Skip to main content Accessibility help
Hostname: page-component-8bbf57454-9wdfl Total loading time: 0.284 Render date: 2022-01-21T21:25:00.981Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

3 - Budgets and financial management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 July 2014

Donald P. Moynihan
University of Wisconsin-Madison
Matthew Andrews
Harvard University’s Kennedy School of Government
Richard M. Walker
The University of Hong Kong
George A. Boyne
Cardiff University
Gene A. Brewer
University of Georgia
Get access



Money is the lifeblood of public service provision. It is where ‘everything of importance comes together’, because ‘[n]early everything we want government to do requires money’ (Kettl 1992: 1). Financial decisions invite conflict, because as White notes, ‘perhaps deciding the budget is not the most significant choice in any political system, but it is clearly the most important and controversial decision that is made again and again’ (White 1994: 113).

Given the central importance of money, the search for better government performance inevitably interacts with public financial management (PFM) systems. PFM systems represent a series of institutional routines that offer a powerful means to direct bureaucratic behaviour (Campos and Pradhan 1996). Most contemporary reforms that promise improved performance implicitly recognize this, advocating in various ways the reform of resource allocation and financial incentives. Ultimately, reform efforts that fail to align with financial processes represent the folly of rewarding A while expecting B (Kerr 1993).

Despite the centrality of PFM to reform and even the emphasis on resource allocation issues in most reforms, PFM has not always featured prominently in the nascent empirical public administration literature on public service performance. For this reason, this chapter takes a wide-ranging perspective on the relationship between PFM and performance. In addition, the chapter examines efforts to improve the performance of PFM systems. Such reforms are based on doctrinal claims, and scholarship remains split on the most basic questions: What is PFM performance? Why should PFM affect performance outcomes?

Public Management and Performance
Research Directions
, pp. 60 - 88
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)


