Adcock, Robert, and Collier, David. 2001. Measurement validity: a shared standard for qualitative and quantitative research. American Political Science Review, 95(3), 529–546.Google Scholar

Arel-Bundock, Vincent. 2019. The double bind of Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, DOI: 10.1177/0049124119882460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Bara, Corinne. 2014. Incentives and opportunities: a complexity-oriented explanation of violent ethnic conflict. Journal of Peace Research, 51(6), 696–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Barrenechea, Rodrigo, and Castillo, Isabel. 2019. The many roads to Rome: family resemblance concepts in the social sciences. Quality & Quantity, 53(1), 107–130.Google Scholar

Basurto, Xavier, and Speer, Johanna. 2012. Structuring the calibration of qualitative data as sets for Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA). Field Methods, 24(2), 155–174.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael. 2008. Uncovering deterministic causal structures: a Boolean approach. Synthese, 170(1), 71–96.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael. 2009. Inferring causal complexity. Sociological Methods & Research, 38(1), 71–101.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael. 2013. Detecting causal chains in small-N data. Field Methods, 25(1), 3–24.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael. 2015. Parsimony and causality. Quality & Quantity, 49(2), 839–856.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2015. Identifying complex causal dependencies in configurational data with coincidence analysis. The R Journal, 7(1), 176–184.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2017. Model ambiguities in configurational comparative research. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(4), 954–987.Google Scholar

Baumgartner, Michael, and Thiem, Alrik. 2020. Often trusted but never (properly) tested: evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 279–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Beach, Derek, and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2018. Integrating cross-case analyses and process tracing in set-theoretic research: strategies and parameters of debate. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 3–36.Google Scholar

Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, and De Meur, Gisele. 2009. Comparative research design: case and variable selection. Pages 19–32 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.Google Scholar

Berg-Schlosser, Dirk, De Meur, Gisele, Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. 2008. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as an approach. Pages 1–18 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.Google Scholar

Brady, Henry E., and Collier, David. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Braumoeller, Bear F. 2017. Aggregation bias and the analysis of necessary and sufficient conditions in fsQCA. Sociological Methods & Research, 46(2), 242–251.Google Scholar

Caren, Neal, and Panofsky, Aaron. 2005. TQCA: a technique for adding temporality to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 34(2), 147–172.Google Scholar

Cooper, Barry, and Glaesser, Judith. 2016a. Exploring the robustness of set theoretic findings from a large n fsQCA: an illustration from the sociology of education. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 19(4), 445–459.Google Scholar

Cooper, Barry, and Glaesser, Judith. 2016b. Analysing necessity and sufficiency with Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how do results vary as case weights change? Quality and Quantity, 50(1), 327–346.Google Scholar

Cronqvist, Lasse. 2019. Tosmana [Version 1.61].Google Scholar

Cronqvist, Lasse, and Berg-Schlosser, Dirk. 2009. Multi-value QCA (mvQCA). Pages 69–86 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), Configurational Comparative Methods. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks/London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

de Block, Debora, and Vis, Barbara. 2019. Addressing the challenges related to transforming qualitative into quantitative data in qualitative comparative analysis. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 13(4), 503–535.Google Scholar

Dusa, Adrian. 2018. QCA with R. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Ege, Jörn, Thomann, Eva, and Paustyan, Ekatarina. 2019. Approaches to Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and standards of good practice: a systematic review. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference, Wroclaw, November 4–7, 2019.Google Scholar

Emmenegger, Patrick. 2012. How good are your counterfactuals? Assessing quantitative macro-comparative welfare state research. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(4), 365–380.Google Scholar

Emmenegger, Patrick, Kvist, Jon, and Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2013. Making the most of Configurational Comparative Analysis: an assessment of QCA applications in comparative welfare-state research. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 185–190.Google Scholar

Emmenegger, Patrick, Schraff, Dominik, and Walter, André. 2014. QCA, the truth table analysis and large-N survey data: the benefits of calibration and the importance of robustness tests. COMPASSS Working Paper 2014-79.Google Scholar

Fischer, Manuel. 2011. Social network analysis and Qualitative Comparative Analysis: their mutual benefit for the explanation of policy network structures. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(2), 27–51.Google Scholar

Fischer, Manuel, and Maggetti, Martino. 2017. Qualitative Comparative Analysis and the study of policy processes. Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis: Research and Practice, 19(4), 345–361.Google Scholar

Fiss, Peer C. 2011. Building better causal theories: a fuzzy set approach to typologies in organization research. Academy of Management Journal, 54(2), 393–420.Google Scholar

Fiss, Peer, Sharapov, Dmitry, and Cronqvist, Lasse. 2013. Opposites attract? Opportunities and challenges for integrating large-N QCA and econometric analysis. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 191–197.Google Scholar

Freyburg, Tina, and Garbe, Lisa. 2018. Blocking the bottleneck: internet shutdowns and ownership at election times in sub-Saharan Africa. International Journal of Communication, 12 (2018), 3896–3916.Google Scholar

García-Castro, Roberto, and Arino, Miguel A. 2016. A general approach to panel data set-theoretic research. Journal of Advances in Management Sciences & Information Systems, 2, 63–76.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2008. Case selection for case-study analysis: qualitative and quantitative techniques. Pages 645–684 of: Box-Steffensmeier, J., Brady, Henry. E., and Collier, David (eds.), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Gerring, John. 2011. Social Science Methodology: A Unified Framework. Strategies for Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2006. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Goertz, Gary. 2012. Social Science Concepts: A User’s Guide. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2005. Two-level theories and fuzzy-set analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 33(4), 497–538.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2009. Scope in case study research. Pages 307–318 of: Byrne, David, and Ragin, Charles C. (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Case-Based Methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Mahoney, James. 2012. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Goertz, Gary, and Starr, Harvey. 2003. Necessary Conditions: Theory, Methodology, and Applications. Lanham/Boulder: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar

Greckhamer, Thomas, Furnari, Santi, Fiss, Peer C., and Aguilera, Ruth V. 2018. Studying configurations with qualitative comparative analysis: best practices in strategy and organization research. Strategic Organization, 16(4), 482–495.Google Scholar

Greckhamer, Thomas, Misangyi, Vilmos F., and Fiss, Peer C. 2013. The two QCAs: from a small-N to a large-N set theoretic approach. Pages 49–75 of: Fiss, P. C., Cambre, B., and Marx, A. (eds.), Configurational Theory and Methods in Organizational Research. Somerville: Emerald Publishing Ltd.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Haesebrouck, Tim. 2016. The added value of multi-value Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung [Forum Qualitative Social Research], 17(1).Google Scholar

Hug, Simon. 2013. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: how inductive use and measurement error lead to problematic inference. Political Analysis, 21(2), 252–265.Google Scholar

Jopke, Nikolaus, and Gerrits, Lasse. 2019. Constructing cases and conditions in QCA-lessons from grounded theory. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 22(6), 599–610.Google Scholar

Kahwati, Leila C., and Kane, Heather L. 2018. Qualitative Comparative Analysis in Mixed Methods Research and Evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar

King, Gary, Keohane, Robert O., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. Designing Social Inquiry. Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Koivu, Kendra, Schneider, Carsten Q., and Vis, Barbara. 2020. Set-analytic approaches, especially Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) Final Report of QTD Working Group III.4, in Jacobs, Alan M. et al. (eds), Transparency in qualitative research: an overview of key findings and implications of the deliberations. Perspectives on Politics 19(1): 171–208.Google Scholar

Krogslund, Chris, Choi, Donghyun Danny, and Poertner, Mathias. 2014. Fuzzy sets on shaky ground: parametric and specification sensitivity in fsQCA. Political Analysis, 23(1), 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul. 1937. Some remarks on typological procedures in social research. Zeitschrift für Sozialforschung, 6(1), 119–139.Google Scholar

Lazarsfeld, Paul Felix, and Barton, Allen H. 1957. Qualitative Measurement in the Social Siences: Classification, Typologies, and Indices. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar

Lebow, Richard Ned. 2010. Forbidden Fruit: Counterfactuals and International Relations. Princeton/Oxford: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar

Legewie, Nicolas. 2017. Anchored calibration: from qualitative data to fuzzy sets. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 18(3), 24.Google Scholar

Levi-Faur, David. 2006. A question of size? A heuristics for stepwise comparative research design. Pages 43–66 of: Rihoux, Benoit, and Grimm, Heike (eds.), Innovative Comparative Methods for Policy Analysis. New York: Springer.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James. 2010. After KKV: the new methodology of qualitative research. World Politics, 62(1), 120–147.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2004. The possibility principle and case selection: choosing negative cases in comparative analysis. American Political Science Review, 98(4), 653–669.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Goertz, Gary. 2006. A tale of two cultures: contrasting quantitative and qualitative research. Political Analysis, 14(3), 227–249.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, Kimball, Erin, and Koivu, Kendra L. 2009. The logic of historical explanation in the social sciences. Comparative Political Studies, 42(1), 114–146.Google Scholar

Mahoney, James, and Vanderpoel, Rachel Sweet. 2015. Set diagrams and qualitative research. Comparative Political Studies, 48(1), 65–100.Google Scholar

Marx, Axel, and Dusa, Adrian. 2011. Crisp-set Qualitative Comparative Analysis (csQCA), contradictions and consistency benchmarks for model specification. Methodological Innovations Online, 6(2), 103–148.Google Scholar

