Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-4rdrl Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-06-13T23:45:11.353Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Diverse Public Reason

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 October 2022

Kevin Vallier
Affiliation:
Bowling Green State University, Ohio
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Public Reason and Diversity
Reinterpretations of Liberalism
, pp. 177 - 265
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

References

Arthur, WB (1994) Increasing Returns and Path Dependence in the Economy. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Axelrod, R and Cohen, MD (2000) Harnessing Complexity. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Berlin, I (1990) The apotheosis of the romantic will. In: Henry, Hardy (ed.) The Crooked Timber of Humanity: Chapters in the History of Ideas. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 207–37.Google Scholar
Berlin, I (1999) The Roots of Romanticism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C (2006) The Grammar of Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bicchieri, C (2016) Norms in the Wild. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Brandt, RB (1979) A Theory of the Good and the Right. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, GA (2008) Rescuing Justice and Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F (2010) Naturalizing Epistemology. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
de Waal, F (2013) The Bonobo and the Atheist. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Ewin, EW (1991) Virtues and Rights: The Moral Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2007) On Philosophy, Politics, and Economics. Belmont, ca: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2011) The Order of Public Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2015) Public reason liberalism. In: Steven, Wall (ed.) The Cambridge Companion to Liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 112–40.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016a) The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016b) The Commonwealth of Bees: on the impossibility of justice-through-ethos. Social Philosophy & Policy 96121.Google Scholar
Gaus, G (2016c) Social morality and the primacy of individual perspectives. Review of Austrian Economics. DOI 10.1007/s11138–016-0358-8.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D (1986) Morals by Agreement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D (1998) Public reason. In: D’Agostino, F and Gaus, GF (eds) Public Reason. Brookeville: Ashgate, pp. 4366.Google Scholar
Gauthier, D (2013) Twenty-five on. Ethics 123: 601624.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, J (1995) Reconciliation through the public use of reason: remarks on John Rawls’s political liberalism. The Journal of Philosophy 92: 109131.Google Scholar
Hayek, FA (1973) Rules and Order. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T (1994 [1651]). Leviathan. Curley, E (ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kalai, E (1977) Proportional solutions to bargaining situations. Econometrica 45: 16231630.Google Scholar
Kalai, E and Smorodinsky, M (1975) Other solutions to Nash’s bargaining problem. Econometrica 43: 513518.Google Scholar
Kant, I (1999 [1797]) The Metaphysical Elements of Justice. Ladd, John (transl., 2nd ed.). Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T (1977) The Essential Tension. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Moehler, M (2017) Minimal Morality. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Muldoon, R (2016) Social Contract Theory for a Diverse World. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Nash, J (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18: 155162.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (1999a) A Theory of Justice, rev ed. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rawls, J (1999b) An outline of a decision procedure for ethics. In: Samuel, Freeman (ed.) John Rawls: Collected Papers. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1999, pp. 119.Google Scholar
Rawls, J (2005) Political Liberalism. expanded ed. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rubinstein, A (1982) Perfect equilibrium in a bargaining model. Econometrica 50: 97109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schotter, A and Sopher, B (2003) Social learning and coordination conventions in intergenerational games. Journal of Political Economy 111: 498529.Google Scholar
Thrasher, J (2014) Uniqueness and symmetry in bargaining theories of justice. Philosophical Studies 167: 683699.Google Scholar
Vanderschraaf, P (2018) Strategic Justice. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Williams, B (1981) Conflict of values. In: Williams, B (ed.) Moral Luck. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 7182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Bicchieri, C. (2016). Norms in the Wild: How to Diagnose, Measure, and Change Social Norms. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. and Richerson, P. J. (2005). Group-Beneficial Norms Can Spread Rapidly in a Structured Population. In: The Origin and Evolution of Cultures. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 227–40.Google Scholar
