Adler, S. L. 1995. Quaternionic Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Fields. International Series of Monographs on Physics, 88. Oxford University Press.

Adler, S. L. 2016. Does the Peres Experiment Using Photons Test for Hyper-complex (Quaternionic) Quantum Theories? arXiv:quant-ph/1604.04950, 1–5.

Afshar, S. S. 2005. Violation of the Principle of Complementarity, and Its Implications. Pages 229–244 of: The Nature of Light: What Is a Photon? Proceedings of SPIE, no. 5866.

Apollo Program Office. 1969. Apollo 11 (AS-506) Mission. Mission Operation Report, 1–109.

Ashby, Neil. 2002. Relativity and the Global Positioning System. Physics Today, May, 41–47.

Aspect, A., Grangier, P., and Roger, G. 1982. Experimental Realization of Einstein– Podolsky–Rosen–Bohm Gedankenexperiment: A New Violation of Bell's Inequalities. Phys. Rev. Lett., 49, 91–94.Google Scholar

Becker, L. 1998. A New Form of Quantum Interference Restoring Experiment. Phys. Lett. A, 249, 19–24.Google Scholar

Bell, E. T. 1938. The Iterated Exponential Integers. Ann. Math., 39(3), 539–557.Google Scholar

Bell, J. S. 1964. On the Einstein–Podolsky–Rosen paradox. Physics, 1, 195–200.Google Scholar

Bell, J. S. 1988. Speakable and Unspeakable in Quantum Mechanics. Cambridge University Press.

Berkeley, G. 1721. De Motu or Sive de Motus Principio & Natura et de Causa Communicationis Motuum [The Principle and Nature of Motion and the Cause of the Communication of Motions]. Translated by A. A., Luce Pages 253–276 of: Michael R., Ayers, George Berkeley: Philosophical Works. London: Everyman, 1993.

Bernstein, J. 2010. The Stern–Gerlach Experiment. asXiv.org[physics.hist.ph], arXiv:1007.2435, 1–16.

Birrell, N., and Davies, P. 1982. Quantum Fields in Curved Space. Cambridge University Press.

Bjorken, J. D., and Drell, S. D. 1965. Relativistic Quantum Fields. McGraw-Hill.

Bohm, D. 1952. A Suggested Interpretation of the Quantum Theory in Terms of “Hidden Variables,” I and II. Phys. Rev., 85, 166–193.Google Scholar

Bohr, N. 1913. On the Constitution of Atoms and Molecules. Philos. Mag., 26(1), 1–24.Google Scholar

Bombelli, L., Lee, J., Meyer, D., and Sorkin, R. 1987. Space-Time as a Causal Set. Phys. Rev. Lett., 59(5), 521–524.Google Scholar

Bondi, H., and Gold, T. 1948. The Steady-State Theory of the Expanding Universe. MNRAS, 108, 252–270.Google Scholar

Born, M. 1926. Zur Quantenmechanik der Stossvorgänge [The Quantum Mechanics of the Impact Process (Collision Processes)]. Zeitschrift fur Physik, 37, 863–867.Google Scholar

The Born–Einstein Letters. 1971. Trans. Irene Born. Macmillan.

Brandt, H. E. 1999. Positive Operator Valued Measure in Quantum Information Processing. Am. J. Phys., 67(5), 434–439.Google Scholar

Brightwell, G., and Gregory, R. 1991. Structure of Random Discrete Spacetime. Phys. Rev. Lett., 66(3), 260–263.Google Scholar

Burnham, D. C., and Weinberg, D. L. 1970. Observation of Simultaneity in Parametric Production of Optical Photon Pairs. Phys. Rev. Lett., 25, 84–86.Google Scholar

Candlin, D. J. 1956. On Sums over Trajectories for Systems with Fermi Statistics. Nuovo Cimento, 4(2), 231–239.Google Scholar

Casalbuoni, R. 1976a. The ClassicalMechanics for Bose–Fermi Systems. Nuovo Cimento A Series 11, 33(3), 389–431.Google Scholar

Casalbuoni, R. 1976b. On the Quantization of Systems with Anticommuting Variables. Nuovo Cimento A Series 11, 33(1), 115–125.Google Scholar

Cowan, C. L. Jr., Reines, F., Harrison, F. B., et al. 1956. Detection of the Free Neutrino: A Confirmation. Science, 124(3212), 103–104.Google Scholar

Cramer, J. G. 1986. The Transactional Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 58(3), 647–688.Google Scholar

D-Wave Systems. 2016. The D-Wave 2000Q Quantum Computer. D-Wave Systems, 1–12.

de Broglie, L. 1924. Recherches sur la Théorie des Quanta [Researches on the Quantum Theory]. Ph.D. thesis, Faculty of Sciences at Paris University.