Ammons, David, and Stenberg, Carl. 2007. ‘Commentary on reinventing administrative prescriptions: the case for democratic-constitutional impact statements and scorecard’, Public Administration Review, 67, 1, 1–8.Google Scholar
Andersen, Simon Calmar, and Mortensen, Peter B.. 2010. ‘Policy stability and organizational performance: is there a relationship?’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 20, 1, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Matthew. 2001. ‘Adjusting external audits to facilitate results oriented management’, The International Journal of Government Auditors, April, 10–14.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matthew. 2006. ‘Beyond best practice and basics first in performance-based reforms’, Public Administration & Development, 26, 2, 147–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Matthew. 2007. ‘What would an ideal PFM system look like?’, in Shah, A. (ed.) Budgeting and Budgetary Institutions. Washington, DC: World Bank, pp. 359–83.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matthew. 2010. ‘Good government means different things in different countries’, Governance, 23, 1 (January 2010), 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andrews, Matthew, and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2002. ‘Why reforms don’t always have to work to succeed: a tale of two managed competition initiatives’, Public Performance and Management Review, 25, 3, 282–97.Google Scholar
Andrews, Matthew, and Hill, Herb. 2003. ‘The impact of traditional budgeting systems on the effectiveness of performance-based budgeting: a different viewpoint on recent findings’, International Journal of Public Administration, 26, 2, 135–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Askim, Jostein, Johnsen, Åge, and Christophersen, Knut-Andreas. 2008. ‘Factors behind organizational learning from benchmarking: experiences from Norwegian municipal benchmarking networks’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 2, 297–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bartle, John R. 2001. ‘Budgeting, policy, and administration: patterns and dynamics in the United States’, International Journal of Public Administration, 24, 1, 21–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barzelay, Michael. 1997. ‘Central audit institutions and performance auditing: a comparative analysis of organizational strategies in the OECD’, Governance, 10, 3, 235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Behn, Robert D. and Kant, Peter A.. 1999. ‘Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting’, Public Productivity and Management Review, 22, 4, 470–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bevan, Gwyn, and Hood, Christopher. 2006. ‘What’s measured is what matters: targets and framing in the English public health care system’, Public Administration, 84, 3, 517–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdeaux, Carolyn. 2006. ‘Do legislatures matter in budgetary reform?’, Public Budgeting & Finance, 26, 1, 126–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bourdeaux, Carolyn, and Chikoto, Grace. 2008. ‘Legislative influences on performance management reform’, Public Administration Review, 68, 2, 253–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowling, Cynthia, Cho, Chung-Lae, and Wright, Deil S.. 2004. ‘Establishing a continuum from minimizing to maximizing bureaucrats: state agency head preferences for governmental expansion – a typology of administrator growth postures, 1964–98’, Public Administration Review, 64, 4, 489–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyne, George A., and Chen, Alex A.. 2007. ‘Performance targets and public service improvement’, Journal of Public Administration and Research Theory, 17, 3, 455–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bretschneider, S., and Gorr, W. 1989. ‘Forecasting as a science’, International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 305–6.Google Scholar
Bretschneider, S., Gorr, W., Grizzle, G., and Klay, E.. 1989. ‘Political and organizational influences on forecast accuracy: forecasting state sales tax receipts’, International Journal of Forecasting, 5, 307–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brewer, Gene A. 2005. ‘In the eye of the storm: frontline supervisors and federal agency performance.’Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 15, 4, 505–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brinkerhoff, Derrick, and Goldsmith, Arthur. 2005. ‘Institutional dualism and international development: a revisionist interpretation of good governance’, Administration & Society, 37, 199–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Tyrone M., and Guthrie, James. 2003. ‘Accrual output based budgeting systems in Australia: the rhetoric-reality gap’, Public Management Review, 5, 2, 145–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campos, Ed, and Pradhan, Sanjay. 1996. ‘Budgetary institutions and expenditure outcomes: binding governments to fiscal performance’, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 1646. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Chwastiak, Michelle. 2001. ‘Taming the untamable: planning, programming, and budgeting and the normalization of war’, Accounting, Organizations, and Society, 6, 26, 501–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curristine, Theresa. 2005. ‘Performance information in the budget process: results of the OECD 2005 questionnaire’, OECD Journal of Budgeting, 5, 2, 87–131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Denison, Dwight V., Yan, Wenli, and Zhao, Zhirong (Jerry). 2007. ‘Is management performance a factor in municipal bond credit ratings? The case of Texas school districts’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 27, 4, 86–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diamond, Jack. 2002. ‘The role of internal audit in government financial management: an international perspective’, International Monetary Fund, Working Paper No. 2/94.
