda, eds. New Ghosts, Old Dreams: Chinese Rebel Voices. New York: Times Books, 1992.Google Scholar

Barmé, Geremie and Minford, John, eds. Seeds of Fire: Chinese Voices of Conscience. New York: Noonday Press, 1989.Google Scholar

Barr, Michael D. “Lee Kuan Yew and the ‘Asian Values’ Debate,” Asian Studies Review 24.3 (2000), 309–34.Google Scholar

Baum, Richard. Burying Mao: Chinese Politics in the Age of Deng Xiaoping. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

“Be Firm Promoters of the Four Modernizations,” Renmin ribao editorial, February 1, 1980. Pp. 433–38 in James T. Myers, Jürgen Domes, and Milton Yeh, eds., Chinese Politics: Documents and Analysis, Vol. 3: The Death of Mao (1976) to the Fall of Hua Kuo-feng (1980). Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1995.Google Scholar

“Behind the CCP Princes Party,” Pai-hsing (The People), no. 260 (March 16, 1992), 32–35. Translated in Inside China Mainland (Taipei) 14.5 (May 1992), 6–10.Google Scholar

Beijing daxue shehui kexuechu (Peking University Social Sciences Department), ed. Beijing daxue jinian wusi yundong qishi zhounian lunwenji (Collection of Articles on the Occasion of Peking University’s Commemoration of the Seventieth Anniversary of the May Fourth Movement). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Béja, Jean-Philippe. “Introduction: 4 June 1989: A Watershed in Chinese Contemporary History.” Pp. 1–12 in Béja, , ed., The Impact of China’s 1989 Tiananmen Massacre. London: Routledge, 2011.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel. China’s New Confucianism: Politics and Everyday Life in a Changing Society. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Bell, Daniel. The Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism. New York: Basic Books, 1976.Google Scholar

Bellah, Robert N. Tokugawa Religion: The Values of Pre-industrial Japan. Glencoe, IL: Free Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Berger, Peter L. “An East Asian Development Model?” Pp. 3–11 in Berger, and Hsiao, Hsin-Huang Michael, eds., In Search of an East Asian Development Model. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1988.Google Scholar

Berlin, Isaiah. “Two Concepts of Liberty.” Pp. 118–72 in Berlin, Four Essays on Liberty. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Quanzhong, Bi. “Guoxue, zai yanyuan you qiaoran xingqi: Beijing daxue Zhongguo chuantong wenhua yanjiu sanji” (The Quiet Rise of National Studies on the Old Campus: Random Notes on Chinese Traditional Culture Research at Peking University), Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), August 16, 1993, 3.Google Scholar

Billioud, Sébastien. Thinking through Confucian Modernity: A Study of Mou Zongsan’s Moral Metaphysics. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Billioud, Sébastien and Thoraval, Joël. The Sage and the People: The Confucian Revival in China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

“Bixu qizhi xianming de fandui dongluan” (We Must Take a Firm Stand and Oppose Turmoil), Renmin ribao, April 26, 1989, 1.Google Scholar

Black, George and Munro, Robin. Black Hands of Beijing: Lives of Defiance in China’s Democracy Movement. New York: John Wiley, 1993.Google Scholar

Bloch, Ernst. “Nonsynchronism and Dialectics,” New German Critique, no. 11 (Spring 1977), 22–38.Google Scholar

Bresciani, Umberto. Reinventing Confucianism: The New Confucian Movement. Taipei: Ricci Institute for Chinese Studies, 2001.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy. “Profit and Righteousness in Chinese Economic Culture.” Pp. 27–44 in Brook, and Luong, Hy V., eds., Culture and Economy: The Shaping of Capitalism in Eastern Asia. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Brook, Timothy. Quelling the People: The Military Suppression of the Beijing Democracy Movement. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Brugger, Bill and Kelly, David. Chinese Marxism in the Post-Mao Era. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Burke, Edmund. Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Turner, Frank M.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Burke, Peter. Exiles and Expatriates in the History of Knowledge, 1500–2000. Waltham, MA: Brandeis University Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Cecil, Hugh. Conservatism. London: Williams and Norgate, 1912.Google Scholar

Chan, N. Serina. The Thought of Mou Zongsan. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Chang, Carsun. The Development of Neo-Confucian Thought, 2 vols. New York: Bookman Associates, 1957–62.Google Scholar

Chang, Hao [Zhang Hao]. “Intellectual Change and the Reform Movement, 1890–1898.” Pp. 274–338 in Fairbank, John King and Liu, Kwang-ching, eds., The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 11: Late Ch’ing, 1800–1911, Part Two. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1980.Google Scholar

Chang, Hao. “New Confucianism and the Intellectual Crisis of Contemporary China.” Pp. 276–302 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Chang, Hao. “Zhongguo jin bainian lai de geming sixiang daolu” (The Revolutionary Road of China during the Past One Hundred Years). Pp. 42–56 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Kaifang shidai (Open Times), no. 1 (1999), 2, 29–47.Google Scholar

Jiang, Chang. “Shehui zhuanxingqi de yizhong wenhua xianxiang: Ping Gaobie geming” (A Cultural Phenomenon in Societies at a Transitional Stage: On Farewell to Revolution), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 33 (February 1996), 68–71.Google Scholar

Cheek, Timothy. “Historians as Public Intellectuals in Contemporary China.” Pp. 204–22 in Gu, Edward and Goldman, Merle, eds., Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.Google Scholar

Cheek, Timothy. The Intellectual in Modern Chinese History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Cheek, Timothy. Living with Reform: China since 1989. London: Zed Books, 2006.Google Scholar

Cheek, Timothy. “The Worlds of China’s Intellectuals.” Pp. 154–72 in Weston, Timothy B. and Jensen, Lionel M., eds., China In and Beyond the Headlines. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2012.Google Scholar

Cheek, Timothy. “Xu Jilin and the Thought Work of China’s Public Intellectuals,” China Quarterly, no. 186 (June 2006), 401–20.Google Scholar

Baiming, Chen. “Jinnian lai guonei dui wenhua jijin zhuyi de pipan zongshu” (Summary of Mainland Criticism of Cultural Radicalism in Recent Years), Wenyi lilun yu piping (Literature and Art Theory and Criticism), no. 1 (April 1997), 131–41.Google Scholar

Duxiu, Chen. “Falanxi yu jindai wenming” (The French and Modern Civilizations), Xin qingnian (New Youth) 1.1 (September 1915), 1–4.Google Scholar

Duxiu, Chen. “Wenxue geminglun” (On the Literary Revolution). Pp. 164–67, reprinted in Chen Duxiu, Wang Zhongjiang, and Yuan Shuya, Xin qingnian: Minzhu yu kexue de huhuan (New Youth: The Call for Democracy and Science). Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Chen, Feng. “The Dilemmas of Eudaemonic Legitimacy in Post-Mao China,” Polity 29.3 (1997), 421–40.Google Scholar

Chen, Feng. “Order and Stability in Social Transition: Neoconservative Political Thought in Post-1989 China,” China Quarterly, no. 151 (1997), 593–613.Google Scholar

Feng, Chen and Zhong, Zhi. “Kua shiji zhi jiao: Wenxue de kunhuo yu xuanze” (Stepping into a New Century: Literature’s Puzzlement and Options). Pp. 219–30 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Wenxue pinglun (Literary Review), no. 6 (1994), 121–26, 34.Google Scholar

Chen, Fong-ching. “The Popular Cultural Movement of the 1980s.” Pp. 71–86 in Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns.Google Scholar

Chen, Fong-ching and Guantao, Jin. From Youthful Manuscripts to River Elegy: The Chinese Popular Cultural Movement and Political Transformation 1979–1989. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Chen, Jianhua. “World Revolution Knocking at the Heavenly Gate: Kang Youwei and His Use of Geming in 1898,” Journal of Modern Chinese History 5.1 (June 2011), 89–108.Google Scholar

Kuide, Chen. “Wangchao mori de ‘xinzheng’” (A Doomed Dynasty’s “New Deal”), Zhongguo zhi chun (China Spring), no. 1 (January 1992), 24–25. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.1 (March–April 1996), 38–41.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Bayu: Shiji zhi jiao hua chuantong” (Afterword: On Tradition at the End of the Century). Pp. 286–89 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. Chuantong yu xiandai: Renwen zhuyi de shijie (Tradition and Modernity: The Scope of Humanism). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 2006. A revised edition was published under the title Renwen zhuyi de shijie (The Scope of Humanism). Nanning: Guangxi jiaoyu chubanshe, 1997.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Dui xin wenhua yundong de zai sikao: Cong ‘wusi’ houqi de Liang Shuming shuoqi” (Reconsidering the New Culture Movement: On Liang Shuming in the Post-“May Fourth” Era), Nanchang daxue xuebao (Nanchang University Journal) 31.1 (January 2000), 1–5.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Duoyuan wenhua jiegou zhong de ruxue ji qi dingwei” (Confucianism and Its Place in Multicultural Structures), Zhongguo luntan (China Forum) 27.1 (1988), 21–23.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Ershi shiji wenhua yundong zhong de jijin zhuyi” (Radicalism in Twentieth-Century Cultural Movements). Pp. 293–308 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang, and pp. 68–83 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. Translated in Contemporary Chinese Thought 29.4 (Summer 1998), 5–28. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient) 1.1 (1993), 38–44, and Zhexue zazhi (Philosophy Journal), no. 2 (1992).Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Ershi shiji Zhongguo wenhua zhong de ruxue kunjing” (The Predicament of Confucianism in Twentieth-Century Chinese Culture), Zhejiang shehui kexue (Zhejiang Social Sciences), no. 3 (May 1998), 26–32. A modified version of this text was published in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai, 84–96.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Feng Youlan wenhuaguan de jianli yu fazhan” (The Foundation and Development of Feng Youlan’s Cultural Perspective). Pp. 130–62 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. Originally published in Xueren (The Scholar), no. 4 (1993), 126–46, under the title “Feng Youlan wenhuaguan shulun” (Commentary on Feng Youlan’s View of Culture).Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “‘Guoxue re’ yu chuantong wenhua yanjiu de wenti” (The “National Studies Craze” and the Problem of Research on Traditional Culture), Kongzi yanjiu (Confucius Research), no. 2 (1995), 4–6.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Huajie ‘chuantong’ yu ‘xiandai’ de jinzhang: ‘Wusi’ wenhua sichao de fansi” (Dissolving the Tensions between “Tradition” and “Modernity”: Reflections on “May Fourth” Cultural Trends). Pp. 373–98 in Chen, Chen Lai zixuanji (Self-Selected Works of Chen Lai). Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 1997. Originally published in Lin Yü-sheng et al., Wusi: Duoyuan de fansi, 151–85.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Liang Shuming zaoqi de Dong Xi wenhuaguan” (Liang Shuming’s Early Views of Eastern and Western Cultures). Pp. 97–129 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Renwen zhuyi de shijie” (The Scope of Humanism), Dongfang wenhua (Eastern Culture) 18.1 (1997), 14–20. A modified version of this text was published in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai, 1–12.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Rujia lunli yu Zhongguo xiandaihua” (Confucian Ethics and Chinese Modernization). Pp. 188–206 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. Originally published under the title “Shisu rujia lunli yu houfa xiandaihua” (Vulgar Confucianism and the Modernization of Late Developing Countries), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 22 (April 1994), 112–20.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Rujia sixiang yu xiandai Dong Ya shijie” (Confucian Thought and the Modern East Asian World). Pp. 179–87 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient), no. 3 (1994), 10–13.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “‘Wusi’ Dong Xi wenhua lunzheng de fansi” (Reflections on the May Fourth Debates on Eastern and Western Cultures). Pp. 157–74 in Beijing daxue shehui kexuechu, ed., Beijing daxue jinian wusi yundong qishi zhounian lunwenji. Also appearing under the title “Wusi wenhua sichao fansi” (Reflections on May Fourth Culture), Dushu (Reading), no. 5 (1989), 49–55.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “‘Wusi’ sichao yu xiandaixing” (The “May Fourth” Trend and Modernity). Pp. 60–67 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Xin lixue yu xiandaixing siwei de fansi” (New Rational Philosophy and Reflections on Modernity Thought). Pp. 163–78 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. Originally published in Beijing daxue xuebao (Peking University Journal), no. 1 (1995), 57–64, 128, under the title “‘Xin lixue’ de xiandaihua lun yu ‘xiandaixing’ siwei de jiantao” (Examining the Modernization of ‘New Rational Philosophy’ and ‘Modernity’ Thought).Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Zhenxia qiyuan” (A Propitious New Start), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 10 (April 1992), 10–11.Google Scholar

Lai, Chen. “Zhongguo jindai sixiang de huigu yu qianzhan” (Retrospect and Prospects for Modern Chinese Thought). Pp. 13–30 in Chen, Chuantong yu xiandai. A different version was originally published in Tianjin shehui kexue (Tianjin Social Sciences), no. 5 (1989), 3–8.Google Scholar

Pingyuan, Chen. “Jin bainian Zhongguo jingying wenhua de shiluo” (The Decline of High Culture in China during the Last One Hundred Years), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 17 (June 1993), 11–22.Google Scholar