Deutsch, D. 1997. The Fabric of Reality. Penguin Press.

Deutsch, D. 1999. Quantum Theory of Probability and Decisions. Proc. R. Soc, 455, 3129–3137.Google Scholar

DeWitt, B. S. 1975. Quantum Field Theory in Curved Spacetime. Physics Reports C, 19(6), 295–357.Google Scholar

Dingle, H. 1967. The Case against Special Relativity. Nature, 216, 119–122.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1938a. Classical Theory of Radiating Electrons. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 167, 148–169.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1938b. A New Basis for Cosmology. Proc. Roy. Soc (London) A, 165(921), 199–208.Google Scholar

Dirac, P. A. M. 1958. The Principles of Quantum Mechanics. Clarendon Press.

Eakins, J. 2004. Classical and Quantum Causality in Quantum Field Theory, or, “The Quantum Universe.” Ph.D. thesis, University of Nottingham.

Eakins, J., and Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2005. A Quantum Computational Approach to the Quantum Universe. Pages 1–51 of: Albert, Reimer (ed.), New Developments in Quantum Cosmology Research. Horizons in World Physics, vol. 247. New York: Nova Science.

Eden, R. J., Landshoff, P. V., Olive, D. I., and Polkinghorne, J. C. 1966. The Analytic S-Matrix. Cambridge University Press.

Ehrenfest, P. 1927. Bemerkung über die angebote Gültigkeit der klassischen Mechanik Innerhalb der Quantenmechanik. Zeitschrift für Physik, 45(7–8), 455–457.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1905a. Über einen die Erzeugung und Verwandlung des Lichtes betreffenden heuristischen Gesichtspunkt [Concerning an Heuristic Point of View Toward the Emission and Transformation of Light]. Annalen der Physik, 17, 132–148. Translation into English American Journal of Physics, 33(5), May 1965.Google Scholar

Einstein, A. 1905b. Zur Electrodynamik Bewgter Körper. Annalen der Physik, 17, 891–921. On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies, translation in The Principle of Relativity, Dover Publications.

Einstein, A., Podolsky, B., and Rosen, N. 1935. Can Quantum-Mechanical Description of Physical Reality Be Considered Complete? Phys. Rev., 47, 777–780.Google Scholar

Elitzur, A. C., and Vaidman, L. 1993. Quantum-Mechanical Interaction-Free Measurements. Found. Phys., 23, 987–997.Google Scholar

Encyclopaedia Britannica. 2000. Time. CD Rom. Britannica.co.uk.

Everett, H. 1957. “Relative State” Formulation of Quantum Mechanics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 29(3), 454–462.Google Scholar

Feynman, R. P., and Hibbs, A. R. 1965. Quantum Mechanics and Path Integrals. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Feynman, R. P., Leighton, R. B., and Sands, M. 1966. The Feynman Lectures on Physics: Quantum Mechanics. Vol. III. Addison-Wesley.

FitzGerald, G. F. 1889. The Ether and the Earth's Atmosphere. Science, 13, 390.Google Scholar

Franson, J. D. 1989. Bell Inequality for Position and Time. Phys. Rev. Lett., 62(19), 2205–2208.Google Scholar

Fuchs, C. A., and Peres, A. 2000. Quantum Theory Needs No Interpretation. Physics Today, March, 70–71.Google Scholar

Gell-Mann, M., and Pais, A. 1955. Behavior of Neutral Particles under Charge Conjugation. Phys. Rev., 97, 1387–1389.Google Scholar

Gerlach, W., and Stern, O. 1922a. Das magnetische Moment des Silberatoms. Zeits. Phys., 9, 353–355.Google Scholar

Gerlach, W., and Stern, O. 1922b. Der experimentelle Nachweis der Richtungsquantelung im Magnetfeld. Zeits. Phys., 9, 349–352.Google Scholar

Glauber, R. J. 1963a. Coherent and Incoherent States of the Radiation Field. Phys. Rev., 131(6), 2766–2788.Google Scholar

Glauber, R. J. 1963b. Photon Correlations. Phys. Rev. Lett., 10(3), 84–86.Google Scholar

Glauber, R. J. 1963c. The Quantum Theory of Optical Coherence. Physical Review, 130(6), 2529–2539.Google Scholar

Gödel, K. 1949. An Example of a New Type of Cosmological Solution of Einstein's Field Equations of Gravity. Rev. Mod. Phys., 21(3), 447–450.Google Scholar

Goldstein, H. 1964. Classical Mechanics. Addison-Wesley.

Greenberger, D., and YaSin, A. 1989. “Haunted” Measurements in Quantum Theory. Found. Phys., 19(6), 679–704.Google Scholar

Griffiths, R. B. 1984. Consistent Histories and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. J. Stat. Phys., 36(12), 219–272.Google Scholar

Halligan, Peter, and Oakley, David. 2000. Greatest Myth of All. New Scientist, 18 November, 34–39.Google Scholar

Hameroff, S. 1999. Quantum Computation in Brain Microtubules? The Penrose– Hameroff “Orch-OR” Model of Consciousness. www.u.arizona.edu/~hameroff/ royal.html, 1–30.

Hamming, R. W. 1950. Error Detecting and Error Correcting Codes. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 29(2), 147–160.Google Scholar

Hardy, L. 1992. Quantum Mechanics, Local Realistic Theories and Lorentz-Invariant Realistic Theories. Phys. Rev. Lett., 68(20), 2981–2984.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. 1925. Über Quantentheoretische Umdeutung Kinematischer und Mechanischer Beziehungen [Quantum-Theoretical Reinterpretation of Kinematic and Mechanical Relations]. Zeits. Physik A Hadrons and Nuclei, 33(1), 879 –893.Google Scholar

Heisenberg, W. 1930. The Physical Principles of the Quantum Theory. Dover Edition, 1949 ed. University of Chicago Press.

Heisenberg, W. 1952. Questions of Principle in Modern Physics. Pages 41–52 of: Philosophic Problems in Nuclear Science. London: Faber and Faber.

Horne, M. A., Shimony, A., and Zeilinger, A. 1989. Two-Particle Interferometry. Phys. Rev. Lett., 62(19), 2209–2212.Google Scholar

Howson, A. G. 1972. A Handbook of Terms Used in Algebra and Analysis. Cambridge University Press.

Hoyle, F. 1948. A New Model for the Expanding Universe. MNRAS, 108, 372–382.Google Scholar

Itano, W. M., Heinzen, D. J., Bollinger, J. J., and Wineland, D. J. 1990. Quantum Zeno Effect. Phys. Rev. A, 41(5), 2295–2300.Google Scholar

Jacques, V., Wu, E., Grosshans, F., Treussart, F., Grangier, P., Aspect, A., and Roch, J.-F. 2007. Experimental Realization of Wheeler's Delayed-Choice Gedankenexperiment. Science, 315(5814), 966–968. www.arxiv.org/abs/quant-ph/0610241.Google Scholar

Jacques, V., Lai, N. D., Zheng, D., Chauvat, F., Treussart, F., Grangier, P., and Roch, J.-F. 2008. Illustration of Quantum Complementarity Using Single Photons Interfering on a Grating. New. J. Phys., 10, 123009.Google Scholar

Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2004. Quantum Register Physics. arXiv:quant-ph/0409094.

Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2008a. Quantized Detector Networks: A Review of Recent Developments. Int. J. Mod. Phys. B, 22(3), 123–188.Google Scholar

Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2008b. Quantized Detector Networks, Particle Decays and the Quantum Zeno Effect. J. Phys. A: Math. Theor., 41(9), 095301.Google Scholar

Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2010. Towards a Dynamical Theory of Observation. Proc. Roy. Soc. A, 466(2124), 3715–3739.Google Scholar

Jaroszkiewicz, G. 2016. Principles of Empiricism and the Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics. Pages 139–173 of: M., Dugic, R., Kastner, and G., Jaroszkiewicz (eds.), Quantum Structural Studies. World Scientific.

Jaynes, E. T. 2003. Probability Theory: The Logic of Science. Cambridge University Press.

Joos, E. 2012. Decoherence. www.decoherence.de.

Jordan, P., and Wigner, E. P. 1928. Über Das Paulische Äquivalenzverbot. Zeitschrift für Physik, 47, 631–651.Google Scholar

Kahneman, D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. Allen Lane.

Karyotakis, Y., and de Monchenault, G. H. 2002. A Violation of CP Symmetry in B Meson Decays. Europhysics News, May/June, 89–93.Google Scholar

Kastner, R. E. 2005. Why the Afshar Experiment Does Not Refute Complementarity. Stud. Hist. Philos. M. P., 36(4), 649–658.Google Scholar

Kastner, R. E. 2016. The Illusory Appeal of Decoherence in the Everettian Picture: Affirming the Consequent. arXiv:1603.04845 [quant-ph], 1–7.

Kim, Y., Yu, R., Kulik, S., Shih, Y., and Scully, M. 2000. A Delayed Choice Quantum Eraser. Phys. Rev. Lett., 84, 1–5. arXiv:quant-ph/9903047.Google Scholar

Kim, Yoon-Ho. 2003. Two-Photon Interference Without Bunching Two Photons. Phys. Lett. A, 315, 352–355.Google Scholar

Klauder, J. R., and Sudarshan, E. C. G. 1968. Fundamentals of Quantum Optics. W.A. Benjamin.

Klyshko, D. N., Penin, A. N., and Polkovnikov, B. F. 1970. Parametric Luminescence and Light Scattering by Polaritons. JETP Lett., 11(1), 5–8.Google Scholar

Kochen, S., and Specker, E. 1967. The Problem of Hidden Variables in Quantum Mechanics. J. Math. Mechanics, 17, 59–87.Google Scholar

Koke, S., Grebing, C., Frei, H., Anderson, A., Assion, A., and Steinmeyer, G. 2010. Direct Frequency Comb Synthesis with Arbitrary Offset and Shot-Noise-Limited Phase Noise. Nature Photonics, 4, 463–465.Google Scholar

Kracklauer, A. F. 2002. Time Contortions in Modern Physics. arXiv:quant-ph/0206164, 1–7. Draft for: Proceedings, The Nature of Time: Geometry, Physics and Perception; May 21–24, 2002, Tatranska Lomnica, Slovak Republic.

Kraus, K. 1974. Operations and Effects in the Hilbert Space Formulation of Quantum Theory. Berlin: Springer, pages 206–229.

Kraus, K. 1983. States, Effects, and Operations: Fundamental Notions of Quantum Theory. Lecture Notes in Physics (190). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.

Kwiat, P. G., Steinberg, A. M., and Chiao, R. Y. 1993. High-Visibility Interference in a Bell-Inequality Experiment for Energy and Time. Physical Review A, 47(4), R2472–R2475.Google Scholar

Kwiat, P., Weinfurter, H., Herzog, T., Zeilinger, A., and Kasevich, M. 1994. Experimental Realization of “Interaction-Free” Measurements. In: K. V., Laurikainen, C., Montonen, and Sunnarborg (eds.), Symposium on the Foundations of Modern Physics 1994. Editions Frontières.

Larmor, J. J. 1897. On a Dynamical Theory of the Electric and Luminiferous Medium, Part 3, Relations with Material Media. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc., 190, 205–300.Google Scholar

Laven, P. A., Taplin, D. W., and Bell, C. P. 1970. Television Reception over Sea Paths: The Effect of the Tide. BBC Research Department Report, 1–25.Google Scholar

Leech, J. W. 1965. Classical Mechanics. Methuen and Co.

Leggett, A. J., and Garg, A. 1985. Quantum Mechanics versus Macroscopic Realism: Is the Flux There When Nobody Looks? Phys. Rev. Lett., 54(9), 857–860.Google Scholar

Lehmann, H., Symanzik, K., and Zimmermann, W. 1955. Zur Formulierung Quantisierter Feldtheorien. Il Nuovo Cimento, 1(1), 205–225.Google Scholar

Lewis, G. N. 1926. The Conservation of Photons. Nature, 118, 874–875.Google Scholar

Liang, Y., and Czarnecki, A. 2011. Photon–Photon Scattering: A Tutorial. arXiv:1111.6126v2 [hep-ph], 1–9.Google Scholar

Lichtenberg, D. B. 1970. Unitary Symmetry and Elementary Particles. Academic Press.

Lorentz, H. A. 1899. Simplified Theory of Electrical and Optical Phenomena in Moving Systems. Proc. Acad. Science Amsterdam, I, 427–443.Google Scholar

Ludwig, G. 1983a. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics I. New York: Springer.

Ludwig, G. 1983b. Foundations of Quantum Mechanics II. New York: Springer.

Magueijo, J. 2003. New Varying Speed of Light Theories. Rept. Prog. Phys., 66(11), 2025–2068.Google Scholar

Mardari, G. N. 2005. What Is a Quantum Really Like? In: G., Adenier, A. Y., Khrennikov, and T. M., Nieuwenhuizen (eds.), Quantum Theory: Reconsideration of Foundations–3. AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 81.

Markopoulou, F. 2000. Quantum Causal Histories. Class. Quant. Grav., 17, 2059–2072.Google Scholar

Mars Climate Orbiter Mishap Investigation Board. 1999. Phase I Report. 1–44.

Martin, J. L. 1959a. The Feynman Principle for a Fermi System. Proc. Roy. Soc., A251, 543–549.Google Scholar

Martin, J. L. 1959b. Generalized Classical Dynamics and the “Classical Analogue” of a Fermi Oscillator. Proc. Roy. Soc., A251, 536–542.Google Scholar

Merli, P. G., Missiroli, G. F., and Pozzi, G. 1976. On the Statistical Aspect of Electron Interference Phenomena. Am. J. Phys., 44(3), 306–307.Google Scholar

Meschini, D. 2007. Planck-Scale Physics: Facts and Beliefs. Found. Science, 12(4), 277–294.Google Scholar

Minkowski, H. 1908. Space and Time. A translation of an Address delivered at the 80th Assembly of German Natural Scientists and Physicians, at Cologne, 21 September, 75–91. Reprinted in H. A., Lorentz, A., Einstein, H., Minkowski, and H., Weyl, The Principle of Relativity. Dover.

Misra, B., and Sudarshan, E. C. G. 1977. The Zeno's Paradox in Quantum Theory. J. Math. Phys., 18(4), 756–763.Google Scholar

Newton, I. 1687. The Principia (Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica). University of California Press, 1999. New translation by I. B., Cohen and Anne, Whitman. University of California Press, 1999.

Newton, I. 1704. Opticks. 1952 ed. Dover Publications.

Newton, I. 2006. Original letter from Isaac Newton to Richard Bentley. The Newton Project (online).

Nielsen, M. A., and Chuang, I. L. 2000. Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press.

Paris, M. G. A. 2012. The Modern Tools of Quantum Mechanics (A Tutorial on Quantum States, Measurement, and Operations). Eur. Phys. J. Special Topics, 203, 61–86.Google Scholar

Paul, H. 2004. Introduction to Quantum Optics. Cambridge University Press. Translated from the German Photonen. Eine Einführung in die Quantenoptik, 2. Auflage (1999).

Penrose, R. 1971. Angular Momentum: An Approach to Combinatorial Spacetime. In: T., Bastin (ed.), Quantum Theory and Beyond. Cambridge University Press.

Peres, A. 1995. Quantum Theory: Concepts and Methods. Kluwer Academic.

Petkov, V. 2012. Space and Time: Minkowski's Papers on Relativity. Minkowski Institute Press, pages 1–37.

Planck, M. 1900a. On the Theory of the Energy Distribution Law of the Normal Spectrum. Verhandl. Dtsch. Phys. Ges., 2(17), 237–245.Google Scholar

Planck, M. 1900b. Ueber eine Verbesserung der Wien'schen Spectralgleichung [On an Improvement of Wein's Equation for the Spectrum]. Verhandl. Dtsch. Phys. Ges., 2(13), 202–204.Google Scholar

Poincaré, H. 1890. Sur Le Problème Des Trois Corps et Les Équations de la Dynamique. Acta. Math., 13, 1–270.Google Scholar

Price, H. 1997. Time's Arrow. Oxford University Press.

Procopio, L. M., et al. 2016. Experimental Test of Hyper-Complex Quantum Theories. arXiv:1602.01624v2 [quant-ph].

Regge, T. 1961. General Relativity Without Coordinates. Il Nuovo Cimento, 19(3), 558–571.Google Scholar

Renniger, M. 1953. Zum Wellen-Korpuskel-Dualismus. Zeits. für Physik, 136, 251–261.Google Scholar

Requardt, M. 1999. Space-Time as an Orderparameter Manifold in Random Networks and the Emergence of Physical Points. gr-qc/99023031, 1–40.

Ridout, D. P., and Sorkin, R. D. 2000. A Classical Sequential Growth Dynamics for Causal Sets. Phys. Rev., D61, 024002. arXiv: gr-qc/9904062.Google Scholar

Rosa, R. 2012. The Merli–Missiroli–Pozzi Two-Slit Electron-Interference Experiment. Phys. Perspect., 14, 178–195.Google Scholar

Scarani, V., Tittel, W., Zbinden, H., and Gisin, N. 2000. The Speed of Quantum Information and the Preferred Frame: Analysis of Experimental Data. Phys. Lett., A276, 1–7.Google Scholar

Schrödinger,, E. 1926. Quantisierung als Eigenwertproblem (Erste Mitteilung). Ann. Phys., 384(4), 361–376.Google Scholar

Schrödinger, E. 1935. The Present Situation in Quantum Mechanics. Naturwissenschaften, 23(48), 807–812. Original title: Die gegenw artige Situation in der Quantenmechanik, reprinted in Quantum Theory and Measurement, edited by J. A., Wheeler and W. H., Zurek, Princeton University Press, 1983.

Schutz, B. 1980. Geometrical Methods of Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press.

Schwinger, J. 1958. Spin, Statistics and the TCP theorem. Proc. N. A. S., 44, 223–228.Google Scholar

Schwinger, J. 1969. Particles and Sources. Gordon and Breach.

Schwinger, J. 1998a. Particles, Sources, and Fields. Advanced Books Classics. Reading, MA: Perseus.

Schwinger, J. 1998b. Particles, Sources, and Fields. Advanced Books Classics, vol. 2. Reading, MA: Perseus.

Schwinger, J. 1998c. Particles, Sources, and Fields. Advanced Books Classics, vol. III. Reading, MA: Perseus.

Sen, R. N. 2010. Causality, Measurement Theory and the Differentiable Structure of Space-Time. Cambridge Monographs on Mathematical Physics. Cambridge University Press.

Shannon, C. E. 1948. A Mathematical Theory of Communication. Bell Syst. Tech. J., 27(July, October), 379–423, 623–656.Google Scholar

Sillitto, R. M., and Wykes, C. 1972. An Interference Experiment with Light Beams Modulated in Anti-Phase by an Electro-Optic Shutter. Phys. Lett. A, 39(4), 333–334.Google Scholar

Sinha, U., et al. 2010. Ruling Out Multi-Order Interference in Quantum Mechanics. Science, 329, 418–421.Google Scholar

Snyder, H. S. 1947a. The Electromagnetic Field in Quantized Space-Time. Phys. Rev., 72(1), 68–71.Google Scholar

Snyder, H. S. 1947b. Quantized Space-Time. Phys. Rev., 71(1), 38–41.Google Scholar

Sorkin, R. D. 1994. Quantum Mechanics as Quantum Measure Theory. Mod. Phys. Lett. A, 9, 3119–3128.Google Scholar

Streater, R. F., and Wightman, A. S. 1964. PCT, Spin and Statistics, and All That. W.A. Benjamin.

Stuckey, M. 1999. Pregeometry and the Trans-Temporal Object. In: R., Buccheri, V. Di, Gesu, and M., Saniga (eds.), Studies of the Structure of Time: from Physics to Psycho(Patho)Logy, 121–128. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

Taylor, G. I. 1909. Interference Fringes with Feeble Light. Proc. Camb. Philos. Soc., 15, 114–115.Google Scholar

Tropper, A. M. 1969. Linear Algebra. Thomas Nelson and Sons.

Unruh, W. G. 1976. Notes on Black-Hole Evaporation. Phys. Rev. D, 14(4), 870–892.Google Scholar

von Neumann, J. 1955. The Mathematical Foundations of Quantum Mechanics. Princeton University Press. Originally published as Mathematische Grundlagen der Quantenmechanik, Berlin: Springer, 1932.

Walborn, S. P., Cunha, M. O. Terra, Pádua, S., and Monken, C. H. 2002. Double–Slit Quantum Eraser. Phys. Rev., 65, 033818 1–6.Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. 1979. From the Big Bang to the Big Crunch. Cosmic Search Magazine, 1(4). Interview with J. A. Wheeler.Google Scholar

Wheeler, J. A. 1980. Pregeometry: Motivations and Prospects. Pages 1–11 of: A. R., Marlow (ed.), Quantum Theory and Gravitation. New York: Academic Press.

Wheeler, J. A. 1983. Quantum Theory and Measurement. Princeton Series in Physics. Princeton University Press, pages 182–213.Google Scholar

Woit, P. 2006. Not Even Wrong: The Failure of String Theory and the Search for Unity in Physical Law. Basic Books.

Wu, C. S., Ambler, E., Hayward, R. W., Hoppes, D. D., and Hudson, R. P. 1957. Experimental Test of Parity Conservation in Beta Decay. Phys. Rev., 105(4), 1413–1415.Google Scholar

Zurek, W. 2002. Decoherence and the Transition from Quantum to Classical–Revisited. Los Alamos Science, (27), 2–24.