Mello, Patrick A. 2021. Qualitative Comparative Analysis: Research Design and Application. Washington: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar

Meuer, Johannes, and Rupietta, Christian. 2017. Integrating QCA and HLM for multi-level research on organizational configurations. Organizational Research Methods, 20(2), 324–342.Google Scholar

Mikkelsen, Kim Sass. 2017. Negative case selection: justifications and consequences for set-theoretic MMR. Sociological Methods and Research, 46(4), 739–771.Google Scholar

Mill, John Stuart. 1872. A System of Logic. 8 ed., vol. 2. London: Longmans, Green, Reader.Google Scholar

Misangyi, V. F., Greckhamer, T., Furnari, S., Fiss, P. C., Crilly, D., and Aguilera, R. 2017. Embracing causal complexity: the emergence of a neo-configurational perspective. Journal of Management, 43(1), 255–282.Google Scholar

Møller, Jørgen, and Skaaning, Svend Erik. 2019. Set-theoretic methods in democratization research: an evaluation of their uses and contributions. Democratization, 26(1), 78–96.Google Scholar

Oana, Ioana-Elena, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. SetMethods: an add-on R package for advanced QCA. The R Journal, 10(1): 507–533.Google Scholar

Oana, Ioana Elena, and Schneider, Carsten Q. n.d. A Robustness Test Protocol for Applied QCA: Theory and R Software Application. Under review.Google Scholar

Paykani, Toktam, Rafiey, Hassan, and Sajjadi, Homeira. 2018. A fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis of 131 countries: which configuration of the structural conditions can explain health better? International Journal for Equity in Health, 17(1), 10.Google Scholar

Przeworski, Adam, and Teune, Henry. 1970. The Logic of Comparative Social Inquiry. 8 ed., vol. 2. New York: Wiley-Interscience.Google Scholar

Radaelli, Claudio M., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2019. What did I leave out? Omitted variables in regression and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. European Political Science, 18(2), 275–290.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 1987. The Comparative Method: Moving beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 1994. Constructing Social Research. The Unity and Diversity of Method. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 2000. Fuzzy-Set Social Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 2008a. Measurement versus calibration: A set-theoretic approach. Pages 174–198 of Steffensmeier, J., Brady, Henry. E., and Collier, David (eds), Oxford Handbook of Political Methodology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 2008b. Redesigning Social Inquiry: Fuzzy Sets and Beyond. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C. 2008c. Qualitative Comparative Analysis using fuzzy sets (fsQCA). Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Pages 87–122 pf Rihoux, B., and Ragin, C. C. (eds), Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques, vol. 51. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, Inc.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C., and Becker, Howard Saul. 1992. What Is a Case?: Exploring the Foundations of Social Inquiry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C., and Davey, Sean. 2016. Fuzzy-Set/Qualitative Comparative Analysis 3.0. Irvine: Department of Sociology, University of California. Available at: www.socsci.uci.edu/$\oldsim$cragin/fsQCA/software.shtml.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C., and Fiss, Peer C. 2016. Intersectional Inequality. Race, Class, Test Scores, and Poverty. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C., and Strand, Sarah. 2008. Using Qualitative Comparative Analysis to study causal order. Comment on Caren and Panofsky (2005). Sociological Methods and Research, 36(4), 431–441.Google Scholar

Ragin, Charles C., Shulman, David, Weinberg, Adam, and Gran, Brian. 2003. Complexity, generality, and Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Field Methods, 15(4), 323–340.Google Scholar

Rihoux, Benoit, Alamos, Priscilla, Bol, Damien, Marx, Axel, and Rezsohazy, Ilona. 2013. From niche to mainstream method? A comprehensive mapping of QCA applications in journal articles from 1984 to 2011. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 175–184.Google Scholar

Rihoux, Benoît, and Ragin, Charles C. 2009. Configurational Comparative Methods: Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and Related Techniques. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Rohlfing, Ingo. 2015. Mind the gap: a review of simulation designs for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Research & Politics, 2(4), 1–4.Google Scholar

Rohlfing, Ingo. 2016. Why simulations are appropriate for evaluating Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Quality & Quantity, 50(5), 2073–208.Google Scholar

Rohlfing, Ingo, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2013. Improving research on necessary conditions: formalized case selection for process tracing after QCA. Political Research Quarterly, 66(1), 220–235.Google Scholar

Rohlfing, Ingo, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. A unifying framework for causal analysis in set-theoretic multimethod research. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(1), 37–63.Google Scholar

Roig-Tierno, Norat, Gonzalez-Cruz, Tomas F., and Llopis-Martinez, Jordi. 2017. An overview of Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a bibliometric analysis. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 2(1), 15–23.Google Scholar

RStudio Team. 2019. RStudio: Integrated Development Environment for R. Boston: RStudio, Inc.Google Scholar