Pingyuan, Chen, Hui, Wang, and Shouchang, Wang, eds. Xueren (The Scholar). Jiangsu: Jiangsu wenyi chubanshe, 1991–2000.Google Scholar

Shaoming, Chen. “Didiao yixie: Xiang wenhua baoshou zhuyi jiangyan” (Tone Down a Little: Advice to Cultural Conservatism). Pp. 507–13 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient), no. 3 (1996), 86–88.Google Scholar

Chen, Xiaomei. Occidentalism: A Theory of Counter-discourse in Post-Mao China. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Chen, Xiaoming. “Antiradicalism and the Historical Situation of Contemporary Chinese Intellectuals,” Contemporary Chinese Thought 29.2 (Winter 1997–98), 29–44. Translation of Chen, “Fan jijin yu dangdai zhishi fenzi de lishi jingyu.”Google Scholar

Chen, Xiaoming. “Baoshouxing yu hefahua: Pingxi dalu zheng xingcheng yizhong wenhua lichang” (Conservative Disposition and Legitimation: Review of a Cultural Position That Is Taking Shape on the Mainland), Zhongguo luntan (China Forum) 16 (February 1, 1992), 93–97.Google Scholar

Chen, Xiaoming. “Fan jijin yu dangdai zhishi fenzi de lishi jingyu” (Anti-radicalism and the Historical Situation of Contemporary Intellectuals). Pp. 309–20 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient), no. 2 (January 1994), 11–15.Google Scholar

Xiaoming, Chen, Yiwu, Zhang, Jinhua, Dai, and Wei, Zhu. “Dongfang zhuyi he houzhimin zhuyi” (Orientalism and Postcolonialism), Zhongshan (Purple Mountain) 88.1 (1994), 126–48.Google Scholar

Xiaoya, Chen. “Shei yingdang dui Xinhai geming fuze” (Who Ought to be Responsible for the 1911 Revolution?). Pp. 93–102 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang.Google Scholar

Xueran, Chen. Wusi zai Xianggang: Zhimin qingjing, minzu zhuyi ji bentu yishi (May Fourth in Hong Kong: Colonial Context, Nationalism and Local Consciousness). Xianggang: Zhonghua shuju, 2014.Google Scholar

Chiu-Duke, Josephine and Duke, Michael S.. “Editorial Note.” Pp. xiii–xxii in Ying-shih, Yü, with Chiu-Duke, Josephine and Duke, Michael S., eds., Chinese History and Culture, Volume Two, Seventeenth Century through Twentieth Century. New York: Columbia University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Chou, Grace Ai-Ling. Confucianism, Colonialism, and the Cold War: Chinese Cultural Education at Hong Kong’s New Asia College, 1949–1963. Leiden: Brill, 2012.Google Scholar

Chow, Rey, ed. Modern Chinese Literary and Cultural Studies in the Age of Theory: Reimagining a Field. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Chow, Tse-tsung. The May Fourth Movement: Intellectual Revolution in Modern China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1960.Google Scholar

Ci, Jiwei. Dialectic of the Chinese Revolution: From Utopianism to Hedonism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Cong, Xiaoping. “Road to Revival: A New Move in the Making of Legitimacy for the Ruling Party in China,” Journal of Contemporary China 22.83 (2013), 905–22.Google Scholar

Cook, Alexander C. The Cultural Revolution on Trial: Mao and the Gang of Four. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Zhiyuan, Cui. “Zhidu chuangxin yu di’erci sixiang jiefang” (Institutional Innovation and a Second Liberation of Thought), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 24 (August 1994), 5–16.Google Scholar

Davies, Gloria. “Anticipating Community, Producing Dissent: The Politics of Recent Chinese Intellectual Praxis,” China Review 2.2 (Fall 2002), 1–35.Google Scholar

Davies, Gloria. “The Self-Made Maps of Chinese Intellectuality.” Pp. 17–46 in Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns.Google Scholar

Davies, Gloria, ed. Voicing Concerns: Contemporary Chinese Critical Inquiry. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2001.Google Scholar

Davies, Gloria. Worrying about China: The Language of Chinese Critical Inquiry. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Davis, Edward L., ed. Encyclopedia of Contemporary Chinese Culture. London: Routledge, 2005.Google Scholar

de Bary, Wm. Theodore. “The New Confucianism in Beijing,” American Scholar 64.2 (January 1995), 175–89.Google Scholar

De Jong, Alice. “The Demise of the Dragon: Backgrounds to the Chinese Film ‘River Elegy,’” China Information 4.3 (1989), 28–43.Google Scholar

Deng, Xiaoping. “Emancipate the Mind, Seek Truth from Facts, and Unite as One in Looking to the Future,” December 13, 1978. Pp. 151–63 in Selected Works of Deng Xiaoping (1975–1982). Beijing: Foreign Languages Press, 1984.Google Scholar

Deng, Zhenglai, ed. Zhongguo xueshu guifanhua taolun wenxuan (Selections from the Debate on Chinese Academic Standardization). Beijing: Falü chubanshe, 2004.Google Scholar

Dikötter, Frank. The Cultural Revolution: A People’s History, 1962–1976. London: Bloomsbury, 2016.Google Scholar

Ding, Chu. “Cong ‘yi’ xiang ‘li’ de zhanlüe zhanbian” (Strategic Switch from “Principle” to “Profit”), Zhongguo zhi chun (China Spring), no. 1 (January 1992), 30–31. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 55–57.Google Scholar

Ding, X. L. The Decline of Communism in China: Legitimacy Crisis, 1977–1989. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Ding, Xiaoqiang and Xu, Zi, eds. Wusi yu xiandai Zhongguo: Wusi xinlun (May Fourth and Modern China: New Views on May Fourth). Taiyuan: Shanxi renmin chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Confucius in the Borderlands: Global Capitalism and the Reinvention of Confucianism,” Boundary 2 22.3 (Fall 1995), 229–73.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. Culture and History in Postrevolutionary China: The Perspective of Global Modernity. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Guest Editor’s Introduction,” China Perspectives, no. 1 (2011), 2–3.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Mao Zedong in Contemporary Chinese Official Discourse and History,” China Perspectives, no. 2 (2012), 17–27.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “The Past as Ideology and Critical Resource: Politics and Historical Revisionism after the Fall,” unpublished conference paper, Workshop on Revisionism, Leiden, November 2005.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Postsocialism? Reflections on ‘Socialism with Chinese Characteristics.’” Pp. 362–84 in Dirlik, and Meisner, Maurice, eds., Marxism and the Chinese Experience: Issues in Contemporary Chinese Socialism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1989.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Reversals, Ironies, Hegemonies: Notes on the Contemporary Historiography of Modern China,” Modern China 22.3 (July 1996), 243–84.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “T’ao Hsi-sheng: The Social Limits of Change.” Pp. 305–31 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif. “Zhongguohua: Worlding China: The Case of Sociology and Anthropology in Twentieth-Century China.” Pp. 197–240 in Dirlik, Culture and History in Postrevolutionary China.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif and Xudong, Zhang. “Introduction: Postmodernism and China.” Pp. 1–17 in Dirlik and Zhang, eds., Postmodernism and China.Google Scholar

Dirlik, Arif and Zhang, Xudong, eds. Postmodernism and China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Djilas, Milovan. The New Class: An Analysis of the Communist System. New York: Praeger, 1971 [1957].Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit. “De-constructing the Chinese Nation.” Pp. 31–55 in Unger, Jonathan, ed., Chinese Nationalism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.Google Scholar

Duara, Prasenjit. “Empires and Imperialism.” Pp. 384–98 in Duara, Prasenjit, Murthy, Viren, and Sartori, Andrew, eds., A Companion to Global Historical Thought. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar

Dunlop, John B. “The August 1991 Coup and Its Impact on Soviet Politics,” Journal of Cold War Studies 5.1 (2003), 94–127.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. The Illusions of Postmodernism. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996.Google Scholar

Eagleton, Terry. Literary Theory: An Introduction, 2nd ed. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell, 1996 [1983].Google Scholar

Eastman, Lloyd. “The Kuomintang in the 1930s.” Pp. 191–212 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N. “This-Worldly Transcendentalism and the Structuring of the World: Weber’s ‘Religion of China’ and the Format of Chinese History and Civilization,” Journal of Developing Societies 1.2 (1985), 168–86.Google Scholar

Eisenstadt, Shmuel N., ed. Multiple Modernities. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 2002.Google Scholar

Elman, Benjamin A. “The Failures of Contemporary Chinese Intellectual History,” Eighteenth-Century Studies 43.3 (2010), 371–91.Google Scholar

Esherick, Joseph W., Pickowicz, Paul G., and Walder, Andrew G., eds. The Chinese Cultural Revolution as History. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Fan, Dainian. “Science, Open Society and China.” Pp. 11–20 in Newton-Smith, W. H. and Tianji, Jiang, eds., Popper in China. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Qinlin, Fan. “Ruhe pingjia ‘wusi’ baihuawen yundong? Yu Zheng Min xiansheng shangque” (How to Evaluate the “May Fourth” Vernacular Language Movement? A Discussion with Zheng Min). Pp. 187–97 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Wenxue pinglun (Literary Review), no. 2 (1994), 112–17.Google Scholar

Xing, Fan. “Fulu: Jiushi niandai de sixiang liebian” (Addendum: Thought Fission of the 1990s). Pp. 281–301 in Fan, Shijimo wenhua sichaoshi (History of Cultural Trends at the End of the Century). Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Yun, Fan. “Zuowei fangfa de Lusuo: Xiandai Zhongguo bainian Lusuoxue de fansi” (Rousseau as an Approach: Reflections on a Century of Rousseau Studies in Modern China), Zhejiang daxue xuebao (Journal of Zhejiang University) 43.1 (March 2013), 160–68.Google Scholar

Keli, Fang. “Yao zhuyi yanjiu jiushi niandai chuxian de wenhua baoshou zhuyi sichao” (One Should Attentively Research the Cultural Conservative Trend that Appeared during the 1990s), Wenyi lilun yu piping (Literary Theory and Criticism), no. 3 (1996), 11–19.Google Scholar

Wang, Fang. “Huaxia wenming chuantong yu zuguo xiandaihua de sikao: Lun He Xin de wenhuaxue yanjiu” (Reflections on Chinese Civilization and Culture and the Modernization of the Motherland: On He Xin’s Research on Cultural Studies), Zhongguo qingnianbao (China Youth Daily), January 10, 1991, 4.Google Scholar

Lin, Feng, ed. Chongxin renshi bainian Zhongguo: Jindaishi redian wenti yanjiu yu zhengming (A New Understanding of One Hundred Years of China: Research and Debates on Popular Issues in Modern Chinese History). 2 vols. Beijing: Gaige chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Feng, Youlan. The Hall of Three Pines: An Account of My Life, tr. Mair, Denis C.. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph. China since Tiananmen: The Politics of Transition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph. “De Tocqueville in Beijing,” China Leadership Monitor, no. 39 (Fall 2012), http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/files/documents/CLM39JF.pdf.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph. Elite Politics in Contemporary China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph. “Neoconservatism and the End of the Dengist Era,” Asian Survey 35.7 (1995), 635–51.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph. “Reaction, Resurgence, and Succession: Chinese Politics since Tiananmen.” Pp. 468–527 in MacFarquhar, Roderick, ed., The Politics of China: Sixty Years of the People’s Republic. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Fewsmith, Joseph, tr. “Wang Shaoguang Proposal (I) and (II),” Chinese Economy 28.3 (May–June 1995) and 28.4 (July–August 1995).Google Scholar

Fokkema, Douwe and Bertens, Hans. Approaching Postmodernism. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins, 1986. Translated as Zouxiang houxiandai zhuyi (Postmodernism), tr. Wang Ning et al. Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1991; Taipei: Taiwan shuxin chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Frenkiel, Ėmilie. Conditional Democracy: The Contemporary Debate on Political Reform in Chinese Universities. Colchester: ECPR Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Keng, Fu. “Dalu zhishi fenzi de jijin zhuyi shenhua” (The Myth of the Radicalism of Mainland Intellectuals), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 11 (June 1992a), 144–47.Google Scholar

Keng, Fu. “Langman lixiang yu shigong jingshen: Ying Fa zhishi jieceng de chayi” (Romantic Ideals and the Spirit of Cause and Contribution: Differences between English and French Intellectuals), Dushu (Reading), no. 1 (1992b), 30–37.Google Scholar

Fung, Edmund S. K. The Intellectual Foundations of Chinese Modernity: Cultural and Political Thought in the Republican Era. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Furth, Charlotte. “Culture and Politics in Modern Chinese Conservatism.” Pp. 22–53 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Furth, Charlotte. “Intellectual Change: From the Reform Movement to the May Fourth Movement, 1895–1920.” Pp. 322–405 in Fairbank, John King, ed., The Cambridge History of China, Vol. 12: Republican China, 1912–1949, Part 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1983.Google Scholar

Furth, Charlotte, ed. The Limits of Change: Essays on Conservative Alternatives in Republican China. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1976.Google Scholar

