Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Home
Hostname: page-component-6c8bd87754-dzvvk Total loading time: 0.564 Render date: 2022-01-17T17:01:00.581Z Has data issue: true Feature Flags: { "shouldUseShareProductTool": true, "shouldUseHypothesis": true, "isUnsiloEnabled": true, "metricsAbstractViews": false, "figures": true, "newCiteModal": false, "newCitedByModal": true, "newEcommerce": true, "newUsageEvents": true }

Book contents

2 - Conceptual Framework

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 April 2017

Monika Heupel
Affiliation:
Otto-Friedrich-Universität Bamberg, Germany
Michael Zürn
Affiliation:
Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung
Get access

Summary

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Protecting the Individual from International Authority
Human Rights in International Organizations
, pp. 40 - 65
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2017

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abbott, Kenneth W., Keohane, Robert O., Moravcsik, Andrew, Slaughter, Anne-Marie and Snidal, Duncan 2000. ‘The concept of legalization’. International Organization 54(3): 401419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan 1998. ‘Why states act through formal international organizations’. Journal of Conflict Resolution 42(1): 332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abbott, Kenneth W. and Snidal, Duncan 2000. ‘Hard and soft law in international governance’. International Organization 54: 421456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aldrich, Howard and Herker, Diane 1977. ‘Boundary spanning roles and organization structure’. Academy of Management Review 2(2): 217230.Google Scholar
Alter, Karen 2013. The New Terrain of International Law: Courts, Politics, Rights. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Alvarez, José E. (1996) ‘The United States financial veto’, in Hargrove, (ed.), Are International Institutions Doing Their Job? American Society of International Law (ASIL), Proceedings of the 90th Annual Meeting. Washington, DC: ASIL, pp. 319324.Google Scholar
Barnett, Michael and Finnemore, Martha 2004. Rules for the World. International Organizations in Global Politics. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Bennett, Andrew and Checkel, Jeffrey 2014. ‘Process tracing. From philosophical roots to best practices’, in Bennett, and Checkel, (eds), Process Tracing: From Metaphor to Analytic Tool. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berthoin Antal, Ariane, Lenhardt, Uwe and Rosenbrock, Rolf 2001. ‘Barriers to organizational learning’, in Dierkes, , Berthoin Antal, , Child, and Nonaka, (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 865885.Google Scholar
Böhling, Kathrin (2007) Opening Up the Black Box. Organizational Learning in the European Commission. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Börzel, Tanja A. and Risse, Thomas 2012. ‘From Europeanisation to diffusion: Introduction’. West European Politics 35: 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunsson, Nils 1989. The Organization of Hypocrisy: Talk, Decision and Action in Organizations. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Chayes, Abram and Chayes, Antonia 1995. The New Sovereignty: Compliance with International Regulatory Agreements. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Checkel, Jeffrey 2005. ‘It’s the process stupid! Process tracing in the study of European and international politics’. ARENA Working Paper No. 26, Oslo University.
Chesterman, Simon (2008) ‘Globalization rules: Accountability, power, and the prospects for global administrative law’. Global Governance 14(3): 942.Google Scholar
Child, John and Heavens, Sally J. 2003. ‘The social constitution of organizations and its implications for organizational learning’, in Dierkes, , Berthoin Antal, , Child, and Nonaka, (eds), Handbook of Organizational Learning and Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 308326.Google Scholar
Dai, Xinyuan 2007. International Institutions and National Policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deitelhoff, Nicole 2009. ‘The discursive process of legalization: Charting islands of persuasion in the ICC case’. International Organization 63(1): 3365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wet, Erika (2010) ‘Holding international institutions accountable: The complementary role of non-judicial oversight mechanisms and judicial review’, in von Bogdandy, , Wolfrum, , von Bernstorff, , Dann, and Goldmann, (eds), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions. Advancing International Institutional Law. Berlin: Springer, pp. 855882.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Wet, Erika and Nollkaemper, André 2002. ‘Review of Security Council decisions by national courts’, in Delbrück, , Hoffmann, and Zimmermann, (eds), German Yearbook of International Law, Vol. 45. Berlin: Duncker & Humblot, pp. 166202.Google Scholar