Rubinson, Claude. 2019. Presenting Qualitative Comparative Analysis: notation, tabular layout, and visualization. Methodological Innovations, 12(2), 1–22.Google Scholar

Rubinson, Claude, Gerrits, Lasse, Rutten, Roel, and Greckhamer, Thomas. 2019. Avoiding common errors in QCA: a short guide for new practitioners. COMPASSS Working Paper, available at https://compasss.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/Common_Errors_in_QCA.pdf .Google Scholar

Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. Concept misformation in comparative politics. American Political Science Review, 64(4), 1033–1053.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. 2016. Real differences and overlooked similarities. Set-methods in comparative perspective. Comparative Political Studies, 49(6), 781–792.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. 2018. Realists and idealists in QCA. Political Analysis, 26(2), 246–254.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. 2019. Two-step QCA revisited: the necessity of context conditions. Quality & Quantity, 53(3), 1109–1126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q. 2022. Set-Theoretic Multi-Method Research: A Guide to Combining QCA and Case Studies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Under contract.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Maerz, Seraphine. 2017. Legitimation, cooptation, and repression and the survival of electoral autocracies. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft, 11(2), 213–235.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2013. Combining QCA and process tracing in set-theoretic multi-method research. Sociological Methods and Research, 42(4), 559–597.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2016. Case studies nested in fuzzy-set QCA on sufficiency: formalizing case selection and causal inference. Sociological Methods & Research, 45(3), 526–568.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Rohlfing, Ingo. 2019. Set-theoretic multimethod research: the role of test corridors and conjunctions for case selection. Swiss Political Science Review, 25(3), 253–275.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2006. Reducing complexity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): remote and proximate factors and the consolidation of democracy. European Journal of Political Research, 45(5), 751–786.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2010. Standards of good practice in Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) and fuzzy-sets. Comparative Sociology, 9(3), 397–418.Google Scholar

Schneider, Carsten Q., and Wagemann, Claudius. 2012. Set-Theoretic Methods for the Social Sciences: A Guide to Qualitative Comparative Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Skaaning, Svend-Erik. 2011. Assessing the robustness of crisp-set and fuzzy-set QCA results. Sociological Methods & Research, 40(2), 391–408.Google Scholar

Thiem, Alrik. 2014a. Membership function sensitivity of descriptive statistics in fuzzyset relations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 17(6), 625–642.Google Scholar

Thiem, Alrik. 2014b. Mill’s methods, induction, and case sensitivity in Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a comment on Hug (2013). Qualitative & Multi-Method Research Newsletter, 12(2), 19–24.Google Scholar

Thiem, Alrik. 2014c. Unifying configurational comparative methods: generalized-set qualitative comparative analysis. Sociological Methods & Research, 43(2), 313–337.Google Scholar

Thiem, Alrik, and Dusa, Adrian. 2013. QCA: a package for Qualitative Comparative Analysis. R Journal, 5(1), 87–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thiem, Alrik, Spöhel, Reto, and Duşa, Adrian. 2016. Enhancing sensitivity diagnostics for Qualitative Comparative Analysis: a combinatorial approach. Political Analysis, 24(1), 104–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Thomann, Eva. 2015. Customizing Europe: transposition as bottom-up implementation. Journal of European Public Policy, 22(10), 1368–1387.Google Scholar

Thomann, Eva. 2019. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) as a tool for street-level bureaucracy research. Pages 370–391 of: Research Handbook on Street-Level Bureaucracy: The Ground Floor of Government in Context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar

Thomann, Eva, and Maggetti, Martino. 2020. Designing research with Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA): Approaches, Challenges, and Tools. Sociological Methods & Research, 49(2), 356–386.Google Scholar

Thomann, Eva, van Engen, Nadine, and Tummers, Lars. 2018. The necessity of discretion: a behavioral evaluation of bottom-up implementation theory. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 28(4), 583–601.Google Scholar

Toth, Zsofia, Henneberg, Stephan C., and Naude, Peter. 2017. Addressing the ‘qualitative’ in fuzzy set qualitative Comparative analysis: the generic membership evaluation template. Industrial Marketing Management, 63, 192–204.Google Scholar

Verweij, Stefan, and Trell, E.-M. 2019. Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) in spatial planning research and related disciplines: a systematic literature review of applications. Journal of Planning Literature, 34(3), 300–317.Google Scholar

Wagemann, Claudius, and Schneider, Carsten Q. 2015. Transparency standards in qualitative comparative analysis. Qualitative & Multi-Method Research, 13(1), 38–42.Google Scholar

Wagemann, Claudius, Buche, Jonas, and Siewert, Markus B. 2016. QCA and business research: work in progress or a consolidated agenda? Journal of Business Research, 69(7), 2531–2540.Google Scholar