Furth, Charlotte. “The Sage as Rebel: The Inner World of Chang Ping-lin.” Pp. 113–50 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Yang, Gan. “A Critique of Chinese Conservatism in the 1990s,” tr. Xudong, Zhang, Social Text 16.2 (Summer 1998), 45–66.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Debating Liberalism and Democracy in China in the 1990s.” Pp. 79–101 in Xudong, Zhang, ed., Whither China: Intellectual Politics in Contemporary China. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Fan minzhu ziyou zhuyi haishi minzhu de ziyou zhuyi” (Anti-democratic Liberalism or Democratic Liberalism?), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 39 (February 1997), 4–17.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. Tong santong (Unifying the Three Traditions). Beijing: Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlian shudian, 2007.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Xiangtu Zhongguo chongjian yu Zhongguo wenhua qianjing” (The Future of Chinese Culture in Relation to Rural Reconstruction), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 16 (April 1993), 4–7.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Yangqi ‘minzhu yu kexue,’ dianding ‘ziyou yu zhixu’” (Discard “Democracy and Science,” Establish “Liberty and Order”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 3 (February 1991), 7–10.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Zhengzhi zheren Shitelaosi: Gudian baoshou zhuyi zhengzhi zhexue de fuxing” (Political Philosopher Leo Strauss: The Revival of Classical Conservative Political Philosophy). Pp. 5–86 in Ziran quanli yu lishi (Natural Right and History), tr. Gang, Peng. Taipei: Zuo’an wenhua, 2005. (The mainland version was published in Beijing by Sanlian chubanshe in 2003.)Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Zhongguo ziyou zuopai de youlai” (The Origins of China’s Liberal Left). Pp. 110–20 in Yang, Gong, ed., Sichao: Zhongguo “xin zuopai” ji qi yingxiang (Trend of Thought: China’s “New Left” and Its Influence). Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 2003.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Ziyou de diren: Zhenshanmei tongyi shuo” (The Enemy of Freedom: The Unification of Truth, Goodness, and Beauty), Dushu (Reading), no. 6 (1989), 121–28.Google Scholar

Gan, Yang. “Ziyou de linian: Wusi chuantong zhi queshimian wei ‘wusi’ qishi zhounian er zou” (The Concept of Freedom: Loss of the May Fourth Tradition and the Making of the Seventieth Anniversary of the May Fourth Era), Dushu (Reading), no. 5 (1989), 11–19.Google Scholar

Garver, John W. “The Chinese Communist Party and the Collapse of Soviet Communism,” China Quarterly, no. 133 (1993), 1–26.Google Scholar

Gasster, Michael. Chinese Intellectuals and the Revolution of 1911: The Birth of Modern Chinese Radicalism. Seattle: University of Washington Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Gay, Peter. The Enlightenment: An Interpretation. New York: Knopf, 1966–69.Google Scholar

Ge, Zhaoguang. An Intellectual History of China, Volume One, tr. Duke, Michael S. and Chiu-Duke, Josephine. Leiden: Brill, 2014.Google Scholar

Yunzhi, Geng. “Yanjiu lishi yao kao lishi shishi” (In Researching History, One Must Rely on Historical Reality). Pp. 382–84 in Jiansun, Sha and Shuduo, Gong, eds., Zou shenme lu: Guanyu Zhongguo jinxiandai lishi shang de ruogan zhongda shifei wenti (Which Way to Go? Some Major Disputes on Modern Chinese History). Ji’nan: Shandong renmin chubanshe, 1997.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. Beyond Left and Right: The Future of Radical Politics. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Giddens, Anthony. Politics and Sociology in the Thought of Max Weber. London: Macmillan, 1972.Google Scholar

Goldman, Merle, ed. Modern Chinese Literature in the May Fourth Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar

Goldman, Merle. “Repression of China’s Public Intellectuals in the Post-Mao Era,” Social Research 76.2 (July 2009), 659–86.Google Scholar

Goldman, Merle. Sowing the Seeds of Democracy in China: Political Reform in the Deng Xiaoping Era. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Goldman, Merle and Cheek, Timothy. “Introduction: Uncertain Change.” Pp. 1–20 in Goldman, Merle, Cheek, Timothy, and Hamrin, Carol Lee, eds., China’s Intellectuals and the State: In Search of a New Relationship. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1987.Google Scholar

Shuduo, Gong, Chongji, Jin, and Xiaoqing, Song. Lishi de huida: Zhongguo jindaishi yanjiu zhong de jige yuanze lunzheng (History’s Response: Some Principal Debates in Research on Modern Chinese History). Beijing: Beijing shifan daxue chubanshe, 2001.Google Scholar

Shuduo, Gong, Wenhai, Li, Haipeng, Zhang, et al. “Wusi yundong yu ershi shiji Zhongguo de daolu” (The May Fourth Movement and the Road of Twentieth-Century China), Gaoxiao lilun zhanxian (Theoretical Front in Higher Education), no. 6 (1996), 16–25.Google Scholar

Goodman, David S. G. and Segal, Gerald, eds. China in the Nineties: Crisis Management and Beyond. Oxford: Clarendon, 1991.Google Scholar

Grieder, Jerome. Hu Shih and the Chinese Renaissance: Liberalism in the Chinese Revolution, 1917–1937. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1970.Google Scholar

Gu, Edward and Goldman, Merle. “Introduction: The Transformation of the Relationship between Chinese Intellectuals and the State.” Pp. 1–17 in Gu, and Goldman, , eds., Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.Google Scholar

Xin, Gu. “Anggelu ziyou chuantong yu Falanxi langman jingshen” (On the Anglo-Liberal Tradition and the French Romantic Spirit), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 6 (August 1991), 138–40.Google Scholar

Gu, Xin and Kelly, David. “New Conservatism: Intermediate Ideology of a ‘New Elite.’” Pp. 219–33 in Goodman, David S. G. and Hooper, Beverley, eds., China’s Quiet Revolution: New Interactions between State and Society. New York: St. Martin’s, 1994.Google Scholar

Zhun, Gu. Gu Zhun riji (Gu Zhun’s Diaries), ed. Minzhi, Chen and Dong, Ding. Beijing: Jingji ribao chubanshe, 1997.Google Scholar

Zhun, Gu. Gu Zhun wenji (Collected Works of Gu Zhun). Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe, 1994.Google Scholar

Zhun, Gu. Xila chengbang zhidu: Du Xilashi biji (The Greek Polis System: Notes on Reading Greek History), 2nd ed. Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1986.Google Scholar

Guo, Yingjie. Cultural Nationalism in Contemporary China: The Search for National Identity under Reform. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Guo, Yingjie. “Rewriting National History: The Zeng Guofan Phenomenon.” Pp. 49–71 in Guo, Cultural Nationalism.Google Scholar

Habermas, Jürgen. The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity: Twelve Lectures, tr. Lawrence, Frederick. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1987.Google Scholar

Hammond, Kenneth J. and Richey, Jeffrey L., eds. The Sage Returns: Confucian Revival in Contemporary China. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2015.Google Scholar

Hamrin, Carol Lee and Cheek, Timothy, eds. China’s Establishment Intellectuals. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1986.Google Scholar

Demin, Han. “Chuantong wenhua de weiji yu ershi shiji fan wenhua sichao” (The Crisis of Traditional Culture and Twentieth-Century Anti-culture Trends), Yuandao (True Way) 1 (1994), 311–40.Google Scholar

Hanyu dacidian bianyuanhui (Chinese Dictionary Editorial Committee), ed. Hanyu da cidian (Chinese Dictionary), 13 vols. Shanghai: Hanyu dacidian chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Hao, Zhidong. Intellectuals at a Crossroads: The Changing Politics of China’s Knowledge Workers. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Harvey, David. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford: Blackwell, 1990.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. The Collected Works of F.A. Hayek, Vol. 1: The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism, ed. Bartley, W. W. III. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. The Constitution of Liberty. London: Routledge, 2006 [1960].Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. “Postscript: Why I Am Not a Conservative.” Pp. 343–55 in Hayek, Constitution of Liberty.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. “The Pretence of Knowledge.” Pp. 23–34 in New Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas. London: Routledge, 1978.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. [Hayeke]. Tongxiang nuyi de daolu (The Road to Serfdom). Beijing: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1962.Google Scholar

Hayek, Friedrich A. [Hayeke]. Ziyou zhixu yuanli (The Constitution of Liberty), tr. Zhenglai, Deng. Beijing: Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlian shudian, 1997.Google Scholar

Hayhoe, Ruth. China’s Universities 1895–1995: A Century of Cultural Conflict. Hong Kong: Comparative Education Research Centre, University of Hong Kong, 1999.Google Scholar

He, Henry Yuhuai. Dictionary of the Political Thought of the People’s Republic of China. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Pin, He. “‘Disan zhi yan’ haishi ‘disan zhi shou’? Liu Huaqing nüxu Pan Yue he ‘disan zhi yanjing kan Zhongguo’” (A “Third Eye” or a “Third Hand”? Liu Huaqing’s Son-in-Law Pan Yue and Looking at China through a Third Eye), Beijing zhi chun (Beijing Spring), no. 17 (1994), 21–22.Google Scholar

He, Rowena Xiaoqing. Tiananmen Exiles: Voices of the Struggle for Democracy in China. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2014.Google Scholar

He, Xin. Lun zhengzhi guojia zhuyi: He Xin jinqi zhenglun (On Political Statism: Recent Political Commentaries by He Xin). Beijing: Shishi chubanshe, 2003.Google Scholar

He, Xin. “Wode kunhuo yu youlü” (My Perplexities and Concerns), Xuexi yuekan (Study Monthly), no. 12 (1988), 36–37.Google Scholar

He, Xin. “A Word of Advice to the Politburo,” tr. Geremie R. Barmé. Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, no. 23 (January 1990), 49–76.Google Scholar

Higonnet, Patrice. Sister Republics: The Origins of French and American Republicanism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1988.Google Scholar

Hon, Tze-ki. “Global Capitalism with Chinese Characteristics: Fang Keli’s New Confucian Research Project (1986–1995).” Pp. 3–18 in Hon, Tze-ki and Stapleton, Kristin, eds., Confucianism for the Contemporary World: Global Order, Political Plurality, and Social Action. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hon, Tze-ki. “Introduction: Confucianism for the Contemporary World.” Pp. xi–xxix in Hon, Tze-ki and Stapleton, Kristin, eds., Confucianism for the Contemporary World: Global Order, Political Plurality, and Social Action. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2017.Google Scholar

Hon, Tze-ki. Revolution as Restoration: Guocui Xuebao and China’s Path to Modernity, 1905–1911. Leiden: Brill, 2013.Google Scholar

Hook, Leslie. “The Rise of China’s New Left,” Far Eastern Economic Review 170.3 (April 2007), 8–14.Google Scholar

Hsü, Immanuel C. Y. China without Mao: The Search for a New Order, 2nd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar

Hu, Angang, Wang, Shaoguang, and Xiaoguang, Kang. Zhongguo diqu chaju baogao (A Report on China’s Regional Disparities). Shenyang: Liaoning renmin chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Cheng, Hu. “Jijin zhuyi yihuo shi baoli zhuyi” (Radicalism or Ideology of Violence), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 13 (October 1992), 139–45.Google Scholar

Ping, Hu. “Bitan Zhonggong jiebanren de gangling: Ruhe kandai ‘Yingdui yu xuanze’” (Notes on the Program of the CCP Heirs Apparent: How to Treat “Realistic Responses”), Zhongguo zhi chun (China Spring), no. 1 (January 1992), 23–24. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 38–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Sheng, Hu. Cong yapian zhanzheng dao wusi yundong (From the Opium War to the May Fourth Movement), 2 vols. Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1981.Google Scholar

Shi, Hu. “Duo yanjiu xie wenti, shao tan xie ‘zhuyi’” (Research More Problems, Speak Fewer “-Isms”), Meizhou pinglun (Weekly Review), July 20, 1919, 1.Google Scholar

Hu, Shi. “Wenxue gailiang chuyi” (Some Tentative Suggestions for the Reform of Chinese Literature). Pp. 146–55 in Duxiu, Chen, Zhongjiang, Wang, and Shuya, Yuan, Xin qingnian: Minzhu yu kexue de huhuan (New Youth: The Call of Democracy and Science). Zhengzhou: Zhongzhou guji chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Hua, Shiping. Scientism and Humanism: Two Cultures in Post-Mao China, 1978–1989. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Huang, Guiyou. Whitmanism, Imagism, and Modernism in China and America. Selinsgrove, PA: Susquehanna University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Kewu, Huang. Ziyou de suoyiran: Yan Fu dui Yuehan Mi’er ziyou zhuyi sixiang de renshi yu pipan (The Raison d’Être of Freedom: Yan Fu’s Understanding and Critique of John Mill’s Liberalism). Taipei: Yunchen wenhua shiye gufen youxian gongsi, 1998.Google Scholar

Hughes, Christopher R. Chinese Nationalism in the Global Era. London: Routledge, 2006.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. Biange shehui zhong de zhengzhi zhixu (Political Order in Changing Societies), ed. Shengping, Li. Beijing: Huaxia chubanshe, 1988.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. “The Clash of Civilizations?” Foreign Affairs 72.3 (Summer 1993), 22–49.Google Scholar