Colander, D. and Kupers, R. (2014). Complexity and the Art of Public Policy: Solving Society’s Problems from the Bottom Up. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F. (2010). Naturalizing Epistemology: Thomas Kuhn and the ‘Essential Tension.London: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
D’Agostino, F. (2013). The Orders of Public Reason. Analytic Philosophy, vol. 54 (March): 129155.Google Scholar
Downs, A. (1956). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Friedman, M. and Friedman, R. (1980). Free to Choose. London: Secker & Warburg.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (1996). Justificatory Liberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2011). The Order of Public Reason. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2016). The Tyranny of the Ideal: Justice in a Diverse Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017a). The Open Society and Its Friends: With Friends Like These, Who Needs Enemies? The Critique, January 15, 2017, www.thecritique.com/articles/open-society-and-its-friends. Accessed May 23, 2017.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017b). Social Morality and the Primacy of Individual Perspectives. Review of Austrian Economics, vol. 30: 377396.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. (2017c). Self-Organizing Moral Systems: Beyond Social Contract Theory. Politics, Philosophy and Economics, vol. 17: 119147, https://doi.org.10.1177/1470594X17719425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gaus, G. (2018). The Priority of Social Morality. In Morality, Governance, and Social Institutions: Reflections on Russell Hardin, edited by Christiano, Thomas, Creppell, Ingrid and Knight, Jack. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018.Google Scholar
Gaus, G. and Van Schoelandt, C. (2017). Consensus on What? Convergence for What? Four Models of Political Liberalism. Ethics, vol. 128: 145172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayek, F. A. (1964 [2014]). The Theory of Complex Phenomena. In: The Market and Other Orders, edited by Caldwell, Bruce. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, pp. 257266.Google Scholar
Hesse, M. B. (1966). Models and Analogies in Science. Notre Dame: Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Hotelling, H. (1929). Stability in Competition. Economic Journal, vol. 39: 4157.Google Scholar
Johnson, James (2014). Models Among the Political Theorists. American Journal of Political Science, vol. 58 (July): 547560.Google Scholar
Knight, F. (1921 [1964]). Risk, Uncertainty, and Profit. New York: Augustus M. Kelly.Google Scholar
Kogelmann, B. (2017). Agreement, All the Way Up: An Essay on Public Reason and Theory Choice. Doctoral dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, second edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lane, R. (2017). The Complexity of Self Government: Politics from the Bottom Up. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Levy, D. M. and Peart, S. J. (2017). Escape from Democracy: The Role of Experts and the Public in Economic Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, M. (2009). Complexity: A Guided Tour. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nozick, R. (1974). Anarchy, State and Utopia. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1986 [2014]). An Agenda for the Study of Institutions. In: Choice, Rules and Collective Action. Ed. Sabetti, Fillippo and Aligica, Paul Dragos. Essex: ECPR Press, pp. 97119.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. (1972 [1999]). Polycentricity (Part 2). In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ed. McGinnis, Michael D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 119–38.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V. and Ostrom, E. (1977 [1999]). Public Goods and Public Choices. In: Polycentricity and Local Public Economies. Ed. McGinnis, Michael D.. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, pp. 75103.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2011). Diversity and Complexity. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Page, S. E. (2016). Not Half Bad: A Modest Criterion for Inclusion. In: Complexity and Evolution: Toward a New Synthesis for Economics. E. Wilson, David S. and Kirman, Alan. Cambridge, ma: MIT Press, pp. 319–26.Google Scholar
Poundstone, W. (1992). Prisoner’s Dilemma: John von Neumann, Game Theory, and the Puzzle of the Bomb. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2005). Political Liberalism. Expanded edn. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rawls, J. (2007) Lectures on the History of Political Philosophy. Ed. Freeman, Samuel. Cambridge, ma: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Schumpeter, J. A. (1950). Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy. Third edn. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sen, A. (2017). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. Expanded edn. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vallier, K. (forthcoming). Must Politics Be War? Restoring Our Trust in the Open Society. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Weisberg, M. (2013). Simulation and Similarity: Using Models to Understand the World. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×