Dolowitz, David P. and March, David 2000. ‘Learning from abroad: The role of policy transfer in contemporary policy making’. Governance: An International Journal of Policy and Administration 13(1), 524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia G. and Lynch, Julia F. 2009. ‘Context and causal mechanisms in political analysis’. Comparative Political Studies 42(9): 11431166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finnemore, Martha and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. ‘International norm dynamics and political change’. International Organization 52(4): 887917.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Franck, Thomas M. 1990. The Power of Legitimacy among Nations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Gehring, Thomas and Oberthür, Sebastian 2009. ‘The causal mechanisms of interaction between international institutions’. European Journal of International Relations 15(1): 125156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1979. ‘Case studies and theory development: The method of structured, focused comparison’, in Lauren, (ed.), Diplomacy. New Approaches in History, Theory, and Policy. New York, London: Free Press, pp. 4368.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. and Bennett, Andrew 2005. Case Study and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth W. and Keohane, Robert O. 2005. ‘Accountability and abuses of power in world politics’. American Political Science Review 99(1): 2943.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru 2007. ‘Transparency of intergovernmental organizations: The role of member states, international bureaucracies and nongovernmental organizations’. International Studies Quarterly 51(3): 625648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grigorescu, Alexandru 2008. ‘Horizontal accountability in intergovernmental organizations’. Ethics & International Affairs 22(3): 285308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haas, Ernst 1990. When Knowledge is Power. Three Models of Change in International Organizations. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Hall, Peter A. 2008. ‘Systematic process analysis: When and how to use it’. European Political Science 7(3): 304317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hawkins, Darren G., Lake, David A., Nielson, Daniel L. and Tierney, Michael J. (eds) 2006. Delegation and Agency in International Organizations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heupel, Monika 2013. ‘With power comes responsibility: Human rights protection in UN sanctions policy’. European Journal of International Relations 19(4): 771795.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirschl, Ran 2004. Towards Juristocracy: The Origins and Consequences of the New Constitutionalism. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Hirschmann, Gisela 2012. ‘Organizational learning in United Nations’ peacekeeping exit strategies’. Cooperation and Conflict 47(3): 368385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ILA (International Law Association) 2004. ‘Berlin Conference. Accountability of International Organisations’. Final Report. www.ila-hq.org/download.cfm/docid/6B708C25-4D6D-42E2-8385DADA752815E8 (2 January 2017).
Joachim, Jutta, Reinalda, Bob and Verbeek, Bertjan (eds) 2008. International Organizations and Implementation: Enforcers, Managers, Authorities? Milton Park: Routledge.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1998. Activists Beyond Borders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Keck, Margaret E. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1999. ‘Transnational advocacy networks in international and regional politics’. International Social Science Journal 51(159): 89101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsbury, Benedict, Krisch, Nico and Stewart, Richard B. 2005. ‘The emergence of global administrative law’. Law and Contemporary Problems 68(3): 1561.Google Scholar
Krisch, Nico 2005. ‘International law in times of hegemony: Unequal power and the shaping of the international legal order’. European Journal of International Law 16(3): 369408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levy, Jack 1989. ‘The diversionary theory of war: A critique’, in Midlarsky, (ed.), Handbook of War Studies. London: Unwin-Hyman, pp. 259288.Google Scholar
Mayntz, Renate 2004. ‘Mechanisms in the analysis of social macro-phenomena’. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 34(2): 237259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nasu, Hitoshi 2009. ‘Who guards the guardian? Towards regulation of the UN Security Council’s Chapter VII powers through dialogue’, in Farrall, and Rubenstein, (eds.), Sanctions, Accountability and Governance in a Globalised World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 123142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neyer, Jürgen and Wolf, Dieter 2005. ‘The analysis of compliance with international rules: definitions, variables and methodology’, in Zürn, and Joerges, (eds.), Law and Governance in Postnational Europe: Compliance beyond the Nation-State. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 4064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielson, Daniel L., Tierney, Michael J. and Weaver, Catherine E. 2006. Bridging the rationalist-constructivist divide: Reengineering the culture of the World Bank’. Journal of International Relations and Development 9: 107139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, Aoife, Porter, Bruce and Langford, Malcolm 2007. ‘The Justiciability of Social and Economic Rights: An Updated Appraisal’. CHRGJ Working Paper 15. www.right-to-education.org/sites/right-to-education.org/files/resource-attachments/Nolan_Porter_Langford_The_Justiciability_of_Social_and_Economic_Rights_2007_en.pdf (13 October 2015).
Park, Susan and Vetterlein, Antje 2010. Owning Development: Creating Policy Norms in the IMF and the World Bank. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peters, Anne. 2009. ‘Membership in the global constitutional community’, in Klabbers, , Peters, and Ulfstein, (eds.), The Constitutionalization of International Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 153262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Raustiala, Kal and Victor, David G. 2004. ‘The regime complex for plant genetic resources’. International Organization 58(2): 277309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinisch, August (ed.) 2010. Challenging Acts of International Institutions before National Courts. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Risse, Thomas 2000. ‘“Let’s argue!”: Communicative action in world politics’. International Organization 54(1): 139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Risse, Thomas, Ropp, Stephen C. and Sikkink, Kathryn 1999. The Power of Human Rights. International Norms and Domestic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank 2003. The EU, NATO and the Integration of Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank 2006. ‘Constitutional courts, rhetorical action and the institutionalization of human rights in the European Union’. Journal of European Public Policy 13(8): 12471264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schimmelfennig, Frank 2012. ‘A comparison of rule of law promotion policies of major western powers’, in Zürn, , Nollkaemper, and Peerenboom, (eds.), Rule of Law Dynamics in an Era of International and Transnational Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 111132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, James M. 1997. ‘In the loop. Congressional influence in American foreign policy’. Journal of Political and Military Sociology 25: 4775.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2009. Mobilizing for Human Rights. International Law in Domestic Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simmons, Beth A., Dobbin, Frank and Garrett, Geoffrey 2008. The Global Diffusion of Markets and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tallberg, Jonas, Sommerer, Thomas, Squatrito, Theresa and Jönsson, Christer 2013. The Opening Up of International Organizations: Transnational Access in Global Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
UN General Assembly 2005. ‘Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for the Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law’, 21 March 2006, A/RES/60/147. Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights. www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/RemedyAndReparation.aspx (13 October 2015).
Von Bogdandy, Armin. 2010. ‘General principles of international public authority: Sketching a research field’, in von Bogdandy, , Wolfrum, , von Bernstorff, , Dann, and Goldmann, (eds.), The Exercise of Public Authority by International Institutions: Advancing International Institutional Law. Heidelberg: Springer, pp. 728760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Catherine und Leiteritz, Ralf 2005. ‘“Our poverty is a world full of dreams”: Reforming the World Bank’. Global Governance 11: 369388.Google Scholar
Wessel, Jared (2006) ‘Judicial policymaking at the international criminal court: An institutional guide to analyzing international adjudication’. Columbia Journal of Transnational Law 44(2): 377452.Google Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard 2008. ‘Judicialization matters! A comparison of dispute settlement under GATT and the WTO’. International Studies Quarterly 52(4): 825854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangl, Bernhard, Helmedach, Achim, Mondré, Aletta, Kocks, Alexander, Neubauer, Gerald and Blome, Kerstin 2011. ‘Between law and politics: Explaining international dispute settlement behavior’. European Journal of International Relations 17(1): 133.Google Scholar
1
Cited by

Send book to Kindle

To send this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle.

Note you can select to send to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be sent to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Send book to Dropbox

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Send book to Google Drive

To send content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about sending content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×