Huntington, Samuel. Political Order in Changing Societies. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Huters, Theodore. “Appropriations: Another Look at Yan Fu and Western Ideas,” Xueren (The Scholar), no. 9 (April 1996), 296–355.Google Scholar

Idema, Wilt and Haft, Lloyd. Chinese letterkunde: Een inleiding (Chinese Literature: An Introduction). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Ip, Hung-Yok, Hon, Tze-ki, and Lee, Chiu-Chun. “The Plurality of Chinese Modernity: A Review of Recent Scholarship on the May Fourth Movement,” Modern China 29.4 (October 2003), 490–509.Google Scholar

Israel, Jonathan I. Radical Enlightenment: Philosophy and the Making of Modernity, 1650–1750. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric [Zhan Mingxin]. Houxiandai zhuyi yu wenhua lilun (Postmodernism and Cultural Theory), tr. Xiaobing, Tang, 3rd rev. ed. Taipei: Hezhi wenhua shiye gufen youxian gongsi, 1980.Google Scholar

Jameson, Fredric. Postmodernism; or, The Cultural Logic of Late Capitalism. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Jenco, Leigh. “Introduction: On the Possibility of Chinese Thought as Global Theory.” Pp. 1–25 in Jenco, , ed., Chinese Thought as Global Theory: Diversifying Knowledge Production in the Social Sciences and Humanities. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2016.Google Scholar

Jenks, Edward. A History of Politics. London: J.M. Dent, 1900.Google Scholar

Jenner, William J. F. “Review of The August Sleepwalker,” Australian Journal of Chinese Affairs, no. 23 (January 1990), 193–95.Google Scholar

Guangmao, Ji. “Nanyuan yu beizhe zhijian: Cong liangpian wenzhang lüekui baoshou zhuyi yu jijin zhuyi de xunxi” (In between Opposite Directions: Taking a Quick Peek at the Message of Conservatism and Radicalism from Two Texts), Wenyi zhengming (Debates on Literature and Art), no. 4 (1995), 12–20.Google Scholar

Shu-li, Ji. “The Worlds of Cultures and World 3: A Discussion of Popper’s Theory of Three Worlds.” Pp. 109–24 in Newton-Smith, W. H. and Tianji, Jiang, eds., Popper in China. London: Routledge, 1992.Google Scholar

Xianlin, Ji, Junning, Liu, and Pang, Pu. “Zouchu chuantong yanjiu chuantong” (Out of the Traditional Research Tradition), Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), December 6, 1994, 1.Google Scholar

Tao, Jiang. “Wanqing zhengzhishi” (Late Qing Political History). Pp. 19–43 in Yeying, Zeng, ed., Wushi nian lai de Zhongguo jindaishi yanjiu.Google Scholar

Xudong, Jiang. “Lun dangdai Zhongguo wenhua baoshou zhuyi de jiazhi tezheng” (On the Value Characteristics of Contemporary Chinese Cultural Conservatism), Ph.D. diss., Zhongguo renmin daxue, 2003.Google Scholar

Yihua, Jiang. “Ershi shiji ruxue zai Zhongguo de chonggou” (The Reconfiguration of Twentieth-Century Confucianism in China), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 1 (October 1990), 28–35.Google Scholar

Yihua, Jiang. “Jijin yu baoshou: Yu Yü Ying-shih xiansheng shangque” (Radicalism and Conservatism: A Discussion with Yü Ying-shih), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 10 (April 1992), 134–42.Google Scholar

Yihua, Jiang. “Ershi shiji Zhongguo sixiangshi shang de zhengzhi baoshou zhuyi” (Political Conservatism in Twentieth-Century Chinese Intellectual History). Pp. 57–73 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Tansuo yu zhengming (Exploration and Contention), no. 1 (1993), 30, 47–56.Google Scholar

Yihua, Jiang and Yan, Chen. “Jijin yu baoshou: Yiduan shangwei wanjie de duihua” (Conservative and Radical: An Unfinished Dialogue). Pp. 30–36 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Kaifang shidai (Open Times), no. 2 (1997), 37–41.Google Scholar

Guantao, Jin and Qingfeng, Liu. Guannianshi yanjiu: Zhongguo xiandai zhongyao zhengzhi shuyu de xingcheng (Studies in Conceptual History: The Formation of Key Modern Chinese Political Terms). Hong Kong: Dangdai Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu zhongxin, Chinese University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Yuanpu, Jin. “He yi ‘baoshou zhuyi’ er you ‘xin’?” (Why “Conservatism” and Why “Neo”?). Pp. 385–900 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Dushu (Reading), no. 5 (1996), 84–88.Google Scholar

Kahn, Herman. World Economic Development: 1979 and Beyond. Boulder, CO: Westview, 1979.Google Scholar

Kang, Xiaoguang. Xin baoshou zhuyi zhenglunji (Collected Political Essays on Neoconservatism). Beijing: n.p., 2002.Google Scholar

Karl, Rebecca E. Staging the World: Chinese Nationalism at the Turn of the Twentieth Century. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Kelly, David. “Chinese Marxism since Tiananmen: Between Evaporation and Dismemberment.” Pp. 19–34 in Goodman and Segal, eds., China in the Nineties.Google Scholar

Kelly, David. “The Emergence of Humanism: Wang Ruoshui and the Critique of Socialist Alienation.” Pp. 159–62 in Goldman, Merle, Cheek, Timothy, and Hamrin, Carol Lee, eds., China’s Intellectuals and the State: In Search of a New Relationship. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1987.Google Scholar

Kelly, David, ed. “Realistic Responses and Strategic Options: An Alternative CCP Ideology and Its Critics,” Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 1–96.Google Scholar

Kenley, David L. New Culture in a New World: The May Fourth Movement and the Chinese Diaspora in Singapore, 1919–1932. London: Routledge, 2003.Google Scholar

Kluver, Alan R. Legitimating the Chinese Economic Reforms: A Rhetoric of Myth and Orthodoxy. Albany: State University of New York Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Knight, Nick. Rethinking Mao: Explorations in Mao Zedong’s Thought. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2007.Google Scholar

Lingzhao, Kong. “Ba lishi de neirong huangei lishi: Ping yizhong guannianlun de wenhua shiguan” (Returning the Content of History to History: Criticizing a Conceptual Cultural View of History), Zhexue yanjiu (Philosophy Research), no. 4 (1995), 3–7.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time, tr. Tribe, Keith. New York: Colombia University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Koselleck, Reinhart. “The Historical-Political Semantics of Asymmetric Counterconcepts.” Pp. 155–91 in Koselleck, Futures Past.Google Scholar

Kramnick, Isaac, ed. The Portable Edmund Burke. London: Penguin, 1999.Google Scholar

Kristol, Irving. Neoconservatism: The Autobiography of an Idea. New York: Free Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Kwan, Daniel. “Stability Put Before Reform,” South China Morning Post, May 8, 1992, 12.Google Scholar

Kwok, D. W. Y. Scientism in Chinese Thought, 1900–1950. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Kwong, Luke S. W. “The Rise of the Linear Perspective on History and Time in Late Qing China c. 1860–1911,” Past and Present 173.1 (November 2001), 157–90.Google Scholar

Lam, Willy Wo-Lap. “Chen’s Son Bids to Expand Power Base,” South China Morning Post, May 19, 1992, 11.Google Scholar

Aiguo, Lan. “Shijimo wenxue: Wenhua baoshou zhuyi sichao” (End of the Century Literature: The Cultural Conservative Trend), Wenyi zhengming (Debates on Literature and Art), no. 6 (1994), 34–37.Google Scholar

Lanza, Fabio. Behind the Gate: Inventing Students in Beijing. New York: Columbia University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Lee, Gregory B. Troubadours, Trumpeters, Troubled Makers: Lyricism, Nationalism, and Hybridity in China and Its Others. London: Hurst, 1996.Google Scholar

Lee, Leo Ou-fan. “Literary Trends: The Quest for Modernity, 1895–1927.” Pp. 142–95 in Goldman, Merle and Lee, Leo Ou-Fan, eds., An Intellectual History of Modern China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Yi, Lei. “Beijing yu cuowei: Ye tan Zhongguo de ‘houzhimin’ yu ‘houxiandai’” (Background and Dislocation: Also on China’s “Postcolonialism” and “Postmodernism”), Dushu (Reading), no. 4 (1995), 16–20.Google Scholar

Levenson, Joseph R. Confucian China and Its Modern Fate: A Trilogy. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Levenson, Joseph R.. “‘History’ and ‘Value’: The Tensions of Intellectual Choice in Modern China.” Pp. 146–94 in Wright, Arthur F., ed., Studies in Chinese Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Guoyan, Li, et al., eds. Dangdai Hanyu cidian (A Contemporary Chinese Dictionary). Shanghai: Shanghai cishu chubanshe, 2001.Google Scholar

Li, He. “Debating China’s Economic Reform: New Leftists vs. Liberals,” Journal of Chinese Political Science 15.1 (2010), 1–23.Google Scholar

Li, Huaiyin. “From Revolution to Modernization: The Paradigmatic Transition in Chinese Historiography in the Reform Era,” History and Theory 49.3 (2010), 336–60.Google Scholar

Li, Huaiyin. Reinventing Modern China: Imagination and Authenticity in Chinese Historical Writing. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Jinquan, Li. “Zhongguo jindaishi jige wenti pingjia de zai pingjia” (Re-evaluating the Assessments of Some Issues in Modern Chinese History). Pp. 84–92 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Zhexue yanjiu (Philosophy Research), no. 10 (1995), 3–7.Google Scholar

Liangyu, Li. “Jijin, baoshou yu zhishi fenzi de zeren” (Radicalism, Conservatism, and the Responsibility of Intellectuals), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 12 (August 1992), 132–34.Google Scholar

Ping, Li, ed. Zhongguo xia yi bu zenyang zou: Dangdai jingying da lunzheng (What Is the Next Step for China? The Big Debate among the Contemporary Elite). Toronto: Mingjing chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Shitao, Li, ed. Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang (Intellectual Positions: The Turbulence between Radicalism and Conservatism). Changchun: Shidai wenyi chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Yi, Li. Zhongguo Makesi zhuyi yu dangdai wenhua baoshou zhuyi sichao yanjiu (Research on Trends in Chinese Marxism and Contemporary Cultural Conservatism). Tianjin: Tianjin shehui kexueyuan chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Li, Youzhuo. “Will Neo-conservatism Dominate Post-Deng China?” China Strategic Review 2.2 (1997), 31–40.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li. “Heping jinhua, fuxing Zhonghua: Tan ‘yao gailiang bu yao geming’” (Peaceful Evolution, Reviving China: On “We Need Reform, Not Revolution”), Zhongguo shibao zhoukan (China Times Weekly), May 3–9, 1992, 42–45 (Part 1), and May 10–16, 1992, 44–47 (Part 2).Google Scholar

Zehou, Li. “Li Zehou dawen” (Li Zehou Answers Questions), Yuandao (True Way) 1(1994), 1–3.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li. “Qimeng yu jiuwang de shuangchong bianzou” (The Double Variation of Enlightenment and Salvation). Pp. 7–49 in Li, Zhongguo xiandai sixiangshi lun (On Modern Chinese Intellectual History). Beijing: Dongfang chubanshe, 1987. Originally published in Zouxiang weilai (Towards the Future), no. 1 (1986), 18–38.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li. Zhongguo jindai sixiangshi lun (On Modern Chinese Intellectual History). Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1979.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li and Yü-sheng, Lin. Wusi: Duoyuan de fansi (May Fourth: Multiple Reflections). Taipei: Fengyun shidai chuban gongsi, 1989.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li and Zaifu, Liu. Gaobie geming: Huiwang ershi shiji Zhongguo (Farewell to Revolution: Looking Back at Twentieth-Century China). Hong Kong: Tiandi tushu youxian gongsi, 1995.Google Scholar

Zehou, Li and Desheng, Wang. “Guanyu wenhua xianzhuang, daode chongjian de duihua” (A Dialogue on the Cultural Status Quo and Moral Reconstruction). Pp. 74–83 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient), no. 5 (1994), 69–73 and no. 6 (1994), 85–87.Google Scholar

Qichao, Liang. “Shige” (Explaining Revolution), December 14, 1902. Pp. 40–45, vol. 1, part 9, in Yinbing shi heji (Collected Works from the Ice Studio), 12 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju, 1989 [reprint].Google Scholar

Shuming, Liang. Dong Xi wenhua ji qi zhexue (Eastern and Western Cultures and Their Philosophies), ed. Zheng, Chen and Changpei, Luo. Shanghai: Shangwu yinshuguan, 1922.Google Scholar

Gang, Lin. “Jijin zhuyi zai Zhongguo” (Radicalism in China), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 3 (February 1991), 17–27.Google Scholar

Lin, Min, with Galikowski, Maria. The Search for Modernity: Chinese Intellectuals and Cultural Discourse in the Post-Mao Era. New York: St. Martin’s, 1999.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Antitraditionalism in the May Fourth Era. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1979.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. “Guanyu ‘Zhongguo yishi de weiji’: Da Sun Longji” (On “The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness”: A Response to Sun Longji), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 3 (February 1991), 136–50.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. “Radical Iconoclasm in the May Fourth Period and the Future of Chinese Liberalism.” Pp. 23–58 in Schwartz, Benjamin, ed., Reflections on the May Fourth Movement: A Symposium. Cambridge, MA: East Asian Research Center, Harvard University, 1972.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. “Reflections on the ‘Creative Transformation of Chinese Tradition,’” tr. Duke, Michael S. and Chiu-Duke, Josephine. Pp. 73–114 in Pohl, Karl-Heinz, ed., Chinese Thought in a Global Context: A Dialogue between Chinese and Western Philosophical Approaches. Leiden: Brill, 1999.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. Zhongguo chuantong de chuangzaoxing zhuanhua (The Creative Transformation of Chinese Tradition). Beijing: Shenghuo, dushu, xinzhi sanlian shudian, 1988.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng [Lin Yusheng]. Zhongguo yishi de weiji: “Wusi” shiqi jilie de fan chuantong zhuyi (The Crisis of Chinese Consciousness: Radical Anti-traditionalism in the “May Fourth” Era). Guiyang: Guizhou renmin chubanshe, 1986.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng, et al. Wusi: Duoyuan de fansi (May Fourth: Multiple Reflections). Hong Kong: Sanlian shudian, 1989.Google Scholar

Lin, Yü-sheng, Jilin, Xu, and Gongqin, Xiao. “‘Wusi’: Duoyuan de fansi: Lin Yü-sheng, Xu Jilin, Xiao Gongqin duihua lu” (Multiple Reflections on “May Fourth”: Record of a Dialogue among Lin Yü-sheng, Xu Jilin, and Xiao Gongqin). Pp. 241–51 in Lin Yü-sheng et al., Wusi: Duoyuan de fansi.Google Scholar

Lipset, Seymour Martin. “Neoconservatism: Myth and Reality.” Pp. 1–18 in Holtfrerich, Carl-Ludwig, ed., Ernst Fraenkel Vorträge zur amerikanischen Politik, Wirtschaft, Gesellschaft und Geschichte (Ernst Fraenkel Lectures on American Politics, Economy, Society, and History). Berlin: John F. Kennedy-Institut für Nordamerikastudien, 1988.Google Scholar

Litzinger, Ralph. “Theorizing Postsocialism: Reflections on the Politics of Marginality in Contemporary China,” South Atlantic Quarterly 101.1 (Winter 2002), 33–55.Google Scholar

Binyan, Liu. “Ping ‘Disan zhi yanjing kan Zhongguo’” (On Looking at China through a Third Eye), Beijing zhi chun (Beijing Spring), no. 17 (October 1994), 23–39.Google Scholar

Dong, Liu. “Beida xuetong yu ‘wusi’ chuantong: Lishi de ling yizhong kenengxing” (The Tradition of Learning at Peking University and the “May Fourth” Tradition: Another Possibility in History). Pp. 241–51 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Dongfang (Orient), no. 4 (1994), 12–17.Google Scholar

Dong, Liu. “Jingti renwei de ‘yangjingbing xuefeng’” (Beware of “Designer Pidgin Scholarship”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 32 (December 1995), 5–13.Google Scholar

Dong, Liu. “Revisiting the Perils of ‘Designer Pidgin Scholarship,’” tr. Gloria Davies and Li Kaiyu. Pp. 87–108 in Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns.Google Scholar

Guisheng, Liu and Buzhou, Zhang, eds. Tai Gang ji haiwai wusi yanjiu lunzhu xieyao (Selection of Essential Taiwan, Hong Kong, and Overseas Research Works on May Fourth). Beijing: Jiaoyu kexue chubanshe, 1989.Google Scholar

Junning, Liu. “Baoshou de Baike, ziyou de Baike” (The Conservative Burke and the Liberal Burke), Dushu (Reading), no. 3 (1995), 77–85.Google Scholar

Junning, Liu. Baoshou zhuyi (Conservatism). Beijing: Zhongguo shehui kexue chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Junning, Liu. “Dang minzhu fang’ai ziyou de shihou” (When Democracy Obstructs Freedom), Dushu (Reading), no. 11 (1993), 74–80.Google Scholar

Liu, Kang. “Is There an Alternative to (Capitalist) Globalization? The Debate about Modernity in China,” Boundary 2 23.3 (1996), 193–218.Google Scholar

Liu, Lydia H. Translingual Practice: Literature, National Culture, and Translated Modernity—China 1900–1937. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1995.Google Scholar

Liu, Qingfeng. “The Topography of Intellectual Culture in 1990s Mainland China: A Survey,” tr. Gloria Davies. Pp. 47–70 in Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns.Google Scholar

Liu, Xiaobo. “China’s Neo-political Conservatism in the 1990s,” China Strategic Review 1.9 (December 1996), 11–15.Google Scholar

Lovell, Julia. The Politics of Cultural Capital: China’s Quest for a Nobel Prize in Literature. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2006.Google Scholar

Lu, Jiandong. Chen Yinke de zuihou ershi nian (Chen Yinke’s Last Twenty Years). Beijing: Sanlian shudian, 1995.Google Scholar

Lu, Sheldon Hsiao-peng. “Global POSTmodernIZATION: The Intellectual, the Artist, and China’s Condition.” Pp. 145–74 in Dirlik and Zhang, eds., Postmodernism and China.Google Scholar

Lu, Sheldon Hsiao-peng. “Postmodernity, Popular Culture, and the Intellectual: A Report on Post-Tiananmen China,” Boundary 2 23.2 (1996), 139–69.Google Scholar

Lu, Wei. “Taizidang paozhi ‘shizheng gangling’ shimo” (How the Princelings Launched Their “Political Platform”), Qianshao (Front Line), no. 2 (February 1992), 92–93. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 32–34.Google Scholar

Luo, Rongqu, ed. Cong “Xihua” dao xiandaihua: Wusi yilai youguan Zhongguo de wenhua quxiang he fazhan daolu lunzheng wenxuan (From “Westernization” to Modernization: Selections from the Debate on China’s Cultural Trends and Development since May Fourth). Beijing: Beijing daxue chubanshe, 1990.Google Scholar

Lynch, Catherine, Marks, Robert B., and Pickowicz, Paul G., “Introduction: Chinese Radicalism in Historical Context.” Pp. 1–9 in Lynch, Marks, and Pickowicz, eds. Radicalism, Revolution and Reform in Modern China: Essays in Honor of Maurice Meisner. Lanham, MD: Lexington, 2011.Google Scholar

Lyotard, Jean-François. The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge, tr. Bennington, Geoff. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Baozhu, Ma and Zhaogai, Wei, eds., “Zhengque renshi Zhongguo jindaishi shang de geming yu gailiang” (Correctly Understanding Revolution and Reform in Modern Chinese History), Guangming ribao (Enlightenment Daily), March 12, 1996, 5.Google Scholar

Ma, Shu Yun. “The Rise and Fall of Neo-authoritarianism in China,” China Information 5.3 (1990), 1–18.Google Scholar

Ma, Yong. “Jindai lishi renwu yanjiu” (Research on Personages in Modern History). Pp. 659–83 in Zeng Yeying, ed., Wushi nian lai de Zhongguo jindaishi yanjiu.Google Scholar

Ma, Yong. “Yan Fu wannian sixiang yanbian zhi chonggu” (A Re-evaluation of the Intellectual Development of Yan Fu in His Later Years), Zhexue yanjiu (Philosophy Research), no. 4 (1992), 46–53.Google Scholar

Ma, Yong. 1898 nian nachang weisui zhengbian (The Aborted Coup of 1898). Nanjing: Jiangsu renmin chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

MacFarquhar, Roderick. “The Post-Confucian Challenge,” Economist, February 9, 1980, 67–72.Google Scholar

MacFarquhar, Roderick and Schoenhals, Michael. Mao’s Last Revolution. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 2006.Google Scholar

Makeham, John. Lost Soul: “Confucianism” in Contemporary Chinese Academic Discourse. Cambridge, MA: Asia Center, Harvard University, 2008.Google Scholar

Makeham, John, ed. New Confucianism: A Critical Examination. Houndmills: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003.Google Scholar

Makeham, John. “The New Datong.” Pp. 55–78 in Makeham, Lost Soul.Google Scholar

Makeham, John. “The Retrospective Creation of New Confucianism.” Pp. 25–53 in Makeham, ed., New Confucianism.Google Scholar

Mandelbaum, Michael. “Coup de Grace: The End of the Soviet Union,” Foreign Affairs 71.1 (1992), 164–83.Google Scholar

Manela, Erez. The Wilsonian Moment: Self-Determination and the International Origins of Anticolonial Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.Google Scholar

Mannheim, Karl. “Conservative Thought.” Pp. 132–222 in Mannheim, From Karl Mannheim, ed. Wolff, Kurt H.. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1971. Originally published in Karl Mannheim, Essays on Sociology and Social Psychology, ed. Paul Kecskemeti. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1953.Google Scholar

Mannheim, Karl. “The Problem of Generations.” Pp. 276–322 in Mannheim, Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge, ed. Kecskemeti, Paul. London: Routledge Paul, 1952 [1927–28].Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong. “Lun renmin minzhu zhuanzheng,” July 30, 1949 (On the People’s Democratic Dictatorship). Pp. 4.1469–82 in Mao Zedong xuanji (Selected Works of Mao Zedong). Beijing: Renmin chubanshe, 1991.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong. “The May Fourth Movement,” May 1939. Pp. 2.237–40 in Selected Works of Mao Zedong. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1965.Google Scholar

Mao, Zedong. “Report on an Investigation of the Peasant Movement in Hunan.” Pp. 1.23–58 in Selected Works of Mao Tse-tung. Peking: Foreign Languages Press, 1967.Google Scholar

Maruyama, Masao. Nihon seiji shisōshi kenkyū (Studies on the History of Japanese Political Thought). Tōkyō: Tōkyō Daigaku Shuppankai, 1952.Google Scholar

McCormick, Barrett L. and Kelly, David. “The Limits of Anti-liberalism,” Journal of Asian Studies 53.3 (August 1994), 804–31.Google Scholar

McGrath, Jason. Postsocialist Modernity: Chinese Cinema, Literature, and Criticism in the Market Age. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2008.Google Scholar

Meisner, Maurice. Marxism, Maoism, and Utopianism: Eight Essays. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press, 1982.Google Scholar

Meissner, Werner. “New Intellectual Currents in the People’s Republic of China.” Pp. 3–24 in Teather, David C. B. and Yee, Herbert S., eds., China in Transition: Issues and Policies. New York: St. Martin’s, 1999.Google Scholar

Fanhua, Meng. “Wenhua bengkui shidai de taowang yu guiyi: Jiushi niandai wenhua de xin baoshou zhuyi jingshen” (The Exile and Conversion of the Era of Cultural Collapse: The Neoconservative Spirit of the Culture of the 1990s). Pp. 287–92 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Zhongguo wenhua yanjiu (Chinese Culture Research), no. 2 (1994), 52–56, 6.Google Scholar

Metzger, Thomas A. A Cloud across the Pacific: Essays on the Clash between Chinese and Western Political Theories Today. Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Metzger, Thomas A. Escape from Predicament: Neo-Confucianism and China’s Evolving Political Culture. New York: Columbia University Press, 1977. This book was translated as [Mo Zike], Baituo kunjing: Xin ruxue yu Zhongguo zhengzhi wenhua de yanjin (Escape from Predicament), tr. Yan Shi’an, Gao Hua, and Huang Donglan. Nanjing: Jiangsu renmin chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Misra, Kalpana. “Curing the Sickness and Saving the Party: Neo-Maoism and Neo-conservatism in the 1990s.” Pp. 133–60 in Hua, Shiping, ed., Chinese Political Culture 1989–2000. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 2001.Google Scholar

Misra, Kalpana. From Post-Maoism to Post-Marxism: The Erosion of Official Ideology in Deng’s China. London: Routledge, 1998.Google Scholar

Mitter, Rana. A Bitter Revolution: China’s Struggle with the Modern World. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Moody, Peter R. Conservative Thought in Contemporary China. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2007.Google Scholar

Morishima, Michio. “The Power of Confucian Capitalism,” Observer (London), June 1978.Google Scholar

Muller, Jerry Z. “Introduction: What Is Conservative Social and Political Thought?” Pp. 3–31 in Muller, , ed., Conservatism: An Anthology of Social and Political Thought from David Hume to the Present. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1997.Google Scholar

Murthy, Viren. “Modernity against Modernity: Wang Hui’s Critical History of Chinese Thought,” Modern Intellectual History 3.1 (April 2006), 137–65.Google Scholar

Murthy, Viren. The Political Philosophy of Zhang Taiyan: The Resistance of Consciousness. Leiden: Brill, 2011.Google Scholar

Neville, Robert Cummings. Boston Confucianism: Portable Tradition in the Late-Modern World. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2000.Google Scholar

Ng, On-cho and Edward Wang, Q.. “Prologue.” Pp. vii–xxiii in Ng and Wang, Mirroring the Past: The Writing and Use of History in Imperial China. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Nisbet, Robert A. Social Change and History: Aspects of the Western Theory of Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1969.Google Scholar

Oakeshott, Michael. Rationalism in Politics, and Other Essays. London: Methuen, 1962.Google Scholar

Olsen, Niklas. History in the Plural: An Introduction to the Work of Reinhart Koselleck. New York: Berghahn Books, 2012.Google Scholar

Owen, Stephen. “What Is World Poetry?” New Republic 203.21 (November 19, 1990), 28–32.Google Scholar

Petracca, Mark M. and Xiong, Mong. “The Concept of Chinese Neo-authoritarianism: An Exploration and Democratic Critique,” Asian Survey 30.11 (1990), 1099–1117.Google Scholar

Pfister, Lauren F. “A Modern Chinese Philosophy Built upon Critically Received Traditions: Feng Youlan’s New Principle-Centered Learning and the Question of Its Relationship to Contemporary New Ruist (‘Confucian’) Philosophies,” Pp. 165–84 in Makeham, ed., New Confucianism.Google Scholar

Pickowicz, Paul G. “Huang Jianxin and the Notion of Postsocialism.” Pp. 57–87 in Browne, Nick et al., eds., New Chinese Cinemas: Forms, Identities, Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.Google Scholar

Pilbeam, Bruce. “Conservatism and Postmodernism: Consanguineous Relations or ‘Different’ Voices?” Journal of Political Ideologies 6.1 (2001), 33–54.Google Scholar

Pincus, Steven C. A. 1688: The First Modern Revolution. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. “Aestheticism, Perfectionism and Utopianism.” Pp. 1.157–68 in Popper, K. R., The Open Society and Its Enemies. 2 vols., 4th rev. ed. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1963.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. [Ka’er Bopu’er]. Caixiang yu fanbo (Conjectures and Refutations), tr. Jichong, Fu et al. Shanghai: Shanghai yiwen chubanshe, 1986.Google Scholar

Popper, Karl. [Ba Bo]. Kaifang shehui ji qi diren (The Open Society and Its Enemies), tr. Yingming, Li and Wenrui, Zhuang. Taipei: Guiguan tushu gongsi, 1986.Google Scholar

Prall, Stuart E. The Bloodless Revolution: England, 1688. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1985.Google Scholar

Puett, Michael. “Classical Chinese Historical Thought.” Pp. 34–46 in Duara, Prasenjit, Murthy, Viren, and Sartori, Andrew, eds., A Companion to Global Historical Thought. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2014.Google Scholar

Pusey, James Reeve. China and Charles Darwin. Cambridge, MA: Council on East Asian Studies, Harvard University, 1983.Google Scholar

Mo, Qi, ed. Xin quanwei zhuyi: Dui Zhongguo dalu weilai mingyun de lunzheng (Neo-authoritarianism: Debates on the Future Fate of Mainland China). Taipei: Tangshan chubanshe, 1991.Google Scholar

Qian, Kun. Imperial-Time-Order: Literature, Intellectual History, and China’s Road to Empire. Leiden: Brill, 2016.Google Scholar

Quirin, Michael. “Yü Yingshi, das Politische und die Politik” (Yü Yingshi, the Political, and Politics), Minima Sinica: Zeitschrift zum Chinesischen Geist (Minima Sinica: Journal for the Chinese Mind) 6.1 (1994), 27–69.Google Scholar

Rahav, Shakhar. The Rise of Political Intellectuals in Modern China: May Fourth Societies and the Roots of Mass-Party Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.Google Scholar

“Review Symposium: Thomas A. Metzger’s Escape from Predicament.” Journal of Asian Studies 39.2 (February 1980), 237–90.Google Scholar

Robertson, David. “Neo.” Pp. 337–38 in Robertson, The Routledge Dictionary of Politics. London: Routledge, 2004.Google Scholar

Rosen, Stanley. “Guest Editor’s Introduction,” Chinese Law and Government 30.6 (November–December 1997), 3–7.Google Scholar

Rosen, Stanley, ed. “Nationalism and Neoconservatism in China in the 1990s,” Chinese Law and Government 30.6 (November–December 1997), 3–100.Google Scholar

Rosen, Stanley and Zou, Gary, eds. “The Chinese Debate on the New Authoritarianism,” Chinese Sociology and Anthropology 23.2 (Winter 1990–91); 23.3 (Spring 1991); 23.4 (Summer 1991); and 24.1 (Fall 1991).Google Scholar

Rossiter, Clinton. Conservatism in America. Melbourne: Heinemann, 1955.Google Scholar

Ming, Ruan. “Cong xin quanwei zhuyi dao xin baoshou zhuyi” (From New Authoritarianism to New Conservatism), Kaifang zazhi (Open Magazine), no. 2 (February 1992), 28–32. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 58–70.Google Scholar

Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books, 1978.Google Scholar

Sakwa, Richard. The Rise and Fall of the Soviet Union, 1917–1991. London: Routledge, 1999.Google Scholar

Saussy, Haun. “Postmodernism in China: A Sketch and Some Queries.” Pp. 128–58 in Wen-hsin, Yeh, ed., Cross-Cultural Readings of Chineseness: Narratives, Images, and Interpretations of the 1990s. Berkeley: Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 2000.Google Scholar

Sautman, Barry. “Sirens of the Strongman: Neo-authoritarianism in Recent Chinese Political Theory,” China Quarterly, no. 129 (1992), 72–102.Google Scholar

Schama, Simon. Citizens: A Chronicle of the French Revolution. New York: Knopf, 1989.Google Scholar

Schell, Orville and Delury, John. Wealth and Power: China’s Long March to the Twenty-First Century. London: Little, Brown, 2013.Google Scholar

Schneider, Axel. “Between Dao and History: Two Chinese Historians in Search of a Modern Identity for China,” History and Theory 35.4 (December 1996), 54–73.Google Scholar

Schneider, Axel. “Bridging the Gap: Attempts at Constructing a ‘New’ Historical-Cultural Identity in the PRC,” East Asian History, no. 22 (December 2001), 129–44.Google Scholar

Schneider, Laurence A. “National Essence and the New Intelligentsia.” Pp. 57–89 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Schoenhals, Michael. Doing Things with Words in Chinese Politics: Five Studies. Berkeley: Center for Chinese Studies, Institute of East Asian Studies, University of California, 1992.Google Scholar

Schubert, Gunter. “Was Ist Neokonservativismus? Notizen zum Politischen Denken in der VR China in den 90er Jahren” (What Is Neoconservatism? Notes on Political Thought in the PRC during the 1990s), Asien (Asia) 65 (October 1997), 57–74.Google Scholar

Schumpeter, Joseph A. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy, 5th ed. London: Allen & Unwin, 1976 [1942].Google Scholar

Schwarcz, Vera. The Chinese Enlightenment: Intellectuals and the Legacy of the May Fourth Movement of 1919. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1986.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin I. “History in Chinese Culture: Some Comparative Reflections,” History and Theory 35.4 (December 1996), 23–33.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin I.. In Search of Wealth and Power: Yen Fu and the West. Cambridge, MA: Belknap, 1964.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin I.. “Notes on Conservatism in General and in China in Particular.” Pp. 3–21 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Schwartz, Benjamin I.. “Themes in Intellectual History: May Fourth and After.” Pp. 97–141 in Goldman, Merle and Lee, Leo Ou-Fan, eds., An Intellectual History of Modern China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.Google Scholar

Jiansun, Sha and Shuduo, Gong, eds. Zou shenme lu: Guanyu Zhongguo jinxiandai lishi shang de ruogan zhongda shifei wenti (Which Way to Go: Some Major Disputes on Modern Chinese History). Ji’nan: Shandong renmin chubanshe, 1997.Google Scholar

Shambaugh, David. China Goes Global: The Partial Power. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.Google Scholar

Sheng, Anfeng. “Traveling Theory, or, Transforming Theory: Metamorphosis of Postcolonialism in China,” Neohelicon 34.2 (2007), 115–36.Google Scholar

Hong, Sheng. “Cong minzu zhuyi dao tianxia zhuyi” (From Nationalism to Cosmopolitanism), Zhanlüe yu guanli (Strategy and Management), no. 1 (1996), 14–19. Translated in Chinese Law and Government 30.6 (November–December 1997), 31–42.Google Scholar

Hong, Sheng. “Shenme shi wenming” (What Is Civilization?), Zhanlüe yu guanli (Strategy and Management), no. 5 (1995), 88–98.Google Scholar

Shi, Zhong. “Zhongguo de minzu zhuyi he Zhongguo de weilai” (Chinese Nationalism and the Future of China), Mingbao yuekan (Mingbao Monthly), no. 9 (1996). Translated in Chinese Law and Government 30.6 (November–December 1997), 8–27 [translated from the original, which differed from the version published in Mingbao Yuekan].Google Scholar

Shils, Edward. Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar

Sleeboom-Faulkner, Margaret. The Chinese Academy of Social Sciences (CASS): Shaping the Reforms, Academia and China (1977–2003). Leiden: Brill, 2007.Google Scholar

Qiang, Song, Zangzang, Zhang, Bian, Qiao, et al. Zhongguo keyi shuo bu: Lengzhan hou shidai de zhengzhi yu qinggan jueze (China Can Say No: Political and Emotional Choices in the Post–Cold War Era). Beijing: Zhonghua gongshang lianhe chubanshe, 1996.Google Scholar

Song, Xianlin. “Reconstructing the Confucian Ideal in 1980s China: The ‘Culture Craze’ and New Confucianism.” Pp. 81–104 in Makeham, ed., New Confucianism.Google Scholar

Special issue: “Greater China.” China Quarterly, no. 136 (December 1993).Google Scholar

Spencer, Herbert. The Principles of Sociology, 2nd ed. London: Williams and Norgate, 1877–97.Google Scholar

Spira, Ivo. A Conceptual History of Chinese -Isms: The Modernization of Ideological Discourse, 1895–1925. Leiden: Brill, 2015.Google Scholar

S.R.G. “Preface to the Issue ‘The Living Tree: The Changing Meaning of Being Chinese Today,’” Daedalus 120.2 (Spring 1991), v–viii.Google Scholar

Strafella, Giorgio. Intellectual Discourse in Reform Era China: The Debate on the Spirit of the Humanities in the 1990s. London: Routledge, 2017.Google Scholar

Stromberg, Roland N. European History since 1789, 3rd ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar

Wei, Su. “Yifen taizidang jieban de baipishu” (A White Paper on the Princeling Faction’s Succession), Zhongguo zhi chun (China Spring), no. 1 (January 1992), 28–29. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 48–51.Google Scholar

Su, Xiaokang and Wang, Luxiang. Deathsong of the River: A Reader’s Guide to the Chinese TV Series Heshang. Ithaca, NY: East Asia Program, Cornell University, 1991.Google Scholar

Su, Xiaokang and Wang, Luxiang. Heshang (River Elegy). Beijing: Xiandai chubanshe, 1988.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Michael J. “Democracy and Developmentalism: Contending Struggles over Political Change in Dengist China, 1978–1995,” Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1995.Google Scholar

Sullivan, Michael J.. “The Impact of Western Political Thought in Chinese Political Discourse on Transitions from Leninism, 1986–1992,” World Affairs 157.2 (October 1994), 79–91.Google Scholar

Guodong, Sun. “Du Jiang Yihua ‘jijin yu baoshou’ shu hou” (After Reading Jiang Yihua’s Writings on “Conservative and Radical”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 11 (June 1992), 141–43.Google Scholar

Tang, Xiaobing. “The Function of New Theory: What Does It Mean to Talk about Postmodernism in China?” Pp. 278–99 in Liu, Kang and Tang, Xiaobing, eds., Politics, Ideology, and Literary Discourse in Modern China: Theoretical Interventions and Cultural Critique. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993.Google Scholar

Yijie, Tang, ed. Lun chuantong yu fan chuantong: Wusi qishi zhounian jinian wenxuan (On Tradition and Anti-tradition: Selected Works on the Commemoration of the Seventieth Anniversary of May Fourth). Taipei: Lianjing chuban shiye gongsi, 1989.Google Scholar

Yijie, Tang. “Some Reflections on New Confucianism in Mainland Chinese Culture of the 1990s,” tr. Gloria Davies. Pp. 123–34 in Davies, ed., Voicing Concerns.Google Scholar

Dongfeng, Tao. “Baoshou ziyou zhuyi: Zhongguo wenhua jiangou de di sanzhong xuanze” (Conservative Liberalism: The Third Choice for Chinese Cultural Construction). Pp. 475–85 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Kaifang shidai (Open Times), no. 5 (1997), 32–37.Google Scholar

Dongfeng, Tao. “Ershi shiji Zhongguo de baoshou zhuyi: Jianlun ziyou yu chuantong zhi guanxi” (The Conservatism of Twentieth-Century China: On the Relation between Liberty and Tradition). Pp. 217–61 in Tao Dongfeng, Wenhua yu meixue de shiye jiaorong: Tao Dongfeng xueshu zixuanji (The Fusion of the Horizons of Culture and Aesthetics: Self-Selections of Tao Dongfeng’s Academic Works). Fuzhou: Fujian jiaoyu chubanshe, 2000.Google Scholar

Dongfeng, Tao and Yuanpu, Jin. Chanshi Zhongguo de jiaolü: Zhuanxing shidai de wenhua jiedu (The Anxiety of Interpreting China/Interpreting China’s Anxiety: Cultural Interpretations of the Transitional Era). Beijing: Zhongguo guoji guangbo chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Terrill, Ross. The Life of Mao. www.overdrive.com/search?q=E32A112B-2D31-482A-A8AA-16A00E298663.Google Scholar

Townsend, James. “Chinese Nationalism.” Pp. 1–30 in Unger, Jonathan, ed., Chinese Nationalism. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1996.Google Scholar

Tribe, Keith. “Introduction.” Pp. vii–xx in Koselleck, Futures Past.Google Scholar

Tsai, Wen-hui. “New Authoritarianism, Neo-conservatism, and Anti–Peaceful Evolution: Mainland China’s Resistance to Political Modernization,” Issues & Studies 28.12 (1992), 1–22.Google Scholar

Tsu, Jing. Failure, Nationalism, and Literature: The Making of Modern Chinese Identity, 1895–1937. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2005.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. Confucian Ethics Today: The Singapore Challenge. Singapore: Curriculum Development Institute of Singapore, Federal Publications, 1984.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming], ed. Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity: Moral Education and Economic Culture in Japan and the Four Mini-Dragons. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “‘Cultural China’: The Periphery as the Center,” Daedalus 120.2 (1991), 1–32.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “Hsiung Shih-li’s Quest for Authentic Existence.” Pp. 242–75 in Furth, ed., Limits of Change.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “Huajie qimeng xintai” (Beyond the Enlightenment Mentality), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 2 (December 1990), 12–13.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “Introduction.” Pp. 1–10 in Tu, ed., Confucian Traditions in East Asian Modernity.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “Introduction: Cultural Perspectives,” Daedalus 122.2 (Spring 1993), vii–xiv.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. Renxing yu ziwo xiuyang (Humanity and Self-Cultivation). Beijing: Zhongguo heping chubanshe, 1988.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. Ruxue disanqi fazhan de qianjing wenti: Dalu jiangxue, wennan, he taolun (Prospective Issues in the Third Epoch of Confucianism: Mainland Lectures, Questions, and Discussions). Taipei: Lianjing chuban shiye gongsi, 1989.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming], ed. The Triadic Chord: Confucian Ethics, Industrial East Asia, and Max Weber: Proceedings of the 1987 Singapore Conference on Confucian Ethics and the Modernisation of Industrial East Asia. Singapore: Institute of East Asian Philosophies, 1991.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “‘Wenhua Zhongguo’ chutan” (Probing “Cultural China”), Jiushi niandai (The Nineties), no. 6 (June 1990), 60–61.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming [Du Weiming]. “Wenhua Zhongguo yu huayi zhishi fenzi de ‘ziwo yishi’” (Cultural China and Chinese Intellectuals’ “Consciousness of Self”), Shijie ribao (World Journal), September 22, 1991.Google Scholar

Tu, Wei-ming, Hejtmanek, Milan, Wachman, Alan, et al., eds. The Confucian World Observed: A Contemporary Discussion of Confucian Humanism in East Asia. Honolulu: East-West Center, University of Hawai’i, 1992.Google Scholar

Turner, Frank M. “Introduction: Edmund Burke: The Political Actor Thinking.” Pp. xi–xliv in Burke, Edmund, Reflections on the Revolution in France, ed. Turner, Frank M.. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Eddy, U. “The Making of Chinese Intellectuals: Representations and Organization in the Thought Reform Campaign,” China Quarterly, no. 192 (2007), 971–89.Google Scholar

Vickers, Edward. “Museums and Nationalism in Contemporary China,” Compare 37.3 (2007), 365–82.Google Scholar

Viereck, Peter. Conservatism from John Adams to Churchill. Princeton, NJ: Van Nostrand, 1956.Google Scholar

Vogel, Ezra F. The Four Little Dragons: The Spread of Industrialization in East Asia. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1991.Google Scholar

Vogel, Ezra F. Japan as Number One: Lessons for America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1979.Google Scholar

von Brunner, Otto, Conze, Werner, and Koselleck, Reinhart, eds. Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe: Historisches Lexikon zur politisch-sozialen Sprache in Deutschland (Basic Historical Concepts: A Dictionary on Historical Principles of Political and Social Language in Germany). Stuttgart: Klett-Cotta, 1972–97.Google Scholar

Waldron, Arthur. “Warlordism versus Federalism: The Revival of a Debate?,” China Quarterly, no. 121 (1990), 116–28.Google Scholar

Wang, Ban. Illuminations from the Past: Trauma, Memory and History in Modern China. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar

Wang, Chaohua. “Introduction: Minds of the Nineties.” Pp. 11–45 in Wang, Chaohua, ed., One China, Many Paths. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar

Wang, David Der-wei. “Chinese Literature from 1841 to 1937.” Pp. 413–564 in Chang, Kang-I Sun and Owen, Stephen, eds., The Cambridge History of Chinese Literature, Volume II: From 1375. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010.Google Scholar

Fansen, Wang [Wang Fan-shen]. “‘Zhuyi shidai de lailin’: Zhongguo jindai sixiangshi de yige guanjian fazhan” (The Advent of the “Age of -Isms”: A Key Development in the History of Modern Chinese Thought), Dong Ya guannianshi jikan (Journal of the History of Ideas in East Asia), no. 4 (2013), 3–7 and 9–88.Google Scholar

Wang, Fanshen. “Evolving Prescriptions for Social Life in the Late Qing and Early Republic: From Qunxue to Society,” tr. Judge, Joan. Chinese Studies in History 29.4 (Summer 1996), 73–99.Google Scholar

Wang, Frédéric. “Le confucianisme et la Chine actuelle: l’héritage de Zhang Dainian (1909–2004)” (Confucianism and China Today: The Legacy of Zhang Dainian (1909–2004)), Histoire et Missions Chrétiennes (History and Christian Missions), no. 2 (2011), 69–87, www.cairn.info/revue-histoire-monde-et-cultures-religieuses1-2011-2-page-69.htm.Google Scholar

Wang, Gungwu. The Chinese Intellectual: Past and Present. Singapore: Faculty of Arts and Sciences, National University of Singapore, 1983.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui. China’s New Order: Society, Politics, and Economy in Transition, ed. Huters, Theodore. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2003.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui. “Dangdai Zhongguo de sixiang zhuangkuang yu xiandaixing wenti,” Tianya (Frontiers), no. 5 (1997), 133–50. Translated by Rebecca Karl under the title “Contemporary Chinese Thought and the Question of Modernity,” in Wang, China’s New Order, ed. Theodore Huters, 139–187, and in Social Text 16.2 (Summer 1998), 9–44.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui. The End of the Revolution: China and the Limits of Modernity. London: Verso, 2009.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui. “The New Criticism.” Pp. 55–86 in Wang, Chaohua, ed., One China, Many Paths. London: Verso, 2003.Google Scholar

Wang, Hui and Yu, Guoliang, eds. Jiushi niandai de “houxue” lunzheng (The Debates in the 1990s on “Post-Isms”). Hong Kong: Chinese University of Hong Kong Press, 1998.Google Scholar

Hui, Wang and Tianwei, Zhang. “Wenhua pipan lilun yu dangdai Zhongguo minzu zhuyi wenti” (Cultural Criticism Theory and the Issue of Contemporary Chinese Nationalism), Zhanlüe yu guanli (Strategy and Management), no. 4 (1994), 17–20.Google Scholar

Wang, Jing. “Heshang and the Paradoxes of the Chinese Enlightenment.” Pp. 118–36 in Jing Wang, High Culture Fever.Google Scholar

Wang, Jing. High Culture Fever: Politics, Aesthetics, and Ideology in Deng’s China. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1996.Google Scholar

Wang, Juntao. “Reverse Course: Political Neo-conservatism and Regime Stability in Post-Tiananmen China,” Ph.D. diss., Columbia University, 2006.Google Scholar

Meng, Wang. “Duobi chonggao” (Shunning the Sublime), Dushu (Reading), no. 1 (1993), 10–17.Google Scholar

Wang, Ning. “The Mapping of Chinese Postmodernity.” Pp. 21–40 in Dirlik and Zhang, eds., Postmodernism and China.Google Scholar

Wang, Q. Edward. Inventing China through History: The May Fourth Approach to Historiography. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Rongzu, Wang. “Jijin yu baoshou zhuiyan” (Radicalism and Conservatism: Superfluous Words), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 11 (June 1992), 133–36.Google Scholar

Rongzu, Wang. “Ziyou zhuyi yu Zhongguo” (Liberalism and China), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 2 (December 1990), 33–37.Google Scholar

Wang, Shan. Disan zhi yanjing kan Zhongguo (Looking at China through a Third Eye). Taipei: Zhouzhi wenhua, 1994.Google Scholar

Shaoguang, Wang. “‘Baoshou’ yu ‘baoshou zhuyi’” (“Conservative” and “Conservatism”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 12 (August 1992), 135–38.Google Scholar

Shaoguang, Wang. “Qiubian paluan de xin baoshou sichao” (The Neoconservative Trend That Seeks Change and Fears Chaos), Zhongguo shibao zhoukan (China Times Weekly), March 8, 1992, 76–77.Google Scholar

Shaoguang, Wang. “Zai lun Zhongguo zhengfu jiqu nengli—Jianda Yang Dali, Cui Zhiyuan, Rao Yuqing, Xiao Geng zhu xiansheng” (Further Discussion on the Extractive Capacity of the Chinese Government: Reply to Yang Dali, Cui Zhiyuan, Rao Yuqing, and Xiao Geng), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 22 (April 1994), 129–36.Google Scholar

Wang, Shaoguang and Hu, Angang. Jiaqiang zhongyang zhengfu zai shichang jingji zhuanxing zhong de zhudao zuoyong: Guanyu Zhongguo guojia nengli de yanjiu baogao (Strengthening the Guiding Role of the Central Government in the Transition to a Market Economy: A Research Report on China’s State Capacity). Shenyang: Liaoning renmin chubanshe, 1993.Google Scholar

Wang, Shaoguang and Hu, Angang. The Political Economy of Uneven Development: The Case of China, ed. Selden, Mark. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1999.Google Scholar

Wang, Shaoguang and Hu, Angang. “Zhongguo zhengfu jiqu nengli de xiajiang ji qi houguo” (The Decrease in the Extractive Capacity of the Chinese Government and Its Consequences), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 21 (February 1994), 5–14.Google Scholar

Shi, Wang, ed. Yan Fu ji (Collected Works of Yan Fu), 5 vols. Beijing: Zhonghua shuju chubanshe, 1986. Originally published in Beijing by Shangwu yinshuguan chubanshe.Google Scholar

Wang, Shuren. “Wenhua de weiji, ronghe yu chongjian” (The Crisis, Reconciliation, and Reconstruction of Culture), Yuandao (True Way) 1 (1994), 95–114.Google Scholar

Sirui, Wang. “Jinri Zhongguo de xin baoshou zhuyi” (Neoconservatism in Today’s China). Pp. 406–21 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Beijing wenxue (Beijing Literature), no. 3 (1999), 81–88.Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaoming. “The Politics of Translation: Modes of Organization in the Chinese Translation Movement of the 1980s,” tr. Dean, Kenneth. Pp. 269–300 in Sakai, Naoki and Hanawa, Yukiko, eds., Specters of the West and the Politics of Translation. Ithaca, NY: Traces Editorial Office, Cornell University, 2001.Google Scholar

Wang, Xiaoming, ed. Renwen jingshen xunsi lu (Collection of Reflections on the Humanist Spirit). Shanghai: Wenhui chubanshe, 1996.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuanhua. “Guanyu jinnian de fansi dawen” (Answering Questions about Reflections in Recent Years), Xueshu jilin (Academic Collection), no. 3. Shanghai: Shanghai yuandong chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Wang, Yuanhua. “Wei ‘wusi’ jingshen yi bian” (In Defense of the “May Fourth” Spirit). Pp. 1–27 in Lin Yü-sheng et al., Wusi: Duoyuan de fansi.Google Scholar

Yuanhua, Wang and Hui, Li. “Duiyu ‘wusi’ de zai renshi da kewen” (Answering Questions on the Re-acknowledgment of “May Fourth”). Pp. 271–86 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Wenhui dushu zhoubao (Wenhui Reading Weekly), May 1, 1999, 8–9.Google Scholar

Yuechuan, Wang. “Dangdai wenhua yanjiu zhong de jijin yu baoshou zhi wei” (The Link between Radicalism and Conservatism in Research on Contemporary Culture). Pp. 422–38 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang.Google Scholar

Yuechuan, Wang. “Xuyan” (Preface). Pp. 1–13 in Zhongguo houxiandai huayu (The Chinese Postmodernism Discourse). Guangzhou: Zhongshan daxue chubanshe, 2004.Google Scholar