Dias, J. J., and Maynard-Moody, S.. 2007. ‘For-profit welfare: contracts, conflicts, and the performance paradox’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 17, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dolan, Julie. 2002. ‘The budget-minimizing bureaucrat? Empirical evidence from the senior executive service’, Public Administration Review, 62, 1, 42–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dull, Matt. 2009. ‘Results-model reform leadership: questions of credible commitment’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 19, 255–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunleavy, Patrick. 1991. Democracy, Bureaucracy and Public Choice: Economic Explanations in Political Science. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.Google Scholar
Forrester, John P. 2001. ‘Public choice theory and public budgeting: implications for the greedy bureaucrat’, in Bartle, John R. (ed.) Evolving Theories of Public Budgeting. New York: JAI Press, pp. 101–24.Google Scholar
Gilmour, John B., and Lewis, David E.. 2006. ‘Does performance budgeting work? An examination of OMB’s PART scores’, Public Administration Review, 66, 5, 742–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grizzle, Gloria. 1986. ‘Does budget format really govern the actions of budgetmakers?’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 6, 1, 60–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guthrie, J. 1998. ‘Application of accrual accounting in the Australian information preferences’, Accounting, Accountability and Performance, 14, 1, 1–19.Google Scholar
von Hagen, Jurgen, and Harden, Ian J.. 1995. ‘Budget processes and commitment to fiscal discipline’, European Economic Review, 39, 3–4, 771–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinrich, Carolyn J., and Choi, Youseok. 2007. ‘Performance-based contracting in social welfare programs’, The American Review of Public Administration, 37, 4, 409–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Yilin. 2003. ‘What stabilizes state general fund spending during downturns: budget stabilization fund, general fund unreserved undesignated balance, or both?’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 23, 3, 64–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Yilin, and Moynihan, Donald P.. 2008. ‘The case for counter cyclical fiscal capacity’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18, 1, 139–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Yilin, Moynihan, Donald P., and Ingraham, Patricia W.. 2003. ‘Capacity, management and performance: exploring the links’, American Review of Public Administration, 33, 3, 295–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hou, Yilin and Smith, Daniel L.. 2009. ‘Informal norms as a bridge between formal rules and outcomes of government financial operations: evidence from State Balanced Budget Requirements’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mup026CrossRef
Ingraham, Patricia W., Moynihan, Donald P., and Andrews, Matthew. 2008. ‘Formal and informal institutions in public administration’, in Guy Peters, B. and Savoie, Donald (eds.) Institutional Theory in Political Science. Manchester University Press.Google Scholar
Joyce, Philip J. 2003. ‘Linking Performance and Budgeting: Opportunities in the Federal Budgeting Process’, Washington DC: IBM Center of the Business of Government.
Kelman, Steven. 2005. Unleashing Change: a Study of Organizational Renewal in Government. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Kelman, Steven, and Friedman, John N.. 2009. ‘Performance improvement and performance dysfunction: an empirical examination of distortionary impacts of the emergency room wait-time target in the English national health service’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory Advance Access, 28, 1.Google Scholar
Kerr, S. 1993. ‘An academy classic: on the folly of rewarding A, while hoping for B’, Academy of Management Executive, 9, 1, 7–14.Google Scholar
Kettl, Donald. 1992. Deficit Politics. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Klase, Kenneth A., and Dougherty, Michael John. 2002. ‘The effect of performance budgeting on state functional expenditures’, a paper prepared for the 2002 meeting of the Association of Budgeting and Financial Management, Washington, DC.
Klay, W. E. 1987. ‘Management through budgetary incentives’, Public Productivity and Management Review, 41 (Spring), 59–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kloot, Louise, and Martin, John. 2000. ‘Strategic performance management: a balanced approach to performance management issues in local government’, Management Accounting Research, 11, 2, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knack, Steven. 2002. ‘Social capital and the quality of government: evidence from the US states’, American Journal of Political Science, 46, 4, 772–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraan, Dirk-Jan. 1996. Budgetary Decisions: a Public Choice Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krause, George A., Lewis, David E., and Douglas, James W.. 2006. ‘Political appointments, civil service systems, and bureaucratic competence: organizational balancing and gubernatorial revenue forecasts in the American states’, American Journal of Political Science, 50, 3, 770–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Lancer Julnes, Patria, and Holzer, Marc. 2001. ‘Promoting the utilization of performance measures in public organizations: an empirical study of factors affecting adoption and implementation’, Public Administration Review, 61, 6, 693–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laswell, H. 1990. Politics: Who Gets What When and How?New York: Peter Smith.Google Scholar
Lynch, Thomas, and Lynch, Cynthia. 1997. ‘The road to entrepreneurial budgeting’, Journal of Public Budgeting Accounting and Financial Management, 9, 1, 161–80.Google Scholar
Marlowe, Justin, and David S. T. Matkin. 2009. ‘Does internal control matter to investors?’ Unpublished paper.
