Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
4 - Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
from Part I - Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 April 2019
By
Book contents
- Quantum Worlds
- Quantum Worlds
- Copyright page
- Contents
- Contributors
- Preface
- Introduction
- Part I Ontology from Different Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics
- 1 Ontology for Relativistic Collapse Theories
- 2 The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation: Measurement, Invariance, and Ontology
- 3 Quantum Mechanics and Perspectivalism
- 4 Quantum Physics Grounded on Bohmian Mechanics
- 5 Ontology of the Wave Function and the Many-Worlds Interpretation
- 6 Generalized Contexts for Quantum Histories
- Part II Realism, Wave Function, and Primitive Ontology
- Part III Individuality, Distinguishability, and Locality
- Part IV Symmetries and Structure in Quantum Mechanics
- Part V The Relationship between the Quantum Ontology and the Classical World
- Index
- References
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- Quantum WorldsPerspectives on the Ontology of Quantum Mechanics, pp. 71 - 92Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2019
References
Allori, V., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (2002). “Seven steps towards the classical world,” Journal of Optics B, 4: 482–488.Google Scholar
Allori, V., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N. (2008). “On the common structure of Bohmian mechanics and the Ghirardi-Rimini-Weber theory,” British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 59: 353–389.Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1964). “On the Einstein-Podolsky-Rosen paradox,” Physics, 1: 195–200. Reprinted in Bell (1987).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1986). “Beables for quantum field theory,” Physics Reports, 137: 49–54. Reprinted in Bell (1987).Google Scholar
Bell, J. S. (1987). Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Berndl, K., Dürr, S., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (1996). “Nonlocality, Lorentz invariance, and Bohmian quantum theory,” Physical Review A, 53: 2062–2073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bohm, D. (1952). “A suggested interpretation of the quantum theory in terms of ‘hidden’ variables: Parts I and II,” Physical Review, 85: 166–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Daumer, M., Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (1996). “Naive realism about operators,” Erkenntnis, 45: 379–397.Google Scholar
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Norsen, T., Struyve, W., and Zanghì, N. (2014). “Can Bohmian mechanics be made relativistic?,” Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 470: 20130699.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., Tumulka, R., and Zanghì, N. (2004). “Bohmian mechanics and quantum field theory,” Physical Review Letters, 93: 090402.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (1992). “Quantum equilibrium and the origin of absolute uncertainty,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 67: 843–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dürr, D., Goldstein, S., and Zanghì, N. (2004). “Quantum equilibrium and the role of operators as observables in quantum theory,” Journal of Statistical Physics, 116: 959–1055.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feynman, R., Morinigo, F., and Wagner, W. (2003). Feynman Lectures On Gravitation. Boca Raton: CRC Press.Google Scholar
Ghirardi, G. C. and Weber, T. (1983). “Quantum mechanics and faster-than-light communication: Methodological considerations,” Nuovo Cimento, 78B: 9–20.Google Scholar
Gleason, A. M. (1957). “Measures on the closed subspaces of a Hilbert space,” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 6: 885–893.Google Scholar
Kochen, S. and Specker, E. P. (1967). “The problem of hidden variables in quantum mechanics,” Journal of Mathematics and Mechanics, 17: 59–87.Google Scholar
Landau, L. D. and Lifshitz, E. M. (1958). Quantum Mechanics: Non-relativistic Theory. J. B. Sykes and J. S. Bell (trans.). Oxford and New York: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Schilpp, P. A. (ed.). (1949). Albert Einstein, Philosopher-Scientist. Evanston, IL: The Library of Living Philosophers.Google Scholar
Schrödinger, E. (1995). The Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Dublin Seminars (1949–1955) and Other Unpublished Essays. Bitbol, M. (ed.). Woodbridge: Ox Bow Press.Google Scholar
von Neumann, J. (1932/1955). Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik. Berlin: Springer Verlag. Beyer, R. T. (trans.), Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Wooters, W. K. and Zurek, W. H. (1982). “A single quantum cannot be cloned,” Nature, 299: 802–803.CrossRefGoogle Scholar