Zhaojun, Wang. “Xin baoshou zhuyi yu dalu zhishi fenzi” (New Conservatism and the Intellectuals in Mainland China), Zhongguo luntan (China Forum), July 1, 1992, 106–14. Translated by David Kelly in Chinese Law and Government 29.2 (March–April 1996), 83–96.Google Scholar

Waterman, Harold. “Which Way to Go? Four Strategies for Democratization in Chinese Intellectual Circles,” China Information 5.1 (1990), 14–33.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. Economy and Society: An Outline of Interpretive Sociology, ed. Roth, Günther and Wittich, Claus. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1978.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. Parsons, Talcott. New York: Scribner, 1958.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism, tr. Kalberg, Stephen. New York: Columbia University Press, 2011.Google Scholar

Weber, Max. The Religion of China: Confucianism and Taoism, tr. Gerth, Hans. New York: Free Press, 1968.Google Scholar

Wende, Peter. “Radikalismus” (Radicalism). Pp. 5.113–33 in von Brunner, Conze, and Koselleck, eds., Geschichtliche Grundbegriffe.Google Scholar

Wenzhe, . “Jiuyuan le, guoxue!” (National Studies, It Has Been a Long Time!), Renmin ribao (People’s Daily), August 18, 1993, 1.Google Scholar

Whitehead, Alfred North. Science and the Modern World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1953 [1926].Google Scholar

Wright, Mary Clabaugh. The Last Stand of Chinese Conservatism: The T’ung-Chih Restoration, 1862–1874. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.Google Scholar

Jiaxiang, Wu. “Xin quanwei zhuyi shuping” (Commenting on New Authoritarianism). Pp. 4–8 in Qi Mo, ed., Xin quanwei zhuyi.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Chaoyue zuoyou jijin zhuyi: Zouchu Zhongguo zhuanxing de kunjing (Beyond Left and Right Radicalism: Moving away from the Predicament of China’s Transformation). Hangzhou: Zhejiang daxue chubanshe, 2012.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Chuantong wenhua duoxing dui Zhongguo xiandaihua de sanzhong zuzhang” (The Three Obstacles to Chinese Modernization in the Inertia of the Traditional Culture). Pp. 338–43 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Cong zhengzhi langman zhuyi dao zhengzhi jijin zhuyi: Dui Zhongguo zaoqi yihui minzhu sichao de lishi kaocha” (From Political Romanticism to Political Radicalism: Historical Research on the Early Parliamentary Democracy Trend). Pp. 265–80 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Zhongguo shehui kexue jikan (China Social Sciences Quarterly), no. 2 (1993), 82–89, under the title “Cong langman de minzu zhuyi dao zhengzhi jijin zhuyi: Dui Zhongguo zaoqi yihui minzhu sichao de lishi kaocha” (From Romantic Nationalism to Political Radicalism: Historical Research on the Early Parliamentary Democracy Trend).Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Dangdai Zhongguo xin baoshou zhuyi de sixiang yuanyuan” (The Intellectual Origins of Contemporary Chinese Neoconservatism), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 40 (April 1997), 126–35.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Jindai sixiangshi shang de ‘wenti yu zhuyi’ zhenglun de zai sikao” (Rethinking the Debate on “Problems and -Isms” in Modern Intellectual History). Pp. 142–57 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Lishi jujue langman: Xin baoshou zhuyi yu Zhongguo xiandaihua (History Rejects Romanticism: Neoconservatism and Chinese Modernization). Taipei: Zhiliang chubanshe, 1998.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Lishi jujue langman: Zhongguo gaige di’er sichao de jueqi” (History Rejects Romanticism: The Emergence of the Second Trend of Reform Thought in China). Pp. 109–22 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Zhongguo xiandaihua yanjiu (Research on Chinese Modernization), December 9, 1994. An abstract appeared in Beijing qingnianbao (Beijing Youth Daily), January 19, 1992, 6.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Lishixue zai Zhongguo biange shidai de yiyi” (The Meaning of Historical Studies in the Era of Chinese Reform). Pp. 359–64 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Shixue lilun (History Theory), no. 4 (1988), 14–17, under the title “Rang women peiyang ziji shenshang de yonggan zhongzi: Shixue fazhan shi wo guan (Let Us Cultivate Our Own Bare Seeds of Bravery: My View of the Development of History).Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Lun dangdai Zhongguo de langman zhuyi gaigeguan: Dui ‘zhidu juedinglun’ de piping” (On the Romantic Reform View in Contemporary China: A Criticism of “System Determinism”). Pp. 87–108 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally appeared in Zhishi fenzi (The Intellectual), no. 1 (1989), 69–72.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Minzu zhuyi yu Zhongguo zhuanxing shiqi de yishi xingtai” (Nationalism and Ideology during China’s Transitional Era). Pp. 350–58 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Zhanlüe yu guanli (Strategy and Management), no. 4 (1994), 21–25.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. 1911 nian Zhongguo da geming (The Great Chinese Revolution of 1911). Beijing: Shehui kexue wenxian chubanshe, 2011.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “The Political Attitudes of the Various Strata in China’s Society and Their Prospects for the Future,” Chinese Economy 32.3 (1999), 56–78.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Rujia wenhua de kunjing: Jindai shidaifu yu Zhong Xi wenhua pengzhuang (The Dilemma of Confucian Culture: Modern Literati and the Collision of Chinese and Western Cultures). Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 2006.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Rujia wenhua de kunjing: Zhongguo jindai shidaifu yu Xifang tiaozhan (The Predicament of Confucian Culture: Modern Chinese Literati and the Challenge of the West). Chengdu: Sichuan renmin chubanshe, 1986.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Ruxue de sanzhong lishi xingtai” (The Three Historical Forms of Confucianism). Pp. 315–37 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Sixiangshi de meili” (The Charm of Intellectual History). Pp. 3–15 in Xiao, Zhishi fenzi yu guannian ren (Intellectuals and Men of Concepts). Tianjin: Tianjin renmin chubanshe, 2002. Also published in Kaifang shidai (Open Times), no. 1 (2002), 102–9.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Weiji zhong de biange: Qingmo xiandaihua jincheng zhong de jijin yu baoshou (Reform amidst Crisis: Radicalism and Conservatism in the Process of Late Qing Modernization). Shanghai: Shanghai sanlian shudian, 1999.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Wenhua shifan yu xiandaihua de kun’e” (Cultural Anomie and the Conundrum of Modernization). Pp. 344–49 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Wuxu bianfa de zai fanxing: Jianlun zaoqi zhengzhi jijin zhuyi de wenhua genyuan (Re-examining the Hundred Days Reform Movement: Discussing the Cultural Roots of Early Political Radicalism). Pp. 121–41 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Zhanlüe yu guanli (Strategy and Management), no. 4 (1995), 11–20.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Xiao Gongqin ji (Collected Works of Xiao Gongqin). Ha’erbin: Heilongjiang jiaoyu chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “‘Yan Fu beilun’ yu jindai baoshou zhuyi biange guan” (The “Yan Fu Paradox” and the Conservative View of Change in Modern Times). Pp. 18–41 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Zhongguo yanjiu (China Research), no. 6 (1996).Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Yan Fu dui Zhongguo xiandaihua de sikao ji qi qishi” (Yan Fu’s Reflections on China’s Modernization and Its Enlightenment), Zhongguo qingnianbao (China Youth Daily), February 6, 1991, 3.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Yu zhengzhi langman zhuyi gaobie (Parting with Political Romanticism). Wuhan: Hubei jiaoyu chubanshe, 2001.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. Zhishi fenzi yu guannian ren (Intellectuals and Men of Concepts). Tianjin: Tianjin renmin chubanshe, 2002.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zhongguo xin baoshou zhuyi de sixiang yuanyuan” (The Intellectual Origins of Chinese Neoconservatism). Pp. 25–40 in Xiao, Yu zhengzhi langman zhuyi gaobie.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zhongguo zaoqi xiandaihua de cuozhe ji qi lishi houguo” (The Setbacks in China’s Early Modernization and the Historical Results). Pp. 199–223 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published in Nianqun, Yang, ed. Jiawu bainian cha: Duoyuan shiye xia de Zhong Ri zhanzheng (Investigating 1895 One Hundred Years Later: The Sino-Japanese War under a Pluralist Vision). Beijing: Zhishi chubanshe, 1995.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zhuanxingqi Zhongguo renwen zhishi fenzi de sizhong leixing” (Four Types of Intellectuals in the Humanities in Transitional China). Pp. 182–89 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. Originally published as “Gaige zhuanxingqi Zhongguo zhishi fenzi de leixing fenhua” (A Typological Distinction of Intellectuals in Reform Transitional China), in Tansuo yu zhengming (Exploration and Contention), no. 8 (1994), 3–5.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zixu” (Preface). Pp. 1–16 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zixu” (Preface). Pp. 1–13 in Xiao, Yu zhengzhi langman zhuyi gaobie.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zouxiang chengshu: Zhongguo gaige de fansi yu zhanwang” (Toward Ripening: Reflections on and Prospects for the Chinese Reforms). Pp. 123–39 in Xiao, Xiao Gongqin ji. An earlier version of the article appeared in Zhongguo shibao zhoukan (China Times Weekly), February 21, 1993, and February 28, 1993. An abstract was published in Beijing qingnianbao (Beijing Youth Daily), May 13, 1993.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao. “Zouxiang xin baoshou zhuyi” (Toward Neoconservatism), Zhongguo shibao zhoukan (China Times Weekly), February 21, 1993, 46–51 and February 28, 1993, 36–39.Google Scholar

Gongqin, Xiao and Wei, Zhu. “Tongku de liangnan xuanze: Guanyu ‘xin quanwei zhuyi’ lilun dawenlu” (A Painful Dilemma: A Record of Questions and Answers on “Neo-authoritarianism”). Pp. 13–19 in Qi Mo, ed., Xin quanwei zhuyi. Originally published in Wenhui bao (Wenhui Daily), January 17, 1989.Google Scholar

Wujun, Xie. “Ping Zhongguo dangdai de baoshou zhuyi sichao” (Commenting on the Contemporary Chinese Conservative Trend), Dangdai sichao (Contemporary Trends), no. 4 (2001), 13–29.Google Scholar

Ben, Xu. “‘Di san shijie piping’ zai dangjin Zhongguo de chujing” (The Predicament of “Third World Criticism” in Present-Day China), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 27 (February 1995), 16–27.Google Scholar

Ben, Xu. Disenchanted Democracy: Chinese Cultural Criticism after 1989. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1999.Google Scholar

Ben, Xu. “Zai tan Zhongguo ‘houxue’ de zhengzhixing he lishi yishi” (Again on the Political Nature and Historical Consciousness of Chinese “Post-Isms”), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 39 (February 1997), 132–37.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. “Bi piping geng zhongyao de shi lijie” (What Is More Important Than Criticizing Is Understanding), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 29 (June 1995), 130–36.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. “Contradictions within Enlightenment Ideas,” tr. Thieret, Adrian. Pp. 197–234 in Tianyu, Cao, Xueping, Zhong, and Kebin, Liao, eds., Culture and Social Transformations in Reform Era China. Leiden: Brill, 2010.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. “The Fate of an Enlightenment: Twenty Years in the Chinese Intellectual Sphere (1978–1998),” tr. Barmé, Geremie and Davies, Gloria. Pp. 183–203 in Gu, Edward and Goldman, Merle, eds., Chinese Intellectuals between State and Market. London: RoutledgeCurzon, 2004.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. “Jijin yu baoshou de mihuo” (The Conundrum of Radicalism and Conservatism), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 11 (June 1992), 137–40. Reprinted under the title “Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang” (The Struggle between Radicalism and Conservatism). Pp. 37–41 in Li Shitao, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. Xu Jilin zixuanji (Self-Selected Works of Xu Jilin). Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 1999.Google Scholar

Jilin, Xu. “Zhongguo zhishi fenzi de ziyou zhuyi chuantong” (The Tradition of Liberalism among Chinese Intellectuals). Pp. 98–109 in Xu, Xu Jilin zixuanji (Self-Selected Works of Xu Jilin). Guilin: Guangxi shifan daxue chubanshe, 1999. Originally published under the title “Xiandai Zhongguo de ziyou zhuyi chuantong” (The Tradition of Liberalism in Contemporary China), Ershiyi shiji (Twenty-First Century), no. 42 (August 1997), 27–35.Google Scholar

Ming, Xu. “Wenhua jijin zhuyi de lishi weidu: Cong Zheng Min, Fan Qinlin de zhenglun shuokai qu” (The Historical Dimension of Cultural Radicalism: Explaining the Debate between Zheng Min and Fan Qinlin). Pp. 207–18 in Shitao, Li, ed., Zhishi fenzi lichang: Jijin yu baoshou zhijian de dongdang. Originally published in Wenxue pinglun (Literary Review), no. 4 (1994), 114–20.Google Scholar

Xu, Youyu. “The Debates between Liberalism and the New Left in China since the 1990s,” Contemporary Chinese Thought 34.3 (Spring 2003), 6–17.Google Scholar

Xu, Youyu. “Intellectual Discourses in Post-Mao China and Today,” Independent Chinese PEN Center. https://protect-eu.mimecast.com/s/p2DiCJ8x8f8KL3oIzT9rK?domain=chinesepen.org.Google Scholar