Melkers, Julia, and Willoughby, Katherine. 2005. ‘Models of performance-measurement use in local governments: understanding budgeting, communication, and lasting effects’, Public Administration Review, 65, 2, 180–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mikesell, John L. 1995. Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector, 4th edn. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Montes, Carlos, and Andrews, Matthew. 2005. ‘Implementing reforms in Bolivia: too much to handle’, International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 3–4, 273–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, Donald P. 2006. ‘Ambiguity in policy lessons: the agencification experience’, Public Administration, 84, 4, 1029–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moynihan, Donald P. 2008. The Dynamics of Performance Management: Constructing Information and Reform. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Moynihan, Donald P., and Ingraham, Patricia W.. 2004. ‘Integrative leadership in the public sector: a model of performance information use’, Administration & Society, 36, 4, 427–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, Richard. 2005. ‘Presidential address: ‘“Complexifying” government oversight in America’s government’, Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 4, 2, 207–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niskanen, William A. 1971. Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.Google Scholar
Oduro, Kojo N. 2002. ‘Results-based oriented public expenditure system in Ghana’, Overseas Development Institute Working Paper No: 208. London: Overseas Development Institute.
OECD. 2007. Budget Practices and Procedures Database. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
Office of Management and Budget (OMB). 2007. Competitive Sourcing. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Plummer, M. L., Wight, D., Obasi, A. I. N., Wamoyi, J., Mshana, G., Todd, J., et al. 2007. ‘A process evaluation of a school-based adolescent sexual health intervention in rural Tanzania: the MEMA kwa Vijana programme’, Health Education Research, 22, 4, 500–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poister, Theodore H., and Streib, Gregory D.. 1999. ‘Strategic management in the public sector’, Public Productivity and Management, 22, 3, 308–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2000. ‘Is the emperor in his underwear? An analysis of the impacts of public management reform’, Public Management Review, 2, 2, 181–99.Google Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2003. ‘Performance audit in Europe: trends and choices’, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14, 1–2, 157–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pollitt, Christopher. 2005. ‘Performance management in practice: a comparative study of executive agencies’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 16, 1, 25–44.9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poterba, James M., and Hagen, Jurgen Von. 1998. Fiscal Institutions and Fiscal Performance. University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Radin, Beryl. 2006. Challenging the Performance Movement: Accountability, Complexity and Democratic Values. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.Google Scholar
Roberts, J. 2003. ‘Managing public expenditure for development results and poverty reduction’, Overseas Development Institute. Working Paper No: 203. London: ODI.
Rosenbloom, David. 2007. ‘Reinventing administrative prescriptions: the case for democratic-­constitutional impact statements and scorecards’, Public Administration Review, 67, 1, 28–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. 1998a. A Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Schick, Allen. 1998b. ‘Why most countries should not try New Zealand reforms.’World Bank Research Observer, 13, 1, 123–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. 2002a. ‘Does budgeting have a future?’, OECD Journal of Budgeting, 2, 2, 7–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. 2002b. ‘Opportunity, strategy, and tactics in reforming public management’, OECD Journal of Budgeting, 2, 3, 7–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schick, Allen. 2003. ‘The performing state: reflections on an idea whose time has come, but whose implementation has not’, OECD Journal of Budgeting, 3, 2, 71–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siegelman, Lee. 1996. ‘The bureaucrat as budget maximizer: an assumption examined’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 6, 1, 50–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, Fred. 1994. ‘Mission-driven, results-oriented budgeting: fiscal administration and the new public management’, Public Budgeting and Finance, 14, 3, 90–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van Landingham, Gary, Wellman, Martha, and Andrews, Matthew. 2005. ‘Useful, but not a panacea: performance-based program budgeting in Florida’, International Journal of Public Administration, 28, 3, 233–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wescott, Clay G. 2008. World bank support for public financial management: conceptual roots and evidence of impact. SSRN working paper, available at: .
Wheeler, Graeme P. 2003. Sound Practices in Public Debt Management. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
White, Joseph. 1994. ‘(Almost) nothing new under the sun: why the work of budgeting remains incremental’, Public Budgeting and Finance, Spring, 113–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildavsky, Aaron A., and Caiden, Naomi. 2003. The New Politics of the Budgetary Process, 5th edn. New York: Longman.Google Scholar
The World Bank. 1998. Public Expenditure Management Handbook. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
The World Bank. 2003. Tanzania Public Expenditure Review. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the or variations. ‘’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats